By Anna Von Reitz
Public Notice Provided to All Federal Employees
and Agency Personnel Including IRS/Internal Revenue Service and Treasury
Personnel:
Social Security Numbers can only be
issued to federal "employees" / "citizens" for use only in
the performance of their official duties. See 20 CFR §422.104. SSN’s used as TIN’s apply to the same
Persons/PERSONS.
That is, only federal Persons (Territorials) or PERSONS
(Municipals) can be issued Social Security Account Numbers/TIN’s and that is
the way it has always been, except…….
FDR and the Federal WWII Era Congress got around this and included
millions of patriotic Americans by conscripting “volunteers” who agreed to pay
federal income taxes as a “Victory Tax”. They did this by arbitrarily defining such
voluntary taxpayers as Withholding Agents--- Warrant Officers in the Merchant
Marines.
The Victory Tax was supposed to sunset upon the “cessation of
hostilities”, however, in September of 1945, Congress conveniently forgot to
put a specific end date on this arrangement and the Internal Revenue Service
continued to collect –thus changing this from a voluntary arrangement to help
win the war-- to an international extortion racket.
This is your reminder that the Second World War hostilities ended
in September of 1945.
Any American “volunteer” who isn’t actually and naturally eligible
for Social Security and who wishes to “retire” from the presumption of federal
service and who revokes their election to pay federal taxes must be immediately set free and permanently released
from any obligation to report, to pay, or accept responsibility for any federal
Person/PERSON, and cannot otherwise be encumbered, imposed upon, or subjected
by any agency or department of the federal territorial or municipal government
(s).
Compulsory “citizenship” does not exist.
Those who have “retired” after becoming vested in the Social
Security System as a result of this abuse are owed all their money back and/or
all services promised at the time of their enrollment with no presumption of
continued federal citizenship or its obligations attaching to them.
The continued issuance of Social Security Numbers to people who
aren’t actually federal employees and either United States Citizens or citizens
of the United States is illegal entrapment under conditions of non-disclosure
and deceit; it results in mischaracterization of political status, involuntary
servitude, identity theft, unlawful
conversion of assets and other evils of racketeering committed against Americans
who have been deliberately misinformed and told that they have to enroll in
Social Security as a requirement of having a job----any job.
Enrollment in Social Security is only required if they happen to be
seeking direct employment with the federal government or are otherwise legitimately
considered federal government dependents—verifiable political asylum seekers,
etc.
Those born in one of the actual states of the Union who retire
from such employment, including military employment, or who, owing no natural
allegiance to the Territorial or Municipal governments, and having never been
employed by the federal government(s), simply realize these facts and revoke
their “election” to pay federal income taxes and cease thereafter to function
as voluntary Withholding Agents must be set free from the presumption of any further
territorial or municipal obligation.
A similar entrapment occurs when American State Citizens are encouraged
to vote in federal and federated state/county elections. When they “register” to vote, they unknowingly
give up their rights as stockholders and electors --- an undisclosed loss ---
and they become “enfranchised” as presumed operators of federal corporation
franchises. This sleight-of-hand
conversion of Americans from electors into mere voters again serves to
mischaracterize them and defraud them and subject them and deprive them of
their natural birth right and material interests at the hands of people who are
in fact their employees.
As none of these losses and obligations are ever fully disclosed
no valid private contract can be alleged and any American who subsequently rescinds
a voter registration must be removed from all registration data bases and held
harmless from any presumption of federal enfranchisement.
Let’s just use this one small example of the Big Lie federal
employees have been told and that they have been enforcing upon others…..continuing
from (1) quoting from Christopher Chapman now:
Ҥ 422.104. Who can be assigned a social security number.
(a) Persons eligible for SSN assignment. We can assign
you a social security number if you meet the evidence requirements in § 422.107
and you are:
(1) A United States citizen; or
(2) An alien lawfully admitted to the United States….
Let’s examine the definition of United States (U.S.) used in Title
26 to see if average Americans who are not employed by the federal government
are a citizens of the U.S…..
In most statutes (statute law) the Unites States referred to is
federal territory, just as it is in Title 26---- i.e.:
26 U.S. Code § 7701 - Definitions
(9) United States
The term “United States” when used in a geographical sense
includes only the States and the District of Columbia.
(10) State ----The term “State” shall be construed to include the
District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out
provisions of this title.
The term “State” exposes the truth that term “United States” means
the District of Columbia and no other.
Let us review, specifically the history of the evolution of this
term
The code of Federal Regulation is very definitive by using the
word “its”, in lieu of, “their”
Title 26 CFR § 1.1-1(a)(1) provides, in pertinent part:
(1) Section 1 of the [Internal Revenue] Code imposes an income tax
on the income of every individual who is a citizen or resident of the United
States ....
(c) Who is a citizen. Every person born or naturalized in the
United States and subject and subject to its [District
of Columbia] jurisdiction is a citizen.
The 1939 Code through 1954 the definition of “State”:
IRC 1954:
Alaska is a U.S. Territory
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be
construed to include the Territories and the District of Colombia, where such
construction is necessary to carry out the provisions of this title.
Alaska joins the Union, strikeout “Territories” and
substitute “Territory of Hawaii”:
Revision 1:
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a U.S. Territory
7701 (a) (10): The
term “State” shall be construed to include the Territory of Hawaii and the
District of Colombia, where such construction is necessary to carry out the
provisions of this title.
Hawaii joins the Union, strikeout “the Territory of Hawaii and”
immediately after the word “include”:
Revision 2
Alaska is a State of the Union
Hawaii is a State of the Union
· 7701 (a) (10): The term “State” shall be construed to include the
District of Columbia, where such construction is necessary to carry out
provisions of this title.
Notice how Alaska and Hawaii only fit these definitions of
[Territorial] “State” before
they were declared to be States of the United States of America, and now are
hereby admitted into the Union on equal footing with the original States, in
all respects whatsoever.[emphasis added]
Let’s examine some court cases that further solidifies this
subject:
A citizen of any one of the States of the union, is held to be,
and called a citizen of the United States, although technically and
abstractly there is no such thing. To conceive a citizen of the
United States who is not a citizen of some one of the States, is totally
foreign to the idea, and inconsistent with the proper construction and common
understanding of the expression as used in the Constitution, which must be
deduced from its various other provisions. The object then to be
attained, by the exercise of the power of naturalization, was to make
citizens of the respective States. [Ex Parte Knowles,
5 Cal. 300 (1855)] [bold emphasis added]
It is true, every person, and every class and description of
persons, who were at the time of the adoption of the Constitution recognized
as citizens in the several States, became also citizens of this new
political body; but none other; it was formed by them, and for them and their
posterity, but for no one else. And the personal rights and privileges
guarantied [sic] to citizens of this new sovereignty were intended to
embrace those only who were then members of the several
state communities, or who should afterwards, by birthright or otherwise,
become members, according to the provisions of the Constitution and
the principles on which it was founded. [Dred Scott v. Sandford, 19 How.
393, 404 (1856)] [emphasis added]
... [F]or it is certain, that in the sense in which the word
"Citizen" is used in the federal Constitution, "Citizen of each
State," and "Citizen of the United States***," are convertible
terms; they mean the same thing; for "the Citizens of each State are
entitled to all Privileges and Immunities of Citizens in the several
States," and "Citizens of the United States***" are, of course,
Citizens of all the United States***. [44 Maine 518 (1859), Hathaway, J.
dissenting][italics in original, underlines & C's added]
As it was the adoption of the Constitution by the
Conventions of nine States that established and created the United States***,
it is obvious there could not then have existed any person who had been
seven years a citizen of the United States***, or who possessed the
Presidential qualifications of being thirty-five years of age, a natural born
citizen, and fourteen years a resident of the United States***. The
United States*** in these provisions, means the States united. To
be twenty-five years of age, and for seven years to have been a citizen
of one of the States which
ratifies the Constitution, is the qualification of a representative. To be a
natural borncitizen of one of the States which
shall ratify the Constitution, or to be a citizen of one of said States at
the time of such ratification, and to have attained the age of thirty-five
years, and to have been fourteen years a resident within one of the said States,
are the Presidential qualifications, according to the true meaning of the Constitution. [People v. De La Guerra, 40 Cal. 311, 337
(1870)] [bold and underline emphasis added]
It is quite clear, then, that there is a citizenship of the United
States** and a citizenship of a State, which are distinct from each other and
which depend upon different characteristics or circumstances in the
individual. [Slaughter House Cases,
83 U.S. 36] [(1873) emphasis added]
The
first clause of the fourteenth
amendment made negroes citizens of the
United States**, and citizens of the State in which they reside, and thereby
created two classes of citizens, one
of the United States** and the other of the state. [Cory et al. v.
Carter, 48 Ind. 327][(1874) headnote 8, emphasis added]
We have in our political system a Government of the United
States** and a government of each of the several States.Each one of these governments is distinct from the others, and each has
citizens of its own ....[U.S. v. Cruikshank,
92 U.S. 542] [(1875) emphasis added]
One
may be a citizen of a State and yet not a citizen of the United States. Thomasson
v. State, 15 Ind. 449; Cory v. Carter, 48 Ind. 327 (17 Am. R.
738); McCarthy v. Froelke, 63 Ind. 507; In Re Wehlitz,
16 Wis. 443. [McDonel v. State, 90 Ind. 320, 323][(1883) underlines
added]
A
person who is a citizen of the United States** is necessarily a citizen of the
particular state in which he resides. But a person may be a citizen of
a particular state and not a citizen of the United States**. To hold otherwise
would be to deny to the state the highest exercise of its sovereignty, -- the
right to declare who are its citizens.[State v. Fowler, 41 La. Ann. 380]
[6
S. 602 (1889), emphasis added]
The
first clause of the fourteenth
amendment of the federal Constitution
made negroes citizens of the United States**, and citizens of the state in
which they reside, and thereby created two classes of
citizens, one of the United States** and the other of the state.
[4
Dec. Dig. '06, p. 1197, sec. 11]
["Citizens"
(1906), emphasis added]
There
are, then, under our republican form of government,two classes of
citizens, one of the United States** and one of the state. One class of
citizenship may exist in a person, without the other, as in the case of a
resident of the District of Columbia; but both classes usually exist in the
same person.[Gardina v. Board of Registrars, 160 Ala. 155]
[48
S. 788, 791 (1909), emphasis added]
There
is a distinction between citizenship of the United States** and citizenship of
a particular state, and a person may be the former without being the latter.
[Alla
v. Kornfeld, 84 F.Supp. 823] [(1949) headnote 5, emphasis added]
A
person may be a citizen of the United States** and yet be not identified or
identifiable as a citizen of any particular state.[Du Vernay v. Ledbetter]
[61 So.2d 573, emphasis added]
...
citizens of the District of Columbia were not granted the privilege of
litigating in the federal courts on the ground of diversity of citizenship.
Possibly no better reason for this fact exists than such citizens were
not thought of when the judiciary article [III] of the federal Constitution was
drafted. ... citizens of the United States** ... were also not
thought of; but in any event a citizen of the United States**, who is
not a citizen of any state, is not within the language of the [federal] Constitution.[Pannill
v. Roanoke, 252 F. 910, 914] [emphasis
added]
That
there is a citizenship of the United States and a citizenship of a
state, and the privileges and immunities of one are not the same as the
other is well established by the decisions of the courts of this country. [Tashiro
v. Jordan, 201 Cal. 236 (1927)]
No
fortifying authority is necessary to sustain the proposition that in the United
States a double citizenship exists. A citizen of the United States is a
citizen of the Federal Government and at the same time a citizen of
the State in which he resides. Determination of what is qualified
residence within a State is not here necessary. Suffice it to say that one possessing
such double citizenship owes allegiance and is entitled to protection from each
sovereign to whose jurisdiction he is subject.
[Kitchens v. Steele, 112 F.Supp. 383 (USDC/WDMO 1953)]
The
privileges and immunities clause of the Fourteenth
Amendment protects very few rights
because it neither incorporates any of the Bill of Rights nor protects all
rights of individual citizens. See Slaughter-House Cases, 83 U.S.
(16 Wall.) 36, 21 L.Ed. 394 (1873). Instead, this provision protects only those
rights peculiar to being a citizen of the federal government; it does not
protect those rights which relate to state citizenship.
In conclusion….
Attacking Americans
who are not obligated in any way to pay federal income taxes, and certainly not
obligated to pay “municipal” taxes merely disguised more generally as “federal”
taxes, is against the law, both statutory and Public. Coercing exempt persons and/or denying their
claim of exemption is a criminal act of extortionate racketeering and inland
piracy.
There
are American state nationals (people who live as non-federal, non-citizens) and
American State Citizens (who occupy public offices of the land jurisdiction
states). These are distinctly different
groups within one Body Politic which is foreign to the “United States” as
defined in Title 26 and throughout Federal Code.
None
of them are naturally liable to pay federal income taxes and none of them are
subject to territorial or municipal law.
The sooner IRS employees become fully acquainted with these facts and
the limitations of their powers and jurisdictions with respect to these Americans,
the better for everyone involved.
These
facts are unwritten by the most fundamental principles giving rise to the
government of this country. Please note
the following:
The
limited and exclusive power of legislation conferred on the Congress and the
geographic authority of these powers is summed up by these controlling sections
of the actual Constitution:
- “power of personal and subject-matter legislation throughout the Union and upon the high seas at Art, I, § 8, cl. 1-16;
- “power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation over (what will be) the District of Columbia at Art, I, § 8, cl. 17; and
- “constructive (implied) power of territorial, personal, and subject-matter legislation at Art. IV, § 3, cl. 2 in the form of ‘Rules and Regulations,’ id., ‘respecting the Territory or other Property belonging to the United States,’ id., i.e., federal territories and enclaves.
Please note that the Constitution confers upon
Congress no power of territorial legislation over any person or
property anywhere in the Union.
Unless a person is naturally and/or truly voluntarily subject to the
Territorial “United States” defined as the District of Columbia in Title 26, they
cannot be subjected as a Municipal citizen, either; and Congress has no delegated
legislative power allowing it to usurp its territorial or municipal authority
upon the actual states and people otherwise.
Read that as----no means no. There’s a difference between consensual sex
and rape.
When people born on the land of one of the actual
organic states claim their non-territorial, non-municipal, non-citizen
political status and give evidence of the same intention by issuing an Act of
Expatriation from the presumption of Territorial citizenship, and the surrender
of the Municipal PERSON issued to them back to the Secretary of the Treasury,
and otherwise give Notice of their revocation of election to pay federal income
taxes or to otherwise subject themselves and their assets to any territorial or
municipal code, that decision must be respected and adhered to by all agents of the territorial
and municipal government without question or exception.
You can tax actual federal territorial and municipal
employees all you like. You can tax
political asylum seekers and immigrants. You can tax people who are knowingly and voluntarily officers
and employees of federally chartered corporations.
What you cannot do is to blindly assume that the
existence of a Social Security Number and Masterfile Account establishes any
valid basis for presuming (1) the political status of any individual or (2) any
basis for assuming and assessing federal tax liabilities or other merely
presumed obligations.
This circumstance is the result of self-interested
mismanagement of federal agencies and departments for several generations. It derives from wholesale distribution of
Social Security Numbers and accounts by the Social Security Administration without
respect for the limitations imposed by the actual law and without full
disclosure to applicants. It derives
from purposeful efforts of the Congress to receive income from Americans under
false pretenses—the presumption that they are knowingly and willingly acting as
“volunteer” Warrant Officers in the Merchant Marine Service. Most of all, it results from widespread
ignorance among Revenue Agents, federal program administrators, and the general
public.
All federal employees, all federal Territorial and
Municipal citizens, all federal program administrators and managers need to be
fully cognizant of these facts and you are encouraged to share them with your
staff, your domestic judicial officers, your family and your friends.
Federal service is meant to be an honorable occupation
worthy of respect and support, but when it devolves to purposeful racketeering
against the people this same service is meant to serve, prosecution and
conflict is the inevitable result.
It is important for federal employees –especially revenue
agents and federal territorial and municipal judicial officers--- to realize
that when they misapply the law and contribute to these self-interested
confusions they are committing serious crimes of racketeering, unlawful
conversion of assets, inland piracy, personage, and barratry against their
employers and benefactors. These
international crimes against Americans have been promoted by the federal
governmental services corporations under a pretense of war and wartime
necessity. It is therefore necessary to
also address this claim.
The Territorial aka “Federal” Government was
created in 1868 in the wake of what is misleadingly called the “American Civil
War” upon the release of the so-called Federal Constitution. This document, the
“Constitution of the United States of America” presents articles of
incorporation for a corporation doing business as the “United States of America”
cleverly disguised via similar names deceit to resemble the actual
Constitution.
Please note that the actual constitution is: “The
Constitution for the united States of America”, not “the Constitution of the
United States of America”. And both these
documents are different from the municipal constitution called the “Constitution
of the United States”.
This conflict, the so-called “Civil War” was in
fact an illegal commercial mercenary conflict taking place on our shores. It was never declared by any action of the
united States of America in Congress Assembled, and it was never resolved by
any peace treaty. Instead, President
Johnson declared peace on the land jurisdiction via three public declarations
creating a binding contract mandating peace---once again underscoring the fact
that this was a commercial mercenary action and no form of actual “war” at
all.
Ever since then there has been no sovereign
government invoked and no competent land jurisdiction Congress of the actual
states of the Union has been convened.
As a result, all so-called “wars” have instead been commercial mercenary
actions carried out by corporations and/or internal domestic police actions.
Read that as: Congress has no “war powers”. “War” has specific requirements and
definitions under international law, and twist and turn as they might, the
members of Congress--- as that body has operated since 1860 ---cannot declare
actual war or take refuge in any claim of war powers or any doctrine of
necessity with respect to the actual states and people of the Union. What began as a fraudulent and illegal
commercial mercenary action remains a fraudulent and illegal commercial
mercenary action subject to prosecution as fraud.
It should surprise nobody that the actions of
Congress seeking to enrich itself and to usurp against the lawful government of
the actual United States by bolstering its territorial hegemony and deceptively
terming it the [territorial] “United States” as seen in Title 26, is conceived
in fraud and word-smithing and similar names deceits going back six
generations.
All Territorial (States of States) and Municipal
(STATES OF STATES) are merely franchises of self-interested federal commercial
corporations. They have no vested authority
related to the American states and people and have fraudulently usurped upon
the jurisdiction and property assets of their employers.
Without the ability to engage in actual war these
various commercial corporations have rampaged around under false pretenses and
have criminally trespassed on the Americans they are supposed to provide with “essential
government services”. They have also
caused a great deal of trouble throughout the rest of the world.
As federal employees and as citizens of the
Territorial and Municipal “United States” it is very important for you to
become fully aware of the limitations of your position of limited delegated
authority and the substantially unfavorable circumstances created by these past
actions, events, and public policies espoused by these various incorporated
entities.
You should also know that there is no “state”
immunity available to invoke as protection against your actions as employees of
commercial corporations and in most cases, your offices are not properly
insured or bonded. The sovereign
government of this country is vested entirely in the American people and their
jural assemblies at both the county and state levels. Their states are the only ones enjoying
sovereign immunity.
This Public Notice is provided in the interest of avoiding
unnecessary conflicts between Americans and their federal employees.
All legal presumptions regarding political status
based on the existence of Social Security Numbers and Masterfile Accounts are
being based on insupportable evidences obtained under conditions of
non-disclosure and semantic deceit and implemented via the purposeful World War
II Victory Tax circumvention of the actual law pertaining to the issuance of
Social Security Numbers.
Such presumptions of federal territorial or federal
municipal citizenship cannot be maintained in the face of direct objection and
reasonable proof of revocation by American state nationals and American State
Citizens.
Notice to Agents is Notice to Principals; Notice to
Principals is Notice to Agents
The American States and People
c/o 1336 Staubbach Circle
Anchorage, Alaska 99508
