(excerpt from):
WERE YOU EVER FREE***CAN YOU BE FREE***WITHOUT OWNING LAND??? THE LAND STILL BELONGS TO THE KING, AMERICANS WERE NEVER FREE
[ BRITAIN THROUGH WAR WAS LEGISLATING FOR THE UNITED STATES
"...***My Comment***
What was the another cause and effect of the War of 1812? The biggest slave trading nation in the world would use this divisive issue against America in the Ghent Treaty of 1815, knowing once passed, legislation would have to be passed by the American Congress, to comply with the Treaty. [This was done] Knowing this issue would divide the North from the South, to divide and then conquer.
Was this the only way Britain attacked the United States? No they used even more subversive ways; the creation and control of the Bank of the United States in 1791-1811 and again in 1816-1836, which could not have be[en] done without Washington creating federal District overlays in every state in March of 1791, the same month the bank was Chartered. I might add, when this took place, Congress was out of session. This was the case until President Jackson drove a stake through its heart. However, their control over the money, finances and the media was so complete, with their bought Congressman and Senators, we were doomed.
The other way they completed their attack and Conquest, was through the Lawyers and Judges they controlled, to overrule and rewrite long standing stare decisis, coinciding with their destruction of our documents in Washington during the War of 1812. There is no telling the significance of the documents that were destroyed; one document we know of, was the existence of the original Thirteenth Amendment, which would have forever driven a stake through the heart of the legal professions influence over our government, making it illegal for them to hold office in the U.S. government, because of their conflict of interest, [in] serving two masters. This would have destroyed the kings ability to legislate for the United States, for he would have no access to our government through his esquires.
***End Comment***..."
"... ***Comment by the Informer***
"One has to read the treatise by Charles Warren titled, "The History Of The American Bar", published 1966 by Howard Fertig and Little , Brown and co., lib. of cong. Card # 66-24357. This will tell you the entire sordid history of lawyers, when they started, where they started, how they came to be the scourge of American colonies before the revolutionary war and how they seemingly became the good guys at the time of 1774 to 1790.
It explains the middle and inner temples of the bar and how they influenced the American courts, to the point that all the non lawyer judges said they would some day rule the courts and every aspect of life in America. Now, that has come to pass and this was predicted back in 1774. This book cannot be skim read and is 581 pages. After you read this, you will know why the king placed the inner and middle temple lawyers in America, so that he would have rule of the courts, and why the war of 1812 was created to destroy the original 13th Amendment. Without the esquires, the king was dead in the water, so to speak."
***End Comment [by] the Informer***
***My Comment***
Have you never wondered why our system of government so mirrors the British system? I bet many of you, yet today, have no idea where our federal reserve system comes from. It is the copy of the British Exchequer; it was written in secret by the Bank of England. Don't believe it? I suggest you read a Book I wrote back in 1992 called "A Country Defeated In Victory, parts 1 and 2" (the facts cannot be disputed), much of which is Congressional Record. There are many other policies and programs we have, that mirror Britain's, but I will not go into them here. So read the following quotes, then, contemplate what it means that the above Treaties were suspended.
***End Comment***
NOTES-GREAT BRITAIN
On the 1st of June, 1812, President Madison transmitted a confidential message to Congress respecting the relations with Great Britain. It ended without recommending any particular action.2 It was received in each Body with closed doors.3 In the House, it was considered on the 2d and 3d of June with closed doors. On the 3d, Calhoun, from the Committee on Foreign Relations to whom it had been referred, reported (the House being in secret session):
[begin quote] "that after the experience which the United States have had of the great injustice of the British Government towards them, exemplified by so many acts of violence and oppression, it will be more difficult to justify to the impartial world their patient forbearance, than the measures to which it has become necessary to resort, to avenge the wrongs and vindicate the rights and honor of the nation.
* The period has now arrived when the United States must support their character and station among the nations of the earth.
* More than seven years have elapsed since the commencement of this system of hostile aggressions by the British Government on the rights and interests of the United States.
* As early as 1804 the Minister of the United States at London was instructed to invite the British Government to enter into a negotiation, on all the points, on which a collision might arise between the two countries in the course of the war, and to propose to it an arrangement of their claims on fair and reasonable conditions. The invitation was accepted.
* It was at this time and under these circumstances that an attack was made, by surprise, upon an important branch of the American Commerce.
* The commerce on which this attack was so unexpectedly made, was that between the United States and the Colonies of France, Spain and other enemies of Great Britain.
* In May, 1806, the whole coast of the continent from the Elbe to Brest, inclusive, was declared to be in a state of blockade. By this act, the well-established principles of the law of nations—principles which have served for ages as guides, and fixed the boundary between the rights of belligerents and neutrals--were violated.
* The next act of the British Government which claims our attention is the order of council, of January 7, 1807, by which neutral powers are prohibited from trading from one port to another of France or her allies, or any other country with which Great Britain might not freely trade.
* We proceed to bring into view the British order in council of November 11, 1807.
* By this order all France and her allies, and every other country at war with Great Britain, or with which she was not at war, from which the British flag was excluded, and all the colonies of her enemies, were subjected to the same restrictions as if they were actually blockaded in the most strict and rigorous manner; and all trade in articles, the produce and manufacture of the said countries and colonies, and the vessels engaged in it, were subject to capture and condemnation as lawful prize.
The attempt to dismember our Union and overthrow our excellent Constitution, by a secret mission, the object of which was to foment discontent and excite insurrection against the constituted authorities and laws of the nation, as lately disclosed by the agent employed in it, affords full proof that there is no bound to the hostility of the British Government against the United States." [end quote] Treaties and Conventions, Department of State 1889, pg. 1325-1326
NOTES-GREAT BRITAIN
"From this review of the multiplied wrongs of the British Government, since the commencement of the present war, it must be evident to the impartial world that the contest which is now forced on the United States is radically a contest for their sovereignty and independence." Treaties and Conventions, Department of State 1889, pg. 1326
***My Comment***
Finally America, it does not get any plainer than the facts above. Unless you can hold your hand up to the government when they come to take your land, and say: stop, "you cannot come on my land", and the government turns away and never comes back to bother you or your heirs again, the arguments you may have with what I said above are bogus, because the nexus between allodial and Freeman cannot be overcome.
America, is there any hope of your waking up? Why must you be hit over the head over and over with truth? Still you make bogus claims in the courts, just to have the judges admonish you for your foolishness? Do you have to go to jail before you say "Damn, something is not right here, things are not as they appear, black is white, white is black"? As long as you don't know the enemy, nor the weapons used against you in this warfare, how in God's name do you think anything will change?
Much of America, the Christians, are waiting for Jesus Christ to come back and take care of the problem. Christians, unless you can figure a way to force Christ off His Throne before His enemies are destroyed, thereby forcing Him to violate His Word, you are going to have a very long wait and continue to go down the crapper while you wait.
Why the strong admonishment? Because I'm tired of America accepting a lie, to acquiesce for the easiest path, rather than facing up to the facts of their legal and financial enslavement, because only when you face up to a problem will you do anything about it. As long as you wish to accept voluntary slavery, which is legal, the remedy will never be learned or used.
I have said all the above to say this; there is a way to change this, and I am not talking of armed rebellion or insurrection. In fact, it is the only way of reaching the level of freedom we seek and what we have a right to demand, thereby removing the yokes from around our necks.
The answer does not lie in a civil remedy, as I stated several times above in dealing with mans physical attempts to do it his way. Our Freedom has to do with a Trust granted by our Father in Heaven. I am working on a short paper that will explain how we can regain our freedom through His knowledge, thereby exercising our rights provided in our Trust, as the legitimate heirs of Christ's Kingdom; the neat thing is, just as with the worldly kings system, no one has access to our Trust, except the heirs of Christ; until then keep the faith.
***End Comment***
James Franklin Montgomery ..."]
