Friday, June 28, 2013

SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY: PLEASE TRY TO RECALL THE IMPLICIT WISDOM OF 1950’s ROCK ‘n ROLL HIT: ”STEP BY STEP WE ..

SECRETARY OF STATE JOHN KERRY: PLEASE TRY TO RECALL THE IMPLICIT WISDOM OF 1950’s ROCK ‘n ROLL HIT: ”STEP BY STEP WE ..
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 28-Jun-2013 05:42:37
... FELL IN LOVE…..”
In Sunday’s NY Times article entitled “Following A Star, Kerry Applies Personal Touch” by Michael Gordon, the journalist captures the frenetic, disheveled approach of the new Sec State.
In essence, Kerry will attempt to solve three major foreign policy crises in one single frenetic stroke based principally on his ‘personal touch’, whatever that means?

As if the Palestinian-Israeli issue were not enough, Kerry also decided to break the “Gordonian Knot” on the Syrian Crises while at the same time ‘laying to rest’ the problems of Afghanistan and the Taliban.
Whew!!
I was exhausted after reading that article. I was truly in awe of ex-Sen John Kerry whose bloated sense of self has never impeded his lack of accomplishments.

But this threesome of Syria, Israel-Palestine and Afghanistan makes me wonder if wishful thinking hasn’t become pandemic in the Obama administration.
I think the most sagacious, prescient words were spoken by a statesman, Strobe Talbott, whom I have long admired and thought that he should have been the SecState several administrations ago.
Here is what Strobe, the head of the State Department’s Foreign Affairs Board and President of the Brookings Institution said about this administrations confusing foreign policy:
“If you are really going to pivot to Asia, you cannot leave the Middle East in flames. With regard to Egypt, the Arab-Israel Peace process, Syria, Iraq and Iran---all that has to be manageable”.

Who's is going to tell Kerry it ‘ain’t so’?
Kerry believes that his “personal charm” or “charisma” or “aura”—call it whatever you may want! For “self-delusion” is the privilege of the “privileged class” of which Kerry wants everyone to understand---‘he was born and bred to become SecState.’
As someone who happened to fall upon the good fortune to have served four Sec States, I can say from having been intimately involved in the Camp David Peace Accords and Paris Peace Conference on Cambodia, humility, strategy and strong leadership are all the prerequisites to a successful treaty.
BTW, at best one can only really hope to obtain one treaty at a time in one administration at a time.
The Camp David Peace Accords can be attributed to the quiet, forceful, perseverance of a President Jimmy Carter and his Sec State Cyrus Vance.
There was no grandstanding allowed!

Very talented FSOs like Frank Wisner, Chas Freeman, and many other career national security professionals from the CIA to the military were all involved in one concerted major effort to insure that Menachem Begin could trust Anwar Sadat to relinquish the Sinai in return for an ethereal peace.
Carter did it. How? To this day, it’s still a mystery to me and I think the foreign policy community as well.
Carter had none of the charisma, charm or ‘aura’ that Kerry attributes to himself. But Carter was modest, sincere, persevering and quiet.

There was no braggadocio about him or his professional team.
Also Carter never left the WH, and assigned the work to Cyrus Vance, discreet, modest, stately, and effective.

Jump decades later to an initiative that was started by Dr Richard Solomon as Assistant Sec State for East Asia and the Pacific, to bring peace to the war-torn South East Asia area--- and if possible bring some form of ‘democracy’ into Cambodia.
Solomon was supported again by a very discreet, incredibly modest but very forceful SecState James Baker.
For the most part, Sec State like Kissinger could run the entire State Dept with only three people. But he allowed the FSO’s to participate in some of his foreign policy endeavors.
But again, Sec State Kerry, everything that was done in Cambodia was done ‘step by step’. First an idea, next planning. Then strategies and tactics were developed with back-up plans. But throughout the entire three year process, not one word of ‘wishful thinking’ or ‘self-delusion’ was even tolerated.
Ergo, the Cambodian Peace Treaty was the only treaty that Sec State James Baker has presided over in his tenure.

So what’s the moral?
Shut your mouth!!
If you think that you can charm Putin, then I will be the first one to buy you a Tsarist War Bond.

I may not know Putin personally but I do know his genetic code—Stassi, KGB, FSB, and LEADER OF THE RUSSIAN FEDERATION.
Please, Sec State Kerry, I want to see this ‘slight of hand’!
As for your ability to charm, the opthamologist Alawite leader, Bashar Assad, I really want to see that!
Bashar’s genetic code has been tried and tested in the infernos of Hafez Assad, as ruthless and cunning a warlord as I have ever had the pleasure not to meet.
But I have met the Assad regime interrogation units, and they are very, very effective in what they have to do. I did not discover anyone who had a scintillating personality or could be convinced of reason.

They pretty much held to the Maoist philosophy that “all power comes from the guns”.
Hey, if you can stop their bullets with your smile, logic and gift of persuasion---go for it, Superman!!!!
I have also fought against the Salafists, and if you can charm those rascals, good luck!
As for me, I am regressing back to the wisdom of the inane words of that one hit wonder—“Step By Step, we feel in love…”
After thirty years in national security, I found that dealing with one problem at a time was more than enough.
But claiming that you can deal with all the problems at the same time seems to me a ‘bit grandiose’ and ‘defensive’.
In other words, if you don’t accomplish one successfully, then all bets are off.
It’s called ‘a rationalization’ for FAILURE.

Good luck JK! I am sure that your ex-FSO father would be proud of you.
If your father can’t love you as much you do yourself, than who can?
My last Churchill quote for a while (promise) but it was Winston Churchill who said:
“The greatest lesson in life is to know that even fools are right sometimes.”

Posted by Steve Pieczenik at 10:59 AM
at
https://stevepieczenik.com/talks/blog.html
---
All images at the source.
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com



OK, TO SIMPLIFY: EVEN JORDAN GETS SUSPICIOUS AS US EXPANDS MILITARY PRESENCE IN KINGDOM

OK, TO SIMPLIFY: EVEN JORDAN GETS SUSPICIOUS AS US EXPANDS MILITARY PRESENCE IN KINGDOM
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 28-Jun-2013 06:04:34
 
Jordanians Suspicious as US Expands Military Presence in Kingdom
Local Editor

Jordanians are suspicious as the United States is deploying troops and weapons in the Kingdom.
A US defense official has told Agence France Presse (AFP) that WashingtUS troops during a military exercise this month near Amman.on has expanded its military presence in the country to 1,000 troops.
"Jordanians do not feel comfortable about the presence of US troops, weapons and equipment in the kingdom," analyst Oraib Rintawi, who runs the Al-Quds Centre for Political Studies, told AFP.
"For Jordanians, the US military presence is linked to plots and conspiracies against their neighbors, which would impact the country itself."
Washington claims it is worried about the security of Jordan, which is already struggling to cope with around 550,000 refugees from its war-torn northern neighbor, Syria. It has kept F-16 warplanes and Patriot missiles in the country since a joint military exercise ended on June 20.
"For the Americans, protecting that stability is key and at the core of their strategy in the Middle East,” Rintawi added.
"But public opinion here does not welcome the Americans, even if they say they want to protect the country."

Earlier this week, Wall Street Journal quoted diplomats and US officials as saying that the Central Intelligence Agency has begun moving weapons to Jordan from a network of secret warehouses and plans to start arming foreign-backed militants fighting the Syrian government.
The diplomats and the US officials said that Washington plans to provide training, small arms, ammunition, and possibly certain types of antitank missiles.
Last week, Jordanian Prime Minister Abdullah Nsur denied a Los Angeles Times report that the Central Intelligence Agency and US special forces have been training Syria armed groups at a new American desert base in southwest Jordan.
"There is no training in our country whatsoever of Syrian opposition forces... the only Syrians we are dealing with in our country are refugees," he told journalists.
Source: AFP
28-06-2013 - 12:13 Last updated 28-06-2013 - 12:13 | 189
http://www.almanar.com.lb/english/adetails.php?eid=99359&cid=31&fromval=1&frid=31&seccatid=91&s1=1
---
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com



THIS ALSO IMPLIES THAT ISRAELI DID NOT BLOW UP FUKUSHIMA

THIS ALSO IMPLIES THAT ISRAELI DID NOT BLOW UP FUKUSHIMA
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 28-Jun-2013 06:35:25
But those who caused tsunami with a nuke.
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com



Catholic clergy are issued Order to Comply, ---Check it out !!!!!!

 Thought you would be interested in this, it talks about, "Common Law Court".  Irvin

 Catholic clergy are issued Order to Comply, requiring they take a public oath to protect children and ignore criminal church statutes.  Click below. Be sure to watch the Video's.
The last one, a fellow starts, in a different language



RECORDING LEO EMIL WANTA 27.5 TRILLION

Hi John

Will you please post this on your website, it's a recoding of Leo Emil Wanta---- himself giving live events, as to what's happened to him.

Recording from June 20th/2013. Lets bring this man the justice he deserves.



http://www.blogtalkradio.com/globalfactradio/2013/06/21/conscious-living-with-guest-ambassador-leo-emil-wanta    Recording from the radio show Leo Emil Wanta   27.5 Trillion where did it go?

Vietnam Devalues Dong for First Time Since December 2011


Vietnam Devalues Dong for First Time Since December 2011

Vietnam’s central bank devalued its currency for the first time since 2011 and cut the interest-rate cap on dollar deposits to help “improve” the balance of payments and boost foreign-exchange reserves.
The State Bank of Vietnam weakened its reference rate by 1 percent to 21,036 dong per dollar, effective today, according to a statement released yesterday. The currency, which can trade as much as 1 percent either side of the rate, fell 0.9 percent to 21,205 as of 4:57 p.m. at banks in Hanoi, the most since Aug. 9, 2011, according to data compiled by Bloomberg. The fixing has been kept at 20,828 since Dec. 26, 2011, and the spot rate touched a record 21,036, the lower limit of the band, on most days in June.
A stack of Vietnamese 500,000 dong notes are displayed in Hanoi, Vietnam. Photographer: Jerome Ming/Bloomberg
June 24 (Bloomberg) -- Kevin Snowball, co-founder and chief executive officer of PXP Vietnam Asset Management, talks about the nation's stocks and investment strategy. Snowball also discusses Myanmar's growth. He speaks in Hong Kong with Rishaad Salamat on Bloomberg Television's "On the Move." (Source: Bloomberg)
The change in the reference rate is the biggest since a record 8.5 percent cut in February 2011 and comes after the government announced yesterday that imports exceeded exports by $1.4 billion in the first half of this year. The economyexpanded 4.9 percent in the first six months from a year earlier, official data show. The government’s full-year growth target of 5.5 percent “will be extremely difficult to meet,” Do Thuc, head of the General Statistics Office, said yesterday in Hanoi.
“The trade balance has swung back into deficit,” Tim Condon, head of Asian research at ING Groep NV in Singapore, wrote in a note today. “Devaluation is the standard policy response when this happens.”

Bond Fell

Vietnam’s government bonds fell today, with the benchmark five-year yield rising 10 basis points, or 0.1 percentage point, to 8.05 percent, according to a daily fixing from banks compiled by Bloomberg. The three-year yield climbed six basis points to 7.23 percent.
The Southeast Asian nation’s economy expanded 5 percent last year, the slowest since 1999, according to government data, after growing 5.9 percent in 2011 and 6.8 percent in 2010
The central bank bought $18 billion to boost its foreign-exchange reserves in 2012, Saigon Times reported Feb. 21, citing Governor Nguyen Van Binh. A further $3.18 billion was purchased in the first quarter of 2013, lifting holdings to the equivalent of 12 weeks of imports, VnEconomy reported April 26, citing a report by State Bank of Vietnam.
The reference rate’s adjustment is “to more accurately reflect the supply and demand of foreign currency in the market” and to “create stability,” the central bank said in the statement. Consumer prices rose 6.69 percent in June from a year earlier, the most since February, official data show.

Deposit Caps

“One key risk is that a pickup in inflation and concerns about further devaluation could intensify dollarization pressures, leading to a self-fulfilling VND depreciation spiral,” Vishnu Varathan, a Singapore-based economist at Mizuho Corporate Bank Ltd., wrote in a research note today.
The central bank cut the cap on corporate dollar deposits to 0.25 percent from 0.5 percent for all tenors and reduced the limit for household savings to 1.25 percent from 2 percent, the regulator said on its website yesterday.
The maximum rate for dong deposits was also lowered to spur spending and investment, the central bank said in the statement. The ceiling for deposits of less than one month fell to 1.2 percent from 2 percent, while that for periods of up to six months declined to 7 percent from 7.5 percent.
The rate-cap reductions are intended “to curb deposit and lending rates at reasonable levels to help stabilize the money market and the foreign-currency market and to continue implementing measures to help resolve difficulties for businesses and production,” the central bank said in the statement. “Businesses and production still have a lot of difficulties because consumption in the market is still at low levels and companies’ ability to absorb bank loans is still limited.”
To contact Bloomberg News staff for this story: Nguyen Dieu Tu Uyen in Hanoi atuyen1@bloomberg.net

"‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP sieze guns from High River homes"

Reader, link: "‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP sieze guns from High River homes"
Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 27-Jun-2013 23:36:43


(Thanks, L. :)
Reader Lance writes:
***************************************************************************
New Orleans in Alberta
‘Hell to pay:’ Residents angry as RCMP sieze guns from High River homes
'It’s just like Nazi Germany,’ says resident

http://www.calgaryherald.com/news/alberta/RCMP+seized+High+River+firearms+from+homes+control+situation/8588851/story.html
Hey Hobie:
I wonder if they (the RCMP...and you know how I feel about them!) broke into peoples gun safes/cabinets. Most gun owners I know (mostly everyone) keep their firearms in locked cabinets of some sort. SOmethings fishy here...
Cheers
***************************************************************************
http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=280994

WHEN YOU HAVE PRES W/O EDUCATION OF ANY SORT: PRESIDENT OBAMA: FRACKED GAS IS NOT A SOLUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE

WHEN YOU HAVE PRES W/O EDUCATION OF ANY SORT: PRESIDENT OBAMA: FRACKED GAS IS NOT A SOLUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE
Posted By: IZAKOVIC [Send E-Mail]
Date: Friday, 28-Jun-2013 05:19:46
 
June 26th, 2013
PRESIDENT OBAMA: FRACKED GAS IS NOT A SOLUTION TO CLIMATE CHANGE


http://www.foodandwaterwatch.org/blogs/president-obama-fracked-gas-is-not-a-solution-to-climate-change/
By Mark Schlosberg
I watched with anticipation yesterday as President Obama delivered his speech laying out his new climate action plan. Climate change is one of the most pressing issue of our time, and one on which the United States desperately needs to lead. While it was heartening to hear the President take on climate deniers and pledge to fight the problem, his full-throated advocacy for fracked natural gas and oil was more a case of two steps back than a giant step forward.
A major pillar of the President’s climate action plan is increased production and use of domestic fracked natural gas – and it wasn’t just gas – he also lauded increased domestic oil production. While Obama didn’t use the word “fracking,” that is the method used to extract gas and oil in communities across the country. He repeatedly referred to “clean burning natural gas” and lauded it as a “bridge fuel.” But if our goal is stemming climate change, fracked gas is a bridge to nowhere. It’s true that we need to identify new sources of energy, but we can’t drill away our energy problems.
Studies show that the process of drilling, fracking, processing and transporting natural gas releases a tremendous amount of methane into the air. Methane is 70-100 times more potent of a greenhouse gas than carbon dioxide over a 20-year time frame. Some recently published studies on methane emissions show that burning natural gas may be even worse, in terms of the overall greenhouse gas footprint, than burning coal for electricity and burning fuel oil to heat homes or run industrial boilers. A massive expansion of fracking threatens to undo any gains from other parts of his plan and may make matters even worse. For an excellent video on the intersection between fracking and climate change, check out this great explanation by Cornell Professor, Tony Ingraffea.
There is a strong and growing movement against fracking – not just because of its documented impact on water, air and communities, but also because it is a driver of climate change. Americans Against Fracking, a national coalition to ban fracking has over 200 organizational members and vibrant state based coalitions pushing for a ban in New York, Colorado, California and elsewhere. People across the country are growing to understand what climate scientists have said for years—that we must leave our fossil fuels in the ground to avert climate change.
When I heard Obama talking about boosting the development of natural gas and oil yesterday, I got angry, but then I got energized. I got energized by the tens of thousands of people in New York pushing Governor Cuomo to ban fracking; I got energized by the amazing organizing in Pennsylvania and California to move the Democratic Party to endorse moratoriums on fracking; and I got energized by the people in Boulder County, Colorado who won an 18 month moratorium on fracking.
Our movement is growing and our elected officials have not caught up to their constituents. It’s critical that we pressure President Obama to listen to the science and to this growing movement against fracking for oil and gas. We also need to continue to hold him accountable for decisions he is making that contribute to climate change. His Interior Department’s Bureau of Land Management, for example, is facing critical decisions about fracking on public lands and his administration is also making key decisions on liquefied natural gas exports, pipeline projects and other infrastructure projects.
Take action now to tell President Obama that fracked gas and oil is not part of any climate solution.
--
10 Comments on President Obama: Fracked Gas is Not a Solution to Climate Change
Deborah Gordillo says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:02 PM
Please address the very serious issue of climate change with a more serious response than fracking. This is just about as toxic and damaging to the climate as it can be. What we need to develop are solar, wind, and geothermal energies. This can all be done. There are many regions across the nation that can use enormous amounts of solar and wind alone. This is where we should be putting our focus.
Please don’t have a hand in the end of the world. Please abandon fracking once and for all. Please do the right thing by future generations, and that includes your own children.
Reply
Colette says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:04 PM
We ALL NEED clean air, water and food!! It’s as simple as that! It’s time to do what’s right for ALL of us!
Reply
Laura Haney says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:09 PM
Fracked gas and oil is a climate disaster. I saw parts of Texas when the oil companies were finished with them. It was acres and acres of bare earth where there had been trees and wildlife. It took YEARS for even weeds to grow. Fifteen years later, it’s sbetter but it is not back to normal. Clearing land on that scale is bad for the environment. And I haven’t even touched on what it did to the water supply and the effect it had on people ‘s health.
Fracking is bad. No ifs, ands or buts.
Reply
Deborah Escobar says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:10 PM
Fracking is not the solution, it is part of the problem. Please educate yourself about what the fracking industry has done to small towns and citizens across this great nation. Watch Gasland or Gasland2 documentary. Read the positions of renowned scientists who are alarmed about the risks fracking poses to our health, air, water, food. Protect the farming communities from the scarcity of water that will be created by fracking – wasting trillions of tons of water, one of our most valuable resources lost forever because the water cannot be reclaimed once contaminated by fracking chemicals and radioactivity. PLEASE listen, because this is crucial! Thank you for not turning away from the problem.
Reply
Nell Wade says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:24 PM
Dear President Obama:
WOW, I waited with anticipation regarding the climate change bill, but alas, as with both parties, it’s always ‘too little, too late’. And your push for natural gas?? Water is MORE PRECIOUS than any fossil fuel and you’re allowing corporations to not only take our water, but destroy it before giving it back to us. Are you in kahoots with Big Pharma? After all, cancer has been on the rise for years in this country and we know it’s primarily environmentally caused. I’m disappointed in your fracking allowance, but thankful that renewable energy will get a shot in the arm. I won’t be voting for any Republican OR Democrat next election time, because I feel BOTH parties have let the American People down. Sadly, a former Democrat
Reply
Deborah Gordillo says:
June 26, 2013 at 5:35 PM
Well said. I wish more people realized that while the Republicans are fighting with the Democrats, 99% of the politicians from both sides are together totally screwing this country. The one senator who truly stands with the American people is Bernie Sanders, and big surprise: he’s neither Republican nor Democrat.
Reply
Betsy C Spada says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:26 PM
Fracking should be immediately banned in the USA. It destroys aquifers and requires billions of gallons of water in the process which can never be reclaimed. There is NO GOOD REASON to continue this poisonous process. Please be the leader I voted for and do not be bought by the greed of the gas industry.
Reply
Christina Deeds says:
June 26, 2013 at 3:52 PM
While fracking may appear to be a good alternative for fuel resources, it is a losing proposition when environmental impact is taken into consideration. Even as you are reviewing this, investors are outbidding farmers for excess water rights. When our farmers can’t harvest their crops or raise their livestock, what will we do for food?
And do not forget to consider the damage done to the actual ground. Poisonous chemicals are leeched into the ground water and disbursed into the air. Minor earthquakes are a common occurrence. Many of the fracking sites shown in the media have looked very desolate and inhospitable.
As I understand, the EPA is working on a comprehensive fracking report, scheduled to be completed in 2014. At the minimum, please consider holding off any action until the report has been completed. If possible, ask the EPA to step up their conclusions. And since the EPA has been investigating fracking since at least 2002, there should be significant information included so an informed opinion can be made.
Reply
Laird Craig says:
June 26, 2013 at 5:19 PM
Dear Mr. President,
Thank you for addressing climate change. Please educate yourself on real solutions to this largest of all predicaments that we have created. I recommend UC Berkeley’s Environmental Science, Policy & Management course. The truth that you will discover is that we must immediately stop burning fossil fuels. Hydraulic fracturing is sublimely lethal. Ban it tomorrow, if you have the power.
Please keep in mind that if we stopped burning all fossil fuels today that it will still take 500 years to mend the damages.
Respectfully submitted,
Your friend Laird
Reply
Lisa Duggan says:
June 27, 2013 at 12:12 PM
Mr. President,
No hydraulic fracking, not in Monterey County, not anywhere near a water source or where people want to live and enjoy a good long life.
That is it.
Thank you for supporting life,
Lisa Duggan
---
Why fracking?
Cause Trilatelar commission is behind schedule, and this was the only way to delay US $ premature collapse. I.e. to have gas much cheaper then EU has (gets it from Russia only, that is why Arab spring was used - to kill its North African source, Cyprus was pushed to bankcrupcy and Turkey got that park problem).
Yes, I write this with reserve because I cannot fathom that trilaterals are that stupid (irresponsible - nein, other Universe).
IZAKOVIC
http://www.deepspace4.com