HOA - NEVADA EMBEZZLEMENTS

I had some questions about this report for Jonathan Friedrich, Nevada, NRED board member and I will put them below, in blue, with his answers in red.  I know NV publishes the HOA fraud closures separately, but how do they know if homes were stolen during the commission in the cover up of other HOA criminality?

At any rate, this is just a small segment from Nevada. Can you imagine if in states where these monetary crimes of theft and property theft had been investigated and reported, for what they really are and have been, what the total financial loss to innocent homeowners has been?  Certain states and locales should be ashamed of what they have allowed and refused to investigate and stop. One state, in my opinion is Pennsylvania and at the very least one locale, Monroe County, Pennsylvania! 

PA legislators, law enforcement, investigative agencies, Federal agencies of investigation and enforcement in PA, and anyone else accountable, need to investigate, charge, prosecute and rectify the victims of these crimes and property thefts.  The press needs to report on every case/account, no matter who the predators and perpetrators are, or who they know.  Funny, the press will report on a $1000.00 theft, or identity theft, etc., but when it comes to the thousands, upon thousands of dollars, and even a hundred thousand, and many probably hundreds of thousands, nothing will be  investigated, nor the refusal of law enforcement and others, to investigate, be reported on.  Are HOA/COA/POA financial crimes and property thefts the

"perfect crimes," or is it that those empowered, paid and accountable could care less? 

My questions:

Jonathan, please help me here. Over what time frame is this, for it appears, the time frame of the commission of the crimes is included, but are these records put out quarterly, or other?  Are these all reported, or the ones they have just investigated and prosecuted over a specific time frame?

What about attorney involvement, and or prosecutions?  Are they under the same division, or attorney disciplinary board?  How about homes stolen by these thugs and criminals in the process of the crimes show here for monetary amounts?  Any data on how many they have fraudulently made homeless, extorted from, fraudulently fined, assessed, registered liens and fraud closed?

This is absolutely outrageous and horrible and I trust it is the same, and even worse, in other states and locales in America!  How much needs to be stolen and how many have to endure this criminality and fraudulent homelessness, before the press, or legislators and law enforcement in every state "gets it." 

How many lies of "isolated incidents," and other propaganda about "dead beats who don't pay bills," and/or "homeowners who didn't/don't read their documents," etc., do we need to endure before those responsible who are judicially empowered, and/or elected and paid to stop these abuses and horrible crimes, against the most innocent, do so?

Thanks you, Jonathan.

Sincerely,

Jonathan Friedrich's response to my questions about the report and the recent Nevada NRED on HOA, etc., financial crimes report below his response.

"In response to your questions

There are a LOT more cases that the Commission deals  with that DO NOT involve theft.

There is no set time frame. As the Real Estate Division investigates and the puts the complaints together it is then set to be heard at the next Commission meeting. Normally the Commission meets 4 times a year.

All these cases are Public Record but you have to go look for them. Some of these cases but NOT all are on the Commission Web site not easy to find.

The Commission  can only take a CAM licence away and fine them or a fine a Board member and REMOVE them from the Board.

The Division says they refer cases of theft to law enforcement. I do not know what if anything happens thereafter!

I do not have any answers for your other questions."

Jonathan

CHART INDICATING EMBEZZLEMENT OR MISAPPROPRIATION*  OF HOA FUNDS

(DATA FROM COMMISSION COMPLAINTS AND FINDINGS OF FACTS & ORDERS)

INDIVIDUAL(S) NAME	CASE  NUMBER	ASSOCIATION NAME	CAM / BOARD	AMOUNT	DATED
IRENE IWANYLO	CIS 09-06-09-259	ROCK SPRINGS HOA SUNDANCE HOA PARADISE VALLEY CAMDEN PARK                          TOTAL	CAM	$  3,258    15,449      5,052    29,000  $ 52,759	SEPT. 2, 2009
REGINA SERRANO	CIS 09-12-08-105 CIS 09-09-05-041 CIS 09-07-05-005	STERLING  HOA THE BLUFS VILLAGE II GLENWOOD VILLAGE MONTAIRE COMM. TATARA UNIT OWNERS LEGACY HIGHLANDS                           TOTAL	CAM	1,300    87,588    36,160    91,367    13,225    44,913  274,553*	OCT. 9, 2009
BARRY FLOYD	CIS  09-10-22-072 CIS 09-11-08-087	GREENBRIAR T. H. NORTHSHORE  HOA	CAM	160,346	OCT.9, 2009
JULIE SALAZAR	IS 10-2074	PARK RIDGE HOA	BOARD MBR.	28,045	AUG. 22, 2012
RAYMOND BARR	IS 10-2147	COLONY HOA	BOARD MBR.	62,687	AUG    9, 2011
Mr.& MRS. J . BITSKY	IS 10-2194	AUTUMN CHASE	BOARD MBRS	10,312	OCT.    9, 2012
JOHN SWANSON BRIDGET COUGHLIN TERESA BRUNNER BRENDA TIERNEY WAYNE KLOSEK	IS 13-2668	PUEBLO AT SANTA FE CONDOMINIUM INC.	BOARD MBRS	20,000	AUG. 30, 2013
PARADISE SPA	IS 11-2284 IS 11-2148	JIM PAZARGAD AA RON YASHOUAFAR DAVID POUBABA RAVEN MORGAN CARY BELKIN	BOARD MBRS	842,871	AUG. 23, 2011
INDIVIDUAL(S) NAME	CASE  NUMBER	ASSOCIATION NAME	CAM / BOARD	AMOUNT	DATED
STEPHEN BURGER	S 06-10-06-146	MEADOWVALE HOA	CAM	4,299	May    3,  2007
THOMAS MITSKY	IS 08-06-01-164	SUNRIDGE MANOR	CAM	10,002	OCT. 17, 2008
MARY BRAILEY	CIS 12-10-25-087	5 ASSOCIATIONS IN          MESQUITE	CAM	6,822	DEC.6, 2013
ALICE LUCAS	CIS 10-05-09-258	L.V. MOTOR COACH	CAM	10,045	JUNE 19, 2012
DEBI PIKE	CIS 12-08-29-038	SONORA HILLS	CAM	2,300	MARCH 5, 2012
RONALD DECK DAVID HOUGE ROY ROUNDY STEPHEN WILLNER ARDELLA BRAUTIGAM BRENDA HELLER	IN 12-1580 CIN 12-05-29-216	SIERRA GARDENS	BOARD MBRS	55,687	SEPT 4, 2013
PETERS PIVAROFF	S 05-18-37-136	REGENCY TOWERS	BOARD MBRS	5,686	FEB. 16, 2006
DIANE WILD	CIS 14-07-51-051	MISSION HILLS	CAM	51,081	FEB. 16, 2014
DIANE WILD	CIS 13-09-19-075	SMOKY LANE CONDOS	CAM	1,453	FEB. 16, 2014
DIANE WILD	CIS 11-05-34-311	MISSION HILLS HOA	CAM	3,520	MARCH 19,2013
SHARON WILSON	CIS 08-11-02-060	ROSEWOOD HOA	CAM	166,000	AUG 27, 2008
HARRY  RANDOLPH	IS  08-06-01-164	SUNRIDGE  MANOR	CAM	10,002	NOV.17, 2008
THOMAS HAYES	A-13-675571-C	CACTUS SPRINGS	BOARD MBRS	Abt.300,000	JAN. 24, 2013
JUDITH FENNER	CIS 13-09-12-068	TARA HOA	CAM	NOT SHOWN	DEC  .6, 2013
THOMAS R CURRIERE	IS 05-1231 IS 06-1342 CIS 09-03-01-153	TARY TOWNE	CAM	10,000	NOV. 8, 2009
JEAN KRYM	CIS 12-08-27-036	MARIE ANTOINETTE  HOA	CAM	3,373	AUG 22, 2012
PENNY WOOD aka PENNY FREDERICK	CIS 11-09-01-040 CIS 11-12-08-133 CIS 11-07-11-011 CIS 11-07-18-018 CIS 11-10-34-114	ALLURE 1 TOWNHOMES	CAM	10,000	JUNE  1, 2011
INDIVIDUAL(S) NAME	CASE  NUMBER	ASSOCIATION NAME	CAM / BOARD	AMOUNT	DATED
KELLY DRYDEN SYLVIA ROMERO RENE MONTENEGRO	IS 09-1933	RANCHO SAN JUAN	BOARD MBRS	NOT SHOWN	SEPT. 16, 2011
LISA  KIM  JUSTICE DEPT CASE	CIS 12-06-05-229	VISTANA HOA PARK AVE HOA	CAM	NOT SHOWN	DEC. 19, 2012
MARY ANN WATTS JUSTICE DEPT CASE	CIS 12-10-22-084	VISTANA CHATEAU VERSAILLES CHATEAU NOUVEAU	CAM	NOT SHOWN	JUNE 19, 2012
DENISE KESER JUSTICE DEPT CASE	CIS 12-12-02-094	VISTANA CHATEAU NOUVEAU	CAM	NOT SHOWN	JUNE 19, 2012
DEBORAH GENATO JUSTICE DEPT CASE	CIS 12-09-14-071	VISTANA CHATEAU VERSAILLES CHATEAU NOUVEAU	CAM	NOT SHOWN	JUNE 19, 2012
MARIA LIMON JUSTICE DEPT CASE	2014-2009	CHATEAU NOUVEAU	CAM	NOT SHOWN	JUNE 3, 2014

Prepared from The Nevada Real Estate Division Complaints for Disciplinary Action and the Finding of Facts issued by the Common-Interest Communities and Condominium Hotels Commission State of Nevada.

This may Not be all cases involving Embezzlement or Misappropriation*

Amounts shown may not be all-inclusive and may be higher than indicated. In some of the cases services, materials or

other items of value were taken in addition to money.

22 Cases involved CAMS (Community Association Managers)

9      Cases involved Board Member(s)

July 18, 2014

By Jonathan Friedrich

290 Million Years Old Human Footprints!

290 Million Years Old Human Footprints! *New*

More evidence to add to my April 28th article, entitled:
The Human Specie is Hundreds of Millions of Years Old!

The 290 to 248 million years old New Mexico Footprints

According to forbidenhistory.info,
In 1987, paleontologist Jerry MacDonald discovered a wide variety of fossilized tracks from several different species of animals and birds, located in a Permian strata. Among the various fossilized tracks were the clear prints of a human foot.

However, the Permian strata has been dated from 290 to 248 million years ago- millions of years before animals, birds, dinosaurs, and yes, man, was supposed to exist. How then can these prints be explained?

In July 1992, the Smithsonian Magazine had an article on these tracks called "Petrified Footprints: A Puzzling Parade of Permian Beasts".[1] The magazine acknowledged the mystery, acknowledging "what paleontologists like to call, 'problematica.'" It described what appeared to be large mammal and bird tracks that, "evolved long after the Permian period, yet these tracks are clearly Permian."



While it is commendable that MacDonald and the Smithsonian clearly acknowledge the existence of these tracks in a strata that contradicts the current evolutionary theory, it is noteworthy that they highlight only the mammal and bird prints, and don't mention the human footprint found with them.

Interestingly enough, since these tracks have been discovered, evolutionists have not tried to argue their authenticity or debunk them. Nor have they tried to argue that the footprint isn't human. (Often they claim that it's a print that just "looks like" a human footprint.) Their very silence is deafening.

[1] See "Petrified Footprints: A Puzzling Parade of Permian Beasts" by Jerry MacDonald, Smithsonian, July 1992, Vol. 23, Issue 4, p. 70-79

HumansAreFree.com is and will always be free to access. All my personal articles are and always will be Copyright-Free. If you appreciate my work and want to buy me a coffee, please click the button bellow

http://anunnakireptilians.blogspot.com/2012/08/290-million-years-old-human-footprints.html

Friday, July 18th, 2014 | Posted by Veterans Today

Reporter Exposing War Crimes Gets Pulled From NBC News

NBC Pulls Veteran Reporter After Witness To Gaza Kids Murder

NBC is facing questions over its decision to pull veteran news correspondent Ayman Mohyeldin out of Gaza just after he personally witnessed the Israeli military’s killing of four Palestinian boys on a Gaza beach. Mohyeldin was kicking a soccer ball around with the boys just minutes before they died.

He is a longtime reporter in the region. In his coverage, he reports on the Gaza conflict in the context of the Israeli occupation, sparking criticism from some supporters of the Israeli offensive.

Back in 2008 and 2009, when he worked for Al Jazeera, Mohyeldin and his colleague Sherine Tadros were the only foreign journalists on the ground in Gaza as Israel killed 1,400 people in what it called “Operation Cast Lead.

” We speak to Glenn Greenwald of The Intercept, who has revealed that the decision to pull Mohyeldin from Gaza and remove him from reporting on the situation came from NBC executive David Verdi. Greenwald also comments on the broader picture of the coverage of the Israel/Palestine conflict in the U.S. media.

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=311581

Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary) – NOTE: Disturbing material; use discretion. ~J

Conspiracy Of Silence (Banned Discovery Channel Documentary) – NOTE: Disturbing material; use discretion. ~J

Posted on July 19, 2014 by Jean

Please note: It took me quite a while to find another youtube video to play here, since the original video contained in this article had been withdrawn. . . Boys Town was a wonderful, idealized story/movie, released in 1938 (!)  I remember hearing about as a child that starred Spencer Tracy and Mickey Rooney. I was astonished to find out the likley truth about Boys Town, and I urge you at least to view enough of this video to understand the ‘real’ truth of what was probably going on there.

As you can see, I published this story more than two years ago, but it seems back then people were not yet ready to ‘hear’ the truth about what went on there. I’m publishing the story again, because of the two editorials I recently published by Brett Redmayne-Titley. I hope the world is now ready to listen and understand . . . ~J

Posted on January 14, 2012
by Jean

While this is a disturbing video, to avoid at least watching a portion of it through denial is to avoid the truth. Is denial the answer to our situation? The truth will set us free. ~J 

“Conspiracy of Silence” is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a nationwide child abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, “Conspiracy of Silence” reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic child abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.

Based on DeCamp’s riveting book, The Franklin Cover-up, “Conspiracy of Silence” begins with the shut-down of Nebraska’s Franklin Community Federal Credit Union after a raid by federal agencies in November 1988 revealed that $40 million was missing. When the Nebraska legislature launched a probe into the affair, what initially looked like a financial swindle soon exploded into a startling tale of drugs, money laundering, and a nationwide child abuse ring. Nineteen months later, the legislative committee’s chief investigator died suddenly and violently, like more than a dozen other people linked to the Franklin case.

So why have you never heard of the Franklin cover-up? Originally scheduled to air in May of 1994 on the Discovery Channel, “Conspiracy of Silence” was yanked at the last minute due to formidable pressure applied by top politicians. Some very powerful people did not want you to watch this documentary.

You may find yourself becoming angry or upset while watching “Conspiracy of Silence.” Many people do. However, consider that each of us has at times in our life acted out of selfish motives when it comes to sexuality and ended up hurting others in one way or another. Let us take this information not only as a call to stop this kind of abuse at the nationwide level, but also as a call to examine our own sexual relationships and make a commitment to deep honesty and integrity in our own lives around this most sensitive issue. Thanks for caring and may we all work together to build a brighter future for ourselves and for our world.

A copy of this videotape was furnished anonymously to former Nebraska state senator and attorney John De Camp who made it available to retired FBI Agent Ted L. Gunderson. While the video quality is not top grade, this tape is a blockbuster in what is revealed by the participants involved.

NOTE; This film had to be reassembled from remaining VHS fragments after an all-out effort was made to block the films release and destroy all extant copies. Every effort has been made to restore it to the original and complete “meant to be broadcast” version.

Related articles

• Boystown Sex Scandal: Conspiracy of Silence (Video)(promoteliberty.wordpress.com)
• DOCUMENTAIRE: Pedophilia (John DeCamp & Robert Green & Brian Gerrish & Corey Feldman) (ministerpresidentrutte.wordpress.com)
• Conspiracy of Silence 2007 (with additonal John De Camp excerpt)(planetizen1network.wordpress.com)

http://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/07/19/conspiracy-of-silence-banned-discovery-channel-documentary-note-disturbing-material-use-discretion-j-2/

The paradox of dirty politics and honourable politicians

The paradox of dirty politics and honourable politicians

3 March 2014

The paradox of dirty politics and honourable politicians, how come?

By Samwin J Banienuba

Politicians are no imams, pastors or priests (reverend or traditional) but the positions into which they are elected or appointed elevate them into stations of unqualified trust; trust that they will faithfully lead in good times and in bad times, that they will sacrifice sleep and ordinary pleasures of life for the common good of those they represent, and that they will seek most arduously to foster and cement the unity of their peoples when or wherever cracks emerge. This being the case, politicians put themselves forward as some of those conscientious people who have something extra to offer than the rest of us, and dedicated to adding that proverbial extra mile to push and extend the frontiers of equal opportunity for all. And once elected they wield the authority to take policy decisions, fix things and impact change for the betterment of society at large. It makes politics very serious business and an honourable career for that matter.
Of course, there are those who go to lengths and purposes to get elected for reasons of self-actualisation mainly. Having probably made it in business or other career ventures politics becomes the one last pinnacle left to be conquered as the ultimate finality of achievement. But even then, no politician publicly admits this as the reason for asking the mandate of the people. They will not be politicians if they did! On the contrary they point to career successes as living testimony to their ability to deliver in politics where others have failed. In Africa for instance, this calibre of aspiring politicians like to suggest they will be incorruptible if elected since they are already so well off the public coffers cannot and will never be a tempting proposition. And because they might well be better off in the material sense of the comparative they are also more able to oil the wheels of custom and run their campaigns with greater success than their less resourced contenders.
The hallmark is integrity! It is meant to define the personalities of those who seek electoral office or the offices they already occupy. Could this be the reason why Members of Parliament (MPs) in particular are assumed to be Honourable while Prime Ministers and Presidents are assigned the accolades of Right Honourable and Excellency respectively? In many parts of the world these titles are taken seriously, in Africa their inherent value sometimes supersede their actual relevance. Whatever the case, MPs are by parliamentary tradition deemed to be honourable and therefore supposed to act accordingly while Excellencies are assumed to represent the soul of the nation even if symbolically. Many are those of us who therefore look up to these politicians to inspire hope when all else is dim, to innovate and blaze development even when resources are minimal and to deepen human security in volatile environments in ways that augur freedoms from fear and want. They are Honourables and Excellencies after all, whose primary vocation is to make the art of the impossible possible. And for the avoidance of doubt they swear oaths of office by which they commit themselves absolutely and legally.
Such is the degree of politicians that when they are known to stray from that sacred oath in established democracies it becomes a scandal for which public enquiries are swiftly initiated and heads can and do roll for breach of the trust. What is often required instantly as a matter of course is for the culprits to do the ‘honourable thing’ and bow out voluntarily to avoid the more embarrassing public ridicule of being relieved of duties. Democracy is non-existent at worst or fledgling at best in a country where this is not the norm. A recent example is the so-called plebgate affair in the United Kingdom (UK) where the Chief Whip of the ruling Conservative government was alleged to have pejoratively called police officers ‘plebs’ for refusing him a bicycle ride through Downing Street in September 2013. The Police took offence that one who should be exemplary preferred to look down on a service that gives him and the rest of the citizenry protection. Although he vehemently denied the use of the word ‘plebs’ he also had to resign from office almost immediately while the heat of the altercation panned out and the law took its course.
Yet, it is no longer an open secret that most people think of politics as a dirty game in almost every polity. It is said to epitomize intrigues, conspiracies, plots and backroom shenanigans that often belie the righteous pontificating at rallies and other open platforms. Beginning from the moment electioneering commences or even long before, the politicians are the first to take aim and mudsling one another as they descend the gutter in foul verbal attacks in what often seems to be personality rather than issue politics. So dirty is it that wives and husbands are known to have advised their spouse not to enter into politics for the sake of the family name and pride. Indeed, one political commentator reckons that “Few campaigns in the modern era have been completely free of dirty politics ... the use of slander, libel, forgery, or other potentially criminal acts to embarrass a political rival.” He intimates that the only reason politicians hardly pursue legal action against each other is often because they are equality guilty of the same offence, birds of the same feather kind of.
It begins to nauseate when family members, friends and other known associates become legitimate targets in the politics of insults. In the run up to the 2012 elections in Ghana for instance it was difficult not to notice that civility was a major casualty. It was literally thrown to the dogs as the two leading parties in particular tried very hard to out-voice each other in a clear deliberate effort to cause maximum damage to the electoral fortunes of their opponents. In the circumstances lying through the teeth become fair play. When it is not lying about opponents it is lying in the name of promises. The fact that these promises are usually galore but mostly empty brings politics into further disrepute. In America for instance the three articles of faith have become the sky is blue, the Pope is Catholic and politicians are liars. To the extent that voters are no longer persuaded by promises and manifestoes but about the charisma of the personalities suggest some crisis of confidence in politics in which diminutive politicians are more likely to lose out no matter how better suited they may be.
However, the perception that politicians are corrupt is arguably the most damaging to their honourable status. The use of power for illegitimate private gain is perceived as the reason for which many elect to be politicians. In Ghana and other parts of Africa they are called “stomach politicians” in private. In fact the World English Dictionary derogatively defines a politician as a “person who engages in politics out of a wish for personal gain”. While it is true the severity of corruption varies from one country to the other it is also factual that no country is insulated from it totally. In 2009 for instance UK tax payers were scandalised by reported widespread abuse of claims for expenses that honourable MPs made over a long period of time. The fact that the Speaker of the House lost his job as a result and some MPS refunded the claims while others resigned or were jailed did not immediately clean the dirt from politics. On the contrary it became more muddied on further revelations that some more politicians employed and paid family members for jobs in what could easily be described as nepotism albeit they operated within the law.
The British example pales into insignificance when compared to Nigeria where corruption is arguably so endemic it no longer raises eye brows. Ratings of Transparency International consistently rank the African giant rather poorly and lowly. In a country where some 70% of the population are said to live below the so-called poverty line the massive oil wealth generated remain accessible by a very small elite only. Very few politicians are considered to be clean and it construes an equally dim view of their character especially that legislators are paid some of, if not, the highest salaries in the world. While colonialism and patronage have been blamed for the corrupt state of politics with a hint of truth it beggars the integrity of the country’s politicians and their sense of patriotism. It certainly makes mockery of the seriousness with which they take their oaths of office and validates Acton’s adage that power corrupts.
The “effectual truth” of politics once espoused by Machiavelli may still guide many politicians today but they fail to realise the age of the princes is long past. And if politics is make believe then what the politicians have succeeded in doing over the years has had an inadvertent deleterious effect on themselves, exactly the consequence Machiavelli did not want for the Prince. Candidly, it is not politics that is so dirty but politicians who are not so honourable after all.
The writer is freelance International Relations analyst and political commentator

http://www.ghanaweb.com/GhanaHomePage/NewsArchive/artikel.php?ID=302222