Friday, November 2, 2018
'Migrant Caravan' Members Sue Trump Over 'Shockingly Unconstitutional' Asylum Crackdown
Global Genius Trust http://www.ggtrust.com
'Migrant Caravan' Members Sue Trump Over 'Shockingly Unconstitutional' Asylum Crackdown FACT: The "mockingbird press" wants us to pretend that our U.S. Constitutional rights extend TO THE ENTIRE WORLD. That is FALLACIOUS REASONING at its best. Stop it now. Share the following information. If you do not accept the responsibility for protecting your own rights... nobody else will do it. QUOTE: We'll know our disinformation program is complete when everything the American public believes is false.-- William Casey, CIA Director (from first staff meeting in 1981)
FACT: Most of us living in the USA are not migrants. We were born here. We are the citizens of the USA and we are legally protected by our constitutional rights. ILLEGAL ALIENS and those OUTSIDE OF OUR BORDERS are not. FACT: The U.S. Constitution, along with the Bill of Rights (aka 1-10 Amendments) as well as the Bill of Rights voted into every state constitution, apply to those who are LEGAL citizens... natural born and naturalized. They do NOT apply to illegals anywhere. FACT: Americans have been taught FALSE information since the end of WW-1... so go figure... they have no clue the legal definition of "Constitutional Rights"... and even the liberalized judges with perks have no clue. HUGE NEWS: The Federal Republic for the United States was reinstated via the International legal institution called The Hague in 2012... and copies of the documents have been widely disseminated... which MEANS.... THAT OUR ORIGINAL RIGHTS ARE RESTORED and the liberal Progressive "ca-ca" has been removed.
KNOWLEDGE:
Constitutional Rights - Legal Dictionary | Law.com https://dictionary.law.com/Default.aspx?selected=314 constitutional rights. n. rights given or reserved to the people by the U.S. Constitution, and in particular, the Bill of Rights (first ten amendments). These rights ...
CALL THE PRESIDENT and your reps... tell them.... shut the border, shoot invaders, and use the first paragraph of the U.S. Constitution which states: FIRST PARAGRAPH of U.S. Constitution: We the People of the United States, in Order to form a more perfect Union, establish Justice, insure domestic Tranquility, provide for the common defence, promote the general Welfare, and secure the Blessings of Liberty to ourselves and our Posterity, do ordain and establish this Constitution for the United States of America.
https://www.archives.gov/founding-docs/constitution-transcript ---------- Forwarded message --------- From: From the Trenches World Report <donotreply@wordpress.com> Date: Fri, Nov 2, 2018 at 9:47 AM Subject: [New post] Migrants traveling to US sue Trump, government; claim violation of constitutional rights
http://fromthetrenchesworldreport.com/migrants-traveling-to-us-sue-trump-government-claim-violation-of-constitutional-rights/235800
++++++
SECOND SOURCE 'Migrant Caravan' Members Sue Trump Over 'Shockingly Unconstitutional' Asylum Crackdown
https://www.zerohedge.com/news/2018-11-02/migrant-caravan-members-sue-trump-over-shockingly-unconstitutional-border-policies
by Tyler Durden
Fri, 11/02/2018 - 09:15
President Trump's rhetoric about the organized 'caravans' of migrants plodding toward the US border has been nothing short of incendiary, as the president has threatened to send as many as 15,000 troops to the border to stop the mobs of "dangerous people" from entering the country. Among other claims, Trump hinted that he might ask soldiers to fire on the migrants if they start pelting border agents with rocks, and that he would be building "massive cities of tents" to house the would-be asylum seekers as they await their hearings in an effort to end the "abuse" of the US asylum seekers.
Well, apparently these remarks haven't sat well with members of the caravan and their shadowy financial backers, because a group of 12 migrants, six of them children, have filed a lawsuit against Trump, claiming his efforts to beef up security along the border, and threats to deprive them of asylum, represent "shockingly unconstitutional" attacks on their rights, according to Fox News.
The Fifth Amendment stipulates that "no person… shall be compelled in any criminal case to be a witness against himself, nor be deprived of life, liberty, or property, without due process of law." And ironically, none other than former Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia helped cement these protections by ruling in a 1993 case that "it is well established that the Fifth Amendment entitles aliens to due process of law in a deportation proceeding."
Twelve Honduran nationals, including six children, were named as plaintiffs in the lawsuit, which was filed Thursday in the US District Court in Washington, D.C. The lawsuit alleges that it is widely known that Guatemala, Honduras and El Salvador are enmeshed in an "undergoing a well-documented human rights crisis." Furthermore, the suit claims that Trump cannot stop migrants from entering the US when they have a credible claim of asylum, according to the Washington Examiner.
Here's more from Fox:
The lawsuit points to Trump's claim that he will prevent the caravan from entering the U.S. It claims that the president cannot stop asylum-seekers by employing the military - when they have a fair claim. The suit criticized the president's attempt at stoking "fear and hysteria," by claiming that criminals and gang members have joined the caravan.
The suit cited a Trump interview with Fox News’ Laura Ingraham, where the president laid out plans to build tent cities to house migrants. The suit questioned the functionality of such a project, and asked if these living quarters would qualify under the Flores Agreement of 1997. The agreement protects asylum-seekers’ rights and limits how long minors can be held.
Earlier this summer, a federal judge in California rejected a request by the administration to modify Flores to allow for longer family detention. Administration officials say they have the authority to terminate the agreement, but that is likely to be tested in court.
The suit also alleges that the US can't send troops across the US-Mexico border to stop migrants from entering the US. It also argues that Trump can't demand that asylum seekers present themselves at lawful border-crossing points, as US law states that an asylum seeker can declare their intention to seek asylum anywhere (the president said last week that he intends to issue an executive order declaring that asylum seekers declare at lawful border checkpoints).
Nexus Services Inc. is funding the lawsuits through a civil rights law firm called Nexus Derechos Humanos (Human Rights) Attorneys Inc.
"Federal law enables migrants to apply for asylum in the United States. President Trump and his administration have used ‘increased enforcement,’ like separating families and lengthening detention to violate migrant rights," Mike Donovan, president of Nexus Services, said in the release.
There is another legal issue at stake, according to the lawsuit. The U.S. cannot send troops into Mexico to cut off the caravan from crossing the border. Even with the National Guard at the border, once an immigrant indicates an intention to apply for asylum, the process has begun.
The White House, Department of Justice and the Department of Homeland Security were all named as defendants in the suit. The lawsuit is seeking an immediate judgment for the plaintiffs and a court declaration that Trump's border plan is unconstitutional.
END QUOTE
Tucker Carlson: Illegal Immigration: It's About Power
PragerU
Historically, Democrats supported strong borders because they knew American workers could never compete with illegal immigrants. Now, they regularly support “open borders.” So why the drastic change? Tucker Carlson, host of Tucker Carlson Tonight, explains.
Now a FOURTH caravan has left El Salvador to join other groups of migrants trekking through Mexico on their way to the US
The Daily Mail
- Some 2,000 migrants traveling in two groups departed El Salvador's capital of San Salvador Wednesday
- First, largest caravan numbering 4,000 planned to rest at least a day or longer in the southern city of Juchitan beginning Wednesday
- Its leaders are trying to convince Mexican authorities to arrange transportation for them to Mexico City some 700 miles away
- Second caravan of 1,000 was trailing 250 miles behind the first and was in Tapachula, Mexico
- US Border Patrol this week warned Texas landowners along the southern border to get ready for the arrival of 'armed civilians'
- Head of the Texas Minutemen militia said he already has members at three points of the state's border with Mexico, with up to 100 more expected to arrive in the coming days
Some 2,000 migrants traveling in two groups departed El Salvador's capital Wednesday morning on their way to the US by way of Mexico, making it the fourth caravan to embark on the 1,000-journey in the last two weeks. Continue article plus video here
Malaysian Financier Low Taek Jho and Former Banker Ng Chong Hwa Indicted for Conspiring to Launder Billions of Dollars
Department of Justice Office of Public Affairs
Malaysian Financier Low Taek Jho and Former Banker Ng Chong Hwa Indicted for Conspiring to Launder Billions of Dollars
released on November 1, 2018
FOR IMMEDIATE RELEASE
Press Release Number:
18-1429
Thursday, November 1, 2018
Malaysian Financier Low Taek Jho, Also Known As “Jho Low,” and Former Banker Ng Chong Hwa, Also Known As “Roger Ng,” Indicted for Conspiring to Launder Billions of Dollars in Illegal Proceeds and to Pay Hundreds of Millions of Dollars in Bribes
Former Banker Tim Leissner Pleaded Guilty to Conspiring to Launder Money and to Violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act Related to 1MDB
A three-count criminal indictment was unsealed today in federal court in the Eastern District of New York charging Low Taek Jho, 36, also known as “Jho Low,” and Ng Chong Hwa, 51, also known as “Roger Ng,” with conspiring to launder billions of dollars embezzled from 1Malaysia Development Berhad (1MDB), Malaysia’s investment development fund, and conspiring to violate the Foreign Corrupt Practices Act (FCPA) by paying bribes to various Malaysian and Abu Dhabi officials. As part of the three-count indictment, Ng is also charged with conspiring to violate the FCPA by circumventing the internal accounting controls of a major New York-headquartered financial institution (Financial Institution), which underwrote more than $6 billion in bonds issued by 1MDB in three separate bond offerings in 2012 and 2013, while Ng was employed at the Financial Institution as a managing director. Ng was arrested earlier today in Malaysia, pursuant to a provisional arrest warrant issued at the request of the United States. Low remains at large....Continue article here
Chinese, Taiwanese companies indicted for stealing U.S. trade secrets
Nov. 1 (UPI) — A federal grand jury indicted companies in China and Taiwan on charges related to a conspiracy to steal trade secrets from an Idaho-based company, the U.S. Department of Justice said Thursday.
Along with the two companies, three individuals were charged with a conspiracy to commit economic espionage, among other crimes to steal trade secrets from Micron Technology, Inc., which specializes in developing and manufacturing memory products such as dynamic random-access memory, the Justice Department said.
“Micron is worth an estimated $100 billion and has a 20 to 25 percent share of the dynamic random access memory industry — a technology not possessed by the Chinese until very recently,” Attorney General Jeff Sessions said.
The indictment stated that Chen Zhengkun, aka Stephen Chen, served as general manager and chairman of an electronics corporation that Micron acquired in 2013. Chen then left to become president of a Micron subsidiary in Taiwan, Micron Memory Taiwan, which was responsible for manufacturing at least one of Micron’s DRAM chips.
In 2015, Chen resigned from MMT and began working at Taiwanese semiconductor foundry United Microelectronics Corporation. While working at UMC Chen allegedly arranged a cooperation agreement with a Chinese state-owned business, Fujian Jinhua Integrated Circuit Company, to transfer DRAM technology for Fujian Jinhua to mass produce...Continue article here
Dual Versus Singular Citizenship
By Anna Von Reitz
Dual Versus Singular Citizenship
One of the things that sets "U.S. Citizenship" apart from American
State Citizenship is duality. The Federales --- from their standpoint
anyway --- are content to let you keep your "state citizenship" intact
and still also be considered a "U.S. Citizen". As it says in their 14th
Amendment --- "citizen of the United States" and "the state in which
they reside".
[Please note --- it's their 14th Amendment, not ours, and it's an
"Amendment" to their corporation's Articles of Incorporation disguised
as "a" Constitution. And you are right, their 14th Amendment was never
ratified by the States of the Union, for the simple reason that amending
the By-Laws of a Scottish commercial corporation only requires approval
by the Board of Directors --- in this case, the Territorial United
States Congress.]
The problem is that the Federales can't alter the rules that the States adopted, which require a single State Citizenship.
The actual States don't recognize Dual Citizenship. You are either a Minnesotan or you are not.
It doesn't matter to them if you came from Germany or Zimbabwe. You
have the option once you have immigrated through the U.S. and
established your new permanent domicile on the land of Minnesota to
declare yourself a Minnesotan.
When you do, you have to leave all other claims of foreign allegiance
and nationality behind. The Founders considered Dual Citizenship to be
"serving two Masters" and an inherent "conflict of interest" that could
not be condoned.
So,
if you wish to retain your identity as a Wisconsinite, you have to go
whole hog or none. Wisconsin will not recognize you as one of its own
if you voluntarily retain any other political allegiance, including any
allegiance to the Territorial State of Wisconsin or the Municipal STATE
OF WISCONSIN. You have to cleave to the actual State and not merely
"reside" there on a temporary basis, if you want to be recognized as an
American State Citizen.
Throughout most of our history this was clearly understood and it was
also understood that our people sometimes migrated back and forth
between their State Citizenship and "United States Citizenship". Men
who served in the military were considered to be on a temporary "loan"
to the United States and to be "residing" in Federal jurisdiction during
their period of service obligation, but returned home upon discharge
from the service. Same thing with Congressional Delegates, who did their
business in the District of Columbia, and then returned home to their
home States.
The
First Naturalization Act passed by the United States Congress described a
lengthy process by which an American State Citizen could transition to
permanent United States Citizenship, if they wished to do so. It
required posting Notices over time and supporting oneself without public
assistance and committing no felonies, etc., There is no doubt that
adopting "United States Citizenship" versus birthright citizenship as a
Citizen of Maine, was a sober, deliberate, and lengthy process.
Also, all new immigrants had to pass through "United States
Citizenship" before adopting a final State Citizenship, and again, the
decision to adopt State Citizenship required deliberate action on the
part of each one.
Say that you came from Germany originally. You would first pass through
the Naturalization process and become a "United States Citizen". You
were then free to move about the country and not subject to the INS
anymore, no green cards, no quasi-parole status as a visitor--- but you
were not a State Citizen.
In order to become a State Citizen, you had to (and still have to) meet
other requirements and make the deliberate choice to "declare" your
intention and publish it and establish a home in the State of your
choice and stay there for a stipulated period of time (usually a year)
without committing any felonies or making use of public assistance.
There is a famous case from Minnesota (Rheume) that discusses the necessity of immigrants declaring their State Citizenship.
The fundamental difference is that "U.S. Citizens" occupy the Federal
jurisdiction within a State and "reside" in the federated "States of
States", whereas State Citizens live in their State of the Union.
Example: An active duty Lieutenant in the US Air Force lives in the
State of South Dakota, but my friend Anne lives in South Dakota
"proper".
Think in
terms of Army bases like Fort Hood, for example, which exists within the
borders of Texas. You have people from every State who live within the
confines of Fort Hood which is Federal Territory within Texas and for
the term of their service obligation, all those active duty personnel
are "U.S. Citizens" living in the "State of Texas" even though they may
have been born in Texas and have their natural birthright nationality
and citizenship as Texans.
When they leave active duty and inform the General Staff of the Army
that they are returning home to Texas and their birthright political
status, they pop back into view as Texans and as State Citizens of
Texas.
The British
Territorial United States and the Municipal United States oligarchy run
by the members of the Territorial Congress have long sought to keep
everyone in the status of "U.S. Citizen" because that allows them to tax
and control and make claims against the assets of the people involved.
It is that monetary self-interest that has led to most of the abuses we
now suffer and also to the corruption of the courts and the obfuscation
of the facts about State Citizenship.
They don't want you to know that you can adopt your lawful State
Citizenship and enjoy your freedoms and the guarantees of the
Constitutions, because they lose money and control when you renounce
"U.S. Citizenship" in favor of, for example, Texas Citizenship.
Nonetheless it is your birthright as an American, and so long as you
are not a federal employee, dependent, or "voluntarily" operating as a
U.S. corporation, THEY have nothing to say about it, except, "Yes, Sir!"
$100 Reward --- Find the Missing "Republic"
By Anna Von Reitz
Times
being what they are, and the expenses of The Living Law Firm being what
they are, I can't afford to offer a big reward (on the off chance that I
have to pay up) but I am sick and tired of having to argue about this
with knotheads and I will pay $100 of my own money to anyone who can
prove that a singular national "Republic" exists.
Yes, there was/is a "Grand Army of the Republic" --- the Union Army during the Civil War.
Yes, there was/is a song called "The Battle Hymn of the Republic".
Yes, there is an oblique reference in "The Pledge of Allegiance" to "the Republic for which it stands."
Yes,
Ben Franklin is reported to have told a by-stander when asked what kind
of government we have --- "A Republic. If you can keep it."
And yes, we are guaranteed a "republican form of government" in the Constitution.
We even have "The Supreme Republican Declaration of the United Colonies of America".
But
nowhere can I find in any of this any substantiating proof that "a"
Republic was ever formed on this Continent to represent all the state
republics.
Instead,
what I find is a consistent reference to our Federation of States, The
United States of America ---- the unincorporated version. And it only
operates in international jurisdiction.
If
any of you researchers out there can shed light on this question,
please weigh in. The monetary reward is slight, but the satisfaction of
proving me wrong might be worth something, right?
I've
looked. I can't find it. And until some proof surfaces ---and despite
the popular references and belief that "a" Republic exists--- I
say "the" Republic is the Civil War Era equivalent of an Urban Myth.
Many
of our researchers are hurting financially and having a hard time
keeping the lights on and the printer ink in stock. They are asking me
for help and so I have to turn to all of you reading this.
If
you can see how important it is for us to know the truth about our
history and government --- and be able to prove it --- please consider
"joining the party" and doing some research yourself or helping to
support the expenses of those who do. We take donations to the cause
via my PayPal account:
avannavon@gmail.com and via snail mail: Anna Maria Riezinger, c/o Box 520994, Big Lake, Alaska 99652.
“WE FEAR NO POLICE, WE HAVE WEAPONS”…. Second Violent “Caravan” with “BOMBS AND GUNS” Storms into Mexico
Geller Report
The Democrats are on their side.
President Trump is deploying thousands of US troops to the border.
SECOND MIGRANT CARAVAN STORMS INTO MEXICO: ‘VIOLENT’ GROUP FROM CENTRAL AMERICA CARRYING BOMBS AND GUNS DEFIES A HUGE POLICE PRESENCE TO CROSS THE BORDER FROM GUATEMALA AS TRUMP DEPLOYS 5,200 TROOPS
- The second caravan making their way up through Central America have members armed with explosives
- Had gasoline bombs made of soft-drink bottles, and improvised PVC tubes to launch fireworks
- Mexican federal police briefly blocked the migrants from crossing the Suchiate River on Monday
- But the migrants soon defied the law enforcement presence and broke through into Mexico
- Many tried to swim or wade across to Mexico, some while carrying children
- Law enforcement avoided a second day of violence, a day after a confrontation left one migrant dead...continue article here
Jeff Hays Films: Healthy information
Hey! I hope your day is off to an amazing start. Life is good, and today's email is just a quick round-up of some recent articles you may have missed. Check 'em out below...
* 15 superfoods that keep your blood sugar low, burn fat & prevent diabetes(great for blood pressure and heart health too) * Try this simple technique to REVERSE type 2 Diabetes, naturally (while getting off harmful drugs & reducing abdominal fat too) * 4 raw honey secrets for your hair, skin, and nails * This "super-chocolate" might be better than sex & stops cravings * Healthy paleo mayo w/ apple cider vinegar (bring back healthy potato salad and tuna salad!) * The #1 muscle that STOPS joint & back pain, anxiety & looking fat: Best, 
Jeff Hays
Jeff Hays Films
"Movies that Make Movements"
|
The Grow Network: Natural Cold Care in 3 Easy Steps
|
|
Mike Adams: Free Your Mind: A powerful new “Red Pill” video from Mike Adams teaches you how to DE-hypnotize yourself
Natural News
I’ve just released another powerful “Red Pill” video that teaches you how to de-hypnotize yourself from the world of hypnotic language, social influence and neurolinguistic programming that hopes to keep you enslaved...see video here
I’ve just released another powerful “Red Pill” video that teaches you how to de-hypnotize yourself from the world of hypnotic language, social influence and neurolinguistic programming that hopes to keep you enslaved...see video here
20 Amazing Photo's
True Scale of These Things Is Surprising
1. The immense size of a fully grown wombat.
2. This is a giant leatherback sea turtle.
3. How many Earths would be able to fit inside the Sun?
4. Here's an average-sized giant African land snail.
5. I had no idea an eagle talon was so enormous!
6. The size of an average blue whale's heart.
7. The Titanic in a comparison with a modern cruise liner.
8. Quetzalcoatlus Northropi - the largest flying animal to ever live
9. A pair of fully-inflated horse lungs.
10. This is how big a moose really is.
11. Nice to meet you!
12. Some road signs really are that huge!
13. This saltwater crocodile is a colossus!
14. The view from Earth if our moon was replaced by Saturn.
15. The true size of Michaelangelo's David.
16. The terrifying size of a gorilla's hand.
17. Standing beside a single wind turbine blade.
18. Comparing a comet to the city of LA.
19. Here's a giant oceanic manta ray. Scary!
20. Here's how big the USA is in comparison with the moon.
Putin’s Comments About Satanism & Pedophilia Within Politics Are Turning Out To Be True
IN BRIEF
- The Facts:A few years ago, Vladimir Putin mentioned Satanism and Pedophilia within politics, and he hasn't been the first to do so. He expressed how there are attempts to normalize these practices within society and make it global.
- Reflect On:Who are we electing? Who are the people that have amassed so much power that they practically control all resources on planet Earth? We do we continue to elect corrupt politicians who don't have the will of humanity at heart? What's going on inside?...continue reading here
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
