Friday, January 6, 2017
The secret Cold War city the US built under ice: Incredible footage reveals the hidden missile base in Greenland that would have destroyed the Soviet Union in minutes
Airport false flag shooting HOAX
Fort Lauderdale, FL airport shooting hoax of January 6, 2017: http://freetofindtruth.blogspot.com/2...
Rainbow over Dallas, Texas Jan 6 2017
BREAKING NEWS! Russia makes a Huge Announcement That Will Change The War
Structure - a review of 'elections' in the U.S.A.
Wednesday
January 4, 2016
"I prefer winter, when you can see and feel the bone structure of the landscape. Something waits beneath it; the whole story doesn't show." Andrew Wyeth
If you've ever purchased a home, you understand that necessity of a building inspector reviewing the residence before signing the paperwork. He checks out everything from top to bottom, and looks at the structural bones of your potential home, not just the fancy throw pillows and paint colors. He climbs in the attic, crawls in basements and inspects the footings and weight bearing walls. A good home inspector is priceless.
The Chinese Elders did their homework when it came to restoring our Republic of the United States per Constitution law, and they set up a plan decades ago to throw out an illegal form of government in order to replace it with a legal one. They did the same with our money already and no one is the wiser.
They knew that if there were going to be successful at transition of power, through new governance at its core, it would have to seamless, invisible and come off without detection by the American or world public.
Now we know the popular vote in these United States does not elect our President or Vice President, only the electoral college voters do that. And we know these said electoral college voters are chosen in large part by their political parties, but are not required by Constitutional law to vote for whomever won the popular vote be it in their district, county or state. They can act as "faithless electors" and choose anyone they want. Meaning, structurally, these electoral voters can literally vote their conscious if they so choose and pay a small fine and go on their merry way.
Now on December 19, 2016, 538 democratic and republican electoral voters entered their state capitals and voted for President and Vice President into six separate envelopes and immediately sealed said envelopes, whereby nobody but them knows their vote until January 6, 2017, when the President of the Senate (in this case Vice President Joe Biden) opens them and records the result for all to see transparently in a joint session on Friday.
The main stream media choose to report that Trump secured the victory per the electoral college, but in truth, they are all speculating just like they did with Clinton's show-in victory pre-election. Because per the structure of how electoral votes are counted, nothing is "official" until the President of the Senate opens their sealed votes and counts them aloud before a joint session of Congress.
So OK, where does that leave us? Uncertain is where. Because until all sealed electoral votes are counted, nobody knows for sure who is President or Vice President… if at all yet. And this means were also made to wait on the RV until we have a new administration officially per international treaty (GESARA).
Because also per structural mandates of the electoral college in our Constitution, a candidate needs at least 270 electoral votes to win the electoral majority and be declared either President or Vice President. If any candidate fails to reach 270 electoral votes for any reason, the House of Representatives then Constitutionally, structurally, takes the top three electoral college vote getter's and selects between them for President; the Senate does the same for the Vice President.
Why is this important?
Because Donald Trump won 306 votes in last November's Presidential Election. Meaning, only 37 electoral voters must privately have change their electoral votes to potentially eliminate Trump as our next President. Sure it's rare, but not unprecedented as it's happened three times prior in American political history. So there is legal and political precedent for such an event.
What's even more interesting is Paul Ryan has been head the GOP since October 29, 2015 when he took the oath as Speaker of the House by unanimous vote of the House of Representatives. And there's a high probability that he hand selected a majority of the 306 republican electoral voters submitting those precious sealed electoral ballots.
Think about this: If only 37 of the 306 (12%) decide electoral votes decide to vote their conscious and select say Paul Ryan versus Donald Trump, that would toss the Presidential election into the House of Representatives, where the top three finishers are then considered as possible Presidential candidates.
Clinton clearly would not be elected as a democrat. Trump will probably not be selected by the traditional republican establishment in Washington who despise him on several levels, so that leaves only Paul Ryan as a possible next President. No wonder he didn't run. He didn't have to because he knew the true structure of his government. And so did the Chinese (and the Russians).
What's even more interesting in terms of understanding the structure of the American government is that back in 1871, the Republic of the United States was usurped or replaced by the UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, INCORPORATED via a majority vote of the US Congress.
This "government corporation" mimicked the true Republic of the United States of America government which was originally set up by the nation's forefathers per their US Constitution. The new form of government simply replaced the old and no one knew the difference. The exact opposite is happening now.
In 2012, that old USA, Inc. defaulted along with the Federal Reserve and all other entities that mimicked government agencies domiciled in Puerto Rico, and through a series of international bankruptcy proceedings that lasted 3 years, the national sovereignty of said Republic of the United States was restored in the fall of 2015, when it's former owners, the Catholic Church located in Vatican City, Rome, gave back the country and its natural resources the citizens of to the United States--declaring them sovereign citizens once again of a free world per the Golden Jubilee (hence the reason for sovereign rates).
And if you'll recall, Pope Frances also came to Washington in September 2015, and quietly released the United States people and country from church authority. What a prince. At the same time, Speaker of the House John Boehner suddenly resigned from his post, and after some discussion, Paul Ryan was installed and took the oath of that office on October 29, 2015.
Do you think maybe Ryan was a long ago pre-selected politician by the Chinese/Russians who insisted he take a future Presidential position and restore the Republic at some future date? Perhaps. But let's not get ahead of ourselves…
Now structurally, if the USA, Inc really defaulted in 2012, and came out of international bankruptcy court in the fall of 2015, that would mean that none of the elected officials in said USA, Inc. would be legal trustees to govern the affairs of the American people. This includes Barack Obama and Joe Biden, who would technically be private citizens not President and Vice President of said defaulted government corporation.
Structurally, that would mean that new Speaker of the House Paul Ryan would technically (and structurally) also have been elected as the interim President because no President or Vice President was sitting when the Republic was actually restored legally. And the next in line for succession of the highest office per the Constitution is the sitting Speaker of the House.
Here's where it gets weird (if it hasn't already) … if Speaker of the House Paul Ryan is in fact the interim Republic President per the Constitution, and just 37 people that he himself appointed to as electoral college voters selected him over Donald Trump in a sealed / anonymous ballot, then come January 6, 2017 it's quite possible that interim President Ryan will become permanent President Ryan, and pass down the mantle of Presidency to himself on inauguration day January 20, 2017.
Fascinating scenario yes? No? Either way, structurally it's a possibility per this geopolitical building inspector.
This would also mean that new private citizen Joe Biden will go through the motions and look as if he's still President of the Senate on January 6, followed by private citizen Barack Obama going through the motions for the next few weeks until he could publicly passes power peacefully--all be it fake--to Republic President Paul Ryan by way of the House of Representatives vote in lieu of a majority electoral college winner--which is beyond ironic because technically, legally, and structurally Ryan will have been interim Republic President for nearly a year and three months--without the public knowing.
Ok, now it's weird yes, but potentially a seamless transition ya gotta admit.
Could this wild theory concerning Constitutional structure actually be true? Could just 37 electoral college voters and 241 members of the House of Representatives (who just yesterday already voted for Ryan) actually be deciding the next President for 320 million sleeping citizens? Has Paul Ryan been the old form of government's restored Republic President for over a year now without the world knowing?
Structurally, it certainly can happen--the question is will it continue. Well, we're all going to find out for sure on January 6, 2017 starting at 1pm EST.
Stay tuned.
Is a prophecy about Obama coming true???
Now, Obama appears to be pulling the strings behind a push for peace among Israel and Palestine. Firstly, he instructed Samantha Power at the U.N. to abstain from a vote condemning Israel for building settlements. Secondly, he orchestrates a Paris convention involving 70 countries gathering together to discuss peace in the Holy Land and a two-state solution. The catch is that neither Israel nor Palestine will be at the meeting.
Now, Obama appears to be pulling the strings behind a push for peace among Israel and Palestine. Firstly, he instructed Samantha Power at the U.N. to abstain from a vote condemning Israel for building settlements. Secondly, he orchestrates a Paris convention involving 70 countries gathering together to discuss peace in the Holy Land and a two-state solution. The catch is that neither Israel nor Palestine will be at the meeting. They will be completely removed from direct conversation with the 70 countries. Perhaps a two-state solution will be accomplished without Israel of Palestine present.
The move to have a major convention about solving one of the world's greatest land conflicts just five days before a president leaves office is unprecedented. Why Obama would decide to do such a thing is not known. Nonetheless, he will send Kerry, likely Samantha Power, and an entire American delegation to Paris. Julian Felsenburgh also did the same thing when he signed a peace treaty.
In the novel, Lord of the World, we also meet another character named Father Francis, a Roman Catholic who leaves the church and joins Felsenburgh's new world religion. This religion is a combination of mother goddess worship and Freemasonry. Felsenburgh is, himself, a 33 year old Freemason who hates organized religion, especially Christianity. After he takes power, he orders Christians to be killed if they do not renounce their faith.
We should be questioning if a 1907 prophecy is coming to life right now. Several people, including a former pontiff, have suggested that "Lord of the World" is a prophecy in the form of a narrative. Pope Benedict 16 called the novel prophetic, while Pope Francis encouraged people two read it. He stated that the book portrayed the transition of the world toward the "globalization of hegemonic uniformity." He neglects to tell the audience that this uniformity is achieved through great violence, death, and destruction carried out by the Antichrist, Julian Felsenburgh.
Assange To CNN: You Have 48 Hours Until WikiLeaks Destroys You With Bombshell Leak
Following the election, many have wondered if WikiLeaks and Julian Assange will quietly go away or keep fighting for justice. If you wanted them to keep fighting to expose corruption, you are in for a treat as WikiLeaks has selected their first target of the year: CNN.
They are tired of the disgusting behavior of the mainstream media and they threatening to sue CNN now for their inflammatory remarks.
We have issued instructions to sue CNN for defamation:https://t.co/YLfyQ9ROCyUnless within 48h they air a one hour expose of the plot.
— WikiLeaks (@wikileaks) January 4, 2017
CNN initially thought they could just issue an apology and that would satisfy Assange. Think again.
WikiLeaks also argued that they will expose CNN outside of the courtroom, too, if they continue to play these games.
US 2017: Former CIA head official denounces government critic as a 'pedophile'. https://t.co/TWu91qp929>— WikiLeaks Task Force (@WLTaskForce) January 5, 2017
One thing remains clear: WikiLeaks doesn’t plan to stop after derailing Hillary Clinton and her team of cronies. CNN is merely their first target, and plenty more will surely follow.
They’ve put CNN on notice and they have 48 hours to air a one hour special confessing to their lies or they are in big trouble. If they or anyone think WikiLeaks are bluffing or incapable, ask Hillary Clinton how powerful Assange and his team can be.
Montana Natural Man back in court again!
Ernie Wayne terTelgte, The Montana Natural Man, first gained the attention of patriots across the nation when he amassed millions of views on YouTube with his actions within the Montana court systems. The event that went viral was due to his being arrested for fishing without a license and then resisting arrest. We covered his last court appearance he had for driving without a license. Ernie was arrested last month and has a new Omnibus hearing Thursday January 5th, 2017. We will also be covering this as well. Check back for more video updates.
This video brought to you courtesy of Jason Van Tatenhove of Liberty Brothers Radio.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SQf3AAg_SWA
https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=liberty+brothers+radio
http://ex-media.us/
Here is the original video that got over 7 million views.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=06VzxxDTnB8
Check back to this blog for updates. The omnibus hearing this morning will be published later today if everything goes right. Ernie is preparing for another hearing in February and refused to enter their jurisdiction again this morning. Quite frankly, they don't quite know what to do with this freedom loving American State national living lawfully on the land jurisdiction in Montana State.
To get the whole background of what his stand is based on, as he mentioned in this video, get the book by Anna Von Reitz called "You Know Something is Wrong When.....: An American Affidavit of Probable Cause" at her website here: http://www.annavonreitz.com/order.html
GMO vs Non GMO Corn - which one do YOU eat?
(1) Sustainable Pulse
(2) An integrated multi-omics analysis of the NK603 Roundup-tolerant GM maize reveals metabolism disturbances caused by the transformation process
http://www.nature.com/articles/srep37855
Terror cells U.S.-Mexican border
Islamic terror cells shift from Mideast to U.S. - Mexican border
'They are only waiting for the order' to attack American cities
Leo Hohmann
As part of the plan, Islamists have arrived recently at the Monterrey International Airport situated in Apodaca, a city in the Mexican state of Nuevo León, about 130 miles south of the Texas border, JW reports.
“An internal Mexican law enforcement report obtained by Judicial Watch confirms that Islamic terrorists have ‘people along the border, principally in Tijuana, Chihuahua, Coahuila, Nuevo León and Tamaulipas.'”
U.S. intelligence sources have also warned that the defeat of ISIS in Iraq and Syria will lead to many of those jihadists escaping and relocating into Western Europe and the United States.
But JW reported as early as April 2015 that ISIS had established a training camp just a few miles from El Paso, Texas, in an area known as “Anapra” just west of Ciudad Juárez in the Mexican state of Chihuahua.
Just ‘waiting for the order’
According to the JW report, cartel informants have told law enforcement that “they are only waiting for the order and the times to carry out a simultaneous attack in the different ports of entry or cities of the United States of America.”
Drug cartels have a working “agreement” with Islamic terrorists, according to a high-ranking Mexican police administrator, who told JW that men from the Middle East arrive regularly into the country to train jihadists.
One seasoned Mexican law enforcement official told Judicial Watch that a key cartel informant verified picking up various Middle Eastern men from “evil groups” at the Monterrey Airport in the last few days alone. JW described the informant as “extremely credible” having also worked for several U.S. government agencies.
U.S. about to reap what it has sown
John Guandolo, a former FBI counter-terrorism specialist who now heads up the private consulting business Understanding the Threat, said the U.S. is about to reap the bitter fruit it has been sowing under the last several administrations – the Clintons, Bushes and Obamas — all of whom invited the Muslim Brotherhood into the White House as an inside policy player.
As a result, all references to Islam deemed offensive to Muslims has been scrubbed from FBI training manuals and Muslim Brotherhood entities like CAIR have been providing advice on how to deal with terrorism. Now, terror cells are here and ready to strike, as documented by Judicial Watch.
One seasoned Mexican law enforcement official told Judicial Watch that a key cartel informant verified picking up various Middle Eastern men from “evil groups” at the Monterrey Airport in the last few days alone. JW described the informant as “extremely credible” having also worked for several U.S. government agencies.
U.S. about to reap what it has sown
“Because we will not associate ‘terrorism’ with Islam as a part of our national security directives and overall strategy, Islamic organizations, mosques, enclaves, and communities continue to serve as support networks, training sites and safe havens for jihadis across the United States,” Guandolo said.
He said Muslim leaders control the false narrative that terrorism has nothing to do with Islam, and they put themselves in the driver’s seat to be the gateway for all information getting to government leaders having to do with Islam.
Law enforcement neutered under Obama
“Islamic leaders get the federal government — the White House and DOJ especially — to bear down on local/state governments and law enforcement to let the FBI handle all counter-terrorism investigations, then strip the FBI of all factual understanding of the real threat and tie their hands so they cannot be aggressive in any case,” Guandolo said.
Philip Haney, a retired Homeland Security officer who co-authored the whistleblower book “See Something Say Nothing,” said the global Islamic movement led by the extremist Muslim Brotherhood is anticipating that they will encounter a far less friendly regime in Washington and they are filing some of their most militant assets into place.
Guandolo said the U.S. Department of Justice has been the most ardent supporter of the Islamic movement in America. It has aggressively gone on the offensive, suing any jurisdiction that takes any proactive measures to pursue the Islamic threat at the local level. This has weakened law enforcement’s ability to do its job. The DOJ has pushed Muslim Brotherhood organizations into local jurisdictions to do training for state and local law enforcement agencies, sponsored by U.S. attorneys’ offices.
Exploiting gaps on the way to ‘zero hour’
In this environment, Guandolo said terrorists use “Grand Canyon-size gaps in our security apparatus” to develop routes, methods and locations to move people, money and equipment in preparation for what the Muslim Brotherhood calls “zero hour.”
Evidence of this strategy was entered into the court record during the largest terrorism financing trial ever successfully prosecuted in American history – the Holy Land Foundation trial in Dallas, Texas, in 2007-08.
“These routes, methods, and locations will be used by many nefarious entities be they cartels, terrorists, or gangs. In the end, though, they will lead to devastating results in American towns,” Guandolo said.
“It is nothing less than concerted and incremental efforts by heads of the key agencies of the United States — DHS, FBI, CIA, the White House counter-terrorism adviser — and the president himself to make America tragically vulnerable to our enemies,” he adds. “This is treason and sedition, and we will pay for allowing it for so long.”
Former Congresswoman Michele Bachmann said Obama’s national security team has either known or should have known about the existence of Islamic terror cells on U.S. soil and along the border, “yet willingly allowed them to use the U.S. as a safe haven.” “To think Obama would fail to destroy every vestige of a U.S. based Islamic terror cell is both jaw dropping and unthinkable, especially in light of the numerous U.S. based Islamic terror attacks that have already occurred in the U.S. on his watch,” Bachmann told WND.
“Unfortunately, Obama’s failures are now President Trump’s responsibilities,” she added. “Mr. Trump will have to extinguish this evil from American soil — there is no other choice because Islamic supremacism has one goal — to conquer our land. We have to destroy this evil before they can destroy our liberty.”
Obama continues to stab America in the back on his way out the door
RULED BY DC: GET THE FEDS OUT OF WESTERN LANDS
In the final days of his administration, Obama has decided that, with the stroke of pen, he shall further consolidate direct federal control over lands within Western states. Specifically, Obama created the Bear Ears National Monument and the Gold Butte National Monument in Utah and Nevada, respectively.
The Obama Administration claims that Obama's unilateral edict was necessary because Congress had not passed any legislation on the matter. Indeed, the Obama-appointed Interior Secretary stated that "protecting the area using legislation would have been preferable" but that in the absence of legislation, it was necessary to simply declare the lands to be National Monuments.
In other words, the democratic (communism), constitutional process of Congressional lawmaking was inconvenient for the President. So, he decided to rule by proclamation instead, giving the Governor of Utah barely an hour's notice before the proclamation was made public.
It's Not About Conservation — It's About Federal Control
Now, we should first note that the overwhelming majority of lands newly designated as 'National Monument' lands were already federal lands to begin with, and have been controlled largely by the US Bureau of Land Management and the Forest Service.Moreover, it is not the case that opponents to the new designation are mostly people who want to privatize the land or make it easier to mine or develop the land. In fact, many opponents of the designation oppose it because they fear Monument status will lead to greater development of the area as a tourist mecca
In other cases, members of Indian tribes object to making sacred lands part of a federally-controlled National Monument area.
And, of course, throughout Western states public lands continue to be a lucrative source of tourist dollars and eco-tourism. The old caricature of pro-conservationist leftists and strip-mining conservatives has long been just that: a caricature.
The reality is that nowadays many private firms and local governments depend on public lands for their livelihood and revenue, and these groups have quite a bit of influence at the state legislatures in question. Preserving natural spaces from development can mean big business and Western-state politicians know it:
It is not at all clear that markets or local governments would prefer that land be used for agricultural purposes as opposed to other purposes. For example, were Rocky Mountain National Park to become a locally-controlled park or state park, there is realistically speaking, zero chance that it would be handed over to ranchers or miners. The park is far too valuable to the local economy as part of the recreation and tourism industries. To turn the park into range land would devastate the economies of the local communities, many of which contain wealthy and influential voters.
But, say that the park were broken up into parcels and sold to a number of private owners. (We're in the realm of pure fantasy at this point.) It would make little sense to use the land for mining or ranching even in this case. Given the infrastructure in place and the relative closeness to a major metropolitan area, the lands in and around the Park are likely far more lucrative for recreational purposes than for mining or ranching.There is little doubt, however, that much of the controversy over the site will be framed like this: on one side are the conscientious environmentalists and others who want to preserve these pristine lands from destruction. On the other side are oil executives who want to strip-mine the land.
The real debate here, however, isn't over strip mining vs. conservation. It's about whether or not a 'president' thousands of miles away can — with the stroke of a pen — dictate how millions of acres in a faraway state can be used, and do so over the protestations of the state legislature.
Nor can it be demonstrated that federal agencies are better custodians of lands than are states. Indeed, the federal government has routinely been more inclined to allow overgrazing on federal lands while subsidizing ranchers at taxpayer expense. It is the states that have demonstrated more prudent stewardship of resources.
Moreover, The Denver post in a 2014 editorial noted other cases in which the 'federal government' hapless mismanaged fish and wildlife issues:
One has only to look at the great elk management debacle in Rocky Mountain National Park. When populations grew out of control in the park, federal decision-makers chose to pay significant sums to bring in contract killers to thin the herd. A proposal by Colorado wildlife managers to use well-trained hunters and donate the meat to struggling families was cast aside.
We could further examine the sad case of game fish being electrocuted and buried on the Yampa River in northwest Colorado at the insistence of the U.S. Fish and Wildlife Service to preserve the pike minnow, while the same pike minnows are slaughtered and dumped in Washington state to preserve the wild salmon. All of this, in a never-ending nightmare of bureaucratic red tape with no firmly stated goals or objective in sight, by design.
Perhaps the most memorable recent example of this occurred in 2013 when the 'federal government' shut down national parks and other federal lands as part of the usual "government shutdown" ploy.
The 'federal government' dispatched federal agents armed with assault rifles who forcibly ejected visitors from the allegedly “public lands.”
Meanwhile, nearby towns that rely on tourists for the local economy were powerless to open the parks themselves. State officials, who are far more sensitive to local economic needs than members of Congress or the White House, were also powerless to do anything.
Eventually, after much political pressure was applied, the 'federal government' kindly allowed states to pay millions to the 'federal government' to open the parks again.
These are just some of the reasons why Utahns of various interests have opposed greater 'federal' power over lands in their states.
Federal Lands Are the Problem
This Obama Administration's move with Bear Ears is the latest "screw-you" to Utah in an ongoing effort by the State of Utah to exercise more control over federal lands.For years now, the Utah legislature and the state's delegation in Congress have been exploring ways to limit federal control over lands within the borders of Utah.
What is steadfastly ignored in the debate, however, is the questionable legitimacy of federal control over so many immense swaths of land.
Today, the feds control 640 million acres (not counting the far larger federally-owned areas of coastal sea floor). And in most Western states, the Federal government owns more than a third of all the land.
In the case of Utah and Nevada, where the two new 'monuments' are created, the 'federal government' owns 65 percent and 85 percent of all land, respectively.
This means that these lands are ultimately controlled by politicians thousands of miles away who are not citizens of those states.
In the case of Utah, for example, federal lands are controlled by executive-branch bureaucrats — few of whom are from Utah — or they are controlled by Congressional laws passed by a Congress composed of 529 non-Utahns and 6 Utahns.
The fact that lands in Utah should be largely controlled by Californians, Texans, and New Yorkers — many of whom have never even set foot in Utah — should strike reasonable people as both objectionable and bizarre.
At the same time, if those lands are truly sacred sites, as some groups contend, then those sites should be Tribal lands and neither federal or state lands. (See "Why Indian-Tribe Sovereignty Is Important.")
Repeal the Antiquities Act?
Other observers of the Obama Administration's many executive orders on federal lands have called for the abolition of the Antiquities Act of 1906 which empowers the president to designate federal lands as National Monuments. The Act allows presidents to act unilaterally without any consent from Congress as to how these lands might be designated. Moreover, as critics of the Act note, the Act was supposed to protect small areas of archeological or geographical interest. But, the Act has been abused in order to make many thousands of acres into areas similar to National Parks.Repealing the acts would be a step in the right direction, but it fails to tackle the larger problem of federal lands. After all, if federal lands were not so expansive to begin with, the Antiquities Act would be far more limited in its scope. And, even if Congress were the body designating Monument status, that would only be a tiny improvement.
It's true that giving a single person in the Oval office the ability to control lands in faraway states is a problem. However, giving that same control to 535 people in a building down the street form the Oval Office isn't exactly a significant improvement.
https://mises.org/blog/ruled-dc-get-feds-out-western-lands
RELATED: Can the States Seize Control of Federal Lands?
Thursday, January 5, 2017
Report: Homeland Security Officials Took Millions in Bribes to 'Look the Other Way' on Drug Cartels
Hundreds of DHS employees have "looked the other way" as drugs crossed the border because cartels have made them offers they can't refuse. Other employees have sold green cards and other documents illegally. More from The New York Times:
It was not an isolated case. A review by The New York Times of thousands of court records and internal agency documents showed that over the last 10 years almost 200 employees and contract workers of the Department of Homeland Security have taken nearly $15 million in bribes while being paid to protect the nation’s borders and enforce immigration laws.
No wonder our immigration system is so broken.
In order to address the internal issues, the department has hired more investigators, offered ethics training and is administering polygraph tests to new applicants, The Times reports.
The Times report does not include the gifts, trips or money that DHS employees have stolen, the editors note.
Once the inside corruption is taken care of, Donald Trump's administration can get to work on building a wall along the southern border, install better aerial surveillance and send more agents down there to be on the patrol.
A WELCOMED VIEW BY VLADIMIR PUTIN SPEECH THE SHORTEST SPEECH EVER repost from 2014
Vladimir Putin’s speech – SHORTEST SPEECH EVER.
On August 04, 2013, Vladimir Putin, the Russian president, addressed the Duma, (Russian Parliament), and gave a speech about the tensions with minorities in Russia:
Russia does not need Muslim minorities. Minorities need Russia, and we will not grant them special privileges, or try to change our laws to fit their desires, no matter how loud they yell ‘discrimination’. We will not tolerate disrespect of our Russian culture. We better learn from the suicides of America, England, Holland and France, if we are to survive as a nation. The Muslims are taking over those countries and they will not take over Russia. The Russian customs and traditions are not compatible with the lack of culture or the primitive ways of Sharia Law and Muslims.
The politicians in the Duma gave Putin a five minute standing ovation.