This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
Beijing celebrates Communist's WWII 'victory over Japan'
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Sep 3, 2015 4:49 AM CDT
The parade unfolds
in front of Tiananmen Gate in Beijing, Thursday, Sept. 3, 2015.
(AP Photo/Ng Han
Guan)
(Newser)
–
Tanks, missiles, and troops in lock-step filed past Beijing's iconic
Tiananmen Square in a massive parade today commemorating Japan's World
War II defeat 70 years ago and underlining President Xi Jinping's
determination to make China the pre-eminent Asian power. The spectacle
involved more than 12,000 troops, 500 pieces of military hardware. and
200 aircraft of various types, representing what military officials say
is the Chinese military's most cutting-edge technology. Helicopters
zoomed overhead in an array forming the number 70. Xi kicked off the
proceedings with a speech flanked by Chinese leaders and foreign
dignitaries including Vladimir Putin, though most Western leaders stayed
away.
To
underline China's position that its rise is peaceful and poses no threat
to neighbors, Xi pledged to cut 300,000 troops from the 2.3
million-strong People's Liberation Army, the world's largest standing
military. "The experience of war makes people value peace even more," he
said. "China will never seek to expand and will never inflict the
tragedies it suffered in the past upon others." The Washington Post
sees the move as one "that would accelerate [Xi's] campaign to
modernize the military, shifting resources from land to sea and air."
The parade is part of commemorations packaged to bolster the ruling
Communist Party's self-declared role as the driving force behind Japan's
defeat 70 years ago and savior of the nation, though historians say the
rival Nationalists did most of the fighting and the party's version of
events also minimizes the role of the US, Britain, and others. (Chinese
warships were spotted near Alaska yesterday.)
As election looms, Stephen Harper says recession is just a 'label'
By Newser Editors and Wire Services
Posted Sep 2, 2015 1:17 AM CDT
Prime Minister
Stephen Harper speaks during a campaign stop at a steel manufacturer in
Burlington, Ontario, yesterday.
(Adrian Wyld/The
Canadian Press via AP)
(Newser)
–
Canada has fallen into a recession, dragged down by falling energy
prices and economic troubles in China. The world's 11th-biggest economy
retreated at an annual pace of 0.5% from April through June after
sliding 0.8% in the first three months of the year, meeting the
technical definition of a recession, according to Statistics Canada. The
economic news could spell trouble for Prime Minister Stephen Harper
during the Oct. 19 election. Analysts call the three-way race a toss-up,
and Harper, campaigning for a fourth term on a record of economic
growth, refused yesterday to recognize that Canada is in a recession. He
says the economy is bouncing back after a brief bump.
"I
think it's more important to describe the reality of the situation
rather than to have labels," Harper says, calling Canada an "island of
stability" amid rough financial waters. The country avoided the worst of
the 2008 global financial crash and fared better than most nations.
Unlike the US, it avoided a real estate market implosion or credit
crisis. "We've had a couple of weak months, but the fact of the matter
is over the long haul, post the global financial crisis, Canadians know
there is no better place to be," says Harper, who has been in power
since 2006. Analysts say that in October, the left-of-center opposition
New Democrats, led by Tom Mulcair, have a chance to gain power for the
first time. (In Quebec, people are cutting their money in half.)
The fall of Rome was a culmination of several external and internal factors.
Great Wall of China
By 220 A.D., the Later Eastern Han Dynasty had extended sections of the
Great Wall of China along its Mongolian border. This resulted in the
Northern Huns attacking west instead of east. This caused a domino
effect of tribes migrating west across Central Asia, and overrunning the
Western Roman Empire. Open borders
Illegal immigrants poured across the Roman borders: Visigoths,
Ostrogoths, Franks, Anglos, Saxons, Alemanni, Thuringians, Rugians,
Jutes, Picts, Burgundians, Lombards, Alans, Vandals as well as African
Berbers and Arab raiders. Will and Ariel Durant wrote in “The Story of Civilization” (Vol. 3 –
Caesar and Christ, Simon & Schuster, 1944, p. 366): “If Rome had not
engulfed so many men of alien blood in so brief a time, if she had
passed all these newcomers through her schools instead of her slums, if
she had treated them as men with a hundred potential excellences, if she
had occasionally closed her gates to let assimilation catch up with
infiltration, she might have gained new racial and literary vitality
from the infusion, and might have remained a Roman Rome, the voice and
citadel of the West.” Loss of common language
At first immigrants assimilated and learned the Latin language. They
worked as servants, with many rising to leadership. But then they came
so fast they did not learn Latin, but instead created a mix of Latin
with their own Germanic, Frankish and Anglo tribal tongues. The unity of
the Roman Empire began to dissolve. The welfare state
“Bread and the Circus!” Starting in 123 B.C., the immensely powerful
Roman politician Gaius Gracchus began appeasing citizens with welfare, a
monthly handout of a free dole (handout) of grain. Roman poet Juvenal (circa 100 A.D.) described how Roman emperors
controlled the masses by keeping them ignorant and obsessed with
self-indulgence, so that they would be distracted and not throw them out
of office, which they might do if they realized the true condition of
the Empire: “Already long ago, from when we sold our vote to no man, the
People have abdicated our duties; for the People who once upon a time
handed out military command, high civil office, legions – everything,
now restrains itself and anxiously hopes for just two things: bread and
circuses.” The Durants wrote in “The Lessons of History” (p. 92): “The
concentration of population and poverty in great cities may compel a
government to choose between enfeebling the economy with a dole or
running the risk of riot and revolution.” Welfare and government jobs exploded, as recorded in “Great Ages of
Man – Barbarian Europe” (NY: Time-Life Books, 1968, p. 39), one Roman
commented: “Those who live at the expense of the public funds are more
numerous than those who provide them.” Class warfare
City centers were abandoned by the upper class, who bought up farms from
rural landowners and transformed them into palatial estates. The
Durants wrote in “The Story of Civilization” (Vol. 3 – Caesar and
Christ, Simon & Schuster, 1944, p.90): “The Roman landowner
disappeared now that ownership was concentrated in a few families, and a
proletariat without stake in the country filled the slums of Rome.” Inner cities were destabilized, being also plagued with lead
poisoning, as water was brought in through lead pipes. (“Plumb” or
“plumbing” is the Latin word for “lead.”) The value of human life was low. Slavery and sex-trafficking
abounded, especially of captured peoples from Eastern Europe. “Slavs,”
which meant “glorious,” came to have the inglorious meaning of a
permanent servant or “slave.” (“Great Ages,” p. 18) Discover more of Bill Federer’s eye-opening books and videos in the WND Superstore! Taxes
Taxes became unbearable, as “collectors became greedy functionaries in a
bureaucracy so huge and corrupt.” Tax collectors were described by the
historian Salvian as “more terrible than the enemy.” (“Great Ages,” p.
20). Arther Ferrill wrote in “The Fall of the Roman Empire: The Military
Explanation” (New York: Thames and Hudson Ltd., 1986): “The chief cause
of the agricultural decline was high taxation on the marginal land,
driving it out of cultivation.” There was a loss of patriotism, wealth began to flee the empire, and
with it, the spirit of liberty. President William Henry Harrison warned
in his inaugural address, 1841: “It was the beautiful remark of a
distinguished English writer that ‘in the Roman senate Octavius had a
party and Antony a party, but the Commonwealth had none’ … The spirit of
liberty had fled, and, avoiding the abodes of civilized man, had sought
protection in the wilds of Scythia or Scandinavia; and so under the
operation of the same causes and influences it will fly from our Capitol
and our forums.” More recently, John F. Kennedy observed, Jan. 6, 1961: “Present tax
laws may be stimulating in undue amounts the flow of American capital to
industrial countries abroad.” Outsourcing
Rome’s economy stagnated from a large trade deficit, as grain production
was outsourced to North Africa. Gerald Simons wrote in “Great Ages of
Man – Barbarian Europe” (NY: Time-Life Books, 1968, p. 39): “As
conquerors of North Africa, the Vandals cut off the Empire’s grain
supply at will. This created critical food shortages, which in turn
curtailed Roman counterattacks.” Debt preceded fall
Emperor Diocletian imposed wage and price controls and forbade people
from changing professions. Choking taxes and personal debt caused many
to abandon their mortgaged property and flee as ex-pats to live amongst
the barbarians, renouncing their Roman citizenship. Diocletian responded
by making it illegal to abandon one’s mortgaged property, thus
permanently tying people to the land in what became the “feudal system”
in the Middle Ages. Enormous public debt and government bureaucracy crippled Rome’s
economy. The Durants wrote in “The Lessons of History” (p. 92): “Huge
bureaucratic machinery was unable to govern the empire effectively with
the enormous, out-of-control debt.” In “Great Ages of Man – Barbarian Europe” (NY: Time-Life Books, 1968,
p. 20), Gerald Simons wrote: “The Western Roman economy, already
undermined by falling production of the great Roman estates and an
unfavorable balance of trade that siphoned off gold to the East, had now
run out of money.” Self-promoting and corrupt politicians
The Durants wrote in “The Lessons of History” (p. 92): “The educated and
skilled pursued business and financial success to the neglect of their
involvement in politics.” Richard A. Todd wrote in “The Fall of the Roman Empire” (Eerdmans’
“Handbook to the History of Christianity,” Grand Rapids, MI: Wm. B.
Eerdmans Co., 1977, p. 184): “The church, while preaching against
abuses, contributed to the decline by discouraging good Christians from
holding public office.” Violent entertainment
The Circus Maximus and Coliseum were packed with crowds of Romans
engrossed with violent entertainment, games, chariot races, and until
404 A.D., gladiators fighting to the death. Gerald Simons wrote in “Great Ages of Man – Barbarian Europe” (NY:
Time-Life Books, 1968, p. 20): “In the causal brutality of its public
spectacles, in a rampant immorality that even Christianity could not
check.” Exposure of unwanted infants
Roman demographics changed as families had fewer children. Some would
sell unwanted children into slavery or leave them outside exposed to the
weather to die, as was the practice till 374 A.D. The Durants wrote in “The Story of Civilization,” Vol. 3 – Caesar and
Christ (Simon & Schuster, 1944, p. 134): “Children were now
luxuries which only the poor could afford.” Immorality
Rome was corrupted with court favoritism, the patronage system,
injustice in the legal system, infidelity, perverted bathhouses, sexual
immorality, gluttony and gymnasiums (“gym” being the Greek word for
“naked”). Fifth century historian Salvian wrote: “For all the lurid Roman tales
of their atrocities … the barbarians displayed … a good deal more
fidelity to their wives.” (“Great Ages,” p. 13.) Salvian continued: “O Roman people be ashamed; be ashamed of your
lives. Almost no cities are free of evil dens, are altogether free of
impurities, except the cities in which the barbarians have begun to
live. … Let nobody think otherwise, the vices of our bad lives have
alone conquered us. … The Goths lie, but are chaste, the Franks lie, but
are generous, the Saxons are savage in cruelty … but are admirable in
chastity. … What hope can there be for the Romans when the barbarians
are more pure than they?” Samuel Adams wrote to John Scollay of Boston, April 30, 1776: “The
diminution of public virtue is usually attended with that of public
happiness, and the public liberty will not long survive the total
extinction of morals. ‘The Roman Empire,’ says the historian, ‘must have
sunk, though the Goths had not invaded it. Why? Because the Roman
virtue was sunk.’” Military cuts
Though militarily superior and marching on advanced road systems, the
highly-trained Roman legions were strained fighting conflicts from the
Rhine River to the Sassanid Persian Empire. Roman borders were
over-extended and the military defending them was cut back to
dangerously low ranks. The Durants wrote in “The Story of Civilization” (Vol. 3 – Caesar and
Christ, Simon & Schuster, 1944, p.90): “The new generation, having
inherited world mastery, had no time or inclination to defend it; that
readiness for war which had characterized the Roman landowner
disappeared.” Terrorist attacks
Called the “Scourge of God,” Attila the Hun was thought to be the
anti-Christ, as he devastated Europe with his half-million warriors. Aquileia, one of the largest cities in the world at the time, was so
completely destroyed that inhabitants ran into the ocean, hammered down
logs and lived on platforms which grew into the city of Venice. Ste. Genevieve called Paris to pray in 451 A.D., and for some reason Attila turned aside, sparing the city. Pope Leo rode out to meet Attila in 452 A.D. and persuaded him not to sack Rome, delaying the city’s fall 24 more years. Finally the barbarian Chieftain Odoacer attacked. Rome is considered to have officially fallen on Sept. 4, 476 A.D. Brought to you by AmericanMinute.com.
The criminal empire of the IMF/FED will fall, and it's fall will be spectacular. Unfortunately, the US is at it's epicenter.
The people of the US will receive no sympathy
from the world when it happens, simply because the fool US citizens have
voted for and authorized every illegal action of the sociopaths who
would rule the world.
Please listen to this video, and prepare for the inevitable as it comes to a head. You will not have too long to wait.
If Netanyahu is found to
be the “the great Satan” in the political sphere, how about his puppets
in the United States and elsewhere? Should they be named Satan’s kids
as well?
“You
mean I can’t summon lies and fabrications anymore to attack Iran? And
you mean nearly 100,000 people want me to be arrested in the UK?
Headache.”
Oh, dear. Netanyahu, the man who has numerous covert agents
and political assassins in the United States (Mike Hukabee, John McCain,
Marco Rubio, Scott Walker, Carly Fiorina, Lindsey Graham, Sarah Palin,
Dick Cheney, John Bolton, etc.), is shifting gear. He is on the move.
Netanyahu taught his disciples that Iran is the world’s leading state
sponsor of terrorism. Those disciples quickly began to repeat the words
of their master almost verbatim. Dick Cheney, one of the most lying
liars in the twenty-first century, has recently written that
“Under Khomeini, Iran became the world’s leading state sponsor of
terror, targeting the United States, our allies, and our interests
around the world.”[1]
The scholarly source for this extraordinary claim? It was nowhere to
be found. On the contrary, we have enough evidence indicating that Iran
has fought against terrorism.[2]
The irony is that under Zionism, the United States has had a long
history of supporting and abetting terrorism, and this is all done in
the name of “war on terror.” Don’t believe me? Let us look at a recent
example.
“Working
for the Zionists really pays. You get to hang out with chicks, pass out
classified information, and still get away with it. Thank God that I am
not Edward Snowden.”
Former head of the CIA David Petraeus has recently posited that the
United States has to make a sort of diabolical deal with Al-Qaeda in
order to defeat ISIS. Listen to the Daily Beast:
“Members of al Qaeda’s branch in
Syria have a surprising advocate in the corridors of American power:
retired Army general and former CIA Director David Petraeus.
“The former commander of U.S.
forces in Iraq and Afghanistan has been quietly urging U.S. officials to
consider using so-called moderate members of al Qaeda’s Nusra Front to
fight ISIS in Syria, four sources familiar with the conversations,
including one person who spoke to Petraeus directly…”[3]
The Daily Beast itself says that Petraeus seemed to have underestimated the monster which the Zionist regime has created:
“The tactic worked, at least
temporarily. But al Qaeda in Iraq was later reborn as ISIS, and has
become the sworn enemy of its parent organization. Now, Petraeus is
returning to his old play, advocating a strategy of co-opting
rank-and-file members of al Nusra, particularly those who don’t
necessarily share all of core al Qaeda’s Islamist philosophy.”[4]
This is really confusing because “In 2012, the Obama administration
designated al Nusra a foreign terrorist organization. And last year, the
president ordered airstrikes on al Nusra positions housing members of
the Khorasan Group, an al Qaeda cadre that was trying to recruit
jihadists with Western passports to smuggle bombs onto civilian
airliners.”[5]
It gets even more pathetic because Petraeus
“still wields considerable influence with current officials, U.S.
lawmakers, and foreign leaders. The fact that he feels comfortable
recruiting defectors from an organization that has declared war on the
United States underscores the tenuous nature of the Obama
administration’s strategy to fight ISIS, which numerous observers have
said is floundering in search of a viable ground force.”[6]
Remember that Petraeus was caught passing classified information to
his mistress. According to the law, Petraeus ought to be behind bars.
Yet since he works for the Zionist regime, he “still wields considerable
influence with current officials, U.S. lawmakers, and foreign leaders.”
So, the logic is pretty clear here. Edward Snowden passed classified
information to other parties and the Zionist regime wants his head on a
silver platter. Petreus did something similar, and he still gets to hold
his position. This is certainly disgusting. So, when I read Cheney’s earlier statement, I really
thought that someone should have doused him with a bucket of water.
Cheney must remember that it was not Iran that trained terrorist groups
such as the MEK in Nevada. It was actually the Bush administration.
In short, we can ignore Cheney’s new book in our discussion here, since lies and fabrications are its fundamental premises.
I wonder what Cheney would say to his political boss Benjamin
Netanyahu, who now isn’t moving toward aggressive expansion with respect
to the Iran deal. Netanyahu seems to be recanting from many of his
bombastic and acerbic speeches. Previously, he thought really deep about
bombing Iran’s nuclear facilities. In fact, he was planning to do
exactly that in 2010 and 2011?[7] But now he seems to be taking somewhat a modest views. Listen to him carefully:
“Allow me to make clear that
Israel is not opposed to a civilian nuclear program in Iran. We are
opposed to a militarized nuclear program in Iran.”[8]
Netanyahu obviously has good reason to back off. Almost 100,000 people have signed a petition
at the UK Parliament’s website calling for his arrest. There is more. A
few weeks ago, Israeli writer Bradley Burston has lamented that Israel
has finally become an apartheid state.[9] And then this:
“A US congresswoman has asked the State Department to investigate
whether the killing of two Palestinian teenagers by Israeli security
forces last year would preclude Israel from receiving military aid under
American law.”[10]
So, Netanyahu fears that the world is finally waking up. But his
seemingly conceding statement above still does not make any sense. If he
truly believes it, then what was all that talk about Iran getting
closer and closer to nuclear bombs? Why did he not clarify this issue
from the very beginning? Why did he and the Israeli regime spend years
brainwashing much of the West and saying that Iran was simply weeks and
months away from getting nuclear bombs?[11] Why did the Israeli regime ask the U.S. to give them a green light to bomb Iran in 2008?[12]
Moreover, why did Netanyahu convince dancing puppets like Sarah Palin, who were more than willing to chant “bomb Iran”?
Isn’t that a sign of madness? Didn’t Netanyahu, as former C.I.A. agent
Paul R. Pillar pointed out, “center much of his political career on
fear-mongering about Iran”?[13]
Perhaps the real prophet here is E. Michael Jones, who said last July
that “After 36 years of failure, the American empire now seems
determined to lure Iran back into the fold by proffering carrots rather
than wielding sticks.”[14] I do have many disagreements with the Obama administration,
but one can safely say that the administration played a crucial role in
destabilizing Netanyahu’s project with respect to Iran. As we have
noted in the past, it began with calling Netanyahu “a chickenshit.” The Atlantic quickly saw that it was a historic moment. The Atlantic titled one of their articles: “The Crisis in U.S.-Israel Relations Is Officially Here.”[15] Jeffrey Goldberg himself said then:
“Over the years, Obama administration officials have described
Netanyahu to me as recalcitrant, myopic, reactionary, obtuse,
blustering, pompous, and ‘Aspergery.’ (These are verbatim descriptions; I
keep a running list.) But I had not previously heard Netanyahu
described as a ‘chickenshit.’”[16]
Moreover, the Obama administration refused to meet with Netanyahu and
members of his cabinet on numerous occasions. This obviously indicated
that the administration was getting tired of Netanyahu’s nonsense.
Joshua Keating of Slate wrote that
“a ‘pro-Israel congressional aide’ told Foreign Policy’s John Hudson,
‘There is a limit to how much you can shit all over the White House and
expect to get every meeting you want.’”[17]
But long before the Atlantic came out with the report last
year, talking heads in Washington knew pretty well that Obama had a
history of humiliating Netanyahu (for good reasons). For example, the Telegraph reported in 2010:
“The snub marked a fresh low in
US-Israeli relations and appeared designed to show Mr Netanyahu how low
his stock had fallen in Washington after he refused to back down in a
row over Jewish construction in east Jerusalem.
“The Israeli prime minister
arrived at the White House on Tuesday evening brimming with confidence
that the worst of the crisis in his country’s relationship with the
United States was over.
“Over the previous two days, he
had been feted by senior Republicans and greeted warmly by members of
Congress. He had also received a standing ovation from the American
Israel Public Affairs Affairs Committee, one of the most influential
lobby groups in the United States.
“But Mr Obama was less inclined to
be so conciliatory. He immediately presented Mr Netanyahu with a list
of 13 demands designed both to the end the feud with his administration
and to build Palestinian confidence ahead of the resumption of peace
talks. Key among those demands was a previously-made call to halt all
new settlement construction in east Jerusalem.
“When the Israeli prime minister
stalled, Mr Obama rose from his seat declaring: ‘I’m going to the
residential wing to have dinner with Michelle and the girls.’
“As he left, Mr Netanyahu was told
to consider the error of his ways. ‘I’m still around,’ Mr Obama is
quoted by Israel’s Yediot Ahronot newspaper as having said. ‘Let me know
if there is anything new.’”[18]
So, Obama was basically saying,
“The United States is giving you billions upon billions of dollars
every year and you’re spending that money on things we do not like, such
as the Settlement? Well, I’m going to have dinner with my family, but
you are not invited. And then I have to put my children to bed.[19]
“Just give me a call if you change your mind about the Settlement. If
you still stand by what you said, then think about the title my
administration has given you. It is still on the back of our mind, and
you need to get used to that title, Bro.”
Netanyahu certainly was not expecting this blowback in 2015. As we
shall see in the next article, he has also received an implicit rebuke
from Vladimir Putin as well. Netanyahu is the epitome of what Hegel
would have called “the cunning of reason.”
In other words, reason, not Netanyahu or the Zionist regime or the
Neo-Bolsheviks in America, will inevitably win the war for the minds and
hearts of men everywhere. As Alexander Solzhenitsyn put it:
“Our way must be: never knowingly
support lies! Having understood where the lies begin—step back from that
gangrenous edge! Let us not glue back the flaking scale of the
Ideology, not gather back its crumbling bones, nor patch together its
decomposing garb, and we will be amazed how swiftly and helplessly the
lies will fall away, and that which is destined to be naked will be
exposed as such to the world.”[20]
[1] Dick Cheney and Liz Cheney, Exceptional: Why the World Needs a Powerful America (New York: Threshhold, 2015), 173. [2] See for example Trita Parsi, Treacherous Alliance: The Secret Dealings of Israel, Iran, and the United States (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2007); A Single Roll of Dice: Obama’s Diplomacy with Iran (New Haven: Yale University Press, 2012). [3] Shane Harris and Nancy A. Youssef, “Petraeus: Use Al Qaeda Fighters to Beat ISIS,” Daily Beast, August 31, 2015. [4] Ibid. [5] Ibid. [6] Ibid. [7] “Benjamin Netanyahu Wanted To Bomb Iran in 2011,” Forward, August 22, 2015; “Netanyahu Wanted To Attack Iran But Was Overruled: Ex-Defense Minister,” Huffington Post, August 22, 2015; “Barak: Netanyahu was ready to bomb Iran in 2010, 2011,” Jewish Telegraphic Agency, August 21, 2015; “Israel wanted to attack Iran’s nuclear facilities in 2010, 2011 and 2012, but backed away,” Business Insider, August 22, 2015. [8] “Israel not opposed to Iranian civilian nuclear program, Netanyahu tells Italian PM,” Jerusalem Post, August 30, 2015. [9] “It’s time to admit it. Israeli policy is what it is: Apartheid,” Haaretz, August 17, 2015. [10] “US lawmaker wants Israel military aid halted over Palestinian deaths,” Times of Israel, August 25, 2015. [11] Scott Peterson, “Imminent Iran Nuclear Threat? A Timeline of Warnings Since 1979,” Christian Science Monitor, November 8, 2011; see also “Benjamin Netanyahu’s Long History of Crying Wolf About Iran’s Nuclear Weapon,” The Intercept, March 3, 2015. [12] Jonathan Steele, “Israel asked US for green light to bomb nuclear sites in Iran,” Guardian, September 3, 2015 25, 2008. [13] Paul R. Pillar, “The Sources of Opposition to the Iran Agreement,” National Interest, July 25, 2015. [14] E. Michael Jones, “The Great Satan and Me: Reflections on Iran and Postmodernism’s Faustian Pact,” Culture Wars, July/August, 2015. [15] Jeffrey Goldberg, “The Crisis in U.S.-Israel Relations Is Officially Here,” Atlantic, October 28, 2014. [16] Ibid. [17] Joshua Keating, “Why the Obama Administration Is Calling Benjamin Netanyahu ‘Chickenshit’ Behind Closed Doors,” Slate, October 29, 2014. [18] Adrian Blomfield, “Obama snubbed Netanyahu for dinner with Michelle and the girls, Israelis claim,” Telegraph, March 25, 2010. [19] This was exactly what Politico reported. “Netanyahu Humiliated After US Trip Goes Awry,” Huffington Post, May 26, 2010. [20] Alexander Solzhenitsyn, The Solzhenitsyn Reader (Wilmington: ISI Books, 2006), 558.
I WONDER WHAT YOU THINK ABOUT THIS INFORMATION, PLS HAVE A READ AND PARTICIPATE IN THE POLL. THANKS!
Despite strong denials from Moscow, Russian airborne troops are
preparing to land in Syria to fight Islamic State forces. The surprise
attack on Monday, Aug. 31, by ISIS forces on the Qadam district of
southern Damascus, in which they took over parts of the district - and
brought ISIS forces the closest that any Syrian anti-Assad group has
ever been to the center of the Syrian capital - is expected to
accelerate the Russian military intervention.
Moscow is certainly not ready to endanger the position of President
Bashar Assad or his rule in Damascus, and views it as a red line that
cannot be crossed. If Russia intervenes militarily in this way, Russia
will be the first country from outside the Middle East to send ground
forces into the Syrian civil war.
debkafile’s
military sources report that discussions by the Russo-Syrian Military
Commission, which was established last month in Moscow to coordinate the
intervention, accelerated during the last few days.
Our intelligence sources point out that the concerted activities of
the commission are taking place amid the nearly complete paralysis of
the US Central Command-Forward-Jordan (CCFJ), where operations against
the rebels in southern Syria, including those holding positions across
from Israel’s Golan, are coordinated. Officers from Jordan, Saudi
Arabia, Qatar and Israel are attached to the CCFJ.
Most of the operations of the CCFJ have been halted due to a conflict
that erupted between the Syrian rebels and the U.S. Central Command,
CENTCOM. The US military is opposed to the rebels cooperating with
Al-Qaeda-linked groups, such as the Al-Nusra front, while the rebels
claim that this cannot be avoided if they are to defeat the forces of
Bashar Assad and Hizballah.
The paralysis of the CCFJ is spurring the Russians to try to show
that their “central command” for Syria is operating without any
difficulties.
In recent weeks, the Russians have taken four military steps related to Syria:
1. On Aug. 18, six of Russia’s advanced MIG-31 Foxhound interceptor
aircraft landed at the Syrian Air Force’s Mezze Airbase, which is the
military section of Damascus international airport. After the fighters
landed, they were immediately followed by giant Russian Antonov AN-124
Condor cargo planes carrying 1,000 of Russia’s 9M133 Kornet anti-tank
missiles.
The advanced jets are intended to serve as air support for the Russian units that arrive in Syria.
2. Before the Russian planes landed in Damascus, Moscow reached an
agreement with Washington for the removal of NATO’s Patriot missile
batteries from Turkey. The removal was carried out gradually during the
month of August, thus preventing the possibility that NATO Patriot
missiles could hit Russian fighters carrying out operations in Syrian
airspace.
3. During the last week of August, a large number of Russian troops,
mostly logistical teams whose job is to lay the groundwork for the
arrival of the combat units, arrived in Syria. The troops were seen in
Damascus and in Jablah district of Lattakia province, where the Russian
forces are building a military base.
4. Our intelligence sources also report that Moscow has started to
supply Damascus with satellite imagery of the ground situation on the
different fronts.
debkafile’s
military and intelligence sources report that all of these preparatory
steps by Moscow for the introduction of ground forces are being carried
out in coordination with Washington and Tehran.
The more that the three capitals tighten their coordination in
support of Assad, the sooner the Russian intervention is expected to
take place.
Pre-Jade Helm Document Now Surfacing That Explains How the Government Plans To “Master the Human Domain!"
Thursday, September 3, 2015 13:06
Lisa Haven
“The evolving nature of warfare indicates that adversarial military forces may employ individuals to operate within the local populations, refugees, and detainees to disrupt friendly operations.” (page 6)
“No longer are national priorities dominated by superpowers and nation states, but increasingly by loose networks of terrorists, transnational criminals, and other non-state actors within the “human domain.”As we have shifted into the new generation of warfare, the operational environment has evolved into a global operational environment favoring anonymous individuals who easily transform from citizen to enemy and back with limited logistical support or control.” (page 2)
Those are just a few of the MANY disturbing quotes discovered in this recently released 13 page report titled Identity Operations For Strategic Landpower: Mastering The Human Domain. The report was compiled by a group of government employed personnel who believe the real enemy lies from within rather than from other countries. Implying that their agenda is to target any political dissidents, patriots, Christians, constitutionalists, veterans, and any they deem as terrorists.
What makes this document stand out above the others is the fact that it was published in March 2014—though not released until August of this year—which means it pre-dates the Jade Helm “Mastering the Human Domain” drill by a little over a year. Therefore it is likely to assume the “mastering the human domain” idea originated from the document you are about to see in the video below!
I HIGHLY URGE you to watch it in its entirety. The quotes above and below are only a FRAGMENT of what the document harbors, and quite frankly it contains some pretty frightening information. But I must warn you, what you are about to discover will literally change your view of whats happening around us, and it will make your blood boil with anger.
Please, please don’t miss this one…
So how exactly do they plan on “Mastering the Human Domain"?
- Identify an unknown individual during tactical operations
- Track a person of interest
- Control physical access
- Share identity information
Furthermore…
Providing land force commanders and other decision-makers with robust and enduring Identity capabilities are necessary to combat future threats in these complex environments. Leadership considerations for Identity within the human domain include:
- Use of the enhanced capabilities to identify and classify the human domain; to determine whether they are adversarial, friendly, neutral, or unknown.
- Use of all-source intelligence analysts to provide back-end analysis and reporting to fuse the many sources of information (much received through operational reporting) regarding the human domain in order to identify individual(s) and their intent. Based upon risk, use of Identity data (and its fusion with other information and intelligence), will enhance force protection for bases, installations, detainee and checkpoint operations, as well as many other mission sets.
- Use of the enhanced capabilities to identify and manage local populations during major combat, stability, and humanitarian assistance and/or disaster relief operations.
Warning he would not allow the government’s spying on millions of
Americans through their cell phones to continue unfettered, a federal
judge in Washington, D.C., on Wednesday indicated he’s anxious to move
forward quickly in a case that challenges the National Security Agency’s
program.
The lawsuit was brought by attorney Larry Klayman of Freedom Watch,
who waited nearly two years for an appellate court ruling following the
initial ruling in 2013 by Judge Richard Leon that the program likely
was unconstitutional and nearly “Orwellian.” Klayman told WND after Wednesday’s hearing that the judge advised him
to request an expedited mandate from the appellate court and said he
could “proceed right now.” Klayman said the judge also advised him to
amend the complaint to address concerns raised by the Court of Appeals
for the District of Columbia. The judge said he would not let the spying continue. In a blog at Politico,
Josh Gerstein said that in an hour-long hearing, Leon repeatedly urged
Klayman to take steps to allow the case to move forward quickly by
asking a federal appeals court to formally relinquish control over the
appeal. The NSA program, which collects in bulk data on phone calls, is
scheduled to shut down at the end of November because of a change made
by Congress. Lawmakers ordered a transition to a new procedure in which
telephone companies will collect the data and make it available to the
government rather than having the government do the collecting. “The clock is running and there isn’t much time between now and
November 29,” Leon told Klayman, Gerstein reported. “This court believes
there are millions and millions of Americans whose constitutional
rights have been and are being violated, but the window … for action is
very small. … It’s time to move.” Klayman also told WND the judge instructed Justice Department
attorneys to make sure they were available at a moment’s notice when he
wants to move on the case. Support
attorney Larry Klayman as he mobilizes millions of freedom-loving
Americans from all over the country to stop President Obama’s spying on
U.S. citizens and to preserve our freedoms! Leon issued an injunction halting the NSA program in 2013, but he stayed it while the government appealed. Two years later, Klayman has gone back to Leon asking him to lift the
stay and impose the injunction because of the recalcitrant appeals
court. Just days ago, that court moved to overturn the injunction because
Klayman had not shown his data specifically had been taken by the
government. But the court also allowed Leon to rule on discovery in the
case. Leon pointedly noted the appeals court did not undermine his determination that the program likely is unconstitutional. According to a report in National Law Journal,
the appeals court had cited the complaint’s reference to Verizon
Wireless, when the government data program was set up to address Verizon
Business Services. Klayman told WND he would be seeking the right customer of that network to add to the amended complaint. Leon also warned the government he would be unhappy with any evidence that they were trying to “run the clock out” on the case. A large part of the case is over the NSA program’s secrecy.
The appeals court said the plaintiffs couldn’t specifically prove their
own telephone records were seized by the government, so they couldn’t
sue. But they cannot obtain access to such evidence without a case pending. Klayman said the case was the result of whistleblower Edward
Snowden’s revelations about the government’s secret spying on Americans. In a recent commentary for WND,
Klayman explained that the appellate judges, David Sentelle, Janice
Rogers Brown and Steven Williams, are allowing Leon to review whether
discovery supports the idea “the NSA had actually accessed Verizon cell
phone telephonic records and whether we had sued the correct Verizon
company.” He quoted from the earlier ruling from Leon, who said, “The NSA has
collected and analyzed [plaintiffs'] telephony metadata and will
continue to operate the program consistent with FISC opinions and
orders.” Klayman accused the appeals court of acting politically, rather than
judicially, and explained the NSA “was forced to reveal … that the
intelligence agencies routinely use their spy programs to spy on
innocent Americans and presumable coerce them into doing what the
government wants.” Klayman told WND he’s confident of prevailing “ultimately.” No matter what else results, he said, people are now engaged in the issue and watching the judges for their opinions. Leon’s 2013 ruling said the NSA program appears to run afoul of the
Fourth Amendment, and the Justice Department failed to show that
collecting the metadata on telephone calls helped to stop terrorist
attacks. Snowden blew the whistle on the agency’s vacuum-cleaner approach to data collection, called
“bulk telephony metadata.” That was earlier in 2013, and Snowden has
been living in exile in Russia as a wanted man by the U.S. government
ever since. Two of America’s influential civil-rights groups, the American Civil Liberties Union and the Electronic Frontier Foundation, have sided with Klayman. The data that the NSA collects, they explained in a brief, “reveals
political affiliation, religious practices and peoples’ most intimate
associations.” “It reveals who calls a suicide prevention line and who calls their
elected official; who calls the local tea-party office and who calls
Planned Parenthood.” The brief said “the relevant fact for whether an expectation of
privacy exists is that the comprehensive telephone records the
government collects – not just the records of a few calls over a few
days but all of a person’s calls over many years – reveals highly
personal information about the person and her life.”
The Pentagon sent this article out to
all military, members of congress and military retirees in their Early
Bird “best of the news.” There have been nothing but hoaxes and lies
coming out of the Pentagon now indicating that those running the
Pentagon’s news service are in the pay of a foreign government.
All of this has been timed to “put the
ketchup back in the bottle” after the huge defeat Israel suffered
yesterday in American politics.
Here is what can be proven to be true:
Chemical weapons used in Syria, including
Sarin gas, came from an Defense Department facility in Tbilisi, Georgia.
We have witness statements, photographs, plans for the labs, all
published in Russia and the US include a television documentary seen
around the world.
Turkish authorities have repeatedly found
chemical weapons facilities inside Turkey that supply ISIS and her
“sisters.” Turkey’s intelligence agencies have quashed investigations
but they have still been widely reported.
On the other hand, the Syrian Human Rights
Observatory, source for these stories has been exposed as being financed
by Radio Liberty and the CIA and managed by Booz Allen Hamilton, a CIA
contractor. We have repeatedly found the SHRO operating with ISIS
forces including recently inside Syria where their offices were above an
underground chemical weapons storage facility.
We now call for an investigation of Pentagon
complicity in a psychological warfare operation in support of the
Islamic State, the SHRO and the use of chemical weapons against the
Kurdish, Iraqi and Syrian people.
One last point: We have absolute proof that the
Pentagon has no intelligence capabilities in either Syria and Iraq and
actually receives its intelligence from ISIS press releases. If only I
were making this up. Seems like they are too busy tapping our phones here and scaring the
poor Texans with Jade Helm. This is why, wek before last, the Pentagon
was charged with supplying congress and the president “cooked”
intelligence on the Middle East. It is treason. The article below is from the Daily Beast, owned by Jane Harmon,
former member of congress and accused Israeli spy. Look that one up.
Where Did ISIS Get Its Chemical Weapons?
The terror group is suspected of
using mustard gas in a series of recent attacks, and a notorious Dutch
jihadi says it’s from Assad’s stockpile. But U.S. officials beg to
differ.
An infamous Dutch
soldier turned ISIS fighter says the group has acquired chemical weapons
once belonging to Syrian President Bashar al-Assad, resurrecting fears
that what was supposed to be
the regime’s destroyed program has instead fallen into jihadi
hands.“The regime uses chemical warfare on a regular basis these days,
and nobody bats an eye—yet when [ISIS] captures it from them and uses it
against them it’s all of a sudden a huge problem?”ISIS fighter Omar Yilmaz, 27, said in a Tumblr post.
“Fight them the way they fight you.”The post marks the first time a
public ISIS figure has declared that the group obtained chemical weapons
from the Assad regime. And it comes just days after the first series of
suspected ISIS mustard gas attacks in northern Iraq and Syria.On Tuesday, Kurdish forces said
ISIS fired a homemade rocket filled with chemical weapons at peshmerga
forces. In a suspected Aug. 21 attack in the northern Syrian city of
Marea, at least 25 people were contaminated. And on Aug. 13, Kurdish
officials in Iraq said
60 peshmerga were exposed to mustard gas in the northern Iraqi city of
Makhmour. Pentagon officials believe there is credible evidence that
mustard gas could indeed have been used in the two August strikes.Read more at daily beast (no link offered…too stupid for that)
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
Part of channel(s): 
