Tonys replay

Listen  to the 1st 10 mins. Thats all

REPLAY                     805-399-1500    409029#

AngelQuest Recorded CC and Thoughts from I4U Tuesday PM

Date: Feb 4, 2014 2:52 PM

AngelQuest Recorded CC and Thoughts from I4U Tuesday PM 02/04/2014 [..SweetQueen] URGENT URGENT URGENT URGENT URGENT AQ CALL FOR THE WHOLE REASON THE GCR IS BEING HELD UP..... THIS IS THE RECORDED CALL FROM ANGELQUEST..... RECORDED NUMBER    530-881-1499 644902# [Papa Bear] AQ -Congress refusing RV [Papa Bear] 2010 accord and our Congress non agreement [misskitty05] AQ: there must be an agreement among relevant countries with each signing on the dotted line before the GCR can move forward in her opinion [mbillions] AQ The IMF is trying to get more power than what they need... [Papa Bear] Very enlightening on stall of GCR [Robertprofessor] Comes down to the US willing to give up its dominant voting position on the IMF..... Read More Link on Right     [Papa Bear] mbillions We have the majority of power because we have most voting rights [misskitty05] OKCRN yes.. she's saying all relevant countries must come to an agreement first before congress will move forward [Papa Bear] 2010 accord not approved by Congress [mbillions] Papa Bear I think she was saying that congress didn't approve payment for those voting rights... not sure.. .came in at the end... [Papa Bear] mbillions Yep [misskitty05] she said something about all other countries wanting to have an equal say. Right now, USA has a very significant say in what goes on... US not willing to give that up and that's why congress hasn't done what it needs to do to finalize this [#2sister] mbillions what voting rights? [mbillions] #2sister Within the IMF [..SweetQueen] THIS IS FROM ANGELQUEST..... OKAY HERE IS THE LINK TO THAT ARTICLE........ THIS IS BLATANTLY TELLING US THEIR IS A VOTE FOR POWER IN THE WORLD GLOBAL GOING-ON...........OUR CONGRESS HAS REFUSED TO AGREE TO THE 2010 ACCORD PER THE IMF POWER....AT PRESENT WE DO HAVE SOME POWER AND REGARDLESS OF ALL GURUS TELLING YOU IT IS THE AMOUNT YOU GET THEY ARE WRONG THIS IS A BIGGER PICTURE THE VOTING POWER OF THE USA..............   http://www.nytimes.com/2014/02/05/opinion/the-imf-needs-a-reset.html?_r=2 [Robertprofessor] Somehow there must be a compromise agreement that satifisfies the USG and the rest of the world. [Robertprofessor] The US has held the dominant position since Bretton Woods agreement that was made in NH (Washington Hotel) in 1944 because we were the country that was to emerge from WW2 with the strongest economy. According to AQ unless we give up our dominant voting position within the IMF, there will be no GCR. [sooner84] Robertprofessor Sounds like that will drag this out a long time sandytob] Robertprofessor sounds like a no win situation. [Papa Bear] misskitty05 Because we have majority of voting rights [misskitty05] Papa Bear yes [Digs] Robertprofessor highly unlikley that we would give up Voting rights... IMHO [sooner84] It sounds like the IMF is not able to push this whole thing through like they said they would do if the US doesn't. [Robertprofessor] Whatever the final agreement will look like, I'm convinced that China and the US need each other equally. The voting power on the IMF board must reflect that in some fashion so both giants have what they need. [#3sister] Robertprofessor How do you know its real? we have been lied to so many times its not funny [Robertprofessor] #3sister Know what is real? What AQ said today? What Tony is saying? Or that this funny money will someday secure your financial future? [Robertprofessor] #3sister I go to the most basic things about the investment for assurance: the dinar was artificially devalued as part of a war. That's normal in warfare. Also normal that in time the value of the currency is reinstated. Iraq has amazing wealth in the ground. [Robertprofessor] #3sister What is not normal with Iraq's currency is that so many other things have been tied to it, which has caused the reinstatement or revaluation to take much longer than normal after a country has lost a war. [Robertprofessor] #3sister The hold up is non agreement as Angel Quest explained. And how to get agreement maybe as impossible as squaring a circle, but AQ also said they could agree today. [Papa Bear] I say NICE JOB AQ. TY http://www.dinarrecaps.com/1/post/2014/02/angelquest-recorded-cc-and-thoughts-from-i4u-tuesday-pm.html

Subject: Fwd: REUTERS: WELLS FARGO DIRECTOR RESIGNS FOR HEALTH REASONS

fyi --- good morning have a great day

Wells Fargo director resigns for health reasons Mon Feb 3, 2014 5:33pm EST The logo for Wells Fargo bank is pictured in downtown Los Angeles, California July 17, 2012. Credit: Reuters/Fred Prouser (Reuters) - Wells Fargo & Co (WFC.N) said on Monday that board member Howard V. "Rick" Richardson had resigned, citing personal health-related reasons. Richardson, a retired partner at PricewaterhouseCoopers, joined the board twelve months ago in January 2013. He had served as the chair of the audit and examination committee, a role that will be assumed by current director James H. Quigley. The bank said in a regulatory filing that the resignation was not "a result of any disagreement with the company, the board or management." Visit stage3alpha at: http://s3alpha.net/?xg_source=msg_mes_network To control which emails you receive on stage3alpha, click here

Subject: Fwd: SDR'S AND THE NEW BRETTON WOODS-PART 3 (PARTS 1 & 2 INCLUDED)

I sent this cause it was written by jc Collins I didn't read it yet

SDR’s and the New Bretton Woods – Part Three February 4, 2014 JC Collins Leave a comment The Real Global Currency Reset By JC Collins Have no doubt about it, the so called Global Currency Reset is already happening, and it’s happening by the International Monetary Fund restructuring the world’s wealth through the emerging markets.  Sovereign debt is at a 200 year high.  Fiat currencies are on the verge of collapse.  Stock markets are hovering over nothing but the illusionary ether from which they climbed.  And if you listen carefully you’ll notice that all countries are speaking from the same script. So how did we get here? Though this is a multi-part series, all the other essays on philosophyofmetrics.com have something to do with the process which has come to be called the Global Currency Reset or the Great Consolidation.  Such a complex process is not easily understood or easily explained. Revolutions are ideal methods to exact transformation upon a civilization.  The banking powers which still control the world today gained that control through revolutions such as the French Revolution, the Bolshevik Revolution, etc. They are working within the same methodology today. We are seeing mass protests against governments for the sovereign debt problem which is threatening the world with total collapse.  What is little understood by the majority of the people is that the sovereign debt problems are being caused and facilitated by the very same banks that will stand to gain from any global currency reset.  The reset will be the solution offered in response to the reaction of the people, being the protests and revolutions, which stems from the problem of sovereign debt and currency collapse. Can we not see through the smoke and mirrors too observe the obviousness of the Hegelian Dialectic at play?  The banks take control of most of the countries of the world through revolution, war, famine, economic sanctions, and then set up central banks in these countries.  The central bank of each country quickly gets to work on lending the government of their respective countries the debt money it needs to function and maintain the carefully engineered economic equilibrium of the population. Eventually sovereign debt becomes too large and the whole system is threatened with collapse. Once again, how did we come to be here? What we are witnessing is a carefully worded script to effect the problem, reaction, solution of the Hegelian Dialectic.  This script is being written by the Bank for International Settlements.  The B.I.S. decides and disseminates all central banking policies and regulations for the central banks of each country in the world. Today’s “problem” began, for the most part, with the 1988 Basel Accord.  This accord was engineered by the B.I.S. through its main location in Basel, Switzerland.  The Basel One regulation set minimum capital requirements for the central banks of the world.  This policy was trickled down to the chartered banks within each country.  On the surface Basel One appeared harmless. It wasn’t until the Basel Two regulations came out many years later that the first red flag should have been noticed.  This regulation, along with the minimum requirements of Basel One, allowed the banks to increase their risk by way of leverage and investments.  It can be argued that Basel Two regulations were directly responsible for the subprime mortgage crisis of 2008.  Therein the “problem” is given full birth. From then on the “problem” develops into corporate bail-outs and eventually onto the sovereign debt crisis we are facing today. The solution is found in the Basel Three regulations.  In brief, these regulations force banks to increase liquidity and lays out the structure for currencies to become asset supported.  It is in this regulation that the Bank for International Settlements puts forth the final stage to the great consolidation, of which the global currency reset is but one part. It’s interesting that many on the internet are saying that the banking powers of the world are about to be overthrown because of the Basel Three regulations and the economic reset which will come as a product of its full implementation by 2018.  Isn’t it recognized that the Basel Three regulations are a product of those same banking powers?  They’re certainly not overthrowing themselves. What is happening is the tightening down of the bolts, the closing of loopholes, and the streamlining of processes.  When it’s all said and done, the Bank for International Settlements will have more control than they do today.  Period. With that being said, there is evidence of negotiations taking place behinds the scenes. Let’s not rely on rumor and internet conjecture for this evidence.  Let’s go directly to the International Monetary Fund itself. In the I.M.F. press release dated January 23rd, 2014, it states the following: “The Executive Board reiterates the importance and urgency of the 2010 Reforms for strengthening the Fund’s effectiveness and legitimacy. This includes ensuring that, as a quota-based institution, the Fund has sufficient permanent resources to meet members’ needs and that its governance structure evolves in line with members’ changing positions in the world economy.” What they are saying here is that the implementation of the new Executive Board, which includes China and other BRICS countries (See SDR’s and the New Bretton Woods – Part One) needs to happen as soon as possible.  These new members will make much needed capital injections into the quota fund to meet overall member needs.  Here we need to consider the sovereign debt of all the countries of the world and the consolidation of this debt through the I.M.F. as it was designed to be.  It also makes clear that the governance structure of the Executive Board will reflect the “members changing positions in the world economy”. Let’s continue with the press release. “The Executive Board proposes that the deadline for the completion of the Fifteenth Review be moved from January 2014 to January 2015. Furthermore, the Executive Board recognizes that the immediate priority is the effectiveness of the Fourteenth Review and Board Reform Amendment. Accordingly, the Executive Board proposes that the Board of Governors adopt a Resolution expressing its deep regret that the Fourteenth Review and the Board Reform Amendment have not become effective and urge the remaining members who have not yet accepted the Fourteenth Review quota increases and the Board Reform Amendment to do so without further delay”. So in the first sentence the I.M.F. is clearly suggesting that the deadline for the economic reset be pushed out to January, 2015.  On top of that, it’s calling for a “resolution” expressing their disappointment that some members have yet to accept the new quota regulations and are pushing those members to implement the changes “without further delay”. Don’t let the “quota increases” term fool you.  What they are talking about here is surrender of the economic sovereignty of member countries.  In this simple term will be found the passage of ownership over the Federal Reserve System to foreign powers.  And remember, as we learned in Part One of this series, Jack Lew of the Treasury is pushing Congress to pass legislation which will support what the I.M.F. is requesting. As we move through the year and get closer and closer to the Great Consolidation it will be important to remain focused on what is really happening.  The Great Consolidation will be the relinquishing of sovereignty and the Global Currency Reset will be one of the major steps towards this end. We will hear more of the sovereign debt issue.  We will witness the turmoil of the currency exchange markets.  Revolutions will take place on the television right before our eyes.  The people of the world will be told daily that the collapse of the whole system is imminent.  At some point, the negotiations hinted at above will be concluded.  The currencies of the world will be revalued and the debts of the world consolidated. Make no mistake about it, the Global Currency Reset and the Great Consolidation will mean the end of sovereignty, including the sovereignty of the United States. And at the same time, all the countries of the world continue to develop police state procedures along with the implementation of technologies to ensure successful management of the “reaction” stage of the Hegelian Dialectic Triad. This is the real Global Currency Reset.  Order out of chaos. There were other matters which I wanted to cover in part three of this series.  But I felt it was important to set a few things straight about the reset first.  In the next installment we will get back on track and delve once again into the structure of SDR compositions.  We will take a closer look at specific regions, including Canada and the Keystone XL Pipeline, agreements between Iraq and Iran on oil strategies (hint: so called “dinarians” are not going to be happy), and how all sovereign debts, including historical bonds, will be included in the Great Consolidation.    – JC Collins End Note:  There is so much involved in the creation of this “New Bretton Woods” that I will not limit the amount of expected installments in this series.  I will keep writing and providing info until such a time as the system is in place or all processes and structures have been clearly defined, whichever comes first. SDR’s and the New Bretton Woods – Part One SDR’s and the New Bretton Woods – Part Two Visit stage3alpha at: http://s3alpha.net/?xg_source=msg_mes_network To control which emails you receive on stage3alpha, click here

Sheriffs Have NO Jurisdiction With Murder ANYMORE!

Sheriffs and Larry Klayman,

Now the FEDS can come into the picture as MANY Murders can be now conceived as dealing with Obamacare.
Ann Coulter heard from a lady that said her sisted died from having NO insurance as Obamacare Canceled it!
Now when someone was denied treatment at a hospital it must be assumed that it was because they were NOT signed up with Obamacare, so the FEDS step in and MAKE a CASE of their own and BAR the Sheriffs and Local Police from getting involved!
Then there will be 10,000 cases per month that the FEDS CAN NOT be involved in, as they are overloaded, so the Murderers go FREE!

Ann Coulter: “My friend’s sister died today because of Obamacare”
http://www.infowars.com/ann-coulter-my-friends-sister-died-today-because-of-obamacare/
Tom Tillison
bizpacreview.com
February 4, 2014

When pressed on the negative impact Obamacare is having on average folks, Democrats choose to focus on those who are being helped by the healthcare law.

But conservative pundit and authorAnn Coulter highlighted just how devastating the impact can be in a recent appearance on “Fox & Friends.”

“This does have real world consequences: I got up the other morning and got an email from a friend saying, ‘My sister almost died because of Obamacare,’” Coulter told host Tucker Carlson.

Read more...

Dan

Okie just now...

from Okie just now...

TODAY THE TRUTH WILL BE EVIDENT.

KEEP YOUR EARS AND EYES OPEN TO WHAT

HAS BEEN HAPPENING THAT WAS EXPOSED

TO ME THIS MORNING.

I WILL BE AT LIBERTY SOON I HOPE FOR THE

EXPOSE' OF THE ACTIONS OF A FEW THAT WILL

AFFECT US ALL.

--NOTICE------US TREASURY---BETTER RUN AND HIDE

----NUFF SAID

------BLESSINGS GALORE

==========================================================

Subject: Okie 2-4

.OKIEOILMAN] GOOD TUESDAY MORNING AMERICA, SHIPS AT SEA AND ALL OUR WORLD WIDE FREINDS. TODAY WILL BE A DAY OF REVELATION TO MOST DINARIANS. TODAY YOU WILL HEAR AND KNOW THE TRUTH OF THE CORRUPTION, MANIPULATION AND DOWN RIGHT ILLEGALITY TRANSPIRING. TODAY SHOULD GIVE US NEW PERSPECTIVES AND A NEW DIRECTION TO FOLLOW. UNTIL NOW WE(ALL OF US) HAVE BEEN PURPOSEFULLY FURNISHED INFORMATION THAT WAS FOR THE EXCLUSIVE BENEFIT OF FINANCIAL INSTITUTIONS AND BANKS. TODAY THE TRUTH WILL BE EVIDENT. KEEP YOUR EARS AND EYES OPEN TO WHAT HAS BEEN HAPPENING THAT WAS EXPOSED TO ME THIS MORNING. I WILL BE AT LIBERTY SOON I HOPE FOR THE EXPOSE' OF THE ACTIONS OF A FEW THAT WILL AFFECT US ALL.--NOTICE------US TREASURY---BETTER RUN AND HIDE----NUFF SAID------BLESSINGS GALORE.

[..OKIEOILMAN] I WOULD IMAGINE THE US TREASURY HAS A NEW SONG THIS MORNING-----"WHATCHA GONNA DO WHEN THEY COME FOR YOU---BAD BOYS-BAD BOYS"

[..OKIEOILMAN] IF YOU AS INVESTORS ONLY KNEW A SCINTILLA OF TRUTH ABOUT WHAT HAS AND IS PRESENTLY GOING ON POLITICALLY ----YOU WOULD "PUKE"

LAW OF FLAG

LAW OF FLAG

PIRACY: A Crime With Ancient Origins in 1819, Congress responded by passing an antipiracy law to extend U.S. jurisdiction over pirates of all nationalities.

Courts: The flag in court is the court's "constructive notice" of the laws governing their contracts. If you do not wish to contract with these courts, challenge jurisdiction. 

See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/204298087/Direct-Challenge-to-Personal-Authority

The gold-fringed flag that utilizes color of law and portends to be the American flag is NOT the American flag of peace. It is a pirate flag and it is your warning as to whom/what you are about to do business with. Army Regulation 260-10 states that the gold fringe may be used only on regimental "colors," the President's flag, for a military courts martial and for the flags used at military recruiting centers. 

PIRACY defined: The act of violence or depredation on the high seas; also, the theft of Intellectual Property, especially in electronic media. Piracy is a crime with ancient origins. As long as there have been ships at sea, pirates have sought to steal from them. Internationally, laws against piracy have ancient origins, too, but U.S. law developed chiefly in the eighteenth and nineteenth century. The power to criminalize piracy originated in the U.S. Constitution, which was followed by the first federal law in 1790 and crucial revisions over the next sixty years. Additionally, the United States and other nations cooperated to combat piracy in the twentieth century. This resulted in a unique shared view of jurisdiction: piracy on the high seas can be punished by any nation. In the late twentieth century, the term piracy grew to include Copyright violations of intellectual property such as music, films, and computer software.

The Constitution addresses piracy in Article 1, Section 8. It gives Congress "the Power … To define and punish Piracies and Felonies committed on the high Seas, and Offenses against the Law of Nations." Generally, the definition of pirates meant rogue operators at sea—independent criminals who hijacked ships, stole their cargo, or committed violence against their crew. But standards in all areas under the law changed in response to judicial rulings and to historical incidents, forming by the mid-1800s what became the basis for contemporary law.

In 1790 Congress enacted the first substantive antipiracy law, a broad ban on murder and Robbery at sea that carried the death penalty. In 1818, however, the U.S. Supreme Court ruled that the law was limited to crimes involving U.S. citizens: U.S. jurisdiction did not cover foreigners whose piracy targeted other foreigners (United States v. Palmer, 16 U.S. [3 Wheat.] 610). A year later, in 1819, Congress responded by passing an antipiracy law to extend U.S. jurisdiction over pirates of all nationalities.

By the mid-nineteenth century, two other important changes occurred. Penalties for certain piracy crimes—revolt and mutiny—were reduced and were no longer punishable by death. Then the Mexican War of 1846–48 brought a radical extension of the definition of a pirate. The traditional definition of an independent criminal was broadened to include sailors acting on commissions from foreign nations, if and when their commissions violated U.S. treaties with their government. The Piracy Act of 1847, which established this broader definition, marked the last major change in U.S. piracy law.

Today, the primary source of antipiracy law is title 18, chapter 81, of the United States Code, although numerous other antipiracy provisions are scattered throughout the code. Additionally, international cooperation has shaped a unique form of jurisdictional agreement among nations. Significant in bringing about this cooperation was the geneva convention on the High Seas of April 29, 1958 and the 1982 United Nations Convention on the Law of the Sea. The primary effect of such agreements is to allow pirates to be apprehended on the high seas—meaning outside of territorial limits—by the authorities of any nation and punished under its own law. This standard is unique because nations are generally forbidden by International Law from interfering with the vessels of another nation on the high seas. It arose because piracy itself has never vanished; in fact, since the 1970s, it has appeared to have undergone a resurgence.

Apart from its traditional definition, piracy also refers to copyright violations. Committed both in the United States and abroad, this form of piracy includes the unauthorized storage, reproduction, distribution, or sale of intellectual property—for example, music CDs, movie videocassettes, and even fashion designs. The term has been applied, in particular, to the piracy of computer software, which is highly susceptible to theft because of its ease of duplication. Estimates of the cost to copyright holders ranges in the billions of dollars annually. U.S. law protects copyright holders under the Copyright Act (17 U.S.C.S. § 109 [1993]), and a 1992 federal law makes software piracy a felony (Pub. L. No. 102-561, 106 Stat. 4233, codified at 18 U.S.C.A. § 2319 [1988 & 1992 Supp.]). Since the 1990s, a number of international treaties and conventions, as well as diplomatic initiatives, have sought to forge greater cooperation among nations to combat such piracy.

SUITS IN ADMIRALTY ACT defined: Federal statute giving injured parties the right to sue the government in admiralty. 46 U.S.C.A. §§ 741-752. Donily v. U. S., D.C.Or., 381 F.Supp. 901. See also Sovereign immunity.

FOREIGN NATION or STATE defined: A nation totally independent of the United States of America 2. The constitution authorizes congress to regulate commerce with "foreign nations." This phrase does not include an Indian tribe, situated within the boundaries of a state, and exercising the powers of government and sovereignty. 5 Pet. R. 1. Vide Nation. A Law Dictionary Adapted To The Constitution and Laws of the United States of America and of the Several States of the American Union by John Bouvier Revised Sixth Edition, 1856

Whereas defined pursuant to; For purposes of this chapter— (a) A “foreign state”, except as used in section 1608 of this title, includes a political subdivision of a foreign state or an agency or instrumentality of a foreign state as defined in subsection (b). (b) An “agency or instrumentality of a foreign state” means any entity— (1) which is a separate legal person, corporate or otherwise, and (2) which is an organ of a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, or a majority of whose shares or other ownership interest is owned by a foreign state or political subdivision thereof, and (3) which is neither a citizen of a State of the United States as defined in section 1332 (c) and (e) of this title, nor created under the laws of any third country. (c) The “United States” includes all territory and waters, continental or insular, subject to the jurisdiction of the United States.

Further readings: Menefee, Samuel Pyeatt. 1990/1991."'Yo Heave Ho!': Updating America's Piracy Laws." California Western International Law Journal 21; Short, Greg. 1994."Combatting Software Piracy: Can Felony Penalties for Copyright Infringement Curtail the Copying of Computer Software?" Santa Clara Computer and High Technology Law Journal 10 (June).

Cross-references Admiralty and Maritime Law; Computer Crime; Hijacking

See: http://www.scribd.com/doc/203855752/Law-of-Flag

Stop Resisting Execution: Cold-Blooded Arizona Cops Assassinate Suspect with His Hands in the Air -- blacklistednews.com

THEY DO IT BECAUSE THEY CAN GET AWAY WITH IT - NO AMERI-KANS ARE STOPPING THEM -  DO UNTO OTHERS AS YOU WOULD HAVE THEM DO UNTO YOU - TIME FOR RECIPROCATION AND EXECUTIONS OF THE EXECUTORS.....

http://www.blacklistednews.com/Stop_Resisting_Execution%3A_Cold-Blooded_Arizona_Cops_Assassinate_Suspect_with_His_Hands_in_the_Air/32575/0/0/0/Y/M.html

Stop Resisting Execution: Cold-Blooded Arizona Cops Assassinate Suspect with His Hands in the Air

February 3, 2014

Kimberly Paxton Reports:

For absolutely no reason other than “because they could”, cops in Pinal County, Arizona executed a suspect who was standing there, not near any of the officers, with his hands in the air, offering no threat whatsoever.  Without trial, judge, or jury, they simply assassinated the man, as his family looked on in horror. Warning: There is some graphic violence in the video below.
This is your police force, America. Protecting and Serving you to death.

   http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_HrF_SYx1js

---

"People will generally accept facts as truth, only if the facts agree with what they already believe." -- Andy Rooney &

"Facts do not cease to exist because they are ignored.” – Aldous Huxley

Cold Case Posse Asked Orly to Stand Down

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Cold Case Posse Asked Orly to Stand Down

Posted By: RumorMail [Send E-Mail]
Date: Tuesday, 4-Feb-2014 10:08:42

For what it is worth. http://www.freerepublic.com/focus/f-news/3119060/posts Cold Case Posse Asked Orly to Stand Down Orly Tatz | 2/4/2014 | Orly Tatz Posted on Tuesday, February 04, 2014 9:23:18 AM by GregNH Dear Orly: I have been in daily contact with Detective Lieutenant Mike Zullo from the Sheriff Joe Arpaio Maricopa County Sheriff’s Office Obama Fraud Investigation – sometimes twice daily. I’m sure you also might have heard that Lt. Zullo is preparing to release his some evidence that will truly be universe-shattering, and the knowledge we have is truly something you’re not going to be ready for. This will absolutely, definitely change the eligibility landscape by 10,000%. Mike has asked me to communicate with you that the new evidence – which, let me tell you, is so all-encompassingly gigantic, so incredibly huge – that we were hoping we could ask you to cooperate on one front. Now, since we’ve all been vindicated 1,000% on the birth certificate issue, since Lt. Zullo’s forensic investigation has been so comprehensive, it’s really irrelevant compared to the new, shocking & completely emasculating evidence. The birth certificate is truly no longer of any real concern. And we feel that way also about the Social Security Number issue. Mike said he was slightly embarrassed but he feels as though there might be some unnecessary friction between you two, even though we all share the same goals, and that we and the posse support all the work you’ve done over the years. But we would like to request that you stand down with regard to your ongoing court cases, which appear to have already run their course, you must admit. I cannot overstate the importance that your cooperation will bring to the disclosure of this essential information. If so, we’d request that these court proceedings be respectfully closed by March 19, when Lt. Zullo and Sheriff Arpaio and I will make our announcement. And believe me – it’s going to be the most incredible, universe-shattering thing you’ve ever heard! Mike said he’s confident that you’ll cooperate, as we bring to a close this horrible chapter in our fine, Christian country to a close. Thank you in advance, Dr. Taitz. It will be a pleasure to watch Mr. Whoever-he-is be taken where he needs to be taken. With our most humble respect, The Rev. Dr. Carl Gallups, M.Div. ppsimmons Radio Ministryhttp://www.carlgallups.com WEBY 1330 a.m. Freedom Friday

Philosophy 101 - updated

Here is an updated version of this favorite.

 Philosophy 101

Why Did The Chicken Cross The Road?

SARAH PALIN:  The chicken crossed the road because, gosh-darn it, he's a maverick!

BARACK OBAMA: Let me be perfectly clear, if the chickens like their eggs they can keep their eggs.  No chicken will be required to cross the road to surrender her eggs.  Period.

JOHN McCAIN:  My friends, the chicken crossed the road because he recognized the need to engage in cooperation and dialogue with all the chickens on the other side of the road.

HILLARY CLINTON:  What difference at this point does it make why the chicken crossed the road.

GEORGE W. BUSH:  We don't really care why the chicken crossed the road.  We just want to know if the chicken is on our side of the road or not.  The chicken is either with us or against us.  There is no middle ground here.

DICK CHENEY:  Where's my gun?

COLIN POWELL:  Now to the left of the screen, you can clearly see the satellite image of the chicken crossing the road.

BILL CLINTON:  I did not cross the road with that chicken.

AL GORE:  I invented the chicken.

JOHN KERRY:  Although I voted to let the chicken cross the road, I am now against it!  It was the wrong road to cross, and I was misled about the chicken's intentions.  I am not for it now, and will remain against it.

AL SHARPTON:  Why are all the chickens white?

DR. PHIL:  The problem we have here is that this chicken won't realize that he must first deal with the problem on this side of the road before it goes after the problem on the other side of the road.  What we need to do is help him realize how stupid he is acting by not taking on his current problems before adding any new problems.

OPRAH:  Well, I understand that the chicken is having problems, which is why he wants to cross the road so badly.  So instead of having the chicken learn from his mistakes and take falls, which is a part of life, I'm going to give this chicken a NEW CAR so that he can just drive across the road and not live his life like the rest of the chickens.

ANDERSON COOPER:  We have reason to believe there is a chicken, but we have not yet been allowed to have access to the other side of the road.

NANCY GRACE:  That chicken crossed the road because he's guilty!  You can see it in his eyes and the way he walks.

PAT BUCHANAN:  To steal the job of a decent, hardworking American.

MARTHA STEWART:  No one called me to warn me which way the chicken was going.  I had a standing order at the Farmer's Market to sell my eggs when the price dropped to a certain level.  No little bird gave me any insider information.

DR SEUSS:  Did the chicken cross the road?  Did he cross it with a toad?  Yes, the chicken crossed the road, but why it crossed I've not been told.

ERNEST HEMINGWAY:  To die in the rain, alone.

JERRY FALWELL:  Because the chicken was gay!  Can't you people see the plain truth?  That's why they call it the 'other side.'  Yes, my friends, that chicken was gay.  If you eat that chicken, you will become gay too.  I say we boycott all chickens until we sort out this abomination that the Liberal media whitewashes with seemingly harmless phrases like 'the other side.'  That chicken should not be crossing the road.  It's as plain and as simple as that.

GRANDPA:  In my day we didn't ask why the chicken crossed the road.  Somebody told us the chicken crossed the road, and that was good enough for us.

BARBARA WALTERS:  Isn't that interesting?  In a few moments, we will be listening to the chicken tell, for the first time, the heart warming story of how it experienced a serious case of molting, and went on to accomplish its lifelong dream of crossing the road.

ARISTOTLE:  It is the nature of chickens to cross the road.

JOHN LENNON:  Imagine all the chickens in the world crossing roads together, in peace.

BILL GATES:  I have just released eChicken2013, which will not only cross roads, but will lay eggs, file your important documents and balance your checkbook.  Internet Explorer is an integral part of eChicken2013.  This new platform is much more stable and will never reboot.

ALBERT EINSTEIN:  Did the chicken really cross the road, or did the road move beneath the chicken?

COLONEL SANDERS:  Did I miss one?