RECORD US FARMERS SWITCHING (back) TO NON-GMO CROPS

RECORD US FARMERS SWITCHING TO NON-GMO CROPS IN 2015

CONTINUE TO VOTE WITH YOUR DOLLAR!

“Non-GMO is More Profitable” This is the rising sentiment among farmers of the US as a confluence of factors urges them to become pro-organic. From falling GMO grain prices to a rising tide of public distrust of genetically modified ingredients, failing GMO traits, higher GMO seed prices, and the premium prices that people willingly pay for quality food over toxic junk, the conventional farmer is changing his tune when it comes to Big Ag practices. Even if profit is the cornerstone on which this change is based, it is still telling. After all, experts project over $35 billion in sales for organic, non-GMO foods in 2015, and as GMO corn, soy and other GM grain prices rise, along with the costs to grow them (associated with more pesticide and herbicide use to control super weeds, for example) farmers are looking past the GMO propaganda which promised higher yields and more cash for farmers who grew their poison crops. This phenomenon is explained clearly in “The Genetic Engineering of Food and the Failure of Science” (full text available for download here) published in The International Journal of Sociology of Agriculture and Food. Gilbert Hostetler, president of Illinois-based Prairie Hybrids commented: “Our non-GMO seed sales are significantly higher than last year.” Mac Ehrhardt, president of Minnesota-based Albert Lea Seed, reports that he is selling more conventional (he describes conventional corn as non-GMO) corn seed by the end of November than he did all of last year. He says that farmers are turning to non-GMO to cut costs and to earn more money for their non-GMO yields. Ehrhardt says: “There is a continued increased demand for non-GMO." His observations are corroborated by Wayne Hoener, vice president of sales for eMerge, an Iowa-based seed company, as well as Tim Daley, an agronomist at Stonebridge, Ltd., an Iowa-based buyer of non-GMO soybeans who are also seeing a marked demand for non-GMO seed by farmers. Daley says: “Some companies have seen a 50 percent increase in sales of non GMO seed, and some have said they’ve sold more non-GMO seed this year than in the last five.” Oddly, Morrie Bryant, senior marketing manager at Pioneer Hi-Bred, which sells non-GMO corn and soybean seeds but sells more GMO seeds says he doesn’t see a big difference. “On (non-GMO) corn, we’ve got a slight increase on sales over last year,” he says. “Non-GMO has emerged as the new niche. It’s about 4-5 percent of total corn production.” If consumer demand for organic is any indication, farmers would be smart to step up their organic seed purchasing, and ditch Monsanto, Dow and Syngenta seeds completely. Non-GMO Economics Farmers find non-GMO seed appealing this year for several reasons, but mostly economics. Grain prices are low with corn selling at about $4 per bushel and soybeans aren’t going for much higher at around $10. Conversely, a premium is being shelled out for non-GMO corn and soybeans. “(Non-GMO) seed costs less, and there are premiums for non-GMO corn and soybeans in some areas,” Daley says. "Some farmers don’t want to pay technology fees (for GMO seeds) and non-GMO gives them a marketing opportunity,” Bryant says. Failing GMO Crops Other farmers are considering the switch because they are tired of super-weeds. One corn breeder who preferred to remain anonymous for a recent interview stated: “The insect and herbicide traits are losing effectiveness with increased resistant rootworm and weed species. Growers are tired of paying for input costs that are reduced in efficacy and funding additional forms of crop protection.” Iowa State University weed specialist Bob Hartzler seconds that sentiment in an interview with Iowa Farmer Today. “You have people questioning the value of the Roundup gene. How many are doing it (making the switch) because of that concern, I don’t know.” Non-GMO Outperform GMO Seeds http://www.infowars.com/record-us-farmers-switching-to-non-gmo-crops-in-2015

What's getting set to Happen in the Middle East

Intel From Israel on What's getting set to Happen in the Middle East

Received tonight from a friend:

"My brother and his family live in Jerusalem - he is a minister - his office is close to one of Israel 's largest underground military bases.

He called me last night which is very unusual - usually it is email.

He called to tell me that he is sending his family back to the US immediately due to what he is seeing happen within the last week and what he is being told by his military contacts in both the Israel and US military.

He said he is seeing with his own eyes military movements the likes of which he has never seen in his 20+ years in Israel.

What he called a massive redeployment and protective tactics of forces is underway.

Over the last two days he has seen anti-aircraft missile deployments throughout the Jerusalem area, including 3 mobile units that he can see from his office windows.

In addition, he has seen very large Israeli armored columns moving fast toward the Sinia where Egypt has now moved in armor.

There are reports of the top military leaders meeting with Israel 's Sr. Rabbi which is something that has happened preceding every prior military campaign.

His admonition is to watch carefully and pray for Israel and its people.

He is convinced that, barring something extraordinary, Israel will attack Iran - with or without the US - and very soon.

It is the belief in Israel that Obama does not stand with Israel but with the Arab countries.

He has told me before that Israel will saber rattle from time to time but that this time is very different from what he is seeing and hearing.

He was at the Wailing Wall 2 days ago and there were hundreds of IDF soldiers there.

As he was leaving, he passed at least 20 military buses full of soldiers en route to the wall.

He has never seen this before, either.

Just thought I would pass this along.

My brother is not an alarmist by any means.

When he talks like this, it gets my attention for sure and usually I find he knows more than he shares.

There are reports that Israel is asking Obama to come to Israel immediately but they are being answered with silence.

My opinion is that I see the making of the perfect storm."

The Programming Of Society To Reject Those Who Question - "Conspiracy Theorists'

The Programming Of Society To Reject Those Who Question

February 25, 2015  

                  

The society we have existed in has been conditioned very effectively to marginalize any that question the government.

No matter how big and glaring the lies are from the criminal cabal that runs our country and the planet, most citizens still do not wish to stand out from "the herd." Their programming is for the moment too strong for them to overcome.

As George Bush so clearly said "Either you are with us, or you are with the terrorists."

Such a statement has a tremendous impact on many people both consciously and unconsciously.

Only when unimaginable challenges are forced upon populations and comfort zones are shattered can the programming be broken.

Such conditions are unfolding now by the day.

When a critical mass of the population fully realize what is unfolding and what has been done to them, our paradigm will overturn.

The article below is historical documentation of the intentional mental conditioning of US populations to reject those who have the courage to question.

Dane Wigington
geoengineeringwatch.org       

In 1967, the CIA Created the Label "Conspiracy Theorists" ... to Attack Anyone Who Challenges the "Official" Narrative

  Submitted by George Washington on 02/23/2015

Conspiracy Theorists USED TO Be Accepted As Normal

Democracy and free market capitalism were founded on conspiracy theories.
The Magna Carta, the Constitution and Declaration of Independence and other  founding Western documents were based on conspiracy theories. Greek democracy and free market capitalism were also based on conspiracy theories.  But those were the bad old days …Things have now changed.

The CIA Coined the Term Conspiracy Theorist In 1967

That all changed in the 1960s.


Specifically, in April 1967, the CIA wrote a dispatch which coined the term “conspiracy theories” … and recommended methods for discrediting such theories.  The dispatch was marked “psych” –  short for “psychological operations” or disinformation –  and “CS” for the CIA’s “Clandestine Services” unit.


The dispatch was produced in responses to a Freedom of Information Act request by the New York Times in 1976.


The dispatch states:

2. This trend of opinion is a matter of concern to the U.S. government, including our organization.
 
***
 
The aim of this dispatch is to provide material countering and discrediting the claims of the conspiracy theorists, so as to inhibit the circulation of such claims in other countries. Background information is supplied in a classified section and in a number of unclassified attachments.
 
3. Action. We do not recommend that discussion of the [conspiracy] question be initiated where it is not already taking place. Where discussion is active addresses are requested:

a. To discuss the publicity problem with and friendly elite contacts (especially politicians and editors) , pointing out that the [official investigation of the relevant event] made as thorough an investigation as humanly possible, that the charges of the critics are without serious foundation, and that further speculative discussion only plays into the hands of the opposition. Point out also that parts of the conspiracy talk appear to be deliberately generated by …  propagandists. Urge them to use their influence to discourage unfounded and irresponsible speculation.

 
b. To employ propaganda assets to and refute the attacks of the critics. Book reviews and feature articles are particularly appropriate for this purpose. The unclassified attachments to this guidance should provide useful background material for passing to assets. Our ploy should point out, as applicable, that the critics are (I) wedded to theories adopted before the evidence was in, (II) politically interested, (III) financially interested, (IV) hasty and inaccurate in their research, or (V) infatuated with their own theories.
 
***
 
4. In private to media discussions not directed at any particular writer, or in attacking publications which may be yet forthcoming, the following arguments should be useful:
 
a. No significant new evidence has emerged which the Commission did not consider.
 
***
 
b. Critics usually overvalue particular items and ignore others. They tend to place more emphasis on the recollections of individual witnesses (which are less reliable and more divergent–and hence offer more hand-holds for criticism) …
 
***
 
c. Conspiracy on the large scale often suggested would be impossible to conceal in the United States, esp. since informants could expect to receive large royalties, etc.
 
***
 
d. Critics have often been enticed by a form of intellectual pride: they light on some theory and fall in love with it; they also scoff at the Commission because it did not always answer every question with a flat decision one way or the other.
 
***
 
f. As to charges that the Commission’s report was a rush job, it emerged three months after the deadline originally set. But to the degree that the Commission tried to speed up its reporting, this was largely due to the pressure of irresponsible speculation already appearing, in some cases coming from the same critics who, refusing to admit their errors, are now putting out new criticisms.
 
g. Such vague accusations as that “more than ten people have died mysteriously” can always be explained in some natural way ….
 
5. Where possible, counter speculation by encouraging reference to the Commission’s Report itself. Open-minded foreign readers should still be impressed by the care, thoroughness, objectivity and speed with which the Commission worked. Reviewers of other books might be encouraged to add to their account the idea that, checking back with the report itself, they found it far superior to the work of its critics.


Here are screenshots of part of the memo:


   

Summarizing the tactics which the CIA dispatch recommended:

• Claim that it would be impossible for so many people would keep quiet about such a big conspiracy

• Have people friendly to the CIA attack the claims, and point back to “official” reports

• Claim that eyewitness testimony is unreliable

• Claim that this is all old news, as “no significant new evidence has emerged”

• Ignore conspiracy claims unless discussion about them is already too active

• Claim that it’s irresponsible to speculate

• Accuse theorists of being wedded to and infatuated with their theories

• Accuse theorists of being politically motivated

• Accuse theorists of having financial interests in promoting conspiracy theories

In other words, the CIA’s clandestine services unit created the arguments for attacking conspiracy theories as unreliable in the 1960s as part of its psychological warfare operations.

But Aren’t Conspiracy Theories – In Fact – Nuts?

Forget Western history and CIA dispatches … aren’t conspiracy theorists nutty?
In fact, conspiracies are so common that judges are trained to look at conspiracy allegations as just another legal claim to be disproven or proven based on the specific evidence:

Federal and all 50 state’s codes include specific statutes addressing conspiracy, and providing the punishment for people who commit conspiracies.
 
But let’s examine what the people trained to weigh evidence and reach conclusions think about “conspiracies”. Let’s look at what American judges think.
 
Searching Westlaw, one of the 2 primary legal research networks which attorneys and judges use to research the law, I searched for court decisions including the word “Conspiracy”. This is such a common term in lawsuits that it overwhelmed Westlaw.
 
Specifically, I got the following message:

“Your query has been intercepted because it may retrieve a large number of documents.”

From experience, I know that this means that there were potentially millions or many hundreds of thousands of cases which use the term. There were so many cases, that Westlaw could not even start processing the request.
 
So I searched again, using the phrase “Guilty of Conspiracy”. I hoped that this would not only narrow my search sufficiently that Westlaw could handle it, but would give me cases where the judge actually found the defendant guilty of a conspiracy. This pulled up exactly 10,000 cases — which is the maximum number of results which Westlaw can give at one time. In other words, there were more than 10,000 cases using the phrase “Guilty of Conspiracy” (maybe there’s a way to change my settings to get more than 10,000 results, but I haven’t found it yet).
 
Moreover, as any attorney can confirm, usually only appeal court decisions are published in the Westlaw database. In other words, trial court decisions are rarely published; the only decisions normally published are those of the courts which hear appeals of the trial. Because only a very small fraction of the cases which go to trial are appealed, this logically means that the number of guilty verdicts in conspiracy cases at trial must be much, much larger than 10,000.
 
Moreover, “Guilty of Conspiracy” is only one of many possible search phrases to use to find cases where the defendant was found guilty of a lawsuit for conspiracy. Searching on Google, I got 3,170,000 results (as of yesterday) under the term “Guilty of Conspiracy”, 669,000 results for the search term “Convictions for Conspiracy”, and 743,000 results for “Convicted for Conspiracy”.
 
Of course, many types of conspiracies are called other things altogether. For example, a long-accepted legal doctrine makes it illegal for two or more companies to conspire to fix prices, which is called “Price Fixing” (1,180,000 results).
 
Given the above, I would extrapolate that there have been hundreds of thousands of convictions for criminal or civil conspiracy in the United States.
 
Finally, many crimes go unreported or unsolved, and the perpetrators are never caught. Therefore, the actual number of conspiracies committed in the U.S. must be even higher.
 
In other words, conspiracies are committed all the time in the U.S., and many of the conspirators are caught and found guilty by American courts. Remember, Bernie Madoff’s Ponzi scheme was a conspiracy theory.
 
Indeed, conspiracy is a very well-recognized crime in American law, taught to every first-year law school student as part of their basic curriculum. Telling a judge that someone has a “conspiracy theory” would be like telling him that someone is claiming that he trespassed on their property, or committed assault, or stole his car. It is a fundamental legal concept.
 
Obviously, many conspiracy allegations are false (if you see a judge at a dinner party, ask him to tell you some of the crazy conspiracy allegations which were made in his court). Obviously, people will either win or lose in court depending on whether or not they can prove their claim with the available evidence. But not all allegations of trespass, assault, or theft are true, either.
 
Proving a claim of conspiracy is no different from proving any other legal claim, and the mere label “conspiracy” is taken no less seriously by judges.

It’s not only Madoff. The heads of Enron were found guilty of conspiracy, as was the head of Adelphia. Numerous lower-level government officials have been found guilty of conspiracy. See this, this, this, this and this.
Time Magazine’s financial columnist Justin Fox writes:

Some financial market conspiracies are real …
 
Most good investigative reporters are conspiracy theorists, by the way.

And what about the NSA and the tech companies that have cooperated with them?

But Our Leaders Wouldn’t Do That

While people might admit that corporate executives and low-level government officials might have engaged in conspiracies – they may be strongly opposed to considering that the wealthiest or most powerful might possibly have done so.
But powerful insiders have long admitted to conspiracies. For example, Obama’s Administrator of the Office of Information and Regulatory Affairs, Cass Sunstein, wrote:

Of course some conspiracy theories, under our definition, have turned out to be true. The Watergate hotel room used by Democratic National Committee was, in fact, bugged by Republican officials, operating at the behest of the White House. In the 1950s, the Central Intelligence Agency did, in fact, administer LSD and related drugs under Project MKULTRA, in an effort to investigate the possibility of “mind control.” Operation Northwoods, a rumored plan by the Department of Defense to simulate acts of terrorism and to blame them on Cuba, really was proposed by high-level officials ….

But Someone Would Have Spilled the Beans

A common defense to people trying sidetrack investigations into potential conspiracies is to say that “someone would have spilled the beans” if there were really a conspiracy.
But famed whistleblower Daniel Ellsberg explains:

It is a commonplace that “you can’t keep secrets in Washington” or “in a democracy, no matter how sensitive the secret, you’re likely to read it the next day in the New York Times.” These truisms are flatly false. They are in fact cover stories, ways of flattering and misleading journalists and their readers, part of the process of keeping secrets well. Of course eventually many secrets do get out that wouldn’t in a fully totalitarian society. But the fact is that the overwhelming majority of secrets do not leak to the American public. This is true even when the information withheld is well known to an enemy and when it is clearly essential to the functioning of the congressional war power and to any democratic control of foreign policy. The reality unknown to the public and to most members of Congress and the press is that secrets that would be of the greatest import to many of them can be kept from them reliably for decades by the executive branch, even though they are known to thousands of insiders.

History proves Ellsberg right. For example:

• One hundred and thirty thousand (130,000) people from the U.S., UK and Canada worked on the Manhattan Project. But it was kept secret for years

• A BBC documentary shows that:

There was “a planned coup in the USA in 1933 by a group of right-wing American businessmen . . . . The coup was aimed at toppling President Franklin D Roosevelt with the help of half-a-million war veterans. The plotters, who were alleged to involve some of the most famous families in America, (owners of Heinz, Birds Eye, Goodtea, Maxwell Hse & George Bush’s Grandfather, Prescott) believed that their country should adopt the policies of Hitler and Mussolini to beat the great depression”

Moreover, “the tycoons told General Butler the American people would accept the new government because they controlled all the newspapers.” Have you ever heard of this conspiracy before? It was certainly a very large one. And if the conspirators controlled the newspapers then, how much worse is it today with media consolidation?

• 7 out of the 8 giant, money center banks went bankrupt in the 1980′s during the “Latin American Crisis”, and the government’s response was to cover up their insolvency. That’s a cover up lasting several decades

• Banks have been involved in systematic criminal behavior, and have manipulated every single market

• Governments have been covering up nuclear meltdowns for fifty years to protect the nuclear industry. Governments have colluded to cover up the severity of numerous other environmental accidents. For many years, Texas officials intentionally under-reported the amount of radiation in drinking water to avoid having to report violations

• The government’s spying on Americans began before 9/11 (confirmed here and here. And see this.) But the public didn’t learn about it until many years later. Indeed, the the New York Times delayed the story so that it would not affect the outcome of the 2004 presidential election

• The decision to launch the Iraq war was made before 9/11. Indeed, former CIA director George Tenet said that the White House wanted to invade Iraq long before 9/11, and inserted “crap” in its justifications for invading Iraq. Former Treasury Secretary Paul O’Neill – who sat on the National Security Council – also says that Bush planned the Iraq war before 9/11. And top British officials say that the U.S. discussed Iraq regime change one month after Bush took office. Dick Cheney apparently even made Iraqi’s oil fields a national security priority before 9/11. And it has now been shown that a handful of people were responsible for willfully ignoring the evidence that Iraq lacked weapons of mass destruction. These facts have only been publicly disclosed recently. Indeed, Tom Brokaw said, “All wars are based on propaganda.” A concerted effort to produce propaganda is a conspiracy

Moreover, high-level government officials and insiders have admitted to dramatic conspiracies after the fact, including:

• Supporting terrorists to promote geopolitical goals

• Supporting false flag terror

The admissions did not occur until many decades after the events.
These examples show that it is possible to keep conspiracies secret for a long time, without anyone “spilling the beans”.


In addition, to anyone who knows how covert military operations work, it is obvious that segmentation on a “need-to-know basis”, along with deference to command hierarchy, means that a couple of top dogs can call the shots and most people helping won’t even know the big picture at the time they are participating.


Moreover, those who think that co-conspirators will brag about their deeds forget that people in the military or intelligence or who have huge sums of money on the line can be very disciplined. They are not likely to go to the bar and spill the beans like a down-on-their-luck, second-rate alcoholic robber might do.


Finally, people who carry out covert operations may do so for ideological reasons — believing that the “ends justify the means”. Never underestimate the conviction of an ideologue.

Conclusion

The bottom line is that some conspiracy claims are nutty and some are true. Each has to be judged on its own facts.
Humans have a tendency to try to explain random events through seeing patterns … that’s how our brains our wired. Therefore, we have to test our theories of connection and causality against the cold, hard facts.
On the other hand, the old saying by Lord Acton is true:

Power tends to corrupt, and absolute power tends to corrupt absolutely.

Those who operate without checks and balances – and without the disinfectant sunlight of public scrutiny and accountability – tend to act in their own best interests … and the little guy gets hurt.


The early Greeks knew it, as did those who forced the king to sign the Magna Carta, the Founding Fathers and the father of modern economics. We should remember this important tradition of Western civilization.


Postscript: The ridicule of all conspiracy theories is really just an attempt to diffuse criticism of the powerful.


The wealthy are not worse than other people … but they are not necessarily better either. Powerful leaders may not be bad people … or they could be sociopaths.


We must judge each by his or her actions, and not by preconceived stereotypes that they are all saints acting in our best interest or all scheming criminals.  And see ...


 http://www.zerohedge.com/news/2015-02-23/1967-he-cia-created-phrase-conspiracy-theorists-and-ways-attack-anyone-who-challenge


      

Fulford's full report: CIA PUT UNDER LOCKDOWN BY PENTAGON ...

The short blurb for this report was posted a few days ago. After allowing a few days embargo for the sake of his paying subscribers, here's Ben Fulford's complete report for this week as found here:

http://www.fourwinds10.net/siterun_data/government/fraud/us_government/news.php?q=1424714507

=====

The lunar year of the horse went out with a bang last week with an unprecedented Pentagon move to put CIA headquarters in Langley, Virginia under lockdown. The raid on the CIA was, “among other things” aimed at locating the three rogue nukes the Zionists have threatened to explode in the Ukraine, Pentagon sources say. Furthermore, the nuclear weapon headed for Stanlingrad (now Volvograd) has been seized by the Russians, the sources say.

There was also an explosion near an airport close to CIA headquarters in West Virginia last week. US corporate news outlets describe the explosion as the result of a “train derailment” but local residents said it resembled a nuclear explosion. Footage can be seen here:

http://www.cnn.com/videos/us/2015/02/16/tsr-west-virginia-train-derailment-explosion.cnn

We can only speculate that somebody trying to flee the raid on the CIA met with a fiery death.

The raid on the CIA came immediately after Ashton Carter was sworn in as the new US Defense Secretary. It did not go unnoticed that Carter was sworn in by Vice-President Joe Biden and not Barack Obama.

The Pentagon raid on the CIA was a condition for keeping the government in Washington D.C. afloat after a February 17th payment deadline, according to Chinese and European sources. The shut-down of US West Coast shipping has also now ended in response to the Pentagon move against the terrorist Bush CIA faction, the sources said.

The European and Chinese sources also say that 200 nations have now agreed to a new financial system and world peace. The Germans and the French together with their allies have joined the BRICS alliance, sources in both these countries say.

The Greeks and Germans have temporarily postponed their fight over Greek debt pending a visit to Japan in early March by German Chancellor Angela Merkel. She is expected to arrive around the same time as Michelle Obama.

The obstacle to world peace and prosperity is now, according to European and Chinese sources, the US East coast Zionist establishment, together with factions in London and the Vatican.

The opposition to world peace in Italy comes from the old Gladio network consisting of the Ndrangheta Mafiosi in cooperation with the Zionist ISIS Italian branch, according Italian P2 Freemason lodge MI5 sources.

In the UK it is Evelyn de Rothschild and his servants like Jeremy Heywood, David Cameron and Tony Blair who are the problem, according to MI5. There are moves being taken against this faction inside the UK. Sir Malcolm Rifkind MP (former Foreign Secretary) Chair of the Defense and Security committee in the House of Commons (a powerful committee overseeing the intelligence services), has been caught in sting operation by the Daily Telegraph selling his services for cash. Rifkin is part of the Zionist UK faction that has been beating the drums for war against Russia.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/politics/11429144/Cash-for-access-scandal-the-reaction.-Live.html?frame=3208834

In the United States, the Zionist controlled department of Homeland Security is unable to find funding for after February. So, it is threatening terror attacks against US and Canadian shopping malls, this time by “Somalian” terrorists.

This operation is being master-minded by former UK Prime Minister Tony Blair, according to MI5 sources. “Recent signs suggest that Blair (who is now in Belgrade, Serbia) will be behind an attack on London using the usual suspects,” and that Gnostic Illuminati Grandmaster Alexander Romanov will be framed or “at least implicated.”

Alexander Romanov showed up at this writer’s house last week battered and bruised. He said he spent the night evading 20 or more policemen who were trying to arrest him and take him to a mental hospital. He is now safe but his computer has been destroyed (yet again) and he will be laying low for a while.

According to Romanov, Russian President Vladimir Putin is the real grandmaster behind the 311 nuclear and tsunami terror attacks against Japan. However, it is hard to see a motive for Putin to do this and our own investigations point directly at Tony Blair, the Bushes, Rothschilds and other cabal families.

There have also been threats to stage a terrorist attack on Japan even bigger than 311. Recently people have been coming to this writer’s public speaking events and saying that the new year’s occult cover of the Economist magazine contained a threat against Japan.

The questioners, or should I say Rothschild agents, said the two arrows at the bottom right hand side of the cover picture with the numbers 115 and 113 meant that a new attack would take place on Japan on May 11th (511). The cover can be seen here:

http://vigilantcitizen.com/vigilantreport/economist-2015-cover-filled-cryptic-symbols-dire-predictions/

The same agents also said that a map of Japan minus the Kinki district (greater Osaka) was being shown at the Japanese freemason headquarters. The Economist is owned by the Cadbury, Rothschild, Schroder, Agnelli and other cabal families. They will be held accountable for any new atrocity.

Dr. Michael Van de Meer AKA Michael Meiring told this writer the 311 tsunami and nuclear terror attack against Japan that killed 20,000 innocent people was aimed at forcing the evacuation of 40 million people from greater Tokyo to North Korea where the Rothschilds would move their new Asian financial headquarters. This failed and now we know which families were behind that and many other horrific terror attacks. They will not be allowed to attack Osaka.

The North Korean faction that aided in the 311 attack against Japan has already been purged. The cabalist influence in Japan is now so low that cabal stooge Rabbi Abraham Cooper of the corrupted Simon Wiesenthal Center sent a Mossad agent to visit this writer and beg that Cooper not be put in jail because he “only banned one” of my books. The fact is Cooper is guilty of bribery, extortion and blackmail (at least) and belongs in jail together with many of his cohorts.

It should also be noted that an active campaign has ongoing in China to remove cabal linked tycoons from this world. In recent years 76 Chinese billionaires have died unnatural deaths, according to the China Daily. OF these 17 “committed suicide, 16 were murdered, 8 died in accidents, 16 were executed, and 19 died from illness (at the average age of 48). There are now only 152 Chinese billionaires left.

Chinese government sources say this is part of a purge of Maoists. Chairman Mao was the most senior cabal agent ever in China. All Chinese of influence connected to the Zionist Bush and other cabal Zionist faction families are targets of this purge, the source says.

For these reasons the Zionist cabalists are unlikely to be able to stage any more truly spectacular terror attacks in Asia.

Instead they have been reduced to making threats against Western shopping malls using the terror group “Al Shabaab” that staged the recent attack on the Westfield Shopping Center in Nairobi, Kenya. The Westfield shopping center was owned by Frank Lowy, an Australian Jew who is a close associate of Larry Silverstein of World Trade Center 911 fame. Silverstein and Lowy have made a fortune on “terrorist insurance” after 911 and after the Westfield incident.

Now this al- “Sham” baab is threatening the Westfield shopping center in London also owned by Lowy. The other mall they are threatening is the Mall of America owned by the Iranian Jewish Ghermezian family in Canada.

http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/terrorism-in-the-uk/11428309/Al-Shabaab-calls-for-attacks-on-Oxford-Street-and-Westfield-centres-in-new-terror-threat.html

Needless to say, with shopping malls suffering from the weak economy and competition from online retailing, from the owner’s point of view it would be a great time for “terrorist” insurance fraud.

And of course new terrorist attacks would be a great excuse to keep funding the Zionist Department of Homeland Security.

In any case, as large parts of Asia are on holiday this week, events are expected to slow down for now.

In March the ongoing campaign to finally break the back of the cabal once and for all is expected to resume in earnest. The year of the sheep will be one of payback time and justice for the sheeple.

-----

http://www.shiftfrequency.com/ben-fulford-feb-23-2015-cia-put-under-lockdown-but-cabal-resistance-pockets-still-remain-full-post/·

http://benjaminfulford.net/