Monday, July 30, 2012

OBAMA'S ENTREPRENEURIAL COMMUNIST MANIFESTO

President Obama’s business comments a couple weeks ago in Roanoke, Va., in which he said, “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen,” sounded more communistic than capitalistic, especially since the “somebody” to whom Obama referred was, in fact, the U.S. federal government.
Progressives and the mainstream media were quick to come to the aid of the president’s economic gaffe by stating that similar statements have been said by other entrepreneurial moguls like Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, Andrew Carnegie and Walter Chrysler. Others excused Obama by saying he “borrowed” his business verbiage from Democratic Senate candidate Elizabeth Warren.
No one is denying the genius of collective contributions or the power of working together. One of my favorite acrostics is TEAM: Together Everyone Achieves More. But the key difference between President Obama’s teamwork and all the rest of those inspirational innovators is that the latter were referencing other individuals’ collaborative efforts within their own entrepreneurship, while Obama was pointing to politicians and specifically the federal government as the business associates responsible for your success.
Look for yourself at how Obama progressively unveiled “government” as the “somebody” in his speech and rationale (underlines added):
If you were successful, somebody along the line gave you some help. There was a great teacher somewhere in your life. Somebody helped to create this unbelievable American system that we have that allowed you to thrive. Somebody invested in roads and bridges. If you’ve got a business. you didn’t build that. Somebody else made that happen. The Internet didn’t get invented on its own. Government research created the Internet so that all the companies could make money off the Internet.
In fact, the entirety of Obama’s speech points to the prize in partnership with the federal government. Obama believes it is none of your business!
Obama’s Roanoke statements shouldn’t come as any surprise, as he has emphatically declared from early in his presidency that “only government” is our savior, and then he supported his socialistic platform through multiple company and corporate bailouts. To Obama, government is your business partner; government is your savior; government is your hero; government is the economic caped crusader who swoops down like the Dark Knight to save your soul, sales and pocketbook.
In fact, Obama’s belief in government partnership (indeed, ownership) is at the heart of his justification to increase the taxes on every couple in business who make more than $250,000 a year (a levy that an Ernst & Young study just showed would cost or decrease 710,000 U.S. jobs).
Obama’s Roanoke business comments were an assault to free enterprise and entrepreneurialism. They were not a gaffe; they represent at very least his preferred philosophy for a European type of socialism. The Wall Street Journal even confessed that the president is “subordinating to government the individual enterprise and risk-taking that underlies prosperity.”
The truth is, Obama’s statements in Roanoke were in no way reminiscent of great capitalists and innovators like Henry Ford, Bill Gates, Steve Jobs, etc. On the other hand, his words did smack of a few other societal manipulators:
“Society does not consist of individuals, but expresses the sum of interrelations, the relations within which these individuals stand.” – Karl Marx
“Production itself changed from a series of individual into a series of social acts, and the products from individuals to social products. The yard, the cloth, the metals that now came out of the factory were the joint product of many workers through whose hands they had successfully to pass before they were ready. (No one person could say of them: “I made that; this is my product.”) – Fredrick Engels
“All our lives we fought against exalting the individual, against the elevation of the single person, and long ago we were over and done with the business of a hero, and here it comes up again: the glorification of one personality. This is not good at all.” – Vladimir Lenin
“Comrades, we must abolish the cult of the individual decisively, once and for all.” – Nikita Khrushchev
“We must affirm anew the discipline of the Party, namely: 1) the individual is subordinate to the organization; 2) the minority is subordinate to the majority; 3) the lower level is subordinate to the higher level; and 4) the entire membership is subordinate to the Central Committee.  Whoever violates these articles of discipline disrupts Party unity.” – Mao Zedong
And now we can add these words to the lineup: “If you’ve got a business, you didn’t build that.  [The federal government] made that happen.”
To the contrary, America’s founders declared an independence from governmental tyranny and taxation over personal business and welfare. For them, America was a republic founded upon “We the People” and the individual pursuit of life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Government was charged with the sole role of protector, not proprietor, of this inalienable right with which all humans are endowed by their Creator.
Thomas Jefferson explained, “The care of human life and happiness, and not their destruction, is the first and only legitimate object of good government.”
And Benjamin Franklin said, “The Constitution only guarantees the American people the right to pursue happiness. You have to catch it yourself.”
Dare I say, if they or any of our founders or framers were alive today, they would say, “If you want a business, you build it. You make it happen.”

'Angel' hovers over Aurora movie theater where 12 were slain



'Angel' hovers over Aurora movie theater where 12 were slain

6 days ago
Look closely at this photo taken right after Sunday's vigil for the victims of the Aurora, Colo., "Dark Knight" massacre, and we're sure you'll agree that there's an image of an angel in the clouds. Crystal Fuller, who snapped the pic, says she didn't notice the heavenly cloud formation until after she'd posted the snap, telling 7NEWS "I noticed it afterwards. I had it posted and said crazy cloud." Then one of her friends said, "It's an angel and I saw it!" Miraculously (or eerily), the angel seems to hover right over the Century 16 movie theater – leading awed commenters to post remarks like "God bless Colorado" and "God works in mysterious ways." [Source)
30 July 2012
http://now.msn.com/angel-seen-in-picture-of-sunday-vigil-for-victims-of-aurora-century-16-massacre

Criminalizing rainwater collection by Oregon ------ Amazing!

Dear NaturalNews readers,

The State of Oregon has declared war on sustainable living and self-reliance by criminalizing rainwater collection.

A man who owns 170 acres of land is now being sent to jail and fined over $1500 for the "crime" of "stealing water from the state" by collecting rainwater on his own land!
This is not a joke. It's yet another example of runaway collectivism that is fast spreading across America.
Importantly, if Oregon can claim ownership of the rainwater that falls on your land, the state could also outlaw solar panels by claiming "sunlight photons" are the property of the state, too!


 

Making Sure We Understand SaLuSa’s Important Annoucement

Making Sure We Understand SaLuSa’s Important Annoucement   

2012 July 30

by Steve Beckow


It’s important to review what SaLuSa and Mike Quinsey have said right out of the starting gate. Stephen has said what I’m about to say here. Andrew has.  But I worry that, even though we’ve been crystal clear, some people will not see it or catch SaLuSa’s drift.
I’m also being compulsive about it because I’ve just been raked through the muck on a particular discussion group for exactly these misunderstandings.  So perhaps we can avoid a repeat by going over the details.
SaLuSa has confirmed what Sierra Neblina said (1) and what the two crop circles at Manton Drove and Windmill Hill have indicated (see below). (2) That is NOT that Disclosure will take place on Aug. 4 or even Aug. 5 necessarily, but that the divine deadline after which the galactics have the ability and authority to decide when to disclose their presence to us passes on August 4.
Here is what SaLuSa actually said:  “Yes, we have the deadline Saturday the 4th. of August in mind and no longer, before we take matters into our own hands.” (3)  SaLuSa amplifies his comment: “Dear Ones, as you are learning from a number of sources, the point has been reached when Divine instructions have been given that action shall be taken without delay to announce our presence.”  He continues:
“We have shown extreme patience and given your leaders plenty of opportunity to take the steps called for to release you from the control of the Illuminati. We know that they too are also like many people in fear of them, but that has to be put aside to allow the truth to come out.”
He goes on to explain that the galactics intend to use the Olympics to the maximum advantage:
“The Olympics is the window that is being given world attention, and we cannot think of a better way to make it known. Time is fast running away and we must be given the opportunity to make ourselves known to you.
“Some will still choose to disbelieve our messages, but that is their free choice which we honor. However, there is the important matter of Ascension and much to do in these final days, and we cannot wait any longer. Our allies have gone as far as can be reasonably expected, and they need complete freedom to go surging ahead with their final responsibilities.”
He then states what all this means: “So very shortly the clearing up process will be able to proceed without further hindrance from the dark Ones.” Notice he did not give a date but only said “very shortly.” The last part of his message I want to give again is his caution to us that our lives are about to be “turned upside down.” In other words, the main events are about to start, the signal we’ve been waiting for.
“Your lives are to some extent to be turned upside down, although many people are already prepared for it. We hope that some leaders will heed our request and not wait until we are forced to intervene, but if we have to we are fully ready.
“The coming period will show those who are of the Light, as they will be able to step forward with our blessing and take the reins from those who are not. We want to stop all actions that are happening or proposed, that are purposefully directed at you the people to limit what little freedom you have left. You do have good souls of the Light that are here at this time to handle such matters.”
He gives this signal to us, I believe, to have us start to adjust to the fact that our time of service is about to begin. In my opinion, he doesn’t give it to us so that we can look for events happening tomorrow or the next day but so that we’ll get ready for them when they do. Mostly that getting ready is an inside job. There may be other external factors to pay attention to but the important thing is to make the inner adjustments and preparations, in my view.
Mike Qunisey adds an additional note to SaLuSa’s message:
“SaLuSa [refers] to the Disclosure date of Saturday the 4th. August as being one of ‘intent’ thus allowing for change if it was proved necessary. The dark Ones would clearly like to use the event for their own agenda, and it has been said that a fake alien attack was planned using real craft and holographic projections.” (4)
I’m not in agreement with Mike that SaLuSa said Aug. 4 would be the day of Disclosure, but what Mike is really saying here anyways is cautioning us against expecting that Disclosure has to happen exactly on Aug. 4.  The intent is the same as what we’re saying here and intent is all that’s really important to me.
We as lightworkers need to understand the complex of factors that goes into choosing the exact right date. We’re close to Disclosure but any factors could result in a delay. That resulting delay does not invalidate anything. It simply says that the galactics are managing a huge operation and may not be able to turn on a dime.
There is one circumstance that favors the choice of Aug. 4th as a date for Disclosure. Certainly if I had the decision-making power, I would choose it. That is that August 4th is President Obama’s birthday.
As far as I’m aware, and I’m not following the Olympics closely (I have a job to do!), he’s still in London. It would be fitting of him to receive the honor of Disclosure. And who knows where the Queen will be when it occurs so Obama becomes the obvious choice of world leader to receive the honor, the Starseed-in-Chief.
The second at Windmill Hill, near Avebury, England, was reported July 27, 2012, and points to August 4 as well.


Footnotes

(1) “Sierra Neblina Takes Us Backstage on Disclosure,” at http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/sierra-neblina-takes-us-backstage-on-disclosure/
(2) “Disclosure Events Moving Fast,” at http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/disclosure-events-moving-fast/
(3) Salusa, July 30, 2012.
(4) “A Special Message from Mike Quinsey: SaLuSa – July 30, 2012,” at http://the2012scenario.com/2012/07/a-special-message-from-mike-quinsey-july-30-2012/

PROPHECIES JESUS CHRIST MADE THE BLIND CHRISTIANS AND THEIR SCHOLARS NEVER NOTICED! From Erasmus of America July 30, 2012


    Matthew 24:44-47: Therefore, be ye also ready: for in such an hour as ye think not the Son of man (Jesus) cometh. Who then is a faithful and wise servant, whom his lord ( Jesus) hath made ruler over his household, to give them meat in due season? Blessed is that servant, (chief steward of Jesus Christ), whom his lord (Jesus) when he cometh shall find so doing. (Chief Steward of Jesus Christ when he appears is secret sign for Christians that Jesus is coming soon! Read it folks!). Verily I(Jesus) say unto you, that he (Jesus) shall make him ruler (chief steward - right hand of Jesus - prime minister to Jesus as Jesus states in Revelation) over all his (Christ's) goods."
     St. Luke 12:42-44: "Who is that faith and wise steward, whom his lord shall make ruler over his household, to give them their portion of meat in due season? Blessed is that servant, whom his lord when he cometh shall find so doing. Of a truth I(Jesus) say unto you, that he(Jesus) will make him ruler over all that he (Jesus) hath."
     Revelation 2:26: "And he that overcometh, and keepeth my works (early Apostolic Christianity) unto the end(means Chief Steward is there just before return of Jesus), to him I(Jesus) will give power (authority of prime minister of Jesus Christ) over the nations." Rev. 2:28: And I (Jesus) will give him (the one willing to be Chief Steward to Jesus) the morning star.: Rev. 22:16: "I Jesus...am the root and offspring of David, and the bright and morning star."
     Matthew 25:10: "and they that were ready went in with him (Jesus) to the marriage: and the door was shut." Matthew 11:13 "Afterward came also the other virgins (symbol for Christians as used by Jesus) saying, Lord (Jesus), Lord (Jesus), open to us. But he (Jesus answered, and said, Verily i say unto you, I know you not. (This according to first Christianity would be spoken at the hidden site for the Garden of Eden also called Paradise still on earth and the entrance to it according to the Old Testament hidden by the Holy Mountain of God Satan was expelled from). "Watch therefore, for ye know neither the day nor the hour wherein the Son of Man (Jesus) cometh."
     Revelation 12: the dragon empire (Nazi Germany) warns against the wilderness (America. Wilderness was common term of first colonists for North America.) The remnant of real Christianity (the woman ) hides in this wilderness for 1,260 days until Nazi Germany is defeated. As Pres. Roosevelt explained to the American people in a "fireside chat" on Dec. 8, 1941 the day after the attack on Pearl Harbor, Nazi Germany ordered Imperial Japan to attack Pearl Harbor as the price of military alliance with Nazi Germany. The Japanese Imperial Fleet left port to begin its attack on Pearl Harbor on Nov. 26, but Nov. 25 Washington time, 1941,  Under military law, Nazi Germany by ordering the attack on Pearl Harbor began the war on Nov. 25, though the attack did not hit Pearl Harbor until Dec. 7. Nazi Germany surrendered to Gen. Eisenhower on May 7, 1945 exactly 1,260 days later as prophesied in Chapter 12 of Revelation. On the Friday evening before Pentecost just before I was 7 years old, what three adults said was the cloven tongues of fire of the Holy Ghost appeared over me and I then knew this explanation for Revelation even though as a small boy then, I had never read the Bible and was still an atheist until 10 1/2 years old. Christians savagely attacked the three prominent American adults who told others about what they had seen. One was a Catholic and won the award for being the top architect in America one year. His wife was Methodist and one of the richest women in America. The third was a prominent socialite and my mother. The American Christians charged the three must have been liars, drunk, on dope, or crazy to claim see the cloven tongues of fire appear over me when just before 7 years old. And surprise, I remember most of what happened but not all that night. The adults filled me in with that small amount I did not remember and the married couple asked me later in military school if I remembered this incident. I said yes I did remember it. They said they felt this was a sign of God that I was destined to be a great champion of Christianity later on in America. My mother who was about to become a Catholic convert felt this sign was for her, not me. I never saw her logic on that point as I received all this knowledge of the Book of Revelation which I had never read in my life at that time. And what I learned then when I was older in age was all verified as historically correct. And let me state bluntly what I learned then by revelation I judge of God is that Wash., D.C. is the most evil government in human history having as my earlier report charged with laughter murdered over 3 billion or more people on earth in the 20th century and thought this a hilarious joke before God whose face Wash., D.C. under Obama fiercely spits in the face of God this very hour!
     Any man or woman who dares vote for or support Obama is supporting the man who in his heart wants to be the Antichrist to kill off all the Jews on earth and kill off all the Christians who do not renounce their faith in Christ. At just before 7 years of age, I did not understand this then but understood that I was in Revelation and the future champion of Apostolic Christianity the churches give lip service to, but carefully avoid supporting too strongly.
     I will give a brief display of knowledge of early Apostolic Christianity the churches and their scholars do not know. Then you decide if you want to support the serious revival of Apostolic Christianity in America and the world, or else shadowbox with evil and when the wise virgin Christains are taken by Jesus into Paradise (early Christianity said where Jesus intended to house them for the prophesied world Tribulation), as St. Jerome who translated the Vulgate version of the Bible around 400 A.D. and top scholar in the Roman Empire then on early Christian writings, twice wrote the foolish virgin Christians will be kicked out by Jesus to face the Antichrist on earth and in utter terror they will flee for their lives across the earth. The wise virgin Christians will be safe with Jesus during the Tribulation and come back out after the Antichrist is crushed by Jesus, and they take over rulership and management of the earth after the evil are purged from the earth by Jesus Christ. How the wise virgin Christians get to be with Jesus during the Tribulation was not really stated by the first Christian writers. Whether by a rapture, a mass migration or other means, they end up at the right location so the Antichrist and all hell on earth is not their problem!
     Most Protestant and Catholic scholars judge Jesus was born 5 B.C. or earlier. They are wrong! Early Christianity wrote that Jesus was born 28 years after the death of Cleopatra of Egypt in 30 B.C. Jesus was born in the 42nd year of the reign of Augustus Caesar. Our Christian scholars of today thought how dumb the early Christian writers were to write such a ridiculous statement in their eyes. I took three years of Latin which included a lot of Roman history while in military school. Octavian Caesar,stepson of Julius Caesar, considered it very smart to list the beginning of his reign from the reading of the Will of Julius Caesar just after he had been murdered in 44 B.C. Subtract 42 years and we end up with the same year as the death of Cleopatra of Egypt reference leads to the birth of Jesus Christ. Of course, Octavian Caesar changed his name to Augustus Caesar and because of the will of Julius Caesar was later able to have the Roman Senate declare him a god of the Roman Empire. I knew how ancient Roman culture worked. The modern Christian scholars so arrogant and dismissing towards the early Christian writers did not know that the modern scholars were the hicks as scholars, not the first ancient scholars of first Apostolic Christianity. The Roman Catholic Church has even said that she does not know the date when Jesus was born. If the sloppy Catholic scholars had seriously read the first writings of Christianity, in the early collection called The Constitutions of the Holy Apostles a Jewish convert to Christianity writes that Jesus was born on the 25th of the ninth month. But modern scholars did not realize he was referring to the Jewish lunar calendar. Its equivalent on the Roman or solar calendar was basically Dec. 25 which was the Jewish holiday of Hanukkah which symbolically means "The Lord dwells among us." I ran across a historical note that the Pharisees judging the Roman calendar was more accurate than the Jewish coordinated their Jewish calendar with the Roman calendar so the Jewish 25th day of the month was the same as the 25th of the Roman calendar. So Jesus Christ was for real born on Hannukah, Dec. 25, and probably 2 B.C. when a formation of planets as I understand it all came together on Dec. 25 and would have shown as a super bright star that night over Bethlehem. Also, the Eastern half of early Christianity used to celebrate the birthday of John the Baptist who was the cousin of Jesus Christ and born 6 months before Jesus according to the New Testament. Add 6 months to the birthday for John the Baptist and we are basically at or very close to Dec. 25. I use common sense in Bible scholarship. Too many do not.
     The Roman Catholic Church knew how to bring defeat from the jaws of victory in some areas. They taught the same doctrine as first Christianity about the bread and water being prayed over becomes by a spiritual mystery the actual flesh and blood of Jesus Christ. They used the fancy word of transubstantiation which had no connection to early Apostolic Christianity and helped break up the unity of Christianity by use of this word. The correct word as early Christianity used 100 years and so after Christ was "transmutation" which is a Latin word meaning changing one substance into another. Look at the famous debate between Justin Martyr and a Jewish scholar around 160 A.D. Justin Martyr referred to this praying over the bread and water as transmutation. Also, the Jewish scholar said the Christians were heretics for worshipping on Sunday instead of Saturday. Justin Martry corrected him that they made Sunday their main day of worship to honor the day that Jesus resurrected from the dead but also worshipped God the other six days also instead of just one day as the Jews did.
     As now both the Protestant and Catholic side suddenly realize, I am a very deadly scholar in what early Apostolic Christianity taught. Jesus was definitely opposed to divorce. However, for the comfort of millions of Christians in America who think they have committed the unforgiveable sin by having divorced their partner in their marriage, Jesus also allowed reasons for divorce. Tertullian Against Marcion around 200 A.D. covered several angles how Christians could be divorced and then remarried, and this not be a sin in the eyes of Jesus Christ. He was one of the most prominent Church Fathers of Early Apostolic Christianity and wrote such as, "Divorce, therefore, when justly deserved, has even in Christ a defender." "He prohibits divorce when He will have the marriage invioolable: He (Jesus) permits when the marriage is spotted with unfaithfulness." Tertullian covered other angles when divorce was permitted such as what the Catholic Church calls "The Pauline Privilege." St. Jerome who translated the Vulgate Bible around 400 A.D. was rated the top scholar on early Christian writings in the Roman Empire. They asked him rather than the Bishop of Rome a powerful question. A very outstanding candidate for Bishop in Spain had been twice married and divorced before becoming a Christian. And now as a Christian, he was married a third time but now as a Christian and with a Christian wife. Could he be allowed to be a Bishop in the Catholic Church with this background? To put it in capsule form, after much study, St. Jerome stated and his judgment became binding on the Catholic Church in the Roman Empire, once baptized a Christian, there was no exception of sin or wrong he could not be forgiven of in the Name of Christ including being married even several times. But now that he was a Christian and married in "the Lord," he should remain the husband of one wife and set the example for all Christians to follow. Yes, he could become a Catholic Bishop and with no sin or moral impediment.
     The early Roman Empire had an abortion drug. The early Christian Church condemned this as murder of the unborn. They ruled for Christianity in 2012 A.D. Epicurus of Greece hundreds of years before Christ taught the Theory of Evolution long before Charles Darwin who merely revived an ancient theory taught in the Roman Empire. Early Christianity condemned the theory of evolution that life evolved from atoms as heresy (religious error) as it denied the Genesis account of the Bible. They successfully discredited the Theory of Evolution back then by arguments such as "Which came first? The bird or the egg? The tree or the seed?" The right answer was God came first as Creator of life and then these cycles of life such as in seed or else eggs got started on earth.
     The New Testament states for Christians to confess their faults before fellow Christians. This grew very embarrasing at times so when great sin was involved, the local pastor was authorized by the local church to act in their name to hear the confession of serious sins and if needed to dictate penance so the sinner stopped this grevious sin. More minor sins were covered by generic public confessions recited by all at the same time in the local church.
     After the Apostles and their first successors appointed the first bishop in any area, the local mother church in the cities were to elect their own bishops meaning overseers. The Church of Rome elected the Bishop of Rome for I think it was a bit over the first 1,000 years and then later ended up with the election by the College of Cardinals.
      Tertullion around 200 A.D. wrote of the ancient Christian custom of making the sign of the cross. Since one of the major denominations called this a "pagan practice" invented by the Catholic Church during the Middle Ages, I expose sloppy Christian scholarship regardless whether Protestant or Catholic side.
     Early Christianity had committees of copyists in their churches. They made copies of the Scriptures so all in their churches could read them when they wanted to and Bible reading was encouraged for all Christians to do. When the Catholic Church tried to forbid Catholics from reading the Bible aroung the time of Martin Luther, they forced the hand of God as God had always had the Christians to use the Bible to expand their knowledge of the teachings of Jesus beyond what was just mentioned in weekly church services. Martin Luther slappped the Catholic Church down for wrong policy, not wrong doctrine, contrary to what early Apostolic Christianity had taught. When Martin Luther went too far and taught that Christians did not have to worry about doing good acts as Christians, he got into hot water with God and early Apostolic Christianity. We are saved by grace of Jesus, but then we do good works from the reborn heart we now have as Christians instead as pagans. As Jesus said the tree that bears no good fruit Jesus will throw away! Is that plain enough?
      I am an economist by training. So this point strongly interested me. I have seen nations in Africa that have 9 children by one woman. This does not take long before the nation has famine, civil war, and other evils occur because the national economy cannot handle this burden of too rapid of population growth. Years ago when living in Wash., D.C., I got ahold of a Jewish reference book on Jewish birth control tactics in Israel 2,000 years ago. They had angles a bit similar to ours and a number of tactics I have not seen in our modern culture. When Jesus lived in the land of Israel, Jesus knew that birth control was widely practiced by the Jews, yet never saw the occasion to denounce it. The Jewish concept was not to deny the God command of "Be fruitful and mutliply," but rather to have responsible parenthood where you wanted children but have them as you could afford to raise them decently as their parents. If Jesus did not condemn this, then neither do I. Some Christian scholars would raise the objection of, "But what about the sin of Onan in Genesis?" He spilled his seed on the ground as the Bible states it, but he had married the wife of his dead brother and in humilation to his pride, he was supposed to by custom raise children in the name of his brother and he not be credited with any sons by marriage. In great anger, he spilled his seed so he could not ever make this wife pregnant his father Judah had ordered him to marry after his brother was killed by the anger of the Lord for being so evil. The Lord then struck him dead because he had no intention of ever raising any children by this wife which would violate the commandment of God "to be fruitful and multiply." The sin as I understand it was the deliberate intention that he would never allow his wife to become pregnant with any children by him. That is the sin here. And two quick points since sex is a tought subject to touch in an article on Apostolic Christianity. Genesis said God made Adam and Eve, not Adam and Steve! Adam and Steve were not designed by God to have sex with each other. Sdam and Eve were! And fornication in the Bible meant to have unlawful sex with foreign flesh. Sex with another outside of marriage was not approved of in either the Old or New Testament. But in the Old Testament, if a man seduced a woman outside of marriage,, then he was honor-bound to marry her to restore her honor as a woman! How I step on toes.!Also, fornication meant marriage was not supposed to be between a member of a race loyal to God to a pagan race, a race which would create the destruction of the culture of your own race based upon the God of the Bible. As Tertullian commented around 200 A.D., you were not supposed to marry a stranger to your God and if in such a marriage, you were allowed to end it by divorce. Similar to the Pauline Privilege taught by the Apostle Paul in the New Testament.
     Tertullium around 200 A.D. wrote how Christian churches were exploding across the Roman Empire. They were generally independently organized and he commented that so long as they taught the same doctrines as the mother churches in the big cities founded by the Apostles, they were also considered equally Apostolic as Christian churches. However, they should strive to join in fellowship with one of the big mother churches in the cities founded by the Apostles once they could.
      As the Treaties of Cyprian (251 A.D.) commented "... He is not joined to the Church who is separate from the Gospel."
     Also, the early Christian churches taught some key teachings from the Old Testament as equally representing the New Testament. Among these would be II Chronicles 15:2: "The Lord is with you while ye be with him:...but if ye forsake him, he will forsake you."
     And as one of the leading Christian Church Fathers commented back in this early era of Christianity, St. John Chrysostom (c. 347-407 A.D.), Bishop of Constantinople, "Nothing so provokes God's anger as the division of the Church."
     Tertullian around 200 A.D. in "Scorpiace" commented on the Last Days as apparently we are living in, "He who had not denied the name of the Lord (meaning True Apostolic Christianity) was delivered from the last trial (world tribulation of the Last Days)."
     Commentaries of Bishop Hippolytus around 212 A.D. or so, "For the soul that is united with Jesus forsakes its faith, it is given over to perpetual death, viz eternal punishment."
     St. Jerome who translated the Vulgate Bible meaning vulgar or common tongue version of the Bible for the Roman Empire once commented, if traditions were passed on in the churches given them by the Apostles of Jesus Christ, then they should honor these traditions in their churches. If later traditions were added to the churches, then the Christians were not honor bound where they had to honor them as binding on them.
     Early Christianity had some toleration for incorrection preaching about Christ. As Phillippians 1:18 taught, Christ is preached rightlty or wrongly, but rejoice for Christ is glorified.
     Tertullian repeated the teaching of the Apostle Paul in Romans that in key areas where essential truths were not sacrified for the sake of unity in the churches, there was plently of room for Christians to have differences of religious views or beliefs. For example, if one wanted to worship on the Lord's Day (Sunday) or else Saturday to observe the old custom of the Sabbath, both could be practiced in Christianity. If one person was a vegetarian and another a meat eater, both would be welcome to attend the same church. In areas that did not challenge fundamental teachings of first Apostolic Christianity, Christians could hold different and opposite beliefs in some areas. In modern terms, the Miracle of the Sun at Fatima in 1917 and message requiring repentance of mankind from mass sin in order to prevent World War II or later World War III, a person did not have to believe later things like this that can not be explained by ordinary means. If a later message is truly from God, it might be smart and bring personal blessings to listen to it. But the Apostolic Christianity delivered us by Christ and the Apostles saved us and we don't need later additions or modifications to be saved by Christ in the Last Days. However, personal comment. Early Christianity said there would be interpreting prophets in the Last Days Christianity. They would not issue new prophecies, but have God-given understanding to understand Bible prophecies of old that could not be understood until the Last Days. For example, Jeremiah 30 predicts the Last Days Community of the elect of God just before the world Tribulation and their governor (founder) would be invited to meet with God while still in the carnal flesh. And he would live because he was invited by God. I think this prophecy refers to the location of the lost city of Enoch rather than Jerusalem because the meeting with God sounds most likely by the Holy Mountain of God mentioned in the Old Testament which is the entrance way to the Garden of Eden also called Paradise. But people never noticed the mention in the Bible that this Mountain of God is by the Garden of Eden. The Garden of Eden never went out of business. It is just hidden from our view like a Space Portal of science fiction put in terms you might understand. I have been over much of the world and I will not say where, but once I visited an area I suspect is the hidden location for the destroyed city of Enoch which would be the oldest city in the world according to Genesis 4. I have a bit of an "Indiana Jones" personality and have successfully cracked already a number of secrets of history. The location of Enoch intrigues me and I found four clues that this might be the City of Enoch destroyed by the Great World Floor. But I will keep secret what I know until the time is right. I have several friends who know what I found and all want to join with me if I go back to the location I found somewhere in the world. The Book of Genesis as I read it pointed a straight arrow to where the lost City of Enoch should be and 4 clues at the site powerfully intrigued me. I may have found another lost city by chance, but I know more than I am going to commit to print. By the way, according to ancient Jewish legend, the largest treasure on the earth should not be too far away from where Enoch is located. But I know more Bible history than most Bible scholars. I am just being frank about this subject.
     One final point and then our visit to Apostolic Christianity must stop here. The Canons of the Fourth Lateran Council, 1215 A.D. which was the largest church council gathering in Christian history up to then ruled that one could be saved outside out of the Church, but not outside of Christ. If validly baptized, you could practice Christianity outside of the formal Church, but you must repent of sins or your baptism will not save you. Also, I think it was clearly understood that if a Church taught you the authentic teachings of Jesus from the Bible, then the Church would be a valuable asset to make you a far better Christian than you could be outside of the official Church.
     Speaking of the True Church, I spent eleven calendar years in military academies and to me it would be illogical for Jesus Christ to found a Church without a central command to it. Early Christianity was heavily governed by councils of bishops elected from their city mother churches. But both the Roman Catholic and Greek Orthodox Catholic admit that Peter was the Bishop of Antioch before going to Rome and joining with Paul to found the powerful Church of Rome. Now Antioch took over the leadership of Christianity in the Middle East after Jerusalem fell to the Roman Army which destroyed much of Jerusalem. This Middle East authority moved upwards until it ended in Constantinople much later on. I recognize both the authority of the Church at Rome and the Church at Constantinople as having come from the Apostle Peter. How I step on toes! Symbolically I ask how Peter of the East could excommunicate Peter of the West or visa versa? I intend to be the bridge between the pride of men of both sides and see we get back the original united Peter Church but heavily governed by church councils as early Apostolic Christianity was. If the Protestants are reforming back to early Apostolic Christianity, then I am the final destination for them. If the two giant Catholic Apostolic founded churches stand for Apostolic Christianity as they claim, then in the end they must consent to the restoration to power of the original Apostolic Constitution which governed all Christianity for the first few hundred years.
     Jesus had a job listing in Chapter 2 in Revelation. I told Jesus the job was now filled and it is time to get the final job done Jesus wants for Christianity. I think Jesus likes my boldness. While others are crying what can we do to save Christianity, I just pick up the script Jesus gave us and say "Let's finish the job now Jesus gave us to do!"
     Pass my Omni Law now like fanatics for Christ. Look up a copy at Nesara News or else ask for a copy from me at email address of fastboomamericaneconomy@gmail.com . Also, funds are welcome so we can steamroll our opposition in America and win America effectively back to Christ. Send checks made out to NIFI and to the address of NIFI, P.O. Box 1465, Seneca, SC 29679 .
     If we have the faith that moves mountains, then we are going to win America back. When I played football, they gave me the nickname of "Guts." When I entered a boxing tournament in military school, soon I had the nickname of "the lion-hearted." I was born with all the guts Christianity needs to storm America now! So soldiers for Christ, what is your excuse now? It is time to storm America and win America for Christ! Yours for God and Country, Eramus of America (pen name briefly. When I hold the winning hand, no need for this pen name any longer! The nation knows that it is rotten in Denmark meaning Wash., D.C. in this case. So let's make America a Christian nation again. Back me seriously and we will storm America now for Christ!)
    

The Plan and What You Can Do





The Plan and What You Can Do

I have received new intel about the Plan.

The Event will be a multidimensional breakthrough for planet Earth that will send waves of Light across the Universe. The Event will be spiritual and physical in nature. It will encompass a breakthrough in removal of non-physical negative entities, mass arrests of the Cabal and drastic increase of sightings of positive UFOs. It will be an unified effort of the Pleiadians, the Resistance Movement, Positive Military, White Dragon Society and other positive groups.

The Event is scheduled for October this year or later.

The Event is only the beginning, then things will go as fast as humanity can integrate. First Contact operations will proceed along with the restructuring of the system. New financial system will be very short lived since after the First Contact money will become obsolete. The Ascension will NOT happen on December 21st. Humanity needs a lot of healing and December 21st is just the beginning of the Ascension process.


The main reason why mass arrests of the Cabal did not happen within the April to June timeframe is that the Positive Military was not aware of Archons until recently and did not integrate them in their 35+ years old plan. The other reason was that positive groups got heavily infiltrated by the Cabal.

Nothing spectacular will happen on August 4th. 

There will be a gradual increase of number of UFO sightings during August / September period. The hostage situation around humanity is slowly being resolved, the ships of Pleiadians and other positive civilizations of Light are progressing towards the surface of planet Earth.

To explain from my last post, Magdalenian Archons invasion was an invasion  that ended peaceful Gravettian Goddess worshiping paleolithic high culture more than 16,000 years ago and started Magdalenian hunting paleolithic tribal society.

Many people would like to become more active and are asking me what to do.

First, you can join weekly liberation meditations.

Second, you can distribute information.

Third, you can spread the beauty of your Soul.

Many people have asked to join the Resistance. This is not possible at this point. Only few extremely well trained agents of the Resistance are now operating on the surface of the planet. After the Event, the Resistance will gradually make itself known to the general public.

I have received reports from some people that they can not post comments in my blog. I do not know the reason for this. I hope it is just a technology glitch and not the Cabal interfering with us. I rarely delete comments and I do so only when they are extremely negative and counterproductive. The comments section in my blog has evolved into a sacred space where awakened beings can share ideas and revelations.


Citigroup Creator Says Break Up The Big Banks

Citigroup Creator Says Break Up The Big Banks

By Robert Morris

The banking industry was sucker punched late last week by an unlikely assailant.  Former Citigroup Chairman and CEO, Sanford "Sandy" Weill, appeared on CNBC's Squawk Box and called for breaking up America's big banks.

Here's what he said...
"What we should probably do is go and split up investment banking from banking.  Have banks be deposit takers, have banks make commercial loans and real estate loans, have banks do something that's not going to risk the taxpayer dollars, that's not too big to fail."
Essentially, Mr. Weill called for reinstatement of the Glass Steagall Act.

Also called the Banking Act of 1933, Glass Steagall was a key piece of legislation passed during the Great Depression.  This groundbreaking law created the FDIC and imposed bank reforms for controlling speculation.

But it's best remembered for prohibiting banks from engaging in both commercial banking and investment banking activities... that is, until its repeal in 1999.

So, why are Weill's comments so shocking?

In case you don't know, Mr. Weill was once the driving force behind the repeal of Glass Steagall.

I remember it well.

At the time, I was working as a stockbroker for Salomon Smith Barney, which was then part of insurance giant, Traveler's Group.  Mr. Weill was not only the Chairman and CEO of Traveler's, he was also my boss.

In those days, Mr. Weill had a single-driving purpose... to create the world's first Financial Supermarket.

He wanted to build a financial conglomerate that could offer commercial banking, investment banking, securities trading, and insurance.  He believed such a firm would be well-diversified against risk and could generate earnings growth in the high teens annually.

And in 1998, his dream finally became reality.

That year, Mr. Weill engineered the mega-merger between two of the world's largest financial institutions - Traveler's and Citicorp.  The highly publicized marriage created Citigroup (C) and effectively reunited commercial banking and investment banking activities under one roof for the first times since Glass Steagall was enacted in 1933.

The following year, Glass Steagall was repealed by Congress.

The irony is poignant.

Mr. Weill is now calling for reinstating the barrier between commercial and investment banking that he previously demolished.

Despite the irony, however, I happen to agree with him.

There's no doubt the repeal of Glass Steagall paved the way to the financial crisis of 2007.  If the law had still been in place, we wouldn't have had the "too big to fail" financial behemoths - Citigroup, JPMorgan Chase (JPM), Bank of America (BAC), Morgan Stanley (MS) - that nearly destroyed the global financial system.

Robert Kuttner said it best in his book, The Alarming Parallels Between 1929 and 2007...

The repeal of Glass Steagall permitted "super-banks" to "re-enact the same kinds of structural conflicts of interest that were endemic in the 1920's", such as "lending to speculators, packaging and securitizing credits and then selling them off, wholesale or retail, and extracting fees at every step along the way."

Sound familiar?

Of course, members of the banking industry were quick to disagree with Mr. Weill. And a couple of former bank CEOs even went on record...

William Harrison, a prior CEO of JPMorgan Chase, said, "I don't buy it... It gets back to management and risk-taking, and you can screw that up at a small bank or a large bank."

And retired Wells Fargo CEO, Richard Kovacevich had this to say, "There is this conventional wisdom that big is bad or risky... I don't think there is any evidence that this is the case.  Banks fail mainly because of concentration of risk."

But these former titans are clearly missing the point.

Yes, bank failures can happen to any size bank if it's not managed properly.  But a small bank failure is not going to threaten the stability of the financial system.

In contrast, we've seen what happens when banks who have grown too big to fail are allowed to engage in excessive risk-taking.  You get a financial crisis that nearly destroys the global financial system.

I have to say I'm with Mr. Weill on this issue.  Let's re-impose the barriers between commercial and investment banking that kept our system safe for 66 years.

Profitably Yours,



Robert Morris

Geithner on LIBOR: 'We Were Aware'

Geithner on LIBOR: 'We Were Aware' 30 July 2012

Published on Jul 25, 2012 by WSJDigitalNetwork

Treasury Secretary Timothy Geithner testifies before the House Financial Services Committee on LIBOR and risks to the U.S. economy. Sudeep Reddy reports on Markets Hub.
 
Source: YouTube.com.

MPs tell Barclays to stop fundraising for Mitt Romney

MPs tell Barclays to stop fundraising for Mitt Romney   

30 July 2012

·         Amelia Hill and Rupert Neate
guardian.co.uk

·         Wednesday 25 July 2012 13.27 EDT

Bank at centre of Libor-setting scandal says it is non-partisan and donations are made by employees in a personal capacity


Mitt Romney is in the UK for a fundraising dinner and to attend the Olympics. Photograph: James Glover/Reuters
·         Bank at centre of Libor-setting scandal says it is non-partisan and donations are made by employees in a personal capacity

US government ran chemical experiments on military veterans

US government ran chemical experiments on military veterans under operations MKUltra, Bluebird and Artichoke

Thursday, July 26, 2012 by: J. D. Heyes

(NaturalNews) The United States, for its warts, has achieved much in its short 230-plus year history. It is a benevolent world superpower, for the most part, that serves as a beacon of hope and freedom for an increasingly oppressed world, even as it serves as a guardian against tyranny for as many as half of the world's nearly seven billion people.

But a few chapters in our history - slavery, oppression of the Native American tribes, causes of the civil rights movement, and moments of unconstitutionality on the part of our elected leaders - serve as more than simple blemishes on an otherwise admirable record of defending liberty and freedom. One such stain is the way we've treated some of our nation's military veterans.

The maltreatment is summed up in a recent federal case. In late July, a group of veterans managed to win a court order forcing the U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs to hand over a trove of documents detailing the department's alleged Cold War-era drug experiments on Vietnam vets. What's problematic about this case isn't the decision - the VA owes these veterans any answers they are seeking - but the fact that the case had to be filed at all.

'Project Paperclip'

According to court documents, U.S. Magistrate Judge Jacqueline Scott Corley, in Oakland, Calif., said in her ruling that the documents requested by the veteran-plaintiffs were "squarely relevant" to their claim that the government, through the VA, did not adequately notify veterans of chemicals they were purposely exposed to during experimentation, and - perhaps more importantly - what effects that exposure might have had on their physical and mental health.

Details of this sad episode in our history were contained in a 2009 class action suit. Filed by the Vietnam Veterans of America and individual soldiers, the suit charges the U.S. Army and the Central Intelligence Agency, with the help of former Nazi scientists, of using at least 7,800 vets as guinea pigs to test the effects of as many as 400 different types of drugs and chemicals. They included mescaline (psychedelic alkaloid), LSD (psychedelic drug), amphetamines, barbiturates, nerve agents and mustard gas.

The suit also says the government worked to cover up the testing and the nature of its experiments, which began in the 1950s under such exotic code names as "Bluebird," "Artichoke" and MKUltra."

The government launched "Project Paperclip," the suit alleges, an all-out effort by the Army and CIA to allegedly recruit former Nazi scientists to help test various psycho-chemicals, as well as develop a new truth serum using the nation's own vets as test subjects, Courthouse News Service reported.

"Over half of these Nazi recruits had been members of the SS or Nazi Party," said the class-action suit. "The 'Paperclip' name was chosen because so many of the employment applications were clipped to immigration papers."

According to Colin A. Ross, a psychiatrist and author of "The CIA Doctors," said he pored over more than 15,000 documents he received from the nation's premier spy agency detailing the "mind control" operations which he said took place between 1950-1972 "at many leading universities including Harvard, Yale, Cornell, Johns Hopkins and Stanford."

The goal, simply, is mind control

In a report posted on the Citizens Commission on Human Rights International's Web site, Ross said "MKUltra and related programs had several over-lapping purposes."

"One was to purchase mind control drugs from suppliers. Another was to form relationships with researchers who might later be used as consultants at the TOP SECRET level," he wrote. "The core purpose of these programs was to learn how to enhance interrogations, erase and insert memories, and create and run Manchurian Candidates."

Ross said all of that is documented "clearly and explicitly" in the declassified CIA documents he obtained, though he said it was merely "a glimpse into the tip of the iceberg of CIA and military mind control."

"The experimental subjects were not told the real purpose of the experiments, did not give informed consent, were not afforded outside counsel and received no meaningful follow-up," he wrote. "As described by the psychiatrists in published papers, experiments with LSD and other hallucinogens, combined with sensory deprivation, electroshock and other interrogation techniques, resulted in psychosis and death among other 'side effects.' The purpose of these experiments was to see how easily a person could be put into a psychotic state or controlled."

In a review of the MKUltra program, which was launched in 1953, Wired.com said its goal was, simply, mind-control.

"1953: The agency launches one of its most dubious covert programs ever, turning unsuspecting humans into guinea pigs for its research into mind-altering drugs," said the report, which said then-Central Intelligence Agency director Allen Dulles authorized the program.

"Dulles wanted to close the 'brainwashing gap' that arose after the United States learned that American prisoners of war in Korea were subjected to mind-control techniques by their captors," said Wired.com.

Programmable assassins

"Loathe to be outdone by foreign enemies, the CIA sought, through its research, to devise a truth serum to enhance the interrogations of POWs and captured spies. The agency also wanted to develop techniques and drugs - such as 'amnesia pills' - to create CIA superagents (sic) who would be immune to the mind-control efforts of adversaries."

The creation of so-called Manchurian Candidates - a programmable assassin, essentially - was also a goal of the program.

Besides drug and chemical experimentation, the program included the use of radiological implants, hypnosis and subliminal persuasion, electroshock therapy and isolation techniques, the report said.

In their suit, the vets level similar charges - that the government was attempting to develop and test substances capable of inducing mind control, euphoria, altered personalities, confusion, physical paralysis, mania, illogical thinking and other effects.

Many of the experiments, the suit says, were conducted at Army facilities at Edgewood Arsenal and Ft. Detrick, Md. Some left a number of veterans saddled with debilitating health problems for decades to follow. Worse, the veterans say the government has neglected to provide follow-up medical care to mitigate the damages.

Some soldiers died from the testing, while others suffered physical and mental ailments including seizures and paranoia, an earlier ruling in the case noted.

In this latest bid for full disclosure, the VVA sought documents from the government that reveal the VA's processes of identifying and notifying soldiers who may have been exposed to the chemical and biological tests.

No relevant medical purposes

In arguing against releasing the documents, attorneys for the VA said the agency should be exempted from doing so by the deliberative process privilege, which aims to shield the decision-making processes of government agencies.

Judge Corley did not buy the argument, ruling instead that that veterans group and others "have demonstrated a sufficient, substantial need to overcome the qualified deliberative process privilege."

"The Court agrees that considerable discovery has been provided on this subject; however, having reviewed the thousands of pages of documents submitted for in camera review, the Court notes that these processes are far from clear or consistent, and in fact, seem to have undergone numerous modifications over time," she wrote.

Corley ordered the VA to release more than 40 documents, which she said were "both relevant and unavailable from other sources given that the documents reflect processes which have evolved over time."

 Writes Ross, "The purpose of mind control experiments is controlling human behavior: making enemy combatants open up during interrogation; protecting secret information by erasing memories; making spies more resistant to interrogation because secret information is held by hidden identities and making people more prone to influence, social control and suggestion.

"The mind control experiments and operational programs violate basic human rights and all codes of medical ethics," he said.

The government should never use American citizens or others for any sort of experimentation, at least without first getting consent. Using those who protect and defend us for the same is unspeakable.

Sources:

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/07/23/48617.htm

http://www.cchrint.org/tag/project-bluebird/

http://www.wired.com/dangerroom/2009/01/mkultra-lawsuit/

http://www.courthousenews.com/2012/04/09/45455.htm


Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/036598_chemical_experiments_MKUltra_military_veterans.html#ixzz2282JhSIZ