Subject: Re: An invitation to
consider joining a team of professionals to expose judicial unaccountability
and wrongdoing
What is entailed in
membership
in the team of
professionals formed
to expose judges’
wrongdoing and
advocate judicial
reform
or
By
Dr. Richard Cordero,
Esq.
Ph.D., University of
Cambridge, England
M.B.A., University of
Michigan Business School
D.E.A., La Sorbonne,
Paris
Judicial Discipline
Reform
New York City
1. Thank you for expressing interest in joining a team of
professionals(* >jur:128§4) who have attained
a high level of knowledge and skills, particularly in the fields of:
a. law(Lsch:1, 21),
b. journalism(ol:54; Lsch:23),
c. business(jur:97§1, 104¶¶236-237),
d. Information Technology(ol:42, 60), and
e. politics(ol:112, 58), and
can think strategically(Lsch:14§§2-3, ol:52§C; jur:xliv¶C) to expose judges’ wrongdoing and bring about judicial reform.
* NOTE: All
(parenthetical) and [bracketed] blue text
is references to supporting sections§ or paragraphs¶, and foot- and endnote superscripts, respectively,
found in the study(see next) downloadable through either of these links: http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf
or https://www.dropbox.com/s/rqw00v30ex3kbho/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf.
In the downloaded file, the blue text represents active cross-referential links
that facilitate jumping to the corresponding references to check them.
2. What team membership entails is that you:
3. Read as much as possible of the study of the Federal Judiciary
titled, Exposing
Judges' Unaccountability and Consequent
Riskless Wrongdoing: Pioneering the news and publishing field of judicial
unaccountability reporting(* >Prefatory:i).
a. 1) The reason for this is that Knowledge is Power and doing
one’s due diligence to know what one is talking about is the hallmark of a
professional.
2) The study aims to establish the exposure of judges’ wrongdoing
and the advocacy of judicial reform as the joint effort of a team of
professionals who work to the highest standards of academic scholarship,
intellectual responsibility, and public integrity. We want to be taken
seriously by judges, politicians, potential donors, other professionals, and
the reasonable person in the street.
3) We do not want to give any grounds for judges to disparage us
and dismiss our effort as that of mere ‘disgruntled losers’ who cannot read
with understanding a text, describe in writing a situation in a fair and
accurate way, or craft a convincing argument; as a result, lose their cases;
and then vent their frustration by whining and blaming the judges.
4) We have done our homework and have identified the key enabling circumstance of wrongdoing by judges: their
unaccountability. It is the result of their connivance with politicians(22¶31), and the latter’s
and journalists’ fear of judges’ retaliation(cf. ol:30¶9).
5) We have also figured out the means, motive, and opportunity(21§§1-3) for judges to
engage in wrongdoing(133§4), not only as rogue judges indulging in individual deviant
conduct, but also explicit and implicit coordinated wrongdoing(88§§a-c) among themselves
and with insiders169 of the legal and bankruptcy systems.
6) Coordination has allowed them to engage in the most harmful and
extensive form of wrongdoing: schemes(ol:91§E), such as their concealment of assets scheme107a-c, 213(68§3) and their bankruptcy
fraud scheme(66§2). Through coordination, wrongdoing has become the judges’
institutionalized modus operandi(49§4)
and the Federal Judiciary the safe haven of wrongdoers(ol:2§C).
b. By reading the study you will learn the elements of judicial
reform(158§§6-8).
c. Reading will enable you to identify typing, formatting,
language usage, and substance mistakes, and propose corrections; point out
passages that need to be clarified, completed, or updated; challenge
statements; provide more compelling official sourcesii and cases; and if
you are not a lawyer, enrich the study with your non-legal knowledge and
skills.
4. Arrange for presentations(ol:73) at law, journalism, business, and Information Technology
schools, think tanks, political meetings, and public interest entities,
intended to ‘recruit’ students(129§b) for, and persuade deans to offer, courses/practicums for credit
where to carry out legal, statistical, financial, IT, property registry
research, interviewing, etc.(ol:115) There will be presented:
a. the evidence of judges’ wrongdoing(21§A) and of the
President Obama-SCt. Justice Sotomayor and Federal Judiciary-NSA unique
national stories(ol:100). It will reveal the nature, extent, and gravity of judges’
coordinated wrongdoing(90§§b-d). Such revelation is a prerequisite to:
1) removing wrongdoers;
2) determining the necessary reformative measures to prevent,
detect, and punish wrongdoing; and
3) remaining with only judges capable of abiding by the reform and
having no vested interest in preventing and circumventing it;
b. the strategy(83§§2-3) of having students(ol:113§C), and professional and citizen journalists:
1) investigate(ol:66) that evidence;
2) provide a competitive incentive for ever more of them to jump on the investigative bandwagon(8¶¶26-27);
thus
3) launch a Watergate-like generalized media investigation of federal
judges’ wrongdoing; and
4) outrage the public at judges’ wrongdoing so much that the
public will force politicians, lest they be voted out of, or not into, office
in the mid-term, primary, and presidential elections, to call for, and carry
out, official investigations and judicial reform;
c. the development of an outraged national public into a civic
movement driven by the realization that in ‘government of, by, and for the
people’172, the people are the masters that hire all public officers, who
thus become their public servants, including judicial public servants. The
people can assert their right both to require that their servants perform their
duties transparently and to practice ‘reverse surveillance’(Lsch:2) on their servants
so as to inform themselves of their performance in order to hold them
accountable, disciplinable, and liable to compensate their victims(Lsch:10¶6). An outraged
assertive people can compel the adoption of a new We the People-government
paradigm: the People’s Sunrise civic movement(ol:29). This is a
realistic prospect, for its precedent is the Tea Party.
5. Contact journalists and media outlets(ol:88), including
talkshow hosts(ol:113§1), and identify candidates(ol:110§c) for public office who are, or are amenable to, running on a
platform of exposing judges, to invite them to a private meeting or a press
conference in order to make a presentation in which to persuade them to
investigate the two unique national stories(ol:100) and join forces with us.
6. Contribute ideas, contacts, and effort to:
a. the making of the proposed documentary(ol:85) and
b. the holding of the pioneering, widely advertised, and
trendsetting multimedia public presentation of, or academic conference on,
judicial unaccountability reporting and reform advocacy(cf. dcc:11).
7. Participate in collaborative writing and editing(ol:102), such as of:
a. the team’s platform(ol:109);
b. letters to student officers, professors, deans, and publishers(Lsch:1, 21, 23; a&p:1);
c. press releases (ol:111; jur:xlviii);
d. handouts for distribution at presentations and rallies(jur:xxvi);
e. a university course to teach and investigate judges’ wrongdoing(dcc:1,
23);
f. the Emile Zola-like I accuse!
denunciation of judges’ wrongdoing(98§2);
g. the brochure on judges’ wrongdoing and its templates for people
to describe their wrongdoing cases(122§2);
h. the editing of the cases(cf. jur:xxxviii) collected for,
and the analytical text of, the Annual Report on Judicial Wrongdoing(126§3); etc.
8. Donate and fundraise to help pay for:
a. the implementation of the above plan and
b. the start of the multidisciplinary academic and business
venture(97§1) aimed at Pioneering
the news and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting(2§2). The venture has a
huge market(8¶25) and its development can lead to
c. the establishment of the for-profit Institute of Judicial
Unaccountability Reporting and Reform Advocacy(130§5).
At this early stage, team membership is unpaid and holds out no expectation of payment.
9. Share in the many material and moral rewards(ol:3§F) available to
those who contribute to reversing and stopping the harmful impact of judges’
wrongdoing on people’s rights, property, liberty, and lives; and to making
progress toward the realization of the noble ideal of affordably accessing the
courts and therein obtaining Equal Justice Under Law. One of such reward is
being recognized by a grateful nation as We the People’s Champions of
Justice.
I welcome your comments, so I look forward to hearing from you.
Dare trigger
history!(7§5)…and you may enter it!
See also
or
On Sat, Aug 2, 2014 at 1:08 PM, Dr. Royce Mitchell <roycemit@flash.net>
wrote:
What does "joining the team
of professionals that should run the multidisciplinary academic and business
venture that I am promoting to expose judges’ wrongdoing, and advocate judicial
reform" actually entail?
Dr. Royce Mitchell, J.D.
Dr. Royce Mitchell, J.D.
On 7/22/2014 8:29 PM, Richard Cordero wrote:
Dear Att.
Mitchell,
I would like to invite you to consider joining the team of
professionals that should run the multidisciplinary academic and business
venture that I am promoting to expose judges’ wrongdoing, and advocate judicial
reform.
The foundation for the team and the venture is found in my
study of the Federal Judiciary titled, Exposing Judges' Unaccountability
and Consequent Riskless Wrongdoing: Pioneering the news
and publishing field of judicial unaccountability reporting; http://Judicial-Discipline-Reform.org/OL/DrRCordero-Honest_Jud_Advocates.pdf(see overview, id. >Prefatory:ii-iv; team of professionals, id. >jur:128§4).
* Note: All the references are found as active internal links in the
file downloadable through the above-stated link.
Examine the following salient manifestations of federal judges’
wrongdoing and the secrecy that enables it.
1. The Federal Judiciary holds all its administrative,
adjudicative, policy-making, and disciplinary meetings behind closed doors[29] and no press
conferences.
2. A single federal judge can hold unconstitutional what 535
members of Congress and the President have debated, voted, and enacted; such
power entails the threat to doom the legislative agenda of any party and
politician, including the President[17a], that dare exercise constitutional checks and balances on
judges, never mind investigate them.
3. In the 225 years since the creation of the Federal Judiciary in
1789, only 8 federal judges[13] have been impeached and removed[14].
4. Chief circuit[22a] judges abuse their statutory self-disciplining authority by
dismissing 99.82%(jur:10-14) of complaints against their peers; with other judges they deny
up to 100% of appeals to review such dismissals(24§b).
5. Up to 9 of every 10 appeals
to the circuit courts are disposed of ad-hoc through no-reason summary
orders[66a] or opinions so “perfunctory”[68] that
they are neither published nor precedential[70], mere fiats of raw judicial power.
6. Justices are unelected yet life-tenured, as are district and
circuit judges; the latter appoint bankruptcy judges for renewable 14-year
terms[61a] with no consent of representatives of the people. These
appointees decided in CY10 who kept or received the $373 billion at stake in
only personal bankruptcies[31]. The most insidious corruptor is precisely money![32]
7. About 95% of those bankruptcies are filed by individuals.
Lacking the money to hire lawyers, the great majority of them appear pro se[33] and, lacking the
knowledge of the law needed to defend themselves, they fall prey to a
bankruptcy fraud scheme(66§2) run by judges and other bankruptcy and legal systems insiders[169].
8. The overwhelming majority of litigants cannot afford to go up
on appeal, whereby the unreviewability(28§§3-4) of their cases affords judges the opportunity for riskless
disregard of the law and due process, and arbitrary decision-making(cf. Lsch:17§III).
If your bosses knew that they were entrenched for
life and could unaccountably(21§1) wield power for their own material, social, and professional
benefit(5§3), and neither Congress, the President nor the media
would dare criticize, let alone investigate, them, would such unchecked power, unbalanced due to lack
of penalizing consequences, corrupt them absolutely[28], causing them to abuse with a sense of entitlement your rights, property, liberty, and life?
From the hands of judges that engage in such conduct it is not
reasonable to expect to receive Equal Justice Under Law.
Thus, I have drawn a plan of action(Lsch:10§B) to expose judges’ wrongdoing and set
off a chain of events that can lead to legislated(jur:158§§6-8) judicial reform.
The latter is based on the realization that the people are the sovereign source
of power in ‘government of, by, and for the people’[172]. They are
the masters of all public servants, including judicial ones.
So, We the People can impose concrete new “terms of
employment” on judges and our judiciaries. Those terms can be contained in
legislation(jur:158§§6-7) adopted by our elected representatives, lest incumbents and
candidates be voted out of, or not into, office, as shown by voters’ ousting HR
Majority Leader Eric Cantor.
The new terms for employing judicial servants are intended to
bring about reform by achieving:
1. transparency,
through the exercise of ‘reverse surveillance’(ol:29) by the People on our judicial
servants and judiciaries so as to eliminate secrecy in judges’ performance and
in the operation of our judiciaries, and make them go about their business on
the same open-door basis as Congress, legislatures, city councils, and the
Executive are required to exercise the power entrusted to them by the People;
2. accountability, to
terminate Judges Above the Law by bringing them down to where the same law can
be applied to them that they are supposed to apply to everybody;
3. discipline, administered
by independent citizen boards of judicial accountability and discipline(jur:160§8) after removal of
the protection that judges have arrogated to themselves through the application
of the self-exonerating, abuse-inducing principle of “The King Can Do No
Wrong”; and
4. liability, so that
judges and judiciaries will be held subject to jointly and severally compensate
the victims of their wrongdoing.
I offer to make presentations(Lsch:9) of:
a. official statistics, reports, and statements[ii] showing judicial
unaccountability and consequent riskless wrongdoing(jur:21§§A-B);
b. the further(ol:66) investigation of
two unique, national cases(ol:55) that can expose judges’ wrongdoing; and a proposal for a
documentary thereon(ol:85); and
c. the proposed multidisciplinary academic and business venture(jur:119§1); and the team of
professionals(jur:128§4) who should run it as the precursor to the creation of an
institute of judicial unaccountability reporting and reform advocacy(jur:130§5).
You can contribute to setting in motion a process leading to
reform that begins in the judiciary on those terms of employment and extends to
the rest of government. A new We the People-government relation can
emerge: the People’s Sunrise(ol:29).
I look forward to hearing from you on the invitation to consider
joining that team and on what you can do to arrange(ol:73) for a
presentation by me to you, your colleagues, and the public.
We can proceed as openly or discreetly as you want. If the latter,
you can become this generation’s Deep Throat of Watergate fame(jur:106§c).
I encourage you to share this email widely.
Sincerely,
Dr. Richard Cordero, Esq.
Judicial Discipline Reform
NYC
