Monday, April 27, 2015
War of Terror is a Reichstag Fire False Flag Operation
"Operations
in Iraq and Afghanistan and the war on terrorism have
reduced the pace of military transformation
and have revealed our lack of preparation for defensive and stability
operations.
This Administration has overextended our
military."Barack Obama
War of Terror is a Reichstag Fire False Flag Operation
By
now, you
are probably worn out from all the
speculation about the actual events in Pakistan that claim the death of
the public enemy
No 1. No photos of a dead Osama bin Laden,
burial at sea, instant DNA results and changing versions with every new
news report
gets old quickly. The claim that a treasure
chest of intelligence was secured during the raid, conflicts with
killing the
main man who knows where all the buried are
buried. Capturing him alive for interrogation would maximize the
intelligence
quest, if that were the real goal.
If any significance should be assigned to this account, now is the time to re-evaluate the entire nature of the War on Terror that has destroyed America more in the last ten years than any attack on home soil. Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden and al-Qaeda has always been a straw man villain that is necessary to perpetuate a never-ending threat to the eternal evil empire. Wag the dog is a standard policy to keep the drollery narrative going in order to maintain the dullard public in their drunken stupor of jingoism. The tale might seem amusing if the stark consequences of national decay and carnage were not real. The fantasy indoctrination that purports to be professional news journalism defies logic and common sense. Not surprising, the asinine flag wavers chant USA, USA, USA when the reality actually resembles an echo of Sieg Heil Amerika. The cry for justice always seems to falter when it comes to the underlying players in the terrorist war against the American people. Comments and conclusions from the site Universe CIA2 are germane.
If any significance should be assigned to this account, now is the time to re-evaluate the entire nature of the War on Terror that has destroyed America more in the last ten years than any attack on home soil. Osama bin Mohammed bin Awad bin Laden and al-Qaeda has always been a straw man villain that is necessary to perpetuate a never-ending threat to the eternal evil empire. Wag the dog is a standard policy to keep the drollery narrative going in order to maintain the dullard public in their drunken stupor of jingoism. The tale might seem amusing if the stark consequences of national decay and carnage were not real. The fantasy indoctrination that purports to be professional news journalism defies logic and common sense. Not surprising, the asinine flag wavers chant USA, USA, USA when the reality actually resembles an echo of Sieg Heil Amerika. The cry for justice always seems to falter when it comes to the underlying players in the terrorist war against the American people. Comments and conclusions from the site Universe CIA2 are germane.
"USA has become a Banana Republic since 2000, on par with the old Soviet Politburo, North Korea, Eric Honecker’s East Germany, Pravda, Tishreen, the 3rd Reich and Zimbabwe, to name a few. The crumbling Empire is too desperate and pulling all the Stops from its dirty bag of Tricks, and much more is in the Pipeline. The worst part is that ALL the Western world, the MSM, the UKUSA alliance of evils, the UN, NATO, EU, the Arab stooges & puppets, etc. are singing the same ZIOCON tunes, babbling, blathering, and regurgitating the same fallacies about 9/11, Al-CIAda and the bogus war on "terror".The pattern of false flags are rooted firmly in recent history and shared by delusory regimes.
1. In 1931 the Mukden incident was the pretext for annexing Manchuria
|
2. August 1939 the Gleiwitz incident and Operation Himmler used to fabricated evidence of a Polish attack against Germany
|
3. November 26, 1939 the Shelling of Mainila pretext of Soviet Union attack on Finland
|
4. In 1953 the Operation Ajax operations against the formerly democratically elected leader of Iran, Mohammed Mosaddeq
|
5. In 1954 the Lavon Affair, Israel sponsored bombings against US and UK interests in Cairo
|
6. In 1962 Operation Northwoods plot by the U.S. Department of Defense for a war with Cuba
|
7. In 1999 the Russian apartment bombings that precipitated the Second Chechen War were false flag operations
|
In
The Real Threat to
National Security, the dilemma of what to believe for a sincere American is presented.
"Is the threat from foreign terrorists the undertaking of homeland insecurity? The preoccupation since 911 with a self-serving "War of Terror" has been masked under the appearance of national security. Tracking down targeted Jihad terrorists and waging regional search and destroy missions has become the growth industry of the new millennium. The rationale and justification for such a protracted conflict rests upon a cowardly attack on American soil. If you listen to the official version of events anyone who questions the validity of blaming Islamic Fascists must be unpatriotic."
Written just after 911, The Empire Strikes
Back, Again cites the BBC reporting, Bin Laden's warning, "neither
the
United States nor he who lives in the United
States will enjoy security before we can see it as a reality in
Palestine and
before all the infidel armies leave the land
of Mohammed".
Finally, from What Is This War
About?, the source World Islamic Front
Statement - Jihad Against Jews and Crusaders - 23 February 1998, publishes Osama
Bin Laden's fatwa mission statement.
Osama
Bin Laden was
a CIA creation who came to oppose the
American imperium. If he did not exist, a substitute creation would be
necessary. The
Marxists that compose the Obama
administration have crossed a line of no return. The path they chartered
now demands a far
more dire level of apprehension for
increasingly doubtful, yet naive citizens to swallow and accept. Just
how destructive
will the next criminal psyops staged event
be? The war room of authoritarians, models their Stalinist hero’s
practices
of human butchery. They admire their British
communist "Cambridge Five" cousins who betrayed their own nation for the panacea of a global
paradise of central control. 1) For over seven years the United States has been occupying the lands of Islam in the holiest of places, the Arabian Peninsula, plundering its riches, dictating to its rulers, humiliating its people, terrorizing its neighbors, and turning its bases in the Peninsula into a spearhead through which to fight the neighboring Muslim peoples. If some people have in the past argued about the fact of the occupation, all the people of the Peninsula have now acknowledged it. The best proof of this is the Americans' continuing aggression against the Iraqi people using the Peninsula as a staging post, even though all its rulers are against their territories being used to that end, but they are helpless.
2) Despite the great devastation inflicted on the Iraqi people by the crusader-Zionist alliance, and despite the huge number of those killed, which has exceeded 1 million... despite all this, the Americans are once against trying to repeat the horrific massacres, as though they are not content with the protracted blockade imposed after the ferocious war or the fragmentation and devastation. So here they come to annihilate what is left of this people and to humiliate their Muslim neighbors.
3) If the Americans' aims behind these wars are religious and economic, the aim is also to serve the Jews' petty state and divert attention from its occupation of Jerusalem and murder of Muslims there. The best proof of this is their eagerness to destroy Iraq, the strongest neighboring Arab state, and their endeavor to fragment all the states of the region such as Iraq, Saudi Arabia, Egypt, and Sudan into paper statelets and through their disunion and weakness to guarantee Israel's survival and the continuation of the brutal crusade occupation of the Peninsula.
Bin Laden’s fatwa still rings true to Americans who despise the empire and love the principles of a lawful Republic limited in size, scope and reach.
The videos Guide for DUMMIES - CIA & Their Fake Osama Videos and Osama bin Laden is dead! He was killed by Omar Sheikh! Benazir Bhutto exposes the truth, illustrates that a bogyman can be even more useful, dead.
Never
noted for
a sophisticated perspective of their own
history, especially when it comes to the clandestine deeds of their own
government,
most folks want to trust their leaders. Remember the Maine and the Gulf of Tonkin incident both were the impetus for tragic and unnecessary wars. The sedated public,
eager to rally round the flag, is less inclined to recognize the bald face lies told to them from
every internationalist administration that occupied the White House. Justification
to continue an unwarranted war on terror is
so absurd on its face. Only a mercenary or a desperate idealist, who
refuses to
accept the overwhelming evidence, that a
global interventionist foreign policy
is the basic cause of our self-created insecurity. The internal ruling
establishment promotes and survives on the
terror of their making, against the citizens of this once great nation. You do not have to like or agree with the viewpoints and objectives that
bin Laden professed. However, you had better recognize that only a return to an America First foreign policy could serve the true security needs of our people.
What
will you do when the next internal false flag government
act of domestic violence comes to your
country? Will you bow down to the thugs that wheel unlawful authority,
or will you
revolt. If you really want justice for the
911 murders, you must face reality and look within your own government
for the
true terrorists.http://www.batr.org/wrack/050811.html
By order of the King, day care children shall drink less juice
Jonathan Benson
4/25/2015
Source …..
At the same time that some lawmakers in New York State are pushing to expand late-term abortions and allow anyone to murder unborn babies at any time during pregnancy by shooting poison directly into their hearts, the Empire Nanny State is attempting once again to ban more beverages from public consumption.
The New York City Board of Health has decreed that all licensed city day care facilities must now limit how much juice children are allowed to consume. According to reports, children at day care centers must be at least two years of age before they are allowed to drink any juice onsite. And for those two years of age or older, only four ounces per day of juice will be allowed.
And any old juice simply won’t do. Juice products spiked with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and other additives are prohibited, with only “100% juice” products allowed. Under the old rules, children as young as eight months old were allowed to drink up to six ounces of “100% juice” daily, but that will no longer be the case.
The new rules, which have been published in the city’s Health Code, are said to be in line with U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommendations that a majority of children’s recommended fruit intake come from whole fruit. Juice products, claim health authorities, are contributing to obesity and other chronic health problems in many of the same ways that soda pop beverages are.
This 30-minute-per-week limit on “sedentary” time will not include nap time or time spent reading, doing puzzles or painting, according to authorities. It will only restrict mind-numbing sedentary activities like TV-watching that have been scientifically shown to rot children’s brains and make them dumber, especially during their early developmental years.
Limiting children’s sugar intake and sedentary time is admittedly a positive thing, but should the government be in charge of mandating these requirements? Some New York City parents don’t think so, and they’ve been quick to denounce the move, likening it to ex-NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg’s nanny state restrictions on beverage sizes.
“It’s like the big soda ban under Bloomberg!” stated Brooklyn mom Victoria Clark to the New York Daily News. “TV can be educational, and not all juices are bad.”
Other parents, however, are supportive of the restrictions.
“I would never send my kid to a day care where they are watching TV,” commented Elizabeth Clements, a mother of three from TriBeCa, in support of the new rules.
According to an official notice published in the City Record, 15% of three-year-olds and 17% of four-year-olds from low-income families are now obese. Because of this, says the Board of Health, public health measures need to be taken to curb this epidemic and give the next generation a better chance at health and wellness.
“Dietary and lifestyle habits and preferences developed at a very early age can often persist and may have [a] profound impact on an individual’s health later on,” wrote the Board in the City Record.
Sources for this article include:
4/25/2015
Source …..
At the same time that some lawmakers in New York State are pushing to expand late-term abortions and allow anyone to murder unborn babies at any time during pregnancy by shooting poison directly into their hearts, the Empire Nanny State is attempting once again to ban more beverages from public consumption.
The New York City Board of Health has decreed that all licensed city day care facilities must now limit how much juice children are allowed to consume. According to reports, children at day care centers must be at least two years of age before they are allowed to drink any juice onsite. And for those two years of age or older, only four ounces per day of juice will be allowed.
And any old juice simply won’t do. Juice products spiked with high-fructose corn syrup (HFCS) and other additives are prohibited, with only “100% juice” products allowed. Under the old rules, children as young as eight months old were allowed to drink up to six ounces of “100% juice” daily, but that will no longer be the case.
The new rules, which have been published in the city’s Health Code, are said to be in line with U.S. Department of Agriculture (USDA) recommendations that a majority of children’s recommended fruit intake come from whole fruit. Juice products, claim health authorities, are contributing to obesity and other chronic health problems in many of the same ways that soda pop beverages are.
“Sedentary” time restricted to 30 minutes per week rather than 60 minutes per day
The rule changes also address the types of activities day care center children will be allowed to engage in on a daily basis. Rather than be allowed to spend up to an hour per day watching television and playing games on tablet devices, day care center children will now be restricted to only one half-hour of screen time per week.This 30-minute-per-week limit on “sedentary” time will not include nap time or time spent reading, doing puzzles or painting, according to authorities. It will only restrict mind-numbing sedentary activities like TV-watching that have been scientifically shown to rot children’s brains and make them dumber, especially during their early developmental years.
Limiting children’s sugar intake and sedentary time is admittedly a positive thing, but should the government be in charge of mandating these requirements? Some New York City parents don’t think so, and they’ve been quick to denounce the move, likening it to ex-NYC mayor Michael Bloomberg’s nanny state restrictions on beverage sizes.
“It’s like the big soda ban under Bloomberg!” stated Brooklyn mom Victoria Clark to the New York Daily News. “TV can be educational, and not all juices are bad.”
Other parents, however, are supportive of the restrictions.
“I would never send my kid to a day care where they are watching TV,” commented Elizabeth Clements, a mother of three from TriBeCa, in support of the new rules.
According to an official notice published in the City Record, 15% of three-year-olds and 17% of four-year-olds from low-income families are now obese. Because of this, says the Board of Health, public health measures need to be taken to curb this epidemic and give the next generation a better chance at health and wellness.
“Dietary and lifestyle habits and preferences developed at a very early age can often persist and may have [a] profound impact on an individual’s health later on,” wrote the Board in the City Record.
Sources for this article include:
GOVERNMENT DECLARES MARTIAL LAW
DEVELOPING: GOVERNMENT DECLARES MARTIAL LAW DURING COMMERCIAL..
Sunday, April 26, 2015 22:50
WARNING: THIS COULD UPSET YOU VERY DEEPLY!
THIS IS THE FIRST TIME I’VE EVER BEEN SCARED TO POST SOMETHING, BECAUSE SO MUCH IS UNFOLDING SO FAST I CAN BARELY KEEP UP WITH IT!
THE FOLLOWING IS AN AARP COMMERCIAL DECLARING MARTIAL LAW
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
>
By: Voice of Reason
“GOVERNMENT DECLARES MARTIAL LAW… THE PRESIDENT WANTS YOU TO REMAIN CALM….. AUTHORITIES CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE OUTBREAK…”
If you don’t have earplugs, the commercial replays with the audio boosted so you can hear it. It’s not through a bullhorn or anything, but you can hear it. There is no question it was intended to be subliminal. This is troubling on so many levels I don’t even know where to begin. First, this should be troubling to ANYONE for the simple reason that it exists. Let this help to remove ALL doubt about the articles you are seeing dealing with FEMA CAMPS and MARTIAL LAW TRAINING KNOWN AS “OPERATION JADE HELM.”
The second VERY disturbing point of interest, is the CONTENT of the message: “AUTHORITIES CONTINUE TO MONITOR THE OUTBREAK.” The logical question I found myself asking is, “What outbreak?” Then my eyes wandered down and I saw the DATE when the commercial was made and aired: 2014. Do you happen to recall what was going on in 2014? THAT WAS WHEN EBOLA WAS IN THE NEWS EVERYWHERE, and many many questions went unanswered. In the event you don’t recall, it was a strain of Ebola that was manufactured by the U.S. government and the military has the patent on. I am not suggesting I have the the answers to the questions I pose, however I am going to pose some questions, and draw your attention to stories that have been in the news recently, and YOU decide what you think is going on, or just HOW twisted this administration REALLY is.
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
In September of 2014, SHTF Plan.com’s Mac Slavo wrote GOVERNMENTS BUILDING EBOLA DETENTION CAMPS TO QUARANTINE THE INFECTED AND CALLING THEM “CARE CENTERS.” That post said the following:
Martial law, round ups of those suspected of being sick, and detentions in quarantine camps is the only option governments have left and similar strategies will be implemented in the United States if and when the virus starts popping up.
But Doctors Without Borders, the organization that spearheaded the treatment and containment efforts at the beginning of the crisis when governments were completely ignoring it, says that WHO’s efforts are destined to fail:
In July, the President amended an Executive Order giving the medical emergency responders the legal powers to identify and detain individuals suspected of carrying a communicable disease. And though it’s not talked about publicly, it is widely believed the the Department of Homeland Security and the Federal Emergency Management Agency have already pre-positioned domestic detention camps and CDC QUARANTINE CENTERS in the event of a national security emergency.
STAY WITH ME HERE… DOES ANYONE REMEMBER THESE STORIES I DID?
- FEMA Camps Have Begun: Homeless First!
- Utah FEMA Camps Secretly Exterminate Homeless
- Disturbing Find Reveals True Government Plan For Nation’s Homeless
MIGHT WE HAVE FOUND SOME OF THOSE PATIENTS REMAINS?
I’m not trying to scare anyone here, merely putting together pieces of a puzzle that was never finished now that we have some new clues. Back in July of 2014, OBAMA SIGNED EXECUTIVE ORDER 13295 TO ALLOW DETENTION OF AMERICANS WITH ‘RESPIRATORY ILLNESSES…’ a/k/a send them to a secret FEMA CAMPS! Shortly after that, in October of 2014, HHS DOCUMENTS REVEALED THAT PATIENTS EXPOSED TO EBOLA WERE TO BE SENT TO FEMA CAMPS. There were also REPORTS AT THAT TIME OF DOCTORS COMING FORWARD and saying their patients were DISAPPEARING without their knowledge, and the doctors were threatened with their medical licenses if they come forward with their stories…
Infowars reporter Paul Joseph Watson speaks with former Border Patrol Agent Zach Taylor as he breaks down how the CDC is working with Border Patrol authorities and the Department of Homeland Security to disappear potential Ebola victims attempting to cross the border into the United States.
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
IS IT POSSIBLE MARTIAL LAW IS COMING BECAUSE OF EBOLA?
As I have already mentioned in previous posts, Dave Hodges from the Common Sense Show the following LONG before people started POURING over the border:
I believe that it is possible, and even likely, that the FEMA camps will first be used to house the millions of millions of illegal aliens which will be coming to America under Obama’s new policies. This will legitimize the use and staffing of these new prisons. Take a guess as to who will subsequently be making reservations for your nearest FEMA camp?
Dave was SPOT ON about using the camps to house the illegals to break them in. You know what made that easy to predict if you know where to look? The camps have been around for YEARS… waiting… this year… 2014 WAS THE FIRST TIME THERE WAS FUNDING IN THE FEDERAL BUDGET FOR THEIR CONVERSION FROM DORMANT TO FULLY OPERATIONAL.
WE KNOW ALREADY KNOW FEMA CAMPS ARE EVERYWHERE!
FEMA camps are not new. The existence and operational activation of FEMA camps is now a provable fact as reported by CBS News. Let’s not kid ourselves, FEMA camps are future concentration camps, plain and simple. Concentration camps for who? U.S. Citizens. Political Dissidents. Those who won’t drink the Cool Aid. What else do we know? We know Obama has partnered with and/or been associated with various radical groups his WHOLE LIFE, and they have had plans to use the camps for decades. For what? TO KILL TENS OF MILLIONS WHO WILL NOT RENOUNCE CAPITALISM, AND ACCEPT A SOCIALIST DICTATORSHIP AS THE NEW NORM!
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
Within that post we learn the following:
RIGHT NOW, A MILITARY OPERATION IS TAKING PLACE IN 10 STATES!
ANY OTHER COUNTRY WOULD CALL THIS PRECISELY WHAT IT IS…
TRAINING FOR MARTIAL LAW!
In direct violation of THE POSSE COMITATUS ACT, which I cover in detail in my post titled, US ARMY HAS ADS ON THE INTERNET SEEKING INTERNMENT CAMP/RESETTLEMENT CAMP SPECIALISTS, “Operation Jade Helm” is an 8 week exercise being conducted by the United States military and the Interagency (IA) Unconventional Warfare (UW). PRE-OBAMA, Posse Comitatus has stood in this country as LAW for over 137 YEARS essentially FORBIDDING the use of the U.S. military to police it’s own citizens. “Hope & Change” took care of that!
Operation Jade Helm is designed to simulate a MILITARY RESPONSE to an UPRISING of the American people. Obama has known since Day 1 that his plans did not even RESEMBLE anything constitutional, and it is expected that eventually WE THE PEOPLE will SNAP and try to take our country back. When we do, Obama and the rest of Crime Inc. will be ready for us. Being the clever little sh** that he is, Obama duped the DEMOCRATS INTO NOT READING THE NATIONAL DEFENSE AUTHORIZATION ACT which essentially did away with Posse Comitatus AND did away with the ENTIRE BILL OF RIGHTS with the exception of the Second Amendment, and we all know how hard Obama is working on that one.
[Audio/Video below cannot be seen in Newsletter - have to go to Blog]
MAKE NO MISTAKE: OBAMA IS ABSOLUTELY COMING FOR THE GUNS!
WHAT EXACTLY IS “OPERATION JADE HELM” YOU ASK?
JADE HELM’S PURPOSE DEFINED:
“Jade Helm is a challenging eight-week joint military and Interagency (IA) Unconventional Warfare (UW) exercise conducted throughout Texas, New Mexico, Arizona, California, Nevada, Utah and Colorado.”
The term, “unconventional warfare (UW)” makes it clear that this exercise is not dealing with a Russian-backed “Red Dawn” invasion of the Southwestern United States by Russian backed Latin American partners. UW speaks to the guerrilla warfare (asymmetrical) nature of the anticipated and rehearsed conflict.
Subsequently, it can be conclusively stated that Jade Helm is not preparing for a Red Dawn invasion, rather, THEY ARE PREPARING FOR A RED, WHITE, AND BLUE INVASION. This is a MASSIVE REHEARSAL FOR MARTIAL LAW IMPLEMENTATION as well as implementing the proverbial and much rumored RED and BLUE LIST and the “SNATCH AND GRAB OF KEY RESISTANCE FIGURES” from the Independent Media as well as uncooperative political figures. The various provisions of Jade Helm make it clear just how dangerous this drill truly is.
Composition of Jade Helm Forces Reveals the True Purpose of the Drills
Thomas Mead, the operations planner for the U.S. Army’s Jade Helm realistic military training has publicly stated that “We have Army Green Berets, Navy Seals, Marine Special Operations Command, the 82nd Airborne Division and we also have some of our interagency partners such as the DEA, FBI and the Joint Personnel Recovery Agency (JPRA) that will be working with us.”
Baltimore Police Beat Journalist During Protest
Amanda Lee Myers
4/26/2015
J.M. Giordano, who works at the City Paper, says Baltimore police “swarmed over” him and hit him repeatedly. A video posted to the newspaper’s website Sunday shows at least two police officers in riot gear hitting and kicking Giordano as the person filming screams, “He’s a photographer! He’s press!”
Sait Serkan Gurbuz, a photographer with Reuters, says police detained him as he shot pictures of the scuffle. Reuters says Gurbuz was cited with failure to obey orders.
A Baltimore police spokesman hasn’t immediately commented.
Operation Opera II - Israeli Attack on Iran
5 Year old post~
The
worse kept secret is the joint plans
of Israel and their American stooges for a sneak attack on Iran.
Succumbing to the militaristic
legacy of imperial Japan, the joint
chiefs of staff are ready to facilitate or even lead a stealth charge
against purported
WMD targets. So what is their
rationale? Since the deadly weapon facilities could not be found in Iraq,
maybe they will be found in Iran? If Iran was ready to develop nuclear
weapons, how is that any different
from Israel already deploying 200
plus warheads? Especially since the Zionist belligerent is poised to
strike Iran in a repeat
of their “Operation Opera” against the Iraqi Osirak reactor in 1981.
In
the most delusional and warped minds of hardened Christian Zionist
supporters of the ultimate terrorist state,
Israel can do no wrong. How could
such an act of undeclared war benefit the American nation? The neocon
hijacking of an American
First foreign policy is the demented
legacy of the Bush presidencies. The Obama administration is no
different. The War Party
mindset remains the dominate force
that defends the Zionist rogue regime that is bent upon an apocalyptic
holocaust of their
own making.
“Clearly,
Israel will not make good on its
threats without a nod from Washington. And that is not there yet, at
least not officially.
After talks with Barak and Israel’s
military chief of staff Gabi Ashkenazi in Jerusalem, Sen. McCain
indicated the time
had not yet come. “I don’t believe
we are at the point of making that kind of decision, nor is the Israeli
government,”
he said, “given the state that Iran
is in now as far as the development of their nuclear weapons is
concerned.”
When asked by Fox News whether he
had discussed the military option with Obama, Netanyahu danced around
the issue, but reiterated
his conviction that Iran must be
made to fear such an option. And Obama? He coined a most curious
formulation, Israel’s
“unique security requirements,” and
pledged “unwavering … commitment to Israel’s security.”
When interviewed July 8 for the
first time on Israeli television, Obama indicated the two governments
would consult with one
another, not act unilaterally. “I
think the relationship between Israel and the U.S.,” he said, “is
sufficiently
strong that neither of us try to
surprise each other.”
An impending forecast from an unlikely confederation, Veteran Intelligence Professionals for Sanity (VIPS), offers up this warning to President Obama.
"Israel’s leaders would calculate that once the battle is joined, it will be politically untenable for you to give anything less than unstinting support to Israel, no matter how the war started, and that U.S. troops and weaponry would flow freely. Wider war could eventually result in destruction of the state of Israel.
The
likelihood is that a pre-emptive airstrike will be precipitated
by the Israeli demand that the full
support and might of the U.S. military be committed to the campaign.
VIPS concludes, “Sadly,
our former colleagues tell us that
politicization of intelligence analysis did not end with the departure
of Bush and Cheney…and
that the problem is acute even at
the State Department’s Bureau of Intelligence and Research, which in the
past has
done some of the best professional,
objective, tell-it-like-it-is analysis.” Such counsel goes unheeded
within the foreign
policy establishment, which is
controlled by “Zealot Zionists”.
Even the notorious Trilateral Commission globalist, Zbigniew Brzezinski
acknowledges the destructive influence of the Israeli lobby. In Foreign
Affairs, From Hope to Audacity he
states, “Special interest lobbies
have become overly influential in US politics. Thanks to their access to
Congress,
a variety of lobbies — some
financially well endowed, some backed by foreign interests — have been
promoting,
to an unprecedented degree,
legislative intervention in foreign-policy making.” While his designs on
global dominance
invite a world conflagration, his
distrust of Zionist pre-eminence is accurate.
So why allow dragging America into another war for a greater Israel? The thoughtful Paul Craig Roberts once again has it correct:
“The
answer is that the Israel Lobby, the
US military-security complex, and the “Christian” Zionists have
succeeded
in demonizing Iran. Every real
expert knows that an Iranian nuclear weapon would have no function other
than deterring an
attack on Iran. Ever since the US
lost its monopoly on nuclear weapons, after using them offensively and
pointlessly against
a defeated Japan, nuclear weapons
have served no purpose other than deterrence.
The US has no conflicting economic interests with Iran. Iran is simply a supplier
of oil, an important one. A US attack on Iran, such as the one advocated by Kuperman,
would most likely shut down oil flows to the West through the Strait of
Hormuz. This might benefit refiners,
who sell gasoline to the West and
could charge enormous prices, but no one else would benefit.
Adding
to the war cry are congregations of fake Christians. A great number
of them, organized by someone’s
money under the banner, “Christian Leaders for a Nuclear-free Iran,” has
written to Congress demanding
sanctions against Iran that amount to an act of war.”
|
This
mad American foreign policy, dominated
by dual loyalties, is a destructive
force bent on an imperial and perverse allegiance under the Star of
David. BATR resident Iranian expert Rev. Mark Dankof demonstrates a rational and balanced perspective. Written during the first Bush administration,
Mr. Dankof’s words ring just as true, today.
“The
United States cannot reasonably insist upon Iranian submission to IAEA
inspection and potential
dismantlement of militarily-related
nuclear programs without insisting upon the application of the same
standard to the government
of Israel, its Dimona
nuclear-weapons production plant, and its Institute of Biological
Sciences and Research in Tel Aviv,
among other operations and sites in
that country that meet neither IAEA standards nor those of the
Non-Proliferation Treaty
(NPF). The notion that Tehran has no
right or legitimate claim to Weapons of Mass Destruction while the
regime of international
war criminal Ariel Sharon does, is
morally and politically unsustainable.”
When the Wall Street Journal
reports, “Some Israeli officials worry a unilateral strike would cause a
break with Washington that
would threaten Israeli national
interests even more than a nuclear-armed Iran”, loyal and true American
conservatives have reason to
rejoice. Pressure to stop the lunacy of another aggressive war from
within Israel from Jews of
moral character is a welcome
development. But is that the real motive of these Israeli officials or
do they just sense that
Bebe Netanyahu is a mad bomber that
is more dangerous than a boastful Mahmoud Ahmadinejad?
Who
is more likely to use nuclear weapons? Since the American empire has
already
answered that question and Israel
has threatened the entire region and parts of Europe with atomic
annihilation, what right
do they have to claim the high moral
ground?
There
is no existential threat to America
from Iran. In addition, there is no beneficial interest or intrinsic
security for the
United States in fighting Israeli
wars. The true moral imperative is to cut ties with Zionism and condemn
the sociopathic
arrogance that adheres to the
superiority of the tribe over the rest of humanity. Khazars professing Talmudic duplicity are the cause of the pending Middle East Armageddon.
Robert Parry sums up the actual motivation that subverts a constructive American foreign policy. “The
neocon/Likud hope would be that
these military attacks would embolden Iran’s internal opposition to rise
up and overthrow
the Islamic system that has governed
Iran since 1979, in other words, “regime change.” Much like the
neocon/Likud
thinking about Iraq, however, these
grandiose plans often end up with unpredictable and bloody outcomes”.
Another “Operation Opera” will bring a widespread conflict that invites Russian and Chinese inclusion. Even Fidel Castro
warned of an impending nuclear holocaust, “If Obama approves an attack
on Iran, he added, he will trigger
a war that will spread through the
Middle East and Asia and cause ``the instantaneous death of hundreds of
millions people,
among them an incalculable number of
people in his own country.''
Patriotic
Americans must break with Israel and become vocal in their denunciation
of Zionist designs to subjugate
the region under a deceptive banner.
Israel is not a trusted ally of the United States. Warmongering is
tantamount to national
suicide. The public needs to act
before the bombs drop. No one can say that they had no idea what was
about to happen. The
fat lady is rehearsing her voice.
Before she starts singing with sharpened spears, shout out your dissent.
SARTRE – August 8, 2010
|
US to launch blitz of gas exports, eyes global energy dominance
The US Energy Department prepares a wave of LNG gas permits in the latest move to redraw the world's oil and gas landscape
The United States is poised to flood world
markets with once-unthinkable quantities of liquefied natural gas as
soon as this year, profoundly changing the geo-politics of global energy
and posing a major threat to Russian gas dominance in Europe.
"We anticipate becoming big players, and I think we'll have a big
impact," said the Ernest Moniz, the US Energy Secretary. "We're going to
influence the whole global LNG market."
Mr Moniz said four LNG export terminals are under construction and the
first wave of shipments may begin before the end of this year or in
early 2016 at the latest.
“Certainly in this decade, there’s a good chance that we will be LNG
exporters on the scale of Qatar, which is today’s largest LNG exporter,”
he said, speaking on the margins of the IHS CERAWeek energy summit in
Texas.
Qatar exports just over 100
billion cubic meters (BCM), though Australia is catching up fast as the
offshore Gorgon field comes on stream. It may pull ahead of Qatar later
this decade.
Mr Moniz said the surge in
US output from shale fracking has already transformed the global market.
"We would have been importing a lot of LNG by now. Those cargoes would
have gone elsewhere and have in fact had a significant impact in the
European market,” he said. Gas frackers assembled at the world's "energy Davos" in Houston said exports could ultimately be much higher, potentially overtaking Russia as the world's biggest supplier of natural gas of all kinds.
"We're just fifteen years into a 150-year process," said Steve Mueller, head of Southwestern Energy, the fourth biggest producer of gas in the US .
The mile-deep Marcellus basin stretching from West Virginia through Pennsylvania to New York state is driving the explosive growth. Interlocking fractures in the rock make it possible for a single well with advanced technology to extract much more gas than thought possible just five years ago.
Once thought to be in decline, the Marcellus alone produces 113 BCM a year. This is roughly equivalent to Russia's exports to Europe through the Nord Stream, Yamal, and Brotherhood pipelines.
Mr Mueller defiantly sweeps aside those who claim that the US fracking industry is in serious trouble, insisting that drilling costs are coming down so fast that his company - and others - are staying a step ahead of falling prices.
"Rig efficiency was flat for thirty years but since then we've cut by five times. We have set in motion something that you can't deny and is irresistible," he said.
Mr Mueller said it had taken his company 17 days to drill a 2,600 ft well as recently as 2007. It has just drilled a 5,400 ft well in six days. "The new technology is amazing. We have a drill-bit with a chip inside that makes its own changes," he said.
He is continuing to invest heavily and hopes to boost output by up to 10pc annually for the next three years, despite a drop in gas prices to around $2.60 per million British thermal units (BTU). "If it stays around $3, we'll be fine," he said.
The US Energy Information Administration (EIA) expects gas prices to rise to $4.88 in real terms by 2020, and $7.85 by 2040.
What is remarkable is that US drillers can produce a third more natural gas today with 280 rigs than they did in 2009 with 1,200 rigs. Total shale output has soared to over 350 BCM from almost nothing a decade ago. It now makes up half of US gas production.
The Obama administration has so far been slow to approve new export terminals for LNG, partly because of concerns that the US would lose its massive advantage in energy and feedstock costs for industry.
Gas sells at for $7 in Europe, and over $10 in North-East Asia, four times more expensive. This cost-gap has been a key driver behind America's so-called "manufacturing renaissance", stoking an investment boom in chemicals, plastics, and glass, and saving the country's steel mills from slow death.
A corridor from Houston to New Orleans has attracted 33 petrochemical plants worth over $1bn each since 2011. The American Chemistry Council expects over $130 billion of industrial projects along this stretch by 2023.
The administration has concluded that the US lead is now so entrenched that there is little to lose from a partial levelling of the global playing field. The expense of freezing gas for liquefaction to minus 260 degrees Fahrenheit and shipping it across the Atlantic or Pacific in molybdenum-hulled vessels is enough to maintain a big cost advantage for US manufacturers.
Four LNG terminals with a combined export capacity of 70 BCM are likely to be approved soon by the Energy Department. The front-runner is Cherniere's $18bn terminal at Sabine Pass in Louisiana.
Experts are split over whether North America really can become the world's dominant LNG player. Moody's warned earlier this month that most of the 30 gas liquefaction projects planned in the US and Canada will never get off the ground, chiefly due to the linkage between LNG contracts and the price of crude. "The drop in international oil prices has wiped out the price advantage US LNG projects," it said.
Michael Smith, head of Freeport LNG, said his company will press ahead regardless with plans for a $13bn plant near Houston, and predicted that the US could soon leap-frog all rivals to become the new gas hegemon. "Our projects are very competitive and we will continue to have an advantage over the rest of the world," he said.
Russian president Vladimir Putin warned at the St Petersburg economic summit last year that US shale gas was abruptly changing the international order, with serious implications for his country. The early effects have forced down global LNG prices, creating a rival source of gas supply in Europe.
Any future American cargoes would further erode Gazprom's pricing power in Europe, and erode the Kremlin's political leverage. The EU already has a large network of import terminals for LNG.
Lithuania has just finished its "Independence" terminal, opening up the Baltic states to LNG. Poland's new terminal should be ready this year.
America's parallel drive for shale oil is equally breath-taking. Scott Sheffield, head of Pioneer Natural Resources, said his company has discovered huge reserves in the vast Permian Basin of West Texas.
"We think the Permian could produce 5-6m barrels a day (b/d) in the long-term," he said. It is a staggering claim. This would be more than Saudi Arabia's giant Ghawar field, the biggest in the world.
Ryan Lance, head of ConocoPhillips, said North American oil output could reach 15m b/d by 2020 and 25m b/d over the next quarter century, three times Saudi Arabia's current exports.
A vault forward on this scale would establish the US as the leading energy superpower in both oil and gas, a revival that almost nobody could have imagined seven years ago when the United States was in near panic over its exorbitant dependency of imported fuel. It would restore the US to its mid-20th Century position as a surplus trading nation, and perhaps ultimately as world's biggest external creditor once again.
Fracking is still an almost exclusive preserve of North America, and is likely to remain so into the early 2020s. China has large ambitions but the volumes are still tiny, and there is a shortage of water in key areas. Fracking remains mere talk in most other regions of the world.
Lukoil analysts say Russian extraction costs for shale are four times higher that those of US wildcat drillers. Sanctions currently prevent the Russians importing the know-how and technology to tap its vast Bazhenov basin at a viable cost.
John Hess, the founder of Hess Corporation, said it takes a unique confluence of circumstances to pull off a fracking revolution: landowner rights over sub-soil minerals, a pipeline infrastructure, the right taxes and regulations, and good rock. “We haven’t seen those stars align yet,” he said.
Above all it requires the acquiescence of the people. "It takes a thousand trucks going in and out to launch a (drilling) spud. Not every neighbourhood wants that," he said.
Certainly not in Sussex, Burgundy, or Bavaria.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)