This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
AND
OTHER MEN OF THE ARMED SERVICES... THANKS FOR STOPPING THE EAST COAST
HAARP HURRICANE... WE HAVE JUST BEEN NOTIFIED THAT AN 81 YEAR OLD LADY
IN CALIFORNIA HAS WITNESSED THE LATEST ATTACK BY THE CHEMTRAIL BOYZ THAT
THE NEWEST BATCH OF CHEMTRAILS TURNED RED AFTER THEY DUMPED THEM OVER
HER HOUSE... THEN WE WERE NOTIFIED BY OTHERS THAT THEY ALSO WITNESSED
THE SAME. TWO DAYS LATER HER ROSES WERE DYING, AND OTHER PLANTS AS
WELL....
OUR
TEXAS SKY WENT FROM VIBRANT BLUE TO CRAPPOLA THIS A.M. IN LESS THAN 1
AND 1/2 HOURS.... PLEASE TELL THE U.N. TO GO PI$$ UP A ROPE AS WE THE
PEOPLE ARE FED UP, AND ARE NOW GIVING YOU ORDERS TO CEASE AND DESIST...
THE CHEMTRAIL PROGRAM... THE U.N. HAS TO GO BYE-BYE!!!!!
IF
YOU ARE NOT AWARE THERE ARE FOLKS WORKING TO STOP THIS ULTRA SHITTOLA
RIGHT NOW AND THEIR FEELINGS ARE YOU ARE EITHER WITH THE ENEMY OR AGAINST US.... THEY ARE GIVING OUR MILITARY ONE LAST CHANCE TO PROVE THEMSELVES IN REGARD AS TO WHICH SIDE THEY ARE ON....
TELL MARK WILLIAMS, YOUR AIR-FORCE GENERAL, TO GET WITH THE PICTURE OR THE PICK-UP CREW WILL BE KNOCKING SOON!!!!
P.S. THOSE GOLD FRINGE FLAGS NEED TO GO AS WE DO NOT BELONG TO LIZZY THE LIZARD....
P.S.S. THE CHEMTRAILS ARE A DECLARATION OF WAR AGAINST THE AMERICANS AND THE PEOPLE OF THE WORLD....
Maryland Doctor Who Treated Hillary Clinton For Blood Clot On Brain 'Mysteriously' Dies
A shocking new report circulating in the Kremlin today prepared by the Foreign Intelligence Service (SVR) says that the infamously named “Clinton Body Count” has now increased after a Maryland (US) based doctor was discovered dead this past week under mysterious circumstances—and who had, this past June, been part of a specialized medical team that removed a blood clot from the brain of Hillary Clinton.
This past summer, however, on 30 June SVR analysts state that Hillary Clinton collapsed on her private plane while in route to her Washington D.C. home and was unconscious when it landed at Joint Base Andrews—which is the home base of the 89th Airlift Wing that manages the flights of all top American officials, including the President.
Once landed, this report notes, Hillary Clinton was rushed by ambulance to the US Air Forces Malcolm Grow Medical Facility located on this base and put under the “urgent/immediate” care of doctors assigned to the 79th Medical Wing.
Though many aspects/details of this SVR report relating to what exactly happened when the unconscious Hillary Clinton reached the Malcolm Grow Medical Facility remain too highly classified to write about here, what is important to note is that her security guards refused to allow her to be treated, and when US Air Force doctors objected to removing her from their care, they had “numerous” weapons pointed at them—after which Hillary Clinton was taken from this medical facility by her just arrived motorcade.
Malcolm Grow Medical Facility at Joint Base Andrews (photo credit: Airman 1st Class Aaron Stout / U.S. Air Force)
Upon leaving Joint Base Andrews with the still unconscious Hillary Clinton, SVR intelligence analysts say her motorcade rushed to a nearby (57 kilometers/36 miles) private MedStar Montgomery Medical Center hospital in Olney, Maryland, where she was rushed into emergency surgery.
Attending Doctor Anaizi, in his operating on Hillary Clinton’s brain to remove the blood clot that had rendered her unconscious, was Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar who was the on-call anesthesiologist at MedStar Montgomery Medical Center—but who, exactly 3 months later on 30 September, was discovered dead.
Latest Clinton Body Count victim: Dr. Sandeep Sherlekar (1965-2016)
Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar was a deeply loved doctor by his patients who had been in practice for more than 20 years before his death, spoke multiple languages, and had previously served as the chief resident in anesthesiology at Hahnemann University Hospital in Philadelphia.
Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar was by all accounts deeply religious—and that led him in 2012 to file a lawsuit against the Chief Executive Officer, Muhammad Ahmad Khan, and Chief Financial Officer, Vic Wadhwa, accusing them of financial crimes at the medical practice where he worked called the American Spine Center.
SVR analysts note a “severe abnormality” in the events since CFO Vic Wadhwa pled guilty, due to Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar aiding the FBI, stating that as of yet he has not been sentenced for his crimes over two years later.
And in an even greater “strangulation/choking to death” of American justice, and immediately after Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar assisted Doctor Anaizi in his operating on Hillary Clinton’s brain, the same FBI agents he had helped in conviction of CFO Vic Wadhwa turned on him—and on 22 September filed charges against him accusing him of the same crimes he had reported to them in 2012.
With Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar being a devout adherent to the Hindu religion that considers suicide a murder and against the code of ahimsa (non-violence), SVR analysts say the local police reports suggesting this is why he died can be quickly discounted—with the more logical explanation of his death being simply that he knew more about Hillary Clinton then she was ever going to chance his telling anyone else.
These SVR intelligence analysts also note that Doctor Sandeep Sherlekar’s death fits exactly the profile of all of the other deaths associated with the Clinton Crime Family—with the victim fist “knowing too much”, then having “their personal and professional reputations destroyed”, with the final act being “their mysterious death” as a message for others to not dare cross these most dangerous of criminals.
To the American people knowing of these events this report doesn’t say, but from the past knowledge of these American’s known by just about everyone else in the world, even if they did, they wouldn’t care.
October 9, 2016 Sorcha Faal http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2135.htm
A failed state, a terrorist haven, four dead Americans – this is the Hillary Clinton record in Libya we know about.
But new evidence -- and a review of the public record -- reveals that Hillary Clinton’s actions in Libya were not just disastrous policy, but a violation of U.S. anti-terrorism law.
A recent report to the Foreign Affairs Committee of the British House of Commons concluded that Western intervention in Libya was based on "inaccurate intelligence" and "erroneous assumptions."
Advocates failed to recognize that “the threat to civilians was overstated and that the rebels included a significant Islamist element," and the failure to plan for a post-Qaddafi Libya led to the "growth of ISIL" in North Africa.
However, “inaccurate intelligence” doesn’t fully describe the whole story. A closer examination of the run-up to the Libya debacle on September 11, 2012 leads to the irrefutable conclusion that Secretary of State Hillary Clinton knowingly armed radical Islamist terrorists in Libya.
False pretenses
The American public was told that the intervention in Libya was necessary to prevent a humanitarian crisis. But just as Hillary Clinton would describe the attack on our Benghazi diplomats as a spontaneous protest over a video, the military intervention that led inexorably to the debacle in Benghazi was sold on false pretenses: to prevent an imminent massacre of civilians engaged in a pro-democracy uprising.
See the Fox News 2016 battleground prediction map and make your own election projections. See Predictions Map →
Hillary Clinton described the 2011 Arab Spring rebellion in eastern Libya as a spontaneous pro-democracy uprising, but the Libyan connection to radical Islamic extremist groups was well known long before 2011. The region where the rebellion began was a fervid recruiting ground for jihadis who killed American forces in Iraq and Afghanistan.
The leaders of the “civilian uprising” that Hillary Clinton supported were members of the Libyan Islamic Fighting Group (LIFG) who had pledged allegiance to Al Qaeda. They refused to take orders from non-Islamist commanders and assassinated the then leader of the rebel army, Abdel Fattah Younes.
The LIFG had been jailed under Qaddafi until hundreds of their members were released through a de-radicalization program. That program was spearheaded by an exiled Muslim Brotherhood affiliated Libyan cleric based in Qatar named Ali al-Sallabi. The jihadis pledged they would never use violence against Gaddafi again.
But nearly as soon as the LIFG was released they took up arms against the Qaddafi regime. Just as there was ample evidence that Hillary’s “pro-democracy protestors” were radical Islamists, there was no truth to the assertion a civilian massacre was imminent.
Libyan doctors told United Nations investigators that, of the more than 200 corpses in Tripoli’s morgues following fighting in late February 2011, only two were female. This indicates Qaddafi’s forces targeted male combatants and did not indiscriminately attack civilians. Nor had Qaddafi forces attacked civilians after retaking towns from the rebels in early February 2011.
While Muammar Qaddafi had a 40-year record of appalling human rights violations, his abuses did not include large-scale attacks on Libyan civilians. We restored full diplomatic relations with Qaddafi in 2007 and he was a key partner in counter-terrorism efforts.
LIFG and affiliated jihadis received at least 18 shipments of arms from Qatar with the blessing of the U.S., the Wall Street Journal reports. The arms shipments were funneled through none other than Ali al-Sallabi, the Qatar cleric who brokered their release from prison.
The Islamists were able to pay for the weapons because Clinton had convinced Obama to grant full diplomatic recognition to the rebels, against the advice of State Department lawyers and the Secretary of Defense. As the Washington Post reported, this move “allowed the Libyans access to billions of dollars from Qaddafi’s frozen accounts.”
These arms shipments are significant for several reasons. It led to the indictment of American arms dealer Marc Turi who was charged with selling weapons to Islamist militants in Libya through Qatar. The charges were dropped this week after Turi threatened to reveal emails showing Clinton had approved the sales. Here’s where it gets very sticky for Secretary Clinton.
The rebel leaders were on the State Department’s Foreign Terrorist Organization list. It is a direct violation of the law to provide material support for terrorist organizations under 18 U.S. Code 2339A & 2339B. Penalties for providing or attempting to provide material support to terrorism include imprisonment from 15 years to life.
Nor is the Qatar connection insignificant. Qatar has donated anywhere from $1 to $5 million to the Clinton Foundation, and emails reveal members of the Qatari royal family were privileged with back channel meetings with Secretary Clinton at the State Department.
While whipping up support for the Libya military campaign, Clinton told Arab leaders, “it’s important to me personally,” the Washington Post reported. Hillary Clinton’s prosecution of foreign policy in Libya crossed several lines: she showed extremely bad judgment by ignoring military and intelligence officials, she let personal interests conflict with U.S. foreign policy and, most importantly, she may have broken the law -- again.
Any one of these transgressions should disqualify her from holding any kind of leadership role in our government, let alone president of the United States. The last one qualifies Hillary Clinton for government housing, though not in the White House. Lt. General (Ret.) Michael T. Flynn spent 33 years as an intelligence officer. He served as the Director of the Defense Intelligence Agency and the Senior Military Intelligence Officer in the Department of Defense. He is the founder of the Flynn Intel Group, a Commercial, Government, and International consulting firm. He is the author of the forthcoming book, written with Michael Ledeen, of "The Field of Fight: How We Can Win the Global War Against Radical Islam and Its Allies" (St. Martin's Press, July 12, 2016).
Recently
I had an encounter with the Lord where He showed me an assignment of the enemy
that is about to be released into the body of Christ in the United States of
America regarding the US election that is about to take place in a little over
a month.
Before I share this encounter with you, I
want to state this and make it clear that since I felt the Lord speak of Donald
Trump in this encounter. Firstly I am
not releasing this word from any “political standpoint” of reviewing any
policies or agendas. I am simply releasing this word from an encounter that I
had with the Lord and felt a strong urgency to release it.
Secondly,
considering the video released yesterday from 2005, I want to say firstly that
the Lord DOES NOT condone sin, and by releasing this encounter I am not
condoning Donald’s past actions, but felt an urgency to publish this encounter as a
warning to the body of Christ.
As
I pondered this encounter in light of yesterday’s video, I felt a stirring from
the Lord to not focus on the past but what God is saying TODAY in THIS SEASON
right now.
I
was standing in what looked like a “commission room” in hell and so much
darkness around. I
saw the enemy and he was about to release a horde of demons upon the earth into
the United States with a specific target against believers. What I noticed about these demonic spirits
was that they had blindfolds in their hands and they were ready to “move”. I asked Jesus what these
demonic spirits were and he said that they were “spirits of deception”.
I
then heard... “My
people that are not pressing in for discernment, to hear My heart concerning
the US election and who I have anointed for the next Presidential Term, will be
brought to a place right now in this season where they will be blinded by
deception.
This army that is about to be released into the body of Christ in
the USA are coming to blind people to the truth that I have anointed Donald
Trump and Mike Pence and the people of God need to hear this so that they keep
pressing in for discernment despite what the media and the ‘natural world’
says.
Things are going to continue to escalate and pressure intensify to push
Donald Trump out, but My people need to take their place and stand with Me to
see My purposes come to fruition."
The
sense surrounded me that this is a very strategic moment, a time of urgency and
a time to pray even more fervently. The sense of ‘laying down agenda(s) and
simply seeking the heart of God for this new season for the nation of America
that is approaching.
I
felt this reminder from the Lord to His people in the USA to be praying for discernment
right now and to lift their eyes up higher. Place not your eyes on ‘media’ or
the ‘natural’ but really continue seeking His heart. I felt such a strong sense
of an ‘increase in onslaught’ in this US election in this “last leg”, and God’s
people are going to need eyes to see and ears to hear what the Spirit is saying
more than ever before.
As
I have sat with the Lord on this word, I have felt the Lord’s heart for His
people to not get “caught up” in what is going on in the “natural”.
The
very heart of this word ultimately was I felt a call from the Lord for His
people to “come up higher”, to not be bound up by what is being reported or
what is not being reported. The fate of a nation does not hang on MAN. It’s in the hand of the Lord and the ONUS is
on the Church right now.
I
believe Jesus is calling His people in light of everything going on in this
messy situation in the USA with Clinton and Trump to seek His heart above ALL
ELSE.
Put
your hope in Jesus. To cry out for the Lord to bring a cleansing and a turning
in this nation. To really individually continue to seek out the heart of God
and ask the Spirit of God to give eye salve so there may be clear spiritual
sight regarding this election and the destiny of the USA.
“Also
buy white garments from me so you will not be shamed by your nakedness, and
ointment for your eyes so you will be able to see” ~ Revelation 3:18
This
is not just about Donald Trump/Mike Pence.
This is about the destiny and the fate of the United States of America.
The Lord sees BEYOND today, and it’s time to really seek His heart and His
ways.
This
is really a time of repentance for America and calling forth the plans and
purposes of God in the nation and a surrendering of agendas to align with His
ways, even when we don’t understand.
It’s time to stand in the gap more than
ever before for a move of God in the nation. I felt that this is a very
strategic moment right now, the fate and destiny of the nation hangs in the
balance.
YOU SHOULD BE OUTRAGED!!!ONCE YOU LEARN THE TRUTH, IT IS TIME TO DISPOSE OF THE PROBLEMS AND THOSE WHO ARE CAUSING THEM, including the UNITED NATIONS!!!!
TELLING ON THEMSELVES: 'RURAL CLEANSING' IN IDAHO AND MONTANA (AND ALL STATES)
America: What we have been led to believe is our rightful 'government' WAS AND IS NOT!The rightful government was overridden by a COUP, and since at least 1933 our nation has been deceived into believing that the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION was our government.IT IS NOT.Read below and realize only a small part of what the deception has been and continues to do to subjugate our rights to land ownership and use, and all being done by corporations under the main criminal UNITED STATES OF AMERICA CORPORATION in Washington, DC and all with the help of the Governors of the individual State corporations.
I just love it when someone slips up and tells us country folk what’s really being planned for us.
'Rural cleansing' is the purposeful removal of rural citizens from the countryside and the relocation of rural populations into urban areas. Many public officials and media pundits scoff at the mere suggestion that rural cleansing is taking place, but the problem, you see, is that there are people who have inadvertently left tell-tale clues we can use to piece together things for ourselves.
One of the most startling clues I’ve run across lately comes from a July 1, 1998 newspaper article in The Montanian, which is published in Libby, a tiny rural town in Northwest Montana.
Did She Just Say That?
In the article, Libby County Commissioner, Rita Windom, informs us that she and other commissioners were approached by Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks (FWP) state land manager, Darlene Edge, with a proposal to cooperate in driving rural residents out of the Montana countryside into cities. When commissioners responded with horror, Windom says Edge replied:
“Can’t you see we are doing you a favor by forcing people to move from rural areas into the urban areas. That way you can close roads…Why don’t you work with us and move these people out of the rural areas and into the urban areas so cities can shoulder more of the responsibilities and the county can save money?”
This exchange took place in a meeting regarding a document called The Wildlife Program Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement (EIS), of which only 300 were published. According to Windom, there was very little public input because the few public meetings held were so poorly advertised.
But was this just an isolated, though shocking, incident? Did this public policy only affect Montana? I don’t think so. I’ll tell you why.
Sometime around 1997 I called a Boundary County, Idaho resident from Washington State regarding possible job openings in my field in Boundary County. Her answer was that the woods had been shut down and 300 families had left. She continued on to tell me she had seen a public land management agency document outlining a plan to empty North Idaho of people and turn the entire area into a wildlife corridor. Naturally, she was outraged.
About ten years later, another reliable eyewitness told me that the same document had arrived at his home first. The document was marked "Not for public view." He had purchased a house that had previously been occupied by a public land management agency employee who had moved. My source had opened the document and read it. He confirmed that it said what my other friend had previously described to me. In fact, he had lent her the document, which is how she happened to know what was in it.
I was never able to get my hands on that document, but when someone sent me a camera shot of the above article in The Montanian describing much the same policy being announced at much the same time as the eyewitness accounts, I wasted no time in getting a copy of the article.
Other evidence for believing that this article in The Montanian represents policies that affect Idaho, as well as Montana, is that not too long ago, at a U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service public meeting about listing the wolverine on the Endangered Species list, we were told that Idaho and Montana are now considered to be in the same management region by the U.S. Forest Service and U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service. The land and wildlife management policies are pretty much the same now. This is why huge blocks of land, taking in N.W. Montana, Northern Idaho and N.E. Washington, are included in management plans for grizzly habitat, caribou habitat, wildlife corridors, etc.
Where Did 'Rural Cleansing' Come From?
Commissioner Windom remarks in the Montanian article that the Draft EIS that had upset her and other commissioners was the product of five to six years’ labor by the FWP. That puts us back to around 1992, or a year later, when the Rio Earth Summit trotted out the document, Agenda 21: the Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet, and other supporting documents, for our enjoyment.
Documents and resolutions introduced at the Rio Earth Summit had been in the works for years before being introduced to the world.
Policies leading to rural cleansing are found in the document, Agenda 21: the Earth Summit Strategy to Save Our Planet, but another important source is associated with one of the other documents introduced at Rio. That was the Convention on Biological Diversity. It has been shown that the Wildlands Project is the central mechanism by which the Convention on Biological Diversity is to be implemented. The Wildlands Project calls for humans to be removed from one-half of the American land mass, and to create uninhabited corridors for wildlife to move freely from Alaska to Yellowstone Park, or farther south. It was written by radical environmentalists working in United Nations nongovernmental organizations with the full knowledge and aid of U.S. federal agencies such as U.S. Forest Service, BLM, U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service, EPA and others.
It appears that the Wildlands Project is now being implemented under another name in Idaho and the West through the Western Governors Association’s Wildlife Corridors Initiative (WCI).To learn more about that, please see my blog, Infiltration of LittleTown U.S.A.: The Wildlands Project and Agenda 21 in Idaho. Particularly, pay attention to the section subtitled “Nudging Us into the Cities.”
If we are paying attention, we can catch public officials and media pundits additionally telling on themselves by their perpetual use of disinformation. One common bit of disinformation used to mislead the public is the repeated statement that Agenda 21 is an outdated and nonbinding document. You can always tell a trained operative when statements similar to this come out of their mouth.
Just two to three weeks ago, I submitted a comment on the above article. I commented that Agenda 21 is no outdated or irrelevant document, because in 2012, the United Nations held another summit called Rio+20, in which the members reaffirmed Agenda 21 as the working document for the 21st century. They also reaffirmed their commitment to the Convention on Biological Diversity. The webmaster declined to publish my comment.
“Rio+20 (2012) Main article: United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development In 2012, at the United Nations Conference on Sustainable Development the attending members reaffirmed their commitment to Agenda 21 in their outcome document called “The Future We Want”. 180 leaders from nations participated.”
Bringing it Home
When the Wikipedia entry calls the Agenda 21 document a voluntary and nonbinding action plan, the writer fails to outline the process whereby former President Clinton issued an executive order and created the President’s Council on Sustainable Development (PCSD), which then formed policies and plans to implement Agenda 21 under soft law. 'Sustainable Development' is the term used at United Nations and national levels to describe the goals of Agenda 21.
Federal grants, monies, and other inducements have drawn local and state governments into that implementation. I’m sure many of those public officials were ignorant of the consequences of accepting those grants at the time. Some are either still ignorant or too stubborn, or maybe even too complicit, to admit that they were duped. When soft law becomes the new normal, it can be upheld by case law. These practices are also now being codified in piecemeal legislation, comprehensive land use plans and zoning regulations.
There You Go Again
Now you will be told that county comprehensive land use plans, likewise, are nonbinding documents with no real clout. Oops—wrong again. For example,the U.S. Forest Service uses comprehensive land use plans when writing forest plans for your region. If your plan just happens to agree with their goals (and what are their goals? why, Sustainable Forestry, of course) the plan serves as cover for their management policies, because the Forest Service claims that they have coordinated with your county, as required by law, by having read and taken under consideration your comprehensive land use plan.
Video record of December 22, 2014 meeting in St. Maries Idaho between Forest Service and Benewah County Commissioners and Benewah County Natural Resource Team also attended by local, state, and federal government representatives, and members of the public and press. The goal of the meeting with the USFS Region 1 Forester, Faye Kruger, and IPNF Forest Supervisor, Mary Farnsworth, to determine and ensure that the US Forest Service complied with federal statutes and planning rules in developing the IPNF Forest Plan, and how the Forest Planners failed to coordinate as required with Benewah County Natural Resource land use plan. Benewah County brings to light how the USFS has failed to comply with the laws and ignored the economic situation facing western rural forested communities. The USFS callous arrogance is readily apparent as the USFS continues to endanger the Health, Safety and Welfare and impoverishing the western rural communities through mismanagement of the forested lands through bad planning and bad science, creating a serious threat to humans, critical community watersheds, wildlife and the environment.
and hear F.S. employees state this over and over again, as they are being questioned regarding their latest forest plan for Idaho. I have also read that comprehensive land use plans can be used as a basis for zoning regulations and other county ordinances. This is why various groups want to embed statements that are conducive to Sustainable Development in your county comprehensive land use plans.
Though the disinformation campaign strategy in Idaho is still one of denial and Alinsky-like mockery of Agenda 21 conspiracy theorists, as exemplified in this Spokesman-Review article, the strategy is now shifting elsewhere. Rosa Koire, speaking of California, describes howthe charge of conspiracy theory is there giving way to the position that Agenda 21, and its related documents and policies, are real, but that these policies are the only feasible and just way of coping with global problems such as climate change, overpopulation, poverty and environmental degradation.
It’s the 'New Normal'. Just Accept it!
It’s no surprise, then, that FOX News just published an article entitled Foundations plan to pay news media to cover radical UN agenda. The article describes how a cadre of journalists is being trained to win the public over to U.N. Sustainable Development policies.
Comic Relief
That’s why I just chortle when I find articles like this one from The Montanian containing past candid (though Kafkaesque) quotes from officials who hadn’t yet sufficiently learned to dissemble. I hope you will read the entire article, as it has additional interesting comments about the changing use of conservation easements and the way Montana Fish, Wildlife and Parks was circumventing the public and county commissioners to get its way. The article is reprinted by the gracious permission of The Montanian Newspaper.
And just so we can do a little mocking of our own, let me refer you to this funny, short short video called
But, then again, after having a good chuckle, let’s move past the mockery and get down to the debate – if we can get one. If journalists are going to try to convince us that 'Sustainable Development', as envisioned by members and advisory groups to the United Nations, is the best path for America, we need to be ready to engage in a logical and reasonable discussion. And that will be a serious conversation, indeed.
The Montanian. “FWP plans big changes in hunting and rural living.” Libby, Montana: July 1, 1998
Sorry, the print on the first page is small. After posting this, I realized I had made a transcription of the first page of this article. If you scroll down, past the header front page at the bottom, you will see page 1 transcribed. Page 2 is large enough to read easily. When I got this article from microfiche, the greater amount of print on page one inhibited our ability to make the print larger and, thus, more readable.
Montanian July 1, 1998 (TRANSCRIPTION Page 1)
FWP plans big changes in hunting and rural living
Social Engineering is in the Works
The Montana Department of Fish, Wildlife and Parks has big changes planned for the way it manages wildlife, hunting and rural living patterns. And even though the proposed changes could impact hunters, property owners and anyone who enjoys the outdoors, most Montanians are unaware of the changes.
Lincoln County Commissioner, Rita Windom, says she has only recently learned about the plan, entitled “Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.”
“This is a document that should mean something to everybody,” Windom said Monday, June 29. “They only printed 300 copies of this document, and they only printed 250 of the actual EIS (Environmental Impact Statement). They had seven meetings in the state of Montana and I happened to get a hold of [it, because of] a meeting I had gone to back in 1992.”
Windom said the plan outlines big changes. “We were just horrified because it changes the way lands are managed and…it dramatically (effects) counties,” she said.
“This document is called “The Wildlife Program Draft Programmatic Environmental Impact Statement.” The Montana Fish Wildlife and Parks prepared it. They’ve been working on it for five or six years at a cost of $600,000,” she said.
“There are five alternatives and they don’t list the preferred ones, which is unusual.” Windom said she is concerned about the lack of public input into what are potentially major changes.
“One of the scary things about this document is that…the public input doesn’t go to the game commission for review (and) it doesn’t go to the people. Pat Graham, Director of Fish, Wildlife and Parks, is the decision maker. He gets to select which alternatives or a combination thereof.
“[The plan] allows some public comments…at meetings. [But] they were so ill advertised. They had the biggest one in Libby, which was the one we demanded, and we only had nine people. The meeting was May 26.”
Windom says the plan would allow FWP to sell more non-resident hunting licenses while reducing the number of licenses available for Montana residents. “They are going to ask the Legislature to change the way they do hunting licenses. They want to allow more non-resident licenses in their formula for licenses. The way I understand it is that there will be fewer for resident hunters,” she said.
Worse, the non-resident licenses will be sold to the highest bidder. “It will be all market-based, highest bidder. We think that is pretty unfair,” she said.
Windom says the plan goes way beyond the management of just wildlife. It also includes plans to manipulate human population in rural areas.“They are saying they want social changes. They talk about the increasing importance of environmental concerns nationally, and the increasing reliance on referendums and grass-roots politics for political change. They [FWP] say that social and economic values towards natural resources are becoming less consumptive…nationally. The emergence of the animal rights movement exemplifies national pressure to shift to a less consumptive use at state and local levels,” Windom said, citing the plan.
Windom said she is disturbed that FWP is allowing national trends to dictate its policy. “What is the reasoning behind allowing an animal rights movement to dictate policy on how we use Montana lands?”
Windom read aloud from Alternative 3 of the plan: “Land owners would increase, through expanded access, incentives and habitat programs. Local governments would benefit from expanded payments including those in lieu of personal property tax.” That means to me, currently we have conservation easements and they pay personal property tax on buildings, farm equipment and livestock. They they pay a payment in lieu of taxes on real estate, very small…. [FWP] is going to change the use of the land and take the personal property off the land on conservation easements, which would mean ranchers and farmers could no longer use the land the way it is currently being used. That is a big departure in the way we have known conservation easements in the past,” Windom said.
Windom said the plan would in essence tax rural property owners for the wildlife on their property. “This is even more scary. Local governments would benefit from expanded payments, including those in lieu of personal property tax, however new initiatives pertaining to wildlife on the urban interface may [a]ffect some local residents through tax assessments, meaning that those who choose to live in the countryside would have to pay a tax to Fish, Wildlife and Parks so they could manage more effectively the wildlife there.”
Windom said one FWP employee told her the plan is designed to push rural residents into urban areas. “When I was in Thompson Chain of Lakes meeting, Darlene Edge (FWP state lands manager) told me she didn’t understand the attitude of county commissioners. She said, “You are so reluctant to work with us on these issues…can’t you see we are doing you a favor by forcing people to move from the rural areas into the urban areas. That way you can close roads…you know your timber receipts are declining. You are going to have less money to work with. Why don’t you work with us and move these people out of the rural areas and into the urban areas so cities can shoulder more of the responsibilities and the county can save money,” Windom said.
“He said the general public knew about this before the game commission,” Windom said. “The game commission really doesn’t get any input in it.”
Windom said FWP is working to circumvent negative public opinion of the plan in at least one area.“We had a situation up in the West Kootenai some months ago where they [FWP] came up and wanted to do a conservation easement, and the people were…
*Read the rest of the article on page 2 above
37 Responses to Telling On Themselves: Rural Cleansing in Idaho and Montana
Read at bottom of article at : http://www.thedailyherb.com/telling-on-themselves-rural-cleansing-in-north-idaho-and-montana/
America, do not make the mistake of thinking that these serious issues do not affect you because you live in the 'city.' THIS DOES AFFECT YOU! And the plans included for you city slickers will shock you! Don't take this situation lightly. In fact don't ignore this at all. If you are not already well informed about Agenda 21, also called Agenda 2030, and the serious ramifications for everyone in this nation, do your homework and go to work protesting the various illegal 'government departments' that are working for the United Nations One World Government and its plans for worldwide genocide, to take place in our nation as is already occurring in others.
U.S. presidential election chaos exposes flawed political system. China mocks United States elections.
As the presidential candidates of the Democratic and Republican parties begin the last sprint toward the general election, U.S. citizens are becoming more and more frustrated by the political campaign.
WikiLeaks recently promised “significant” disclosures on the U.S. election, war, arms and oil in the coming weeks. It is widely believed that these revelations will add more flames to the already chaotic political show.
Scandals have dogged the two main candidates throughout the 2016 election, which has further increased dissatisfaction among U.S. citizens. According to a recent Gallup poll, 60 percent of registered voters view Donald Trump as the least favorable candidates in 25 years, and Hillary Clinton as the second least favorable.
The tax-related questions for Trump, as well as worries over Clinton’s health and her use of a private email server, have all led to the current state of the election. In their first presidential debate, the two candidates focused more on personal attacks than policies. The Times commented in an editorial that the candidates have neglected the widening gap between the American dream and social reality.
A recent survey showed that voters now perceive the government and congress as the biggest problems needing to be addressed in American society. These concerns come ahead of issues like the economy, employment and immigration. Of course, that doesn’t mean voters don’t care about economic and social issues, but it does show the great and growing concerns that U.S. citizens have about their political system.
Despite protests against money-oriented politics and election scandals, Trump still plans to drop another $140 million on campaign ads. Anticipated to cost as much as $5 billion, most of which comes from special interest groups, the 2016 election is likely to be the most expensive one in history.
People are very clear about the sour fruits of money-oriented politics, and the new U.S. president is unlikely to end political confrontation or even do much to ease discontent toward the government. As British economist Martin Wolf said, growing inequality and slowing productivity have made democracy intolerant and capitalism illegitimate.
For a long time, the U.S. has boasted that its lively election is a sign of its system’s superiority. However, the essential purpose of the election is to provide a driving force for development. The most important task for presidential nominees is not to win the election, but to eventually govern the country.
It's time for the U.S. to take a close, honest look at its arrogant democracy and flawed politics.
Flint, Michigan, is known for one thing these days - lead poisoning.
In 2014 Flint began drawing its drinking water
from the local Flint River while they waited to connect to a regional
water source. Residents began complaining about the water quality, and
in 2015, it was discovered that some children in Flint had increased
levels of lead in their blood. The Flint River water apparently had
elevated lead levels and the children had ingested it.
It was all over from that point, for we all know that lead poisoning is very serious, as it affects brain function, etc.
Now, the residents of Flint have another health problem - and this
time it's real. I'll explain the second half of that sentence in a bit.
It seems that the people of Flint have been sufficiently frightened
to death by the lead scare to the point that they are afraid to bathe or
shower in the "contaminated" water. They are instead using baby wipes to
clean themselves. The wipes are evidently not getting the job done.
Because of this lack of basic hygiene, 53 Flint residents, so far, have
been infected with Shigellosis, which causes bloody diarrhea, fever, and
nausea. There are a total of 84 victims of this highly infectious
disease throughout the surrounding Genesee County.
So the government first deemed that Flint's water was unsafe, due to
high levels of lead contamination. It then provided the baby wipes to
residents, in place of bathing and general hygiene. Because the
government provided the wipes, the residents naturally assumed that they
would be an adequate substitute for a real shower. Obviously, the
government was and is wrong, which brings me back to the original lead
scare.
As it turns out, the Chicken Littles in government neglected their
own EPA and CDC, which long ago deemed that bathing and showering in low
lead contaminated water is safe, as skin does not absorb lead.
In other words, the people of Flint and Genesee County could have
spared themselves the crippling and drug-resistant Shigellosis disease
if not for the hysteria surrounding the original incident.
Regarding the original lead scare, it turns out to be just that. As
happens more often than not these days, real science seems to be
consistently pushed aside in favor of hysteria and junk science.
The hysteria over lead can be traced back to a single source. Much
like the myths that salt kills, and others, the lead myth, too, comes
out of the 1970s. It was a good decade for junk science.
The children of Flint were tested and some had blood lead levels
(BLL) exceeding 5 micrograms per deciliter. Remember this number.
The man who originated the lead scare was Herbert Needleman, a
University of Pittsburgh professor. He testified before Congress in 1979
that he had done a study and found that low levels of lead harmed
children's intelligence and adversely affected their behavior.
The EPA back then wasn't completely co-opted by the left and rejected his claim stating that,
"the Committee concludes that the study results, as reported in the
Needleman paper, neither support nor refute the hypothesis that low or
moderate levels of [lead] exposure lead to cognitive or other behavioral
impairments in children."
A full investigation into Needleman's findings by his University
found that, "… it is doubtful whether [Needleman’s study] represents a
fair and accurate ascertainment of the relationship between IQ and [lead
levels]."
Even the New England Journal of Medicine weighed in stating that
Needleman's work showed a "pattern of errors, omissions, contradictions
and incomplete information."
The University of Pittsburgh eventually ruled that Needleman engaged
in "deliberate misrepresentation" and "substandard science."
Coincidentally, the CDC did a study of lead levels in children ages
1-5 years in three different eras. From 1976 to 1980, they found that
88.2% of children studied had BLL of 10µg/dL or more, with an average of
15 - three times the accepted level today. 1991-1994 the levels went
down to 4.4%, and by 2002 it had dropped to 1.6% of children with levels
exceeding 10µg/dL.
Almost 90% of the children of the 70s, by today's standards, should be brain damaged. But they are not. And why?
Because low levels of lead are not as dangerous as were being told by
the junk science hysteria crowd. It's frankly getting to the point
where we can't believe anything these so-called experts claim.
Meanwhile, the public remains at the mercy of these quack scientists
and the government which funds them. To me, this is just another means
of control wielded by the progressive left, and the people of Flint and
others are paying the price.
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
