SCIENTOLOGY'S PTS SP TECHNOLOGY EXPOSED

SCIENTOLOGY'S  PTS SP TECHNOLOGY EXPOSED

L. Ron Hubbard discovered how to make a fraudulent religion from a law of nature, violating all copyright restrictions that natural laws can't be claimed as newly discovered.

The law of Cause and Effect is a primal law of the universe, because it rules every cellular reaction in all God's creations. When this primal law is manifested in the human or in an animal body or down to the tiniest being, it is then known as a physiological reaction or physiological phenomenon. Every action has a reaction -- that is what the law of cause and effect is all about.

So, he observed that when people where under stress, in traumatic situations, in combat, family fights, it would make people have reactions both emotional and mental producing observable physical reactions that could be seen, if one would just look closely. This natural law came down from when mankind just learned to socialize with other beings. It was a stimulus response survival mechanism brought down from millions of years ago. Every animal and/or creature has these same physiological reactions, except one -- the ones produced after they pass a misunderstood word--hahaha...

Admittedly we are talking about a man that saw a chance to use this natural law, as a way to make more money, rather than continue to write stories for a penny a word.

So from then on, he systematized and listed each reaction that he observed, and that is how the PTS - SP technology was first started.

Then he invented the scam of the new human being called the SUPPRESSIVE PERSON (SP).

He knew that all humans since time began, knew that to be around obnoxious people one would say "you make me sick". Here he saw that in about 72 hours (a delayed stimulus response)  the people would manifest different physiological reactions from colds to stomach aches etc.

“So long as a physiological phenomenon remains the knowledge of a few and is denied to the many it can be utilized to control the many.” LRH (from Journal of Scientology Issue 4-G from Oct. 1952)

The law of cause and effect in the human body explained:

[Noun. Physiological reaction – Is an automatic instinctive unlearned reaction to a stimulus.]
[Examples of physiological reactions: inborn reflex, innate reflex, instinctive reflex, reflex response, unconditioned reflex, accommodation reflex, Babinski reflex, belching, headache, migraines, swelling, sweating, erections, blinking, blushing, burping, defecation reflex, disgorgement, involuntary eye blinking, farting, skin flush, gag reflex, goose bump, goose pimple, gooseflesh, involuntary gulping, involuntary hiccup, knee-jerk reflex, light reflex, puking, papillary reflex, rectal reflex, regurgitation, shaking, shiver, shock, sneezing, startle, stretch reflex, suckling reflex, trembling, upset stomach, vomiting, involuntary winking, yawn, yawning -- plus hundreds more.]

But he knew that to expose this natural law of Mother Nature as his own, was to invite trouble, because he then could not claim copyright protection, so he claimed to all his Ronbots (brainwashed scientologists) that these were his own discoveries and wrote policy letters and invented the new human being now called the POTENTIAL TROUBLE SOURCE (PTS).

"That all illness in greater or lesser degree and all foul-ups stem directly and only from a PTS condition".

So, here he used the SP as the CAUSE and the PTS as the EFFECT.  Also known as CAUSE-POINT AND EFFECT-POINT.

From then on every illness, symptoms, mistakes, disabilities, and failures in the world (no exceptions) and every accident was ONLY due to being around an SP (like me):.

Then he observed that when you passed a "misunderstood word", or had "lack of mass", which just means you could not visualize what you were studying about or read a book higher than your reading level, called "too steep a study gradient", you also had a physiological reaction.

The law of cause and effect is in everything and every part of the universe, down to the simplest reaction in a microscopic cell. Ebola (parasites) is the cause, death by bleeding out is the effect. Get it???

“THE ONLY WAY YOU CAN CONTROL PEOPLE IS TO LIE TO THEM”. You can write that down in your book in great big letters. The only way you can control anybody is to lie to them.” – L. Ron Hubbard, “Off the Time Track,” lecture of June 1952, excerpted in JOURNAL OF SCIENTOLOGY issue 18-G, reprinted in TECHNICAL VOLUMES OF DIANETICS & SCIENTOLOGY, vol. 1, p. 418

When he had his brainwashed Ronbots convinced that their parents, relatives and friends were suppressive persons, he needed to continue his lies in order to control them, so he ordered that all people when they got any illness, symptoms, or made mistakes, had disabilities,  had failures or accidents to DISCONNECT from their innocent parents for their OWN PROTECTION!!!

But if a person tells a ethics officer who is investigating why he was sick, that there was no one else in the past three days (72 hours) except a staff member, that could be the only cause of his illness. He would instantly be declared a suppressive person on the spot.

The brain-dead Ronbots are convinced that all life is simple to understand --- that Suppressive Persons are the cause of everything – that to stay healthy and sane is to disconnect from loving parents and friends who oppose an evil and dishonest cult. Life is simple for the dead heads, as we have all found out.

The Ronbot has NO FREE WILL TO THINK. The Ronbot is prohibited from talking with us, reading facts like this, watching TV programs that talk about the cult's crimes, or surfing the Anti-Cult websites again for their own protection. If they disobey, they will be classified as damaged goods or PTS.

These links will teach you more about physiological reactions in Scientology.

http://www.studytechnology.org/10-barr.htm

http://e-meter-star.com/books.files/IHQS%20Pack.pdf

http://www.trans4mind.com/transformation/gsr.htm

But if you wanted to attack and destroy the cult or sue them the right way, you would expose the IRS connection first.

http://rundbrief.org/kd0044/archiv/sc-i-r-s-ology/copyrights/copyrightsindex.html

Then you would find that natural laws, such as cause and effect, and physiological reactions are not allowed to be claimed as your own laws. Much less invent a religion on these natural laws of God.

Then  the false God called RON, knew that he had to keep the scam so hidden, he restricted all people that were PTS from going to a medical doctor for any illness whatsoever. No matter the illness -- from cancer to Parkinson's Disease, to parasite infestation, all people that were sick were ordered to do the PTS -- SP Course over and over again until they never got sick again.

Even an emergency room visit to a hospital is grounds for an ethics hearing in front of an ethics officer,  for the complete investigation of why you were so sick you had to go get life saving medical treatments. This is the insanity of their PTS SP technology which has caused the deaths of many Ronbots, for being so brainwashed and made so blind that their brain can't see that the PTS SP technology is total and criminal fraud and is a danger to their lives.

And if they ever got sick again they will be refused the "Bridge To Clear" and forever kept as a PTS-SP victim. And as such, he will be a target in his own cult and any harm done to him will be allowed by the rules of fair game.

PTS: (Potential Trouble Source) – a person “… intimately connected with persons (such as marital or familial ties) of known antagonism to mental or spiritual treatment or Scientology” [Ethics. p. 201]. “All sick persons are PTS” [20 April 1972]. A scientologist whose statistics are down is PTS (or SP) [Ethics. p. 260]. The PTS is ALWAYS connected to a Suppressive Person [20 April 1972].

 * SP: (Suppressive Person) – a person of known antagonism to the Church of Scientology [Ethics. p. 201], its Tech, its founder, management, or their corporate goals [Ethics. pp. 309-315]. This would include most if not all ex-members and critics [Ethics. p. 311.], as well as the majority of the secular mental health field (aka “psychs”) [Ethics. p.264].

“A truly Suppressive Person or group has no rights of any kind and actions taken against them are not punishable.” “Ethics, Suppressive Acts, Suppression of Scientology and Scientologists” (1 March 1965).

Their policy for “Handling” a PTS person or condition is simple, but useless in the real world. Example: After they convince a person that his mother is an SP. He is made to disregard or ignore all arguments, scolding, strong confrontations, fights or threats, by changing the subject on your mother. Even when there is justification from your mother, relative, or friend or employer because you did something wrong and deserved the confrontation that made you sick. You are not confronting reality and are not helping the issue or reason for their anger. You are going to get fired by your employer for sure; or make everyone think that Scientology is nuts.

So, their “Handling”  just made you invalidate and disrespect your mother's concerns about your survival and devalued her worries and treated her discussions with you as worthless.

Today in the real world, Ronbots actually hurt and attack their parents, relatives and friends even physically and that is allowed because, everyone who is against Scientology is declared as a Suppressive Person in the eyes of their own laws.

The Cult is guilty of many crimes, including and without limitations: Copyright fraud, trade mark fraud, felony fraud, criminal fraud, donation frauds, misprision of felony, fair gaming parents and relatives of PTS and SP declared people, destruction of families, contract fraud, imprisonment, kidnapping, illegal search & seizure, breaking and entering private property, killing of family pets to punish a PTS or SP, abuse of power, harassment, stalking, felony stalking, cyber-stalking, slave wages, bias, sociopathic behavior, satanic practices, prejudice, racism, conflict of interests, personal agendas in official business, bribery, corruption, misuse of confidential information, violation of priest penitent privilege, violations of civil rights, aggravated battery, withholding evidence, cover ups, negligent homicide, dishonor in commerce,  false misrepresentation, criminal false pretense with intent, practicing medicine without a license, Medical Malpractice, accessory before or after the fact of fraud, and other criminal activity and more; not only to enslave the mind, body and soul, but to make the person give up everything that they can grab from you, including without limitations, all the love, protection and affections from family and friends.

The ONLY way to destroy the viciousness of the cult, is to find and expose their real weak-points to the world, which is the fact that their copyrights are in violation of copyright laws and against God, for he is the only true author of all universal laws.

$CIENTOLOGY KILLS

~LOYAL PATRIOT~ AKA THE RONBOT HUNTER

As always send this data to all Patriots for their safety, prosperity and survival.

Under communism you KNOW you don't own anything, under socialism you THINK you own some things.

"There is no religion higher than TRUTH"

--

There is one thing stronger than all the armies in the world and that is an idea whose time has come!

~Victor Hugo

“In the beginning of a change, the Patriot is a scarce man – brave – hated – scorned.  When his cause succeeds,  however, the timid join him, for then it costs nothing to be a Patriot.” Mark Twain

John F Kennedy once said – “Man will be what he was born to be: free and independent.”

The idea going around is this -- that it is better to die than permit your own government to humiliate, harass, rob and arbitrarily imprison, torture, kill and abuse their own citizens.

 "IF YOU WILL NOT FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS WHEN YOU CAN EASILY WIN WITHOUT BLOOD SHED, IF YOU WILL NOT FIGHT FOR YOUR RIGHTS WHEN YOUR VICTORY WILL BE SURE AND NOT SO COSTLY, YOU MAY COME TO THE MOMENT WERE YOU WILL HAVE TO FIGHT WITH ALL THE ODDS AGAINST YOU AND ONLY A PRECARIOUS CHANCE OF SURVIVAL, THERE MIGHT BE A WORST CASE, YOU MAY HAVE TO FIGHT WITHOUT A CHANCE OF VICTORY BECAUSE IT IS BETTER TO PERISH THAN TO LIVE AS NEW WORLD ORDER CORPORATE SLAVES."

"Rebellion to tyrants is obedience to God."

ALL RIGHTS RESERVED UCC1-308  --- WITH OUT RECOURSE

If you do NOT want to receive any emails from me, please let me know. 

WND EXCLUSIVE

GOP WAVE MORE MASSIVE THAN ANYONE REALIZED

Democrats left at lowest point in nearly 100 years

Published: 12 hours ago

 JEROME R. CORSI About | Email | Archive

 Subscribe to feed

• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

     2.5K

NEW YORK – The GOP “wave” Tuesday was not limited to Congress alone.

“This was a wave election victory for Republicans in state legislatures across the country, leaving Democrats at their lowest point in state legislatures in nearly a century,” Morgan Cullen, senior policy specialist at the National Conference of State Legislatures in Colorado, told WND.

“Even though the GOP was already at a high-water point in state legislative control, last night was a big night for Republicans in that the 2014 midterm election saw the GOP make important additional gains in legislative control.”

Voters Tuesday were deciding 6,049 state legislative seats in 46 states, nearly 82 percent of all seats.

State legislatures typically are the place where both Republicans and Democrats groom future candidates to run for governor, as well as for Congress.

Cullen noted Republicans have gained a net total of 332 seats in state legislatures nationwide out of the 649 seats up for election, with some outstanding races still too close to call.

Moreover, the GOP added majority control of 10 state legislative chambers, including the Colorado Senate, the Maine Senate, the Maine House, the Nevada Assembly, the Nevada Senate, the New Hampshire House, the New York Senate, the New Mexico House, the Washington Senate and the West Virginia House. The West Virginia Senate is now deadlocked and two chambers still undecided are the Colorado House and the Washington House.

In addition, Democrats lost their super-majorities in the California Senate, the Vermont House and the Maryland Senate.

Republicans now control 67 state chambers while the Democrats control 28. Prior to Tuesday, Republicans had a 57-41 advantage.

Republicans have complete state control – both chambers and the governor’s mansion – in 23 states, compared to six states for the Democrats.

“This was a big night for Republicans,” Cullen said. “If you had asked me before the election, I would have told you mid-term elections disfavor the party in the White House; and looking into my crystal ball I would have told you the Republicans were poised to pick up a few chambers here and there. But I would have said it was going to be a ripple, when it was a wave.”

Cullen said the Republican gains in the 2014 midterm elections were more significant than in 2010.

“To put last night in context, the Republicans had an even bigger night in the last mid-term elections in 2010, when they picked up over 700 seats in state legislatures nationwide and control in 22 chambers,” she said.

“But you have to put this into perspective and realize the Republicans had lost the three previous legislative election cycles before 2010 and the GOP was at a low-water mark going into the 2010 mid-term elections. The gains Republicans made in this 2014 mid-term election are even more impressive when you consider the GOP topped the high-water mark set in 2010.”

• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

     2.5K

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/11/gop-wave-more-massive-than-anyone-realized/#4LDYsRCfiDA1CmAV.99

VKD. NOW! About those ‘laws’ Obama makes all on his own protecting Organized Crime on Wall Street, the Security Exchange Commission, the GLASS STEAGALL ACT [not lawfully removed just set back in an old dusty corner hoping no one would notice], SHERMAN ANT

NOW! About those ‘laws’ Obama makes all on his own protecting Organized Crime on Wall Street, the Security Exchange Commission, the GLASS STEAGALL ACT [not lawfully removed just set back in an old dusty corner hoping no one would notice], SHERMAN ANTI TRUST ACT, CLAYTON ACT SEC. 8 [MONOPOLIES] .. circumventing the REAL LAW MAKERS.

Posted on November 6, 2014 by V.K. Durham Leave a comment

OBAMA WANTS TO MAKE LAWS ON HIS OWN? PERHAPS HE AND THE US [CORPORATE] HOUSE & SENATE HAVE NOT HEARD OF ” Ferdinand Pecora’s Investigation of the Great Crash Forever Changed American Finance”

READ: Ferdinand Pecora – Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Pecora

Pecora’s investigations highlighted the contrast between the … Chelsea House. … The Hellhound of Wall Street: How Ferdinand Pecora’s Investigation
Washington[edit]

Ferdinand Pecora was appointed Chief Counsel to the U.S. Senate’s Committee on Banking and Currency in January 1933, the last months of the Herbert Hoover presidency by its outgoing Republican chairman, Peter Norbeck, and continued under Democratic chairman Duncan Fletcher, following the 1932 election that swept Franklin D. Roosevelt into the U.S. presidency and gave the Democratic Party control of the Senate.

The Senate committee hearings that Pecora led probed the causes of the Wall Street Crash of 1929 that launched a major reform of the American financial system. Pecora, aided by John T. Flynn, a journalist, and Max Lowenthal, a lawyer, personally undertook many of the interrogations during the hearings, including such Wall Street personalities as Richard Whitney, president of the New York Stock Exchange, George Whitney (a partner in J.P. Morgan & Co.) and investment bankers Thomas W. Lamont, Otto H. Kahn, Albert H. Wiggin of Chase National Bank, and Charles E. Mitchell of National City Bank (now Citibank). Because of Pecora’s work, the hearings soon acquired the popular name the Pecora Commission, and Time magazine featured Pecora on the cover of its June 12, 1933 issue.[1][2]

Pecora’s investigation unearthed evidence of irregular practices in the financial markets that benefited the rich at the expense of ordinary investors, including exposure of Morgan’s “preferred list” by which the bank’s influential friends (including Calvin Coolidge, the former president, and Owen J. Roberts, a justice of Supreme Court of the United States) participated in stock offerings at steeply discounted rates. He also revealed that National City sold off bad loans to Latin American countries by packing them into securities and selling them to unsuspecting investors, that Wiggin had shorted Chase shares during the crash, profiting from falling prices, and that Mitchell and top officers at National City had received $2.4 million in interest-free loans from the bank’s coffers.

Spurred by these revelations, the United States Congress enacted the Glass–Steagall Act, the Securities Act of 1933 and the Securities Exchange Act of 1934. With the United States in the grips of the Great Depression, Pecora’s investigations highlighted the contrast between the lives of millions of Americans in abject poverty and the lives of such financiers as J.P. Morgan, Jr.; under Pecora’s questioning, Morgan and many of his partners admitted that they had paid no income tax in 1931 and 1932; they explained their failure to pay taxes by reference to their losses in the stock market’s decline.

Pecora was a founding member of the National Lawyers Guild: Pecora resigned from the National Lawyers Guild during its third annual convention in 1939 after the vote against his resolution disavowing communists failed to carry in the national vote.[3]

http://www.en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ferdinand_Pecora

VKD. NOW! About those ‘laws’ Obama makes all on his own protecting Organized Crime on Wall Street, the Security Exchange Commission, the GLASS STEAGALL ACT [not lawfully removed just set back in an old dusty corner hoping no one would notice], SHERMAN ANTI TRUST ACT, CLAYTON ACT SEC. 8 [MONOPOLIES] .. circumventing the REAL LAW MAKERS.

Investigations & Oversight
August 1, 2013
Room Service in the Clink: The Case of the Consumptive Witness

Historical Highlight

May 24, 1972
The House Select Committee on Organized Crime

http://history.house.gov/Institution/Origins-Development/Investigations-Oversight/

Historical Highlight

August 25, 1948

The 1948 Alger Hiss–Whittaker Chambers hearing before HUAC

“All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States, which shall consist of a Senate and House of Representatives.”
— U.S. Constitution, Article I, section 1

PIC

President Gerald R. Ford testified before a House Judiciary Committee subcommittee to explain his pardon of President Richard M. Nixon on October 17, 1974. Ford became the first sitting president since Abraham Lincoln to address a congressional investigating committee on Capitol Hill.
View Larger

Image courtesy of the Library of Congress

President Gerald R. Ford testified before a House Judiciary Committee subcommittee to explain his pardon of President Richard M. Nixon on October 17, 1974. Ford became the first sitting president since Abraham Lincoln to address a congressional investigating committee on Capitol Hill.

The Constitution says nothing about congressional investigations and oversight, but the authority to conduct investigations is implied since Congress possesses “all legislative powers.” The Supreme Court determined that the framers intended for Congress to seek out information when crafting or reviewing legislation. George Mason of Virginia said at the Federal Convention that Members of Congress “are not only Legislators but they possess inquisitorial powers. They must meet frequently to inspect the Conduct of the public offices.”

Origins

The constitutional framers assumed that Congress would conduct investigations as the British House of Commons conducted them. James Wilson of Pennsylvania, a future Supreme Court Justice and Convention delegate, wrote in a 1774 essay that members of the Commons were considered “grand inquisitors of the realm. The proudest ministers of the proudest monarchs have trembled at their censures; and have appeared at the bar of the house, to give an account of their conduct, and ask pardon for their faults.” When the U.S. House convened in 1789, it established an early set of select committees, such as Rules and Ways and Means, to structure the legislative process including investigations.

Early Investigations

The House used its investigatory privileges in the First Congress (1789–1791). Robert Morris of Pennsylvania, the superintendent of finances during the Continental Congress and a financier of the American Revolution, asked Congress in 1790 to investigate his handling of the country’s finances in order to clear his name of potential impropriety. The House referred Morris’s request to a select committee, setting a precedent for future investigations, while the Senate had President George Washington appoint special commissioners and report back to that body. Representative James Madison of Virginia said that the “House should possess itself of the fullest information in order to doing justice to the country and to public officers.”

Two years later, the House authorized a special committee to investigate the military defeat of General Arthur St. Clair. This was the first time the House investigated an official under the President’s direct supervision. Several Representatives debated whether the House had authority to conduct such an investigation at all. Initially, Representative William Giles of Virginia moved a resolution to request that President Washington launch an investigation. But the House amended the resolution to create a select committee, authorized “to call for such persons, papers, and records, as may be necessary to assist their inquiries.” Washington consulted his Cabinet to discuss compliance with the House’s investigation. They agreed upon rules of disclosure that formed the early basis of what is now known as “executive privilege,” or The President’s prerogative to use private documents and unvarnished advice to formulate policy decisions.

Subpoena Power and Contempt

The House has compelled the attendance of witnesses since 1795, when it investigated an attempt to bribe Members. Indeed, early cases of congressional subpoena and contempt powers focused on the abuse or discredit of the House itself. Robert Randall, a real estate speculator, had tried to purchase what is now Michigan from the federal government and share the proceeds with Members of Congress who approved the sale. As a result, Randall was the first individual held in contempt of Congress. The House Sergeant-at-Arms was authorized to arrest him and bring him before the House, where he was reprimanded and placed in a local jail for a week.

Subpoena power for routine legislative matters evolved after an 1827 debate authorizing the Committee on Manufactures to “send for persons and papers.” The committee, seeking more information on reforming the tariff of 1824, wanted to conduct its own investigation given that voluntary testimony and memorials to the committee had been “in many instances opposed to each other, and contradictory as regards facts.” One Representative denounced the action as an “inquisition” and such power generally as “odious, and oppressive, in the highest degree.” Representative Edward Livingston of Louisiana said it was better to have an independent investigation than rely on voluntary testimony by “those interested to deceive.” Livingston said, “all our laws…would be better, more stable, more wise” if the House conducted its own investigations.

The House reformed and routinized its subpoena and contempt powers during the 19th century. Initially, it had authorized the Sergeant-at-Arms to arrest those disregarding the orders of the House and bring them before its Membership. After an 1857 case involving a reporter for the New York Times who was held in contempt for not divulging his sources for a report concerning potential bribery of House Members, Congress passed the forbearer to the current law on contempt (2 USC §194). In that law, the failure of a witness to answer “any question pertinent” to a congressional investigation would prompt an investigation by the Department of Justice, as well as potential fines and jail time.

Current Practice

Hearings are most commonly held for three reasons: to consider pending legislation; to investigate issues that may require legislation in the future; and, to investigate and oversee federal programs. They reflect the most important issues of the day and what occupies congressional attention. This means that Congress holds hearings on a variety of issues, from steroid abuse in professional sports to the use of weather satellites. Hearings have also been used to further the rights of minority groups. Congressional investigations not only help legislators make better policy decisions, but they are central to the system of checks and balances. Investigatory hearings can uncover presidential abuses of power and corruption, such as the Teapot Dome scandal in the 1920s or Watergate in the 1970s. But hearings have also been used for less noble purposes, such as the blacklisting of private citizens during the “un-American activities” hearings in the 1950s. While the power to investigate is broad, the Supreme Court has since ruled that Congress must confine itself to “legislative purposes” and avoid the strictly private affairs of individual citizens.

For Further Reading

Aberbach, Joel D. Keeping a Watchful Eye: The Politics of Congressional Oversight. Washington, D.C.: The Brookings Institution, 1990.

Barrett, David M. The CIA and Congress: The Untold Story from Truman to Kennedy. Lawrence: University Press of Kansas, 2005.

Minta, Michael D. Oversight: Representing the Interests of Blacks and Latinos in Congress. Princeton: Princeton University Press, 2011.

Ogden, August Raymond. The Dies Committee: A Study of the Special House Committee for the Investigation of Un-American Activities, 1938–1943. Washington, D.C.: The Catholic University of America Press, 1943.

Ogul, Morris S. Congress Oversees the Bureaucracy. Pittsburgh: University of Pittsburgh Press, 1976.

Perino, Michael. The Hellhound of Wall Street: How Ferdinand Pecora’s Investigation of the Great Crash Forever Changed American Finance. New York: Penguin Press, 2010.

Categories: Uncategorized

 

Edit

BACKGROUND ON “HOUSE OF CARDS” SECTION. 43.—FEDERAL FOREIGN BANKING ACT

Posted on November 6, 2014 by V.K. Durham Leave a comment

FOREIGN BANKING ACT DECEMBER 24, 1919. SEC. 43 …

http://www.theantechamber.net/V_K_Durham/ForeignBankingAct.html

Mar 9, 2003 – That which is due or owing by the government of a state or nation. …. as the Edge, or Foreign Banking Act, approved December 24, 1919.

Please be sure not to miss: Abuse of Act of Congress known as: The Foreign Banking Act, Dec. 24, 1919. Sec. 43 & Sec. 25. Abuse of Powers by The Federal Reserve Banking System “Trust”, empowered by said Act of Congress(?)

SECTION. 43.—FEDERAL FOREIGN BANKING ACT
(Law, Banking and Business. Copyright, 1918, by THE JOHN A. HERTEL CO., Copyright 1921 by THE JOHN A . HERTAL CO.)

VKD. PLEASE NOTE WHILE READING THE BEFORE MENTIONED.. I’LL BET YOU AS DID I found no where in the before-mentioned, the Act of Congress of The Foreign Banking Act, Dec. 24, 1919 whereas; Allowances for THE UNLAWFUL CONVERSION of THE GOLD COLLATERAL INTEREST DUE to the DURHAM HOLDING TRUST (TIAS 12087) or the murder of the former CEO of COSMOS SEAFOOD ENERGY MARKETING, LTD; Russell Herman, or the FORGERY of his signature, or the Allowing of Agreements to SPLIT 50-50 with the AL QAEDA-AL KADDA, ABBU SAYEFF, MILF the “UNLAWFUL CONVERSION” Gold Collateral Interest.. Or the BRADY BONDS, or, or, or..–? Perhaps I missed something in that Act of Congress of December 24, 1919?

Something else I did not see in that December 24, 1919 Act of Congress. I did not see the allowance for the Federal Reserve Board Chairman to go outside the United States and set up a COMPETITIVE BANKING SYSTEM called the EURO DOLLAR with deliberate intentions of BANKRUPTING THE UNITED STATES DOLLAR with about “80%” underwriting in BOGUS BONUS 3392-181 GOLD INSTRUMENTS” written on our GOLD COLLATERAL, THE DEBT OF THE UNITED STATES “without our permission?” Did you?

to be continued later.. V.K. DURHAM, CEO

ALL CAPS NAME Paired w/Virtual Thumbprint Signature Shows Fingerprints of Corporate Tyranny

THE ALL CAPS NAME GETS A FACE LIFT – WHILE FREEDOM TAKES A SERIOUS HIT, by Bradley Loves

				THE ALL CAPS NAME GETS A FACE LIFT – WHILE F... The next step in having technology “controlling” our lives is already in place, and is being installed into the new smart phone and computer “pad” technologies. It ...
				View on jhaines6.wordpress...	Preview by Yahoo