YOUR HIDDEN LEGAL RIGHTS IN THE U.S. CONSTITUTION FROM ERASMUS OF AMERICA - FEB. 3, 2014
"We, the people of the United States," means that the final authority for anything done in the U.S. Constitution comes from the people of America. That is the same position as the American Declaration of Independence of July 4, 1776 stated the same thing that the final authority for all government comes from the people of the nation. That means that members of Congress, heads of federal agencies, occupant in the White House, military officers and military personnel are technically all your servants of the people of America. You are their boss, their master, not their slaves, serfs, owned property, etc. Your authority over the U.S. Constitution is so total used correctly that you can modify the U.S. Constitution by the process called amending the Constitution. You can enforce the U.S. Constitution by valid statute laws and policies set up by Wash., D.C. but they cannot change the terms of authority you the American people granted them by ratification of the U.S. Constitution and amendments which passed due to your ratification of them by the process specified in the U.S. Constitution. You judge that Wash., D.C. has betrayed you by criminal abuse of the claimed powers of authority granted by the U.S. Constitution, you can cancel this claimed national government at any time and set up a new national government to replace it by the listed method of calling for a constitutional convention under the authority of the state governments of America.
Alexander Hamilton who was one of the Fathers of the U.S. Constitution said that the U.S. Constitution did not need a U.S. Bill of Rights as no legal authority was granted to the U.S. Constitution to override your state bill of rights or other legal rights that governmental authority could not take away from you. He gave an example that Article III, Section 3 says that the trial of all crimes, except in cases of impeachment, shall be by jury (your right to trial by jury covered including they cannot take away your money, property, etc. for claimed "criminal" acts except convicted of a criminal act by a trial by jury). I.R.S. seizures of your money, property, etc. without trial by jury is not legal and you can sue them for it if they try! But Alexander Hamilton said that since no legal authority was granted through the U.S. Constitution to cancel or ignore your state bill of rights, when tried in your state as required when the criminal act occurred in your state, the federal court had to obey the authority of your state bill of rights in their federal court or else such federal criminal trial was illegal under the U.S. Constitution and could not be legally held as a federal criminal trial.
Amendment 7 of the U.S. Bill of Rights states that you cannot be sued for more than $20 and it not be held in a court bound by common law. You see that you have to consent to be sued in a non-common law federal court or else in any lawsuit covered by common law, you have the automatic right to be sued by trial by jury or else cannot be sued under federal law. Contracts were created by the standards of common law, property was bought by the standards of common law, your money lawfully obtained was covered as your property that government could not take away from you except by trial by jury where the jury tried you and judged and not the government whether you should be allowed to keep your money, property, keep a contract in force or not, was fraud committed in a contract or not according to common law standards. The jury had to rule against you and the government could not whether you were to be allowed under law to keep or else lose your money, property, enforced contracts, etc. If the federal government does not supply you common law courts for issues covered by common law, then they cannot try you nor take away your money, property, contracts, etc. by authority and force of law. The whole purpose of common law and common law courts was to protect you as a citizen from tyranny under law by the government in power. When your fellow citizens were to judge you who were supposed to be your social peers and likely even knew you in the local community, they might well know you well enough and whether you were honest or dishonest, and could with fairness judge you by the standards of honest justice and not the corrupt psuedo-justice of would-be tyrannies of government.
Amendment 9 and Amendment 10 of the U.S. Bill of Rights says that you possess legal rights not listed in the U.S. Constitution and these legal rights are retained by you even though not listed in the formal U.S. Constitution. These refer to basically your Natural Law or God-given Rights which was the concept of freedom the American Revolution of 1776 was fought over to retain for the American people against any form or type of government on earth.
Article 5 of the U.S. Bill of Rights says any grand jury in America has the legal right of presentment where they can tell the local prosecutor to leave them and they independently investigate such as local or national crimes committed by government for example. If they find governmental officials or employees guilty of criminal acts, they can criminally charge them with articles or counts or presentment instead of indictments and the local sheriff, judge, etc. are supposed to enforce the counts of presentment with legal process of criminal law including arrest, etc. of the criminally charged and bringing them to trial if required.
Article 4 of the U.S. Bill of Rights says that your private records except when court ordered are your private property and only for criminal law reasons can they seek to obtain and see your private records. Under current federal civil rights law, you can civilly sue them and criminally prosecute them if they try to gain access to your private records without justification for believed criminal act. And for credit bureaus, etc. to publicy release your personal records without your legal consent when you are not charged with any crime sounds like serious criminal violation of your personal civil rights under current federal and state civil rights laws. You should be able to sue and prosecute them for criminal violation of your civil rights if you so want to under law!
As the Preamble to the U.S. Bill of Rights says that the 10 U.S. Bill of Rights are superior in legal authority than the rest of the U.S. Constitution so that even the treaty authority in the first part of the U.S. Constitution is inferior in legal authority to the U.S. Bill of Rights, they cannot use the UN, etc. to try and outlaw your ownership of guns, etc. in America and they cannot in name of the UN overthrow any of your other legal rights guaranteed under the U.S. Constitution including right to property, to keep money stored up in accounts for your private use in banks, etc.
When Secretary of State, Thomas Jefferson in a legal memo to President George Washington stated that there was one supreme law which no claimed law in the nation could override in legal authority. We had the God-given right to survival and when threatened, we had the right to even go against our formal man-decreed laws in nations. For example, as total as a treaty obligation of America was in authority, if it threatened the survival of the nation, then the nation could ignore the terms of the treaty while the threat to survival of the American people and nation was at stake. A modern example would be if your wife was going to die if not gotten quickly to the hospital, you have the special crisis right of survival to not wait on all lights as to when you could drive across street intersections, etc. and drive even through red stop lights if required to save her life. You should still practice prudence to not endanger others by not obeying the law in this case, but her right of survival took legal precedence in authority over the formal claimed authority of man normally behind laws on the books.
Article 1, Section 10 of the U.S. Constitution says that state governments should not make anything but gold and silver coin a tender in payment of debts. This was to protect the people of the states from fiat paper money where by printing the currency endlessly without giving it enforced value could ruin the wages of the people by engineered wild inflation of money and ruin the profits of business by engineered wild inflation of money received for profit but worth so much less in purchasing power as to ruin businesses receiving this wildly inflated money created by lack of integrity of the government engineering this monetary swindle of the people and businesses of America.
The states could not pass bill of attainders, pass ex post facto laws, or laws impairing the obligation of contracts, etc.
Bill of attainder
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
"Writ of attainder" redirects here. It is not to be confused with Writ of attaint.
 | This article needs additional citations for verification. Please help improve this article by adding citations to reliable sources. Unsourced material may be challenged and removed. (November 2010) |
A bill of attainder (also known as an act of attainder or writ of attainder) is an act of a legislature declaring a person or group of persons guilty of some crime and punishing them without privilege of a judicial trial. As with attainder resulting from the normal judicial process, the effect of such a bill is to nullify the targeted person’s civil rights, most notably the right to own property (and thus pass it on to heirs), the right to a title of nobility, and, in at least the original usage, the right to life itself. Bills of attainder were used in England between about 1300 and 1800 and resulted in the executions of a number of notable historical figures. However, the use of these bills eventually fell into disfavour due to the obvious potential for abuse and the violation of several legal principles, most importantly separation of powers, the right to due process, and the precept that a law should address a particular form of behaviour rather than a specific individual or group. For these reasons, bills of attainder are expressly banned by the United States Constitution as well as the constitutions of all 50 USstates.
post facto law
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Jump to: navigation, search
It has been suggested that Retroactivity be merged into this article. (Discuss)Proposed since September 2013.
An ex post facto law (Latin for "from after the action" or "after the fact"), also called aretroactive law, is a law that retroactively changes the legal consequences (or status) of actions that were committed, or relationships that existed, before the enactment of the law. In criminal law, it may criminalize actions that were legal when committed; it may aggravate a crime by bringing it into a more severe category than it was in when it was committed; it may change the punishment prescribed for a crime, as by adding new penalties or extending sentences; or it may alter the rules of evidence in order to make conviction for a crime likelier than it would have been when the deed was committed. Conversely, a form of ex post facto law commonly called an amnesty lawmay decriminalize certain acts or alleviate possible punishments (for example by replacing the death sentence with lifelong imprisonment) retroactively. Such laws are also known by the Latin term in mitius.
A law may have an ex post facto effect without being technically ex post facto. For example, when a law repeals a previous law, the repealed legislation is no longer applicable to situations to which it previously was, even if such situations arose before the law was repealed. The principle of prohibiting the continued application of such laws is called Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali, especially in European Continental systems.
Some common-law jurisdictions do not permit retroactive criminal legislation, though new precedent generally applies to events that occurred before the judicial decision.Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3. In some nations that follow the Westminster system of government, such as the United Kingdom, ex post facto laws are technically possible, because the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy allows Parliament to pass any law it wishes. In a nation with an entrenched bill of rights or a written constitution, ex post facto legislation may be prohibited
| It has been suggested that Retroactivity be merged into this article. (Discuss)Proposed since September 2013. |
A law may have an ex post facto effect without being technically ex post facto. For example, when a law repeals a previous law, the repealed legislation is no longer applicable to situations to which it previously was, even if such situations arose before the law was repealed. The principle of prohibiting the continued application of such laws is called Nullum crimen, nulla poena sine praevia lege poenali, especially in European Continental systems.
Some common-law jurisdictions do not permit retroactive criminal legislation, though new precedent generally applies to events that occurred before the judicial decision.Ex post facto laws are expressly forbidden by the United States Constitution in Article 1, Section 9, Clause 3. In some nations that follow the Westminster system of government, such as the United Kingdom, ex post facto laws are technically possible, because the doctrine of parliamentary supremacy allows Parliament to pass any law it wishes. In a nation with an entrenched bill of rights or a written constitution, ex post facto legislation may be prohibited
TTo impair the obligation of contracts James Madison gave examples of in his section of The Federalist Papers. These legal reports were written by those who wrote the U.S. Constitution to be ratified. Madison's examples show what was meant. He said that if you allowed the impairment of obligations of contracts (under English common law retained by America after 1776) , the impairment (regulation) of obligations of contracts would be so massive under government as to make commerce in America nearly impossible and badly hurt the growth and prosperity of the American economy making the economy function nearly impossible. Contracts legal under common law would be still legal in America under the U.S. Constitution. That meant that state and federal government could not regulate nor require registration of stocks and bonds by government in America. What contracts and bonds were valid under common law were still valid under American law after the American Revolution. During the American Revolution, some state governments tried to set up regulation and registration of security offers (stock and bond contract offers) and the Continental Congress fighting the American Revolution told the citizens in states trying this to ignore state claims of legal authority over this issue and go ahead with their business offers as they were exercising their God-given right to contract and to property as were rights which governmental authority could not legally take away from the American people. America had industry already started in America before the end of the American Revolution because the Continental Congress pushed for the establishment of industry in America instead of letting state ego over claims of invalid authority to hold back the establishment and expansion of the American economy even while they were fighting the American Revolution at the same moment.
Alexander Hamilton stood for some things I do not agree with as the suggested best policy for America, but while serving President George Washington, he suggested setting up tariff protections to help grow the textile industries, etc. started in the American Revolution so America would have strong national industries later on due to governmental policy. His tariff policy was carried out and America emerged as a great industrial giant later on due to reasonable tariff protection and the freedom to sell business offers called stocks and bonds to the public without egotistical, power hungry government trying to block this growth of the American economy from happening.
More comment. We never needed securities agencies to regulate stock and bond offers. If the stock and bond offers ever proved fraudulent, under common law the would-be con artists could later go to prison for this or be massively sued for this or both. If the stock and bond offers did not use the funds raised for the stated purposes, then the people behind the stock and bonds offers could be sued for non-performance of carrying out the terms of the business offer or else willful fraud with no intent to carry out the business commitment made. If any stock or bond offer was carried out with good intent and the business plan failed, the parties offering the stock or bond offer were not liable for a bad business commitment that did not work out as planned. They could not be civilly sued nor criminally prosecuted for honest effort made with the funds raised. However, the track record of the early stock and bond offers made in America created many of the largest industries in America later on. Since heavy regulation of stock and bond offers, the growth of American industry maybe has only been as much as 10% to 20% maximum of what America would have had in industrialization of America, millions of new great jobs in America, and America still the undisputed industrial leader of the world instead of the fast falling star other nations are planning to replace with their own nations.
You have to have freedom to make free enterprise work, not massive regulations meaning the dumb bureaucrats try to sink the American economy like Soviet Communist bureaucrats in the Soviet Union massively held back the economy of Russia. They held it from massive economic growth while the idiots in government ran the economy instead of the talented private citizens of Russia who knew how to make the economy grow fast through free enterprise! Once the American people are tired of the idiotic bureaucrats running the American economy instead of the talented citizens of America who only need the freedom to act and the American economy then skyrockets, pass our proposed Omni Law. Its full technical name is "The Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America" and is designed to skyrocket the American econonomy once passed by using the answers that have worked spectacularly before in history and will do the same once allowed to again in America! Constitutional amendments can be passed like lightning in America if the people care and the politicians know it. The 26th Amendment was proposed by Congress on March 23, 1971 and ratification completed like lightning by the States of America by June 30, 1971. As one member of Congress once told one of my representatives years ago, "When you show us that the people care, then we will care. Until then don't bother us!" They did not like that I proposed giving the American people the power of legal referendum over the government when it did not want to do the will of the American people.
Our national website is www.fastboomamericaneconomy.
Hate to have to say this but Wash., D.C. under Obama just can't get it out of their system how badly they want to be a police state over America and not a Constitutional Government over America. Yesterday, Feb. 2, 2014, I was talking with a friend of mine from Virginia. I wanted to see if the fed boys were respecting the rights of the American people now as claimed by Obama or just another propaganda line of Obama to try and keep the people sedated with propaganda until America was a total police state under plan of Obama. I covered some legitimate issues and then deliberately began pouring it on on all the ways we could punish under law those officials and employees who did not respect the rights of the American people under law. I poured it on thick to see if I could bait any federal sources listening in on our phone call as I was sure they were in violation of the respect of our legal rights as claimed by Obama to the American people. Finally, I pushed our would-be federal censors over the line and we heard this big crash of the line going dead by our would-be federal censors. They wanted to make sure that we knew that they had cut off our phone line. We called each other again a few minutes later and I told my friend from Virgina that the federal idiots just pushed up my legal financial claims against Wash., D.C. up to $180 trillion and also the same $180 trillion claim against federal officials or employees engaged in civil rights schemes such as cutting off our phone line and so obviously yesterday.
Now if federal sources want to serve on a silver platter to us when the Omni Law is passed the names of those federal personnel yesterday who tried to censor our phone call from criticizing Wash., D.C., I will knock off $5 trillion from the legal settlement figures Wash., D.C. now faces and will have to pay to me when the time is right to show how they are forced to pay and don't know it yet. Also, as a highly trained economist, I know where the money is hidden that can pay such a giant financial damage claim to me, but don't want to let the cat out of the bag yet! Also, guess I will tip off my backers in the Omni Law. Remember you get 10% of the gross figure of settlement with me and that is huge by now! I don't think you will cry over this! Also, with my legal action making it impossible to stop this from recovering money owed to America, money beyond my settlement figure will be used to pay off the national debt, state debts, and what is left will be divided pro-rata between all American citizens 18 years of age and older. The American people have very strong reason to back me and my Omni Law Drive to pass the "Omnibus Civil Rights Act For America" which is on my national website, in the search engine for Nesara News for the reports that have posted with Nesara News, and also Google Search Engine gave us several listings on their first page the other day.
I had to have someone so criminal as Obama in true character to have been able to build up these legal financial settlement figures up to $180 trillion now. The power elite would be smart to dump Obama as fast as they can. The boy was so dumb that he never repaid me the $525,000 that federal operatives stole from me to try and block me from reestablishing my father's Vatican endorsed food process in America once more. It is not the amount but the charges of world genocide conspiracy that hang upon why Obama never repaid me the $525,000 stolen from me by federal operatives is what gives full legal force to the now $180 trillion settlement figure that Obama, Eric Holder, and some other federal sources are going to find that they are actually liable for this figure and all those financially hit by lawsuits because they are close to Obama are going to want to hang him alive after they realize what he has done to them! I have deliberately been hiding it until the right time, but I have won powerful legal upsets before. I was the chess champion in military school and won my games by making the other side think I was dumber than I really was until the ambush was complete and then I went into the checkmate move with the other side wondering, "How in the world did he ever do that?"
Contary to what Obama thinks, America is going to survive him, get back on its feet, Christianity is going to strongly revive in America, and our economy will become the most powerful and spectacular probably in world history. I did not waste my time studying with six of the most brilliant economists of America and Europe! I picked their brains of every smart idea they had!
Pass this report around. When America knows its legal rights, then Wash., D.C. has to finally respect these legal rights of the American people! Only the ignorant have no legal rights in America because tyranny can only grow if the people do not know how really strong they are under law once they use it for their side!
Yours For God And Country, Erasmus Of America (pen name for that American who judged the American people needed someone who knew the power tricks of the other side so the American people would win this time and not the other side in America! Once we pass the Omni Law, we have won the game in America! This is power chess and I know how to play it! The American people win this time by seriously backing the smart leaders in America rather than the corrupt leaders in America!)
