2016 Guns - False Flags - Roundups - Martial Law - Financial collapse

IS 2016 PLANNED BY THE 'GOV' AND UN TO BE THE YEAR FROM HELL FOR AMERICANS?  THE BEGINNING OF THE END?  THE REAL REASON FOR THE CONTINUING DELAYS AND EXCUSES  AND NOT ALLOWING EXCHANGE OF CURRENCIES?

2016 Will Bring Multiple False Flags, Gun Confiscations, Dissident Roundups, Financial Collapse and Martial Law

Friday, January 1, 2016 6:34

 

I absolutely loathe Facebook. When I go on Facebook to post something, it is a personally nauseating and revolting experience. It is something I liken to walking through a cesspool of filth and squalor. Then why do I do it? Because in order for the truth to be known, it is necessary to engage the enemy where they are at so we can spread the truth who and what is truly running this planet.

My persistence in posting on Facebook has serendipitously paid off. A few days ago, I was posting an article on mind control and its likely relationship to what happened with the 2,000 people rioting at the Kentucky Mall. Over 150 Facebook groups have graciously added me to their list and I had posted about 15 posts on this topic, when Facebook pulled the plug on my posts and on my account. I have no ability to post on New-Ager and New World Order Supporter as well the grandson of David Rockefeller, Mark Zuckerberg’s site.

The article on mind control was very well researched and included documentation from reputable scientific research sites such as MIT which included how changing the frequency modulation of an electronic signal can alter one’s mood state and “fake” voices can even be implanted inside someone’s head and make them believe it is real. I linked this research to the mall event in Kentucky and Facebook yanked the post almost immediately. I was aware that Facebook was pulling posts for any expression of opposition to Muslim immigration into the United States without proper screening under the United Nation’s Refugee/ Resettlement Program. This censorship and banning of my post by Facebook really caught me off guard.

From the following paragraphs, the readers will see why 2016 will witnessing the ushering in of multiple false flag events using psychotronic weaponry similar to the article that I recently wrote on mind control. The strategy is simple; Agitate people to the point of violence and this will provide the excuse to subjugate the American people, with the military. In the eyes of many sheep, this action would be completely justified in the eyes of many Americans who are willing to sacrifice liberty for security.

Why the Post on Mind Control Was Banned By Facebook

The Internet is abuzz with a nationally run commercial which shows the Army dressed up in riot gear. EVERY AMERICAN should be asking the following question: Why is the following  U.S. Army commercial running nationally which clearly shows the U.S. Army performing riot control and crowd control tactics?

This could only be a domestic operation as the U.S. Army does not have an international mandate to carry out such activities in foreign countries. The U.S. may train foreign military and policies entities, however, they do not execute the activity on their own volition.

The United States has witnessed the militarizing of the police. We saw local police dressed up in riot control clothing in places like Ferguson and Baltimore. Thus And if the U.S. army is performing domestic crowd control then is this not martial law?

So it is in Baltimore and Ferguson, it is also the same in the latest U.S. Army recruitment commercial

In a 30 second commercial where the U.S. Army could be portrayed in a thousand different roles, why are they focusing on an image that could represent martial law? Another creepy harbinger in very strange times.

Shocking: Martial Law Preparations Confirmed

These two launched the political career of President Obama. Ayers bragged he would have to kill millions in re-education camps.

I have covered, on multiple occasions, the intent to stage false flag terror attacks using embedded ISIS cells into the country as a pretext to implement martial law and to seize our guns and subsequently remove any hope of self-defense. 

Along these lines,  I have covered everything from the Civilian Inmate Labor Brigade, PDD 51, REX 84, the Army Manual on Resettlement, the Larry Grathwohl warning about how the Weathermen Underground hatched these plots which would culminate in the deaths of 50 million Americans, etc. By the way, the Weathermen, leaders of Bill Ayers and Bernadine Dorne launched President Obama’s political career from their Chicago area home.

Below, Alex Jones does a masterful job of summing up many of these in which Alex Jones ties together the elements of one of the most diabolical plans facing America today. In the following video, Alex Jones details this administration’s insidious plan to put it’s own citizens under martial law in order to strip them of all rights. The 'government' is even issuing subliminal propaganda via the Ad Council who claims it does not know how a news cast mentioning martial law in the midst of an outbreak ended up in an AARP ad.

If this did’t wake up the nation, then nothing will.

What the above video did not include was the purpose and impact of Jade Helm. Under Jade Helm 15, the current administration was able to practice dissident extraction and martial law techniques of various types in conjunction with their foreign operative allies.  

Who will ever forget these images arising from the pre-Jade Helm 15 launch as would-be actor dissidents were extracted in Ft. Lauderdale.

Ft. Lauderdale dissident extraction drill executed on March 27, 2015. These images should haunt all Americans.

The martial law enforcers, through Jade Helm 15, have prepositioned their assets to be brought to bear in a moments notice. And don’t forget - Jade Helm 15 troops had company, lots of company from the United Nations during the Jade Helm troop and equipment redistribution.
(Many couldn't speak English properly if at all; same as with Bundy Ranch and current Hammond Ranch confrontations.) 

And what about the economy? It is only a matter of time with a $19 trillion dollar deficit and a $1.5 quadrillion credit swap derivatives debt.

Happy New Year?

Erdogan Will Mimmic Hitler’s Nazi Germany

Unbelievable: Erdogan Just Said That His Caliphate Will Mimmic Hitler’s Nazi Germany

 

Walid Shoebat 

January 1, 2016

I told you that 2016 is going to be a very interesting year. 

Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdoğan, who is a strong advocate of a switch to presidential system in his country, has just said that the implementation of a presidential system while keeping the unitary structure of Turkey is possible: “When you look at Hitler’s Germany and other countries” as an example, says Erdogan at a press conference.

So this is how Turkey will keep unity in its government under his new presidential (he means Caliphate) rule.

Lets read this again:

“When we look [at other countries], we see that it is possible. You would see this when you look at Hitler’s Germany and other countries,” he was quoted as saying by T24 news portal.

 

Erdoğan is the staunchest supporter of the formation of a “Turkish-style” presidential system that he claims will help the country’s development by eliminating “double-headedness” in state governance and thus pave the way for a more effective decision-making system.

Lets not forget that back in April, Erdoğan argued that Turkey’s government had been already changed into a de facto presidential system, calling for a constitutional framework to “finalize” this transition.

Critics say more executive powers in the hands of Erdoğan will likely intensify Turkey’s drift toward one-man rule and Erdogan says its Hitler’s way.

Some even expressed such fear that he would resemble Adolf Hitler, who was also elected by popular vote but then turned Germany into a fascist dictatorship.

Turkey has enjoyed nearly 140 years of constitutional experience since the inception of the Ottoman Constitution of 1876, known in Turkish as the Kanûn-u Esâsî, and the parliamentary system has been the defining characteristic of all constitutions to follow.

Everything is adding up as we have been telling you. 

What would it take for people to believe us?

Erdogan comparing the news presidential system to Hitler’s is no joke. Erdogan’s classmate says that Erdogan used to “walk around with a copy of Adolf Hitler’s ‘Mein Kampf'”. 

Erdogan’s March 16th publication titled Ust Akil (The Mastermind), where one enters an extremely dark side of Erdogan’s thinking process on how he views the Jews. 

The term Ust Akil (The Mastermind) was introduced by Erdogan himself, a sensational two hour “documentary”, produced by A Haber, Erdogan’s main TV propaganda machine, billed as an expose of the great international conspiracy targeting Erdogan’s “New Turkey.”

Turkey’s President Recep Tayyip Erdogan is seen in this 

still from “The Mastermind.” (photo by YouTube)

The documentary, which supposed to be an anti-conspiracy theory promotion turns out to be nothing more than a conspiracy theory in itself, a sequel to The Protocols of the Elders of Zion, the early 20th century anti-Semitic hoax claiming to describe a Jewish plot for global domination. 

In The Mastermind, it opens up with the scenes of a rebuilt Temple in Jerusalem and the Dome of the Rock.

Erdogan’s production is a mystery about who controls the world and the conclusion is simple: The Mastermind is none other than The Jew.

So perhaps, what is no conspiracy theory, is that Erdogan is the best candidate to match Adolf Hitler’s anti-Semitism. This time, this Hitler will take with him an entire Muslim World. After all, the Jew is the mind, the documentary tell us, that “rules the world, burns, destroys, starves, wages wars, organizes revolutions and coups, and establishes states within states.” 

Is this any different from what Hitler sold to the masses?

Entering the dark haul, the Hitler of the Muslim world and listening to him mesmerize the crowd as Hitler did is quite the wakeup call. This is not a Hitler who is calling for an Arian race, but an entire globe under the rule of Allah and his messenger, to rule Spain and crush the Trinity:

Erdogan says in this video: “Praise be to Allah the lord of the two worlds [this world and the underworld] where ownership belongs to Allah alone, victory is to Allah alone. He has no associates [denouncing the trinity]. In the pathway we came out asking Allah to strengthen our feet on the straight path …We have dressed up in our shrouds and are prepared to confront as did Sultan Alparslan. We have believed as Sultan Saladin that victory is not from the sword but comes from Allah. We have went to the path after we have burned the ships of return behind us as did the conquerer of Spain Tareq Benziad.”

Erdogan wants Italy and Spain. He wants to be Tariq Bin Ziad, the conqueror of Spain. He wants to be the tyrant Alp Arslan and Saladin. These are the Muslim leaders who fought against Christendom and he wants to be Saladin who conquered Jerusalem. He wants to be all in all. He wants to declare war on the strongest fortresses to advance his foreign God, Allah, through warfare.

Soldiers of Christ

Get ready

The time is near

Until World War III

Happy New Year 

http://shoebat.com/2016/01/01/90248/?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+shoebat+%28Walid+Shoebat%29 

ISIS Plans To Slaughter Thousands Worldwide in 2016

ISIS  Plans  To  Slaughter  Thousands  Of  People  In  Public  Places  Worldwide  In  2016  For  the  “Final  Battle”  Against  the  West

Andrew Bieszad  

December 31, 2015

ISIS is planning to massacre thousands of civilians in public places around the world in 2016 as it desperately seeks to draw the west into a titanic “final battle”.

The sick terror group will activate hundreds of sleeper cells in “dozens of countries” in an unprecedented bid to destabilise western governments and spark a huge military retaliation in the Middle East.

The shock claim, from one of the world’s leading authorities on the death cult, comes amid fears of a New Year’s Eve terror plot in London and other major world cities.

And next year will see a huge increase in both the number and scale of major terror attacks, according to Dr Theodore Karasik, a Gulf-based analyst of regional geo-political affairs who has extensively studied ISIS’s behaviour.

He warned: “ISIS’s media operation is taunting its enemy to come to fight their Final Battle.

“But first, it wants to show its global reach with zeal…from cells, to lone wolves, to bedroom jihadists – to target landmarks and crowds in dozens of countries across the world.” 

http://shoebat.com/2015/12/31/isis-plans-to-slaughter-thousands-of-people-in-public-places-worldwide-in-2016-for-the-final-battle-against-the-west/

DHS sneaking terrorists on UPS planes into the US

111,600  MUSLIMS  ESCORTED  INTO  U.S.  THROUGH  MEXICO  TO  OKLAHOMA  AND  KANSAS

DHS (Department of Homeland Suicide) is Sneaking in Terrorists on UPS planes into the US

Is history repeating itself? 

Is Obama circumventing the law once again to bring in refugees, just like he did with the “refugees” from South America who were actually given rides on D.H.S. buses for protection??? 

Without knowing precisely what is going on, there is no doubt something nefarious is afoot. There is no reason for 30 buses of people to be flying on a UPS flight designated for parcels, under the cover of night, filled with people who are met on arrival with buses already waiting and whisked away in secret. 

In the video, the person recording is in hot pursuit of up to 30 buses that he claims are filled with people he just watched land in Harrisburg International Airport on a UPS plane.

Upon the plane’s arrival, which was alleged to be a “parcel flight,” there were 30 buses already lined up, and ready to receive what turned out not to be parcels, but dozens and dozens of people.

According to whoever took the video, he watched as the planes occupants were quickly escorted onto the buses that were already waiting, and then he began filming as the buses departed with all the “mystery flyers.” 

 

Saturday, October 3rd, buses upon buses packed FULL of Syrian refugees being brought into the U.S through Mexico and then processed and given ID’s, money and Wal Mart gift cards and then taken to Loves for prayer rugs and kornas and then distributed throughout the U.S. right under our noses with charter buses that are booked throughout the month of October…all 230 of them!!!! Get this out!!! 

http://investmentwatchblog.com/111600-muslims-escorted-into-u-s-through-mexico-to-oklahoma-and-kansas/

Just another example of the lawlessness pervading Washington, DC and the Bar Associations

Questions for Judge Anna about the US Postmaster General

31 Dec 2015 05:56 PM PST

According to the Civil Order paper issued by Anna, a new postmaster general office was opened in the US and that, due to corruption, the old postmaster general office was vacated. Do you know what 'vacated' means? 

What is the postmaster general office advertised here: https://about.usps.com/who-we-are/leadership/officers/pmg-ceo.htm ?

How is it that this office is still operating if it has been vacated ?

Where do we find the source on which to verify the process for becoming a continental USA judge?  

There has to be a way to show this information to people for educational purpose? 

Thank you in advance.

*******************************************************************

Judge Anna Answers:

There are -- at my last count which was several years ago--- no less than seven differently named offices supposedly filled by one man which are all variations of similar words:  United States Postmaster General,  Post Master of the United States, US POSTMASTER,  USA POST MASTER, POST MASTER for the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,  Post Master for the United States, and so on. 

These are all basically fraudulent titles employing semantic deceit, referring to private corporate offices in various governmental services corporations.  The office of anything calling itself a "General" anything is Post-Civil War by definition and bears no relationship to the office which the Global Estate Trust and the King of Spain established in (I believe it was) 1754 for the First Trustee of the Land, Benjamin Franklin.

It is his office that is so highly coveted and which has been so grossly abused and corrupted as to require the appointment of new Regional Post Master to impose structure and discipline on those who have claimed to occupy it and similarly corrupted offices in Canada and Mexico. 

In the 1920's the corporate look-alike-sound-alike office was made subservient to the Secretary of the United States Treasury and Franklin's actual office remained vacant for many years while pretenders occupied the other similar sounding offices of "Postmaster"---giving the appearance but not the substance of a Trustee acting in behalf of the Land Jurisdiction owed the States of America.

This was part of the central Breach of Trust that Pope Benedict XVI and his predecessors back to 1845 were accused of in 2008, and yet another example of corporate interloping allowed by the British Monarch who is under the Federal System and supposed to be acting as our Trustee in the jurisdiction of international commerce where all this semantic deceit, duplicity, bad faith and fraud has occurred. 

King Juan Carlos threw another wrench into correct by abdicating the Spanish Throne.  Without a Spanish King to operate the national land jurisdiction, the basic responsibility for administration gets thrown back on the Pope, but he is already occupying the position of Trustee of the Air Jurisdiction worldwide so can't act in two lateral trust offices at once, which is like being in two places at one time. He acted in his 'Supreme Pontiff' office instead to create a new regional office and placed it over and in control of the national level offices that have been mis-administered.

It was the hope that this would re-direct the functioning of these national level offices.  Instead, the rats found a technicality and arrested the Pope's new Regional Post Master.  

This is standard operating procedure for the runaway government corporation doing business as the District of Columbia Municipal Corporation and is just another example of the lawlessness pervading Washington, DC and the Bar Associations.

See this article and over 100 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

 

HAPPY NEW YEAR FROM YOUR FRIENDS AT NESARA.......................

IT'S THAT TIME OF YEAR AGAIN!  SENDING YOU OUR BEST WISHES 

CLICK HERE:    You can view your card here.

Supreme  Court  set  to  decide  politically  charged  cases  in  2016

January 1, 2016 

December 29, 2015 

Tribune News Service

 

 

WASHINGTON (TNS) — As the nation heads into a presidential election year, the Supreme Court is set to decide a half-dozen politically charged cases in 2016 on such topics as abortion, affirmative action, contraceptives and immigration.

In several cases, conservatives are hoping the high court will shift current law to the right or block President Barack Obama’s policies, while liberals are defending the status quo.

But with justices closely split along ideological lines, the cases are likely to yield a series of 5-4 decisions and make clear the next president’s appointees could tip the law sharply to the right or left.

Here are the major cases due for decision by June 2016.

The court will decide whether Texas can enforce two regulations that would force about three-fourths of the state’s abortion clinics to shut down.

One measure requires clinics to use only doctors with admitting privileges at a nearby hospital. A second requires abortion facilities to match the standards of an outpatient surgical center.

The first question before the court is whether these regulations will protect the health of women, as state lawmakers assert, or hinder reproductive care “by drastically reducing access to safe and legal abortion” in large parts of Texas, as abortion-rights advocates contend.

In the background is a larger question about the nature of abortion rights set out in the Roe vs. Wade decision: Is it a constitutional right that trumps state regulations that may interfere with a woman’s choice, or is it a limited right subject to restriction? The case of Whole Woman’s Health vs. Cole will be argued March 2.

The court’s conservatives believe the Constitution and the civil rights laws forbid schools and colleges from admitting students based on their race, and they would like to strike down affirmative action policies that favor some applicants over others based on their race or ethnicity.

Justice Anthony M. Kennedy, seen as the swing vote, has agreed with conservatives in the past and condemned admissions policies that set “numerical goals indistinguishable from quotas.” But he has also refused to shut down all affirmative action.

In December, the court heard Fisher vs. University of Texas for a second time to decide whether the school’s admission policy is constitutional.

The court could deal a severe blow to the union movement in a case from California. The justices will hear a free-speech challenge to pro-union laws in more than 20 states that require all public employees pay a “fair share fee” to their union, even if they are opposed to the union and refuse to join.

Rebecca Friedrichs, an Orange County teacher, sued the California Teachers Association, alleging the forced fees violate her rights under the 1st Amendment. Friedrichs vs. CTA will be argued Jan. 11.

The court will decide its fourth case on Obama’s healthcare law and the second involving a religious-freedom challenge to a regulation that requires employers to include no-cost coverage for contraceptives in their health insurance policies.

Churches are exempt from this requirement. Under a separate accommodation, religious nonprofits, such as Catholic charities or the University of Notre Dame, need not provide nor pay for the coverage, but they must notify the government of their religious objection.

In a series of lawsuits, Catholic bishops and Protestant colleges contend the accommodation did not go far enough. The Catholic leaders said they would be “complicit in sin” if they made the required notification because doing so would “trigger” a process for providing the disputed contraceptives.

Obama’s lawyers say the mere signing of a notification does not “substantially burden a person’s exercise of religion,” quoting the 1993 federal law on religious liberty. Nearly all of the U.S. appeals courts rejected the challenges, but the high court agreed to hear seven appeals from religious entities. They were consolidated into a single case, Zubik vs. Burwell, due to be heard in late March.

The fate of Obama’s broadest effort to shield immigrants from deportation rests with the justices. His lawyers are appealing rulings by a judge in Texas and the 5th Circuit Court in New Orleans, which blocked Obama’s latest immigration action from taking effect.

It would have shielded as many as 5 million immigrants who have lived in the country illegally for at least five years and have a child who is a citizen or legal resident. Those who come forward and qualify would be offered work permits.

If the justices agree in the next few weeks to hear the case of United States vs. Texas, it will be a major test of the president’s power to change immigration policy without seeking approval from Congress. 

But if the justices turn down the appeal, Obama’s action will likely remain on hold until he leaves office.

–David G. Savage
Tribune Washington Bureau

http://personalliberty.com/supreme-court-set-to-decide-politically-charged-cases-in-2016/     
 

Another day, another assault on liberty

ANOTHER DAY AND ANOTHER ASSAULT 

ON LIBERTY IN AMERICA

January 1, 2016 
December 30, 2015
Bob Livingston 

The gun grabber faction of Congress has embarked on yet another assault on liberty and the 2^nd Amendment, filing a bill called the “Assault Weapons Ban of 2015” (H.R. 4269) in the House. It was initiated by Rep. David Cicilline (Communist-R.I.) with some 126 listed co-conspirators, all communists listed as Democrats.

The bill does not even hide the fact that it is a direct assault on the 2^nd Amendment. The first line of the bill reads, “To regulate assault weapons, to ensure the right to keep and bear arms is not unlimited, and other purposes (emphasis added).” The “other purposes” are to begin an overt assault on lawful gun owners as a first step to remove from them their right to possess any and all weapons for self-defense and sporting purposes.

The bill lists more than 160 rifles, shotguns and pistols that are banned under the bill. The common denominator in them is that the guns look scary to some people, are semi-automatic, may have features that make them easier to handle and have the ability to accept what the cabal has decided are “large capacity magazines,” which equates to anything more than 10. The banned weapons are less powerful than many weapons listed specifically in the bill as not banned.

The term “assault weapon” is a nebulous and meaningless term in reality. It’s a code word applied to a class of weapons that simply look and function a certain way. They are not used to “assault” people any more than other weapons and are, in fact, used to commit murder less often than less expensive weapons and even hands and feet, knives and blunt objects.

According to the FBI, rifles of all types were used to commit only 285 murders in 2013 (down from 351 in 2009), and so-called “assault weapons” are just a small subset of rifles generally.

The previous assault weapons ban, which expired in 2004, had no effect on crime. From the 1997 study on the assault weapons ban by the National Institute of Justice:

Using a variety of national and local data sources, we found no statistical evidence of post-ban decreases in either the number of victims per gun homicide incident, the number of gunshot wounds per victim, or the proportion of gunshot victims with multiple wounds. Nor did we find assault weapons to be overrepresented in a sample of mass murders involving guns.

In 2004, the NIJ revisited the gun ban. It concluded:

Should it be renewed, the ban’s effects on gun violence are likely to be small at best and perhaps too small for reliable measurement. AWs were rarely used in gun crimes even before the ban. ^[i]

Under normal circumstances one could assume that a Republican-controlled House and Senate would relegate a gun ban bill of any type to file 13, where it belongs –especially one as overreaching as this.

But given Speaker Paul Ryan’s (Fascist-Wis.) and Majority Leader Mitch McConnell’s (Fascist-Ky.) penchant for supporting Obama’s liberty-stealing, big-government, progressive legislation, nothing can be ruled out until the bill is dead, dead, dead. 

Meanwhile, the undocumented usurper currently despoiling the People’s House has promised to embark on another gun grab of his own, attempting to write new 2^nd Amendment-infringing legislation with his executive pen in what would be yet another unconstitutional power grab.

But if the confiscators are somehow able to get a new weapons ban passed, a revolution is likely to ensue, and it would not be bloodless. Rest assured that being a confiscator would be an especially dangerous and short-lived occupation.

Americans are buying weapons and ammunition in record numbers (Obama will go down as the greatest weapons salesman of all time — both to Americans and Islamists). And polls show 54 percent of Americans oppose a ban, especially while the regime is arming ISIS terrorists and inviting them into America through the front door it has propped open.

And here are a few numbers for you to chew on. There were 8,454 people killed with firearms in 2013 (the last year for which figures are available). Assuming one murderer per murder committed, this legislation is designed to apply to 0.0026 percent of the population (or 8,454 people out of a country of 321.7 million). 

Breaking that down even further, assuming one murderer for each murder committed with a rifle, and that only rifles falling under the proposed gun ban were used in those murders, the legislation is designed to apply to only 0.00008 percent of the population. Or in other words, more than 321,738,000 Americans did not commit murder with a weapon on the ban list, had no intention of doing so and never will.

The regime’s intent is total disarmament of the citizens. A disarmed citizenry is a dependent one. A dependent citizenry is a frightened one. A frightened citizenry is easier to control. (AND to MURDER in record numbers as in Nazi Germany, in Russia, and in China during their mass genocide experiences.)

[i] “Control: Exposing the Truth About Guns,” by Glenn Beck, page 44.

This entry was posted in Freedom Watch and tagged 2nd Amendment. Bookmark the permalink. 

 

http://personalliberty.com/another-day-another-assault-on-liberty/ 

 

 

OBAMA  SET  TO  UNVEIL  CURBS  ON  GUN  SELLERS

Executive actions expected next week will be part of the criminal cabal corporation's president's new year push to make 'progress' on long-stalled problems before the 2016 presidential election heats up.

The proposal wouldn’t close the so-called gun show loophole, though it has the potential to narrow it. | Getty

White House

By Sarah Wheaton and Edward-Isaac Dovere

12/31/15 05:59 AM EST

Obama’s bid to assert himself in his final year will begin with long-awaited executive actions on gun control, expected to be released next week, shortly after he returns to Washington.   (What happened to the restored Republic that was said to be effective as of January 1, 2015, with General J Dunford as the interim president until such time as Americans have an election to fill the offices of the restored Republic??  This nation is STILL under the control of the Nazi mafia??)

The White House is putting finishing touches on several measures in an effort to make progress on curbing gun violence, an issue the president and close aides have found frustratingly intractable, before the race to replace him enters prime time.

According to gun industry insiders and others familiar with the proposals, the changes include requiring an expanded number of small-scale gun sellers to be licensed — and therefore conduct background checks — whenever selling a weapon. This wouldn’t close the so-called gun show loophole, though it has the potential to narrow it.

The administration is also expected to impose tighter rules for reporting guns that get lost or stolen on their way to a buyer.

Neither comes close to the stronger gun control measures Obama sought in the wake of the 2012 mass shooting of schoolchildren in Sandy Hook and that he has said he still wants. But with Congress unlikely to approve any new gun curbs before the 2016 election, the measures are in line with what gun-control advocates were hoping would be adopted before Obama leaves office.

As with every aspect of the president’s final year, the decisions about the gun actions are being made with a sense of limited time and the 2016 political calendar. 

Obama will be returning from his Hawaii vacation, eager to make a splash; an earlier-than-normal State of the Union address on Jan. 12 is central to that strategy. But with the Iowa caucuses taking place on Feb. 1, Obama will have only a small window to act before the primary melee begins to crowd out other political news.

The background check change has been anticipated for months. Obama will tighten the definition of what it means to be “engaged in the business” of firearms sales. 
Currently, the law says people who sell guns with the “principal objective of livelihood and profit” have to get a dealer’s license through the Bureau of Alcohol, Tobacco, Firearms and Explosives — and therefore conduct a background check on buyers no matter where they sell, including online or at a gun show. 

It’s unclear whether a lot more dealers would line up for licenses. But gun-control advocates say a better definition would make it much easier to prosecute sellers who should, but don’t. Only about half of the people who are tried for selling guns without a license are convicted by juries, according to a report from Everytown, the pro-gun control group led by former New York Mayor Michael Bloomberg.

In an interview, Everytown officials couldn’t confirm whether the White House was heeding their advice. But, said legal director Liz Avore, “Any kind of clarification would be beneficial in this context because right now most sellers and prosecutors are kind of flying blind.”

It's not clear whether Obama has settled on final language yet. But as one of the major proponents of a change, Everytown has recommended adding several factors to the definition — including selling guns in their original packaging, reselling a gun shortly after acquiring it, maintaining a certain quantity of guns for sale or selling more than 25 guns a year — as possible signals that someone needs a license.

A top gun industry executive defended the current definition, saying it requires dealers to make most of their living from gun sales before requiring a license. 
Based on conversations with ATF officials this month, the executive described the upcoming change as "overreach": “If you are not doing it for the principal purpose of earning a livelihood AND earn a profit, you are not engaged in the business as defined by Congress,” he said in an email. 

Another victory for advocates is likely to be a requirement for all licensed dealers and manufacturers to report to federal authorities any guns that are stolen in transit to a buyer as missing from their inventory. 

Currently, advocates say, thieves often target packages addressed to gun retailers in the hopes of stealing unregistered guns that are harder to trace. And while buyer and seller might sort out refunds or replacements on their own, they’re not required to report the missing guns to the National Crime Information Center. 

ATF first proposed the new regulation in August 2014, which industry opposed, saying a voluntary reporting program was working just fine. But the year-and-a-half lag between the rule’s proposal and finalization is another factor urging Obama to act forcefully as he enters the last year in his term.

It is not clear whether the measure will take the form of a new regulation (which would take months longer to finish because of requirements for public comment) or clarification of an existing rule, which would take less time but might not carry as much weight with the courts — or a future administration.

“We have not been told that they are drafting a proposed rule,” the industry executive said. “But it remains to be seen.”

The White House declined to comment on the substance of the executive actions or their timing. Communications Director Jen Psaki told reporters at an event hosted by Bloomberg News in mid-December that the new gun measures were coming in “weeks, not months.” 

This latest round of executive moves follows 23 actions related to gun violence that Obama ordered in 2013, in the months following the Sandy Hook massacre, plus two more in 2014. During that same period, Vice President Joe Biden led a failed campaign with congressional Democrats to pass a bill to impose near-universal background checks. 

The president’s announcement of new gun actions will be more like his immigration executive orders in late 2014 — currently held up by the courts — issued as part of a broader campaign to pressure Congress and draw a contrast with Republicans.

White House senior adviser Valerie Jarrett also raised gun-control advocates’ hopes for new domestic violence provisions last month. In a post on the actress Lena Dunham’s website, Jarrett noted that guns are the most likely cause of death for women who are victims of domestic partner violence.

Gun-control activists acknowledged that changing the rules for licenses might have limited impact on what sellers actually do in the short term. But in this political environment, they’ll take whatever measures they can, no matter how incremental.

“Setting cultural norms," said Everytown research director Ted Alcorn, "is something that laws do."

http://www.politico.com/story/2015/12/obama-guns-gun-control-217234

State Dept. breaks judge’s deadline on Clinton emails

STATE DEPARTMENT BREAKS JUDGE'S DEADLINE ON THE HILLARY CLINTON EMAILS SCANDLE

Secretary of State Hillary Rodham Clinton checks her phone after attending a U.S.-Russia meeting in Hanoi, Vietnam on July 23, 2010. The revelation that Mrs. Clinton used an off-the-books email account during her time as secretary of state has raised ... more >

 
Stephen Dinan
The Washington Times
Thursday, December 31, 2015


The State Department broke a judge’s order on the number of former Secretary Hillary Rodham Clinton’s emails it was supposed to release Thursday, blaming the holiday season for throwing it off track.

The department promised another release of emails next week to make up for its breach, and said even the emails it was releasing Thursday will not be fully processed and won’t be able to be sorted by senders or recipients in the department’s computer system.

“We have worked diligently to come as close to the goal as possible but with the large number of documents involved and the holiday schedule we have not met the goal this month. To narrow that gap the State Department will make another production of former Secretary Clinton’s email sometime next week,” the department said in a statement.

It’s the latest embarrassment for the department, which has repeatedly struggled to handle the more than 30,000 emails Mrs. Clinton returned to the government nearly two years after she left office.

The department is under a federal court order to release emails every month since the summer, but broke the order by missing the first deadline under that order. It had caught up, but has now fallen behind again.

All told, some 5,500 pages of documents will be released later Thursday. It’s not clear yet how many actual individual emails that works out to, since many of them span multiple pages.

Under the court order, the government is supposed to release 4,800 full emails this month. The final 5,400 emails are to be released near the end of next month — just days before Iowa voters hold the caucuses that kick off the primary season, deciding whether Mrs. Clinton will be Democrats’ presidential nominee.

She belatedly returned her emails after the Obama administration, prodded by Congress’s probe into the 2012 Benghazi terrorist attack, realized (??) she had taken all of her messages with her when she left office. 

The administration then publicly revealed that Mrs. Clinton had refused to use a regular account on the State.gov email server, instead creating an account on a server she kept at her home in New York.

Hundreds of the messages she returned contain information that has now been deemed classified — though Mrs. Clinton insists it was not secret at the time she sent it. She says she didn’t break any laws in keeping her own account. 

http://www.washingtontimes.com/news/2015/dec/31/state-dept-breaks-judges-deadline-clinton-emails/

Turkey Begins Mass Genocide Of Kurds

OBAMA LOOKS ON IN SILENCE AS TURKEY BEGINS MASS GENOCIDE      OF KURDS

EVERYTHING HE IS ASSOCIATED WITH IS COMPOSED OF LIES UPON LIES, DEATH AND DESTRUCTION TO HUMANITY
 

An appalling new Ministry of Defense (MoD) report circulating in the Kremlin today is warning that the Obama regime backed Republic of Turkey is nearing an outbreak of total civil war after it has begun what can only be described as a mass genocide of its Kurdish population similar to the 1937-1938 Dersim Massacre that killed up to 80,000 of these peoples—and that was so “admired” by Nazi German leader Adolf Hitler.  

He not only ordered his fascist government to sign a non-aggression pact with Turkey, he also used this massacre as his favorite “model” to solve what he called Germany’s “Jewish question”.

While Hitler in his “Jewish question”, this report explains, characterized the effect of a Jewish presence in Germany as a “race-tuberculosis of the peoples”, the Turkish government, likewise, was at the same time laughingly stating “Armenians for lunch, Kurds for supper”—a reference not only to the Dersim Massacre, but to the Armenian Genocide of 1915 which killed 1.5 million, as both of these races of human beings were considered by Turkey, like Nazi Germany did the Jews, as “vermin”. 

With Turkey’s Kurdish population being the largest ethnic minority in that country, numbering between 14-22.5 million [Note: Turkey forbids an exact census of these people.], this report continues, Turkey considers them a threat—even to Turkish President Recep Tayyip Erdogan vowing recently that he will not allow this Kurdish “threat” to exist either inside or outside his country and stating about them: “You will be annihilated in those houses, those buildings, those ditches which you have dug.”

Backing up this vow, this report notes, Erdogan has not only begun a bombing campaign against the US-backed Kurdish peoples in Syria and Iraq heroically fighting and dying against Islamic State (ISIS/ISIL/Daesh) terrorist barbarians, he has begun ruthlessly exterminating the Kurdish peoples in his own nation, too. 

Two of the worst Kurdish cities in Turkey under genocidal seize by Erdogan’s forces, this report grimly states, are Cizre and Silopi whose nearly 200,000 inhabitants are nearing death due to the 3 month long cutoff of all electricity, phone service, food and water while at the same under constant bombardment—a grave situation that has led to Cemil Bayik, co-chair of the Union of Kurdish Communities' (KCK) executive council, to warn: “We are heading to the establishment of a revolutionary resistance front with the participation of organizations that will come from inside and outside of Turkey.”

With the KCK and other Kurdish groups, including the much feared Kurdistan Workers’ Party (PKK) within Turkey having ended their cease-fire with Erdogan’s forces once this genocidal action against them began, this report further notes, many experts are now expecting Turkey to be fully engulfed in civil war soon—including noted Turkish journalist and former military officer Metin Gurcan who has warned: “The PKK (and its allies) have only one ace to play to break the siege: It must transfer the clashes to western Turkey to ease the pressure it's under in the southeast.”

Not just from journalist Gurcan are warnings’ coming either, this report continues, but from the Turkish government itself, too, which is likewise stating that “were one step away from civil war”. 

And as Turkey has now blocked their border with Iraq stranding up to 10,000 Kurdish peoples from returning to their besieged homes and families [Note: thousands of Turkish Kurds work in Iraqi Kurdistan oil fields], MoD experts in this report warn Iraq’s new threat of war against Turkey, unless it removes its troops that illegally invaded, is bringing this already dire and grave situation to the boiling point—especially with this coming after the bombshell revelations last week of the Obama regimes support of the Islamic State and Turkey’s arrest of two of its top generals who stopped a CIA weapons shipment to Islamic State terrorists from crossing into Syria from Turkey.  

In confronting the Turkish governments genocide of the Kurdish peoples that will soon engulf that entire NATO nation in civil war, this report concludes, the Islamic State supporting Obama regime still insists that Turkey is their “strong ally”—but to which President Putin, who has long tired of the lies from both Obama and Erdogan, has no illusions about and has thrown Russia’s considerable weight onto the side of these starving and oppressed peoples—after all, with Obama having broken his promise for 7 straight years to officially recognize the American Genocide committed by Turkey, how much defense will he exert to keep the same thing from happening now to the Kurds? 

Sorcha Faal
Jan 1 2016 
 
http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index1973.htm 

How much time do Americans have left before nations of the world fully invade and assault the people of these united States in retaliation for the crimes against humanity being committed worldwide in the name of the Americans by the traitorous scumbag criminals in Wash DC?  Countdown has already begun.