Monday, December 30, 2013

Six JFK Shooters, Three Tied To CIA, Named–Oswald not among them

 | 

Six JFK Shooters, Three Tied To CIA, Named–Oswald not among them

by Sherwood Ross (with Jim Fetzer)


123 The four hits to JFKSix shooters who participated in the assassination of President John F. Kennedy, including three with ties to the Central Intelligence Agency (CIA), were named by a prominent critic of the Warren Commission Report (WCR).  Remarkably, Lee Harvey Oswald, the Warren Commission’s lone-assassin-designate, was not among them.
During an interview published this past Nov. 20th in The Santa Barbara Independent, WCR critic/researcher Dr. James Fetzer of Madison, WI, and Chairman of the Oswald Innocence Campaign, revealed the names of five of those who appear to have been shooters, where he has identified the sixth separately:
(1) The first shot that hit, which struck Kennedy in the back, appears to have been fired from the top of the County Records Building by Dallas Deputy Sheriff Harry Weatherford. He used a 30.06 to fire a Mannlicher-Carcano (MC) bullet fitted with a plastic collar known as a sabot, which hit JFK 5.5″ below the shoulder just to the right of the spinal column. This was a shallow wound with no point of exit.

(2) Jack Lawrence, a U.S. Air Force expert, who had gone to work for the automobile dealership that provided vehicles for the presidential motorcade just a few days before the assassination, fired the shot that passed through the windshield and struck JFK in the throat from the south end of the Triple Underpass.

(3) Nestor “Tony” Izquierdo, an anti-Castro Cuban recruited by the CIA, fired the shot that hit JFK in the back of the head after the limousine was brought to a halt. He fired three shots with two misses using a Mannlicher-Carcano, which were the only unsilenced shots fired, from the Dal-Tex Building, which housed a uranium mining corporation, Dallas Uranium and Oil, that was a CIA front.

(4) Roscoe White, a Dallas police officer with ties to the CIA, fired from the grassy knoll adjoining the motorcade route, but seems to have “pulled his shot,” Fetzer said, “because it would have hit Jackie, so his shot went into the grass.”  His son subsequently discovered his diary, but gave it to the FBI and it has not been seen since.

(5) Malcolm “Mac” Wallace, who shot from the Dallas Book Depository, may have murdered a dozen people for Lyndon B. Johnson. “Mac” appears to have fired from the west side of the book depository at Texas Governor John Connally in the mistaken belief he was Sen. Ralph Yarborough, whom LBJ despised. Wallace’s fingerprint was found on one of the boxes in the “assassin’s lair” in the book depository from which Oswald allegedly fired.

(6) Frank Sturgis, later complicit in the Watergate robbery, who also appears to have been connected to the CIA, is said by Fetzer to have fired from the north end of the Triple Underpass the shot that entered Kennedy’s right temple. Sturgis is known to have ties to Meyer Lansky, a notorious crime syndicate kingpin, and confessed his role to a New York City Gold Shield Detective when he was arrested attempting to kill Marita Lorenz.

In his interview with the Santa Barbara “Independent,” Fetzer said “there were shooters at six different locations,” with a total of up to 10 shots fired, three of which missed. He asserted JFK was hit four different times: in the back from behind, in the throat from in front, and twice in the head after the driver had brought the car to a halt to make sure he would be killed. Another shot missed and injured bystander James Tague, while “one or more shots hit Connally.”

By contrast, the Warren Commission concluded that a single bullet struck Kennedy in the back, exited through his throat and then wounded Connelly. Fetzer explained that the “magic bullet” theory propounded by the Warren Commission is not only false but provably false and not even anatomically possible, because cervical vertebrae intervene.
Ruth Paine, who appears to have been working for the CIA, arranged for Oswald to go to work for at book depository “just weeks before the assassination, which was part of the whole project to set him up as a patsy,” Fetzer said. Right up to the time of the assassination, Oswald was a paid FBI informant, collecting $200 a month, which explains why his W-2 forms have never been released by the government.
As for the motivation to kill JFK, Fetzer noted that he was threatening to shatter the CIA into a thousand pieces, that the Joint Chiefs believed he was soft on communism, that the Mafia was unhappy because Attorney General Robert Kennedy was cracking down on organized crime, that he was going to abolish the FED and cut the oil depletion allowance.
Fetzer said Vice President Johnson, who had forced his way onto the ticket with JFK in Los Angeles in order to succeed him when he would be taken out, “was a pivotal player” facilitating the assassination. LBJ sent his chief administrative assistant, Cliff Carter, down to Dallas to make sure all the arrangements for the assassination were in place.  And his close friend, J. Edgar Hoover, used the FBI to cover it up.
Fetzer said further there where “more than 15 indications of Secret Service complicity in setting Kennedy up for the hit”: two agents assigned to the President’s limousine were left behind at Love Field; that JFK’s limousine, which should have been in the middle of the motorcade, was put first; that the motorcycle escort was reduced to four and instructed not to ride ahead of the limousine’s rear wheels; and after the first shots were fired, the driver pulled the limo to the left and stopped.
What’s more, Fetzer produced an AP photograph that appears to show Oswald standing in doorway of the book depository at the time JFK was shot. They may be compared with Oswald’s photograph taken later that afternoon in Dallas police headquarters. When questioned, Oswald told Dallas homicide detective Will Fritz that during the shooting he had been standing with Bill Shelley, one of his supervisors, in front of the building.

Note the missing left shoulder and the figure who is in front of and behind the man in the doorway at the same time, which are obvious indications the photo has been altered.  Facial features have been distorted, but the clothing is the key. “If you look at the height, weight, build, and the clothing he’s wearing—especially the highly unusual shirt and the t-shirt he has on—they correspond very closely to what Oswald was wearing when he was arrested,” Fetzer said.
For more proof that the man in the doorway (Doorman) was Lee Oswald, visit the Oswald Innocence Campaignon-line. While they altered features of Doorman’s face, the only other candidates for having been there were not wearing comparable clothing or did not fit the height, weight and build of the man in the doorway.  When you consider the totality of the evidence, no alternative explanation is reasonable.
In his Santa Barbara Independent interview, Fetzer said public opinion polls “have shown over the years that as much as 85 percent of the public has expressed disagreement with the Warren Commission and the lone assassin theory.” Fetzer elaborated on the points he made in great detail during his keynote address, “The Assassination of America”, for the Santa Barbara JFK conference that he organized and moderated, which is now available at jfk50santabarbara.com.
Fetzer is a former Marine Corps officer who earned his Ph.D. in the history and philosophy of science.  He has published 29 books, including three collections of studies by experts on different aspects of the assassination. Distinguished McKnight University Professor Emeritus at the University of Minnesota Duluth, he is also an editor for, and contributor to, Veterans Today.
Sherwood Ross is an award-winning reporter. He served in the U.S Air Force where he contributed to his base newspaper. He later worked for The Miami Herald and Chicago Daily News. He contributed a weekly column on working for a major wire service. He is also an editorial and book publicist. He currently resides in Florida.
Bookmark and Share

Related Posts:

Short URL: http://www.veteranstoday.com/?p=282404

EPA Shuts Down Last Lead Smelter

Back Door Gun Control

EPA Shuts Down Last Lead Smelter
There are numerous alarming reasons why the US government and the military
have been buying up all the ammo. Here's one of them.
Obama and the EPA just shut down the last lead smelting plant in the US.

They raised the EPA regulations by 10 fold and it would have cost the plant
$100 million to comply. You can own all the guns you want, but if you can't
get ammo, you are out of luck.

Remember when Obama promised his minions that he was working on gun control
behind the scenes? Welcome to it. Now, all domestic mined lead ore will have
to be shipped overseas, refined and then shipped back to the US. Not only
will ammo now be even harder to come by, the demand and the process of
supply will cause the price to skyrocket even more.

And ponder this. there is an excellent chance that Obama will rig the market
to where all ammo has to be purchased from a government entity instituting
de facto ammo registration.

So much for the Second Amendment. There has not been a peep about this in
the major news outlets and it is done. With the US no longer producing lead,
all supplies will now have to come from China, Australia or Peru, with the
overwhelming emphasis on China. More redistribution of wealth; more economic
and liberty crippling of the US on tap.

The asshats at the EPA (evil protection agency) had this to say:

The U.S. Environmental Protection Agency said the company "made a business
decision" to shut down the smelter instead of installing pollution control
technologies needed to reduce sulfur dioxide and lead emissions as required
by the Clean Air Act.

The Doe Run Co. announced last year that it had dropped plans to build a new
lead processing facility in Herculaneum that would have used a new, cleaner
lead production technology. The company cited the $100 million project as
too financially risky.

The EPA is playing Mafioso I guess - we didn't make them shut down, they
made a business decision. In other words, they couldn't pay the extortion,
so the thugs shut them down. I'm pretty sure that Americans are getting
ready to make their own business decision regarding the Marxists and I don't
think it will be pleasant. But Marxists will do or die and are doubling down
on the destruction of energy in America, our way of life and the
Constitution.

The smelting plant has known since 2010 this was coming. They couldn't stop
it and no one else rose up to stop it either. The business had been in
production for 120 years and now goes the way of our auto industry.

The military's obsession with ammo was related to security and supply. They
knew this was coming too, so they bought up all they could get before the
plug was pulled. Screw the average American.
It's as Chris Muir said, he's not as worried about where the bullets will
come from, as much as how the government will deliver them and I'm right
there with him on that one.

So, back door gun control is moving forward and while we are all distracted
with shiny stuff, our Second Amendment rights are just about gone. Obama is
one Marxist dictator who is savvy at political chess. He has flanked the
Second Amendment. Now it's our move.

Obama administration announces net loss of at least 5 million Insurance plans

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 
Obama administration announces net loss of at least 5 million Insurance plans
Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 30-Dec-2013 12:10:06

The White House used a Sunday morning statement to admit that only 1.1 million people have used the federal Obamacare website to sign up for the president’s healthcare network by Christmas Day.
News reports and advocacy websites say roughly 1 million people have enrolled with health-benefit companies via state websites, including 400,000 in California and 157,000 in New York, by the Dec. 24 deadline, which allows coverage starting Jan. 1.
The total reported signups are at least 3 million fewer than the 5 million people whose health-insurance policies were cancelled prior to Christmas by President Barack Obama’s ambitious tax-and-healthcare scheme.
The minus-3-million score is only partially offset by the extension of Medicaid coverage to perhaps 2 million other people, few of whom earn enough to afford commercial insurance.
Polls shows that a majority of the public has soured on Obamacare, partly because of Obama’s deceptive promise about the law’s terns. The voters’ negative reaction has hammered Obama’s polls below 40 percent, and is creating splits between the White House and the congressional Democrats who face election races in November 2014.
The plan is also expected to undergo more traumas in the New Year as more Americans react to the increased premiums and higher deductibles caused by Obamacare, by lower access to doctors and hospitals, and threats to the privacy of their data.
Read more: http://dailycaller.com/2013/12/29/obama-administration-announces-net-loss-of-at-least-4-million-insurance-plans/#ixzz2oylKjTCL

An Open Letter to the Makers of The Wolf of Wall Street, and the Wolf Himself!!!

Subject: An Open Letter to the Makers of The Wolf of Wall Street!!! YOU'VE BEEN CONNED!!!
To: Ralph Faulk <charlottehomes@gmail.com>

An Open Letter to the Makers of The Wolf of Wall Street, and the Wolf Himself!!!

By LA Weekly Thu., Dec. 26 2013 at 5:00 AM


MONDAY MORNING INTEL/RUMORS

12-30-2013   Intel/Newshound  Guru Poppy3     THEY CAN SELL BONDS  ALL DAY BUT WITHOUT A RATE THEY ARE  WORTHLESS.  AT  PRESENT THEY HAVE BEEN EXCHANGED FOR FUTURES ON  OIL.  THE BONDS SALES  WILL NOT PRODUCE ANY CASH FLOW WITHOUT A NEW  RATE ON THE DINAR.  I HAVE HEARD  UNCONFIRMED NEWS THAT  THE BONDS WHERE TO BE RATED AT $2.66 SO THAT THEY WOULD  SELL OUT FAST AND RAISE  HUGE CAPITAL FOR IRAQ ECONOMY AND ONCE THE MAJORITY OF  THEM WERE SOLD THEN  THE EXCHANGE RATE WOULD RISE VERY QUICK TO THE NOMINAL  RATE. TIME  WILL  TELL.

12-30-2013   Newshound Guru Bondlady    there seems to be  a frenzy  of things being done to secure Iraq as it edges into the new year, why  now?  why didn't they go all in before now?   Big changes coming thats why and it  requires  stability in every way...as they need to add value to a crushed dinar  but they needed these things to happen first and we're seeing it all come about  every single day!  They are serious and want to show and  portray a NEW IRAQ to  the rest of the world!   [post 2 of  2] [See possible “to do list”  in the DinarGuru resource bar on the  left]

12-30-2013   Newshound Guru Bondlady
   when Shabibi  was  the CBI governor...He said he needed GOI cooperation and all to work  together as  a team and security. So you see them all working or most of them  working for the  same goal here, security and the government has  giving the CBI and Turki their  blessing to move the economy forward per the  dinar!   as Iraq goes into the new  year they will go  international with the World Bank and IMF and WTO support and  help...making the  CBI able to deal in a huge way also in international banking  but they must  kick terror out of Iraq.   [post 1 of 2....stay  tuned]
Read more: http://www.dinarguru.com/#ixzz2oyY7khfI

Visit stage2omega at: http://www.stage2omega.com/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

'Volgograd bombings terror message to Russia's position on Syria'

Check out this video on YouTube:

http://youtu.be/nFyuwMHuhyQ

Hiding Behind The BAR Why Attorneys Are Not Lawyers

Hiding Behind The BAR Why Attorneys Are Not Lawyers

“Within the U.S. Corporation,” they're collectively called everything from "attorney" to "lawyer" to "counselor." Are these terms truly equivalent, or has the identity of one been mistaken for another? 

What exactly is a "Licensed BAR Attorney?" A credential accompanies every legal paper produced by attorneys - along with a “STATE” BAR Certification number. The credential is issued by the boards of law examiners, the applicant having acquired a minimum competency in law. In most cases, the board is an independent, self-financing, separately incorporated group of law professionals, administered by the “state bar association,” a branch of the American Bar Association, functioning in an advisory capacity to the supreme court of each of the “STATE.” Simply stated, they are an advisory board of recommendation to the court. The accreditation number is issued by the “state bar association,” a “professional dues paying union.”

As we are about to show you, an ‘attorney’ is not a ‘lawyer,’ yet the average American improperly interchanges these words as if they represent the same occupation, and the average American attorney unduly accepts the honor to be called "lawyer" when he is not. In order to discern the difference, and where we stand within the current court system, it’s necessary to examine the British origins of our “U.S. courts” and the terminology that has been established from the beginning. It's important to over-stand the proper lawful definitions for the various titles we now give these “corporate court” related occupations.

The legal profession in the U.S. is directly derived from the British system. Even the word "bar" is of British origin: BAR -- A particular portion of a courtroom. Named from the space enclosed by two bars or rails, one of which separated the judge's bench from the rest of the room; the other shut off both the bench and the area for lawyers engaged in trials from the space allotted to suitors, witnesses, and others. Such persons as appeared as speakers (advocates, or counsel) before the court, were said to be "called to the bar", that is, privileged so to appear, speak and otherwise serve in the presence of the judges as "barristers." The corresponding phrase in the United States is "admitted to the bar". - A Dictionary of Law (1893).
From the definition of ‘BAR,’ the title and occupation of a "barrister" is derived:

BARRISTER defined: -- English law. A counselor admitted to plead at the bar. 2. Ouster barrister, is one who pleads ouster or without the bar. 3. Inner barrister, a sergeant or king's counsel who pleads within the bar. 4. Vacation barrister, a counselor newly called to the bar, who is to attend for several long vacations the exercise of the house. 5. Barristers are called apprentices, apprentitii ad legem, being looked upon as learners, and not qualified until they obtain the degree of sergeant. -- Edmund Plowden, the author of the Commentaries, a volume of elaborate reports in the reigns of Edward VI., Mary, Philip and Mary, and Elizabeth, describes himself as an apprentice of the common law. -- A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier (Revised Sixth Edition, 1856).

BARRISTER defined: n. [from BAR.] A counselor, learned in the laws, qualified and admitted to pleas at the bar, and to take upon him the defense of clients; answering to the advocate or licentiate of other countries. Anciently, barristers were called, in England, apprentices of the law. Outer barristers are pleaders without the bar, to distinguish them from inner barristers, benchers or readers, who have been sometime admitted to pleas within the bar, as the King’s Counsel are. -- Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

Overall, a barrister is one who has the privilege to plead at the courtroom bar separating the judicial from the non-judicial spectators. Currently, in U.S. “corporate courts,” the inner bar between the bench (judge) and the outer bar no longer exists, and the outer bar separates the attorneys (not lawyers) from the spectator's gallery. This will be explained more as you read further. As with the word ‘BAR,’ each commonly used word describing the various court officers is derived directly from root words:

1). From the word "solicit" is derived the name and occupation of a ‘solicitor’; one who solicits or petitions an action in a court.

SOLICIT defined: v.t. [Latin - solicito] 1. To ask with some degree of earnestness; to make petition to; to apply to for obtaining something. This word implies earnestness in seeking ... 2. To ask for with some degree of earnestness; to seek by petition; as, to solicit an office; to solicit a favor. -- Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

2). From the word "attorn" is derived the name and occupation of an ‘attorney;’ one who transfers or assigns property, rights, title and allegiance to the owner of the land.

ATTORN defined: v. ME. [Origin French. atorner, aturner >assign, appoint, f. a-torner turn v.] 1. v.t.Turn; change, transform; deck out. 2. v.tTurn over (goods, service, allegiance, etc.) to another; transfer, assign. 3. >v.i. Transfer one’s tenancy, or (arch.) homage or allegiance, to another; formally acknowledge such transfer. attorn tenant (to) Law formally transfer one’s tenancy to), make legal acknowledgement of tenancy ( to a new landlord) -- Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

ATTORN defined: v.i. [Latin ad and torno.] In the feudal law, to turn, or transfer homage and service from one lord to another. This is the act of feudatories, vassels or tenants, upon the alienation of the estate. -- Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ATTORNMENT defined: n. The act of a feudatory, vassal or tenant, by which he consents, upon the alienation of an estate, to receive a new lord or superior, and transfers to him his homage and service. -- Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

ATTORNMENT defined: n. the transference of bailor status, tenancy, or (arch.) allegiance, service, etc., to another; formal acknowledgement of such transfer: lme. -- Oxford English Dictionary 1999.

3).  From the word advocate comes the meaning of the occupation by the same name; one who pleads or defends by argument in a court.

ADVOCATE defined: v.t. [Latin advocatus, from advoco, to call for, to plead for; of ad and voco, to call. See Vocal.] To plead in favor of; to defend by argument, before a tribunal; to support or vindicate. -- Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

4). From the word "counsel" is derived the name and occupation of a ‘counselor’ or ‘lawyer’; one who is learned in the law to give advice in a court of law;

COUNSEL defined: v.t. [Latin. to consult; to ask, to assail.] 1. To give advice or deliberate opinion to another for the government of his conduct; to advise. - Webster's 1828 Dictionary.

LAWYER defined: A counselor; one learned in the law. -- A Law Dictionary by John Bouvier (Revised Sixth Edition, 1856).

Although modern usage tends to group all these descriptive occupational words as the same, the fact is that they have different and distinctive meanings when used within the context of court activities:

Solicitor -- one who petitions (initiates) for another in a court                                      
Counselor -- one who advises another concerning a court matter                                      
Lawyer -- [see counselor] learned in the law to advise in a court                                   
Barrister -- one who is privileged to plead at the bar                                                    
Advocate -- one who pleads within the bar for a defendant                                            
Attorney -- one who transfers or assigns, within the bar, another's rights and property acting on behalf of the ruling crown (government)

It's very clear that an attorney is not a lawyer. The lawyer is a learned counselor who advises. The ruling “corporation” appoints an attorney as one who transfers a tenant's rights, allegiance, and title to the landowner (“corporation”).


How To Make Colloidal Silver at Home in 20 Minutes for Pennies -vid

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

How To Make Colloidal Silver at Home in 20 Minutes for Pennies -vid
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Monday, 30-Dec-2013 10:44:24

.
Colloidal silver is expensive to buy, but you can make it yourself quickly and easily. This is a step-by-step demonstration of how I make CS. When I make a batch, it lasts a long time, so it had been about a year since I last made some.

 New  0  0  0  0

Possible Tools

"Standing" is not Constitutional. It was created in 1922 and is an attempt to stymie,to pervert Justice! We citizens are denied access to the Courts " to petition our government for a redress of grievances". The doctrine is UNCONSTITUTIONAL!!!!!

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Right_to_petition



http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Standing_(law)



The Emoluments clause, U.S. Constitution Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 (art. I, § 9, cl. 8), provides:

No Title of Nobility shall be granted by the United States: And no Person holding any Office of Profit or Trust under them, shall, without the Consent of the Congress, accept of any present, Emolument, Office, or Title, of any kind whatever, from any King, Prince, or foreign State.

No one in America believes with a straight face that AIPAC is not a tool of the Israeli government. Arrest these people for espionage and their followers for treason, now!
I do not wish to sacrifice my family and/ or my country for the Jews. Their religion is false, bloody and evil! The 1st Amendment prohibits any diplomatic contact between ourselves and this most bloody little Theocracy. Follow the law!.

Too Much, Too Soon: How to Avoid Sudden Wealth Syndrome


Irvin G. Schorsch III

Irvin G. Schorsch III

Founder and President of Pennsylvania Capital Management, Inc.
 

Too Much, Too Soon: How to Avoid Sudden Wealth Syndrome

Posted: 07/07/2012 2:42 pm


It is an affliction many long to have. It strikes lottery winners, first-round NBA draft picks, and overnight IPO millionaires alike. Sudden Wealth Syndrome is a term coined by psychologist Stephen Goldbart to describe the stress, guilt, social isolation and confusion that often accompanies a giant windfall. While coming into money ought to be a good thing, it can take a bad turn. Many who find sudden fortune become overwhelmed and start to overspend, grow suspicious of those around them and make poor decisions that lead to familial and financial ruin.
For these reasons, whenever I see a client who has suddenly become wealthy, I insist that we take things slowly and recommend they deposit their newfound wealth in a safe, insured account with an independent custodian or bank. As with any life change, a sudden shift in financial status can be traumatic. Therefore, care should be taken not to rush into any big decisions for at least several months. It's important to take time to process the life change, so that you can have a clear head and make decisions that will serve you well in the long run.
Sudden Wealth Syndrome expert Stephen Goldbart and his associates at the Money, Meaning & Choices Institute say that much like the four stages of grief, there are four stages people go through when coming to terms with their new wealth:
  1. Honeymoon: Like the honeymoon phase of a love relationship, people who first come into money feel powerful and invulnerable. Many go on spending sprees, buying things and making risky investments (often with disastrous results).
  2. Wealth Acceptance: In this stage, the view of oneself as powerful and invincible is mixed with a sense of vulnerability and the realization for the need to set limits.
  3. Identity Consolidation: During this stage, people accept that they are rich, but realize that their money doesn't define them. They begin asking: "Who do I want to be?"
  4. Stewardship: In this phase, people have reached a mature resolution of what their money means to them and have a plan for what to do with it in terms of a personal, familial and philanthropic mission.
The first step the newly wealthy need to take is to find a trusted financial adviser - ̶ and possibly a therapist - ̶ to guide them through these stages and help them avoid the common psychological and financial pitfalls.
I start by discussing their hopes and plans for the future and how this money can create options and facilitate their dreams. Then, we establish a lifestyle expense overview so that they can get see their overall financial picture and compare and align sources of revenue to their expense profile.
Over the course of several sessions, we identify their core values, what they wish to change about their lives as well as the legacies they want to leave for their children and their charities. Based on their vision, goals and values, we draw up a budget that takes into account the cost of maintaining their desired new lifestyle and pursuing their personal and philanthropic endeavors. We test a variety of performance assumptions, interest rates, inflation factors, tax scenarios and time horizons to see how they would collectively affect the nest egg.
The idea of relying on a lump sum of money can cause panic in and of itself. To provide my clients with peace of mind, we draw up a strategy that encourages them to live on the proceeds without touching the principal and set up a system in which money from their custodial, bank or brokerage account is deposited into a checking account each month just like a paycheck. The goal is to smooth out the income flows to complement and support the client's desired lifestyle.
This planning and budgeting process is extremely important as it defines necessary boundaries and provides clients with a sense of structure. Often, once a client sees how much their desired lifestyle or endeavor will cost and how it will be funded, they're better able to adapt to their new financial reality and view the money as tangible and finite. This helps them set priorities that makes it easier for them to say "no" to lavish, frivolous spending or requests for large gifts to friends, relatives or charities that are inconsistent with their budget, vision and values.
Taking this reasoned approach helps the "instantly wealthy" adapt to their new circumstances and get to that desired fourth stage where they become a responsible steward of their wealth. At the same time, clients learn to grow their nest egg and leverage it as a tool to serve themselves, their families and the world at large.

The information in this article is general in nature and may not apply to your own financial situation. Please consult your own professional estate, tax, and/or financial advisor regarding this information and your own personal financial needs. For a complete disclosure statement, please see my biography. Follow Irvin on Twitter @IrvinSchorsch.



Follow Irvin G. Schorsch III on Twitter: www.twitter.com/@IrvinSchorsch 

Travel without TSA theft!

  
If YOU travel with valuables – please watch this:
Picture
100% Fool-Proof Solutions To Secure Personal Items from TSA Theft Published on Jan 8, 2013

Here's a 100% foolproof solution to stop the TSA from stealing your valuables.

Watch as Mike Adams, the Health Ranger, explains how you can fly with gold coins, expensive electronics, cameras and iPads without having any of them stolen by TSA thieves (who routinely steal such items and sell them on eBay).

http://r20.rs6.net/tn.jsp?e=001QY9cXxba_-kCTKjR2BmbsTu4IIntUQx6upH-piHPK2ZKeFEG_o8Il6aRV83Zkke8DlD_plLep-oSQ9m8PYcq5G60WY5vqaLq0miivTwqU7WAIBf6nhxUwCB3es9m5PRn
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LQ9O9HDhgjQ  



CIA/Blackwater Terrorists Nabbed Rocketing Libya, and IDed

Video: (about 8 and a half mins): NASA Admits to Blue Star Kachina! HEO 437

Dear V.K. Durham,  

Is the US government's preparation for a vast, astronomical catastrophe (as long-prophesied by the Native American Hopi Nation from the 
Southwestern US) the reason why the government has become a "Police State," as many of those recently-polled agreed, in a C-SPAN 
post from last night?
This video is a mash-up of History Channel programming with BBC and footage from a recent Chinese rocket launch, with undeniable views of a 
large blue planetoid visible from space. 

 Video: (about 8 and a half mins):



- Alexandra

P.S. Please share Forbidden Knowledge TV e-mails
and videos with your friends and colleagues.

That's how we grow. Thanks.
   
Alexandra Bruce
Forbidden Knowledge TV
Daily Videos from the Edges of Science
http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com