Tuesday, January 1, 2019
#Net4TruthUSA 340 — Revolution 2.0 Looming
USA Net4Truth
The absolute BRILLIANCE of what SEEMS to have been a LOSS in the House of Representatives, if what I speculate is true... Will have the MSM in such a Gordian knot of BS, they won't know what to do. Nothing on the Internet is ever gone: https://www.google.com/search?q=phase... Northwoods Document http://net4truthusa.com/operationnort...
SUN TZU: Thank you for your awesome encouragement
I saw your post and comments on Freewills post. I did reply but my comments and reply's are not being posted so I thought I would post here to thank you. Happy New Year!
Research has found that 80% of New Year’s resolutions will have failed by February and there’s a simple reason for this startlingly high figure. Because the resolutions that we set are just too difficult and too unrealistic.
Completely overhauling your life takes significant effort, tonnes of willpower, and often a level of determination that many of us simply find impossible to achieve.
Don’t worry though, it’s not to late to use the New Year as an excuse to change your life for the better, and it doesn’t have to be complicated. Here are ten awesome New Year’s resolutions that you can actually keep:
- Try A New AdventureThe infamous pirate Captain Hook once said that death was the only great adventure he had left. But whilst we wait for that adventure to begin, why not resolve to go on the adventure you’ve always wanted to take?
We all have adventurous dreams: To travel more. See the world. Or simply visit your cousins in Florida for a couple of days. So why not stop putting it off and book that trip you always wanted to take.
Travel broadens the horizons and enriches the mind. It is a wonderful way to learn more about different cultures, to educate yourself about world history and international politics, or simply to meet new people and have a hell of a lot of fun!
This might seem like a pretty big resolution, but modern travel is actually much easier than you might think. All you really need is a loose plan, a passport, and the determination to see it through. After all, you’re only young once. What have you got to lose?
2. Have One Alcohol-Free Evening, Every Week
Do you like a drink or two? The number of alcoholic drinks you consume in a week can quickly add up, often without you noticing.
A beer with the guys at the weekend. A bottle of wine with your girl after work. A catch up in the bar with your team from the office. Before you know it, you’re drinking every day and dealing with the consequences.
Hangovers, headaches, dehydration, dry mouth…the list of negative side effects caused by excessive alcohol consumption can seem endless. But let’s not forget that it can also be very enjoyable too.
If you enjoy drinking alcohol and it forms a key part of your social life then resolving to give up the booze simply isn’t realistic. And, let’s be honest, it doesn’t sound like much fun either!
So why not make a more realistic alcohol-related resolution you can actually stick to? Why not resolve to have just one night off the booze every week? This will force you to take some downtime (which is actually beneficial for your mental health) and will give your body the chance to recover, refresh and rejuvenate itself.
It’s an easy resolution to stick to, and one that will do you a lot of good!
3. Get Off the Snack Train
There’s nothing better than a late night snack: particularly if you’ve been out to a bar or party!
But most late night snacks are laden with sugar, fat, and they also tend to be high in stodgy carbohydrates. That’s longhand for their not good for your body and they make you fat!
Resolving to give up all snacking is a resolution that is likely to end in failure. Instead, why not resolve to give up snacking at night? It’s a goal that should be much easier to stick to, and will also eliminate the excess eating that’s worst for your health.
The speed of your metabolism is linked to the time of day and, for most people, your metabolism tends to slow down at night. That means that when you eat after dark you’re more likely to gain weight: not the ideal time for high calorie snacks!
We’re not saying you should give up snacking altogether. But you’ll be amazed at the improvement you’ll see to your waistline if you’re able to give up snacking after 6pm. A realistic goal, and an easy resolution to stick to!...Continue here
Funny Resolutions For New Year
- Start buying lottery tickets at a luckier store.
- Remember to brush teeth with bristly end of toothbrush.
- Don't eat medicine just because it looks like candy.
- Learn what the hell "resolution" means.
- Always replace the gas nozzle before driving away from the pump.
- I will always "check for paper" when leaving the restroom.
- I will try to drive closer to the speed limit.
- I will keep an extra safe distance when driving behind police cars.
- I will no longer waste my time relieving the past and instead I will spend it worrying about the future.
- I will not bore my boss with the same excuse for taking leaves. I will think of some more excuses.
- I will do less laundry and use more deodorant.
- I will avoid taking a bath whenever possible and conserve more water.
- Assure my lawyer that I will never again show up drunk at a custody hearing.
- I will give up chocolates totally. 100%. Completely. Honestly!
- I will try to figure out why I really need nine e-mail addresses.
- I will stop sending e-mails to my wife (husband).
- I resolve to work with neglected children -- my own.
- I will spend less than one hour a day on the Internet. This, of course, will be hard to estimate since I'm not a clock watcher....Continue here
Gardener Ignores the Laws of Nature!
Eva
Our mission is to bring awareness to any issue which challenges the security, sovereignty
or domestic tranquility of our beloved Nation, The United States of America.
In God We Trust!
______________________________________________
Jeb Gardener -- Published on May 18, 2017
Can a complete hydroponic salad be grown in one tote? Watch me violate the laws of
hydroponics and find out.
From: robert bowen; via Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr / Wow!!! This Lady is beautiful and enlightened.
The Truth About All Central Bank Controlled Nations
Published on December 30, 2018 by IWB
Investment Watch - Spreading the Truth. Empowering the people.
The Fed is tyranny in the flesh, and it has been dictating US policy for more than a century. All of this interest goes into the hands of the hidden, private controllers of the Central Banking System.
--
Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot > http://conpats.blogspot.com
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot > http://conpats.blogspot.com
____________________________________________
President Trump's/Q Anon-Cabal Snake is getting removed-Counter-Attacks-Future predictions
Video > https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JQxg7uQubfM (34 minutes)
Utsava Psychic Medium -- Published on Dec 31, 2018
Learn about the recent Fake Alien Invasion, Bomb attacks and Power outages, which
Tweets by Obama and Hillary gave the terrorists signals for counter-attacks, what the
future holds, when the terrorist are going to attack the USA next and if they will be
caught, about JFK junior, Q Anon, Military Tribunals, the upcoming reset and more.
President Trump has stopped the largest International Human and Child trafficking rings.
His next project will be to stop World Hunger.
THIS IS A GREAT RESPONSE TO RACIST REPORTER DON LEMON ON CNN: Thursday, November 1, 2018 ― Former US Navy SEAL, Ephraim Mattos, has responded to comments made by Don Lemon on CNN’s
Eva
Our mission is to bring awareness to any issue which challenges the security, sovereignty
or domestic tranquility of our beloved Nation, The United States of America.
In God We Trust!
_______________
_____________________________________
From: peri mcmillan; via Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr
Subject: Amazing quote
THIS IS A GREAT RESPONSE TO CNN:
Thursday, November 1, 2018 ― Former US Navy SEAL, Ephraim Mattos, has responded to comments made by Don Lemon on CNN’s Cuomo Prime Time.
“We have to stop demonizing people and realize the biggest terror threat in this country is white men, most of them radicalized to the right, and we have to start doing something about them.” ― Don Lemon on CNN (October 29, 2018)
Here is Mattos’ response:
After surviving three wars, a gunshot wound, a near fatal drowning, a failed parachute, Taliban ambushes, ISIS snipers, mortars, mine-fields, suicide bombers and laying down my life for the cause of freedom while fighting shoulder-to-shoulder with my brother Arabs, Asians, Blacks, Hispanics, Christians, Muslims, Jews, Buddhists, Animists, and Atheists, I have now returned home to the USA where a CNN host has labeled me as a radicalized right wing terrorist simply because of my gender and the color of my skin.
I represent just one of the hundreds of thousands of conservative white men who have fought to preserve freedom in this great Nation and in other nations.
My forefathers are the 3% who founded this Republic against the might of the British Army. It was white Conservative men who died by the tens of thousands after charging into our southern states to free our black brothers from the slavery imposed on them by the Liberal left.
We were the ones who acknowledged that women have a right to vote. We held the line in WWI and charged the beaches of Normandy in WWII. We have fought for freedom and liberty for generations and we continue to do so today alongside all of our brothers and sisters regardless of their race or religion.
In the early 1930s, Hitler said the same thing about the Jews that Don Lemon of CNN just said about white men. This is the true face of the Democratic Party. First they enslaved and killed blacks, and now they use them to spew hatred and lies against the very people who have fought for generations to free them and uplift them.
Remember that when you vote.
One final thought: To make a point, I have referred to myself as a “white male” in the previous sentences multiple times, but I must make it clear that I identify as simply “American,” not as “white” or “male” or “Republican.”
Although blatantly racist and hateful, do not let Don Lemon’s ignorant words drive you into viewing yourself only by your race and religion. Identity politics does not lead to freedom. It only leads to hatred and division and an “us vs. them” mentality.
If CNN does not fire Don Lemon, it only goes to show that they are truly the “enemy of the people.”
― Ephraim Mattos, Former US Navy SEAL
--
Pastor Lee S Gliddon Jr
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot > http://conpats.blogspot.com
God's Word Christian Ministry
Conservative Patriot > http://conpats.blogspot.com
_____________________________________________
DMV Commits the crime of conversion – Violates the Fifth Amendment?
arnie
DMV Commits the crime of conversion – Violates the Fith Amendment?
Two Maxims of Law
• A
piratis et latronibus capta dominium non mutant.
Things captured by pirates or robbers do not change their
ownership.
• A
piratis aut latronibus capti liberi permanent.
Those captured by pirates or robbers remain free.
RIGHTS THAT
CANNOT BE TAKEN AWAY.
We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS
STATUTES ARE
NOT LAW – TO BE CONVICTED UNDER A STATUTE YOU MUST HAVE MY CONSENT.
We do NOT GIVE OUR CONSENT EVER. We are NOT U.S. CITIZENS, i.e. We are
living Souls and not a dead entity written in all upper-case letters on a piece
of paper or bond paper being claimed as a vessel owned by another living or
dead entity.
A “STATUTE” is NOT a law! Flournoy v. First National Bank of
Shreveport, 197 LA 1057. 3 So.2d 244, 248.
A “CODE” is NOT a law! In Re Self v. Rhay, Wn 2d 261, in point
of fact in law.
A concurrent or “joint resolution
of legislature is NOT “Law”. Koenig v.
Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N.E. 705, 707;
Ward v. State, 176 OKL. 368, 56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash. 2d 43, 110, P.2d 162, 165).
STATUTE. Black’s Law Dictionary, 4th Edition. The
written will of the legislature, solemnly expressed according to the forms
prescribed in the constitution; an act of the legislature.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – The
common law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land, the codes, rules,
regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law”. Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn (2d) 261.
U.S. SUPREME COURT DECISION – ALL codes, rules, and regulations are for
government authorities ONLY, not human/Creators in accordance with God’s Laws.
All codes, rules and regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due
process…” Rodriques v. Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d, 1344,
1348 (1985).
Supreme Court 1796- This decision has never been overturned:
United States Supreme Court Decision from 1796- [Cruden v. Neale, 2
N.C. 338 (1796) 2 S.E.] "There, every man is independent of all laws,
except those prescribed by nature. He is not bound by any institutions formed
by his fellowman without his consent."
“There are NO Judicial Courts in America and have not been since 1789.
“Judges” do NOT enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce
Statutes and Codes. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co., 261
U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“There have NOT been any “Judges” in America since 1789. There have
only been Administrators. FRC v. GE, 281 U.S. 464 Keller v. Potomac Elec. Co.,
261 U.S. 428 1 Stat. 138-178”
“The Supreme Court has warned, “Because of what appears to be Lawful
commands [Statutory Rules, Regulations and -codes–ordinances- and Restrictions]
on the surface, many citizens, because of their respect for what appears to be
law, are cunningly coerced into waiving their rights, due to ignorance…
[deceptive practices, constructive fraud, barratry, legal plunder, conversion,
and malicious prosecution in inferior administrative State courts].” (United
States v. Minker, 350 U.S. 179, 187, 76 S.Ct. 281, 100 L.Ed. 185 (1956);”
“The Common Law is the real law, the Supreme Law of the land. The
codes, rules, regulations, policy and statutes are “not the law.” (Self v.
Rhay, 61 Wn 2d 261), They are the law of government for internal regulation,
not the law of man, in his separate but equal station and natural state, a
sovereign foreign with respect to government generally.
“A concurrent or ‘joint resolution’ of legislature is not “Law,”
(Koenig v. Flynn, 258 N.Y. 292, 179 N. E. 705, 707; Ward v State, 176 Okl. 368,
56 P.2d 136, 137; State ex rel. Todd v. Yelle, 7 Wash.2d 443, 110 P.2d 162,
165).
All codes, rules, and regulations are for government authorities only,
not human/Creators in accord with God’s Laws. “All codes, rules, and
regulations are unconstitutional and lacking due process of Law..”(Rodriques v.
Ray Donavan, U.S. Department of Labor, 769 F.2d 1344, 1348 (1985)); …lacking
due process of law, in that they are ‘void for ambiguity’ in their failure to
specify the statutes’ applicability to ‘natural persons,’ otherwise depriving
the same of fair notice, as their construction by definition of terms aptly
identifies the applicability of such statutes to “artificial or fictional
corporate entities or ‘persons’, creatures of statute, or those by contract
employed as agents or representatives, departmental subdivisions, offices,
officers, and property of the government, but not the ‘Natural Person’ or
American citizen Immune from such jurisdiction of legalism.”
“A “Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of Shreveport,
197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),
A “Code’ or Statute’ is not a Law,” (Flournoy v. First Nat. Bank of
Shreveport, 197 La. 1067, 3 So.2d 244, 248),”
“A
“Code’ is not a Law,” (In Re Self v Rhay Wn 2d 261), in point of fact in Law).”
There is no warrant in law for such a holding. Gould v. Gould, 245 U.S.
151, at p. 153, 38 S.Ct. 53, 62 L.Ed. 211. In 51 American Jurisprudence,
"Taxation", Sec. 316, "Strict or Liberal Construction",
supported by a great wealth of authority, it is said:
'Although it is sometimes broadly stated either that tax laws are to be
strictly construed or, on the other hand, that such enactments are to be
liberally construed, this apparent conflict of opinion can be reconciled if it
is borne in mind that the correct rule appears to be that where the intent of
meaning of tax statutes, or statutes levying taxes, is doubtful, they are,
unless a contrary legislative intention appears, to be construed most strongly
against the government and in favor of the taxpayer or citizen. Any doubts as
to their meaning are to be resolved against the taxing authority and in favor
of the taxpayer. * * *'
WHERE IS YOUR MANDATORY FOREIGN AGENTS REGISTRATION ACT OF 1938?
https://www.justice.gov/nsd-fara
“THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA” is a franchise of the foreign corporation
calling its self: “THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA” both thereby being liable to
the international laws. You are all in violation of the International Covenants
on Civil and Political Rights:
Article 1
1. All peoples have the right of
self-determination, "By virtue of that right they freely determine their
political status and freely pursue their economic, social and cultural
development.
2. All peoples may, for their own
ends, freely dispose of their natural wealth and resources without prejudice to
any obligations arising out of international economic co-operation, based upon
the principle of mutual benefit, and
international law. In no case may a
people be deprived of its own means of subsistence.
3. The States Parties to the
present Covenant, including those having responsibility for the administration
of Non-Self-Governing and Trust Territories, shall promote the realization of
the right of self-determination, and shall respect that right, in conformity
with the provisions of the Charter of the United Nations.
Article 2
1. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes to respect and to ensure to all individuals within
its territory and subject to its Jurisdiction the rights recognized in the
present Covenant, without distinction of any kind, such as race, colour, sex,
language, religion, political or other opinion, national or social origin,
property, birth or other status.
2. Where not already provided for
by existing legislative or other measures, each State Party to the present
Covenant undertakes to take the necessary steps, in accordance with its
constitutional processes and with the provisions of the present Covenant, to
adopt such legislative or other measures as may be necessary to give effect to
the rights recognized in the present Covenant.
3. Each State Party to the
present Covenant undertakes:
(a) To ensure that any person
whose rights or freedoms as herein recognized are violated shall have an
effective remedy, notwithstanding that
the violation has been committed by persons acting in an official capacity;
Article 5
1. Nothing in the present
Covenant may be interpreted as implying for any State, group or person any
right to engage in any activity or perform any act aimed at the destruction of
any of the rights and freedoms recognized herein or at their limitation to a
greater extent than is provided for in the present Covenant.
2. There shall be no restriction
upon or derogation from any of the fundamental human rights recognized or
existing in any State Party to the present Covenant pursuant to law,
conventions, regulations or custom on the pretext that the present Covenant
does not recognize such rights or that it recognizes them to a lesser extent.
Article 7
No one shall be subjected to torture or to cruel, inhuman or degrading
treatment or punishment. In particular, no one shall be subjected without his
free consent to medical or scientific experimentation.
Article 8
1. No one shall be held in slavery; slavery and the slave-trade in all
their forms shall be prohibited.
2. No one shall be held in servitude.
3. (a) No one shall be required to perform forced or compulsory labour;
Article 9
1. Everyone has the right to
liberty and security of person. No one shall be subjected to arbitrary arrest or
detention. No one shall be deprived of his liberty except on such grounds and
in accordance with such procedure as are established by law.
Article 17
1. No one shall be subjected to
arbitrary or unlawful interference with his privacy, family, home or
correspondence, nor to unlawful attacks on his honour and reputation.
2. Everyone has the right to the protection of
the law against such interference or attacks.
THE BILL OF RIGHTS
Amendment I
Congress shall make no law
respecting an establishment of religion, or prohibiting the free exercise
thereof; or abridging the freedom of speech, or of the press; or the right of
the people peaceably to assemble, and to petition the government for a redress
of grievances.
Amendment X
The powers not delegated to the
United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are
reserved to the States respectively, or
to the people.
These facts remove all
controversy from the matter at hand, thus meaning there is no longer any
recourse to a court of law since this NOTICE CEASE AND DESIST, is a PRIMA FACIE
CASE. This Notice to Cease and Desist addresses the crimes and violation of
OATHS of all subordinate public servants acting under your supervision and
includes specifically, all identified in This Notice to Cease and Desist by
their ignoring their moral and fiduciary duty. The following stare decisis
apply; Hafer v. Melo, 502 US 21 (1991): “US Supreme Court held that state
officials acting by ”color of law” may be held
personally liable for the injuries or torts they cause and that official or
sovereign immunity may not be asserted.”; Scheuer v. Rhodes, 416 US 232 (1974),
94 S. Ct. 1683, 1687 (1974), “When a state officer acts under a state law in a
manner violative of the Federal Constitution, he comes into conflict with the
superior authority of that Constitution, and he is in that case stripped of his official or
representative character and is subjected in his person to the consequences of
his individual conduct. The State has no power to impart to him any immunity
from responsibility to the supreme authority of the United States.”; Warnock v
Pecos County, Texas, 116 F. 3d 776 – No.96-50869 Summary Calendar. July 3,
1997.
In the Western world and many
Eastern countries, each of us was born into the world with a bounty on our
heads. This is due to the fact that our federal government considers us as
enemies of the state. According to Judge Dale, author of The Great American
Adventure: The Secrets of America, if you live in the United States, the act
that makes you an enemy of the U.S. federal government is “The Trading with the
Enemy Act.” This act was amended by Franklin D. Roosevelt in March 1933.
Even though you are considered an
enemy of the corporate government, it actually has no jurisdiction over you as a living man or woman. However, if you
agree to be a citizen of your corporate government, then it has jurisdiction
over you. For example, to be a United States citizen means that you are an
“employee” of the United States which is a corporation. If you want evidence of
this, look at subsection 14 & 15 in Title 28 U.S. Code § 3002 and you
should see this phrase “”(14) “State”
means any of the several States, the District of Columbia, the Commonwealth
of Puerto Rico, the Commonwealth of the Northern Marianas, or any territory or
possession of the United States.
(15) “United States” means—
(A) a Federal corporation;
(B) an agency, department, commission, board, or other entity of the
United States; or
(C) an instrumentality of the United States””
https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/28/3002
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)