Sunday, August 14, 2016

Shadow Government: WikiLeaks Exposes George Soros Controlling Hillary Clinton


Shadow Government: WikiLeaks Exposes George Soros Controlling Hilllary Clinton


Saturday, August 13, 2016

A DOCTOR has made shocked claims we are purposefully being poisoned –


 
A DOCTOR has made shocked claims we are purposefully being poisoned
 
so the pharmaceutical industry can cash in on the cure.
By JON AUSTINExpress.co.uk
Wed, Jun 29, 2016
Dr Leonard Horowitz, 48, a former university medical researcher, has been branded “dangerous” by many medics because of the outlandish conspiracy theories he pushes on his website, which also promote natural and alternative therapies.
One of Dr Horowitz’s most long-standing claims is governments have conspired with major pharmaceutical companies to make large segments of the population sick, through the spraying of certain chemicals into the air through the so-called “chemtrail” emissions of jet planes.
He claims a mystery flu-like illness has been increasing since the late 1990s.
Dr Horowitz said: “We have seen this type of an epidemic since the end of 1998 and the beginning of 1999.
“People have been hacking and coughing with this bizarre illness that does not seem to follow any logical viral or bacterial onset and transition period.
“If it was a really bacterial or a viral infection, it would have caused a fever but it didn’t.
“It lasts for weeks, if not months. Sinus congestion, sinus drainage, cough, fatigue, general malaise. People have been feeling ‘off’.
“I believe the chemtrails are responsible for a chemical intoxication of the public, which would then cause a general immune suppression, low grade to high grade, depending on exposure.
The Rest…HERE

Did Custer Use a Fudged CENTCOM Report?


Did  Custer  Use  a  Fudged  CENTCOM  Report?

IT IS TIME TO TAKE OUR COUNTRY BACK




IT  IS  TIME  TO  TAKE  OUR  COUNTRY  BACK




A JOURNEYMAN - NOT AN APPRENTICE - ELECTRICIAN EXPLAINS FAULTY SMART METERS

A Journeyman — Not an Apprentice — Electrician Explains Faulty Smart Meters

By Catherine J. Frompovich

AMI Smart Meters are being rolled out across the globe, especially in the USA where there is much opposition to various aspects regarding their being retrofitted on to electric, natural gas, and water utility services replacing safe, non-EMF-polluting analog meters.
 
From 1981 to 2008 Robert Marx of Redford, Michigan, worked as a journeyman electrician.  Obviously, he is qualified to discuss electric meters.  In the video below, he explains what he’s found on an AMI Smart Meter that’s been removed from a meter housing/box.

Apparently, the removed AMI Smart Meter shows what happens when a Smart Meter is retrofitted on to the former analog meter box and busbars [1] don’t line up and cause overheating to occur.

AMI Smart Meters are dangerous for many reasons, especially what you will learn in this 10 minute educational video.  Robert talks about flickering lights and appliance interruption, which many folks experience since AMI Smart Meters have been forced on homeowners electric services.

Consumers may want to save this information in the event you, God forbid, experience a Smart Meter fire and have to fight with your insurance company, the utility company or even your state public utility commission for not providing SAFE replacements meters.


https://youtu.be/lM-UZzxV5SA?

One thing I’ve learned from researching Smart Meter fires is this:  If you experience a house fire started by the retrofitted AMI Smart Meter, do everything in your power to keep that meter as proof, as both utility company personnel and firemen will try to remove it ASAP and destroy the evidence!

References:

[1] https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Busbar
Image Credit: David Dees Art (modified)
Catherine J Frompovich (website) is a retired natural nutritionist who earned advanced degrees in Nutrition and Holistic Health Sciences, Certification in Orthomolecular Theory and Practice plus Paralegal Studies. Her work has been published in national and airline magazines since the early 1980s. Catherine authored numerous books on health issues along with co-authoring papers and monographs with physicians, nurses, and holistic healthcare professionals. She has been a consumer healthcare researcher 35 years and counting.
Catherine’s latest book, published October 4, 2013, is Vaccination Voodoo, What YOU Don’t Know About Vaccines, available on Amazon.com.
Her 2012 book A Cancer Answer, Holistic BREAST Cancer Management, A Guide to Effective & Non-Toxic Treatments, is available on Amazon.com and as a Kindle eBook.
Two of Catherine’s more recent books on Amazon.com are Our Chemical Lives And The Hijacking Of Our DNA, A Probe Into What’s Probably Making Us Sick (2009) and Lord, How Can I Make It Through Grieving My Loss, An Inspirational Guide Through the Grieving Process (2008)
Catherine’s NEW book: Eat To Beat Disease, Foods Medicinal Qualities ©2016 Catherine J Frompovich is now available

This one is for the famous Tom Heneghan and the male love of his life


Is Al Gore Hissing At Her?


Al Gore attending an opening for homeless children’s centre didn’t go over as well as it should have when this photo surfaced the following day.

HOW could a tiny child cause such a reaction in what is SUPPOSED to be a mature experienced career politician?!

Perhaps the REAL Gore (reptilian blood drinking vial carried in his briefcase) is coming through??

Just one more clue about the REAL Al Gore! 

The Dog Knew About Monica Before Everyone Else


 
The Dog Knew About Monica Before Everyone Else



 
THIS IS A CLONE OF HILLARY AS THE REAL ONE PARTS HER HAIR ON HER RIGHT...ALSO HER TEETH ARE OT RIGHT....
Former U.S. President Bill Clinton with his wife Hillary Clinton, and a very
perceptive canine. The dog definitely smells something strange going on here. Perhaps, he was the first to know about Clinton’s infamous Presidential scandal. We should have asked the dog.

POLICE ARE USING SECRETIVE "STINGRAY" CELL PHONE SURVEILLANCE


SURPRISE: Vancouver  Police  Are  Using  Secretive  “Stingray”

 Cell  Phone  Surveillance


By Derrick Broze
 


Vancouver police have become the first Canadian police force to admit to using a controversial cellphone monitoring tool sometimes known as a Stingray.

Amidst mounting pressure from civil liberties groups, the Vancouver Police have confirmed that they have used a cell site simulator, popularly known as a “stingray,” on at least one occasion. The admission is the first of its kind by a municipal police force in Canada.

The Guardian reports:
The revelation came after a year-long push by a coalition of civil rights organisations and Vancouver’s Pivot Legal Society. In a recent letter to police, the groups asked Vancouver police two pointed questions: whether police had used stingray and if they would do so again.“And they responded with yes and yes,” said Micheal Vonn of the British Columbia Civil Liberties Association, who posted the answer on the organisation’s blog earlier this week.Vancouver police confirmed to the Guardian that the device had been used in 2007 as an investigative tool in a suspected abduction that is now considered a possible homicide.
So what is a stingray?

The Electronic Frontier Foundation describes stingrays as “a brand name of an IMSI (International Mobile Subscriber Identity) Catcher targeted and sold to law enforcement. A Stingray works by masquerading as a cell phone tower – to which your mobile phone sends signals to every 7 to 15 seconds whether you are on a call or not – and tricks your phone into connecting to it.” As a result, whoever is in possession of the Stingray can figure out who, when, and to where you are calling, the precise location of every device within the range, and with some devices, even capture the content of your conversations.

Both the Harris Corp. who manufacture the stingrays and the Federal Bureau of Investigations require police to sign non-disclosure agreements (NDA) related to the use of the devices. Through these NDAs local police departments have become subordinate to Harris, and even in court cases in front of a judge, are not allowed to speak on the details of their arrangements

This has created a dangerous precedent which allows law enforcement on the local, state, and federal level to operate the devices with impunity. Americans (and Canadians) remain largely ignorant to the fact that numerous agencies are gathering their private information without a warrant.

The Vancouver police allege that they do not own a stingray, but simply requested assistance from the Royal Canadian Mounted Police. The RCMP approved the request based on “exigent circumstances.” The Vancouver police claim they did not operate the device and that it was only used in an attempt to locate a specific cellphone owned by a person who was reported missing.

However, even if that is true, because of the way the device works, even if the police were only searching for one cellphone they would have inadvertently gathered data from dozens if not hundreds of other phones in the area. What exactly happens to that mistakenly gathered data? No one knows and the police are not telling.

 

The process of obtaining the data on the stingrays was not easy. For over a year civil liberties groups battled with the police’s privacy commissioner who refused to comply with the request for data about the devices. Initially, Vancouver police claimed they did not have the device and never used one. However, as the Guardian reported, a testimony from one officer discusses personally using stingrays in 30 different cases and on 50 different suspects. Another officer said the RCMP has a large warehouse in an unknown location where the authorities test and develop stingray technology.

Thankfully, the public is slowly becoming aware of the devices and beginning to fight back. In the U.S., Illinois Governor Bruce Rauner recently signed legislation which creates new limits on how law enforcement can use surveillance devices known as cell site simulators, or “stingrays.” According to the Tenth Amendment Center, the new law will prohibit the use of stingrays except to locate or track the location of a communications device or to identify a communications device.

What do you think? Do the people of Canada have any reason to trust the authorities when they promise they have only used the devices one time?

Image Credit: TheFreeThoughtProject.com

Derrick Broze is an investigative journalist and liberty activist. He is the Lead Investigative Reporter for ActivistPost.com and the founder of the TheConsciousResistance.com. Follow him on Twitter. Derrick is the author of two books: The Conscious Resistance: Reflections on Anarchy and Spirituality and Finding Freedom in an Age of Confusion.
Derrick is available for interviews. Please contact Derrick@activistpost.com

Government advises airlines to spray pesticides on passengers


Government advises airlines to spray pesticides on passengers

OH LOOK ..... SHE IS SPRAYING CHANEL NO 5...
COUGH-COUGH ...YOU'RE DEAD!!!
August 7, 2016

(NaturalHealth365) Have you ever felt sick after flying, only to assume it’s jetlag or a virus you picked up from another passenger? Well, think again!  You might have been exposed to an insecticide, pesticides or other toxic chemicals – deliberately used by airline staff.

I think airline passengers should be outraged to know that poisonous chemicals are now being sprayed on planes regularly – DURING the flight, while travelers are inside the plane, This is true – the United States government is actually pushing this agenda of poisoning passengers.

You can’t make this stuff up: Check out this disturbing video – does this look right to you?


Reminds me of Nazi Germany: Are airplane cabins safe or a gas chamber?

This process is being referred to as “disinsection,” a word that seems to have been made up by the TSA or airline industry. Disinsection, or the spraying of an insecticide or pesticides on planes, is now permitted under international law. The Department of Transportation says that the supposed intent is to protect public health, crops and agriculture, and the environment.

The International Civil Aviation Organization and World Health Organization (WHO) admit that aircraft cabins are being sprayed with what they are calling a “fast-acting insecticide” with passengers on board, right before takeoff.  Some airlines are instead treating aircraft interiors with a “residual-insecticide aerosol” right before passengers get on board.

This is truly sickening behavior: These toxic chemicals are also being applied directly to the aircraft’s internal surfaces and, to make matters worse, passengers get to breathe in this crap into their lungs.

In this next video, airline passengers are being sprayed with toxic chemicals during a flight and the airline staff person says, ‘don’t film!’ (Check out her facial expression – while spraying passengers – it says it all)
Passengers automatically agree to being sprayed with pesticides when buying airline tickets!!
The spraying of toxic chemicals like pesticides or an insecticide inside an enclosed, pressurized airplane cabin is beyond alarming. It is an assault on the senses and nervous systems of the passengers of the plane. Those with a pre-existing health condition or compromised immune system are even more at risk for suffering unwanted health effects.

However, all passengers exposed to these toxic chemicals “agree” to the conditions, even if they aren’t aware of it.  The fact that spraying will occur on a flight is stated in the fine print when the airline tickets are purchased. Passengers implicitly agree to being sprayed just by buying a ticket for a flight where these practices will take place.
Serious health issues reported from toxic pesticides and insecticides sprayed on planes
Many airline passengers are already reporting negative health effects from exposure to toxic chemicals on flights. For example, flu-like symptoms, sinus issues, rash/hives, headaches and swollen joints are just some of the horrible effects. However, far more serious issues like acute respiratory problems and anaphylactic shock have occurred. Chronic issues affecting the neurological and immune systems have also been reported.

The most common aircraft pesticides used on airplanes are synthetic pyrethroids, specifically permethrin and d-phenothrin. Remember, they kill insects by attacking their nervous systems.

What are these chemicals doing to human nervous systems? Numerous studies have linked permethrin with Parkinson’s disease. (this has got to stop!)
Buyer beware: WHO denies health and safety issues from airline insecticides
Not surprising, at this time, the World Health Organization is downplaying the symptoms and concerns voiced by passengers. They state “there’s no evidence” that these insecticide sprays cause risk to human health, and that the sprays are safe.

The arrogance of these statements is appalling. Even a layperson knows not to use chemical sprays in an area that is not ventilated. In the short term, the only recourse is to avoid flights where this practice takes place. However, airlines should be strongly petitioned to find non-toxic methods of dealing with pests.

Bottom line: Before you take that flight – make a phone call to your airline of choice and ask the question, “are you spraying insecticides on this flight.”

Source:  http://www.naturalhealth365.com/pesticides-toxic-chemicals-1927.html

SEND THIS TO  "ALL" YOUR FRIENDS AND TELL THEM TO MAKE THIS ONE GO VIRAL...

FBI Agents: CLINTON AND LORETTA LYNCH MADE "INSIDE DEAL"


FBI  AGENTS:   BILL  CLINTON  AND  LORETTA  LYNCH  MADE  "INSIDE  DEAL"

With the ever increasing body count following every Clinton move, you would say "YES!" to Clinton's demands to fudge, wouldn't you?!



According to FBI agents, who spoke anonymously to the
New York Post last week, there is widespread skepticism within the Bureau regarding that infamous meeting between Bill Clinton and Attorney General Loretta Lynch. 

"FBI agents believe there was an inside deal put in place after the Loretta Lynch/Bill Clinton tarmac meeting,” a source told the paper.  That meeting, which occurred only a few days before FBI Director James Comey announced his decision not to recommend Hillary Clinton for prosecution, has been the subject of intense controversy.

 While Clinton and Lynch insist that they spent 30 minutes 'chatting about their grandchildren and other idle topics', the stunning appearance of impropriety gave critics even more cause to question the FBI’s decision.

Adding fuel to the fire, it’s now been revealed that FBI agents involved in the investigation were forced to sign something called a “Case Briefing Acknowledgment.” This form, which amounts to a non-disclosure agreement, struck the Post’s FBI sources as suspiciousThis is very, very unusual,” one retired FBI official said. “I’ve never signed one, never circulated one to others.”

FBI agents are routinely required to sign NDAs to get security clearance, but the special CBA form is reserved only for the rarest and most sensitive cases. At the very least, it proves that the FBI’s inquiry into Hillary’s email situation was, from the beginning, a criminal investigation and not a “security review.” If anyone ever bought into that in the first place.

No one in America should be surprised to see someone with political power escape justice; this is not exactly the first time we’ve watched someone powerful get away with something. 

What’s surprising in this case is the audacity. If Comey had come out and said, “Yeah, she’s guilty, but she’s protected,” it would have only been slightly more obvious than it actually is. It’s almost like Hillary and Obama decided to test the boundaries of what the American public would put up with. (And Americans CONTINUE to yawn and go their merry way while the 'bad guys' CONTINUE to commit crimes against them - all the way to the coming death camps.)

But then, that shouldn’t be surprising, either, because both of them have been conducting those tests for years. 

Hmm, how flagrantly can we violate the Constitution? 

Hmm, how blatantly can we use the State Department as a funnel for political donations? 

Hmm, how thoroughly can we ignore Islamic terrorism?

The scary part isn’t that they’re conducting these tests. The scary part is that they have not, apparently, found that elusive limit yet.

http://unfilteredpatriot.com/fbi-agents-bill-clinton-and-loretta-lynch-made-inside-deal/ 

And various dinar 'intel' report websites as well as the channelers of demons CONTINUE to report that the cabal is on the run, has left planet Earth, and that the 'good' guys ("white hats") are in charge!!!???  Say WHAT?  Our question is: where's the PROOF of their statements, because the BAD guys STRONGLY appear to REMAIN in charge, and we the people are STILL being held in bondage and slavery - while most in this nation are asleep as usual.

America, the tanks and nukes are now appearing on the horizon and STILL you stand there ignoring the evidence and warnings and doing NOTHING to put a stop to it.  

Presidential election will be rigged?


PRESIDENTIAL  'ELECTION'  WILL  BE  RIGGED??

By Stephen Dietrich, Managing Editor



Republican presidential candidate Donald Trump warned supporters to be vigilant in November, suggesting in no uncertain terms that the general election could be rigged.
Trump is right — vote rigging is possible. Experts have warned about this for decades.

The statement caused an immediate media backlash, and liberal journalists in an uproar accused Trump of attacking the very foundation of democracy. And to these media talking heads’ credit, it does sound like a tale from the pages of a John Grisham novel -  a secret conspiracy to rig electronic voter machines and steal elections, put in place by establishment power brokers as a way to keep conservatives in line. It’s uncovered by a plucky mathematics wiz, who faces dangerous opposition at every turn. She races in time to get the word out… but no one would believe her?  It sounds too fantastic for most voters to believe, but it’s not.

The threat is very real. It COULD be happening in the United States right now.

That’s according to The Wichita Eagle, which recently reported on Wichita State University mathematician Dr. Beth Clarkson and her multi-year struggle to discover the truth behind suspected widespread voter fraud across Kansas — and possibly the entire United States, and that very thought is unacceptable.

It all traces back to electronic voting machines, and Clarkson is on a mission to uncover the truth.  “Roughly 70 percent of states in the U.S. use some form of electronic voting,” according to CBS News reporter Mireya Villarreal, and hackers say the problems with electronic voting machines have been around for years.

“The machines and the software are old and antiquated. But now with millions heading to the polls in three months, security experts are sounding the alarm.”

Clarkson, a certified quality engineer with a doctorate in statistics, has been sounding this same alarm for years. She says her calculations from the November 2014 election showed “inexplicable discrepancies” that suggested “some voting systems were being sabotaged.” After analyzing election returns at a precinct level, Clarkson found that candidate support was connected to the size of the precinct.

In Republican primaries specifically, she claims numbers indicate a bias against Tea Party conservatives in favor of Republican establishment candidates.

The problem isn’t limited to Kansas, either, and Clarkson wasn’t the first to note such U.S. election anomalies. Concerns over the integrity of U.S. elections have been widespread for years.

A 2012 paper found possible evidence that Mitt Romney’s primary win over more hardliner conservatives was aided by the same type of electronic voting patterns.

More recently, opponents of Democratic presidential candidate Hillary Clinton argued that election fraud was repeatedly committed throughout her 2016 primary win against Vermont Sen. Bernie Sanders. One Stanford research paper suggested the odds that Clinton did NOT commit widespread fraud in the primary to be 1 in 77 billion.  “For $15 and in-depth knowledge of the card, you could hack the vote,” Brian Varner, the principle researcher at software security company Symantec, told Villarreal during a demonstration.

So what can be done against this?

Authorities must implement a national audit system for electronic voting machines. To get them to comply, voters must demand it.

Clarkson went to court to get access to the paper audit trails from voting machines, but a district court ruled she couldn’t have access to those paper trails.  That is troublesome.

The very foundation of our American democracy is based on the integrity of our elections. The very notion that it is plausible that any of our elections could be rigged is totally and completely unacceptable.

So Trump is right. We need to be vigilant. We need to heed the warnings of experts.

It’s time we demand a national audit of these systems.
Our democracy depends upon it.

https://thehornnews.com/presidential-election-will-rigged/

JOHN MCCAIN BUSTED! ‘MISFILED’ CIA RECORDING PROVES HIS ENTIRE CAREER BUILT ON A LIE


 

JOHN MCCAIN BUSTED! ‘MISFILED’ CIA RECORDING PROVES HIS ENTIRE CAREER BUILT ON A LIE


Aug112016
 

The Next News Network
Published on Aug 10, 2016
Sub for more: http://nnn.is/the_new_media | An audio recording has surfaced proving that U.S. Senator John McCain collaborated with the North Vietnamese by recording a “Tokyo Rose”-style propaganda message that was broadcast on North Vietnamese radio in 1969. For many years, American former P.O.W.s who were in the “Hanoi Hilton” North Vietnamese prison with John McCain called him a “Songbird” who collaborated with the enemy against his own country. Stewart Rhodes joins Gary Franchi to discuss the implications,
Got Kids or Grandkids? They’ll love our new Kids Channel:
(( SUBSCRIBE ))
http://bit.ly/sub-to-Banchi-Brothers
See the report here:https://youtu.be/EHF0yXrwr-0
Read more:https://www.oathkeepers.org/breaking-…
McCain Recording Credit TRUNEWS:https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zO0mH…

It Just Looks So Wrong

U.S. Republican presidential nominee, Senator John McCain, makes some weird gestures toward (then) Democratic presidential candidate, Senator Barack Obama at the end of their debate.
 

5 TIMES OBAMA SUPPORTED VOTER FRAUD !!!

The perfect dictatorship



Rand Paul, Judge Jeanine, Napolitano All Say “Lock Her Up”! The Gloves Are Off!

 
 

Rand Paul, Judge Jeanine, Napolitano All Say “Lock Her Up”! The Gloves Are Off!


Aug122016
 

ProjectClarity
Published on Aug 12, 2016
Now it’s not just Trump supporters saying “Lock Her Up”, It’s a major US senator and two Judges. We have the DOJ saying they won’t allow a Clinton Foundation probe, FBI Comey wanting to indict on the Hillary emails but then doesn’t, new email leaks by Judicial Watch that show ambassador Steven’s schedule was hacked from Hillary Clinton emails, emails leaks that led to the assassination of a scientist and undercover agents, and Clinton Foundation ties to the State Department. Come on now!!! What does Hillary have to do to get indicted and prosecuted. Like Trump said earlier in his primary run, I could short someone in downtown NY and they would still support me. That’s the extent of criminality going on with Obama and the DOJ, as well as, Comey himself. The gloves are now off and the media and some politicians are turning against Hillary in a big way. The reports of her health issues are everywhere now. Unfortunately Trump needs all the help he can get, because he keeps stabbing himself in the back. Can either of them actually physically or mentally make it to the finish line? What if they both drop out