Protocol Update plus More

Tom Heneghan explosive intelligence briefings ALL patriot Americans MUST know, with sources inside American/European intelligence agencies and INTERPOL, reporting what is really going on behind the scenes of the corporate-controlled, fascist, extortion-friendly propaganda U.S. media's massive deceptions
Thursday January 17, 2012

Protocol Update plus More
by Tom Heneghan 

International Intelligence Expert


IMF President Christine Lagarde

UNITED States of America - It can now be reported that the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and Austrian banks are in direct communication with U.S. Treasury Secretary-designate Jack Lew regarding the finalization of the bilateral tax agreement between the IMF, Austrian banks and the U.S. Treasury aka the final implementation of the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols.

At this hour, IMF President Christine Lagarde, along with European INTERPOL, have frozen IMF proprietary accounts tied to the Central Bank of Australia that are currently manipulating the spread between the Japanese yen and the Australian dollar in a FOREX ponzi scheme that continues to illegally use Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand funds in violation of the IMF and U.S. Supreme Court order.
 At this hour, we can happily report that IMF President Christine Lagarde has forced the rogue German Deutsche bank to return the missing soviet gold tied to the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand Protocols directly to its legal recipient, the French Treasury.

Accordingly, Protocol implementation remains imminent.

P.S. Do not believe the latest U.S. housing statistics. The crooked U.S. banks are just flipping foreclosed U.S. properties with each other and are still unable, because of the toxic derivatives on their books, to loan money to middle class applicants.

P.P.S. In closing we bring you a media whore alert.  The current corporate fascist, extortion friendly, anti Catholic, U.S. media smear against the University of Notre Dame is an attempt to disguise an escalating scandal involving the Southeastern Football Conference and the use by the majority of their athletes of illegal steroids that are banned by the NCAA.

We can also report that the Southeastern Football Conference, which is now dominated by African-American athletes, are allowed to remain eligible for football competition even though they are carrying a scholastic D average.

Note: The exception is Louisiana State University, which is still graduating over 87% of their football players.

This is the same Southeastern Football Conference that, as recently as 40 years ago, had a problem with African-Americans even attending their universities.

So the question now is: Have these African-American athletes in the Southeastern Football Conference, who are carrying a D average, become bought and paid for slaves on behalf of their white slave masters.

Finally, CNN and MSNBC should investigate this massive scandal.

In closing, stay tuned for future intelligence briefings, which will finger Archer Financial Services and the crooked Chicago-based Harris Bank in receiving electronic spread sheets that indicate open option positions in both the cattle and hog futures markets that Archer Financial Services have written.

This, folks, is total fraud on behalf of the criminal banks who have now illegally become counter parties to the commodity exchanges aka the CME Group.

Cosby - Right On Again!

They're standing on the corner and they can't speak English.

I can't even talk the way these people talk:

Why you ain't,
Where you is,
What he drive,
Where he stay,
Where he work,
Who you be...

And I blamed the kid until I heard the mother talk.

And then I heard the father talk.

Everybody knows it's important to speak English except these knuckleheads. You can't be a doctor with that kind of crap coming out of your mouth.

In fact you will never get any kind of job making a decent living.

People marched and were hit in the face with rocks to get an Education, and now we've got these knuckleheads walking around.

The lower economic people are not holding up their end in this deal.

These people are not parenting. They are buying things for kids.

$500 sneakers for what?

And they won't spend $200 for Hooked on Phonics.

I am talking about these people who cry when their son is standing there in an orange suit.

Where were you when he was 2?

Where were you when he was 12?

Where were you when he was 18 and how come you didn't know that he had a pistol?

And where is the father? Or who is his father?

People putting their clothes on backward:
Isn't that a sign of something gone wrong?

People with their hats on backward, pants down around the crack, isn't that a sign of something?

Isn't it a sign of something when she has her dress all the way up and got all type of needles [piercing] going through her body?

What part of Africa did this come from??

We are not Africans. Those people are not Africans; they don't know a thing about Africa ....... 

I say this all of the time. It would be like white people saying they are European-American. That is totally stupid.

I was born here, and so were my parents and grand parents and, very likely my great grandparents. I don't have any connection to Africa, no more than white Americans have to Germany , Scotland , England , Ireland , or the Netherlands . The same applies to 99 percent of all the black Americans as regards to Africa ... So stop, already! ! !

With names like Shaniqua, Taliqua and Mohammed and all of that crap .......... And all of them are in jail.

Brown or black versus the Board of Education is no longer the white person's problem.

We have got to take the neighborhood back.

People used to be ashamed. Today a woman has eight children with eight different 'husbands' -- or men or whatever you call them now.

We have millionaire football players who cannot read.

We have million-dollar basketball players who can't write two paragraphs. We, as black folks have to do a better job.

Someone working at Wal-Mart with seven kids, you are hurting us.

We have to start holding each other to a higher standard..

We cannot blame the white people any longer.'
Dr.. William Henry 'Bill' Cosby, Jr., Ed..D.

WELL SAID, BILL

It's NOT about color... It's about behavior! PASS THIS ON AROUND THE WORLD!!!!!! 

 

To the Patriots: Arm Yourselves, for the Hammer's Crashing Down

Quick Links Oath Keepers Site Join Oath Keepers National And State Chapter Forums Donate Contact Oath Keepers Youtube Facebook Twitter To the Patriots: Arm Yourselves, for the Hammer's Crashing Down In this dark hour, when liberty is under such relentless assault, it is necessary for you to steel yourselves, and arm yourselves, spiritually, mentally, and physically.  And above all, it is a time to set aside fear, and to reject despair and to embrace our place in history.  We were born as Americans, at this time, for a reason, and it was not to cower in fear or to dissolve into a gelatinous mass of despair.  We were born free men and women, and we will die free men and women.  No one gets out of here alive anyway, and in the end, all that matters is that our children and grand-children are free.  Everything else is a side-show. To put us in the right frame of mind, I present to you the powerful song "Arm Yourselves" by my good friend Jordan Page.  Arm Yourselves is a call to action for every free American to stand up for their Constitutionally protected right to bear arms.  In one of his most powerful songs to date, Jordan Page warns us all that "the hammer is crashing down" and that now is the time to show solidarity that we, the people, will not be disarmed by any government or authority. The song paints a striking picture of a possible future scenario where the free people of America clash with the force of totalitarian government. Watch the Video and read the lyrics Here: http://oathkeepers.org/oath/2013/01/17/to-the-patriots-arm-yourselves-for-the-hammer%E2%80%99s-crashing-down/ ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ SUPPORT OUR BILLBOARD CAMPAIGN Placing billboards outside of military bases to remind service members of their oath SUPPORT OUR LIBERTY TOUR Free music concerts for the troops, with direct outreach to them about their oath You do not need to be prior service to join Oath Keepers. All Patriotic Citizens are invited to join as an Associate Member.    Please donate and support Oath Keepers mission, every little bit helps! Support Operation Sleeping Giant, Join Oath Keepers and get involved. Operation Sleeping Giant Join Oath Keepers Oath Keepers is growing FAST, but like General Patton, we are outpacing our own supply lines. Your donations are "fuel" for our advance! If you would like to support the Oath Keepers vital mission to teach the current serving about their oath and about the Constitution so they will stand firm and do what is right, and our second mission to remind veterans of their oath and obligations.: Please click the PayPal image below to donate.   If you would like to mail your donation: Make checks payable to: OathKeepers Mail to: Oath Keepers 5130 S. Fort Apache suite 215 Las Vegas, NV 89148  This email was sent from an unmonitored email address. If you wish to contact us, please use the contact form on the contact page of our website. http://oathkeepers.org/oath/contact/

Two More Obama Cabinet Members Stepping Down

Two More Obama Cabinet Members Stepping Down

Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Thursday, 17-Jan-2013 14:55:50

. Secretary of the Interior Ken Salazar stepping down

Interior Secretary Ken Salazar, who led the response to the 2010 BP oil spill and administered a moratorium on offshore drilling, announced Wednesday that he is stepping down.
The former Colorado lawmaker plans to return home in March after eight turbulent and busy years in Washington, four years in the U.S. Senate and four years as head of the Interior Department.
President Obama nominated him for the Cabinet post four years ago and he was unanimously confirmed.
He was most prominent when he spearheaded the administration reaction to the BP Deepwater Horizon drilling rig explosion and oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico.
Salazar issued a six-month drilling moratorium after the April 20, 2010, explosion.
Critics, including Republican leaders, Gulf state officials and Gulf Coast residents, slammed the ban. They said it would hurt oil and gas workers in the already hard-hit coastal communities, where hundreds of jobs were lost because of the disaster.
But Salazar said the moratorium provided time to make sure that similar accidents wouldn't occur and that rig operators were prepared to deal with worst-case scenarios if they did happen again.
Eleven people died in the explosion, which spawned one of the worst environmental disasters in U.S. history. An estimated 4.9 million barrels of oil gushed into the Gulf before the broken well some 4,000 feet below the surface was capped.
More here: http://www.cnn.com/2013/01/16/politics/salazar-resigning/index.html
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Energy Secretary Chu Said to Plan Departure From Cabinet

U.S. Energy Secretary Steven Chu, who drew criticism from Republicans over his support for loans to Solyndra LLC before the solar-panel maker went bankrupt, will leave his Cabinet post in President Barack Obama’s second term, according to two people familiar with the matter.

Chu’s departure will be announced as soon as next week, according to one of the people. Both requested anonymity to discuss personnel matters that haven’t been announced. The people didn’t identify potential replacements.

The exit will leave the Obama administration with vacancies at the top of the three departments that oversee energy and environmental policy. Interior Secretary Ken Salazar and Lisa Jackson, who headed the Environmental Protection Agency, have announced their intention to leave the administration.

Chu, 64, was a career scientist and co-winner of the Nobel Prize for physics when he joined the Cabinet in January 2009. Supporters said Chu brought a fresh perspective to discussions often dominated by politics in Washington.

More here: http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-01-17/energy-secretary-chu-said-to-plan-departure-from-cabinet.html

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=266708

TWO SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THE ANTI-GUNNERS DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE

TWO SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THE ANTI-GUNNERS DON’T WANT YOU TO SEE by jcscuba Jim Campbell, Citizen Journalist, Oath Keeper, and Patriot. As anti-gun zealots like Dianne Feinstein and others of her Marxist ilk continually do, they deceive.  By continually calling in error assault weapons which are in fact semi-automatic weapons, and not fully automatic as she continually describes, she may have doomed her proposed legislation. Please visit, "SO WHAT IS AN ‘ASSAULT RIFLE’ REALLY? WE LOOK AT THE DEFINITIONS AND HOW THE TERM IS ‘DEMONIZED’' The two cases decided by the Supreme Court below would seem to blow Feinstein's and Obama's position out of the water. That she does! When they aren't busy deceiving We the People they tend to leave out factual relevant facts which don't fit their agenda.  Are there any members of the media willing to do some hard journalism and provide us with factual information or will we forever be mired in media cover ups and Government lies.  Not likely to give a rats ass about any assault weapon ban.  Feinstein and the left don't seem to get this concept. That's my story and I'm sticking to it, I'm J.C. and I approve this message. There are two Supreme Court rulings that directly relate to the current anti-Assault Weapon issue everyone needs to be reminded of. The first is United States v. Miller 1939. Miller possessed a sawed-off shotgun banned under the National Firearms Act. He argued that he had a right to bear the weapon under the Second Amendment, but the Supreme Court ruled against him. Why? At the time, sawed-off shotguns were not being used in a military application, and the Supreme Court ruled that since it didn't, it was not protected. Even though Miller lost that argument, the Miller case set the precedent that protected firearms have a military, and thus a legitimate and protected Militia use. The military now uses shotguns regularly, but not very short, sawed-off shotguns, but an AR-15/AK-47 type weapon is currently in use by the military, therefore it is a protected weapon for the Unorganized Militia, which includes just about every American citizen now that both age and sex discrimination are illegal. (The original Militia included men of age 17-45) Therefore any firearm that is applicable to military use is clearly protected under Article II, and that includes all those nasty-looking semi-automatic black rifles, including full 30 round magazines. The second important case is that of John Bad Elk v. United States from 1900. In that case, an attempt was made to arrest Mr. Bad Elk without probable cause, and Mr. Bad Elk killed a policeman who was attempting the false arrest. Bad Elk had been found guilty and sentenced to death. However, the Supreme Court ruled that Bad Elk had the right to use any force, including lethal force, to prevent his false arrest, even if the policeman was only trying to arrest him and not kill him. Basically, the Supremes of the day ruled that as a citizen, you have the right to defend against your civil rights being violated using ANY force necessary to prevent the violation, even if the offending party isn't trying to kill you. Both of these cases are standing law to this day. The Miller decision clearly includes AR-15/AK-47 type weapons as having a military application. The Bad Elk decision means that if the government tries to confiscate your AR-15/AK-47, or arrest you for having one, you can kill the offenders on the spot, even if they are not trying to kill you. I didn't make these decisions; the United States Supreme Court did. jcscuba | January 17, 2013 at 9:07 AM | Tags: Criminals will not give up weapons, Elk v. United States from 1900, The Supreme Court has Upheld Assault weapons, United States v. Miller 1939m Concervative blog network | Categories: TWO SUPREME COURT DECISIONS THE ANTI-GUNNERS DON'T WANT YOU TO SEE | URL: http://wp.me/pG2rx-jab Comment    See all comments

Either Disobey The Constitution Or Disobey Illegal Executive Orders

Either Disobey The Constitution Or Disobey Illegal Executive Orders, Its That Simple: 50 Sovereign State Flags vs One Federal Flag!

16Jan

The 50 Flags Of the Governing States Fly High In The National Cathedral. On March 31, 1968, the Rev. Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., preached his last Sunday sermon at the 50 States National Cathedral. A memorial service for King was held in the 50 States National Cathedral five days later.

The Federal Government Possesses Only Those Powers Delegated To It By The States.

“State a moral case to a plowman and a professor. The former will decide it well and often better than the latter, because he has not been led astray by artificial rules.”

– President Thomas Jefferson

Founding Father James Madison

The powers delegated by the proposed Constitution to the Federal Government are few and defined. Those which are to remain in the State Governments are numerous and indefinite. The former will be exercised principally on external objects, as war, peace negotiation, and foreign commerce;…The powers reserved to the several states will extend to all the objects, which, in the ordinary course of affairs, concern the lives, liberties and properties of the people, and the internal order, improvement, and prosperity of the state. Federalist Papers No. 45

1. Obama’s XXXecutive Order Scheme: The Exorcism Of Barry Soetoro ~ Impeachment.

The state legislatures have a duty and moral obligation to resist Obama’s illegal executive orders, to protect the sovereignty of their respective states, and the safety of its people from tyranny.
This is not the Alien and Sedition acts of 1798. We might see a power grab by one man trying to centralize all powers not enumerated to him, to attack the right to keep and bear arms. The States do have many legal remedies if anyone in government has a backbone to stand up. In fact in 1952, the US Supreme Court struck down a power grab by President Truman.

CLICK

The Tenth Amendment expresses the principle that undergirds the entire plan of the original Constitution: the national government possesses only those powers delegated to it.

Does a President have the legal authority to legislate by executive FIAT to get his way when Congress will not?

No he does not.

Read the Kentucky and Virginia Resolutions back when the Alien and Sedition Act was passed back in 1798.
Here is what the resolutions stated and declared:
That this Assembly doth explicitly and peremptorily declare, that it views the powers of the federal government, as resulting from the compact, to which the States are parties; as limited by the plain sense and intention of the instrument constituting the compact; as no further valid that they are authorized by the grants enumerated in that compact; and that in case of a deliberate, palpable, and dangerous exercise of other powers, not granted by the said compact:

The States who are parties thereto, have the right, and are in duty bound, to interpose for arresting the progress of the evil, and for maintaining within their respective limits, the authorities, rights and liberties appertaining to them.

The State legislatures have a duty and moral obligation to resist Obama’s illegal executive orders to protect the sovereignty of their respective States and the safety of its people from tyranny.

In 1952, The US Supreme Court rule against President Harry S. Truman‘s illegal executive order in the case of Youngstown Co vs. Sawyer.

The President signed an executive order to seize the steel mills because a worker strike under the pretense of a steel worker strike is a threat to national security.

Justice Hugo Black in the Majority opinion said:
The mill owners argue that the President’s order amounts to lawmaking, a legislative function which the Constitution has expressly confided to the Congress and not to the President.
Further Saying:
Their complaints charged that the seizure was not authorized by an act of Congress or by any constitutional provisions. The District Court was asked to declare the orders of the President and the Secretary invalid and to issue preliminary and permanent injunctions restraining their enforcement.
The Governments excuse that did not hold water was:
injunction, the United States asserted that a strike disrupting steel production for even a brief period would so endanger the well-being and safety of the Nation that the President had “inherent power” to do what he had done – power “supported by the Constitution, by historical precedent, and by court decisions.” Which was and is today pure hogwash.

Obama Captured

Is putative President Obama making the same excuse under a similar pretext to the response to the incident at Sandy Hook Elementary School saying guns in the hands of the law abiding Americans endangers the well being of the children? Pure illegal window dressing!
So in the putative President’s mind, if congress will not go along. He will use his “inherent illegal powers” to confiscate the guns using the “necessary and proper” clause. The School is a State issue not a Fed issue.
Justice Black continually says restricting the President’s Power writing:

The President’s power, if any, to issue the order must stem either from an act of Congress or from the Constitution itself.

There is no statute that expressly authorizes the President to take possession of property as he did here. Nor is there any act of Congress to which our attention has been directed from which such a power can fairly be implied.
Harry Truman used the color of law without no legal authority. The President only has the power to enforce the laws of Congress. He has no implied powers. His authority is very limited.

This can be Obama’s Waterloo like Napoleon, when he overreached and over extended beyond pushing the limits past his legal constraints. The Chief Justice emphasizes constantly in the majority opinion:

It is clear that if the President had authority to issue the order he did, it must be found in some provision of the Constitution.

And it is not claimed that express Constitutional language grants this power to the President. The contention is that presidential power should be implied from the aggregate of his powers under the Constitution. Particular reliance is placed on provisions in Article II which say that “The executive Power shall be vested in a President . . .”; that “he shall take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed”
Here are further quotes from Justice Hugo Black that are worth noting that the President is not a law onto himself:
Nor can the seizure order be sustained because of the several Constitutional provisions that grant executive power to the President.

In the framework of our Constitution, the President’s power to see that the laws are faithfully executed refutes the idea that he is to be a lawmaker.

The Constitution limits his functions in the lawmaking process to the recommending of laws he thinks wise and the vetoing of laws he thinks bad.
And the Constitution is neither silent nor equivocal about who shall make laws which the President is to execute.

The first section of the first article says that “All legislative Powers herein granted shall be vested in a Congress of the United States . . . .”

After granting many powers to the Congress, Article I goes on to provide that Congress may “make all Laws which shall be necessary and proper for carrying into Execution the foregoing Powers, and all other Powers vested by this Constitution in the Government of the United States, or in any Department or Officer thereof.”

The order cannot properly be sustained as an exercise of the President’s military power as Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces.

The Government attempts to do so by citing a number of cases upholding broad powers in military commanders engaged in day-to-day fighting in a theater of war. Such cases need not concern us here.
Even though “theater of war” be an expanding concept, we cannot with faithfulness to our Constitutional system hold that the Commander in Chief of the Armed Forces has the ultimate power as such to take possession of private property in order to keep labor disputes from stopping production.

This is a job for the Nation’s lawmakers, not for its military authorities.

The President has no statutory or Constitutional authority to sign an executive order to disarm the law abiding American people.
We have allowed the President to get away with way too many power grabs.
But when he says he is coming for the people’s legal and lawfully owned guns. He might get a major push back he may not expect where he will lose everything because he has miscalculated.

The media is talking to itself because no one watches them anymore.

If Obama is a legend in his own mind, thinking his power has no limits, ask Napoleon what happens when he invaded Russia?
He lost big time. Obama will lose big time if he physically tries to confiscate the guns.
It is the duty of the People, The States to stand up.
We can win as long we stand our ground and not give in. We do not need any yellow bellies wavering.
We have the law of the land and the moral authority on our side.
The tyrants are on a foundation made of sand based on lies and hoaxes. We just have to hold the line. They will sink if we hold fast.
We are the final check on power when our leaders fail.
God Speed!
The Lone Star Watchdog

March On Obama 09/12/2009

Obama The Kenyan King Is LIVID Over Gun Control Blowback:

Obama The Kenyan King Is LIVID Over Gun Control Blowback: This Time The People Won And The Commies Lost

Posted By: Watchman
Date: Thursday, 17-Jan-2013 09:28:52

A brief update from a Republican Insider fighting to renew conservative principles and defeat the globalist Big Government liberalism of Barack Obama and his supporters. Like me you were probably watching the president’s gun control speech today. Was told this morning the presentation today was a revised version that was completed just last night after a bunch of back and forth between the White House and Senate leaders. Guessing that would be Harry Reid mostly. Last week the president was ready to go all in on the executive order scenario. Confiscation was going to be in play. Then the backlash came and it forced Obama to back off. He didn’t want to but after Reid said it was a no go, and the NRA was preparing to go to war with the White House, the president was given a revised script and that is what we heard this morning. You could tell too. Obama stumbled over the words more than usual. He didn’t have the time to prep the script like he normally does. Probably fuming he was forced to read the new version also. This time WE WON and OBAMA LOST. If people want to know how to go at the administration, this is how you do it. Be informed, and make your voices heard. This is an example of how the new media I have been telling you about can work against the globalists. It can be a huge weapon against them. And a big thank you to the NRA. It took on Obama and didn’t back off. A big part of the plan coming from the White House was to cripple the NRA and make it a liability for 2014 and beyond. That didn’t work and it will be a liability, but one that is going to hurt Democrats, not conservatives. Big time backfire for the Obama White House. I was told it “rocked them on their heels”. They fundamentally don’t understand the American people and they didn’t see this backlash coming. They have the media, and the glossy presentations, but they don’t really understand the American people and this debate was a pure example of that being played out. I love it! Congrats to the state governments that were willing to voice opposition too. They did that and took on a lot of risk. Heard a list is being made and federal dollars might be taken away from them. Those state leaders knew that could happen but took on the administrationanyways. That’s real leadership and courage being put on display for all of us and voters living in those states need to let those leaders know it is appreciated. You know how I feel about how important the 10th Amendment is, and today was also a big victory for the 10th Amendment against the Obama White House. Now from here it’s clear Obama wants to try and use the issue as leverage for the 2014 midterms. They are hoping they can salvage something out of what became a fiasco for them. I just don’t sense enough Democrats willing to play along on this one though. Apparently the NRA and some other groups were lining up primary challengers to Democrats who went along with the president’s gun control plans and letting those Democrats know it was coming. That scared the heck out of them. Barack Obama is entering his lame duck phase, and the Democrats know it. After 2014 he becomes a museum piece. The president knows that too and it’s really ticking him off. We have to rub that in his face 24/7 while also building the conservative base back up into the kind of powerful entity it should be. When people get involved, and make some noise, they still have the power. Use the new media, contact the lawmakers both state and federal, and talk to the people around you. That is power. That is what makes America so great and that is what happened today. The president had his little moment, and was pretending it meant something, but he said nothing. That 21 (23) point plan or whatever it was, was hollow. It was a gutted version of what he was hoping to do as recently as a few days ago. Instead, he had to roll over and made a weak threat to Congress but that threat starts in the Senate and they already told him to shut up. Obama backed off. He lost this time, and it was all because of the American people. His media will try to spin it as something different, and if he gets another chance, the president will be right back to pushing for confiscation, but for now, we won this particular fight. This victory is a lot bigger than you’ll hear in the regular media. It’s a lot bigger than anyone who stood their ground will ever know about. The Obama White House was trying to go very big on this gun control thing, and couldn’t pull it off. And Barack Obama is livid about it. Like a spoiled brat he can’t believe he had to scrap the original speech for today’s version. Today was a great day for the good guys. Of course, there’s always another fight just around the corner, so we have to be ready. Let your readers know they did a great job on this. Each of them were a part of forcing the president to back off. Let’s do it again! http://theulstermanreport.com/2013/01/16/republican-insider-obama-livid-over-gun-rights-backlash/