"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 39

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 39
by Sherman H. Skolnick 9/25/03

Finger-pointers are dealt with in many ways. Some are simply written off as imagining official bureaus are corrupt. Their protests are blocked as having no basis. Or, that they are paranoid, and require medical if not psychiatric attention. Or, that they are just malcontents, and should be ignored.
If a real reformer shows up, they are sent away with empty promises of correction. If judges are identified as corrupt and bribe-takers, the would-be crusader is barred from the courthouse as a "security risk". If that does not end the agitation for redress of grievances---well, the judges could certainly reach into their cauldron of powers and pull up, from the mists and vapors of antiquity, invoking thus the judge-created offense of "contempt of court". That would certainly preclude the tribunal from having to hear "trouble-makers".
If demands for government reform or improvement persist, the "powers that be", the Establishment, the Ruling Class---in short THEM---could concoct a frame-up. After all, a few per cent of those in prison are innocent but actually political prisoners. Others there may just need hospital attention.
A group of researchers and investigators assisted in the details of a proceeding to bring out Fraud Upon the Courts, perpetrated by the Judges themselves upon their own Court. Among others implicated are judges on the U.S. Supreme Court and one-step below them, all the judges on the U.S. Court of Appeals, 7th Circuit, headquartered in Chicago. Some acted under a malign, if not corrupt, influence in respect to blockading mammoth claims against a major firm, Coca-Cola Company. There are many details. Such as apparent "leakage" into non-legal channels within the U.S. of cocaine, a by-product of the processing of coca leaves to make the secret base for Coca-Cola. So you thought all the clandestine cocaine was smuggled in from Columbia and such? Such as, implicated is George Herbert Walker Bush. Such as, an overlap of corrupting the Five-Judge majority on the U.S. Supreme Court, in the Bush versus Gore litigation, arbitrarily installing George W. Bush as the occupant and resident of the White House.
Step by step details are in my website story with the actual court papers attached (and voluminous court-filed Exhibits to be posted later) Coca-Cola, the CIA, and the Courts, Part 9, 9/22/3.
Perhaps the Judges cannot straight forward answer the charges of Fraud Upon the Court perpetrated by the Judges themselves on their own court. So now the reformers are facing an apparent frame-up. The Bush Justice Department reportedly is set to claim that the court clean-up group committed federal criminal offenses by procuring an elite team of assassins physically endangering two judges on the U.S. Supreme Court, part of the 5-Judge majority that installed the younger Bush in the Oval Office. Is it just a coincidence that these are the same two high court Justices identified as corrupted in the demand for the investigation of Fraud Upon the U.S. Supreme Court?
And, that those who seek to publicly condemn the depraved jurists as corrupt, are also accused of supervising a band of ruffians. Doing what? Why, harassing "liars and whores of the press", that is, shoving around newsfakers who cover up for the Bush Crime Family. Does this include Washington Post hotshot Bob Woodward, whose late father was a highly corrupt Chicago-area Chief Judge? Little-known, that Du Page County Chief Judge Alfred Woodward, in an unpublicized case, arbitrarily awarded millions and millions of dollars from an insurance fraud case to Nixon White House Watergate Figures (the little-mentioned Equity Funding case of the 1970s---we have the files to prove it. And more, Chief Judge Woodward, like his son Bob, was a key figure in the espionage Establishment).
And who is accused, apparently by the Bush Justice Department, of financing these "domestic terrorists"? Why, Albert Gore, Jr., considered by some, if not many, as the duly elected President NOT INAUGURATED. Planned reportedly by the federal prosecutors is to rely on the Patriots Act, which has cancelled many of the guarantees of the Bill of Rights.
Additional Bush Justice Department federal criminal charges reportedly contend that aiding and abetting this "interference" with American high-level judges and media honchos, is a Canadian broadcaster who on a major show, known as a "blow torch" radio facility(maximum power station), broadcast from Toronto and also carried ON-LINE, supposedly foments related sedition directed against the current U.S. regime.
Will the whistle-blowers be dealt with in a Kangaroo Court. And then, sent away to an American Gulag?

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar39.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 38

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 38
by Sherman H. Skolnick 8/11/03

There are examples throughout history of the making of Empires and the breaking up of the same.
How did a small group of islands take over sizeable land and treasure all over the world? Simple. The British are the leading experts on studying the ways of other peoples and other places. They have for centuries figured out the schemes to grab what they want by turning groups against one another. India and China are examples. South Africa another case to consider.
As discussed in this website series, the British have vowed to take back the land called America, reverting the inhabitants to being mere subjects of the Monarchy in Britain, and the continent to being mere colonies of the Crown. They failed in fomenting the bloody American Civil War, also known as the War Between the States, to turn historic trends against each other. The dirty trick included instigating states to breakaway from the central government, forming the Confederacy, yet based on natural hatred between the industrial North and the slave-agricultural South.
And the British during World War One seized portions of the failing Turkish Ottoman Empire, which included portions of the Mid-East, such as now called Iraq. Like in the attempt to wreck the American Empire, the British by the 1930s had to abandon Iraq and later were involved in controlling the Peacock Throne, Persia, Iran.
By the late 1980s, through their secret political police, the U.S. was well along to breaking up the Soviet Empire, previously known as the Czarist Russian Empire. A super secret unit of the U.S. Treasury, in combination with the American CIA, produced a superior quality counterfeit Soviet paper currency, the ruble. Also used, in part, was a flood of superior quality countefeit U.S. paper currency, that is, Federal Reserve Notes, masquerading as the "U.S. Dollar".
The bogus paper money was produced by a team of world-class engravers, known in the counterfeit trade as "master cutters". [Discussed earlier in this series.] The details became known in that Daddy Bush, as President together with the CIA and the Treasury, failed to pay the counterfeiters. A little-known federal court case deals with the hang-up. The counterfeiters demanded absolute proof that they would be paid the huge, promised fees in valid, not bogus, money.
So the Moscow government was toppled the classic way, with being financially undermined with super-duper fake money.
The result? The breakaway provinces of what was previously the Soviet Empire. The Russians with great military means but suffering huge casualties, have been seeking to punish some of these breakaway pieces of their vast land, treasures, minerals, and such.
mailto:k@ameritech.net
The Bush Crime Family, jointly with Bill and Hillary Clinton as cohorts, have not given up on pro-British diabolical methods to divide up the States, not OF AMERICA, but IN AMERICA. As we have shown, the Bushies have a One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account with the Queen of England, in her private enterprise, Coutts Bank London. [Related documents are in our website series "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush"; copies of the One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account have been circulated by us, and an authenticated copy is part of the website of a radio talk show which has me on from time to time, <http://www.cloakanddagger.ca/>http://www.cloakanddagger.ca/]
The One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account, the Bushies/the Queen, is made up from private partnership funds of Daddy Bush and Saddam Hussein, a creation of the American CIA. [Little-known federal case in Chicago that dealt with this, where I was the only journalist covering it, is dealt with in detail in our website story "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh".]
n its simplest form, Enron and Arthur Andersen accounting, were dirty tricks of the American CIA, in with Carylyle Group, the Bush Crime Family, as run in part by former top British government officials. Enron officials reportedly arranged to falsify out-of-state electric transmissions to California. Thus created, was a fraudulent shortage of electric power in California right before and right after the alleged presidential "election" of 2000. The California authorities, fighting "brown-outs" and actual "black-outs", had to pay as much as ten times the usual rate for electric power transmission from the grid.
To deal with an almost impossible monstrous deficit, California authorities have quietly been exploring avenues of rescue. They have secretly explored the idea of California becoming a breakaway STATE IN AMERICA. Some believe this is not quite the same as the states that brokeaway, instigated by the British, to form the Confederacy.
For this purpose, to have funds to pay their expenses, the California State authorities are considering to blockade California funds being sent to the Central Government in Washington, D.C., as "federal taxes", income taxes, withholding taxes, and other federal fees and expenses. The gathering emergency situation would justify such an action. BUT, how can it be carried out? The State authorities can freeze accounts in banks located in California, about to transmit federal tax funds to the Internal Revenue Service and the U.S. Treasury. The largest bank chain in California has been Bank of America, and its holding firm, Bank America. Once headquartered in San Francisco, they now have their headquarters in North Carolina. By the way, some deem them already insolvent because of horrendous gambling by them in gold and oil derivatives, speculators' hocus-pocus, in the trillions of dollars jointly with J.P. Morgan Chase.
Another groups of banks operating in California is Wells Fargo, a major function of which is to funnel covert CIA funds for operations in Asia and the Pacific Basin. Some contend major Wells Fargo stockholder, Warren Buffet, actually has his so-called "fortune" secretly based on CIA operations in illicit transactions, such as dope. Most every bank located in California has as major owners, the huge Japanese mafia, the Yakuza. [Visit our website series on the Yakuza.]
In anticipation of this, the Bush White House has formulated several plans. [1] Scheme Number One. Before the California Governor Recall Movement got so heated up, the Rasputin of the White House, the sinister Karl Rove, worked an apparent deal with Arnold Schwarzenegger to somehow push him in as the new California Governor. The weight-lifting steroid-using movie star is perfect. The Bush Family, as documented beyond challenge, helped install Adolf Hitler. [Such as "The Unauthorized Biography of George Bush", published in 1992, authors Webster Griffin Tarpley and Anton Chaitkin.Some websites have the entire book.Use a search engine.]
Arnold has a suitable Pro-Nazi background, and marrying Maria Shriver, whose father married into the Kennedy Family, is in with a group whose patriarch, Joseph P. Kennedy, was Pro-Hitler while U.S.Ambassador to London up to 1940.
Arnold's father, in Austria, was reportedly an official of the Nazi Party. In the 1980s, Arnold actively promoted the election to a top post in Austria of Kurt Waldheim. The former U.N. chief Waldheim had carefully concealed that in World War Two, he was part of an elite unit in the Nazi military committing atrocities against Jews and others in the Balkans.
[2] Scheme Number Two.To counter this or actually to take advantage of the situation of emergency, the occupant and resident of the White House has planned either to nationalize the California State National Guard, or to call up U.S. Military Reservists. What is the justification?
The U.S. Constitution, Article IV, Section 4 provides:
"The United States shall guarantee to every State in this Union a Republican Form of Government, and shall protect each of them against Invasion; and on Application of the Legislature, or of the Exectutive (when the Legislature cannot be convened) against domestic Violence."
[Cynics jointly with know-nothings, seeing the old-time language using capital letters of the Constitution, would prefer the ludicrous version that Bush could install a GOP form of government, that is a REPUBLICAN FORM OF GOVERNMENT. Ha, ha.]
This purportedly empowers the occupant and resident of the White House, assuming he still retain his powers as purported Commander-in-Chief, to send in troops to deal with a version of uprising against the Central Government. In an exclusive story in our Middle-Finger News series, we raise the apparent issue that key forces within the U.S. Military and elsewhere in the Central Government, have quietly taken away the "football" from George W. Bush, that is, the suitcase by Marine Guard carrying the nuclear codes. A week before he was forced to resign facing Impeachment, Nixon had the "football" taken away from him by Nixon White House Chief of Staff, General Alexander Haig, as the General was ordered by his Jesuit relative.
I first raised related issues a few days after the alleged presidential "election" in the year 2000. Visit our website earlier story, "The Breakaway States IN AMERICA". Also as to dealing with an emergency visit our 2/5/1 item "The American Troika".
Is the situation in California made-to-order for the Bush Crime Family, as instigated by the British Crown, to cancel the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights? Is it because we ae facing terrible military disasters in Iraq and Afghanistan? Is it because the real facts of 9-11 are about to become more well known, that the Arabs were NOT directly involved, but that it was a bloody scheme, to sacrifice ordinary Americans to instigate a war. See the book with the documents, that came out right before 9-11, "Body of Secrets" by James Bamford, detailing the crazies in the Joint Chiefs of Staff and their plan, Northwoods Project, to instigate a war against Cuba. It reads much like 9-11.
Other bankrupt states in the Southwest are quietly considering the plan of becoming Breakaway STATES IN AMERICA, including Arizona, Colorado, Orgeon, and the State of Washington.

More coming....Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar38.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 37

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 37
by Sherman H. Skolnick 7/27/03

Testing A Coup

Supposing there was a sizeable military unit. And they threatened violence in the main city of the Republic. They demanded that the President and the Cabinet resign. Why? The rebellious military accused them of corruption and the Presi dent of orchestrating fake terrorist violence by way of controlling the country that way.
Was there such a test and who instigated it? The experiment was in progress on July 27, 2003, in Manila, the Republic of the Philippines. (The capital being Quezon City.)
The President stated, that as Commander-in-Chief, she is informing the rebellious military unit that they crossed the line of professionalism. That she is giving them such and such number of hours to surrender or forces will be sent to put down the rebellion (implying that there were forces loyal to her as President and Commander-in-Chief).
In 1972, a previous Philippine President, to entrench his dictatorial power, staged fake would-be-violence against himself, stating there was in the works, a movement to overthrow him. That Philippine President thereafter, suspended th e Philippine Constitution invoking Martial Law. These tests were/are important because the Philippine Constitution is patterned after, if not identical, to the U.S. Constitution and Bill of Rights.
Was it an "accidental" happening in 1972? Is it just a coincidence in 2003, when the occupant and resident of the U.S. White House was installed by a Military-Style, five person Junta of the U.S. Supreme Court? And that drumhead Justic e installed who was to be the occupant and resident of the White House. Were ordinary Americans aware of, if not shocked, by what some called "The Gang of Five", declaring in a just-before-Midnight proclamation that Americans have no fundamental right to vote for President, rather, just a very limited right to vote for Presidential Electors who, in turn, meeting as the Electoral College, after the supposed Presidential Election, to themselves choose who, if anyone, is to be in the White House.
Through website and foreign news items, important questions have been raised. [1] That the tragedy of September 11, 2001, did not, in being actually carried out, involve Arabs. That the bloodshed against American s on that day was greatly patterned after the Northwoods Project, planned by dictatorial Joint Chiefs of Staff in 1962, wanting to justify an invasion of Cuba. The documents were first publicized in a book coming out shortly before 9-11, namely, "Body o f Secrets" by James Bamford, an expert on the super-secret NSA, the National Security Agency. 2] The Arabs were not actually on any of the accused aircraft in 9-11, but were blamed for the happenings by the White House with the aid of the lapdog press. Some of the Arabs were actually Saudi exchange students studying how to fly airplanes and such, while living on U.S. Military facilities. At least seven of the supposed 19 Arab hi-jackers actually are still alive residing in North Africa, among other places.
The problem of understanding 9-11 is purposely intensified by the oil-soaked, spy-riddled American monopoly press which promotes short attention span and that ordinary Americans are to be fed news like to eight year old children. So in reporting the coup test in Manila now, the press will purposely forget the prior Manila event of 1972 and Martial Law test.
Also part of the problem obstructing ordinary Americans from understanding all this is both the education system combined with the mass media.
The subject of the Aristocracy, the Establishment, "the powers that be", the Ruling Class, whatever THEY are called, is a forbidden topic. The criminal underpinnings of the Aristocracy is not a subject, in high schools, or colleges and universities. And the popular press does not/will not ever deal with such subjects. Why? Simple. It would cause ordinary Americans to be class conscious, unlike Europeans who generally are so aware of that. Those who control Congress, the White House a nd the Executive branch, as well as the Judiciary, from behind the scenes, are not identified, generally not pictured, or referred to.
Books such as "The Rich and The Super Rich", by Ferdinand Lundberg, published in 1968, are mostly unknown to many ordinary Americans. And his other opus, "The Myth of Democracy" is likewise so. Gustavus Myers' book, "The Great American Fortunes", published in the 1930s, and documenting the criminal past of the Ruling Families, is seldom nowadays referred to or to be found in many libraries. Some Americans are merely amused by Gore Vidal's blistering statements that those who rule us are not the ones we see on the television but persons behind the scenes.
Who dares refer to the Bush Crime Family? And that they are not the aristocracy but merely scapegoats and stooges for the plans of the British and the Monarchy, to take back this continent, reverting ordinary Americans to be just subje cts of British colonies. Who among the popular pundits in the press, on the tv or radio, refers to the persistent efforts of the British to overthrow the American central government? Starting, at least since the War of 1812, when in 1814, they burned do wn the U.S. Capitol? And what about the three U.S. Presidents assassinated for the benefit of the British who wanted to snuff out American industrial development (Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, and William McKinley. In addition, the American Civil War , seldom properly identified, was instigated by the British to promote the natural friction between the Industrial North and the Agricultural South, and the divisive issue of slavery. That is to divide up this nation, to Balkanize America).
It remains to be seen how the Manila experiment will play out. Has it been secretly instigated as a test later to be for real in the U.S.? Is the American Central Government facing military disasters in Afghanistan and Iraq? Has the most monstrous treason been committed against ordinary Americans? That is, treachery calculated to be falsely blamed onto Arabs, such as 9-11?
[NOTE: our stories are also listed on http://www.rense.com/ MAIN PAGE, left-hand side, click on COLUMNISTS Sherman Skolnick. THAT website often posts our stories sooner than our own website.]

More coming....Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar37.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 36

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 36
by Sherman H. Skolnick 7/15/03

The Judges and the Shadow Government

In law, there is a principle described as customs, practices, and usages. In simple terms, it means certain habits that those who rule us use by way of conducting themselves. BUT, these ingrained ways are generally not written down, ye t are clearly understood as the accepted and established way of government.

For example, in the South for a hundred years after the American Civil War, or as southerners call it The War Between The States, the customs, practices, and usages, were that whites would not  respect the Equal Protection of the Law guarantees as to blacks. Lynchings were condoned, and whites would eat their picnic lunch while watching blacks hanging from a tree. The Ku Klux Klan, although dominated some fifty per cent by FBI agents and informants, was more or less allowed to run wild and terrorize blacks. Some Federal judges, such as in Mississippi, were known to chase blacks out of their courts while hurling racial slurs against them. It was a customs, practice, and usage, that blacks had separate fountains to drink wa ter from, in public facilities.

In Chicago, we spoke to an  Afro-American lawyer, formerly a government official, who told us how the federal courts in Chicago likewise mistreat black attorneys, even now. He decided not to make any public statements about t he same. Italian-American lawyers told us similar things from first-hand experience. Namely, that lawyers of color and of certain ethnic groups, are looked down upon by the Chicago federal judges, some of whom are persons of color themselves. That is, t he judges prefer "pin-stripe" suit attorneys, WASPs (White Anglo-Saxon Protestants). No, it is not as blatant as having black attorneys drinking from a separate fountain. BUT, their petitions are routinely rejected, so that they cannot hope to make a li ving in the Chicago federal courts.

Some of the accepted ways of the judiciary, state and federal:

[1] The buying and selling of judgeships in courts at all levels. We discussed this in a website item "Buying a Judgeship". Because of certain circumstances, some of this is even coming out in the monopoly press. Such as "Ex-Judge gets 27 months in bribery case; U.S. still probing whether he paid for seat on bench". Chicago Tribune, 7/26/2002.

A popular website (www.worldnetdaily.com, 6/19/03)referred to a story in a major New York publication:
"In an admission that has New York Supreme Court [actually a lower court] in an uproar, a retired Brooklyn judge said he paid $35,000 to a Democratic leader more than three decades ago to get a seat on the bench, New York Newsday repor ts. The payment, says Thomas R. Jones, 89, was 'IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE CUSTOMS AND PRACTICES OF THE DAY', though he added, 'it was not right then, it's not right now' ".(Emphasis added.)

The article went on to discuss how judges and lawyers knew that certain lawyers were "bagmen", used as go-betweens of lawyers and corrupt jurists.

In our website series on "Coca-Cola, CIA, and the Courts", we mentioned how a known criminal-type bought the bench for Chicago Federal District Judge Blanche M. Manning[(312)435-7608]. An elite federal investigative unit, contacted us.

 Government investigators: "Your story, also in the court record, that Judge Manning's judgeship was bought, is not correct."

Citizen's Committee to Clean Up the Courts: "What is wrong with our court statement and our website story?"
Government investigators: "You state that her judgeship was bought for one million dollars by a known power-broker, described as a mobster. It is not a correct amount. Our inquiry has determined that the power-broker paid two million d ollars."

Citizen's Committee: "So, is that all you found wrong with our position on the buying of that Judgeship? That we mentioned a lower amount?"

Government investigators: "Yes, you have stated a wrong amount."

He did not inform us what, if anything, would be done against the Judge and her patron/judgeship buyer.

Since the buying of judgeships is a known custom, practice, and usage, what are the obvious conclusions? Such as, the criminal-types, or political power-brokers, that buy the judgeship and install someone of THEIR choice, then are in a position to profit in some way from the judge thus put in place. Some call it, pulling on the chain. (In the New York example, however, the retired Judge claimed it did not effect his rulings. Really?)

[2] The handling of court records. No accountability. There is a practice moreso in the federal courts in the U.S., of the judges NOT SIGNING THE COURT RULINGS by them, particularly so in civil cases. So, were you, as we have for decad es, to have examined decisions by U.S. District Judges and then their supervisors, the reviewing courts, U.S. Courts of Appeal, it is quite evident the Judges DO NOT SIGN THEIR NAME.

What is the rationale, off-the-record, and behind-the-scenes? Namely, that many of the federal court decisions are NOT made by the Judges who are simply a front. The decisions are made by law clerks, also "minute clerks" as they are re ferred to. In plain lingo, we have long since known that to corrupt the judiciary, you have to lean on their secretaries, their minute clerks, their law clerks, sometimes just the court bailiffs or deputy marshals, or their ghost-writing law profes sors. Further, in some instances, the decisions are written by former law school students or present or former law professors, particularly so where the judges are former law professors.

We have given as examples of corrupt practices, that three Chicago Federal Appeals Judges, and one judge on the U.S. Supreme Court, are all formerly from Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School. (7th Circuit Judges Richard A. Po sner (312) 435-5806); Frank H. Easterbrook (312) 435-5808, were law professors, and 7th Circuit Judge Diane P. Wood (312) 435-5521, was Dean of the Law School. U.S. Supreme Court Justice Antonin Scalia, was a professor there.)They commit perjury, in vio lation of the federal criminal code, in that they have failed to disclose that they, on the bench, represent the Billion Dollar stock and bond portfolio of Rockefeller's University of Chicago. This disclosure, which they have not made, is an annual mand atory judicial financial disclosure, failure to reveal the same by their signed form, being perjury, under federal law.
What is the problem with the judges, as is their custom, practice, and usage, not to sign their name to their rulings? The ghost-written decisions in important cases, not every case, contain judicial perjuries. That is, the established undisputed facts in the court record show it is DAY. To make a corrupt and arbitrary ruling, the judges' rulings say it is NIGHT, and apply NIGHT case law.

The litigant "loser" and/or their attorney is puzzled. Rarely, if ever, do lawyers confront the corrupt judges with their judicial perjury. Funny thing, since the decisions are often ghost-written, the judges, supposely in all candor, could say, but never do, "I did not write that. I know nothing about that decision. You can't hold me responsible and accountible. Why? Because I also did NOT sign it." It is a corrupt and rotten way of carrying out the unwritten customs, practices, and usages, of the Bench and the Bar.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar36.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 35

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 35
by Sherman H. Skolnick 6/26/03

High Court and High Crimes
In even the largest reference libraries, there are almost no books stating the true history of America's highest tribunal, the U.S. Supreme Court. The same is true of law libraries and those of law schools.
Early in the 19th Century, for upwards of 35 years, the Chief Justice of the high court was John Marshall. Portraits of him, in gold edged frames, hang in many law schools. In Chicago, a law school is named after him.
>From the beginning of this nation, one of the greatest crimes against the inhabitants here, was the huge land swindles. With the formation of the United States of America, formed from the 13 colonies, only the State Courts, not the Federal Courts, were equipped and inclined to combat terrible offenses committed by the plutocrats of that era.
Chief Justice Marshall, issuing a ruling of his court with flowery language, in so many words, arrogantly proclaimed that the federals are the dominant force and that the State Judges, are, in effect, mere vassals, handcuffed, powerless peons. Law stude nts, starry eyed from consuming perfumed windbags of idealistic law, are forever mouthing off that supposedly "wonderful" decision, Marbury versus Madison.
The Chief Justice's own brother was one of the great land swindlers whose case ended up in the high court. The Chief Justice did NOT disqualify himself. Guess who won in his crooked Court? Nowadays, as we have dared point out, the banker-judges sitting in high tribunals, likewise do not disqualify themselves when their own financial interests are the subject matter before their Court.
So, state court remedies against big land pirates, were snuffed out by the Chief Justice and his well-disguised pronouncements.
As set forth in this website series, since the War of 1812, when the British invaded this nation and burned down the Capitol, the British have repeatedly vowed to overthrow the American Republic, reverting this land to British rule, with Americans becom ing mere subjects of a London Monarchy, rather than citizens and residents of a duly formed Republic operating here.
For the benefit of British rulers, three U.S. Presidents were assassinated, Abraham Lincoln, James Garfield, and William McKinley, all of whom opposed British interference with the American industrial development. In its true significance, the America n Civil War, also known as the War Between the States, was in great part, instigated by the British. They added to the natural and historical friction between the industrial North, and the agricultural, non-industrial, slave-owning South. British ships ran the Northern blockade to supply the Confederacy with weapons made in England.
In preparation for civil war, the pro-British Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, Roger Taney, a devout Catholic (not really a contradiction), in 1856 added to the North-South agitation. He ruled in the Dred Scott case, that black slaves in America were mere chattel, mere baggage, that could be moved from place to place without any restraints of law. And get this, by the 21st Century, the Dred Scott decision has not been excised from the law books. [As to the concealed Catholic issue in American history, see the heavily documented opus, "The Rulers of Evil" by F. Tupper Saussy.]
In Persian Gulf War One, 1990-91, Daddy Bush, as President, sent great numbers of black GIs to fight for the backward Monarchies of Saudi and Kuwait. Yet, that late in the 20th Century, those two dictatorships had large numbers of black chattel slaves.
I was about the only one to raise the issue at the time that it was unconstitutional for an American ruler to send black soldiers to fight for the benefit and protection of black slave owners. [Visit part 30, of this website series.]
Published early in the 20th Century was a heavily-documented book, dealing with the U.S. Supreme Court as well as the legal history of America, "Supreme Court", by Gustavus Myers. The book is so much as banned, not to be usually found in even the larges t law libraries.
As to the post-Civil War era, see the book entitled simply "1876" by Gore Vidal. Published in 1976, it deals with how the 1876 Presidential election was stolen by corruption of Congress and the high court. Was it a mere concidence that the book was re-i ssued in paperback in the Spring of the year 2000, ahead of the presidential election? A key part of the theft of the presidency revolved in 1876---get this---on election ballot finagling in Florida. Samuel Tilden was the duly elected President but was blocked, apparently by federal troops, from approaching the Inauguation stands in 1877. In that year, like occurred in 2001 with George W. Bush, Rutherford Hayes became the "fictitious" president. Gore, like Tilden, was the duly elected President BUT NO T INAUGURATED. A result was many called him Rutherfraud. We see fit to call the present occupant, Bushfraud. Rutherford Hayes and his gang made corrupt deals, including with the U.S. Supreme Court. The result, a group of cases with the ominous title called "The Slaughter House" cases. In 1883, the high court arbitrarily nullified the federal civil rights laws of 1871, which had granted to blacks and others the right to bring their demand for remedies of injustice into the federal courts such as against nightriders of the Ku Klux Klan. The poisonous and corrupt high court ruling of 1883 was not corrected unti l almost 80 years later in the U.S. Supreme Court ruling in Monroe versus Pape, granting blacks the right to be in federal court Chicago to sue corrupt Chicago police who had a system of beating blacks until they admitted to something, in the meantime, arbitrarily shooting blacks in Chicago without established reasons or provocation, such as while the blacks were in their own apartment asleep.
In 1970, was formed a subcommittee to consider the possible impeachment of U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, for his links, while on the bench, in business with known gangsters, the Albert Parvin Foundation matter. Part of the subcommittee came to Chicago and met in my residence to hear and write down my testimony. The details about me, Chief Judge Campbell and high court Judge Douglas, became part of a U.S. government printed report. Most of the subcommittee agreed with me. The two judge s involved, however, hired lobbyists with suitcases of money who apparently leaned on the subcommittee and Justice William O. Douglas was not made subject to impeachment.
At a later date, I and my colleagues dug up data showing that Chief Judge Campbell was secretly the owner of several tall downtown Chicago buildings, all in the maiden name of his wife. Campbell used his judicial clout to compel several federal agencies to lease space in his skyscrapers, despite the fact that it was not appropriate to their work and was way overcharged per square foot. Judge Campbell moreover got into a ruckus with some of his former business partners who sued Campbell's cronies. My t estimony succeeded in wrecking the Chief Judge's extortion attempt against his former business partners.
In the 1930s, to the great injury and damage to ordinary Americans, the U.S. Supreme Court, packed with banker-judges, arbitrarily ruled in the gold clause cases that ordinary Americans cannot insist on gold to support contracts and other dealings. In19 37, President Franklin D. Roosevelt, the greatest counter-revolutionary in modern history, tried to get an arm-lock on the banker-judges by his own "court-packing" scheme, to fill up the court with more judges than previously by law provided for. The FD R trick failed, and the banker-judges succeeded in smashing down laws of Congress designed to alleviate the suffering of workers in the Great Depression.
In 1967, I brought as a Chicago voter, on behalf of myself and all other Chicago voters similarly situated, a class action federal suit (Skolnick versus Mayor & City Council of Chicago, U.S. District Court, Chicago.) I sought to remedy the situation whe rein Chicago's 50 election districts for City Council, called Wards, were grossly gerrymandered. That did not comply with the re-apportionment provisions of the Equal Protection clause of the 14th Amendment, requiring districts, wards, of equal populati on. Further, the ward boundary lines were so abitrarily drawn, that it prevented blacks and latinos from having proper representatives in the city government tribunal. The case was assigned to Chief District Judge William Campbell; despite me being self -educated in law, he ordered a lawyer to speak for me. I told the lawyer, who I did not authorize to speak for me, that if he did claim to speak for me, that I would sue him for malpractice in another court. In a stand-off, the Ch! ief Judge relented, and I was allowed to speak for myself as well as the class of Chicago voters. I proceeded with my suit under the "one man, one vote" doctrine. [Eventually, my litigation succeeded in getting more complete representation in the City Council fo r latinos and blacks.]
I filed a motion to remove Chief Judge Campbell from the case. As i showed, without challenge or dispute, the Chief Judge, while on the bench, was also the director of a gangster-operated money laundry, called the Albert Parvin Foundation, named for a C hicago hoodlum who moved to Nevada. Get this while on the bench of the U.S. Supreme Court, the President of the Albert Parvin Foundation was U.S. Supreme Court Justice William O. Douglas, a supposed liberal who in his spare time was a mountain-climber.
My city council case generated lots of mentions in the monopoly press, such as for 40 seconds or so on the radio or tv. So I came one day to the courtroom of Chief Judge Campbell to present my motion to remove him from the case. I asked that he disquali fy himself in that I and the Chicago voters could not be assured of a fair hearing and adjudication at his hands, he being in business with known gangsters, and thus subject to blackmail and corrupt manipulation.
Having heard of the expected hearing, eighteen reporters showed up, sitting right behind me as I silently waited my turn to present my motion to the Chief Judge. Without provocation, suddenly two of the Chief Judge's court bailiffs grabbed hold of my wh eelchair and began to turn me upside down. All of the reporters were witnesses to this outrage. None of their reports or comments appeared in print, on the radio, or on the tv. Chief Judge Campbell released a statement, that he heard from certain unspecified sources, that I was there, not to present any court papers, but rather to shoot him. He offered no details from my long public career to support such ridiculous contention s that I was anti-social and would use violence.
I brought a damage suit against his two court bailiffs, contending that I was the son of orthodox Jews and that I obeyed my parents orders never to handle or carry weapons. (Skolnick versus Guadno, et al., Chicago U.S. District Court.) My case ended up before the banker-judges in Chicago's federal appeals court. They ruled, in a law book published decision, that I was not entitled to any remedy. There was no dispute or challenge to the facts that I was there to seek to remove Chief Judge Campbell beca use of his undisputed position, while a judge, as a Director of a hoodlum Foundation. The judges ruled that despite the fact that I am a defenseless cripple silently sitting in a wheelchair in the courtroom, that the bailiffs were immune from being sued despite the undisputed facts that they perpetrated, in full view of 18 witnesses, an assault and battery upon me, without cause or provocation.
In 1971, I had won a successful verdict against the U.S. government spying on anti-war activists, like myself, while they pretended to be a news media service. (Skolnick versus 113th Military Intelligence Group, pretending to be Midwest Audio-Visual New s, Chicago U.S. District Court.) In 1971, William Rehnquist was the top U.S. Justice Department official heading a secret unit, arranging through ulterior means to block verdicts in federal court against spying by the U.S. Military against anti-war acti vists.A few years later, when being ratified as a new Associate Justice on the U.S. Supreme Court, Rehnquist sought to conceal this role from the U.S. Senate ratifying committee.
Later, Justice Rehnquist was the key judge on the high court in a ruling favoring Military Intelligence Units sued for illegal spying on anti-war activists. He did not disqualify himself and his rotten ruling destroyed the validity of my court verdict a gainst U.S. government spying.In plain lingo, Justice Rehnquist had committed a fraud upon his own court.
In 1986, he was appointed Chief Justice of the U.S. Supreme Court, requiring him to be again before a U.S. Senate ratifying committee. He sought to conceal his role, before becoming a federal official, that he was a lawyer in the Southwest. Witnesses we re available to prove that there were a line of blacks and latinos, waiting to register to vote. Rehnquist assaulted and harassed them, stating in so many words, "Hey, get out of here. You have no right to vote!"
In his book, "The Myth of Democracy", Ferdinand Lundberg set forth the true basis for the supposed de-segregation decision of the high court in 1954, Brown vs. Board of Education. Namely, that at the time in Africa, British and French colonies were breaking away from the mother country to become independent nations run by blacks.
American foreign policy in Africa was being ridiculed and discredited by actions within the U.S. by hundreds of years of mistreatment of blacks in America. Such as the continuing lynching of blacks, by hanging them from trees, while whites nearby were amused as they sat watching and eating their picnic lunch. Lundberg in his classic book of 1968, "The Rich and the Super-Rich", pointed out that the very wealthy are some of the most stupid persons in the world and continue to abuse and beat down common people until one day, there is a revolution where the heads of the rulers and top clergy are chopped off.
According to witnesses, just as the results of the year 2000 Presidential Election were coming in, Chief Justice William Rehnquist and Associate Justice Sandra Day O'Connor, were heard each separately commenting that if Albert Gore, Jr., were to become President, that they could not carry out their plan, based on their advanced age and suffering from illinesses, to retire from the high court.
Justice Clarence Thomas' wife was a key figure in a group operating with GOP money to promote Bush. Justice Antonin Scalia's son was the lawyer participating with presenting the litigation to the high court, Bush versus Gore. These plus one other, made up the Military-Style Junta, called by some "The Gang of Five" that installed George W. Bush as the occupant and resident of the White House. Recall the details of comparisons between the 1876 corrupt installation of Hayes as the occupant and resident o f the White House and that of George W. Bush. Both, revolved in part on corruption of Congress, the U.S. Supreme Court, and finagling with the election authorities in Florida. [For more details, visit our website stories about the 2000 President Electio n.]
To meet a deadline in December, 2000, the high court released their arbitrary ruling just before midnight. Justice Scalia scornfully announced that Americans did NOT have the right to vote for President, only the very limited right to vote for Electors, that antiquated appendage called the Electoral College (that became the basis for the corruption in Florida, and the bribery of top DEMOCRATS in southern Florida to stop the recount of the Gore ballots).
Acknowledging the arbitrary nature of the Bush vs Gore ruling, the Gang of Five put in their decision that it was NOT to be used as a precedent in any other election case or similar controversy. Thus, they admitted it was tainted, and should not be use d, as is otherwise customary, in some other litigation as a prior binding precedent decision.
Justice Antonin Scalia and two Chicago federal appeals judges, were together law professors at Rockefeller's University of Chicago Law School. [That is 7th Circuit appeals judges Richard A. Posner (312) 435-5806 and his shadow and side-kick, Frank H. Ea sterbrook (312) 435-5808 ]. A third Judge on the 7th Circuit federal appeals court is Judge Diane P. Wood (312) 435-5521. She was Dean of the Law School. Together these four judges, while on the bench, also represent the multi-billion dollar stock and b ond portfolio of Rockefeller's University of Chicago.
These four judges are required to file an annual mandatory federal judicial financial disclosure form. They did NOT disclose their financial links, as required, to the Rockefellers.. Further, these forms require their signatures making them liable to fe deral criminal prosecution for perjury if they falsified or omitted any required details.And they did so omit and falsify.
So three federal appeals judges, one step below the high court, and their crony on the high court, have committed a fraud upon their own court. Also, they have committed a fraud upon the American common people and committed blatant injustices against th em. How many ordinary litigants were rejected by these judges in fronting for the Rockefellers and depriving Americans of Equal Justice under Law? These judges have failed to disqualify themselves in numerous cas es involving the financial ownership and interests of the Rockefellers.
So, Americans are being plundered by the scoundrels over the years occupying the U.S. Supreme Court. In violation of the social compact underlying our organic law, namely the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights, we are NOT governed by rulers with o ur consent. The high court judges are not for the common people, but represent the interests and mandates of The Establishment, "the powers that be", the Ruling Class, in others words THEM. The failure to prosecute such Judges for high crimes or to remove them from office by impeachment trial, convinces some commentators that the U.S. Constitution and the Bill of Rights are a dead letter.

More coming....Stay tuned..

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar35.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 34

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 34
by Sherman H. Skolnick 6/2/03

THE SPIRAL STAIRCASE TO REVOLUTION

Most ordinary Americans grow up with their viewpoints of their world shaped, from childhood, by the oil-soaked, spy-riddled, war-mongering monopoly press.
[1] EDUCATION- High School. Their school textbooks, whether in public or parochial school, are put together and published on behalf of the Establishment, "the powers that be", the Ruling Class, the Ultra-Rich, whatever you call THEM. That is, by the Ari stocracy, those unseen, mostly unpublicized, mostly unphotographed persons who govern us without the consent of the governed. They violate the Social Compact that underlies our organic law, the U.S. Constitution. Seldom mentioned, is that the Bill of Ri ghts were made necessary to add to the Constitution, to make the Constitution acceptable. Minus the Bill of Rights, the U.S. Constitution, in the view of some, is a more ordinary plan for parliamentary government.
Who notices? The Bill of Rights, in most every Amendment in the beginning, has the word NO in it. A chain upon the central government. The State constitutions, on the other hand, basically support and grant rights, and state privileges and immunities.
So, high school and middle school students' understanding of history, geography,science, mathematics---all are molded and dispensed to squeeze the young into mainstream viewpoints.
Every war in the history of the nation is inevitably, in these textbooks, described as being about the common people and their sons and daughters supposedly fighting for "freedom". This being so, even if ordinary Americans were sent off to fight a war o n the other side of an ocean, at a time in history when the oceans protected us from Europe's quarrrels. We do not accept George Washingtion's Farewell Address wisely warning us to avoid foreign entanglements.
Someone in a high school in an upscale suburban neighborhood once invited me to lecture to a group of students gathered from five classrooms. Among other things, I set forth details about the generally unmentioned history of judicial corruption, the ven ality of the Bench and the Bar and the newsfakers. And also how we Americans were suckered by the British, through monstrous lies in the captive press, to get involved in their forever-wars in Continental Europe, such as World War One.
I told the students about a huge passenger ship that was actually a secret armaments carrier and the pre-arranged sinking of the ship, in 1915, was a road to embroiling America into Europe's endless wars.
In 1916, President Woodrow Wilson ran for re-election as a supposed "peace candidate", actually a shill for the war-profiteers. In those years, presidential Inaugurals were in March. Just a few weeks after being inaugurated this supposed Peace Candidat e, in April, 1917, began to send by a draft, thousands of young Americans to be poison gassed and wounded or slaughtered in Europe's war. The war was advance planned by the formation, in 1912, of an unconstitutional PRIVATE central bank, the Federal Res erve, masquerading as a "U.S. Government" entity. The purpose was to suck the treasure out of the U.S. to support Great Britain, starting in 1914. England did not have their own money for the weapons they needed and used.
During the question and answer period after my speech to the students, I dared address my own question to a very handsome teacher there, who I understood was a favorite at the school.
"Sir, do you tell your students, who evidently like you a lot---do you tell them how Americans were tricked into getting involved later in Europe's war by the pre-arranged sinking in 1915 of the huge passenger ship, the 'Lusitania'?"
With all the students turning to look at him, he stood up and responded, "It is not in the textbook, not part of the curriculum." So I added, "Can you point to something I said that was a lie?"
His face starting to get red, he answered, "I believe you are telling the truth, but I am not permitted to go into such things and keep my job." Most all the students kept waiting, perhaps for him to finally call me a liar. He repeated, "What you say is true."
A student, changing the subject, stood up and hollared at me, "My father is a lawyer. Tell me, who arranged for you to come here and us big lies, slandering judges and lawyers? My dad told me that you are just a big liar."
This occurred ten years after I as the head of our court-reform group set off, in 1969, the biggest judicial bribery scandal in U.S. history, causing the downfall of Illinois' highest tribunal, the Illinois Supreme Court. (By 2001, the scandal became b elatedly a subject of a book, "Illinois Justice", by Kenneth A. Manaster. The cover of the book and a brief description is on our website homepage.)
[The "Lusitania" pre-arranged sinking, causing the slaughter of most of the passengers, many Americans, became the subject of a book "Lusitania", by Colin Simpson.]
The day after my high school speech, my listed phone rang repeatedly. The callers were all parents of the students, shouting at me, "My children came home from school crying what you did to their teacher. Who the Hell are you, anyway, promoting big lies . You upset the children and their favorite teacher, with such nonsense. The nerve of you, telling the kids the bench and the bar are corrupt." Most did not wish to hear any explanations from me.
[2] EDUCATION. Colleges and Universities. The mass media brainwash young people. That they have to go to college to succeed; at least that is what young people are told. So students figure a college diploma is a "meal ticket", the open door to a high-pa ying job.
On radio talk shows I dare say, "It costs about 33 thousand dollars tuition per year to go to a fancy university. And that is plus a car and other expenses. In a bad downturn in business, can a graduate hope to be assured of making WAGES of 33 thousand dollars per year?" And, who bothers to point out, that most of enterprising, creative people did NOT go to, or graduate from, a university? That is, the progressive people who sometimes spend their lifetimes seeking, by their new ideas, to uplift their fellow humans.
[3] CLASS STRUCTURE. Because of a brainwashing system of higher and lower education, most ordinary Americans, unlike Europeans, are almost completely blank when it comes to understanding CLASS. Notice these excerpts
"...a lower class, consisting of at least nine-tenths of the population, supports an upper, ruling class consisting of several interlocking groups. These ruling groups are a governing bureaucracy of scribes and priests associated with army leaders, land lords, and moneylenders. Such an upper class accumulated great quantities of wealth as taxes, rents, interest on loans, fees for services, or simply financial extortions."
Could this become, more and more, a cynical description of the U.S.? It was actually about Latin America, written by a Georgetown University Professor, a near-insider, very well-informed on the Aristocracy, Carroll Quigley, author of "Tragedy and Hope- --A History of the World in Our Time". Published in 1966, it was suppressed and kept out of circulation for decades thereafter. The excerpt is from page 1115.
Funny thing. Non-progressive U.S. politicians like to shoot-down the ideas of opponents, by saying, "Let's not have any class warfare talk here." Really?
The supposed existence of a middle-income group, an in-between entity, is mis-named as the "Middle Class". Why? Because, if they do indeed exist. they are becoming a phantom. This middle group often despise the poor and stupidly in times of general pros perity seek to emulate the Ultra Rich. The middle group are, step by step, being crushed and made extinct, by the realities of law and finance.
Popular wisdom falsely promotes the view that "revolutions" are made by the poor, the often illiterate, poorly educated (mostly on purpose by the Ultra Rich), sometimes sullen, low-income people. Yet, these folks are smart to the extent that they are su rvivors, knowing how to keep going even in bad times on little income.
It is not mentioned often enough, if at all, that cutting off the dreams and aspirations of the so-called "middle class" or middle income types, inevitably leads to revolution. Better educated than most, they have some ideas where the super rich operate and reside.
On the other hand, a very well-informed, outspoken lawyer, Shelly Waxman, J.D., wrote a book called "In the Teeth of the Wind A Study of Power and How to Fight It". (The book is available through the website www.thelawyer.info) [He has been several tim es a guest on our public access Cable TV Program in Chicago].
He tells of the eight stages of Revolution (which he details,page 260-264), on page 261
"Grumbling. Muttering in discontent. Fomentation. Promotion of the growth or development of. Fomentation. Movement to action; stirring on; spurring on. Rebellion. Implies an open formidable resistance that is often unsuccessful. Uprising. Implies a brief, limited and oten immediately ineffective rebellion. Insurgency. The quality or state of being insurgent, specifically a condition of revolt against a government that is less than an organized revolution and that is not recognized as belligerency. Revolt. To renounce allegiance or subjection (as to a government). Revolution. Applies to a successful rebellion resulting in a major change (as in government)."
[4] FEDERAL RESERVE. As of the date of this article, some go into the unthinkable thought. Namely, that the U.S. Treasury, with their unlawful agent collecting interest on government paper; namely, being the PRIVATE central bank calling itself with a go vernment-sounding name, Federal Reserve, may renounce the out-of-control debt, by defaulting or otherwise repudiating U.S. Treasury Bills, Notes, and Bond. These Treasury securities for which the Fed is unconstitutional agent, have been issued from tim e to time more or less At Par, meaning, a hundred dollars for a hundred dollars face value. They fluctuate up and down after issuance, so that the yield on the market is the current interest rate.
In the near collapse in 1980-1981, of U.S. Treasury paper, the price of some issues of Treasury securities, because of acts by the Fed, sold for as little as 75 cents on the dollar and yielded 16-1/2 per cent.[Our website series "Sucker Traps" goes into the matter of U.S. Treasury securities.]
One of the main purposes, if not the actual primary purpose, of the Federal Reserve ordering interest rates up, is to prevent the hemorrhaging out of this country of so-called U.S. paper money. Interest rates currently being at a near-historic low, rais ing the interest rates would cause a widespread real estate collapse. This being so, since real estate is one of the few, unregulated free markets in the U.S. Particularly vulnerable are ARMs (Adjustable Rate Mortgages). Currently, reportedly threatenin g each other is Federal Reserve Commissar Alan Greenspan and George W. Bush, currently the occupant and resident of the White House (installed by a military-style five-person Junta of the U.S. Supreme Court). To protect the so-called "U.S. Dollar", Gre enspan wants to raise the interest rates. Bush says NO. A "black bag" team (secret break and entry) ransacked Greenspan's residence, looking for secret documents, January 16, 2003. (See, prior part of this website series, as to th! at.) Bush reportedly sought to intimidate Greenspan.
[5] EMPLOYMENT. The Aristocracy, to profit themselves, perhaps to create a basis for a failing, failed Revolution to aid their control, is in the process of forcing down the wages of Americans. Good-wage jobs in the U.S. are terminated and the work sent to be processed by slave-labor level wages in Mexico, Sri Lanka, India, Red China, Honduras, and elsewhere.
Like the proverbial frog sitting in the water not moving as it gets hotter and hotter to the frog's demise, the common Americans grumble but take no effective action YET.
[6] Some of those who seem to criticize the government, are reportedly paid stooges for the American CIA through funds funneled from the spy machine through Foundations. [Scroll all the way down our website to a story about this. Also, there has been o n other websites, such as www.rense.com, a multi-part series on the a little publicized administrative-type almost-secret court in a procedure called Workmens' Compensation. Were a jury trial permitted from the beginning as in other suits for damag
[7] BANKRUPTCY COURT. The Aristocracy is in the process of discarding laws that allow Americans, much unlike Europeans, to get a fresh start after illness, business reverses, and such. That is, in the past, discharging debts through Bankruptcy Court. Th at Court system needs a whole series of articles by us, to outline the fraudulent system, even such as it is currently. So that common Americans, for example, are pushed into Chapter 13, where their properties are plundered instead of saved, by way of t he corrupt "Bankruptcy Club", made up of a few handfuls of crooked judges, lawyers, and court clerks, primarily in big cities, like Chicago, Los Angeles, San Francisco, and such.
[8] WORKERS RIGHTS, blocked. Who bothers to widely comment on the fact that in most states, the rights of workers are being blocked? That is, if a worker is injured on the job, in most states, the worker IS FORBIDDEN to directly sue the employer. Inste ad, the worker is forced to submit his or her claim to a little publicized administrative-type almost-secret court in a procedure called Workmens' Compensation. Were a jury trial permitted from the beginning as in other suits for damage claims, the work er might get a hefty award. But under the Workmens' Compensation laws, the worker most often get a pittance. Yes, the worker has a right to a later, cumbersome appeal to the regular court system which often rejects any appeal remedy with little formalit y.
So, who says workers have equal rights? Corporations, on the other hand, submit THEIR claims against workers to Banker-Judges, heavily favoring the corporate interests.
[9] REVOLUTION that is designed to fail? Who wants that? Obviously the Aristocracy. Seldom if ever mentioned there has been no genuine revolution in what is now called the United States of America, or whatever led up to the same. The so-called American Revolutionary War is wrongly-named. It was merely the American business interests sore at the London government about collecting taxes.
In the 1930s, a charming, patrician President, Franklin Delano Roosevelt, was falsely described by the media fakers as a traitor to his class. In truth, he was the greatest counter-revolutionary in American history. Because of widespread hardships in th e Great Depression, America was at the point of Revolution. At that time, however, there was a large number of foreign born---if they had to sleep under bridges when it rains, they preferred to do so in America, not in Europe. By giving a very few benef its to the unemployed, Roosevelt, to aid the Aristocracy, headed off a possibly real revolution. His declaration in 1933 of a Bank Holiday, saved the huge money center bankers while swallowing up the numerous local community banks.
Do we dare say that we are headed for a Revolution? See if you understand that, in view of the earlier parts of this series. Do the British seek to destroy our central government, reverting us to be subjects of a British (actually German) Monarchy, inst ead of being citizens of the American Republic?

More coming....Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar34.html

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC", Part 33

"THE OVERTHROW OF THE AMERICAN REPUBLIC",
Part 33
by Sherman H. Skolnick 5/6/03

SADDAM HUSSEIN and THE EXIT MONEY
The Persian Gulf War Two ended before the actual shooting started. On March 17, 2003, George W. Bush, the occupant and resident of the White House, proclaimed a 48-hour deadline in which the Iraqi strongman, Saddam Hussein, should turn over Weapons of Mass Destruction and he should leave the country.
As of this date, no WMD have been discovered to exist in Iraq. By the time the shooting started, March 20, 2003, Saddam, according to very knowledgeable sources, had already left the country. The exit was arranged by the Moscow government, with the kno wledge if not the aid of the Paris government, and with the full knowledge and connivance of British Prime Minister Tony Blair and George W. Bush, as supervised by Daddy Bush. Just as the deadline passed on Wednesday, March 19, 20 03, the American CIA with the U.S. Military brass covered up these and other events herein described, by a much trumpeted effort to supposedly assassinate Saddam in Baghdad, using bunker-busting weapons. It was a treasonous fraud, calculated to distract common Americans addicted, like druggies, to the oil-soaked, spy-riddled monopoly press, to cover up the true nature of what was really happening. According to the best, most well-informed sources, who have in the past been accurate, here is what alrea dy had occurred prior to the March 19, 2003, White House deadline:
[1] Tens of millions of dollars had been promised by the American CIA and the Bush White House, to the top generals of Iraq. The contacts with the Iraqi military brass had been started a s long ago as October, 2002, or even before. Part of the pay-offs were already deposited in secret accounts. The plan, agreed upon by all concerned, was to have the major Iraqi military units permit the U.S. Military to quickly ta! ke Baghdad, supposedly with a minimum of U.S. casualties. [A heavily-censored, watered down story about the pay-offs "U.S. Bribed Iraqi Military Leaders", The Express, London, UK, 4/18/3.]The opposition to the overwhelmingly superior U.S. fire-power was to be by misled, poorly-informed, poorly-organized local Iraqi bands of shooters, what Americans in a U.S. context would call "patriots" or "militia". These highly nationalistic minded would-be "troops", mostly not even in uniforms, without good clothe s or shoes, were mowed down by the heavily-armed Americans, killing the Iraqis often twenty or more at a time. The Iraqis, some as conscripts, fought, as best they could, as any patriotic citizen of a nation would against foreign invaders attacking thei r homeland without provocation. History may well describe it as the great slaughter of the innocents.
[2] The bought-off Iraqi generals and other top military officers, and their wives and families, were shortly after the shootin! g started, flown out of Iraqi in U.S. military helicopters. They have been quietly and secretly re-located in the U.S., just as a similar series of events after Persian Gulf War One. In prior exclusive stories, we told about the four thousand or more Ir aqi military intelligence and other military officers as supposed "defectors" quietly re-located' after Persian Gulf War One, to the U.S. The Elder Bush, then president, and perpetuated later by Bush crony Clinton as President, jointly knew that some of these supposed POWs were "double agents". Some two thousand such Iraqis, and their wives and children, were set up in Oklahoma City, their housing, food, clothing, and such, paid for by the Elder Bush/Clinton administrations and perpetuated by George W. Bush. "We're rolling out the welcome wagon to prisoners of war, yet our own veterans who fought there are having trouble getting any help", said Congressman Clifford Steans (R., Florida). Said U.S. Senator John Warner (R., Va.)!
"I find it unconscionable that an Iraqi combatant soldier would be admitted into this country under refugee status and be given certain privileges and benefits and indeed a job at a time when many, many U.S. veterans...cannot or have not been able to get comparable benefits.""FINAL REPORT On the Bombing of the Alfred P. Murrah Federal Building April 19, 1995" , by the Oklahoma Bombing Investigation Committee, published 2001, pages 476-477. Some two thousand of these Iraqi officers have been housed i n Oklahoma City. The chief defense counsel, Stephen Jones, in an unpublicized higher court petition on behalf of defendant Timothy McVeigh, contended that U.S. dissidents, whether they knew it completely or not, were domestic surrogates for a secret Ir aqi operation to get revenge on the U.S. for the Persian Gulf War One. Attorney Jones' 185 page court filing, amazingly, referred to both the public and SECRET McVeigh court record. [Visit, for example, our website series of stori! es on McVeigh.]
[3] The wire service, United Press International, owned wholly or in part by the American CIA, suddenly ran a story, 4/10/3, "Saddam Key in Early CIA Plot", telling how Saddam as a young man became part of a CIA-assassination squad to sn uff out Iraqi leaders, paving the way for Saddam as dictator. Hey! Why did the CIA suddenly, at this late date, tell us this, through their puppet wire service fakers?
In 1916, with the downfall of the Turkish Ottoman Empire, the victorious British to ok over Mesopotamia as a protectorate. In so doing they more or less tried to weld together three countries, as Iraq, made up of warring tribes, religions, and groups. By the 1930s, recognizing failure, the Brits dumped Iraq. During World War Two, oil-r ich Iraq and Iran were both pro-Hitler monarchist types, an inviting target for the Nazis to try to over-run Cairo and seize the Mid-East. After the war, a sizeable political party was the Communist Party of Iraq. To combat them ! and assassinate pro-Moscow Reds, was the purpose of the American CIA and the Ba'ath political party and the installation of dictator Saddam who kept the warring factions within Iraq together as one nation, using savagery and the iron fist against dissid ents.
[4] In the 1980s, Daddy Bush and Saddam Hussein were private business partners, sharing billions and billions of dollars from shaking down the weak, oil-soaked sheikdoms of the Gulf. The foreign bank records showing this became the subject of an p ublicized suit in the Federal Courts in Chicago. I was the only journalist attending the hearing and writing an exclusive story about it. [Visit our website story, "The Secrets of Timothy McVeigh".] This vast extortion horde became the secret subject of a U.S. Treasury Internal Affairs unit inquiry examining the 25 secret worldwide accounts of the Bush Crime Family, jointly held loot with Saddam Hussein. For example, the Bushies had a One Hundred Billion Dollar joint account wit! h the Queen of England, at her private bank, Coutts Bank London. These transactions were done with the aid of Federal Reserve Commissar Alan Greenspan, using his secret authorization code. The authenticated documents and the details are in our website s eries "Greenspan Aids and Bribes Bush". Prior to the actual shooting "war" starting March 20, 2003, billions and billions of dollars of these Bush/Saddam extortion loot were transferred through the Royal Bank of Jordan in part to the Central Bank of Ira q. [The Kingdom of Jordan has been a recipient of huge funds for more than 40 years from the American CIA. The Royal Bank of Jordan is a form of reputed CIA proprietary. See our website story, "Overthrow", Kingdom of Jordan Link, part Part 25.]
On May 6 , 2003, the New York Times ran a heavily-censored, watered down story how upwards of one billion dollars of this was extracted by Saddam's son just before the shooting started. The New York Times did not bother to remind themselve! s of their earlier story about the possibility of huge amounts of U.S. paper currency, found in Iraq, might be counterfeit. [Visit other parts of this series as to the superior quality counterfeit U.S. money.] [5] It should come as no surprise to those who are well-informed and NOT naive, that Saddm has been playing dirty games, against his own people, for the benefit of the American CIA while Saddam was/is supposedly "an enemy". Saddam, prior to the shooting started in Persian Gulf War Two, reportedl y ended up in Switzerland, to have his face changed by expert plastic surgeons. From there, he was transported to Paris where the French CIA can use him, if they see fit, to blackmail the Bush White House to get a piece of the post-Iraq War oil treasure and re-construction. After all, Saddam is an eyewitness whose direct testimony could put Daddy Bush and Bush, Jr., in prison and/or public ridicule, as war criminals, as having invaded another nation without legal or U.S. Consttu! tion basis. The leaked out Bush Crime Family worldwide secret accounts are, in part, by way of Saddam's half-brother in Switzerland. The Bush Crime Family, in transferring just a small part of this loot for the exile of Saddam, are keeping Saddam from h is "proper" portion that he would be "entitled to" as a private business partner of Daddy Bush in shake-down and extortion. Cynical lawyers might point out, however, that a falling out of thieves cannot be a subject of a court partnership damage suit, since under American law it would be "against public policy", sort of like a bank robber caught by a policeman, sueing for "brutality".
6] Some items, some summarized, that have to be considered ===Supervised by Daddy Bush, George W. Bush has committe d treason against the American people, which is becoming more and more known by those overseas.===There was no basis in international law, United Nations rules, or the U.S. Constitution, for the attack on Iraq, there being, appare! ntly no WMD and Saddam Hussein had already gone into exile.===The so-called "war", was a fraud and a sham. Unfortunately, the American newsfakers are concealing that U.S. casualties in the conflict were much, much greater than the monopoly press announc es. Some estimate that upwards of 800 Americans perished---U.S. military, American CIA clandestine, out-of-uniform types, Special Forces, and other Special American operatives---and as many as five thousand of the same wounded.===The Iraqi oil treasure, second largest in the world, is to be used, as collateral, to support U.S. out-of-control debt, to aid Bush in seeking to give a huge tax cut to the very wealthy. An additional purpose, if not the actual main one, is that the Iraqi oil treasure is to h ead-off (maybe actually impossible to sidestep), the downfall of the "U.S. Dollar" and the looming possible default of U.S. Treasury securities, 40 per cent of which currently are owned by the Japanese and the Saudi Royal Family (! both since 1973, having THEIR U.S. Treasury paper backed by U.S. Gold, not so for ordinary Americans).===Is some of the billions turned over to Saddam by the Bush Crime Family, proceeds of their joint extortion loot, actually superior quality counterfe it U.S. paper money? [Visit earlier parts of this series for related items.] Is Saddam, savvy about this, in the process of dumping this phoney baloney money BACK onto the U.S., aiding the British in their long-time plans to destroy the U.S. Central Gov ernment? [Read this website series from Part One to present.]
More coming....Stay tuned.

http://www.skolnicksreport.com/ootar33.html