TOM HENEGHAN INTELLIGENCE BRIEFINGS
ALL Patriot Americans MUST know, with sources inside
American/European intelligence agencies and INTERPOL,
reporting what is really going on behind the scenes of the
corporate-controlled, fascist, extortion-friendly
propaganda U.S. media's massive deceptions
Protect and defend YOUR Constitution
Bill of Rights,
the Supreme Law of the United States
http://www.tomheneghanbriefings.com/
https://twitter.com/Tom_Heneghan
Sunday November 2, 2014
80 TRILLION in Yen, Oh My!
by Tom Heneghan, International Intelligence
Expert
UNITED States of
America - It can
now be reported that $40 trillion principle plus interest accruals tied
to the World Financial Settlements and the Wanta-Reagan-Mitterrand
Protocols were ILLEGALLY converted and cross-collateralized by the
privately owned U.S. Federal Reserve and the Central Bank of Japan into
$80 trillion of Japanese yen derivatives.
The Central Bank of Japan, along with the privately owned U.S. Federal
Reserve are now counter parties to each other with the pension funds of
U.S. and Japanese citizens now totally at risk!
P.S. This latest derivative ponzi scheme started when Alibaba CEO Jack
Ma and U.S. banking giant JPMorgan wrote derivatives on U.S. pension
funds enabling the Alibaba IPO (Alibaba IPO stock issue) to be issued at
$98 a share rather than $68 a share.
P.P.S.
The latest Japanese yen ponzi scheme is nothing more than a short term
bank 'Bail-Out', which will be followed by a massive bank 'Bail-In'
LOOTING the entire pension funds of American citizens coinciding with a
collapse of worldwide equities.
Reference:
Don't be fooled, folks. The banks are currently short in the entire
world equity markets. So, if you own Alibaba, SELL IT!
Stay tuned for future intelligence briefings including an update on
both the U.S. Military and the Chinese Military complete opposition to
their current governments.
Note: The recent crashes involving NASA rockets.
______________________________
Date:
Sun, 2 Nov 2014 04:24:36 -0800
From: somam@prodigy.net
Subject: ISA_ US Code - Chapter 11 - Part 1 - Title 18 USC Section
201<BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS and WITNESSES_circa2014
To: scheduling@who.eop.gov; info@barackobama.com; potus44@whitehouse.gov;
bom.omb@whitehouse.gov; info@mail.whitehouse.gov; scheduling@ovp.eop.gov;
breed@ovp.eop.gov; ahoffman@ovp.eop.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov;
askdoj@usdoj.gov; oig@sec.gov; jroberts@supremecourt.gov;
johnroberts@supremecourt.gov; flotus44@whitehouse.gov;
govgeneral@wisconsin.gov; jeannet@rebeccaforreal.com; gretawire@foxnews.com;
newsletter@vanhollenforag.com; criminal.division@usdoj.gov;
USUNPublicAffairs@state.gov; ethics@imf.org; jlew@who.eop.gov
CC: houston@ic.fbi.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov;
washington.field@ic.fbi.gov; washington.field@ic.fbi.gov
Writer Marilyn M. Barnewall acknowledges via tape
recording in her possession, that " Mr. X " in Thieves' World ( Simon
& Schuster - 1994 ) was FBI Assistant Director Jim Moody...
Sent: Tuesday, October 28, 2014 12:32 PM
Subject: ISA_ US Code – Chapter 11 – Part 1 – Title 18 USC Section
201<BRIBERY OF PUBLIC OFFICIALS and WITNESSES_circa2014
United
States Department of Justice / Criminal Division
Attn: Assistant Attorney General, Leslie R. Caldwell
Washington, DC 20530.0001 USA
via- email Criminal.Division@usdoj.gov
In the
matter of : Continuing Direct Violations of the United States Constitution,
RICO Statutes, as listed;
Pursuant to
:
a. Title 18
USC Section 4 – Misprision of Felony
Whoever,
having knowledge of the actual commission of a felony cognizable by a court of
the
United States, conceals and does not as soon as possible make known the same to
some judge
or other person in civil or military authority under the United States, shall be
fined under this title
or imprisoned not more than three years, or both.
My Mandated
Presidential Authority / The Honorable, Ronald W Reagan [ Executive Branch ] :
1. Totten Doctrine ( 92 U.S. 105, 107) Effective : January, 1981,
2. Presidential Executive Order No. 12333,
3. U.S Department of State / Rogers – Houston Memorandum,
4. National Security Directive / Operation : STILLPOINT
5. National Security Decision, Directive No. 166 ( March 27, 1985 – Afghanistan
),
6. U.S. Office of Special Counsel / OSC File No. MA – 11 – 3630 ( AUG 29, 2011
), et al ….
In reviewing
the continuing United States Obstruction of Justice Responsibilities and
Judicial Issues, I am leaglly
obligated under the Presidential Mandate to clearly state, once again the
following Judicial Issues for your immediate compliance,
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2014/09/17/puppetgate
Whereas, The
President of the United States of America, having signed H.R. 3723 on October
11, 1996, has protected this transaction by allowing Corporations the right to
declare their Contracts, Clients, Internal Procedures and Information, and the
transactions they engage in as a Corporate or Trade Secret fully protected
under the Economic and Industrial Espionage Laws of the United States of
America and the International Economic Community.
http://polymontana.com/ambassador-lee-emil-wanta/
http://www.wantarevelations.com/evidence/WANTA-Book.pdf
ISA_ US
Code - Chapter 11 - Part 1 - Title 18 USC Section 201<BRIBERY OF PUBLIC
OFFICIALS and WITNESSES_circa2014
To:
President Barack H Obama <>; U.S. President Barack H. Obama <>;
POTUS_U.S. President Barack H. Obama <>; Chief Justice_John G Roberts
<>; Chief Justice_John G Roberts <>; Attorney General Eric Holder
<>; United States of America <>; Governor Scott Walker <>;
WI_Gov Scott Walker <>; U.S. SECY TREASURY_JACK LEW <>; U.S. Spkr
John Boehner <>; Office of Inspector General <>; First
Lady_Michelle Obama <>; OVP_Vice President Joe Biden <>; OVP_Alan L
Hoffman <>; OVP_Chief of Staff Bruce Reed <>
Sent:
Tuesday, August 26, 2014 5:17 PM
info@mail.whitehouse.gov, potus44@whitehouse.gov, scheduling@who.eop.gov, jroberts@supremecourt.gov, jroberts@supremecourt.gov, askdoj@usdoj.gov,
USUNPublicAffairs@state.gov, govgeneral@wisconsin.gov,
govgeneralreply@wisconsin.gov, jlew@who.eop.gov,
office@messages.speaker.gov, inspector.general@usdoj.gov,
flotus44@whitehouse.gov, scheduling@ovp.eop.gov, ahoffman@ovp.eop.gov,
breed@ovp.eop.gov
SIMPLE
REMINDER RELATING TO THE CONTINUING LAWLESS AND DIRECT VIOLATIONS TO DENY THE
RELEASE OF U.S. TAXABLE RECEIPTS, IDENTIFIED INA. U.S. DISTRICT COURT - EASTERN
DISTRICT COURT OF VIRGINIA - CIVIL ACTION No. 1:07 CV 609 T3E /
BRP;LEE E. WANTA, LEO E. WANTA, AMBASSADOR LEO WANTA ( INDIVIDUALLY AND AS SOLE
AND EXCLUSIVE SHAREHOLDER OF AMERITRUST GROUPE, INC., ACOMMONWEALTH OF VIRGINIA
REGISTERED CORPORATION ), PETITIONER,
Vs
HENRY
M. PAULSON, JR.SECRETARY OF THE TREASURYUNITED STATES TREASURY, ANDROBERT M
KIMMITTDEPUTY SECRETARY OF THE TREASURYUNITED STATES TREASURY, ANDJAMES R.
WILKINSONCHIEF OF STAFFUNITED STATES TREASURY, ANDMICHAEL CHERTOFFSECRETARY
DEPARTMENT OF HOMELAND, ANDALBERTO R. GONZALESATTORNEY GENERALUNITED STATES
DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMONDDIRECTOR AND/OR MANAGER
OF OPERATIONS RESPONDENTS.B.
U.S.
DISTRICT COURT - EASTERN DISTRICT OF VIRGINIA - ALEXANDRIA DIVISION -
CIVIL ACTION No. 02 - 1363 - AAMBASSADOR LEO WANTA, PLAINTIFF, vs UNITED
STATES OF AMERICA, ET AL., DEFENDANTS.PAGE 10, PLAINTIFF'S SOLE REMEDY IN THIS
MATTER IS TO PROCEED WITH THE LIQUIDATION OF THE CORPORATIONS AND REPORT THESE
TRANSACTIONS TO THE INTERNAL REVENUE SERVICE IN ACCORDANCE WITH THE INTERNAL
REVENUE CODE AND THEN CHALLENGE THE ASSESSMENT OF ANY TAXES IN A REFUND
PROCEEDING.DATED : APRIL 15, 2003/S/ GERALD BRUCE LEEUNITED STATES DISTRICT
JUDGEPLEASE TAKE NOTICE : BANK OF CHINA - BEIJING REMITTED A CLEAR INWARD
REMITTANCE OF USDollars 4.5 TRILLION TO LEO E WANTA [MAY 2006] DIRECTLY PER
FEDERAL RESERVE BANK OF RICHMOND U.S. DISTRICT COURT TESTIMONY. ( CIVIL ACTION
No. 1:07 cv 609 T3E/BRP )C. STATE OF WISCONSIN - CIRCUIT COURT - BRANCH 2 -
COUNTY OF DANE and DANE COUNTY, WISCONSIN [ TWO (2) DIFFERENT COURT
IDENTITIES ]; CASE No. 92 - CF - 683, MAY 8, 1995;D. IN THE SUPREME COURT
OF THE UNITED STATES AMBASSADOR LEO E WANTA, SOMALIA AMBASSADOR TO CANADA AND
SWITZERLAND, DIPLOMATIC PASSPORTS No. 03462, 12535, PETITIONER, Vs. SECRETARY
RICHARD G. CHANDLER, WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF REVENUE;ET AL., RESPONDENTS
Witness
No. 1 Written Testimony - Writer Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall - dated, May 21,
2014 11:26 PM { Update Information : Writer Barnewall (Please Listen to Below-mentioned
WAV attachment, as Ms. Barnewall's name is clearly mentioned; denys that Former
South Dakota Senator Sheldon R. Songstad offered her personally USDollars 1.2
Billion for her contribution in writing " Wanta! Black Swan, White Hat "
- She states it was USDollars 1.0 Billion only.}
~~~~~~~ "
that the Supreme Court Solicitor General from 2001 - 2004, Ted Olson, had
diverted his (Wanta's) Supreme Court Appeal when it was filed in 2003. .....
Back to
Solicitor General Ted Olson : Interestingly,
I talked with a man [ and tape recorded the entire conversation of Philip
X. Wainright (U.S.N.R.) with the writer of Wanta! Black Swan, White Hat
(Amazon.com)] who provided a great deal on information to Claire Sterling
when she wrote her book, Thieves' World (Simon & Schuster, 1994).
He says
the manuscript was changed by the publisher from the original one written by
Sterling and submitted to the publisher. " She wrote positive things about
Leo Wanta and his efforts in Russia," he told me. When I pointed out to
him that in her book Sterling had called Wanta a " snake oil
salesman," and some other choice negatives, he informed me that an editor
(he provided his name) at Simon & Schuster had made changes of substance to
the text. He also provided the name of an Assistant FBI Director - " Jim
Moody " who had positioned himself as " Sterling's "Mr. X "
in the book and who had received a hefty pay off by Simon & Schuster.
"Mr.
X " was an important character in that portion of Thieves' World that
dealt with Leo Wanta, the Soviet Union / Russian Cold War (Evil Empire)
situation and focused on the Soviet Mafiya. The gentleman with whom I spoke -
and he knew a great deal about what happened in the Soviet Union and about
Claire Sterling - identifies himself as "Mr. X." ..... One of the
side remarks he made when we exchanged comments was that Ted Olson had followed
him around Atlanta, that he was a very nasty person, and at one time Olson has
used the name " Rick Reynolds, " a name given exclusively to Secret
Agent Leo Emil Wanta (Totten Doctrine - SA233MS) by President Ronald Reagan.
That bit of information certainly made me wonder who else might have used the
intelligence names bestowed upon Leo Wanta ... and what might they have done
using his undercover names?"" There is no doubt that Mr. Olson was in
a position to divert the Wanta Supreme Court Appeal... and because of his
affiliation with President Reagan's office, there is no doubt he knew who Leo
Wanta is. There is also no doubt that he is part of the Bush
'family.""Unfortunately for the perpetrators, the Supreme Court Case
Number assigned by the Court to the Wanta case conflicts with a case involving
another individual - someone of whom Ambassador Wanta has never heard of. In
essence, two case numbers attached to the Wanta Appeal on the Supreme Court's
own Web pages. Case No. 02-1363 and #02-1544. There should not be two case
numbers assigned to a single appeal. Yet, #02-1544 is listed in the Court's own
records when I found Case #02-1363 ... a big clue that something was wrong with
this filing. Another clue that something is wrong: the Court's Decision went
beyond the time limit allowed for its response.""Supreme Court Chief
Justice John G. Roberts was (and is still) a material witness on behalf of
United States Secret Agent Leo/Lee Emil Wanta. And a strange thing happened on
the way to the Forum, Brutus - I mean on the way to the Supreme
Court.""The Supreme Court Appeal was filed by Ambassador Leo Emil
Wanta, Plaintiff, vs. Secretary Richard G. Chandler, Wisconsin Department of
Revenue, et al. There are others parties listed as Respondents and the include
James E. Doyle, Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, Douglas Haag,
former Assistant Attorney General of the State of Wisconsin, Grant C. Johnson,
United States Attorney for the Western District of Wisconsin, Jack C. Voight,
Wisconsin State Treasurer, Judith Coleman, Clerk of the Dane County Circuit
Court in Wisconsin, United States Attorney General John Ashcroft, and United
States Treasury Secretary Paul H. O'Neill.""There are some questions
that need to be answered regarding Case No. 02-1363 ... the Certiorari.1. Did
Chief Justice Roberts acknowledge his working and Presidential relationships
established when he worked as legal counsel for President Reagan at the White
House? Those relationships involved Secret Agent Leo Emil Wanta and are
documented by the Reagan Library. The documents at the Reagan Library include
two notes to White House Chief Counsel Fred Fielding regarding Leo Wanta
(5/301984) and other correspondence involving secret agent Leo E. Wanta on May
29, 1984, May 31, 1984, etc. The files released by the Library include F06-007
and F05-139/01. There are others dealing with Wanta's suggested appointment as
Inspector General at the Department of Defense, correspondence to now Supreme
Court Chief Justice John Roberts about Leo Wanta from the President's office,
etc.2. Did Chief Justice Roberts recuse himself from the Decision the Supremes
now say was made during their Judicial Conference of May 2003?I, personally,
will probably never believe the Supreme Court made this Decision in May of
2003. I believe a Decision had to be made before information regarding the
Protocols could be presented to the Supremes and I believe the Wanta Appeal was
hidden and not presented to the Court in 2003.The Petition was denied - but
that's not the important thing. Take a look at the Title in the actual
document. "Leo Wanta, Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland
...">>>>Tuesday, April 9, 2013 2:56 AMSupreme Court Plunk
02-1544 - Wanta 02-1544???From : "Marilyn Barnewall"To : "
Ambassador Leo Wanta "No. 02-1544Status :DECIDEDTitle:Gerald Frank Plunk,
Petitionerv.United StatesDocketed:Lower Ct:United States Court of Appeals for
the Ninth CircuitApril 24, 2003Search Results: Docket for
02-1363<>http://www.supremecourt.gov/Search.aspx?FileName=/docketfiles/02-1363.htmTitle:Leo Wanta, Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland, aka Lee E. Wanta, Petitioner
v. Richard G. Chandler, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Revenue, et al.No.
02-1363 02-1544)QUOTE - End of Witness No. 1 Written Testimony - Writer Marilyn
MacGruder Barnewall
Subject: ISA_ US Code – Chapter 11 – Part 1 – Title 18 USC Section
201>>>
Tuesday,
April 9, 2013 2:56 AM
Supreme
Court Plunk 02-1544 – Wanta 02-1544???
>From : “Marilyn Barnewall”
To : ” Ambassador Leo Wanta ”
No. 02-1544
Status : DECIDED
Title: Gerald Frank Plunk, Petitioner v. United States
Docketed:
Lower Ct:
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
April 24, 2003
Search Results: Docket for 02-1363
Title: Leo
Wanta, Somalia Ambassador to Canada and Switzerland, aka Lee E. Wanta,
Petitioner v. Richard G. Chandler, Secretary, Wisconsin Department of Revenue,
et al.
No. 02-1363 02-1544)
QUOTE – End
of Witness No. 1 – Writer Marilyn MacGruder Barnewall
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
DUTY, HONOR and COUNTRY – w / Calm and American Courage Forever and a Day
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
18 U.S.C. § 201 : US Code – Section 201: Bribery of public officials and
witnesses
(a) For the
purpose of this section –
(1) the term “public official” means Member of Congress, Delegate, or Resident
Commissioner, either before or after such official has qualified, or an officer
or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States, or any
department, agency or branch of Government thereof, including the District of
Columbia, in any official function, under or by authority of any such
department, agency, or branch of Government, or a juror;
(2) the term “person who has been selected to be a public official” means any
person who has been nominated or appointed to be a public official, or has been
officially informed that such person will be so nominated or appointed; and
(3) the term “official act” means any decision or action on any question,
matter, cause, suit, proceeding or controversy, which may at any time be
pending, or which may by law be brought before any public official, in such
official’s official capacity, or in such official’s place of trust or profit.
(b) Whoever – (1) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers or promises
anything of value to any public official or person who has been selected to be
a public official, or offers or promises any public official or any person who
has been selected to be a public official to give anything of value to any
other person or entity, with intent –
(A) to influence any official act; or
(B) to influence such public official or person who has been selected to be a
public official to commit or aid in committing, or collude in, or allow, any
fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the United
States; or
(C) to induce such public official or such person who has been selected to be a
public official to do or omit to do any act in violation of the lawful duty of
such official or person; (
2) being a public official or person selected to be a public official, directly
or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to
receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other person or
entity, in return for: (A) being influenced in the performance of any official
act;
(B) being influenced to commit or aid in committing, or to collude in, or
allow, any fraud, or make opportunity for the commission of any fraud, on the
United States; or
(C) being induced to do or omit to do any act in violation of the official duty
of such official or person;
(3) directly or indirectly, corruptly gives, offers, or promises anything of
value to any person, or offers or promises such person to give anything of
value to any other person or entity, with intent to influence the testimony
under oath or affirmation of such first-mentioned person as a witness upon a
trial, hearing, or other proceeding, before any court, any committee of either
House or both Houses of Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized
by the laws of the United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or with
intent to influence such person to absent himself therefrom;
(4) directly or indirectly, corruptly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or
agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally or for any other
person or entity in return for being influenced in testimony under oath or
affirmation as a witness upon any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or
in return for absenting himself therefrom; shall be fined under this title or
not more than three times the monetary equivalent of the thing of value,
whichever is greater, or imprisoned for not more than fifteen years, or both,
and may be disqualified from holding any office of honor, trust, or profit
under the United States.
(c) Whoever – (1) otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of
official duty –
(A) directly or indirectly gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any
public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public
official, for or because of any official act performed or to be performed by
such public official, former public official, or person selected to be a public
official; or
(B) being a public official, former public official, or person selected to be a
public official, otherwise than as provided by law for the proper discharge of
official duty, directly or indirectly demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or
agrees to receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of any
official act performed or to be performed by such official or person; (
2) directly or indirectly, gives, offers, or promises anything of value to any
person, for or because of the testimony under oath or affirmation given or to
be given by such person as a witness upon a trial, hearing, or other
proceeding, before any court, any committee of either House or both Houses of
Congress, or any agency, commission, or officer authorized by the laws of the
United States to hear evidence or take testimony, or for or because of such
person’s absence therefrom;
(3) directly or indirectly, demands, seeks, receives, accepts, or agrees to
receive or accept anything of value personally for or because of the testimony
under oath or affirmation given or to be given by such person as a witness upon
any such trial, hearing, or other proceeding, or for or because of such
person’s absence therefrom; shall be fined under this title or imprisoned for
not more than two years, or both.
(d) Paragraphs (3) and (4) of subsection (b) and paragraphs (2) and (3) of
subsection
(c) shall not be construed to prohibit the payment or receipt of witness fees
provided by law, or the payment, by the party upon whose behalf a witness is
called and receipt by a witness, of the reasonable cost of travel and
subsistence incurred and the reasonable value of time lost in attendance at any
such trial, hearing, or proceeding, or in the case of expert witnesses, a reasonable fee
for time spent in the preparation of such opinion, and in appearing and
testifying.
(e) The offenses and penalties prescribed in this section are separate from and
in addition to those prescribed in sections 1503, 1504, and 1505 of this title.
– See more at:
http://codes.lp.findlaw.com/uscode/18/I/11/201#sthash.Lqlu70PD.dpuf
cc: Veterans
Today – Lee E Wanta
Bureau Chief / Editor
A – 1010 Vienna< Austria – Editor
cc: Kenneth
Starr, Esq., et al
. . .
