Mandatory vaccination in CA: let's school a Federal Judge

Mandatory vaccination in CA: let's school a Federal Judge (To read about Jon's mega-collection, Exit From The Matrix, click here.) Mandatory vaccination in CA: let's school a Federal Judge   Judge Sabraw: here's something you didn't know about the DPT shot...   By Jon Rappoport   I'll repeat myself a bit here, in case you missed my last article. Then I'll get into something else, something dangerous that a Federal Judge knows nothing about...   Federal Judge Dana Sabraw is overseeing a lawsuit against mandatory vaccination in California.   So far, Sabraw has denied a petition to suspend mandatory vaccination for school children while the case moves forward.   He believes tradition and history are on the side of forced vaccinations. That's because he doesn't know what he's talking about. Or he's just making it up out of thin air.   As the LA Times reports: ""U.S. District Judge Dana Sabraw in San Diego wrote that state Legislatures have 'a long history of requiring children to be vaccinated as a condition to school enrollment, and for as many years, both state and federal courts have upheld those requirements against constitutional challenge'."   I don't see how Judge Sabraw's opinion could be more ridiculous.      Why? Because 'the long history' he refers to is quite different.   The states have always upheld exemptions from vaccination on several grounds: medical waiver, religious objection, philosophical objection. Hello? THAT'S the tradition.   SB277, the new CA law, goes against the tradition, to say the very least. SB277 breaks new ground in allowing the state to operate as a medical fascist in the area of vaccinations.   So...let's look at one of the mandatory vaccines that'll be injected into children in California, whether their parents agree or not. I'm talking about the DTP shot---diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis (whooping cough). Let's give Judge Sabraw a history lesson. You know: actual history.   Buckle up.   "Assistant Secretary of Health Edward Brandt, Jr., MD, testifying before the U.S. Senate Committee on Labor and Human Resources, rounded... figures off to 9,000 cases of convulsions, 9,000 cases of collapse, and 17,000 cases of high-pitched screaming for a total of 35,000 acute neurological reactions occurring within forty-eight hours of a DPT shot among America's children every year." (DPT: A Shot in the Dark, by Harris L. Coulter and Barbara Loe Fischer, Harcourt Brace Jovanovich)   "... Based on the only U.S. findings on adverse DPT reactions, an FDA-financed study at the University of California, Los Angeles, one out of every 350 children will have a convulsion; one in 180 children will experience high-pitched screaming; and one in 66 will have a fever of 105 degrees or more [all signs of acute and very serious neurological reaction]." (Jennifer Hyman, Democrat and Chronicle, Rochester, New York, special supplement on DPT, dated April, 1987)   "A study undertaken in 1979 at the University of California, Los Angeles, under the sponsorship of the Food and Drug Administration, and which has been confirmed by other studies, indicates that in the U.S.A. approximately 1,000 infants die annually as a direct result of DPT vaccinations, and these are classified as SIDS (Sudden Infant Death Syndrome) deaths. These represent about 10 to 15% of the total number of SIDS deaths occurring annually in the U.S.A. (between 8,000 and 10,000 depending on which statistics are used)." (Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, CW Daniel Company Limited, Saffron Walden, Essex, England, 1987)   "...in 1970/71, there were more than 33,000 cases of pertussis with 41 fatal cases among the very well immunized British child population; whereas in 1974/75, with a declining rate of vaccination, a pertussis epidemic caused only 25,000 cases with 25 fatalities." (Wolfgang Ehrengut, Lancet, Feb. 18, 1978, p. 370)   "... Barker and Pichichero, in a prospective study of 1232 children in Denver, Colorado, found after DTP that only 7% of those vaccinated were free from untoward reactions, which included pyrexia (53%), acute behavioral changes (82%), prolonged screaming (13%), and listlessness, anorexia and vomiting. 71% of those receiving second injections of DTP experienced two or more of the reactions monitored." (Lancet, May 28, 1983, p. 1217)   "Publications by the World Health Organization show that diphtheria is steadily declining in most European countries, including those in which there has been no immunization. The decline began long before vaccination was developed. There is certainly no guarantee that vaccination will protect a child against the disease; in fact, over 30,000 cases of diphtheria have been recorded in the United Kingdom in fully immunized children." (Leon Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 58)   "Pertussis (whooping cough) immunization is controversial, as the side effects have received a great deal of publicity. The counter claim is that the effectiveness and protection offered by the procedure far outweigh the possible ill effects... annual deaths, per million children, from this disease over the period from 1900 to the mid-nineteen seventies, shows that from a high point of just under 900 deaths per million children (under age 15) in 1905, the decline has been consistent and dramatic. There had been a lowering of mortality rates of approximately 80% by the time immunization was introduced on a mass scale, in the mid-nineteen fifties. The decline has continued, albeit at a slower rate, ever since. No credit can be given to vaccination for the major part of the decline since it was not in use." (Chaitow, Vaccination and Immunization, p. 63)   Again, the DPT shot will be required and mandatory in California for school children.   It helps to know history, especially since major media refuse to touch the truth with a ten-foot pole.   Shoot your child up with the DPT vaccine?   Go along to get along?   Bury your head in the sand? Use this link to order Jon's Matrix Collections. Jon Rappoport The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can find this article and more at NoMoreFakeNews.com.

Conspiracy of Silence - Full Banned Documentary (1994)

Conspiracy of Silence

Full Banned Documentary (1994)

Published on Apr 26, 2012

 

Conspiracy of Silence is a powerful, disturbing documentary revealing a U.S. child sex abuse and pedophilia ring that leads to the highest levels of government. Featuring intrepid investigator John DeCamp, a highly decorated Vietnam war veteran and 16-year Nebraska state senator, Conspiracy of Silence reveals how rogue elements at all levels of government have been involved in systematic child sex abuse and pedophilia to feed the base desires of key politicians.

Source: http://www.wanttoknow.info/060501cons...

For revealing, declassified documents related to Conspiracy of Silence:
http://www.WantToKnow.info/mind_contr...

 

 

Hacking Democracy - How To Steal A National Election For Hillary - August 27, 2016

---we need to go back to paper ballots.....

Show original message

On Tuesday, August 23, 2016

 

Here is how it’s done...rigging elections. Watch and pass it on.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TdzlnwWsAAU

 

https://youtu.be/t75xvZ3osFg 

 

US elections, RIGGED Computer Programmer TESTIFIES Congressional Meeting. ELECTION FRAUD! https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nafAbO5qRrU

Hillary Clinton's election fraud finally exposed. California stolen from Bernie Sanders!

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nafAbO5qRrU

 

Here is how it’s done...rigging elections. Watch and pass it on.

This is how Hillary will win the election........FOR THOSE THAT

THINK IT CAN'T BE DONE

Every Republican needs to watch this video. And It

needs to be sent to every man and woman that votes

this year.

CORPORATE STATE OF WISCONSIN_DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE_AG JAMES E DOYLE

AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.

Office of the Chairman / Chief Executive Officer

4001 North 9 th Street, Suite No. 227

Arlington, Virginia, USA  22203-1954

Commonwealth of Virginia

_________________________________________________

 

https://twitter.com/eagleonetowanta

https://twitter.com/diplomate418

http://eagleonetowanta.com

https://vimeo.com/158213524

http://eagleonetowanta.com/?page_id=10

https://vimeo.com/user16311094/review/160965789/b57fb62f43

http://fbicover-up.com/

http://eagleonetowanta.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/06/DEATH-OF-WHITE-HOUSE-DEPUTY-COUNSEL-VINCE-FOSTER.pdf

http://eagleonetowanta.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/08/AMB-LEO-WANTA-vs-CORPORATE-STATE-OF-WIS_U-S-SUPREME-....pdf

HITLERY: Benghazi Material in New Cache of Emails

COURT  ORDERS  NEW  CLINTON  EMAIL  PRODUCTION  BY  SEPTEMBER  1

State Admits Benghazi Material in New Cache of Emails Clinton Failed to Produce

AUGUST 25, 2016

Judicial Watch (Washington DC)
  
Judicial Watch today announced that a federal court has ordered the State Department to review newly found Clinton emails and turn over responsive records by September 13.  And, in two other Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) lawsuits, the State Department is scheduled to release additional emails from former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s non-state.gov email system beginning September 30.  

In a court filing this week, the State Department admitted it had found Benghazi-related documents among the 14,900 Clinton emails and attachments uncovered by the FBI that Mrs. Clinton deleted and withheld from the State Department.

The first batch of new emails comes in response to a court order issued today in a November 13, 2015, Judicial Watch FOIA lawsuit filed against the Department of State seeking all communications between former Secretary of State Hillary Clinton and the Obama White House from the day of the terrorist attack on the U.S. Consulate in Benghazi and throughout the following week.  

The lawsuit was filed on behalf of Dr. Larry Kawa of Boca Raton, Florida, in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of Florida, West Palm Beach Division (Larry Kawa v. U.S. Department of State (No. 9:15-cv-81560)).  

Today’s order requiring the production of the emails from the 14,900 new Clinton emails as well as any other communications or emails from the other materials recently delivered to the State Department by the FBI was issued by U.S. District Court Judge William P. Dimitrouleas.  The court ruled:

The State Department shall search the material, determine whether any responsive records exist, and complete its first production of non-exempt records, to the extent any exist, by September 13, 2016.

In a separate case, Judicial Watch has been seeking Clinton’s communications about the attack on the American diplomatic compound in Benghazi, Libya, during which U.S. Ambassador Christopher Stevens and Foreign Service Officer Sean Smith were killed.  

A second assault targeted a nearby compound, killing two government contractors Tyrone Woods and Glen Doherty. (Judicial Watch, Inc. v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:15-cv-00692)).

After admitting in an August 23 court filing that it found documents that “satisfied the [Benghazi related] search terms” of the new Clinton emails, the State Department proposed a rolling production schedule, “under which State would make its first production of any non-exempt responsive records subject to FOIA on September 30, 2016, and complete production no later than October 31, 2016.” 

Judicial Watch then asked the court that State make known the volume of documents remaining to be reviewed before it accepts whether the production schedule is reasonable.  

Today, U.S. District Court Judge Amit P. Mehta informed the attorneys the Court wants to schedule a hearing on this issue for Tuesday, August 30.

Judicial Watch is also scheduled to receive documents from the State Department in a case arising out of FOIA lawsuit before Judge Emmet G. Sullivan that seeks records about the controversial employment status of Huma Abedin, former Deputy Chief of Staff to Clinton.  

The lawsuit was reopened because of revelations about the clintonemail.com system. (Judicial Watch v. U.S. Department of State (No. 1:13-cv-01363)). Judge Sullivan has now issued a court order stating:

[T]he State Department shall release all remaining documents responsive to Judicial Watch’s Freedom of Information Act request by no later than September 30, 2016.

The 14,900 new Clinton emails were uncovered

as a result of separate Judicial Watch litigation seeking all of Mrs. Clinton’s work related emails.  At a status hearing this week, U.S. District Court Judge James E. Boasberg ordered the State Department to report to the Court the volume of documents reviewed and be prepared to commit to a production schedule at a further status hearing on September 23, 2016.

“It is astonishing that Hillary Clinton tried to delete and hide Benghazi emails and documents. No wonder federal courts in Florida and DC are ordering the State Department to stop stalling and begin releasing the 14,900 new Clinton emails,” stated Judicial Watch President Tom Fitton.

Read more about Hillary Clinton email scandal, Huma Employment 

http://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/court-orders-new-clinton-email-production-september-13/

Good morning!

GOOD  MORNING!

 ESPECIALLY SLAVEMAN AND MARIE! 

YOU, TOO, JACKIE S!!!

HAHAHHAH!

 

 GOTCHA!!!

Hitlery: That will cost you!

    

THE CAJUN NAVY - You Wanna Save Lives? You Gotta Have a Permit!!

The  State  of  Louisiana  says:

You  Wanna  Save  Lives?   You  Gotta  Have  a  Permit!! 

Yeah, "government" ain't so bad, huh? They just wanna make rescuing people without a permit ILLEGAL! How absolutely ABSURD do things have to get before people wake up? Share this everywhere.

Louisiana native, Kenny Clark, and many like him have taken it upon themselves to pull in resources to help his neighbors who were devastated by the flood. I've known Kenny for a while know. He's one of those guys who would do anything for anybody...anytime.

            
Let your voice be heard

ESPECIALLY if you reside

in the State of Louisiana

Write to: 
Senator Jonathan Perry 
District Office
P.O. Box 100
Kaplan, LA 70548

District Phone  (337) 643-6425

Fax  (337) 643-6422

E-mail Address  perryj@legis.la.gov

ATTORNEY 

Republican State Senator Jonathan Perry  R-Kaplan  

see at 2:48 on the video

Lafayette, LA area 

who is working on a government mandate 

for you to have a 'permit'

BEFORE you can help ANYONE!!!!

 

Published on Aug 26, 2016

Obama Admin. Forced FBI to Stand Down & Stop Investigating Clinton Foundation

Sent: 8/24/2016 9:56:43 A.M. Pacific Daylight Time
Subj: Obama Admin. Forced FBI to Stand Down & Stop Investigating Clinton Foundation

 

Everything we've learned about the Clinton Foundation corruption was presented to Loretta Lynch and the DOJ and they told the FBI to stand down Obama Admin. Forced FBI to Stand Down &  Stop Investigating Clinton Foundation Fellow Conservative, When Hillary Clinton was Secretary of State, she met with two different categories of people: US/foreign government employees and private individuals working outside of government. Pretty common sense... The people she met with were either working for a government or not. All in all, Hillary met with 154 people who were not associated with any government entity. At least 85 of them - which is 55% - had donated to the Clinton Foundation. At least 40 of them donated at least $100,000 to the corrupt Clinton charity and at least 20 of them donated in excess of $1,000,000. When you factor in the foreign governments that donated to the Foundation and then got access to Clinton as Secretary of State, we are talking about hundreds of millions of dollars. That is how much it costs to influence US policy. As you remember, FBI Director James Comey was asked point-blank whether the FBI was investigating the Clinton Foundation. For the first time that day, James Comey clammed up and said he could neither confirm, nor deny, the existence of an investigation. We have since learned that the FBI did bring evidence of corruption forward and Loretta Lynch’s DOJ told the FBI to stand down. Unacceptable! FaxBlast Congress and demand they use every tool at their disposal to FORCE the appointment of a Special Prosecutor to investigate the Clinton Foundation! For goodness sake, this is corruption on top of corruption on top of corruption.  The FBI brought evidence of criminality to the DOJ and asked them to authorize a full ethics investigation.  They were told to stand down. There have been reports that the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York has decided to go rogue and defy Loretta Lynch by investigating the Clinton Foundation anyway. If these reports are true, then this attorney’s days are numbered…  There is no way that Lynch allows this to go forward. We will likely never find the ‘smoking gun’ of pay-for-play, quid pro quo corruption at Hillary Clinton’s State Department. Hillary Clinton deleted more emails than she turned over. But what we have is an abundance of evidence pointing to impropriety. Hillary Clinton signed an ethics agreement and swore to create a wall between the State Department and the Clinton Foundation.  We’ve now learned that “wall” was as porous as the Southern Border. We know for a FACT that the State Department left 148 voicemails on Cheryl Mills’ State Department answering machine. That’s just the times they played phone tag.  That doesn’t include all the times that Mills picked up and talked with them. We know for a FACT that the Clinton Foundation reached out to Hillary’s top aides by email insisting that top donors be given access to Clinton. And now we know for a FACT that the majority of non-government individuals who met with Secretary Clinton also happened [to be] Clinton Foundation donors. Hillary testified before Congress that she would not allow the Clinton Foundation to influence her work in government.  She signed an ethics agreement with the White House asserting the same.  She lied. Don’t let Loretta Lynch and the Obama administration cover up another Clinton crime! FaxBlast Congress and DEMAND the appointment of a Special Prosecutor!   Like always, the Clintons are claiming that what they did wasn’t technically illegal.  They may be right.  This is coming from the same political family that put a price tag on the Lincoln Bedroom in the White House and rented it out to top donors to sleep at the White House overnight. This is the same political family that was caught stealing $200k of furniture, china and artwork from the White House when they left. This is the Hillary Clinton who, in the words of the FBI Director, may have violated the Espionage Act, but there was insufficient evidence to prosecute.    Hillary Clinton violated the Federal Records Act – the law that mandates government employees preserve their documents – no less than 14,900 times.  But she can’t be prosecuted for that because only current government employees can be punished. Now, we have evidence that Hillary Clinton violated an ethics agreement she signed by allowing the Clinton Foundation and its donors to influence her work in government. Loretta Lynch, the Attorney General and long-time friend of the Clintons, told the FBI to stand down when they brought evidence of corruption forward. You need to get loud and DEMAND a Special Prosecutor right now! Send your FaxBlast to Congress here! We saw a huge swell of support yesterday in both the House and the Senate in support of a Special Prosecutor.  Even many within the Democrat party are calling for the Clinton Foundation to shut down over this. This is doable.  Congress has still yet to pass a number of government spending bills.  They have the power to force the appointment of a Special Prosecutor.  Congressman and House Freedom Caucus Chairman Jim Jordan (R-OH) - the same person who is forcing a vote to impeach Obama's IRS commissioner - is leading the charge to force the appointment of a special prosecutor.  But he can't do it alone. It is just up to YOU to convince Congress to push for a Special Prosecutor! Loretta Lynch’s DOJ told the FBI to stand down in its investigation of the Clinton Foundation! FaxBlast Congress and DEMAND the appointment of a Special Prosecutor by any means necessary! Sincerely, Joe Otto Conservative Daily There have been reports that the US Attorney for the Southern District of New York has decided to go rogue and defy Loretta Lynch by investigating the Clinton Foundation anyway.  If these reports are true, then this attorney’s days are numbered [Ed., pray for his safety and success in doing this.]...  There is no way that Lynch allows this to go forward. http://msgfocus.conservativedailyalerts.com/q/121dBCz2TJdhzAzrNAhG/wv

Pocket Constitution

Home › Pocket Constitution

 

• 
• 
• 
• 

Pocket Constitution

• 2⁰⁰
• Save $2⁹⁵

---

One Shipped To You - another shipped to Obama

One Shipped To You - another shipped to Obama - $2.00 USD Quantity

+-

---

No one should go anywhere without a copy of the Constitution in their pocket. There are a lot of liberals out there who have no idea how the country was designed to operate, and it is your DUTY to set them straight!

SPECIAL OFFER! Buy your own Pocket Constitution and we will send another hard copy straight to Barack H. Obama on your behalf, reminding him that he took an oath to defend the Constitution, not to shred it!

http://store.truthgear.net/products/pocket-constitution

http://store.truthgear.net/ 

 

Doctors Marking You For Red List

DOCTORS MARKING YOU FOR RED LIST!  WAKE UP FOLKS!  IT IS COMING SOON! HERE IS HOW TO FIGHT BACK

By Susan Duclos
All News PipeLine


When a new administration takes office all departments under federal control start reflecting the political and ideological agenda of the party in power.  That is to be expected, but one shouldn't expect, nor tolerate, that agenda being pushed in a relation between a doctor and their patients, a relationship that should be sacred and protected by ethics and patient confidentiality.

This article is in response to concerns expressed in our comment section about readers that are disturbed about their doctors and/or clinics asking them and their children if their household has firearms.

CWSK commented "Yesterday my wife took our oldest daughter to the doctor. The doctor asked her all kinds of questions and this is one of them. "Are there any firearms in your house?" Our daughter didn't know how to answer that question, so she just shrugged her shoulders. Then he asked my wife the same question, and she said "Yes".  I don't know what color list that put us on but I'm sure we are on one of them now.  Wake up folks it is coming soon."

Definitely the "red list," along with others the Obama administration and their merry band of liberals have labeled "dangerous," and "extremists," such as constitutionalists, Veterans, Christians, preppers, patriot groups and the alternative right.

PG responded "Yes, CWSK, the last time I went to our local health clinic I was handed a form to fill out and noticed that up in the left hand corner was the words "Dept.of Health And Human Services." I knew right away it wasn't info that my MD was requesting. The first page was info that was already on my medical records but when I got to the second page it asked " Do you ever feel depressed? Do you feel safe?"  is anyone threatening you? Do you own a gun?--- that's when I folded up the paper and put it in my purse. I noticed that there was an "opt out " section at the end where you could sign that you refused to answer the questions! That in itself was a red flag. Yep, if they want to know that info, let them go digging in state gun registries, because I'm not willingly supplying it."

While gun control supporters are quick to point out that some medical associations recommend treating gun violence as a "public health issue," claiming that it is an industry debate, not the pushing of Obama and liberals' gun control agenda, we note the NRA has addressed this issue previously and highlights the following:

Pursuant to the 2009 Obama "stimulus," patient records are now being digitized. Physicians are rewarded with up to $44,000 for adopting Electronic Medical Records (EMRS). If they do not adopt, they are penalized by reduced Medicare and Medicaid reimbursements. (American Recovery and Reinvestment Act of 2009, Pub. L. No. 111-5, § 4101, 123 Stat. 115; 42 U.S. Code § 300jj-11(c)(3)(A)(ii).)

That is a critical point because during the Obamacare debate, the NRA pushed a clause that, while not banning doctors from asking about firearm ownership, did forbid them from "documenting the information and using it for research purposes," also stating that the information "cannot be used to keep and maintain records of individuals’ firearm possession, nor can it be used to track ammunition."

Furthermore, the NRA reports "On Jan. 16, 2013, President Barack Obama issued a host of executive actions about gun control. Eight days later, the U.S. Department of Labor issued an FAQ about Obamacare implementation (dol.gov/ebsa/faqs/faq-aca11.html). Question five was, "Does PHS Act section 2717(c) restrict communications between health care professionals and their patients concerning firearms or ammunition?"

The Obama administration’s answer: "No. … The statute prohibits an organization operating a wellness or health promotion program from requiring the disclosure of information relating to certain information concerning firearms. However, nothing in this section prohibits or otherwise limits communication between health care professionals and their patients, including communications about firearms. Health care providers can play an important role in promoting gun safety."

In order to bypass that Obamacare clause the NRA made sure was inserted, the 'federal government' pushed for the Electronic Medical Records, rewarding doctors for adopting it and punishing those that would not use them.

Via Truth About Guns, October 2014:But that’s not what should give gun owners pause. It’s this: we have little idea what’s in those electronic records, who sees the data, where it goes, and what they do with it. While the debate over whether physicians should routinely question patients about firearm ownership is quiet for now, that does not mean that healthcare professionals cannot or would not be encouraged, with a wink and a nod, to record gun ownership information in an electronic health record as it emerges in the course of routine conversation with a patient.

[...]

The lack of transparency about the evolution of EMRs and EHRs has been appalling. Why is it that patients are encouraged to access primarily their PHR? Why can’t they easily see their EMR and EHR, despite the 'government’s' chest thumping over their Blue Button initiative? Even more to the point, why don’t I, as a citizen, have the right to see who has looked at my EHR data or the entities to which it has been sold or transmitted (in a de-identified manner, we are assured)? I can log on to my credit report any time and see who has requested it. Why can’t I do the same for my EHR and EMR? Why don’t I have the right to correct the records by removing information that is not medically relevant or opt-out of having my data shipped to federal agencies or academic institutions?

In other words, while Federal law prohibits the doctors from compiling information that has nothing to do with your medical health, such as gun ownership, in the Personal Health Records,  nothing stops them from using the Electronic Medical Record (EMR) or the Electronic Health Records (EHRs), which can be shared (just not with you, the patient!)........ we just don't know with who or what 'government' agencies. 
What is extremely concerning is that many adults, especially Second Amendment supporters, might very well tell a nurse, or a doctor it is none of their business and a question about firearms in their own homes has no place in a conversation between a doctor and a patient, but examples found across the web indicate they are abusing the fact that they are authortative figures by asking children these questions.

For example, on January 29, 2014, on Ol' Buffalo Blog, an image was shown with a note that stated "Read questions 11 and 12. This was a questionnaire at my daughter's cardiology appointment!!"
 

  Guns Save Lives also published a photo of part of a form that was associated with a physical to play sports given to their child in California.

In January 2013,  Rural Revolution published a copy of "Teen Questionnaire, 13 to 18 Years Old," they found in a comment section of a WND article titled "Homeschooler's Neighbor Sparks Social Services Case."

 

Related Must-Read - The Gun Question: Boundary Violations Go Digital


WHAT YOU CAN DO TO PROTECT YOURSELF?

One of the first things to do is make sure your child, if under 15, is not left alone with the doctor unless you know that particular medical professional does not unethically commit "boundary violations." If your child is older, have a discussion with him/her on what is and what is not appropriate for the doctor to be asking and what your child should or should not be answering.

If your doctor does violate those boundaries, find another doctor if at all possible... if not then the following steps are provided by Ammoland, steps to take after you politely, or not so politely, tell your doctor what he can do with his inappropriate questions and they incude the following:

2) If the gun question(s) appears on your health plan’s routine health assessment questionnaire, file a formal written complaint with the health plan. Every health plan has a member complaint process, often prescribed by law. Your complaint will be registered and the health plan will respond.

3) If the health plan responds with the excuse that their questions about your guns are standard medical practice that they must follow, you can take the complaint to the next step—file a written complaint with your state agency that regulates health plans. For example, in California you would follow the complaint procedure on the Department of Managed Health Care web site. It’s your right as a patient under California law.

4) If your doctor persists in asking intrusive questions about guns in your home, you can also file a complaint specifically against him or her with your health plan. Such complaints are taken seriously, and the doctor will be called to account for it. Having one or more complaints about ethical boundary violations on her record will make her think twice about doing it again.

5) Internet consumer rating sites have created another way doctors can be publicly rated on the basis of service, attitude, and behavior. Some commonly used rating sites are Yelp.com, Healthgrades.com, Vitals.com, and RateMDs.

6) Increasingly, doctors’ pay from Medicare and insurance companies is tied to how they score on patient satisfaction surveys. These are often sent randomly to patients, but you can request one to fill out. You can have a powerful impact on a doctor’s conduct by reporting the doctor’s unethical questioning about your guns.

7) If the doctor’s conduct is especially offensive, as was the case with this Florida pediatrician, you have the right to submit a complaint to the doctor’s licensing board. This is an agency in your state government that holds the ultimate power of licensure over your doctor. A quick internet search for “medical board” in your state should take you to the official form for filing a complaint. This is a step that should not be taken lightly.

Emphasis on number 6 is mine, because if doctors are going to sell out their patients by basically working as a government mole, for monetary rewards or simply to push their own political agenda, then it seems a type of ironic justice to hit them where it hurts, their wallets.

                          Medical Gestapo Asking About Guns, Transgender and More

Below is a commentary on this issue from a former cop and firearm instructor, including and example of when his doctor asked him about whether their were guns in the home.
 

Your Kid's Doctor Is Asking About YOUR Guns  

 

 http://allnewspipeline.com/Your_Doctor_Marking_You_For_Red_List.php