Darrell Frech: "Civics Lesson"

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Darrell Frech: "Civics Lesson"

Posted By: hobie [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 30-Jan-2013 00:06:42

(Thanks, M. :) Reader M. forwards to us: *************************************************************************** ----- Forwarded Message ----- From: Darrell Frech Sent: Tuesday, January 29, 2013 5:25 AM Subject: Fw: Civics Lesson Michelle : Do you think you could forward this message to Rmn-hobie? Darrell Subject: Civics Lesson 1. Civics - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Civics Civics is the study of the theoretical and practical aspects of citizenship, its rights and duties; the duties of citizens to each other as members of a political body and to the government.[1] It includes the study of civil law and civil code, and the study of government with attention to the role of citizens ― as opposed to external factors ― in the operation and oversight of government. A forwarded message of a forwarded message to a few who might understand it Original publication date: Tuesday, August 21, 2012 Source found at http://poorrichards-blog.blogspot.com/2012/08/proof-bar-attorneys-are-agents-of.html Forwarded: Monday, January 28, 2013 3:11 PM Subject: PROOF: “BAR” attorneys are AGENTS of a FOREIGN power and most of them KNOW it. ATTENTION ALL ATTORNEYS “AT” (against) LAW: You can either cease and desist now – or face the wrath of the now stirring masses when they come to full consciousness! Judgment day is coming! THE BARCARD AS PER THE UNITED STATES SUPREME COURT; “The practice of law CAN NOT be licensed by any state/State.” (Schware v. Board of Examiners, 353 U.S. 238, 239) The practice of Law is AN OCCUPATION OF COMMON RIGHT!” (Sims v. Aherns, 271 S. W. 720 (1925)). The “CERTIFICATE” from the State Supreme Court ONLY authorizes, to practice Law “IN COURTS” as a member of the STATE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT, and the holders of these “certificates” can ONLY represent WARDS OF THE COURT, INFANTS, PERSONS OF UNSOUND MIND (SEE CORPUS JURIS SECUNDUM, VOLUME 7, SECTION 4.) The “STATE BAR” CARD IS NOT A LICENSE!!! It is a “UNION DUES CARD”. The “BAR” is a “PROFESSIONAL ASSOCIATION.” 1. Like the Actors Union, Painters Union etc. 2. No other association, EVEN DOCTORS, issue their own license. ALL ARE ISSUED BY THE STATE. Therefore, the “STATE BAR” card is a NON-GOVERNMENTAL PRIVATE ASSOCIATION. Therefore, the State Bar is: an Unconstitutional Monopoly; AN ILLEGAL & CRIMINAL ENTERPRISE, and, as such, Violates Article 2, Section 1, Separation of Powers clause of the U. S. Constitution. There is NO POWER OR AUTHORITY for joining of the Legislative, Judicial or Executive branches within a state as the BAR I attempting to do. “BAR” members have invaded all branches of government, and are attempting to control de jure governments as agents of a foreign entity! It is quite simple to see that a great fraud and conspiracy has been perpetrated on the people of America. The American Bar is an offshoot from the London Lawyers’ Guild, and was established by people with invasive monopolistic goals in mind. In 1909 they incorporated this TRAITOROUS group in the state of Illinois, and had the State Legislature (which was under the control of lawyers) pass an unconstitutional law that only members of this powerful union of lawyers, called the “ABA”, could practice law, and hold all the key positions in law enforcement, and the making of laws. At that time, Illinois became an outlaw state, and for all practical purposes, they seceded from the United States of America. The “BAR ASSOCIATION” then sent organizers to all the other states and explained to the lawyers there how much more profitable and secure it would be for them, as lawyers, to join this union and be protected by it by laws and cannons. They issued to the lawyers in each state a charter from the Illinois organization. California joined in 1927, and a few reluctant states and their lawyers waited until the 1930’s to join when the treasonous Act became DE FACTO and the Citizens became captives. Under this system, the lawyers could guarantee prejudged decisions for the privileged class against the lower class. This was all made possible by the AMERICAN BAR ASSOCIATION to favor the right, and have unlawfully substituted them in place of Constitutional Laws. The Constitution was written in plain English, and the Statutes passed by Congress were also in plain English, with the intent of Congress of how each law should be used, and the opinions various Judges as the codes list. Any normal person can read the Constitution and the Statutes and understand them without any trouble. The public in California was shocked to learn that the State Government has no control or jurisdiction of the Bar Association or its members. The state does not accredit the law schools or hold Bar examinations. They do not issue state licenses to LAWYERS. The Bar Association accredits all the law schools, holds their private examination, and selects the students they will accept in their organization, and issues them so-called license, but keeps the fees for themselves The Bar is the only one that can punish or disbar a Lawyer. They also select the lawyers that they consider qualified for Judgeships, and various other offices in the State. Only the Bar Association, or their designated committees, can remove any of these lawyers from public office. The State Legislature will not change this system as they are also a designated committee of the Bar. On August 21, 1984, Rose Bird, Chief Justice of the California State Supreme Court, another of the Bar Associations Judicial Committee’s, stated in essence that the Bar should determine the legality of all initiatives before they were allowed to go on the ballot. This is contrary to both State and Federal Constitutions, as well as the Laws of this Nation instituted By and For the People as a Sovereign UNITE of independent States of We the People, not a fraudulent Corporate entity of Lawyers. This is a tremendous amount of power for a PRIVATE union that is incorporated and headquartered in Illinois to hold over the Citizens of California or any other state. The only recourse if through this initiative process, and vote by the people. After the Founding Fathers had formed the Constitution, outlining the laws as to the way our government was to be run, Thomas Jefferson said, in essence, This proves that plain people, if given the chance, can enact laws and run a government as well as or better than royalty, and the blue bloods of Europe.” The American people must stop thinking that lawyers are better than they are, and can do a better job than they can before the courts of America. Under the Common Law and the Laws of America, no where is it expressly given for anyone to have the power or the right to form a Corporation. “Corporations” are given birth because of ignorance on the part of the American people, and are operating under implied consent and power which they have usurped and otherwise stolen from the people. By RIGHT AND LAW THEY HAVE NO PORWER, AUTHORITY OR JURISDICTION, and must be put out of business by the good Citizens of America in their fight for FREEDOM. The U. S. Constitution GUARANTEES to every state in this union a REPUBLICAN form of government. Any other form of government is FORBIDDEN. No public officer or branch of government be limited to a RULING CLASS of any kind, or the states become ARISTOCRACIES, and NOT Republics. Also the lawyers have made themselves 1st Class Citizens, where many public offices and branches of government are open to lawyers only. All other people are limited to only two (2) branches of government, and even then, to only certain offices in those two branches of government, making all people who are non-lawyers into 2nd class citizens. When the courts belong to the people, as the United States Constitution REQUIRES (Art. IV, paragraph 4) we the people will NEVER rule against themselves. In these unconstitutional foreign tribunal “courts” (hoodlum centers), men in black dresses that are Unconstitutional ROBES OF NOBILITY. (Art. 1, paragraphs 9 and 10) dispense a perverted ideology, where the people are terrorized by members of the BLACK ROBE CULT (lawyers and lawyer judges in the courtrooms). The Legislative Branch of Government does NOT have the Constitutional Power to issue Court Orders or any other kind of Orders to the people, as a “fiction court” or a “court/corporation for profit and gain” cannot reach parity with a lawful man. Only Presidents and Governors have the Constitutional Power to grant PARDONS, but lawyers and layer-judges are unconstitutional granting PARDONS with “immunity from prosecution.” Citizens are not permitted to act like people in the courts. The Citizen (2nd class) is told that he does not know how to fill out fancy lawyer forms; that he is not trained in the law; that he does not know court rules and procedures, etc. This is Unconstitutional “lawyer system,” only HEARSAY SUBSTITUTES (lawyers) NOT under oath, have access to the fiction/for profit and gain courts, even though ONLY sworn testimony and evidence can be presented in court. Anything else is a “Bill of Attainder” NOT permitted under the U. S. Constitution (Article 1, Sections 9 and 10). The U. S. Constitution does NOT give anyone the right to a lawyer or the right to counsel, or the right to any other HEARSAY SUBSTITUTE. The 6th Amendment is very SPECIFIC, that the accused ONLY has the right to ASSISTANCE of counsel, and this can be anyone the ACCUSED CHOOSES WITHOUT LIMITATION LAWYERS & LAWYER-JUDGES created Unconstitutional “lawyer system” pre-trial “motions” and “Hearings” to have eternal EXTORTIONISTIC litigation’s which is BARRATRY and also is in violation of the U. S. Constitution, (Art. 1earings to have eternam EXTORTIONISTIC As this places defendants in DOUBLE JEOPARDY a hundred times over. Defendants only have a right to A TRIAL, NOT TRIALS. When a criminal is freed on a TECHNICALITY, HE IS FREED BECAUSE OF A FIX, and a PAY-OFF; as a defendant can only be freed if found innocent BY A JURY, NOT BY ANY “TECHNICALITY”. Whenever a lawyer is involved in a case, directly or indirectly, as a litigant or assisting in counsel, ALL LAWYER-JUDGES HAVE TO DISQUALIFY THEMSELVES, AS THERE CANNOT BE A CONSTITUTIONAL TRIAL. Also there would be a violation of the conflict of interest laws, along with the violation of separation of powers and checks and balances, because “OFFICERS” OF THE COURT ARE ON BOTH SIDES OF THE BENCH. These same LAWYER-JUDGES are awarding or approving LAWYER FEES, directly and indirectly, amounting to BILLIONS OF DOLLARS annually, all in violation of conflict of interest laws. As long as there are lawyers, there will never be any law; Constitution or Justice. There will only be MOB RULE, RULE BY A MOB OF LAWYERS. CASE “LAW” IS UNCONSTITUTIONAL BECAUSE CASE “LAW” IS ENACTED BY THE JUDICIAL BRANCH OF GOVERNMENT. When a lawyer-judge instructs, directs, or gives orders, the lawyer-judge is TAMPERING WITH THE JURY. He also tampers with testimony when he orders the answers to be either “Yes” or “No”. The lawyer judge also tampers, fixes and rigs the trial when he orders anything stricken from the record, or when he “rules” certain evidence and/or the truth to be inadmissible. This makes the trial and transcript FIXED AND RIGGED because the jury does not hear the REAL TRUTH AND ALL OF THE FACTS. Juries are made into puppets by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. All lawyers are automatically in the judicial branch of government as they have the Unconstitutional TITLE OF NOBILITY (article 1, Sections 9 & 10). “Officer of the Court” Citizens have to be elected or hired to be in any branch of government, but non-lawyer Citizens are limited to only two of the three branches of government. Lawyers, as 1st class citizens, can be elected or hired to any of the three branches of government. “Lawyers” as “Officers of the Court” Lawyers in the Judicial Branch are unconstitutionally in two branches of government at the SAME TIME whenever they are hired or elected to the executive or the legislative branches of government. This is a violation of the separation of powers, checks and balances, and the conflict of interest laws. District attorneys and State’s attorneys have taken over the Grand Juries FROM the people, where the people are DENIED ACCESS to the Grand Juries when they attempt to present evidence of crimes committed in the courtrooms, by the lawyers and lawyer-judges. The U. S. Constitution, being the Supreme Fundamental Law, is not and CANNOT be ambiguous as to be interpreted, or it would be a worthless piece of paper, and we would have millions of interpretation (Unconstitutional amendments) instead of the few we have now. That is why all judges and public servants are SWORN TO SUPPORT the U. S. Constitution, not interpret it, Under INTERNATIONAL ORDERS, ALL LAWYERS, whether they left law school yesterday or fifty (50) years ago, are EXACTLY THE SAME. All lawyers have to file the same motions, and follow the same procedures in using the same Unconstitutional “lawyer system”. In probate, the lawyers place themselves in everyone’s will and estate. When there are minor children as heirs, the lawyer-judges appoint a lawyer (usually a child molesting faggot) for EACH CHILD, AND, AT TIMES, the lawyer fees EXCEED the total amount of the estate. An OUTRAGEOUS amount of TAX “MONEY” is directly and indirectly STOLEN BY LAWYERS. Money that is budgeted to County/City/Borough Boards, school boards and other local and federal agencies eventually finds its way into the pockets of lawyers, as ALL o these agencies are “TRICKED” & “FORCED” into ETERNAL EXTORTIONISTIC LITIGATION. In the states of Alaska and Hawaii, the Bar Associations have mandated that all judges are to be licensed to practice law (e. g. Alaska Constitution, Art. IV, Section 4). This license requirement is not found in any other state of the Union. As all licenses to practice law in the states of Alaska and Hawaii are issued by a judge, what judge is qualified to issue a license to practice law to another judge? As only members of the Bar may be licensed to practice law (e.g. A.L.)* 08.08. 020). Alaska and Hawaii judges are REQUIRED to be members of the BAR, and, as such, they are prejudiced to do the business of the Bar. If a judge is required to be a member of the Bar, who disqualifies the judge from office if that judge does not pay the dues or violates the rules of the Bar? Every state in the Union (with the exception of Alaska and Hawaii) prohibits judges from holding licenses to practice law. Credit to: I am TDC Katman. ARR. LSS International Freedom Foundation 1. poorrichard's blog: PROOF: "BAR" attorney's are AGENTS of a ... poorrichards-blog.blogspot.com/.../proof-bar-attorneys-are-agents-of...Cached You +1'd this publicly. Undo Aug 21, 2012 – Credit to: I am TDC. Katman. ARR. LSS. International Freedom Foundation http:// www.iff -ifoundfreedom.com. Posted by poorrichard at 9:01 AM ... 2. CHAPTER 13 MANDAMUS | DAMNITMAN!! What's UP With That? damitmanwhatsupwiththat.blogspot.com/.../chapter-13-mandamus.ht...Cached You +1'd this publicly. Undo May 3, 2012 – Date: Tuesday, 21-Aug-2012 17:10:59. Found this at poorrichards blog http:// poorrichards-blog.blogspot.ca/ ******* TDC. Katman. ARR. LSS. 3. armed and ready http://www.dualsportridersoflouisiana.com/ › ... › Off TopicCached You +1'd this publicly. Undo 1 post - 1 author - Dec 8, 2011 I am TDC. Katman. ARR. LSS. International Freedom Foundation http://www.iff/ - ifoundfreedom.com. Willful blindness & ignorance of the law is a ... Get more discussion results 4. Fwd: This Just In - Fitt to be Tied - Listen to Catherine Austin Fitts as ... meetup.com/tlcdallas/messages/41976592/Cached You +1'd this publicly. Undo Sep 25, 2012 – I am TDC. Katman. ARR. LSS. International Freedom Foundation http://www.iff/ - ifoundfreedom.com. Willful blindness & ignorance of the law is a ... 5. 165 - News aggregator | Winter Patriot Community Blog winterpatriot.com/aggregator/bluegal-aka-fran/john.../void(0)?... You +1'd this publicly. Undo Aug 21, 2012 – TDC. Katman. ARR. LSS.International Freedom Foundation ATTENTION ALL ATTORNEY'S "AT" [against] LAW: You can either cease and ... 6. [DOC] MTT – US Supreme Court in Massichusetts states forclosure midnightthinktank.com/.../MTT-US-Supreme-Court-in-Massichusetts... You +1'd this publicly. Undo File Format: Microsoft Word - Quick View I am TDC. Katman. ARR. LSS. International Freedom Foundation http://www.iff/ - ifoundfreedom.com. Willful blindness & ignorance of the law is a just cause of ...

World-wide save the Bees campaign !

Breaking news!! Europe’s leaders could move to ban bee killing pesticides in 48 hours. Click to sign and send this to everyone — let’s build a 2-million-strong swarm and make our voices heard before they meet Dear friends, Bees around the world are dying off and Europe’s food watchdog just said certain pesticides are part of the problem. We’ve got 48 hours before key meetings — let’s get a 2-million-person swarm to save the bees. Sign the petition Quietly, globally, billions of bees are dying, threatening our crops and food. But in 48 hours the European Union could move to ban the most poisonous pesticides, and pave the way to a global ban that would save bees from extinction. Four EU countries have begun banning these poisons, and some bee populations are already recovering. Days ago the official European food safety watchdog stated for the first time that certain pesticides are fatally harming bees. Now legal experts and European politicians are calling for an immediate ban. But Bayer and other giant pesticide producers are lobbying hard to keep them on the market. If we build a huge swarm of public outrage now, we can push the European Commission to put our health and our environment before the profit of a few. We know our voices count! Last year, our 1.2 million strong petition forced US authorities to open a formal consultation on pesticides — now if we reach 2 million, we can persuade the EU to get rid of these crazy poisons and pave the way for a ban worldwide. Sign the urgent petition and send this to everyone — Avaaz and leading MEPs will deliver our message ahead of this week’s key meeting in Brussels: http://www.avaaz.org/en/hours_to_save_the_bees/?bPcFmcb&v=21421 Bees don’t just make honey, they are vital to life on earth, every year pollinating 90% of plants and crops — with an estimated $40bn value and over one-third of the food supply in many countries. Without immediate action to save bees, many of our favourite fruits, vegetables, and nuts could vanish from our shelves. Recent years have seen a steep and disturbing global decline in bee populations — some bee species are already extinct and some US species are at just 4% of their previous numbers. Scientists have been scrambling for answers and now the European Food Safety Authority is saying that toxic chemicals called neonicotinoid pesticides could be responsible for the bee deaths. France, Italy, Slovenia and even Germany, where the main manufacturer Bayer is based, have banned one of these bee-killing pesticides. But Bayer continues to export its poison across the world. Now the issue is coming to a boil. EU parliamentarians are stepping up their pressure on the European Commission and key governments to push new legislation to ban the deadly pesticides, and we can offer them the public support they need to counter the powerful pesticide lobby. Sign the urgent petition to Europe’s leaders, then forward this email widely: http://www.avaaz.org/en/hours_to_save_the_bees/?bPcFmcb&v=21421 Our world is beset with threats to what makes it habitable, and to what fills it with wonder. The Avaaz community comes together to defend both — large or small. Whether winning a battle to keep the International Whaling Commission from sanctioning the murder of these giants, or saving bees, the tiny creatures upon which so much depends, we will come together and stand up for the world we all want. With hope, Avaaz team SOURCES Pesticides pose danger to bees (European Voice) http://www.europeanvoice.com/article/2013/january/pesticides-pose-danger-to-bees/76158.aspx Crop pesticides are ‘killing our bees’ – says MEP (Public Service Europe) http://www.publicserviceeurope.com/article/3007/crop-pesticides-are-killing-our-bees-says-mep#ixzz2JGICse6a Death knell for nerve agent pesticides in move to save bees (Independent) http://www.independent.co.uk/environment/nature/death-knell-for-nerve-agent-pesticides-in-move-to-save-bees-8454443.html Give Bees a Chance! (The Greens European Free Alliance) http://www.greens-efa.eu/give-bees-a-chance-9012.html Studies fault Bayer in bee die-off (Christian Science Monitor) http://www.csmonitor.com/Science/2012/0406/Studies-fault-Bayer-in-bee-die-off

A definite recommend read by ALL Americans

A definite recommend read by ALL Americans ......................

********************************************************************

The decision by the Washington, D.C. appeals court against Obama on January 25 has implications far beyond what most media coverage has mentioned.  Below are the remarks of Lyndon LaRouche at his webcast that day, followed by the LaRouche  PAC report on the decision.

LYNDON LAROUCHE: Well, there was some very interesting news that was given to me today, earlier, and that is that I never have seen in my life such a parade of implicit indictments of a President of the United States as was reported to me today.  I'm not going to comment on the details of this report, but I simply say that it comes as a blessed sign from Heaven or something like that, and it should be greeted as such.

It's obvious, what is obvious, without going into the details which were better stated by relevant legal and judicial authorities than by me, but I can say that what I've heard today -- and I do understand what I've heard -- that this is probably the greatest indictment of an incumbent President of the United States that I've ever heard.  If there's one that occurred [more] ominous than this one, I don't know what it was, and I think I know the history of the United States pretty well. But that comes not as a finality of anything, because this situation is subject to all kinds of reversals back and forth, but the fact that such a counter to the President's behavior has been stated publicly by a Federal court is, in itself, a very important development, even without trying to interpret what has been said. 

But the implications of it, as any plain language review of it would say, is this man has been slapped down back and forward repeatedly through the whole reading of these charges. And that does mean there is a qualitative shift in the political situation inside the United States, which the reading of these charges, conclusions I presume, have been delivered. 

I don't think any President could withstand what has been read against him with such precision, in the history of the United States. Some people may have hated someone more than they hated this fellow, but they certainly have placed the charges, and I don't think that without the equivalent of some kind of coup d'etat in support of the President, that he can withstand this. If these charges are presented and they're concluded and if the consequences follow, this man is probably on the way out of office, barely since the time he was re-installed in it. So that's probably a double whammy in this case.

What this does show, with conclusion, which I can speak to on that account, is that after these charges have been placed and reported by the Federal court, that this President is in deep trouble and that much is clear. Now what it means for the rest of us is that the situation was so bad, in terms of the Congress, that the Congress should have delivered precisely these kinds of charges beforehand and, undoubtedly, there were people inside the Congress, particularly the Senate, who would have proceeded on these charges if encouraged to do so.

I think that has to be considered a factor, that all the ideas that some how Obama has come off clean on the basis of his re-installation as President, that that is in doubt now. I don't believe that any President, unless he has the powers to conduct a coup d'etat, could remain in office under the continuation of the list of charges which have been presented as conclusions by the Federal court.

http://larouchepac.com/node/25298

Court of Appeals Strikes Down Obama's Violation of Constitutional Separation of Powers

January 26th, 2013 • 12:11 PM

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a 47-page ruling today, Jan. 25, 2013, upholding the U.S. Constitution against Executive branch violation of the Constitutional separation of powers, in its ruling that President Obama violated the Constitution in making recess appointments when the Senate was, indeed, in session.

The import of the decision extends far beyond the specific case which engendered that decision, as the Court recognized when it stated from the outset, that "while the posture of the petition is routine, as it developed, our review is not." Its aggressive defense of the separation of powers and the constitutional right of the Courts to judge the legality of laws (citing, amongst others, the decisive case of Marbury v. Madison that "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is") bears implications for other immediate grave cases of Constitutional violations by President Obama. 

Just two weeks from now, on Feb. 7th, a federal court in that same court circuit is scheduled to hear the Department of Justice's motion to dismiss the House of Representatives case against Attorney General Eric Holder's stonewalling of Congressional supoenas on "Fast and Furious."

The decision likewise bears upon the President's violations of the War Powers Act, and Sen. John Kerry's defense of that violation.

The specific case addressed was an appeal of a decision taken by the National Labor Relations Board (NRLB), filed on the grounds that the NLRB decision was illegal because three of its required five members had been appointed as alleged "recess appointments" by President Obama on Jan. 4, 2012, when the Senate had declared itself in pro forma session, thus subverting Constitutional requirements for Senate advice and consent on such appointments. Obama asserted that he could determine when the Senate was in session or not, and made the appointments.

The Court ruled the NLRB decision void, on the grounds that Obama making appointments when the Senate was in session violates the Constitution's Recess Appointment Clause. The decision centers on addressing the latter issue. It is clearly written, moreover, to uphold the Constitutional principle of the separation of powers as a whole, not merely in the case of recess appointments, delivering an implicit broadside against the recent assertions of the alleged powers of a so-called Unitary Executive. As the decision argues: "The Constitution's separation of powers features, of which the Appointments Clause is one, do not simply protect one branch from another. These structural provisions serve to protect the people, for it is ultimately the people's rights that suffer when one branch encroaches on another" [emphasis in original].

The Court cites a memorandum issued by the Office of Legal Council, which asserts that "the President therefore has discretion to conclude that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advise-and-consent function and to exercise his power to make recess appointments."

To which the Court replies:

"This will not do. Allowing the President to define the scope of his own appointments power would eviscerate the Constitution's separation of powers. The checks and balances that the Constitution placed on each branch of government serve as `self-executing safeguard[s] against the encroachment or aggrandizement of one branch at the expense of the other.' [citing a 1976 court decision]. An interpretation of `the Recess' that permits the President to decide when the Senate is in recess would demolish the checks and balances inherent in the advice-and-consent requirement, giving the President free rein to appoint his desired nominees at any time he pleases, whether that time be a weekend, lunch or even when the Senate is in session and he is merely displeased with its inaction. This cannot be the law."

And again: "The dearth of intrasession appointments in the years and decades following the ratification of the Constitution speaks far more impressively than the history of recent presidential exercise of a supposed power to make such appointments... Recent presidents are doing no more than interpreting the Constitution. While we recognize that all branches of government must of necessity exercise their understanding of the Constitution in order to perform their duties faithfully thereto, ultimately it is our role to discern the authoritative meaning of the supreme law."

Carl Schmitt-styled arguments asserted by the Obama White House, that it can violate the Constitution on grounds that "administrative efficiency" requires it to do so, are rejected out of hand. The court dismissed the NLRB's argument that the Court must uphold Obama's appointments, in order to avoid the "dire consequences" which could result from its overturning of his appointments, leaving "the President unable to fulfill his chief constitutional obligation to `take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed'."

The Court ruled: "We cannot accept an interpretation of the Constitution completely divorced from its original meaning in order to resolve exigencies created by -- and equally remediable by -- the executive and legislative branches. In any event, if some administrative inefficiency results from our construction of the original meaning of the Constitution, that does not empower us to change what the Constitution commands. As the Supreme Court observed in INS v. Chadha, `the fact that a given law or procedure is efficient, convenient, and useful in facilitating functions of government, standing alone, will not save it if it is contrary to the Constitution.' 4562 U.S. at 994. It bears emphasis that `[c] convenience and efficiency are not the primary objectives or the hallmarks of democratic government. Idim."

The decision by the Washington, D.C. appeals court against Obama on January 25 has implications far beyond what most media coverage has mentioned.

COULD BE A GOOD BYE NOTE FOR OBEWAN...THERE MAY BE A MESSAGE FROM HIM AROUND NOON ON TV...

The decision by the Washington, D.C. appeals court against Obama on January 25 has implications far beyond what most media coverage has mentioned.  Below are the remarks of Lyndon LaRouche at his webcast that day, followed by the LaRouche  PAC report on the decision.

    LYNDON LAROUCHE: Well, there was some very interesting news
that was given to me today, earlier, and that is that I never
have seen in my life such a parade of implicit indictments of a
President of the United States as was reported to me today. I'm
not going to comment on the details of this report, but I simply
say that it comes as a blessed sign from Heaven or something like
that, and it should be greeted as such. It's obvious, what is
obvious, without going into the details which were better stated
by relevant legal and judicial authorities than by me, but I can
say that what I've heard today -- and I do understand what I've
heard -- that this is probably the greatest indictment of an
incumbent President of the United States that I've ever heard. If
there's one that occurred [more] ominous than this one, I don't
know what it was. And I think I know the history of the United
States pretty well. But that comes not as a finality of anything,
because this situation is subject to all kinds of reversals back
and forth, but the fact that such a counter to the President's
behavior has been stated publicly by a Federal court, is in
itself a very important development, even without trying to
interpret what has been said. But the implications of it, as any
plain language review of it would say, is this man has been
slapped down back and forward repeatedly through the whole
reading of these charges. And that does mean there is a
qualitative shift in the political situation inside the United
States, which the reading of these charges, conclusions I
presume, have been delivered. I don't think any President could
withstand what has been read against him with such precision, in
the history of the United States. Some people may have hated
someone more than they hated this fellow, but they certainly have
placed the charges, and I don't think that without the equivalent
of some kind of coup d'etat in support of the President, that he
can withstand this. If these charges are presented and they're
concluded and if the consequences follow, this man is probably on
the way out of office, barely since the time he was re-installed
in it. So that's probably a double whammy in this case.
        What this does show, with conclusion, which I can speak to
on that account, is that after these charges have been placed and
reported by the Federal court, that this President is in deep
trouble. And that much is clear. Now what it means for the rest
of us is, that the situation was so bad, in terms of the
Congress, that the Congress should have delivered precisely these
kinds of charges beforehand. And undoubtedly, there were people
inside the Congress, particularly the Senate, who would have
proceeded on these charges if encouraged to do so. And I think
that has to be considered a factor; that all the ideas that
somehow Obama has come off clean on the basis of his
re-installation as President, that that is in doubt now. I don't
believe that any President, unless he has the powers to conduct a
coup d'etat, could remain in office under the continuation of the
list of charges which have been presented as conclusions by the
Federal court.

Court of Appeals Strikes Down Obama's Violation of Constitutional Separation of Powers

January 26th, 2013 • 12:11 PM

The U.S. Court of Appeals for the District of Columbia Circuit issued a 47-page ruling today, Jan. 25, 2013, upholding the U.S. Constitution against Executive branch violation of the Constitutional separation of powers, in its ruling that President Obama violated the Constitution in making recess appointments when the Senate was, indeed, in session.

The import of the decision extends far beyond the specific case which engendered that decision, as the Court recognized when it stated from the outset, that "while the posture of the petition is routine, as it developed, our review is not." Its aggressive defense of the separation of powers and the constitutional right of the Courts to judge the legality of laws (citing, amongst others, the decisive case of Marbury v. Madison that "it is emphatically the province and duty of the judicial department to say what the law is") bears implications for other immediate, grave cases of Constitutional violations by President Obama. Just two weeks from now, on Feb. 7th, a federal court in that same court circuit is scheduled to hear the Department of Justice's motion to dismiss the House of Representatives case against Attorney General Eric Holder's stonewalling of Congressional supoenas on "Fast and Furious."

The decision likewise bears upon the President's violations of the War Powers Act, and Sen. John Kerry's defense of that violation.

The specific case addressed was an appeal of a decision taken by the National Labor Relations Board (NRLB), filed on the grounds that the NLRB decision was illegal because three of its required five members had been appointed as alleged "recess appointments" by President Obama on Jan. 4, 2012, when the Senate had declared itself in pro forma session, thus subverting Constitutional requirements for Senate advice and consent on such appointments. Obama asserted that he could determine when the Senate was in session or not, and made the appointments.

The Court ruled the NLRB decision void, on the grounds that Obama making appointments when the Senate was in session violates the Constitution's Recess Appointment Clause. The decision centers on addressing the latter issue. It is clearly written, moreover, to uphold the Constitutional principle of the separation of powers as a whole, not merely in the case of recess appointments, delivering an implicit broadside against the recent assertions of the alleged powers of a so-called Unitary Executive. As the decision argues: "The Constitution's separation of powers features, of which the Appointments Clause is one, do not simply protect one branch from another. These structural provisions serve to protect the people, for it is ultimately the people's rights that suffer when one branch encroaches on another" [emphasis in original].

The Court cites a memorandum issued by the Office of Legal Council, which asserts that "the President therefore has discretion to conclude that the Senate is unavailable to perform its advise-and-consent function and to exercise his power to make recess appointments."

To which the Court replies:

"This will not do. Allowing the President to define the scope of his own appointments power would eviscerate the Constitution's separation of powers. The checks and balances that the Constitution placed on each branch of government serve as `self-executing safeguard[s] against the encroachment or aggrandizement of one branch at the expense of the other.' [citing a 1976 court decision]. An interpretation of `the Recess' that permits the President to decide when the Senate is in recess would demolish the checks and balances inherent in the advice-and-consent requirement, giving the President free rein to appoint his desired nominees at any time he pleases, whether that time be a weekend, lunch or even when the Senate is in session and he is merely displeased with its inaction. This cannot be the law."

And again: "The dearth of intrasession appointments in the years and decades following the ratification of the Constitution speaks far more impressively than the history of recent presidential exercise of a supposed power to make such appointments... Recent presidents are doing no more than interpreting the Constitution. While we recognize that all branches of government must of necessity exercise their understanding of the Constitution in order to perform their duties faithfully thereto, ultimately it is our role to discern the authoritative meaning of the supreme law."

Carl Schmitt-styled arguments asserted by the Obama White House, that it can violate the Constitution on grounds that "administrative efficiency" requires it to do so, are rejected out of hand. The court dismissed the NLRB's argument that the Court must uphold Obama's appointments, in order to avoid the "dire consequences" which could result from its overturning of his appointments, leaving "the President unable to fulfill his chief constitutional obligation to `take Care that the Laws be faithfully executed'."

The Court ruled: "We cannot accept an interpretation of the Constitution completely divorced from its original meaning in order to resolve exigencies created by -- and equally remediable by -- the executive and legislative branches. In any event, if some administrative inefficiency results from our construction of the original meaning of the Constitution, that does not empower us to change what the Constitution commands. As the Supreme Court observed in INS v. Chadha, `the fact that a given law or procedure is efficient, convenient, and useful in facilitating functions of government, standing alone, will not save it if it is contrary to the Constitution.' 4562 U.S. at 994. It bears emphasis that `[c]onvenience and efficiency are not the primary objectives or the hallmarks of democratic government. Idim."

Davos: World Leaders Have Reached The Conclusion That Humanity Are Facing a Paradigm Shift

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Davos: World Leaders Have Reached The Conclusion That Humanity Are Facing a Paradigm Shift

Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 29-Jan-2013 08:41:06

. Newsletter from Susan Joy Rennison.. Joyfire Newsletter – 28th January 2013 www.susanrennison.com Space Weather & The X Factors Hello Joyfire Supporter! This is an important newsletter that provides details and analysis of the incredible news coming from the World Economic Forum that humanity is facing a paradigm shift. Download the .pdf files to get the newsletter with images. Enjoy! ~~~~~~~~~ “Through basic education and awareness campaigns, the general public can achieve a higher science and space literacy and cognitive resilience that would prepare them and prevent undesired social consequences of such a profound discovery [extraterrestrial life] and paradigm shift concerning humankind’s position in the universe.” Global Risks: Davos 2013 - X Factors World Economic Forum: Reports 2013 http://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2013/section-five/x-factors/ There is some very important news from The World Economic Forum that took place 23 – 27 January 2013, in Davos, Switzerland. It seems that world leaders have reached the conclusion that humanity are facing a paradigm shift. That is major news! From the Executive Summary of the Global Risks Special Report, we are presented with the notion that leaders must ensure that countries prepare for global risks that are seemingly beyond its control or influence. Developed in partnership with the editors of Nature, a leading science journal, “X Factors” are presented that look beyond the landscape of the usual set of 50 global risks to alert decision-makers to five emerging game-changers. These are presented as: • Runaway climate change: Is it possible that we have already passed a point of no return and that Earth’s atmosphere is tipping rapidly into an inhospitable state? • Significant cognitive enhancement: Ethical dilemmas akin to doping in sports could start to extend into daily working life; an arms race in the neural “enhancement” of combat troops could also ensue. • Rogue deployment of geoengineering: Technology is now being developed to manipulate the climate; a state or private individual could use it unilaterally. • Costs of living longer: Medical advances are prolonging life, but long-term palliative care is expensive. Covering the costs associated with old age could be a struggle. • Discovery of alien life: Proof of life elsewhere in the universe could have profound psychological implications for human belief systems. Source: Executive Summary: Global Risks 2013, X Factors, Davos 2013 http://reports.weforum.org/global-risks-2013/section-one/executive-summary/ On examination, most of these X Factors are related one way or another to Space Weather and rapid evolutionary change. In this regard, we must realise that there are increasing numbers of people with synaesthesia who should be considered as the new human mutants as they have “significant cognitive enhancement”. Yet, this Davos 2013 report makes it very clear that the general public needs to be re-educated by the promotion of science and “space literacy” campaigns. Since press releases from various space agencies in recent years are making it very clear that the issue of Space Weather is becoming very serious what else could “space literacy” represent besides Space Weather? Furthermore, amongst business leaders, politicians and central bankers, it was reported that a representative from the Vatican, the archbishop of Dublin, Diarmuid Martin (who has attended more Davos meetings than any other Irishman since his days in the Vatican) was in attendance. He was asked to provide a talk on ‘X factors; Preparing For The Unknown’. It must be understood that the Vatican are in a unique position as they have vast archives of ancient manuscripts and a tradition of understanding the existence of long astronomical cycles that affect life on Earth. In medieval times, priests were picked from scholars who had studied astronomy before they were allowed to become theologians or philosophers. Today, it is clear that the astronomical tradition has been maintained with state-of-the-art astronomical observatories and a strong working relationship with the National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA). In recent years, the Vatican have been sponsoring astrobiology conferences showing that it is willing to officially sanction public discussions on the existence of extraterrestrial life. More significantly, it showed that the Vatican was willing to initiate a comprehensive dialogue on the theological implications of the discovery of intelligent extraterrestrial life. As it has been reported: “The Vatican’s astrobiology conference is yet one more sign that major global institutions are preparing for some kind of formal disclosure concerning UFOs and/or extraterrestrial life. This is a direct outcome of a series of landmark meetings at the UN beginning in February 2008 that led to the adoption of a new openness policy.” Source: Vatican prepares for extraterrestrial disclosurehttp://www.examiner.com/article/vatican-prepares-for-extraterrestrial-disclosure Section 5 of the Davos 2013 Global Risks Special Report, titled: ‘X Factors: Discovery of Alien Life’, makes it clear that there is a need to prepare the public for the existence of alien lifeforms. Specifically the document states: “Over the long term, the psychological and philosophical implications of the discovery could be profound. If life forms (even fossilized life forms) are found in our solar system, for example, the origin of life is “easy” – that any place in the universe life can emerge, it will emerge. It will suggest that life is as natural and as ubiquitous a part of the universe as the stars and galaxies. The discovery of even simple life would fuel speculation about the existence of other intelligent beings and challenge many assumptions that underpin human philosophy and religion.” In this regard, Vatican astronomers have some very strong views. They accept the existence of extraterrestrials and Shadow Life. In a very interesting interview given by Adriano Forgione, Editor-In-Chief of two Italian UFO Magazines, ‘Dossier Alieni’ and ‘UFO Network’ with Vatican Priest Corrado Balducci, in 1999 we are told: “I must start by saying that angels do not use spaceships. As purely spiritual beings, they are where they want to be and if they wanted to show themselves, they wouldn’t have any trouble taking on visible forms. So, when we talk about extraterrestrials, we have to think either of beings like us or, preferably, other types of beings who always combine a spiritual part with a material part, a body, even though they have a different relationship compared with us terrestrial humans. Nowadays, science accepts the existence of forms of life in the cosmos, even though it doesn’t want to take into account the fact that these intelligences could already be here in our planetary sphere, at least in an obvious form.” Source: Many saints believed in extraterrestrial life: Vatican Monsignor http://www.ufodigest.com/vaticanufos.html Due to the research made public by scientists in various countries that include Norway, Australia and Italy, it is known that Shadow Life or a Shadow Biosphere made up of plasma entities does exist on this planet and insights from important research can be downloaded for free by anyone prepared to look. SETV (Search for Extraterrestrial Visitation) have identified 35 “hotspots” over the globe and there have been aspirations to set up “open air laboratories” in 30 locations. The official thinking has been that ET probes could be hiding inside plasma orbs and that is a good enough excuse for funding. Now, the problem is that since scientists have been monitoring, the energetic shift on this planet has meant instead of isolated and remote areas, which have been known to host “light phenomena” for hundreds if not thousands of years, the “hotspots” are spreading all over the planet! Hence the need for awareness campaigns to educate the public. Read the entire pdf here: http://www.susanrennison.com/Joyfire_Space_Weather_Jan2013.pdf

From the border

PLEASE WATCH

Border Security - do not shy away from this video please.

Powerful Video you should see produced by the NRA (National Rifle Association), but you need to be aware of this as a citizen of the U.S.A.

For those of you who may not know, Sheriff Larry Dever, white cowboy hat and blue/white checkered shirt is the long time sheriff of Cochise County . Sierra Vista , is the largest town in Cochise County . Cochise County is huge and borders Sonora, Mexico . The bald-headed guy is the Sheriff of Pima County . Tucson, AZ, is in Pima County .

This video doesn't say so, but I've seen videos taken on Hwy 8, going from I-10 north of Tucson, thru Gila Bed and on to CA has a sign warning drivers not to stop or pick up hitchhikers because so many are illegals who have illegally come across the border from Mexico. They can be Mexican or of any other foreign country.

Powerful!! And absolutely factual!

http://videos.allinnra.com/share

ABSOLUTE PROOF - I NAILED THE ORGANIZATION RESPONSIBLE FOR CONTROLLING THE TRUTH MOVEMENT

They are V4BL.ORG AND THEIR ASSOCIATED WEB SITES AND SERVERS

PERMALINK

Because they are a clandestine scam organization, probably run by the Israeli government or some other scam center in the U.S., when you click the link today, after I said I was going to nark on them, it just says "nothing to see here". But they don't own the WAYBACK MACHINE so I was able to tear them out of a new pair of undies. And if they want to scam their way out of pulling that little trick, I photographed the entire computer at this cyber cafe, with that reality on the screen. Yesterday there were links to their companion servers, which censor web sites and hunt the web for topic related subjects to make them vanish as desired. I got those documented but forgot to bring that to this cyber cafe, so I will post that tomorrow.

And surprisingly, on the updated page I saw yesterday, they are blocking upwards of 500 million web sites and e-mail addresses under the guise of them being spoof e-mails and web sites, so the list is growing QUICKLY, - up by over 100 million in only a month. Anyone should realize that my web site is no spoof, and therefore this organization exists FOR ONE REASON ONLY - TO SILENCE THE REAL TRUTH MOVEMENT WHILE HACKS SPIKE IT INTO THE GROUND LIKE A TOUCHDOWN FOOTBALL.

Many of you have noticed that the truth movement has been going downhill in the last little while, and HERE IS WHY. This organization has not been around long, as evidenced by the December 6th 2012 page in the wayback machine, which reads:

See our historical results/progress here. Oldest IP: 1185 days listed. Over the last 30 days: V4BL/DDNSBL blocklist has been updated by one IP every 0.049 seconds. Over the past year the list has grown by 309,536,835 IPs. At any given moment, there are more than 25M new IPs queued awaiting basic compliancy checks."

Basic "Compliancy checks"? You mean, if you do not COMPLY WITH THE ZIONIST AGENDA YOU GO IN THE TRASH????? There you have it. No wonder why I have been blown away and unable to communicate. I wonder how much has really been blocked? What should the truth movement REALLY look like? No wonder why much of the great insightful stuff appears to be vanishing, while being replaced with kooky bullshit.
I have had several people offer me over $50,000 to keep this web site running and not have me living poorly. From different people. NOT SPAM, and they all just magically vanished. I wonder why.
I am certain that the only reason why this site is visible is because I told everyone to mirror it. AND DO THAT, PLEASE, INCLUDING THE NEWS RELATED PICTURES, DONT JUST LINK TO THEM, GET THEM OUT OF HERE.
V4BL, a hostile .ORG has GOT TO run on (at least) a 40,000 core super computer or cloud computer, because it funnels the entire web through it, a fact made reality by what it is - a total internet filter. It gets All e-mails, all communications, and they decide what lives and dies. This was outlined clearly on their web site yesterday, and now it just says "nothing to see here" because most likely they watch this web site, and knew this would be today's report which I announced would be coming yesterday. Needless to say the only front end they REALLY need is "nothing to see here" because they are a hostile organization that until now, until they screwed with me, flew under the radar.
http://www.jimstonefreelance.com/

Genetically Modified Humans? New Gene-Altering Drug Paves Way for Mass Modification

Genetically Modified Humans? New Gene-Altering Drug Paves Way for Mass Modification

Posted By: CrystalRiver
Date: Monday, 28-Jan-2013 09:08:51

Genetically Modified Humans? New Gene-Altering Drug Paves Way for Mass Modification We’ve seen genetically modified mosquitoes, genetically modified plants, and genetically modified cows, but could we soon be dealing with our own genetic alterations – genetically modified humans? As the months and years pass, scientists seem to be getting closer to ‘manufacturing’ humankind, with some of the most recent ‘advancements’ revolving around a new approved drug therapy that is designed to ‘correct genetic errors’. More at this link: http://worldtruth.tv/genetically-modified-humans-new-gene-altering-drug-paves-way-for-mass-modification/ ------------------------------------ Dear RM Agents and Readers, It sounds good, it always 'sounds' good, but is it? Anything that can be given to make one stronger and smarter can also make one weaker and turn one into a dim bulb so to speak. Many Blessings, CrystalRiver http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=267760

U.S. Military Spy Drone that's so Powerful it can see What Type of Phone you're Carrying from 17,500ft vid showing how

U.S. Military Spy Drone that's so Powerful it can see What Type of Phone you're Carrying from 17,500ft vid showing how

Posted By: Susoni [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 28-Jan-2013 16:31:31

And it can see how many warm bodies are in a house, etc... Could this be the real reason lead paint was removed from paint?? So they could see through our walls?? I'm amazed they didn't name it the "All Seeing eye of RA." **************************************** The incredible U.S. military spy drone that's so powerful it can see what type of phone you're carrying from 17,500ft The ARGUS-IS can view an area of 15 sq/miles in a single image Its zoom capability can detect an object as small as 6in on the ground Developed by BAE as part of a $18million DARPA project System works by stringing together 368 digital camera chips By DAMIEN GAYLE A sinister airborne surveillance camera gives the U.S. military the ability to track movements in an entire city like a real-time Google Street View. The ARGUS-IS array can be mounted on unmanned drones to capture an area of 15 sq/miles in an incredible 1,800MP - that's 225 times more sensitive than an iPhone camera. From 17,500ft the remarkable surveillance system can capture objects as small as 6in on the ground and allows commanders to track movements across an entire battlefield in real time. Beat that, Google: An image taken from 17,500ft by the U.S. military's ARGUS-IS array, which can capture 1,800MP zoomable video feeds of an entire medium-sized city in real time Beat that, Google: An image taken from 17,500ft by the U.S. military's ARGUS-IS array, which can capture 1,800MP zoomable video feeds of an entire medium-sized city in real time Go to link to see photos: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2269563/The-U-S-militarys-real-time-Google-Street-View-Airborne-spy-camera-track-entire-city-1-800MP.html#ixzz2JIemLQkS 'It is important for the public to know that some of these capabilities exist,' said Yiannis Antoniades, the BAE engineer who designed the system, in a recent PBS broadcast. The aerospace and weapons company developed the ARGUS-IS array as part of a $18.5million project funded by the Pentagon's Defense Advanced Research Projects Agency (Darpa). More... http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2269563/The-U-S-militarys-real-time-Google-Street-View-Airborne-spy-camera-track-entire-city-1-800MP.html#ixzz2JIemLQkS A Burj eye view of Dubai: Heart-stopping 360-degree interactive image taken from top of the world's tallest building Marking your cards: The DNA gun that can invisibly tag criminals for weeks after a riot Set for take-off: Britain's deadly superdrone that picks its own targets but experts warn plane could mark the start of 'robot wars' http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2269563/The-U-S-militarys-real-time-Google-Street-View-Airborne-spy-camera-track-entire-city-1-800MP.html#ixzz2JIemLQkS In Greek mythology, Argus Panoptes, guardian of the heifer-nymph Io and son of Arestor, was a primordial giant whose epithet, 'Panoptes', 'all-seeing', led to his being described with multiple, often one hundred, eyes. Like the Titan of myth, the Pentagon's ARGUS-IS (a backronym standing for Autonomous Real-time Ground Ubiquitous Surveillance-Imaging System) works by stringing together an array of 368 digital camera imaging chips. An airborne processor combines the video from these chips to create a single ultra-high definition mosaic video image which updates at up to 15 frames a second. All-seeing: This graphic illustrates how the U.S. military's ARGUS-IS array links together images streamed from hundreds of digital camera sensors to watch over a huge expanse of terrain in real time All-seeing: This graphic illustrates how the U.S. military's ARGUS-IS array links together images streamed from hundreds of digital camera sensors to watch over a huge expanse of terrain in real time http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2269563/The-U-S-militarys-real-time-Google-Street-View-Airborne-spy-camera-track-entire-city-1-800MP.html#ixzz2JIemLQkS What it looks like: The ARGUS-IS (a backronym standing for Autonomous Real-time Ground Ubiquitous Surveillance-Imaging System) strings together an array of 368 digital camera imaging chips into a single unit What it looks like: The ARGUS-IS (a backronym standing for Autonomous Real-time Ground Ubiquitous Surveillance-Imaging System) strings together an array of 368 digital camera imaging chips into a single unit That tremendous level of detail makes it sensitive enough to not only track people moving around on the ground thousands of feet below, but even to see what they are doing or carrying. The ARGUS array sends its live feed to the ground where it connects to a touch-screen command room interface. Using this, operators can zoom in to any area within the camera's field of view, with up to 65 zoom windows open at once. Each video window is electronically steerable independent of the others, and can either provide continuous imagery of a fixed area on the ground or be designated to automatically keep a specified target in the window. Sinister: The system tracks all moving objects in its field of view, highlighting them with coloured boxes, allowing operators to track movements across an area as and when they happen Sinister: The system tracks all moving objects in its field of view, highlighting them with coloured boxes, allowing operators to track movements across an area as and when they happen The system automatically tracks any moving object it can see, including both vehicles and individuals on foot, highlighting them with coloured boxes so they can be easily identified. It also records everything, storing an approximate million terabytes of data a day - the equivalent of 5,000 hours of high-definition video footage. 'So you can go back and say I'd like to see what happened at this particular location three days, two hours [and] four minutes ago, and it will actually show you what happened as if you were watching it live,' said Mr Antoniades. iPad next? The feed from the ARGUS is transmitted to a touch-screen command and control interface iPad next? The feed from the ARGUS is transmitted to a touch-screen command and control interface Windows: Operators can open a window to zoom in to any area within the camera's field of view, with up to 65 open and running at once Windows: Operators can open a window to zoom in to any area within the camera's field of view, with up to 65 open and running at once Total surveillance: The view of Quantico, Virginia, highlighted in the PBS film Total surveillance: The view of Quantico, Virginia, highlighted in the PBS film For the PBS programme reporting the technology, Mr Antoniades showed reporters a feed over the city of Quantico, Virginia, that was recorded in 2009. The technology has been in development since 2007 but authorities are staying tight lipped about whether it has yet been deployed on the battlefield. Dr Steven Wein, director of optical sensor systems at BAE Systems, said: 'The ARGUS-IS system overcomes the fundamental limitations of current airborne surveillance systems. 'Very high-resolution imaging systems required for vehicle and dismount tracking typically have a "soda-straw" view that is too small for persistent coverage. 'Existing wide-area systems have either inadequate resolution or require multiple passes or revisits to get updates.' BAE are now said to be working on an infra-red version of ARGUS that would allow commanders total surveillance of an area even at night. Read more: http://www.dailymail.co.uk/sciencetech/article-2269563/The-U-S-militarys-real-time-Google-Street-View-Airborne-spy-camera-track-entire-city-1-800MP.html#ixzz2JIemLQkS Follow us: @MailOnline on Twitter | DailyMail on Facebook http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=267798

Stomach Problems and GMO Food - dr.. Tent

Stomach Problems and GMO Food - dr.. Tent

Posted By: NotRob
Date: Monday, 28-Jan-2013 19:45:55

In Response To: Thank You NotRob---I'll Be Listening For Sure (CrystalRiver)

Thank you CyrstalRiver. You may also like this one. Dr. Tent ,Touches on chem spraying. It is also 2hrs long but very informative. http://m.youtube.com/#/watch?v=Esk7k5KkhXE http://m.youtube.com/user/DiverseHealthService Crystal river could you contact me. I would like to ask you some questions on Morgellons and some of the treatments for it. I will leave you my email in the lounge. Thank you. NotRob.