Lynch signaling no charges for Hillary

JUDGE  JEANINE:  LYNCH  SIGNALING  NO  CHARGES  FOR  HILLARY  

'All  the  crumbs  are  leading  to  the  fact  that  [she]  will  not  be  indicted'

WND EXCLUSIVE

Bob Unruh
July 1 2016  

 
Judge Jeanine Pirro, the longtime prosecutor and judge who now is a host for Fox News, on Friday said Attorney General Loretta Lynch’s comments on her private meeting with former President Bill Clinton indicate Hillary Clinton will not be charged over her private email server. 

WND reported on the meeting Monday in Phoenix between Bill Clinton and Lynch. The AG said they talked about golf and grandchildren but not the criminal investigation of Hillary Clinton. 

The revelations about the meeting triggered a groundswell of demands that Lynch recuse herself from any decision in the case. And now Lynch has released a statement that she will “accept” the recommendations from the career lawyers and prosecutors in the Department of Justice on the case against Hillary Clinton. 

Pirro, however, said Lynch really is not doing anything significant. “No, she’s not stepping aside from it,” Pirro said.  “She says she is accepting the determinations and findings of career prosecutors and lawyers as well as FBI investigators and Director Comey,” she said. “That means she is accepting their determination. “She is not deferring the decision to them. She is not recusing herself – which is something she should have done – under the ethics code.”

Pirro pointed out that Lynch is the only one who can give prosecutors “access” to a grand jury.

However, Pirro said, Lynch works for Obama, and Obama previously has stated there was no problem with Clinton’s email system.

“All the crumbs are leading to the fact that Hillary Clinton will not be indicted,” she said.

“This happens all the time … prosecutors say to cops. 
… You know it looks like you got a prima facie case, but I can’t prove it beyond a reasonable doubt,” she said.
The result? No case, even though the evidence was “accepted.”

Pirro said Lynch earlier sent powerful messages to Obama about the case, suggesting Obama could end up being the first witness if ever there was a criminal trial.

“Hillary emailed President Barack Obama. He knew she had a private email server. He is complicit. They will not allow a constitutional crisis where the president of the U.S. knew about the risking of security,” Pirro said.

Pirro said Lynch “threw a shot across the bow couple weeks … when she said everyone in Washington knew about [the] email situation.”

“Translation, Mr. President, this ain’t happening because you’re my first witness.”

Lynch reported the meeting “was a great deal about grandchildren, it was primarily social about our travels and he mentioned golf he played in Phoenix.”

In a question-and-answer session at a Colorado event on Friday, Lynch repeatedly said she will “accept” the recommendations from investigators working on the case against Hillary.

But she also revealed that there are levels of “supervisors” who will review the recommendations, as will the director of the FBI.

She repeated that her conversation with Bill Clinton was social.

“It really was in that regard,” she said.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/07/judge-pirro-lynch-reveals-no-charges-for-hillary-on-email/#!

'Elites' Called to "Rise-up against the Ignorant Masses"

'Elites' Called to "Rise-up against the Ignorant Masses" - The Masses Reply: "Bring it on" - see what happens to you! 

Thursday, 30 June 2016 12:42 
Radio Host Hal Turner HalTurnerShow.com 

And so it’s on…

James Traub, at Foreign Policy.com, has called for the “elites to rise up against the ignorant masses.”  In a spectacular display of the very ignorance against which he issues his call to arms, Traub shows how thoroughly infected the establishment is with their group-think.  God forbid the ‘fist shaking’ rabble would actually think for themselves and effect an “utter repudiation of the bankers and economists and Western heads of state who warned voters against the dangers of a split with the European Union.”  If there was a miscalculation on the part of David Cameron, it was “how utterly he misjudged his own people[‘s ability to think for themselves].”

Rise up against the ignorant masses? Be careful what you wish for, Mr. Traub… Your intellectual nakedness just might end up on full, public display.

The Foundational Issue: The Most Significant Unit of Society

Traub shows himself ignorant of both British and American history when he concludes: “[M]aybe we have become so inclined to celebrate the authenticity of all personal conviction that it is now elitist to believe in reason, expertise, and the lessons of history.”

Philosophically, ‘Scottish Common Sense Realism’ provides a framework for understanding how someone’s thinking would begin with ‘personal conviction’.  This framework lies at the heart of the thinking of authors like John Locke, on whom Thomas Jefferson depended heavily when writing the Declaration of Independence.

Locke’s philosophy of government and economics expresses this framework and stands in stark contrast to that of Thomas Hobbes. Between the two of them we can drive the difference down to a single question: What is the most significant unit of society?  The answer for those who would follow Hobbes is the State.  For those who would follow Locke it would be the individual.

Money and Monetary Policy: The Scaffolding of Society

At the heart of debates over economics, then, lies the matter of money.  If you are inclined to build on Hobbes’ premises, money is a tool of the State for ordering the affairs of society.  If you build on Locke’s foundation, money is a utility contrived first by individuals to facilitate commerce.  If we revisit the debate between Keynesian and Austrian economics, these two presumptions about the nature of money animate each philosophy.  Keynes presumed an essentially Progressive, statist understanding of human government.  His prescriptions for monetary policy follow quite logically.

The problem with Keynesian economics at this point in history (which Traub at least recognizes to be singular) is he could not have foreseen either the computer or how it has changed banking on the one hand and supply-chain management on the other.  Neither could he have entertained the deployment of massive amounts of capital to essentially speculative financial products – most of which would have been illegal in his time.  These two things have conspired to elevate what Keynes called the “Zero Level Boundary” to a point above zero where money has been made so cheap that the actual creation of new wealth (by improving things) cannot compete with speculation and stock buy-backs for available capital.  Or in other words: when the chips are free, who wouldn't gamble?

But putting that otherwise necessary debate aside, Traub believes the elites are on the side of Madame History, so let’s consult with her.

The First and Second Bishops Wars (late 1630s - early 1640s) revolved around church order and leadership.  Today it is hard to appreciate the degree to which social order broadly speaking depended on church order in this time.  Charles I tried to enforce ecclesiastical uniformity throughout his kingdom, but the Scots were not having it.  Charles assembled an army to impose his order despite difficulty raising the needed money.  The First Bishops War resulted in further negotiations.  The resulting repudiation of Anglican order resulted in the calling of a Parliament, which subsequently demanded redress for both ecclesiastical and economic (tax) grievances.

Charles responded by dissolving Parliament.  This time, to raise the needed funds to pay his soldiers, he confiscated the gold held in the Royal Mint as a forced loan.  This gold did not belong to the Crown but to English merchants.  While the loans were paid back, as a result of this monetary impunity merchants began depositing their gold with trusted goldsmiths.  They received a receipt in return.

These receipts then began to circulate in place of the gold as a medium of exchange for goods and services.  The goldsmiths also realized that not all receipts would be presented for redemption at once and began issuing ‘extra’ receipts, lending them out at interest.  ‘Fractional reserve banking’ was born and these receipts became a forerunner to paper money (e.g. the Federal Reserve Note).

There are two things about this history which are instructive for us today: The first is the confiscation of the money supply by a ‘sovereign’ to enforce his preferred order on society.  Those who understand Hobbes’ philosophy also understand that a ‘sovereign’ need not be a monarch.  A bureaucracy, or an assemblage of them such as the European Union, can wield the power of a sovereign just as can a monarch and its palace. And that bureaucratic sovereign can rule with the same impunity which eventually drove matters to the English Civil Wars. But that impunity is not possible without control of the money supply. Second, this history clearly validates the premise that money is (and always will be) first a utility contrived by individuals to engage in everyday commerce.

It also exposes the underlying problem of monetary policy we face today: It should be clear that those (Traub and his elites) who espouse a Hobbesian philosophy of government would view money as a tool of the State.  Too bad history is not on their side.  And those Traub so artfully calls ignorant ‘fist shakers’ – well, they just want their money back.

Money and ‘Globalization’

Traub believes ‘globalization’ to be the root of the problem and caricatures the ‘fist shakers’ as older, xenophobic rabble pining for the cultural homogeneity of the past. This is a convenient straw man, as it does not account for the underlying stream of Scottish Common Sense Realism that continues to animate the thinking of ordinary people and, rather inconveniently, undermines the superiority complex of the elites.

The arguments for globalization generally claim a net economic gain for ‘free trade’ agreements.  But let’s look at the underlying data: First, these claims require that we treat all jobs alike.  For those who work in close proximity to the money supply – controlled as it is by what I will call (deliberately evoking echoes of Dwight Eisenhower) the ‘political/financial complex’ – a service-sector job and a manufacturing job are counted the same.  But when counted separately we see a dramatic shift away from manufacturing jobs toward lower paying, service-sector jobs.  The problems with this are both social and economic.

Economically, we become further and further removed from the creation of wealth.  A manufacturing job is, by definition, a job in which raw materials – which by themselves would be useless – are turned into useful things.  The difference between the value of that useful thing and the value of the underlying raw materials is what wealth is.  A service sector job, on the other hand, merely provides a needed or desired service to a consumer and does not directly contribute to the creation of wealth.

As a result, socially, we become an economy of mansions, butlers and maids.  What is especially maddening about this is it reflects the very income inequality we constantly hear about from the elites.  But if equality were really what the elites were after, they would insist we bring the regular population back into closer proximity to the creation of wealth.

But this is not what is being demanded; the rabble is required to assent to the redistributionist wisdom of the elites who view government, and as a result money, in a way that is fundamentally opposite to the traditions of individual freedom which form the foundation of what it means to be American.  The elites are fundamentally demanding sovereign control over the social order.  Just as did King Charles I.

And the ‘fist shakers’ are saying no.  Just as did the Scots and the English merchants after them.

Money and the ‘Fabrication of Reality’

Traub’s claim that the ‘nativist’ forces on the right – both on the matter of Brexit and here in the United States – are ‘fabricating reality’ is especially rich.  The British population was apparently subject to lies about the dangers of immigration.  Yet in Germany, a citizens’ group is using Google Maps to tag by location the instances of sexual crimes reported as being committed by migrants from the Middle East.  With other parts of the ‘elite’ telling us that women claiming sexual abuse should be believed, Traub and his tribe have some explaining to do: Who, it might be asked, is doing the ‘fabricating’?

And that question only gets more pressing when we look at economic series here in the U.S..  Starting with unemployment: In the late 1970s the U.S. Congress was faced with the hot potato of high unemployment.  Instead of making tough fiscal choices to keep the government from consuming resources which would have been more efficiently deployed by the private sector, they tossed the hot potato over to the Federal Reserve.  The Humphrey-Hawkins Act of 1977 added “full employment” to the Federal Reserve’s original mandate of consumer price stability.

Now if we were to return to the calculation methodology for unemployment prior to the passage of Humphrey-Hawkins, and then plug in the data available from then until now, the utter failure of the Fed to foster full employment would become painfully obvious.  But this would also mean Congress would have to come to terms with a simple fact: the Federal Reserve does not have – and has never had – the necessary tools to foster full employment.  This has always been about Congress hiding from its fiscal responsibilities.  And the ‘reality’ of employment in America has been ‘fabricated’ ever since by changing the calculation methodologies to hide the truth.  Again, it must be asked, who is doing to fabricating?

Then we move to inflation. In the early 1990s the Clinton administration and the Republican Congress led by Newt Gingrich were faced – again – with having to make tough fiscal choices principally to keep Social Security solvent.  And, again, they copped out.  This time they decided to change the manner in which the Consumer Price Index was calculated in order to suppress the growth of government benefits and the costs of borrowing.  It is important here to understand that interest rates are a function of the rate of inflation, which is reported as the Consumer Price Index.  While that might seem arcane, the following is not: No one refinances a debt at a higher interest rate.

So, having copped out on making tough fiscal choices, Clinton-Gingrich sent us down an unsustainable path of borrowing to the point where the United States Treasury, after paying for government programs, does not have enough money to even make the ‘coupon payments’ (also known as interest) on its bonds, to say nothing of redeeming the maturing bonds – the very textbook definition of ‘bankrupt’.  As a result, the reported rate of inflation has to be ‘fabricated’ to support ever-lower interest rates and the ‘debt ceiling’ constantly raised to enable serial refinancing of the national debt.

Thus something as fundamental to consumer prices as rent – which is rising at around eight percent a year – is not counted in the CPI.  Prices such as food and energy – as if the consumer is not impacted by these either – are also not counted.  The ‘experts’ Traub thinks so highly of tell us this is because of the ‘volatility’ of these prices.  Yet even a rudimentary understanding of economics is enough to know that this same volatility is exactly the data which should be warning us of a problem with monetary policy.  But Congress does not want to hear the truth, and so the elites must ‘fabricate reality’.

Be Careful What You Wish For

Traub’s call is for the ‘elites’ to rise up against the ‘ignorant masses’.  Yes, indeed, please do.  But be careful what you wish for.  You just might discover that we are having the very same argument had between Thomas Jefferson and Alexander Hamilton at the beginning of the Republic.  Consider the following comment from Jefferson, especially in light of the last financial crisis and its wave of foreclosures:

If the American People ever allow the banks to control the issuance of their currency, first by inflation and then by deflation, the banks and corporations that will grow up around them will deprive the people of all property until their children wake up homeless on the continent their fathers occupied. The issuing power of money should be taken from the bankers and restored to Congress and the people to whom it belongs. I sincerely believe the banking institutions having the issuing power of money are more dangerous to liberty than standing armies.

What is happening today has been brewing for a long time.  The elites will be exposed for their fabrication of reality and the Scottish Common Sense Realism that forms the philosophical foundation of the American idea of self-government will be vindicated.  The British have struck the first blow in an epic battle that will return us to sound money and the creation of vast amounts of new wealth – and eventually to freedom itself over debt slavery.

And it will be this return to creating wealth measured by sound money that will return us to an economy where that wealth is broadly and justly enjoyed by a thriving and growing middle class who are actually making things again.

https://www.superstation95.com/index.php/money/1557

EVICTION NOTICE - Judge Jeannie - EXPLOSIVE !!!!!

EXPLOSIVE OPENING STATEMENT
 EVICTION NOTICE TO OBAMA AND 
ESTABLISHMENT - "START PACKING!"

OUR CONSTITUTION AND RIGHTS AS AMERICANS

TRUMP, ELECTIONS AND CHANGE

Judge Jeanine

Obama - an Enabler for Islamic Terrorism

Obama Hates Christianity and is an 

Enabler for Islamic Terrorism 

Judge Jeanine

Concentration Camps, Lists of Citizens, and Guillotines

AMERICA  2016:   CONCENTRATION  CAMPS,  LISTS  OF  CITIZENS  AND  GUILLOTINES

America - how Nazi Germany was prior to the Holocaust is EXACTLY how America is today, and history proves what happened to the German people.  The enemy within our nation is following the same Nazi plan to be carried out on the American people .. see below.

Caroline Rausch

June 30, 2016

There are over 800 concentration camps in the United States of America – all fully operational and ready to receive prisoners. They are staffed by Americans, Russians, Chinese and surrounded by full time guards…but they are all empty. 

These camps are to be operated by FEMA (Federal Emergency Management Agency) should martial law be implemented in the United States. Martial law is when the writ of habeas corpus to have a trial by jury is suspended – instead of going to a judge, you go straight to jail.

    Col Oliver North

The Rex 84 Program (designed by Col. Oliver North under orders of former 'president' Richard Nixon) was established based on the flimsy logic that if a mass exodus of illegal aliens crossed the Mexican/US border, they could be quickly rounded up and detained in detention centers by FEMA. Rex 84 allowed many military bases to be closed down and turned into prisons. In all actuality what this covert suppression tactic does accomplish is to allow the government to throw people into prison for no reason, who are not guilty of committing a crime, and have no legal recourse.

The following is a report dictated by a man whose simply goes by 'Mr. Sea'. 'Mr. Sea' is a former inspector for the Joint Chiefs of Staff and the Department of Defense, and I had a chance to speak with him recently:

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                         Ronald Reagan

“On the afternoon of April 7th, during Reagan’s term somewhere in the Washington, D.C. area, I spent four hours at a very secret meeting with people who were risking their lives by being there. There was a general of the U. S. Army, a colonel from Military Intelligence, a colonel for the U. S, Marines, a U.S. Senator, three members of the C.I.A. and a person of very high rank in the military police. During this meeting I was shown materials stamped TOP SECRET.

                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                                             William Colby

One document was signed by President Reagan and the other was signed by William Colby.

Both documents referred to Christians as “The Disrupters”.
 
The CIA document he was shown was created for the Pentagon and stated that the official Department of Justice’s (FBI) terminology for Christians would be “the Disrupter’s Movement.” William Colby's document preceded to outline a plan for the arrest, execution or mental rehabilitation of all “Disrupters”, as follows:

“Stage One: To “terminate with extreme prejudice” (this means to execute in cold blood) all “disrupters” who are publicly interfering with OPERATION CABLESPLICE, a plan to take over all municipal, county and state governments and make them into one federal government over all municipalities and then into a single, world government. (New World Order)

“Stage Two: To arrest,  either on criminal charges or on mental inquest warrants, all “Disrupters” who jeopardize OPERATION CABLESPLICE by their “Fanatical” Religious Lifestyles and/or their emergency preparedness” which would enable them to live outside the government direction or aid under a national emergency. Some stage two “Disrupters” will have to be terminated as they can’t be rehabilitated. Planned rehabilitation will take place in certain detention/concentration camps or special mental wards.

“Stage Three: The arrest of all collaborators and infiltrators who along with “Disrupters” will have their  money confiscated, for it is estimated that half of the wealth in the USA is in their hands.”

After this meeting, in subsequent conversations with a former CIA assassin/NWO agenda supporter whom 'Mr. Sea' interviewed:

“Did we know about these concentration camps? Why, when I was working for the CIA, I want you to know we were the very ones behind the whole concept of this plan to terminate the Christians in America! We sat around discussing how to get rid of the Christians who stood in the way of our NWO. We were the very ones who thought these camps up and before I became a Christian, I used to join with fellow Illuminati types in the CIA who lusted for that hour in which Christians would be legally arrested in America and finally terminated.

Two former NWO supporters, Doc Marquis (Illuminati-type) and Elaine Knost (ex-CIA) were flown to a horror camp in the Mojave Desert which had means for gassing people and ovens for cremating them. All the staff wore black SWAT team uniforms. When Marquis was asked what he thought when he saw this gruesome place, he answered “Sheer joy! I rejoiced at the thought of Christians being terminated in this place. Both Marquis and Knost have been Christians for many years — saved from hell.”

'Mr Sea' continues:

“We are all on a red list or a blue list. Those on the Red List are regarded as enemies of the State. They are the leaders of patriot groups, outspoken ministers, outspoken talk show hosts, community leaders, conservatives and lovers of the Constitution. If you’re on this list, about two weeks before martial law is announced you will be dragged out of your homes at 4 AM and put in a black van, then driven to a helicopter waiting to fly you to a place where you’ll be loaded onto a big 64 passenger Chinook helicopter which will fly you to one of 38 cities where you’ll board a 747 and taken to FEMA detention centers and killed. Those people on the Blue List are also enemies of the NWO and are followers of the Red list folks. They will be rounded up after martial Law takes place and taken to detention centers to be “re-educated”. Various mind-control techniques will be used on them. Most will not survive this.”

There is also a Yellow list for citizens who know nothing about the NWO and don’t want to know. They are considered to be no threat at all and will be instructed as to how to behave and will most likely do whatever they are told. Unfortunately there are too many of them to be effectively controlled, so many will be killed or starved.

All the concentration camps have railroad facilities as well as roads leading to and from them.  Many also have an airport nearby. The majority of them can contain a population of 20,000 prisoners. The largest of these facilities is just outside Fairbanks, Alaska, it is a massive mental health hospital and can hold about 2 million people.

There is a list of these camps on the internet.  You can drive to them and have a look. They are surrounded by fences with the points on top turned inward to keep people in. They usually have a railroad with loading platforms and usually also a landing field. Some also have a lot of black boxes that look like railroad cars — perhaps the ones manufactured in Oregon and outfitted with shackles. And a lot of grey plastic objects that look like caskets have been observed into which 3 bodies could be fitted. Also all the buildings have concrete floors so no tunnels could be dug, and the only way in or out was through turnstiles. Quite scary. 

Ted Gunderson, former FBI agent and whistle blower on many covert and illicit government activities, says the government has set up 1,000 internment ‘death camps’ across the country and is storing 30,000 guillotines and 500,000 caskets in Atlanta. These camps are ready and waiting for the day martial law is declared and the 'government' moves in to round up and kill American dissenters.

Mr. Gunderson also investigated the rise of satanism in the U S. He said there were over three million satanists in America today. In the South Bay area of Los Angeles with a population of 200,000, there are 3,000 practicing satanists. In Iowa City, Iowa, a town of 150,000, there are 1,500 satanists. And in Lincoln, Nebraska they exist, too. He asserts that between 50,000 and 60,000 individuals are sacrificed every year.

His friends say Gunderson was one of the finest, most noble Americans who ever lived. He was kind and gentle, a gentleman and a scholar in the truest sense of the word. The Left tried to smear him and on July 31st, 2011, he was murdered (poisoned) like so many others who try to get the truth out.

Gunderson revealed this: “The “Finders” is a CIA front established in the 1960s. It has top clearance and protection for its assigned task of kidnapping children for purposes of prostitution, pornography, experimental abuse, mind control, white sex slavery, child slave labor in underground facilities and the illegal, un-authorized murder of untold thousands of American children snatched from the streets and playgrounds.”

It seems to me the worst enemy of America is the CIA, which is only a tool used by the evil criminals exploiting our country. The shadowy puppet-masters are the elite power behind the government which controls everything that happens in this country and increasingly the world which they are aiming to wholly control and profit from. These Illumnati-types want to make us their slaves – our only ability to fight back is to protect the freedoms our Founding Fathers gave us.
‘
http://ipatriot.com/america-2016-concentration-camps-lists-citizens-guillotines/