"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 26

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 26
by Sherman H. Skolnick 2/22/03

DISASTERS OF CONVENIENCE
[1] On January 16, 2003, Space Shuttle "Columbia" lifted off into space. On that same day, the residence of Federal Reserve Commissar Alan Greenspan was burglarized. As described by the Associated Press story, 1/22/2003, the maid had gone shopping. The residence had apparently been "cased" by the burglars for some time. According to AP, the thieves were looking for the jewelry of Greenspan's wife, Andrea Mitchell.[
[What they were really looking for is described in Part 25 of this series.]
[2] On February 1, 2003, Space shuttle "Columbia" exploded. Early reports, however, denied that it had exploded. On that afternoon, on network television, a person described as Andrea Mitchell told how the explosion of Space Shuttle "Challenger" on Janu ary 28, 1986, was a convenient disaster as to the then President Ronald Reagan. At the time, Reagan was being heckled with charges that he was implicated in the Iran-Contra situation. That funds secretly given to the Iranians were skimmed off to finance the counter-revolutionaries in Nicaragua, to evade the Boland Amendment, prohibiting the U.S. from financing the Contras as they were called.
At the time Daddy Bush, as Vice President, denied he knew anything about this. He said he was "out of the loop" and thus not told what was going on. Later facts brought out by the Independent Counsel showed otherwise. In later years, some Congressmen an d other insiders admitted that they thought about impeaching President Reagan but thought it would be a bad thing for the nation. Working on a report on the Iran-Contra mess was a commission headed by Senator John Tower (R. Texas). For short, it was cal led the Tower Commission. In 1991, when he was unfairly defamed in being rejected by the Daddy Bush Administration for Secretary of Defense, Tower began grumbling he was going to bring out some dirty secrets of the elder Bush then President. Convenient ly, Tower perished with his daughter in an apparent sabotaged plane crash in April, 1991. About the same time, Senator John Heinz (R., Penn.), heir to the Heinz Ketchup fortune was himself snuffed out when his airplane was hit fro! m below by a helicopter. Although some believed it was foul play, others contended the helicopter pilot, examining whether the Heinz plane could not lower the landing wheels, slammed into the plane. Others raised the sinister version that the whirlybir d pilot wanted somehow to commit "suicide". Heinz' widow married Senator John Kerry (D., Mass.), long connected to the American CIA. Senator Kerry in investigating the dope traffic through his subcommittee, conveniently covered up the role of the espion age agency money laundry, Bank of Credit and Commerce International, BCCI, that also financed the campaigns of a group of senators including Kerry.
[3] Those close to Greenspan, were in a position to know that he was getting tired of being ordered to do certain acts to unlawfully, in violation of Anti-Trust laws, force down the price of gold, among other things he was compelled by the aristocracy t o do after being installed by them as head of their PRIVATE central bank. The "black bag" job on Greenspan's residence was the last straw. Despite negative acts Andrea Mitchell may have done prior to 2/1/2003, she did a brave and patriotic act, good for common Americans, to implicitly draw an analogy. That is, the Space Shuttle Columbia explosion was a Disaster of Convenience, just like that of "Challenger". It served to divert attention, for a period from the growing anti-war sentiment as to George W . Bush's plan to invade Iraq to remove his father's private business partner, from the 1980s, Saddam Hussein. Saddam and Daddy Bush shared billions of dollars from extortion practiced on the oil-rich weak sheikdoms of the Persian ! Gulf. The secret partnership was the subject in 1990-91, of an unpublicized federal lawsuit in Chicago. I was the only journalist at the court hearing and in the back of the courtroom interviewed the participants. [Details in our website story, "The Sec rets of Timothy McVeigh".] Like other once partnerships, these partners had a falling out.
As to how the Daddy Bush Whitehouse supplied the beginnings of Iraq's nuclear quest and that of bio-chemical weapons, see the heavily documented book "The Spider's Web" by Alan Friedman, investigative journalist for the Financial Times of London. How di d Daddy Bush escape impeachment?
[4] On September 11, 2001, for some time after being informed one and then another plane slammed into the twin towers in lower Manhattan, George W. Bush, the occupant and resident of the White House, described by some as a usurper of presidential powers , he continued to joke with school children about stories about goats. On Black Tuesday, Bush. He did not by phone, radio, or otherwise, immediately communicate with his Generals and Admirals. There was a strange stand-down of the military, described by some as part of a foreknowledge, deliberate plan.
On February 1, 2003, on the other hand, White House occupant Bush immediately was brought from Camp David to the White House where he began giving orders what was to be done.
[5] Astute commentators and investigators, such as Michael Ruppert, have raised the question that there was prior knowledge at the highest level of 9-11. The purpose, as described by Ruppert, and others, was to sidestep and head off, by the Black Tuesd ay disaster, the expected and impending financial meltdown of the United States.
By the disaster of convenience, the explosion of "Challenger", the Reagan/Elder Bush White House evaded the consequences of their treasonous acts and doings in the Iran-Contra Affair leading back to the treachery of the "October Surprise", where incumbe nt Jimmy Carter was shown to be a wimp because he could not get the release of the 52 U.S. hostages held by the Iranians. Daddy Bush, in a Paris suburb, secretly taped by the French CIA, paid off the Iranians to keep the hostages until the Reagan/Bush t icket won the election and were inaugurated. The hostages were released at the very moment Reagan was sworn in as the new President, January, 1981. By multiple gunmen shooting at him, however, a few weeks later, Reagan was warned he has to follow ORDERS . The failed assassination taught Reagan a lesson.
[6] A flood of misleading and contradictory reports by the oil-soaked, spy-riddled monopoly press covered up any possible foul play in the disaster in 1986 of "Challenger". No official U.S. investigation was made of the high-tech Soviet ship located rig ht near where "Challenger" lifted off and then very shortly thereafter exploded and the capsule fell into the ocean. The explosion was explained away, conveniently, by a possible failing of a retaining ring in the Space Shuttle, referred to as an "O rin g". Naturally, the public beat on the brain repeatedly with that explanation, more or less accepted that. That was before widespread talk radio, before Internet, before more alternate ews reports now available.
[7] As to the explosion of "Columbia" Space Shuttle, Americans will no doubt be beat on the head again by the pressfakers. That some tiles came loose causing the disaster.
As to a split in the Aristocracy that would explain several strange events, the "Liars and Whores of the Press", as we see fit to call them, will not point to various happenings as possibly part of the same scenario. Black Tuesday and the growing unders tanding by careful investigators that there was prior knowledge. Such as counter-terror expert, FBI top official John P. O'Neill, who resigned just prior to 9-11, because the Bush White House ordered him to stop investigating Osama bin Laden. Why? Becau se of the Bush Crime Family being in partnership with the bin Laden Family that has NOT been on the outs with Osama. O'Neill became the new security chief of the World Trade Center, and although originally safe outside the buildings, was somehow lured i nside to his death. [Visit earlier parts of this series for related details.]
Such as top officials of both the current Bush Administration being criminally implicated with the downfall of Enron, WorldCom, and Arthur Andersen. Such as top officials of both the Republic National Committee and the Democrat National Committee being likewise criminally implicated.
Such as George W. Bush being blackmailed by the Red Chinese Secret Police to get U.S. military secrets out of him. Why? Because they and others, otherwise, may publicize the no longer secret cavorting of Bush with his male sex-mate. It is not, as we car efully have descibed, a PRIVATE matter, but a matter of national security. [See prior parts of this series.] [8] Lawyers know how to split hairs to fudge on the truth. Bill Clinton's understanding of sex is when the male penetrates the female. Hence, Monica Lewinsky performing oral sex with him, was not, according to Clinton, "sex with that woman". In the "Col umbia" disaster, NASA said it was too early to know what happened. Despite that, a spokesman for the newly created Homeland Security, boldly stated that no ground-to-air missile brought down the Space Shuttle at 207,000 feet above Earth. What about a Wa ter-to-Air projectile? Conveniently left unsaid was any discussion of Star Wars, laser or particle beams possibly aimed at the Space Shuttle from satellite. Some reports contend a satellite mysteriously changed course just before the explosion of "Colum bia".
And what about HAARP, the super-beam technology particularly good at putting many million watt scorching particularly at the level above earth that the "Columbia" was reportedly at when it exploded. The U.S. Military has bragged that they are always te n years ahead in technology where the ordinary people think the military is at. Savvy sorts contend particle beam technology is old hat. That there is a so far publicly un-named technology that can through electromagnetic or other pulsing, bring down ai rplanes (such as that of Wellstone where a witness said there was a strange flash near the plane's tail just as it dived into a crash).
[9] When there is a political assassination, the monopoly press NEVER raises the obvious question WHO BENEFITS. If there is a disaster, and possible foul play is not ruled out, WHO BENEFITS.
Research note In Part 25 of this series, I left out the fact that most all the details contained in that Part 25 story, were in a highly detailed petition, prepared by me, and submitted to the Federal Communications Commission, shortly after 1992. We a sked that Channel 38 TV have its broadcast license revoked for having assisted in the coverup of Hillary Rodham Clinton and her business partners, including Diane Lewis, who was in September, 1992, arrested, of sending missile parts to known worldwide t errorists. And that the higher ups at Channel 38 aided and abetted these offenses in violation of federal criminal provisions as to exports. Highly political under the Clinton Administration, and long known as corrupt, the FCC refused us a hearing on ou r highly detailed petition asking for Channel 38 TV Chicago to be appropriately punished as a licensed tv broadcaster.
More coming....Stay tuned.

The Muslim way explained. A MUST READ

Date: Thu, 30 May 2013 02:37:54 -0700
 

Please circulate It was the fanatics that beheaded the British soldier in Northern England near the military base "TODAY 5/22/13!" Subject: The Muslim way explained. A MUST READ How great is your passivity? I hope it is not great at all. This is a reminder of why we need to be bold. This is very interesting in light of the identification of two young Muslims as the perpetrators of the latest Boston Massacre. A German's View on Islam - it's well worth reading. This is by far the best explanation of the Muslim terrorist situation I have ever read. The author's references to past history are accurate and clear. It's not a lengthy read, it's easy to understand, and it's well worth the read. The author of this email is Dr. Emanuel Tanya, a well-known and well-respected psychiatrist. A man, whose family was German aristocracy prior to World War II, owned a number of large industries and estates. When he was asked how many German people were true Nazis, the answer he gave can guide our attitude toward fanaticism. 'Very few people were true Nazis,' he said, 'but many enjoyed the return of German pride, and many more were too busy to care. I was one of those who just thought the Nazis were a bunch of fools. So, the majority just sat back and let it all happen. Then, before we knew it, they owned us, and we had lost control, and the end of the world had come. My family lost everything. I ended up in a concentration camp and the Allies destroyed my factories.' We are told again and again by 'experts' and 'talking heads' that Islam is the religion of peace and that the vast majority of Muslims just want to live in peace. Although this unqualified assertion may be true, it is entirely irrelevant. It is meaningless fluff, meant to make us feel better, and meant to somehow diminish the spectre of fanatics rampaging across the globe in the name of Islam. The fact is that the fanatics rule Islam at this moment in history. It is the fanatics who march. It is the fanatics who wage any one of 50 shooting wars worldwide. It is the fanatics who systematically slaughter Christian or tribal groups throughout Africa and are gradually taking over the entire continent in an Islamic wave. It is the fanatics who bomb, behead, murder, or honor-kill. It is the fanatics who take over mosque after mosque. It is the fanatics who zealously spread the stoning and hanging of rape victims and homosexuals. It is the fanatics who teach their young to kill and to become suicide bombers. The hard, quantifiable fact is that the peaceful majority, the 'silent majority,' is cowed and extraneous. Communist Russia was comprised of Russians who just wanted to live in peace, yet the Russian Communists were responsible for the murder of about 20 million people. The peaceful majority were irrelevant. China's huge population was peaceful as well, but Chinese Communists managed to kill a staggering 70 million people. The average Japanese individual prior to World War II was not a warmongering sadist. Yet, Japan murdered and slaughtered its way across South East Asia in an orgy of killing that included the systematic murder of 12 million Chinese civilians; most killed by sword, shovel, and bayonet. And who can forget Rwanda, which collapsed into butchery. Could it not be said that the majority of Rwandans were 'peace loving'? History lessons are often incredibly simple and blunt, yet for all our powers of reason, we often miss the most basic and uncomplicated of points: Peace-loving Muslims have been made irrelevant by their silence. Peace-loving Muslims will become our enemy if they don't speak up, because like my friend from Germany, they will awaken one day and find that the fanatics own them, and the end of their world will have begun. Peace-loving Germans, Japanese, Chinese, Russians, Rwandans, Serbs, Afghans, Iraqis, Palestinians, Somalis, Nigerians, Algerians, and many others have died because the peaceful majority did not speak up until it was too late. Now Islamic prayers have been introduced into Toronto and other public schools in Ontario, and, yes, in Ottawa too while the Lord's Prayer was removed (due to being so offensive?) The Islamic way may be peaceful for the time being in our country until the fanatics move in. In Australia, and indeed in many countries around the world, many of the most commonly consumed food items have the Halal emblem on them. Just look at the back of some of the most popular chocolate bars, and at other food items in your local supermarket.  Food on aircraft has the Halal emblem, just to appease the privileged minority who are now rapidly expanding within the nation’s shores. In the U.K, the Muslim communities refuse to integrate and there are now dozens of “no-go” zones within major cities across the country that the police force dare not intrude upon. Sharia law prevails there, because the Muslim community in those areas refuses to acknowledge British law. As for us who watch it all unfold, we must pay attention to the only group that counts - the fanatics who threaten our way of life. Lastly, anyone who doubts that the issue is serious and just deletes this email without sending it on is contributing to the passiveness that allows the problems to expand.  So, extend yourself a bit and send this on and on and on! Let us hope that thousands, world-wide, read this and think about it, and they also continue to send it on - before it's too late.                           And we are silent...... (Please forward like maybe your country depends on you)

WND EXCLUSIVE

HISTORIAN: OBAMA HELPING RESURRECT OTTOMAN EMPIRE?

Pattern seen in 'Arab Spring' interventions began in Balkans in 1990s

Published: 9 hours ago

 JEROME R. CORSI About | Email | Archive

 Subscribe to feed

• 
• Text smaller
• Text bigger

162

NEW YORK – Is Obama helping advance a grand plan by Turkey, with the support of Germany, to restore the Ottoman Empire, the Islamic caliphate that controlled much of southeast Europe, Western Asia and North Africa for more than six centuries?

That is a question posed by historian Robert E. Kaplan in an article titled “The U.S. Helps Reconstruct the Ottoman Empire,” published this week by the international policy council and think tank Gatestone Institute.

Kaplan, a historian with a doctorate from Cornell University, specializing in modern Europe, says history suggests a possible partnership between Turkey and Germany, which has seen influence over Turkey as a means of influencing Muslims worldwide for its own interests.

He asks why the U.S. government “would actively promote German aims,” including the destruction of Yugoslavia in the 1990s and the re-creation of the Ottoman Empire through the “Arab Spring.”

Kaplan points to Obama’s support of the Muslim Brotherhood, the ultimate victor in the “Arab Spring”; the U.S. backing of radical Islamic “rebel” groups in Libya with ties to al-Qaida; and current support for similarly constituted radical Islamic “rebel” groups in Syria aligned with al-Qaida.

Each of these U.S. military interventions occurred in areas that were under the Ottoman Empire.

Bring back the Ottoman Empire?

Kaplan sees a similarity between the Clinton-era attacks against the Serbs and the Obama administration hostility to well-established regimes in Libya and Syria.

He writes:

Since the mid-1990s the United States has intervened militarily in several internal armed conflicts in Europe and the Middle East: bombing Serbs and Serbia in support of Izetbegovic’s Moslem Regime in Bosnia in 1995, bombing Serbs and Serbia in support of KLA Moslems of Kosovo in 1999, bombing Libya’s Gaddafi regime in support of rebels in 2010. Each intervention was justified to Americans as motivated by humanitarian concerns: to protect Bosnian Moslems from genocidal Serbs, to protect Kosovo Moslems from genocidal Serbs, and to protect Libyans from their murderous dictator Muammar Gaddafi.

Kaplan observes that neither President Clinton nor President Obama ever mentioned the reconstitution of the Ottoman Empire as a justification for U.S. military intervention.

The U.S. offered other reasons for intervening in Serbia, including a desire to gain a strategic foothold in the Balkans, to defeat communism in Yugoslavia, to demonstrate to the world’s Muslims that the U.S. is not anti-Muslim, and to redefine the role of NATO in the post-Cold War era.

Recurring pattern

At its height in the 15th and 16th centuries, the Ottoman Empire stretched from its capital in Turkey, through the Muslim-populated areas of North Africa, Iraq, the costal regions of the Arabian Peninsula and parts of the Balkans.

Kaplan points out that since the 1990s, “each European and Middle Eastern country that experienced American military intervention in an internal military conflict or an ‘Arab Spring’ has ended up with a government dominated by Islamists of the Moslem Brotherhood or al-Qaida variety fits nicely with the idea that these events represent a return to Ottoman rule.”

In these conflicts, Kaplan sees recurring patterns employed by Clinton and Obama to justify U.S. military intervention:

Each U. S. military action in Europe and the Middle East since 1990, however, with the exception of Iraq, has followed an overt pattern: First there is an armed conflict within the country where the intervention will take place. American news media heavily report this conflict. The “good guys” in the story are the rebels. The “bad guys,” to be attacked by American military force, are brutally anti-democratic, and committers of war crimes, crimes against humanity, and genocide. Prestigious public figures, NGOs, judicial and quasi-judicial bodies and international organizations call for supporting the rebels and attacking the regime. Next, the American president orders American logistical support and arms supplies for the rebels. Finally the American president orders military attack under the auspices of NATO in support of the rebels. The attack usually consists of aerial bombing, today’s equivalent of the nineteenth and twentieth centuries’ gunboat which could attack coastal cities of militarily weak countries without fear of retaliation. The ultimate outcome of each American intervention is the replacement of a secular government with an Islamist regime in an area that had been part of the Ottoman Empire.

Kaplan cites a recent report published by John Rosenthal in the online Asian Times that discloses reports prepared by the German foreign intelligence service, the BND, attributing the massacre in the Syrian town of Houla on May 25, 2012, to the Syrian government.

Rosenthal linked the conclusions of the BND regarding the Houla massacre to the policy of the German government to support the Syrian rebellion and its political arm, the Syrian National Council.

Recalling that Germany invaded Serbia in both World Wars I and II and actively sought the destruction of Yugoslavia in the Cold War era, Kaplan wonders if the administration’s joining with Germany in the bombing of Libya, and possibly Syria as well, is an effort to help Germany fill its foreign policy objective of restoring the Ottoman Empire.

Kaplan notes that the Obama administration’s foreign policy requires it to downplay the Muslim Brotherhood and al-Qaida terrorist threat to U.S. national security.

Al-Qaida defeated, or embraced?

In the 2012 presidential campaign, Obama spoke at a campaign event in Las Vegas one day after the Sept. 11 Benghazi attack, proclaiming, “A day after 9/11, we are reminded that a new tower rises above the New York skyline, but al-Qaeida is on the path to defeat and bin Laden is dead.”

On Nov. 1, 2012, CNSNews.com reported that Obama had described al-Qaida as having been “decimated,” “on the path to defeat,” or some other variation at least 32 times since the attack on the U.S. consulate in Benghazi. It was a theme Obama repeated last week in his counter-terrorism policy speech at the National Defense University at Fort McNair in Washington, D.C.

Obama also has advanced a narrative expressing U.S. acceptance of Islam.

In his foreign policy speech delivered at Cairo University June 4, 2009, Obama explained he had known Islam “on three continents before coming to the region where it was first revealed.”

In a joint press availability with Turkey’s President Gul at Cankaya Palace in Ankara, Turkey, on April 6, 2009, Obama repudiated U.S. history since George Washington, declaring the U.S. is not a Christian country: “And I’ve said before that one of the great strengths of the United States is – although as I mentioned, we have a very large Christian population, we do not consider ourselves a Christian nation or a Jewish nation or a Muslim nation; we consider ourselves a nation of citizens who are bound by ideals and a set of values.”

Yet, despite Obama’s attempt to establish a narrative in which Islamic terrorism is not a threat to U.S. national security, evidence abounds that the radical Islamic rebels responsible for opposing Gadhafi in Libya and Assad in Syria have extensive ties to al-Qaida.

In September 2012, WND also broke the story that the slain U.S. ambassador, Christopher Stevens, played a central role in recruiting jihadists to fight the Syria regime, according to Egyptian security forces.

In December 2012, WND reported top level al-Qaida operatives are functioning with impunity in Libya under a NATO-established provisional government.

In February 2013, WND reported that the U.S. special mission in Benghazi was used to coordinate Arab arms shipments and other aid to rebels in Libya who are known to be saturated by al-Qaida and other Islamic terrorist groups.

On May 14, 2013, WND reported the attack that killed Stevens and three other Americans was an al-Qaida revenge killing that took place one day after al-Qaida chief Ayman al-Zawahiri called for retaliation for a U.S. drone strike that killed a top Libyan al-Qaida leader.

Formed by Osama bin Laden, al-Qaida is a Sunni Islamic organization, whereas the Assad regime in Syria has been arguably a client state of Iran, the only nation in the Middle East in which a majority of the Muslims are Shiites.

The conflict between Sunni and Shiite Muslims dates back to the founding of Islam when a split took place over who should succeed Muhammad, when he died in AD 632. Sunnis comprise about 75 to 90 percent of the world’s Muslims.

The Muslim Brotherhood that has come to power in the African Islamic states following the “Arab Spring” is a Sunni Islam-dominated organization that opposes the Shiites in Iran on religious grounds.

On Jan. 3, 2013, WND reported that the Muslim Brotherhood has penetrated the Obama White House, with several American Muslim leaders who work with the Obama administration identified as Muslim Brotherhood operatives who have significant influence on U.S. policy.

On Feb. 10, 2013, WND reported President Obama’s nominee to head the CIA, John Brennan, converted to Islam years ago in Saudi Arabia.

Arguably, the Obama administration’s policy of siding with the rebels in Libya and Syria may reflect the aim of isolating Shiite-dominated Iran from the rest of the Islamic world.

The logical expectation would be that a recreated Ottoman Empire headquartered in Turkey would be a Sunni organization, reflecting the Sunni-dominance in Turkey.

The Gatestone Institute website describes the organization as a non-partisan, not-for-profit international policy council and think tank dedicated “to educating the public about what the mainstream media fails to report.”

As the organization’s website explains, “Gatestone Institute conducts national and international conferences, briefings and events for its members and others, with world leaders, journalists and experts – analyzing, strategizing, and keeping them informed on current issues, and where possible recommending solutions.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/05/historian-obama-helping-resurrect-ottoman-empire/#LdDL36jYC6JzXbgq.99 

The REAL IRS Scandal is that the IRS Exists

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

The REAL IRS Scandal is that the IRS Exists

Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 29-May-2013 15:03:45

Congressman Louie Gohmert stands out as a real class act. Recent years have seen a severe restriction in the ability of citizens to tour Capitol Hill, limiting access to a new visitor center and vanilla-guided tours on strict paths and schedules. Gohmert will happily get you around that. Members of the House hold the privilege to escort visitors virtually anywhere, and Gohmert has become well known among his constituents and friends for his impassioned late-night tours littered with an encyclopedic knowledge of American history. He has been known to spend up to five hours with groups touring the Capitol, and clearly cares about infecting those he encounters with his love of the United States and its founding principles. Thus it comes as no surprise when he prescribes the simplest of solutions to the ongoing scandal involving the federal targeting of Tea Party groups for extra scrutiny. “We need to be dismantling the IRS,” Gohmert told PJ Media. Gohmert’s former colleague from the Texas congressional delegation concurs, as reported by the Washington Times: Former Rep. Ron Paul of Texas called the recent IRS fiasco troubling — but writes that the only way Congress can protect the freedoms of Americans from a long pattern of suspected IRS abuse is to “shutter the doors” of the agency “once and for all.” … “The bipartisan tradition of using the IRS as a tool to harass political opponents suggests that the problem is deeper than just a few ‘rogue’ IRS agents — or even corruption within one, two, three or many administrations,” Dr. Paul writes in his weekly column, “Texas Straight Talk. “Instead, the problem [lies] in the extraordinary power the tax system grants the IRS.” Conservative talk radio host Mark Levin, excerpted in the video above, calls the recent scandals examples of tyrannical government. All of these men prove correct. As the IRS scandal continues to develop, it highlights a deeper and more fundamental injustice in our social order, an ongoing First Amendment crisis fostered by the intersection of tax policy, campaign finance regulation, and civil rights law. Any response to this most recent episode which does not address the root systematic injustice will be incomplete, inadequate, and morally inexcusable.

 2  0  0  0  2

LINK 3 more pages

Russia warns about WW III over Monsanto - supported by the US Congress and the Admin

Sent: Wednesday, May 29, 2013 5:13 PM
Subject: : Russia warns about WW III over Monsanto - supported by the US Congress and the Admin

WW III over Monsanto - supported by the US Congress and the Admin

Scroll down to read about the meeting between Kerry and Putin Some of this content is hidden on the Internet – forward asap … TV and press are not reporting on this topic. This administration and Senate allowed the WICKED corporation, Monsanto, to continue in this country poisoning our Land.  They've created Frankenstein TOXIC Modified foods which occupies over 50% of our grocery store foods (Vegetable & Fruit GMO’s). It has been proven over and over that ‘in time’ it terribly effects our health thru out our Digestive Tract/Gut. It creates Allergies, Breast Cancer and ORGAN DAMAGE etc etc yet this current Administration and our SENATE placed MONSANTO’s top corporate employees thru-out our Gov’s agencies.  They control our FOODS & EPA, AND signed & secretly passed an alleged LAW that this Organization CAN NEVER BE SUED, no matter how badly they destroy our HEALTH.  They can destroy our Eco System/Bees, etc and poison any Citizen in this country AND, Monsanto doesn’t even have to LABEL the foods stating their Genetically MODIFIED!!!!!  WHAT????  WHY on earth would ANY Gov do this to their People?  Unless, the Banksters (Wealthy Elite), who OWN some or MOST of the Medical Society & Big Pharmas, inwhich gain great riches & control over people who are sick? Switzerland, France, Italy, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine, all of whom had previously banned these most dangerous of genetically altered organisms from being used on the continent. ….settled a class-action lawsuit in the US for $105 million after it was discovered they had contaminated the drinking supply of some 52 million Americans in more than 2,000 water districts with its “gender-bending” herbicide Atrazine. “A single corn kernel coated with a neonicotinoid can kill a songbird,” Palmer said. “Even a tiny grain of wheat or canola treated with the oldest neonicotinoid — called imidacloprid — can fatally poison a bird. AMERICA, wake UP!  Other countries have BANNED this MODIFIED food and Monsanto’s CHEMICALS, and people are PROTESTING in the STREETS all over the world to take these chemicals & food OUT of the World, as it’s also killing the bees and our Eco system - the article below states this will most likely lead into a World War over this deadly food, which right now is allowed graciously to be fed to U.S. citizens, children, animals and these deadly chemicals are continued to be allowed in America!!!!!! And, Yet every day Americans eat it like CANDY with No concern, from Monsanto’s fresh Veggies & Fruits etc etc, to their other Toxic Chemicals & run-off waste!  BAN THESE FOODS & chemicals asap (see Below)!  Also, there are FOREIGN proteins in this GMO food that the stomach acids cannot DIGEST so these proteins stick like glue and eventually may penetrate thru the stomach wall, the intestines and then get into the BLOOD creating HAVOC in Your BODY!  This modified food is FOREIGN to our bodies – and is one of the bottom line issues to MANY HEALTH AILMENTS AND alleged Dis-eases!  EAT Gluten Free, & From Local Farmers, and ORGANIC USDA, and stop buying prepared foods and/Veggies-Fruits in the grocery!!!!! Here is an article (below) that came out of Europe, that the Gov Agencies HERE tried to SQUASH from our Internet and Media!  Check it out!!!  Low and Behold, you have it!   Let's start WWIII... over Monsanto. It appears that someone doesn't want this EU Times article to be seen since none of the links would open.  Does that mean in possible government internet-hacker-speak "we don't want this info out there and known by the public"...?  Well, then, let's just make it go viral on our own!!! I finally found a way in to get it to open, so here is the article...Laurel Russia Warns Obama: Global War Over “Bee Apocalypse” Coming Soon Posted by EU Times on May 10th, 2013 // 156 Comments The shocking minutes relating to President Putin’s meeting this past week with US Secretary of State John Kerry reveal the Russian leaders “extreme outrage” over the Obama regimes continued protection of global seed and plant bio-genetic giants Syngenta and Monsanto in the face of a growing “bee apocalypse” that the Kremlin warns “will most certainly” lead to world war. According to these minutes, released in the Kremlin today by the Ministry of Natural Resources and Environment of the Russian Federation (MNRE), Putin was so incensed over the Obama regimes refusal to discuss this grave matter that he refused for three hours to even meet with Kerry, who had traveled to Moscow on a scheduled diplomatic mission, but then relented so as to not cause an even greater rift between these two nations. At the center of this dispute between Russia and the US, this MNRE report says, is the “undisputed evidence” that a class of neuro-active insecticides chemically related to nicotine, known as neonicotinoids, are destroying our planets bee population, and which if left unchecked could destroy our world’s ability to grow enough food to feed its population. So grave has this situation become, the MNRE reports, the full European Commission (EC) this past week instituted a two-year precautionary ban (set to begin on 1 December 2013) on these “bee killing” pesticides following the lead of Switzerland, France, Italy, Russia, Slovenia and Ukraine, all of whom had previously banned these most dangerous of genetically altered organisms from being used on the continent. Two of the most feared neonicotinoids being banned are Actara and Cruiser made by the Swiss global bio-tech seed and pesticide giant Syngenta AG which employs over 26,000 people in over 90 countries and ranks third in total global sales in the commercial agricultural seeds market. Important to note, this report says, is that Syngenta, along with bio-tech giants Monsanto, Bayer, Dow and DuPont, now control nearly 100% of the global market for genetically modified pesticides, plants and seedswarned our whole planet is in danger, and as we can, in part, read: “As part of a study80a50f008f4e9ba3c9ffb187c570a65152" target="_blank" title="">criminally charged in Germany for concealing the fact that its genetically modified corn killed cattle, and settled a class-action lawsuit in the US for $105 million after it was discovered they had contaminated the drinking supply of some 52 million Americans in more than 2,000 water districts with its “gender-bending” herbicide Atrazine. This staggeringly frightful situation is, the MNRE says, highlighted in the report issued this past March by the American Bird Conservancy (ABC) wherein they warned our whole planet is in danger, and as we can, in part, read: “As part of a study on impacts from the world’s most widely used class of insecticides, nicotine-like chemicals called neonicotinoids, American Bird Conservancy (ABC) has called for a ban on their use as seed treatments and for the suspension of all applications pending an independent review of the products’ effects on birds, terrestrial and aquatic invertebrates, and other wildlife. “It is clear that these chemicals have the potential to affect entire food chains. The environmental persistence of the neonicotinoids, their propensity for rung season is all that is needed to af, and their cumulative and largely irreversible mode of action in invertebrates raise significant environmental concerns,” said Cynthia Palmer, co-author of the report and Pesticides Program Manager for ABC, one of the nation’s leading bird conservation organizations. ABC commissioned world renowned environmental toxicologist Dr. Pierre Mineau to conduct the research. The 100-page report, “The Impact of the Nation’s Most Widely Used Insecticides on Birds,” reviews 200 studies on neonicotinoids including industry research obtained through the US Freedom of Information Act. The report evaluates the toxicological risk to birds and aquatic systems and includes extensive comparisons with the older pesticides that the neonicotinoids have replaced. The assessment concludes that the neonicotinoids are lethal to birds and to the aquatic systems on which they depend. “A single corn kernel coated with a neonicotinoid can kill a songbird,” Palmer said. “Even a tiny grain of wheat or canola treated with the oldest neonicotinoid — called imidacloprid — can fatally poison a bird. And as little as 1/10th of a neonicotinoid-coated corn seed per day during egg-laying season is all that is needed to affect reproduction.” The new report concludes that neonicotinoid contamination levels in both surface- and ground water in the United States and around the world are already beyond the threshold found to kill many aquatic invertebrates.” Quickly following this damning report, the MRNE says, a large group of group of American beekeepers and environmentalists sued the Obama regime over the continued use of these neonicotinoids stating: “We are taking the EPA to court for its failure to protect bees from pesticides. Despite our best efforts to warn the agency about the problems posed by neonicotinoids, the EPA continued to ignore the clear warning signs of an agricultural system in trouble.” Regarding how bad the world’s agricultural system has really become due to these genetically modified plants, pesticides and seeds, this report continues, can be seen by the EC’s proposal this past week, following their ban on neonicotinoids, in which they plan to criminalize nearly all seeds and plants not registered with the European Union, and as we can, in part, read: “Europe is rushing towards the good ol days circa 1939, 40… A new law proposed by the European Commission would make it illegal to “grow, reproduce or trade” any vegetable seeds that have not been “tested, approved and accepted” by a new EU bureaucracy named the “EU Plant Variety Agency.” It’s called the Plant Reproductive Material Law, and it attempts to put the government in charge of virtually all plants and seeds. Home gardeners who grow their own plants from non-regulated seeds would be considered criminals under this law.” This MRNE report points out that even though this EC action may appear draconian, it is nevertheless necessary in order to purge the continent from continued contamination of these genetically bred “seed monstrosities.” Most perplexing in all of this, the MRNE says, and which led to Putin’s anger at the US, has been the Obama regimes efforts to protect pesticide-producer profits over the catastrophic damaging being done to the environment, and as the Guardian News Service detailed in their 2 May article titled “US rejects EU claim of insecticide as prime reason for bee colony collapse” and which, in part, says: “The European Union voted this week for a two-year ban on a class of pesticides, known as neonicotinoids, that has been associated with the bees’ collapse. The US government report, in contrast, found multiple causes for the collapse of the honeybees.” To the “truer” reason for the Obama regimes protection of these bio-tech giants destroying our world, the MRNE says, can be viewed in the report titled “How did Barack Obama become Monsanto’s man in Washington?” and which, in part, says: “After his victory in the 2008 election, Obama filled key posts with Monsanto people, in federal agencies that wield tremendous force in food issues, the USDA and the FDA: At the USDA, as the director of the National Institute of Food and Agriculture, Roger Beachy, former director of the Monsanto Danforth Center. As deputy commissioner of the FDA, the new food-safety-issues czar, the infamous Michael Taylor, former vice-president for public policy for Monsanto. Taylor had been instrumental in getting approval for Monsanto’s genetically engineered bovine growth hormone.” Even worse, after Russia suspended the import and use of an Monsanto genetically modified corn following a study suggesting a link to breast cancer and organ damage this past September, the Russia Today News Service reported on the Obama regimes response: “The US House of Representatives quietly passed a last-minute addition to the Agricultural Appropriations Bill for 2013 last week – including a provision protecting genetically modified seeds from litigation in the face of health risks. The rider, which is officially known as the Farmer Assurance Provision, has been derided by opponents of biotech lobbying as the “Monsanto Protection Act,” as it would strip federal courts of the authority to immediately halt the planting and sale of genetically modified (GMO) seed crop regardless of any consumer health concerns. The provision, also decried as a “biotech rider,” should have gone through the Agricultural or Judiciary Committees for review. Instead, no hearings were held, and the piece was evidently unknown to most Democrats (who hold the majority in the Senate) prior to its approval as part of HR 993, the short-term funding bill that was approved to avoid a federal government shutdown.” On 26 March, Obama quietly signed this “Monsanto Protection Act” into law thus ensuring the American people have no recourse against this bio-tech giant as they fall ill by the tens of millions, and many millions will surely end up dying in what this MRNE report calls the greatest agricultural apocalypse in human history as over 90% of feral (wild) bee population in the US has already died out, and up to 80% of domestic bees have died out too.

THE ROOT OF THE BAD GUYS

Subject: wow THE ROOT OF THE BAD GUYS

1.    http://www.blogtalkradio.com/walking-in-energy/2013/05/19/walking-in-energy

2.    http://wolfspiritradio.com/dl/download.php?id=Andrew_Bartzis_Adventures_In_Reality/2013   SECOND LISTEN TO THE "WIE SHOW 05/26/2013, THIS IS THE SECOND PART OF THE ONE ABOVE."   

WOWOW!!!

Bush cancels Europe trip amid calls for his arrest

Bush cancels Europe trip amid calls for his arrest

Posted By: TwinFlame [Send E-Mail]
Date: Wednesday, 29-May-2013 19:00:16

http://www.salon.com/2011/02/07/bush_amnesty_arrest/print

http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278241

Google and the NSA Connection

Google and the NSA Connection

Posted By: SARTRE
Date: Wednesday, 29-May-2013 05:29:42

The data mining technology that is integral to the Google AdWords experience is a power tool in creating an individual profile for anyone who surfs the web. The amazing capacity to target specific ads to personal search topics, geographic locations and web history is the harbinger of a total recall on your personality. If the benefits of getting relevant advertisement that maximize sales opportunities were the only purpose of the process, the relatively benign intrusion of a materialistic message might be tolerable to most internet users. However, the bull in the china shop is not merely in the business of making a commercial profit. Google is a wonder creation of the calculate surveillance society. Read the entire article on the Negotium archive page http://www.batr.org/negotium/052913.html Discuss or comment about this essay on the BATR Forum http://forum.batr.net/showthread.php?tid=2685   http://www.batr.org/negotium/052913.html http://www.rumormillnews.com/cgi-bin/forum.cgi?read=278176