Try this test to see if you are the next James Bond:

Try this test to see if you are the next James Bond: MI5 says all you need is to blend in, be tattoo-free and have a clean(ish) driving licence

• MI5 are recruiting new spies with the help of an online surveillance game 
• The tough game tests potential applicants' observation and memory skills 
• Game is part of MI5's recruitment drive for new mobile surveillance officers
• Job involves blending into busy streets and monitoring the public
• Tall people, those with tattoos and people who can't drive need not apply
• Starting salary is just £27,539 but rises after 70 days of intense training

MI5 are recruiting new spies with the help of an online game which lets members of the public try their hand at being the next James Bond.

The game puts people to the test as part of the spy agency's recruitment drive to take on new mobile surveillance officers.

Potential applicants' observation, memory skills and attention to detail are measured to give an indication of whether they have what it takes to be MI5's next top spy.

Scroll down for video 

+5

Spy games: MI5 are recruiting new spies with the help of an online game which tests potential applicants' observation skills

+5

The game is part of MI5's recruitment drive for new mobile surveillance officers, but people who are too tall or have visible tattoos need not apply

The three tests, which involve remembering the colours of vehicles passing by and recalling exact details of overhead questions, are part of the security services' advertisment for new mobile surveillance officers.

A map reading quiz is also playable on the MI5 website, with the ability to read an A-Z crucial for the role.

Applicants should be warned they will not be able to afford too many martinis - shaken, stirred or in any form - on the annual salary of £27,539, which rises to £31,138 after the intense 70-day training period.

The job description is very particular, with height restrictions meaning any men taller than 6ft 1ins and women over 5ft 8ins need not apply as they may stand out from the crowd. 

The same goes for anyone with visible with tattoos, and all applicants must have no more than six points on their driving licence.

The advert states: 'You’ll need to be highly observant – and be able to accurately remember the details of everything you’ve seen and heard. 

MI5 Director General shares information on career opportunities

+5

The three tests involve remembering the colours of vehicles passing by and recalling exact details of overhead questions

+5

Memory skills are measured to give an indication of whether members of the public have what it takes to be a spy

+5

Be the next James Bond: MI5 want recruits to be alert at all times and ready to pounce when duty calls 

'You’ll need to drive regularly and be confident on all sorts of roads (urban, rural and motorway) at all times of the day and night. 

'You should be able to easily navigate yourself between two different points using an ‘A-Z’ or Philip’s Navigator Britain style road map.  

The job does not sound the most glamorous, with most of the time spent sitting in or walking around London, observing the public.

However, MI5 are very clear that new recruits must be alert at all times and be ready to leap into action if duty calls.

'You’ll need to be able to remain completely alert for long spells of inactivity and then be able to step up several gears when it all starts happening,' the job description says.

'Things can happen fast in this role. You’ll need to be able to make sound judgements on the spur of the moment.'

Applicants also need to be adept with IT systems as surveillance and communication technology is an integral part of the role.

To apply for the job, click here.

TEXAS GOV RICK PERRY LEAVES SCRIPTURE FOR GOVERNOR ELECT

Texas’ Governor-Elect Reveals the Message That Rick Perry Left For Him Inside This Coveted Bible

   
Jan. 19, 2015 3:27pm Billy Hallowell

Outgoing Texas Gov. Rick Perry kept tradition alive on Monday by handing over a coveted copy of the Bible to Governor-elect Greg Abbott — but not before he followed his predecessors in placing some special markers inside of the holy book.

As has been a gubernatorial tradition for decades, Perry underlined scripture inside of the book for the incoming governor to ruminate on, selecting the wisdom present in Matthew 20:25-28.

“Each Texas Gov. marks a Bible passage for their successor.

Here’s what @GovernorPerry marked for me from Matthew,” Abbott wrote on his Twitter account, including a picture of the selected scripture.

Perry also included the words “Marked by Rick Perry for Greg Abbott 20 Jan. 15″ on the page where the verses are underlined.

The scripture reference reads, “But Jesus called them unto him, and said, Ye know that the princes of the Gentiles exercise dominion over them, and they that are great exercise authority upon them. But it shall not be so among you: but whosoever will be great among you, let him be your minister; And whosoever will be chief among you, let him be your servant: Even as the Son of man came not to be ministered unto, but to minister, and to give his life a ransom for many.”

These verses have been interpreted by some to mean that those in authority should help and serve those whom they oversee.

http://www.theblaze.com/stories/2015/01/19/texas-governor-elect-reveals-the-message-that-rick-perry-left-for-him-inside-this-coveted-bible/

VACCINATION IS YOUR LEGAL CHOICE!!!!!!

How to Avoid ‘Mandatory’ Vaccinations Through Exemption

Vaccination is Your Legal Choice


Contrary to what state legislatures may lead you to believe, no one has the legal or moral authority to force you or your child into receiving a vaccine. While the State has the legal authority to fully establish the use of vaccines, to receive a vaccination treatment requires your voluntary and informed consent.

Therefore, despite the tricky wording of school officials and mainstream public health workers, there are a number of ways in which you can exempt yourself from receiving the ‘required’ vaccinations as set by school districts and workplaces.

In 1905, the U.S. Supreme Court allowed states to pass laws ‘requiring’ citizens to receive certain vaccines. Today, all 50 states have passed vaccine laws that ‘require’ proof of vaccination in order to attend daycare, elementary, junior and high school and college.

What is oftentimes kept from you is the fact that all 50 states have medical exemptions from this rule, 48 states have religious exemptions, and 18 states allow for a philosophical or conscientious belief exemption.

To see what your state vaccine law says and how to apply for the appropriate exemption, check out the State Law & Vaccine Requirements page at the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC).

Vaccination and U.S. Law: A Brief Summary

Medical Exemptions: All 50 states allow medical exemption to vaccination. Medical exemptions to vaccination must be written by a medical doctor (M.D.) or doctor of osteopathy (D.O.) and are usually reviewed annually by school or state health officials.

Since 1986, the Centers for Disease Control (CDC) and American Academy of Pediatrics (AAP) have eliminated most officially recognized medical reasons for withholding vaccination (contraindications) so that almost no medical condition qualifies for a medical exemption to vaccination.

In most states, school or state public health officials can question or even deny a medical exemption to vaccination written by a doctor if it does not strictly conform to CDC and AAP contraindication guidelines

Religious Exemptions: All but two states (West Virginia and Mississippi) allow religious exemption to vaccination. These exemptions are worded differently in different states and require different forms of written documentation that must be submitted to state governments supporting a sincerely held religious belief opposing vaccination.

Some states require a notarized affidavit or letter from a spiritual advisor attesting to the sincerity of a person’s religious beliefs about vaccination. The religious exemption is under attack and, in some states like New York, parents are being grilled about the sincerity of their religious beliefs by state officials and denied religious exemptions to vaccination so their partially or completely unvaccinated children cannot attend public schools.

Conscientious Belief Exemptions: 18 states allow conscientious, personal or philosophical belief exemption to vaccination. These states come the closest to protecting a citizen’s right to exercise voluntary, informed consent to vaccination in America.

They are: Arizona, California, Colorado, Idaho, Louisiana, Maine, Michigan, Minnesota, New Mexico, North Dakota, Ohio, Oklahoma, Rhode Island, Texas, Utah, Vermont, Washington and Wisconsin

Vaccine Exemptions for Military Personnel: All branches of the U.S. Armed Services provide medical and religious exemptions to vaccination, but those exemptions must be first declared before enlistment in the military.

If a military recruit does not clearly state a medical or religious objection to vaccination BEFORE joining the military, he or she gives up the right to object to vaccination during active military service.  

Failure to obey an order to vaccinate while on active military duty can result in demotion, imprisonment and involuntary discharge from the military, including dishonorable discharge. After enlistment, legal assistance is often required to successfully object to vaccination without being subjected to sanctions.

  

TO VACCINATE OR NOT? YOU SHOULD BE IN CHARGE OF YOUR BODY!!!!

U.S. Supreme Court Upholds Mandatory Vaccinations

Refusing a plea to overturn the archaic rule

 

If you were a parent who has researched vaccine dangers compulsively as a means to protect your child from questionable adjuvants and known neurotoxins, what would you do if a US Supreme Court told you that you had no ‘right’ to refuse vaccines for your child? Well, a New York court made such a determination long ago, and recently refused the plea of a plaintiff who tried to overturn the archaic decision.

In Jacobson [v. Massachusetts], all children who attend New York pubic schools can be ‘forced’ to be vaccinated, according to a 2^nd circuit court of law. The law was determined in 1905 but was recently challenged by Dina Check, the plaintiff who decided that her Catholic religion gave her a right to determine whether or not her child should be vaccinated.

While religious leanings are a fine reason to refuse a vaccination – the court also determined against her in the case because there was ‘strong evidence’ that her refusal vaccines were due to her fear of them being harmful, and not due to her religious beliefs.

Unfortunately, it’s true that  vaccines can potentially cause unwanted problems, as outlined even by the CDC’s Vaccine Adverse Event reports. Vaccine could lead to reproductive health damage, hampered child development, and other neurological disorders.

This is no less abhorrent than the teenage girl who was recently told by a court of law that she HAD to get chemotherapy for her cancer treatment. Really? 

How can the nations of the free make such an enforcement on its citizens?

Read: How to Avoid Mandatory Vaccinations Through Exemption

17-year old Cassandra has Hodgkin’s Lymphoma, but she says she doesn’t want chemotherapy because though she has had few side effects with her first few treatments:

“That doesn’t mean as the chemo continues things don’t get worse, but I’m more concerned about the long-term side effects, and also the fact that I don’t want these drugs in my body, but they are and it disgusts me.

“Everyone including myself should have the given right to say what you do or don’t want to be done to their body.”

Whether you believe in these types of medical intervention or not, your rights are being stripped from you.

There are currently 58 bills in 24 different states that would limit your rights when it comes to vaccines, and in some cases, you would be forced or face jail time or have your children taken from you by Child Protective Services.

This should also cause a moment of reflection since the US has an extremely high infant mortality rate (and we start vaccinating our babies before they even reach 12 months old).

Furthermore, U.S. law protects vaccine manufacturers from any liability due to faulty vaccines – not the people who suffer from them.

I hope Dina Check appeals, and so does the 17-year old Hodgkin’s patient.

Your health is your right!!!!

 

AMERICA'S POLICE CASH GRAB

   

American shakedown: Police won't charge you, but they'll grab your money

 

U.S. police are operating a coordinated scheme to seize as much of the public’s cash as they can

 

 

  

In the U.S., a cash-grab by police and government is dressed up in terms like “interdiction and forfeiture,” or “the equitable sharing program.” (CBC)

 

On its official website, the Canadian government informs its citizens that “there is no limit to the amount of money that you may legally take into or out of the United States.” Nonetheless, it adds, banking in the U.S. can be difficult for non-residents, so Canadians shouldn’t carry large amounts of cash.

That last bit is excellent advice, but for an entirely different reason than the one Ottawa cites.

There’s a shakedown going on in the U.S., and the perps are in uniform.

Across America, law enforcement officers — from federal agents to state troopers right down to sheriffs in one-street backwaters — are operating a vast, co-ordinated scheme to grab as much of the public’s cash as they can; “hand over fist,” to use the words of one police trainer.

ROADSIDE SEIZURE

It usually starts on the road somewhere. An officer pulls you over for some minor infraction — changing lanes without proper signaling, following the car ahead too closely, straddling lanes. The offence is irrelevant.

Then the police officer wants to chat, asking questions about where you’re going or where you came from, and why. He’ll peer into your car, then perhaps ask permission to search it, citing the need for vigilance against terrorist weaponry or drugs.

What he’s really looking for, though, is money.

'Authorities claim it’s legal, but some prosecutors and judges have called it what it is: abuse. In any case, it’s a nasty American reality.'

And if you were foolish (or intimidated) enough to have consented to the search, and you’re carrying any significant amount of cash, you are now likely to lose it.

The officer will probably produce a waiver, saying that if you just sign over the money then the whole matter will just disappear, and you’ll be able to go on your way.

Refuse to sign it, and he may take the cash anyway, proclaiming it the probable proceeds of drugs or some other crime.

Either way, you almost certainly won’t be charged with anything.  The objective is to take your money, not burden the system.

You’ll have the right to seek its return in court, but of course that will mean big lawyer’s fees, and legally documenting exactly where the money came from. You will need to prove you are not a drug dealer or a terrorist.

It might take a year or two. And several trips back to the jurisdiction where you were pulled over. Sorry.

In places like Tijuana, police don’t make any pretense about this sort of thing. Here in the U.S., though, it’s dressed up in terms like “interdiction and forfeiture,” or “the equitable sharing program.”

Authorities claim it’s legal, but some prosecutors and judges have called it what it is: abuse.

In any case, it’s a nasty American reality.

POWERS AND JUSTIFICATIONS

Seizing suspected drug money has been legal here for decades, but after 9/11 police acquired a whole new set of powers and justifications and they set about using them for profit.

'The Washington Post this week reported that in the past 13 years, there have been 61,998 cash seizures on roadways and elsewhere without use of search warrants. The total haul: $2.5 billion.'

The Washington Post this week reported that in the past 13 years, there have been 61,998 cash seizures on roadways and elsewhere without use of search warrants.

The total haul: $2.5 billion, divided pretty much equally between the U.S. government and state and local authorities (hence the Kafkaesque “equitable sharing” euphemism).

Half of the seizures, according to the Post, were below $8,800. Only a sixth of those who had money taken from them pursued its return.

Some, no doubt, were indeed drug dealers or money launderers and just walked away from the money. Others just couldn’t spare the expense and time of going to court.

Of those who did, though, nearly half got their money back, a statistic that fairly screams about the legitimacy of the seizures.

So does another fact: In many cases, authorities offer half the money back – money they’d claimed was proceeds of crime. And when they do issue a cheque, they almost always insist their victim sign a legal release promising never to sue.

It would also appear police like to target minorities, who tend to be cooperative and less likely to hire a lawyer.

Civil rights advocates have documented all sorts of outright legal theft:

• The (minority) businessman from Georgia who was relieved of $75,000 he’d raised from relatives to buy a restaurant in Louisiana.
• The (minority) church leaders who were carrying nearly $30,000 from their Baltimore parishioners to carry out church activities in North Carolina and El Salvador.
• The young college grad with no criminal record on his way to a job interview out West who was relieved of $2,500 lent to him by his dad for the trip.

News outlets here have reported many such abuses over the years. But the Washington Post’s latest investigation exposes money-grabbing as big business.

It involves a nationwide network of enforcement agencies (except in the few states that have banned it) that operates with the help of a vast private intelligence service called “Black Asphalt” (police forces pay an enrolment fee of $19.95). The network uses consultants and trainers who either charge fees or operate on contingency, keeping a percentage of cash seized by their police pupils.

Police forces use the money to finance their departmental budgets, sometimes spending it on luxury vehicles, first-class tickets to conferences, and lavish quarters. They regard the money as rightfully theirs. One prosecutor used seized cash to defend herself against a lawsuit brought by people whose cash she seized.

It’s just human nature, really.

Give police the legal ability to take someone’s money, and to claim it’s in the national interest, and then tell them they can keep a nice chunk of it, and what other result could there be?

TRAVEL ADVICE

So, for any law-abiding Canadian thinking about an American road trip, here’s some non-official advice:
Avoid long chats if you’re pulled over. Answer questions politely and concisely, then persistently ask if you are free to go.

Don’t leave litter on the vehicle floor, especially energy drink cans.

Don’t use air or breath fresheners; they could be interpreted as an attempt to mask the smell of drugs.

Don’t be too talkative. Don’t be too quiet. Try not to wear expensive designer clothes. Don’t have tinted windows.

And for heaven’s sake, don’t consent to a search if you are carrying a big roll of legitimate cash.

As the Canadian government notes, there is no law against carrying it here or any legal limit on how much you can carry. But  if you’re on an American roadway with a full wallet, in the eyes of thousands of cash-hungry cops you’re a rolling ATM.

Wall Street banks slash FIFTY THOUSAND jobs

Wall Street banks slash FIFTY THOUSAND jobs and reduce bonuses and expenses as profits continue to dry up

• Wall Street's biggest banks have slashed nearly 50,000 jobs and bonuses
• Include Bank of America, Citigroup, JPMorgan and even Goldman Sachs
• Cuts, announced last week, come as profits opportunities have dried up

It is home to the world's largest stock exchange.

But now, Wall Street in New York has seen nearly 50,000 jobs slashed by its biggest banks.

In a move that has shocked many pundits, a number of banks including Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan have cut thousands of jobs, as well as bonuses and expenses money.

The changes, announced last week, come as as profits opportunities are increasingly drying up

+3

Cuts: In a move that has shocked many pundits, a number of banks on Wall Street including Bank of America, Citigroup and JP Morgan have cut thousands of jobs, as well as bonuses and expenses money (file image)

Although some analysts were left stunned by the financial and job cuts, others believe there were a number of warning signs in advance, the New York Post reported.

These include lower trading and commodities revenues, currency risks and the lower trending of long-term interest rates, In the fourth quarter, thousands of bank employees were fired.

During 2014, a total of 20,000 workers lost their jobs at Brian Moynihan’s Bank of America, while a further 10,000 were cut at Michael Corbat's Citigroup, formed from two companies in 1998.

Meanwhile, 10,000 jobs were lost at Jaime Dimon’s JPMorgan, Morgan Stanley reported last week.

And even Goldman Sachs did not escape the cuts - suffering a double-digit decline in revenues.

'Look, I think head count in the banking industry is likely to decline,” said CLSA bank analyst Mike Mayo. 'And if this environment remains, headcount would get significantly reduced.'

+3

+3

Job losses: During 2014, a total of 20,000 workers lost their jobs at Brian Moynihan’s (left) Bank of America, while a further 10,000 were cut at Michael Corbat's (right) Citigroup, formed from two companies in 1998

Mr Mayo went so far as to say bank revenues appear to be the weakest in eight decades - and are only likely to worsen given the current economic climate.  

'I think there have been heavy potential and paper losses at this point,' agreed Tim Quast, president of market analytics company, ModernIR, blaming the losses on plunging oil prices. 

He added: 'Clearly, nobody bet properly on oil. Nobody thought it was going to be below 50 a barrel.'

Bank of America, Citigroup and JPMorgan have also seen declines in bond activity. 

Read more:

• 50,000 Wall Street jobs cut | New York Post

AMERICA - YOU HAVE BEEN SOLD OUT LOCK STOCK AND BARREL TO THE ENEMY

 

MEET OUR NEW ASST. DIRECTOR FOR

US CITIZENSHIP AND IMMIGRATION

 

 

Meet Fatima Noor, President Obama's latest appointment to a high level position in the Department of Homeland Security, the post of Assistant Director for U.S. Citizenship and Immigration.

 

Ms. Noor has little, if any, experience in the compliance or enforcement fields. Her total experience in government related work is limited to volunteer work with World Relief Memphis and as activities coordinator the Tennessee Immigrant and Refugee Rights Coalition.

 

She majored in psychology with minors in Spanish and Arabic international relations. She recently completed a month-long research fellowship in Muslim psychology hosted by Carnegie-Mellon and the University of Pittsburgh.  Her research will be ongoing as part of her work the DHS.

http://muslimmedianetwork.com/mmn/?p=16040

 

No, this is not a joke.

RV/GCR THOUGHTS AND OPINIONS SUNDAY AFTERNOON

RV / RI  Thoughts From Ishman and TnDr at TNT Sunday Afternoon.....

1/18/2015

 

IshMan:  The RI Window from Tues Jan 13 through Tues Jan 20... 

 

As we understand:

(1) Iraq has met all requirements to RI its currency;

(2) Iraq has the authority to RI its currency having been released from Ch 7 Sanctions;

(3) Iraq's RI rate has been authorized through IMF & BIS, with international support, at rates from $3.22 to $3.90 per IQD;

(4) Iraq's GOI has been recognized by the US and the West as stable & unified;

(5) All central banks were fully linked and synchronized last Tues/Wed Jan 13-14 in anticipation of the RI release;   

 

(6) Iraq has released its RI for public distribution through the US Treasury process numerous times, having been given the green light by the IMF, BIS, UST, USA Executive, etc., only to have the US Treasury public release stopped for any number of reasons (valid or invalid as the case may or may not be).

So, if you're the Iraq GOI and CBI, and

 

(1) You want to RI your currency in the light of circumstances summarized above;

(2) You had just witnessed the Swiss National Bank decouple the CHF from the EUR on its own and without any prior notice,

(3) Your domestic situation is untenable with a disparity of rates from 1166 IQD to the USD to $3.58 in markets and on Qi smart cards across your provinces,

(4) Your population and Parliament are beside themselves with interference in Iraq affairs by the US;

(5) Your provinces are on the verge of bankruptcy and citizens are protesting missed payrolls dating back to Nov 2014;

(6) Banks around the world are exchanging IQD at rates of $3.22 to as much as the mid-$20's while your population waits for the US to allow your sovereign nation to RI its own currency, and

 (7) You have an agreed time among key sovereigns, central banks, the IMF & BIS, while banks and law enforcement agencies across the world are on stand-by alert (AGAIN) for and to release the RI with a window from Jan 13 through Jan 20;  NOW THEREFORE would you wait until the window was almost closed to "pull the trigger?"

I think not.

Or would you pull the trigger early enough in the window that you could pull it several times during the window to keep the US Treasury and US Executives honest in their commitment to publicly distribute and roll out the RI worldwide?

I think so.

IMO, Iraq has already tried, or will soon try, to pull the RI trigger before Tues Jan 20.

In fact, it would have made the most sense for Iraq to pull the RI trigger concurrent with the re-open of the ISX on Sun Jan 18, as it has implied it is wants to do.

Did it happen?

Are we waiting for the international markets to open Sun night / Mon morn at 12:00 AM GMT?

Will this release by Iraq have been stopped again and force a wait until next Tues Jan 20?
Why would the US Treasury and US Executive wait for markets to open next week Tues Jan 20 when the 3 day weekend after the CHF blockbuster last week offers such a PERFECT WINDOW and FANTASTIC COVER for an RI / RV?

Are the US Treasury and US Executive that "ignorant" or arrogant to let such a FANTASTIC opportunity slip by?  I hope we'll find out soon.
If it doesn't go now, there IS something

real rotten in Denmark 

TnDr:  Good stuff Ishman, well laid out and logically presented.

What doesn't get much talk or analysis is the political side here in the US and how that attaches to credit for this thing.....

Scenario - with the State of the Union speech Tuesday, maybe the much sought after credit for an economic turnaround is the focus by this administration.

If they can somehow tie this thing up in a bow and take credit on some levels maybe that is what we need to wait for?

Maybe some kind of announcement during the State of the Union Address on Tuesday, connected to this administration being involved in major changes in rules and regulations in international/global banking, etc.....and some big moves they are approving will help out the middle class.......

Just a thought. And, Tony said something about a big/global announcement on Tuesday.

 

             **********

Ishman:  Tndr. The Tues Jan 20 connection and previously planned Jan 22 nd announcements by worldwide central banks certainly plays into this.

And I agree with your premise that Big-O and the Dems would very much like to run on their policies having launched a true foundation for real economic growth. Great addition to the dialogue.

I think you are spot on the money here.

Seems like you've answered the question... and the description is arrogant.

For political reasons, which politics would have been supported if, the RI release was done on Jan 1 or even earlier... the RI has been held hostage.

True there were additional demands sought by the US from Iraq. And Iraq is better off for it.

Nonetheless, I believe the US has hurt its relationship with Iraq by not moving the RI forward earlier and continuing to apply pressure through relationship, rather than through "occupation" by camouflaged economic sanction.

In any event, let's hope between now and Tues we see the RI go public.

 

AMEN - ENOUGH IS ENOUGH IS ENOUGH.  GET WITH IT.

 

WHAT PARENTS NEED TO KNOW ABOUT SCHOOLS AND DRUGS

ABOUT SCHOOL CHILDREN – WHAT PARENTS NEED TO KNOW – SCHOOLS CANNOT PRESSURE OR COERCE YOU TO DRUG YOUR CHILD AS A CONDITION OF ATTENDING SCHOOL...
Dr. Mary Ann Block, Author of No Mre ADHD.....

VIDEO......   https://www.youtube.com/watch?feature=player_embedded&v=QgexCUFDOQc

Did you know—Federal Law Prohibits School Personnel from Requiring You to Drug Your Child?

Most parents are unaware that schools cannot require a child to take a psychiatric drug as a condition of attending school. Any coercion or pressure put on the parent violates federal law.

This law came about following CCHR’s documentation of numerous cases of parents being coerced/pressured or forced to give their children psychiatric drugs by school personnel, including parents charged with medical neglect for refusing to give their child a psychiatric drug. CCHR spearheaded a national campaign on this issue and by working directly with parents and the press, this issue was brought before state and federal legislators resulting in the Prohibition on Mandatory Medication Amendment which passed into federal law in 2004, prohibiting schools from requiring a child take a psychiatric drug as a requisite for attending school.

If a teacher or other school employee has concerns about or objects to your child’s behavior or academic performance, they are prevented by this law from pressuring you to put your child on a prescription drug and they cannot stop your child from being in school if you refuse to drug him or her. Click here for the portion of the law that you can print out and use as needed.

You can also use the below forms for parents and students of legal age to sign and present to preschools, elementary and secondary schools and colleges. They are an advance directive against having mental health screening conducted on students that could lead to them being referred for psychiatric drug treatment.

Parent’s Exemption Form Prior to Mental Health and Psychological Screening or Counseling.

Student Exemption Form Prior to Mental Health and Psychological Screening or Counseling.

 

ABOUT PSYCHIATRIC DRUGS

Click image for more drug information

 
Common Psychiatric Drugs Being Given to Children Are Documented by International Drug Regulatory Agencies to Cause Heart Attack, Stroke, Diabetes, Hallucinations, Violence, Mania, Homicide, Aggression, Depression, Suicide and Death

This is not opinion. This is documented fact by international drug regulatory agencies. Parents are quite simply not given the documented facts about the psychiatric drugs prescribed for their children, yet it is their right to have full information about any drugs being prescribed their child.

ADHD drugs, Antidepressants, Antipsychotics and Anti-Anxiety Drugs given to children have been documented by hundreds of drug regulatory agencies to have severe and life-threatening side effects.

Children are commonly prescribed drugs such as Ritalin, Adderall, Concerta, Paxil, Prozac, Celexa, Zoloft, Luvox, Risperdal, Seroquel and parents are not given any warning on the known dangers of these drugs.

It is for this reason that CCHR created a simple, easy to understand search engine on psychiatric drugs which provides documented side effects, drug warnings, studies and adverse reaction reports filed with the FDA in a simplified format.

ABOUT PSYCHIATRIC DISORDERS

Contrary to Popular Belief—
The Doctor Doesn’t Always Know Best



The child drugging epidemic that has resulted in infants, toddlers, foster children and a total of 20 million children on psychiatric drugs rests on one fraudulent premise: that mental disorders are biological “diseases,” therefore justifying the administration of mind-altering drugs.

The falsity of this premise is easily established by the fact that there is not one medical or scientific test that can prove any child has a mental disorder. Not one.

Behaviors are not diseases and drugs are not medication. This isn’t to say that children don’t have emotional or behavioral problems.  It is saying that without evidence of disease—a physical disease—children are simply being drugged to change their behavior. Psychiatrists know this—they admit this. Their own literature admits as much, but they like to keep these facts to themselves. For more information on psychiatric diagnosis, click here.

ABOUT NON-HARMFUL SOLUTIONS AVAILABLE FOR PARENTS

There Are Non Harmful, Non-Drug Solutions for Parents



There are numerous alternatives to psychiatric diagnoses and treatment, including standard medical care that does not require a stigmatizing and subjective psychiatric label or a mind-altering drug.

Although CCHR International does not condone or promote any specific practitioner, medical organization, practice or group, we have found the below resources to be helpful for individuals looking for more information on the following topics:

  

Safe Harbor — Find medical doctors (by zip code) who will treat people including children without the use of psychiatric drugs. http://www.alternativementalhealth.com/directory/search.asp

The Block Center — Find and treat underlying health problems in children and information on how children can safely get off of psychiatric drugs. http://www.blockcenter.com

DrugFreeChildren.org — Informational website on issues surrounding the use of “chemical restraints” on children. http://www.drugfreechildren.org

The Doris J. Rapp Education Corporation — Vital information on environmental factors affecting health in children and adults. http://www.drrapp.com

AbleChild — Parents for A Label and Drug Free Education. http://www.ablechild.org

American Academy of Environmental Medicine — Promotes optimum health through prevention and safe and effective treatments. http://www.aaemonline.org

Agency for Toxic Substances & Disease Registry — Lead Toxicity: What Are the Physiologic Effects of Lead Exposure? http://www.atsdr.cdc.gov/csem/lead/pbphysiologic_effects2.html

BESIDES WHAT THE GOOD DOCTOR SPEAKS ABOUT HERE .... WE AS PARENTS NEED TO BE AWARE THAT VACINATIONS ARE TOTALLY WORTHLESS AND THEIR INTENT IS NOT TO HELP YOU............ ALSO ............... WHAT IS IN CHEMTRAILS ARE HAVING SERIOUS EFFECT ON ALL OF US, AND CHILDERNS BEHAVIOR ISSUES HAVE RISEN DRAMATICALLY SINCE THE SO CALLED GOVERNMENT STARTED SPRAYING US...

 

I GUESS I AM RATHER CYNICAL SINCE I NEVER SAW THESE KINDS OF PROBLEMS WHEN I WAS GROWING UP.... THE ELEMENTRY SCHOOL I ATTENDED HAD CLOSE TO 1,000 STUDENTS WITH ONLY1 CHUNKY KID AND HE WAS NOT WHAT I COULD CALL FAT COMPARED TO THE CHILDERN TODAY.... NO PROBLEMS WITH DIABETES (EVEN THOUGH WE ATE A LOT OF CANDY) WITH REAL SUGAR, NO REAL BEHAVIOR ISSUES THAT A RULER OR SWAT PADDLE WOULDN'T FIX...

 

OUR FOOD TODAY IS ALMOST TOTALLY TOXIC WITH GMO'ED FOOD, ADDED POISONS .... JUST READ THE INGREDIENCE, AND LASTLY ...... PARENTS THAT WERE REAL PARENTS THAT TOOK CARE OF THEIR CHILDERN .... WITHOUT RUNNING TO THE DOCTOR FOR PILLS AND DOCTORS BS FROM THE FDA (FEDERAL DEATH ASSOCIATION).......

 

AS A MEDICAL INVESTIGATOR .....

I SAY WE NEED TO BE AWARE THAT WE ARE EITHER HELPING OR HURTING OUR CHILD OR LOVED ONES WHEN WE MAKE BAD CHOICES....

BASED ON UNINFORMED OR LACK OF KNOWLEDGE.