By Anna Von Reitz
We are Third Party Beneficiaries with respect to the National Trust created
in the Preamble and are indemnified in the British system under two Royal
Sovereign Seals--- the seal of King George the III with respect to the delegated
powers, and the seal of William Belcher with respect to the undelegated powers,
otherwise known as the Great Seal of the United States. William Belcher
inherited his sovereignty as a result of the Norman Conquest of Britain and
Wales. Thus, the Definitive Treaty of Peace, Paris, 1783, calls George III the
"prince of the United States" and does not mention who the actual Head of
State---the "king" of the United States--- was. Later generations simply
presumed it was the British Monarch, with results disastrous to them and to us.
This split of delegated and undelegated powers held by two sovereigns in
international jurisdiction ultimately resulted in the situation we have today,
where the delegated powers are held by the British-backed United States and the
undelegated powers are held by the "states and people" under the Belcher Seal
and operated by the United States of America by default.
The misunderstanding about our states (and also, therefore, our state
offices) comes about because people don't grasp the difference between the
international jurisdiction of the sea and the national jurisdiction of the
land. Everything discussed above, including the National Trust established by
the Preamble, exists only in the international jurisdiction of the sea and has
nothing to do with our sovereignty on the land.
We have all been taught to focus on the Constitution but that is
substantially a red herring in that it discusses only our position with respect
to the foreign international jurisdiction and says nothing about our own
sovereign domain. This can be excused in that our land jurisdiction was never
the subject of The Constitution, so why would the Founders talk about that? We
were expected to know the basis of our own sovereignty on the land, just as we
were expected to know the history and protect our own Common Law Courts from
British meddling.
Two centuries later, the situation speaks for itself.
As to our sovereignty on the land which vests itself in our nations called
"states" for international purposes, that sovereignty derives from entirely
different authorities and specifically begins with a land grant and settlement
made by the King of Spain in 1778 via (yet another) Treaty of Paris.
The situation was that the British King was financing both sides of the
Revolution to hedge his bets--- he emerged the victor to a greater or lesser
extent, either way. The King of France was intermediary funneling funds to the
Americans. The King of Spain, however, had grudges against both the King of
Britain and the King of France ---- and he was in charge of the land
jurisdiction worldwide, thanks to the claims of the Holy See and its
"dispensations" under the Unam Sanctum Trust.
So while the Americans were concluding their treaty with France to secure
what most of them believed was French support for the American Revolution, the
King of Spain quietly granted the entire continent (absent Spain's holdings of
course) to the rebels via the "other" Treaty of Paris, 1778. If they could win
the war, the land was already vouchsafed to them--- and as of 1778, it was
available to them to use as collateral to borrow against internationally.
This is how the Americans financed their loans from the French King who was
actually acting as a pass-through agent for King George III. They wagered their
claim to the land given to them by the Spanish King and used it as collateral.
If George III had won the ground war, he would have won the whole shooting
match; as it was, he emerged with a tidy debt owed by the Americans and a great
deal of leverage, which he used to secure the delegated powers granted to him
and his proxy government in DC.
The land claim passed from the Spanish King to the colonies, which in the
years immediately following the end of open hostilities with Britain (1783-1789)
undertook a number of inter-colony initiatives to settle the land jurisdiction
claims. This all focused on settling the national borders of the separate
nation-states, establishing trade relationships, currencies, treaties with
respect to international commercial issues, taxation, interstate travel,
security of the international Post Roads and Post Offices, and similar
concerns. As for the basic grant of land jurisdiction, they issued another
trust known as The Supreme Republican Declaration of the United Colonies,
grandfathering in the original thirteen colonies as a union of land jurisdiction
states, and claiming all the rest of the land jurisdiction for themselves and
their progeny subject to later arrangements and acquisitions.
The later arrangements were solidified by the Northwest Ordinance which
provided for the orderly creation and inclusion of territories and from the
territories the creation of new nation-states which would be enabled to enter
the union under the Equal Footing Doctrine. The inclusion of "other
acquisitions" such as the Louisiana Purchase and the Republic of Texas and the
Spanish Settlement followed the same basic pattern of establishing a form of
territorial government and later, upon enrollment in the original union, a
separate state government.
Throughout this discussion we are talking about geographically defined
nations and their body politics simply called, "California" or "Wisconsin" or
"Ohio". References in law books to these states always use the style
"states"----- no capitalization whatsoever. These are the sovereign states from
which our sovereignty on the land of this continent derives. These states are
nations in the fullest sense of the word, just like Britain or France.
They are completely different and separate from any "State of __________",
and in fact, the word "of" means "separate from, apart from, or belonging to",
so "State of Delaware" is talking about what? The international corporation
used by the actual state known as Delaware and its people to operate in
international commerce.
In trade, Delaware needs no "State of _________" to
conduct business within its own borders or with other
unincorporated sovereign states and nations. It is only when
it wishes to engage in incorporated business transactions with
the other nation-states, like the State of California, or with other countries
like France, that it needs to use an incorporated "State of ___________".
And therein lies the rub.
Each state retains its right to conduct trade
within its borders and also retains the right to trade with other sovereign
nations; it uses a "State of _________" corporation to operate in
international commerce outside its borders---
and the proxy "Federal Government" run by the British Monarch has delegated
control of international commerce. This control is exercised by operating
all incorporated businesses in all states as franchises of the United States,
Inc.
So now you know the difference between the actual land jurisdiction
sovereign state and the fact that each one is in fact a separate nation, an
entire country unto itself, plus you know what the "State of _________" entity
is and what it is used for and who controls it and why.
None of the states operated in international commerce until after the Civil
War. At that time, The United States of America, Inc. was formed, and the
original states were forced to write new "state constitutions". Under these new
constitutions (all constitutions are debt agreements) the corporation used by
the actual sovereign state was obliged to operate under names styled like this:
California State, Wyoming State, Florida State. Meanwhile, the name "State of
California" and "State of Wyoming", etc. was "adopted" by totally different
entities under new ownership.
This switch and the use of the same old names applied to different
corporate entities led up to the greatest fraud in human history. The "State of
Illinois" prior to the Civil War was an entirely different beastie and under
completely different ownership than the "State of Illinois" after the Civil War
and the same pattern applies across the whole country. There is a state
constitution prior to the Civil War and a new state constitution after the Civil
War.
Fast forward again to the 1930's. FDR is working as liaison for the United
States, Inc. at the Geneva Conventions, May, 1930. As a business ploy, the G-5
nations agree by private treaty to bankrupt their "international corporations"
and discharge all debts left over from the First World War.
Three years later, Roosevelt, now elected President of the United States,
carries through and by sleight of hand and deceptive wordsmithing, sets up a
constructive fraud by which the California State, Illinois State and other land
jurisdiction corporations are "assumed" to be sureties standing good for the
debts of the United States, Inc. even though they are owned and operated by the
United States of America, Inc.
This isn't a corporate take-over. It's just plain old commercial fraud in
which false claims are made against the assets of a Third Party and false
assumptions then lead to that innocent victim being charged for the debt via a
process of commercial liens and titles and hypothecation of debt.
The American states and people were raped, pillaged, and plundered by the
United States, Inc. and the British Crown from 1930 to 1999, when all debts of
the bankruptcy of the United States of America were discharged and settled and
our "States" doing business as "California State" and "Wisconsin State" were
left derelict and adrift, mere shells ---- and in exactly the same condition as
a man recovering from bankruptcy.
All this was accomplished in Breach of Trust and Commercial Contract by the
British Monarch and the British Government operating under color of law on our
land, pretending to be our friends, allies, and protectors.
As a result of their vicious fraud our State corporations were left in
financial ruin, but like a man recovering from bankruptcy, not dead.
The vermin responsible for palming off their odious debts on us have tried
by every means to "finish us off" in the intervening years, without success.
All this history is necessary for you to know before I can answer your
"simple" question about the oaths of office owed to our actual States.
The "vacated offices" that we are occupying belong to the land jurisdiction
state and are operated as offices of the formerly bankrupted "Alaska State",
"California State" and so on. These offices were "vacated" during the long
bankruptcy and so far as the vermin responsible for this circumstance are
concerned, it was never anticipated that they would be re-occupied by the states
and the people they belong to.
During the bankruptcy these States were operated by "State of State
Legislatures" functioning as Bankruptcy Trustees---- corporate con artists
overseeing the rape and the pillaging, but nonetheless "representing" the state
in the position of Trustees. These legislatures operating in that capacity
continued to pass "Session Laws" to administer the affairs of the victims.
Thus, for example we have Session Laws that establish the "California State"
under a new "state constitution" in 1879, and we have Session Laws established
for the bankrupt entity throughout the bankruptcy.
It is via the circa 1870's "constitutions" creating the Wisconsin State,
Louisiana State and so on, that we maintain a chain of title and
succession of contract back to the original Constitution and are
enabled to enforce it. It is via the Session Laws related to the "second" state
constitutions that we obtain the offices and the oaths.
All land jurisdiction offices are exercised under red ink. Business
signatures are in script in Upper and Lower Case. All land jurisdiction
transactions are understood to be in trade, not commerce, and are not under the
control of the United States. Our business as State officials and State
Citizens is all conducted under unincorporated business structures locally
(hence the need for all state and county assemblies to operate as unincorporated
businesses) and under undelegated powers internationally ---note the red Post
Marks.
All commerce is exercised in blue ink. Commercial signatures of "Account
Holders" are in script in Upper and Lower Case. All sea jurisdiction
transactions entered into by US PERSONS are understood to be in commerce. You
are considered to be acting as a US PERSON if you retain such a PERSON. You
surrender these PERSONS via surrendering the BC to the Secretary of the Treasury
and appoint him your Fiduciary and credit the United States of America, U.S.
Treasury, without recourse.
That settles the issue of whether you are operating as a State Citizen or a
US Citizen.
This entire history from the Civil War to date is nothing but a nasty scam
designed by the British to bilk their Creditors and palm off their debts on
innocent Third Parties, but once you have the history and the names nailed down,
it gets easier to comprehend.
-----------------------------See this article and over 400 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com
