Warning! Graphic Video! LEAKED VIDEO: ISIS Puts Innocent People In A Giant Cage, Locks Them Inside, Sinks Them Into A Pool And Drowns Them To Death. They Then Take Another Group Of People, Wrap Them With Explosive Rope And Blow Them Up To Pieces - Walid Shoebat

By Ted on June 23, 2015 in Featured, General

By Theodore Shoebat

ISIS here is showing a combination of execution innovations, with footage unlike anything we have seen before: heads exploding and flying like projectiles, people incinerated with napalm burning them alive, locking people into a giant cage and drowning them to death while recording their screams underwater. Truly sickening. ISIS as it seems are tired of slow beheadings. In the end of the video they perfected an instant beheading technique. They take a number of men, wrap them with explosive rope and blow the heads to shoot upwards like a projectiles. The puppet Obama and his analogy calling ISIS “jayvee team putting on Lakers uniforms” just shows how ridiculous our government is. Perhaps after watching ISIS’s sickest, just released video, that only this will finally wake Americans up, especially that we had 52 attempts linked to ISIS style activity in the U.S in 2015 alone. Here, the ISIS killing fields that no one in the media will ever show:

http://shoebattube.com/player/embed_player.php?vid=968&width=600&height=370&autoplay=no

As to the victims, they were accused of being spies, and ISIS had them confess to their supposed culpability before killing them. It is truly horrifying to watch this. Death to all of these heathens, for the glory of Christ. This is why the Crusades fought against these demonic people, and it is no wonder that St. Bernard wrote:

The knight of Christ, I say, may strike with confidence and succumb more confidently. When he strikes, he does service to Christ, and to himself when he succumbs. Nor does he bear the sword in vain. He is God’s minister in the punishment of evil doers and the praise of well doers. Surely, if he kills an evil doer, he is not a man-killer, but, if I may so put it, an evil killer. Clearly he is reckoned the avenger of Christ against evildoers, and the defender of Christians. Should he be killed himself, we know he has not perished, but has come safely home. The death which he inflicts is Christ’s gain, and that which he suffers, his own. At the death of the pagan, the Christian exults because Christ is exalted; in the death of the Christian the King’s liberality is conspicuous when the knight is ushered home and rewarded. (St. Bernard, In Praise of a New Knighthood, ch.2)

Islam must be uprooted and destroyed, but that is not going to happen until Christ comes, and with Him as our King and General, the armies of Christ will vanquish and utterly destroy this religion of the Antichrist.
All this gets to show that we need to get the Christians out of Syria and Iraq as such persecution will increase as we see these events unfold. Rescue Christians helps Christians who live under the Muslim yoke flee the persecution. To see an example out of the thousands we rescue, click here, and listen to the amazing testimonies first hand on how you can help and make a difference, now in this life and for eternity.
The video of these murders was released from the Nineveh Plains province in Iraq, which is heavily populated by Christians. This type of brutality is being done to Christians and we have to get them out before its too late.
“Do not store up for yourselves treasures on earth, where moths and vermin destroy, and where thieves break in and steal”.CONSIDER DONATING TO RESCUE CHRISTIANS

KNOW WHAT IS REALLY GOING ON TO CHRISTIANS IN THE MUSLIM WORLD. WATCH OUR DOCUMENTARY THAT SHOWS THE REALITY OF CHRISTIAN PERSECUTION
http://shoebat.com/2015/06/23/leaked-video-isis-puts-innocent-people-in-a-giant-cage-locks-them-inside-sinks-them-into-a-pool-and-drowns-them-to-death-they-then-take-another-group-of-people-wrap-them-with-explosive-rope-and-b/

Marriage 'persecution' starts

Family group: Marriage 'persecution' starts

'Already we see evidence that we will lose our First Amendment right of free speech'

Published: 21 hours ago

At mid-morning on Friday the U.S. Supreme Court announced that it had created same-sex “marriage” for homosexuals and lesbians across the United States, using a convoluted logic from Justice Anthony Kennedy that included citations to Cicero and Confucius.

Within hours, the persecution of those who disagree had started, according to a statement from a family group based in Pennsylvania.
“Already we see evidence right in our state that we will lose our First Amendment right of free speech simply because we do not agree with today’s SCOTUS decision and understand the historic definition of marriage,” said a statement released by the American Family Association of Pennsylvania. “What better way to say all are on board with this decision than to silence the voices of those not in agreement?”
The comments stemmed from an announcement from editorialists at Pennlive.com. that they would no longer allow opinion or editorial pieces “in opposition to same-sex marriage.”
“These unions are now the law of the land,” the publication said.
And it likened those who still support traditional and biblical marriage, despite the court’s opinion, to those who are “racist, sexist or anti-Semitic.”
The family group responded, “Pennlive, the Harrisburg area news organization, has announced a change in op-eds and letters to the editor, stating, ‘As a result of Friday’s ruling, Pennlive/The Patriot-news will very strictly limit op-eds and letters to the editor in opposition to same-sex marriage.’”
Said Diane Gramley, the organization’s chief, “Already we see evidence right in our state that we will lose our First Amendment right of free speech simply because we do not agree.”

The organization said, “This newspaper organization is equating homosexuality to race – a big mistake as race is immutable or unchangeable and homosexuality is changeable as evidenced by the thousands who have left the lifestyle. PennLive/The Patriot-News has bought into the lie!”
Gramley continued, “Penn/Live/The Patriot-News wants to end the debate, but it has only just begun. Five unelected Justices of the Supreme Court cannot redefine true marriage any more than one unelected judge in Pennsylvania can. Marriage is still and always will be between one man and one woman. As pointed out in Justice Scalia’s dissenting opinion, America has always been about the freedom to debate an issue. To stifle that debate is to stifle the American way.
“However, we will see an increase in persecution against those who hold the traditional view of marriage, as evidenced by the newspaper’s change in policy. This decision is not a march to progress, but the exact opposite,” she said.
The Daily Caller jumped on the controversy, calling the Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, company’s stance “hardcore.”
The report said the publication at first said it would “no longer accept, nor will it print, op-eds and letters to the editor in opposition to same-sex marriage.”
The DC reported newspaper officials later added, “Clarification: We will not foreclose discussion of the high court’s decision, but arguments that gay marriage is wrong/unnatural are out.”
Commenters, the DC reported, were ticked.
“Nice to see strict speech codes will be enforced by the ‘free’ press,” wrote an anonymous “Big Jasper.” “No need to worry about that messy ‘freedom of expression’ thing anymore.”
The newspaper’s reporting followed its editorial policy already: “In the more than four decades since, a union that was viewed as unnatural and even a hideous provocation to violence is now commonplace and celebrated. On Friday, the United States crossed a similar threshold, continuing a long road to acceptance of same-sex unions.”
The news organization eventually confirmed “some” letters critiquing the court decision will be accepted.
It did describe some of those submissions with criticisms as “hate speech.”


Read more at http://mobile.wnd.com/2015/06/family-group-marriage-persecution-starts/#iiAQOiz4SvvrE20Z.99

The Truth About Self-Determination and Secession

THE TRUTH ABOUT SELF-DETERMINATION AND SECESSION

Without a meaningful ability to make choices — or provide a new choice via secession — no truly voluntary choice has been made

                                  

by Ryan McMaken | Mises.org | June 27, 2015

The secessionist impulse doesn’t seem to be going away in Europe.

This month, the Wall Street Journal reported that the latest drive for secession comes from Sardinia. The leaders of the movement propose that the island, only part of Italy since the 1860s, be joined to Switzerland instead.
The Sardinians have a tough row to hoe in convincing the Swiss to accept them as the newest Swiss canton (Sardinians do have a coastline to offer, however), but the whole episode illustrates yet again that the national borders drawn on the map over the past two centuries are beginning to outlive their usefulness.

What Is Self-Determination?

As with the Venetians, the Scots, and the Catalonians, the matter of Sardinian secession and/or annexation involves any number of referenda and discussions about “self-determination.” And in this case, as with most similar cases, one is left with the problem of determining how one can morally go about switching state affiliations without precipitating war or accusations of human rights abuses. The Europeans don’t phrase it this way, but when they discuss the need for plebiscites and “democracy,” this is what they mean.

Certainly, this problem was not at all alien to the laissez-faire liberals of the nineteenth century, including Ludwig von Mises, who wrote: “No people and no part of a people shall be held against its will in a political association that it does not want.” Mises then went on to defend “the right of the inhabitants of every territory to decide on the state to which they wish to belong.” Murray Rothbard explained Mises’s position further:

The right of self-determination in regard to the question of membership in a state thus means: whenever the inhabitants of a particular territory, whether it be a single village, a whole district, or a series of adjacent districts make it known, by a freely conducted plebiscite, that they no longer wish to remain united to the state to which they belong at the time, but wish either to form an independent state or to attach themselves to some other state, their wishes are to be respected and complied with. This is the only feasible and effective way of preventing revolutions and civil and international wars.

On a purely technical level, it’s easy to imagine this sort of territorial plebiscitary process. The problem one is left with in these cases, however, is what to do with minorities that oppose the secession or annexation by other states. This is the claim made by nationalists who oppose secession by Catalonia, for example. The nationalists assert that even if a majority were to prefer independence, minorities within Catalonia itself would be disenfranchised by secession. The nationalists’ solution in this scenario, therefore, is to disenfranchise the majority. But this “solution” is nothing more than an appeal to the central government to unilaterally “settle” the problem with force. In contrast, the proper solution lies not in centralization but in further breaking down the size of each territory into smaller pieces to account for demographic realities and minority populations (which are rarely evenly dispersed) within the regions themselves.

Doesn’t This Lead To Anarchism?

But if any community, no matter how small, can simply break off and join another state or remain independent, what’s to stop single households from doing this? Rothbard asked this same question, and it brings us back to Mises’s comments on self-determination. Mises writes:

If it were in any way possible to grant this right of self-determination to every individual person, it would have to be done. This is impracticable only because of compelling technical considerations which make it necessary that the right of self-determination be restricted to the will of the majority of the inhabitants of areas large enough to count as territorial units in the administration of the country.

In other words, anarchism is theoretically justifiable, although technically problematic. Mises no doubt has a point here since there are economies of scale in both military and civil defense. It is debatable whether or not the technical consideration — from the state’s perspective — cannot be overcome with technological innovation, however. Bureaucratic administration (whether governmental or private) may have required a certain minimum size of departments and territorial units in Mises’s day, but it’s unclear that such problems are insurmountable today given the decentralization and networking capabilities of modern administrative and communications technology. Nevertheless, from a sociological and economic standpoint, Mises’s concern about there being a practical “floor” to the extent to which states can be broken up appears to be useful. After all, there is no denying that people like to join together in groups for a variety of purposes not limited to military and economic ends. The mega-states of the modern world are held together by coercion, but cities, towns, and communities are naturally occurring phenomena that pre-date states. Moreover, just as I give up the freedom to talk loudly or adjust the volume when I watch a movie at a theater instead of my home, virtually everyone — even in a system of theoretically limitless secession — would give up at least some of his own personal prerogatives in the name of joining a municipality, league, or association that could provide legal and defense services. At the same time, individuals would be careful to keep the majority of power at the local level, since individuals can still exercise influence over localized governments. (This is not the case in a huge state like the United States where an individual who is not a billionaire has nearly zero influence over anything the national government does.) But this raises a new question. If people “choose” to give up certain prerogatives to join with others in cities and towns, isn’t this true of all states? Haven’t people “voluntarily” chosen to be part of Russia, or part of the United States? The answer here is “no” because without a meaningful ability to make choices — or provide a new choice via secession — no truly voluntary choice has been made.

A Sliding Scale From One-World Government To Statelessness

As I’ve noted here, states erect legal and practical barriers to extend their monopoly powers over a large area, and over many facets of life in order to diminish choices and options. Likewise, states generally prohibit the creation of new states, so as to further strengthen their monopolies. So, the extent to which one is voluntarily subject to a civil government moves along a sliding scale. At one end of the scale is a one-world mega-state where no choice is possible at all. At the other end of the scale is a totally stateless society. Most — if not all — of human history has been characterized by civil governments that fall somewhere in between. Some civil governments are very large and very coercive. That is, they are quintessential states. Some governments are very small and very decentralized and are much less state-like. These later governments must compete with numerous nearby options for citizens and capital. Naturally, a world with fewer states and very centralized states offers few options, which in turn means fewer choices for persons, cities, towns, and communities. In spite of this, we still sometimes encounter the bizarre argument that secession is bad because secession “creates a new state.” But, just as consumers of pizza benefit when a new Pizza Hut opens down the street to compete with Domino’s Pizza, consumers of defense services and legal systems benefit when a new competitor becomes available in their neighborhood of states. If Domino’s Pizza managed to use force to prevent any other Pizza chain from opening up in town, that would clearly be a bad thing. Likewise, when a state uses force to prevent the creation of a new state, or prevent the movement of a region from one state to another, we can see this is undesirable because it limits choice, freedom, innovation, and all the good things we associate with a lack of monopoly power.

So Can Sardinia Morally Secede?

In the unlikely event that Switzerland declared it would love to welcome Sardinia into the confederation, Italian unionists would still oppose secession on legal and sentimental grounds. They would also claim that Sardinia cannot secede because some Sardinians wish to remain part of Italy. If a majority of Sardinians actually wished to secede, though, then Italian unionists are making the arbitrary claim that most Sardinians should be forced to remain in Italy because some Sardinians say so. And of course, the power of the Italian state would be hung as a constant threat over the heads of secessionists as well. The answer to this conundrum is not to simply accept the might-makes-right argument, of course. The answer is to therefore break Sardinia itself into smaller pieces. If the people of North Sardinia want to secede, and the people of South Sardinia, do not, then our problem has been solved. Even after this division is made, there are sure to still be disagreeable minorities, but with each reduction in the size of the territory in question, the amount of choice for those in the unfortunate minority increases. A move to South Sardinia from North Sardinia (to escape the secessionists) is far less disruptive to one’s life than a move from Sardinia to the Italian mainland for the same purposes. There is no perfect and clean method of breaking down nation-states, but as the Americans, the Irish, the Chechens, and many others could tell us, state intervention to prevent secession is often the bloodiest and messiest option of all.

http://www.infowars.com/the-truth-about-self-determination-and-secession/

Racist Guns Down Three People In Atlanta.

Sharing w/ALL Patriots bcc herein Fred w/permission to forward:

  The Double-Standard is as appalling as it is Obvious.

  As such, the Hypocrisy that is akin to it allows for the Enemy from Within to advance their odious Ideology under the guise of UnFairness, allowing for more Socialized mechanisms to be IMPLANTED.

Using Humanitarianism as a ‘cause celeb’ is the oldest Marxist trick in the book.

And America has Swallowed this sanctimonious puke lock, stock & proverbial barrel thanks to the government’s National Education Department (created in the 1970’s) that BELCHES this crap while using our Tax Money to advance its Diatribe!

State ‘public schools’ NO longer TEACH- they merely echo that which they are told to ‘Teach’ less their Central-National government subsidies are withheld.

Thus a Foreign Ideology spreads like a shroud encompassing one and all divorcing them from ALL REALITY & historical truth.

 This country NO more looks like the Republic of old than does a skunk look like a snake.

Thus BULL-SHIT trumps REALITY and the People become ‘fodder for the political cannons’  that supposedly NEVER existed.

By the Eternal, but WE MUST SEPARATE!

For God, family and the Restoration of The Republic of the Original Confederation,

Craig Maus,

President, The Confederate Society of America

www.deovindice.org

__________________________________________

Subject: Racist Guns Down Three People In Atlanta

YOU WON’T HEAR ABOUT THIS:

 

Racist Guns Down Three People In Atlanta

Posted on June 25, 2015

by Kenn Daily
Clash Daily Contributor

Remember this?

Probably you don’t.

Nkosi Thandiwe, an African migrant, gunned down three women in Atlanta because they were white.

One of the victims was killed, another was paralyzed, and a third was injured.

The racist attacks occurred in 2011. Thandiwe was convicted and sentenced to life in prison two years later.

The attack received sparse coverage outside Atalanta.

There was no media circus, no Geraldo feigning to be outraged; no Glenn Beck making a trek to Atlanta to demonstrate his anti-racism.

The was no wall-to-wall coverage on CNN, MSNBC, or Fox News.

There was no statement from Barack Obama blaming guns for the crime. The Confederate flag was not dragged into the conversation, and there was no nationwide sentiment of guilt over black racism.

Thandiwe’s hatred for white people was made apparent by his own words. He claimed to have formed his anti-white perspective while enrolled at the University of West Georgia.

The Atlanta Journal-Constitution reported Thandiwe’s hatred for whites:

“I was trying to prove a point that Europeans had colonized the world, and as a result of that, we see a lot of evil today,” he said.

“In terms of slavery, it was something that needed to be answered for. I was trying to spread the message of making white people mend.”

He said the night before the shooting, he attended a so-called “Peace Party” intended to address his concerns about helping the black community find equal footing, but two white people were there.

“I was upset,” Thandiwe said. “I was still upset Friday. I took the gun to work because I was still upset from Thursday night.”

He even admitted to earlier that day getting angry enough on the job to shoot his supervisor. “What my boss said to me …,” he told the jury, “that rage almost made me pull out my gun on him.”

There was no national outrage over the perennial flood of hate propaganda flowing into the minds of students at America’s colleges and universities.

There was no memorial built at the site of the murder commemorating the life of Thandiwe’s victim, Brittney Watts; nor will there ever be.

There were no writers hustling screen plays in Hollywood hoping to capitalize on the hate.

There is a reason.

The tragic episode in Atlanta simply does not fit the cultural Marxism narrative that white people are the oppressing bourgeois and non-white are the perennially oppressed proletariat.

Consequently, the racist attack never gained media traction and has subsequently been forgotten as just another footnote in America’s criminal history.

Kenn Daily is the publisher of DailyKenn.com. Now 62 years old, Kenn formed his conservative views at the age of 14 and was an early member of Young Americans for Freedom.

He is a vociferous anti-racist but sets himself apart from most conservatives by refusing to be bullied into silence regarding racial issues.

Violent black crime is a signature issue of his website. Kenn is a semi-retired business owner.

He lives in Indiana with his wife of 39 years.

He has two grown children — a daughter and son — four grandchildren, and two granddogs.

old Butch the Rooster...

 

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta

www.eagleonetowanta.com/

Veterans Today

Lee E Wanta

Bureau Chief / Editor

A-1010, Vienna, Austria - Europa

Available at Amazon : WANTA! Black Swan, White Hat

old Butch the Rooster

Sarah was in the fertilized egg business. She had several hundred young pullets and ten roosters to fertilize the eggs.
 

She kept records and any rooster not performing went into the soup pot and was replaced.
 

This took a lot of time, so she bought some tiny bells and attached them to her roosters. Each bell had a different tone, so she could tell from a distance which rooster was performing. Now, she could sit on the porch and fill out an efficiency report by just listening to the bells.
 

Sarah's favorite rooster, old Butch, was a very fine specimen but, this morning she noticed old Butch's bell hadn't rung at all! When she went to investigate, she saw the other roosters were busy chasing pullets, bells-a-ringing, but the pullets hearing the roosters coming, would run for cover.

To Sarah's amazement, old Butch had his bell in his beak, so it could not ring. He would sneak up on a pullet, do his job, and walk on to the next one.

Sarah was so proud of old Butch, she entered him in the Dowerin Show and he became an overnight sensation among the judges.

The result was the judges not only awarded old Butch the "No Bell Peace Prize" they also awarded him the "Pulletsurprise" as well.

Clearly old Butch was clearly a true politician in the making.

 

Who else but a politician could figure out how to win two of the most coveted awards on our planet by being the best at sneaking up on the unsuspecting populace and fertilizing them when they were not paying attention?
 

Vote carefully in the next election. You can not always hear the bells.

 

(If you don¹t send this on, you're chicken……no yoke!)

The Warfare planned against Citizens <<>> This is in printed by NASA <<>> RESPONSE FROM A READER

NOW HEAR THIS !!!!

THIS IS A RESPONSE FROM ONE OF MY PERSONAL READERS

WAKE UP AMERICA... THIS MAN IS AWAKE... ISN'T IT TIME YOU WOKE UP ??

BEFORE IT'S REALLY  TOOOOO LATE ???

THIS IS A FULL SATANIC ATTACK AGAINST NOT JUST AMERICA BUT THE ENTIRE WORLD
AND THEY INTEND TO INCLUDE THE ENTIRE UNIVERSE AND SOLAR SYSTEM...

THEY ARE ALL OPERATING UNDER A DELUSION  UNDER TOTAL SATANIC INFLUENCE

FOR OVER 5000 YEARS THAT WE KNOW OF...

PREACHERS.. "QUIT YOUR BITCHING" ON THE INTERNET AND IN CHURCH OVER "SMALL THINGS"

IT'S TIME YOU TOSSED OUT YOUR 501C3 == YOUR NON PROFIT AFFILIATION  TO GOV. AKA/ SATAN

AND START PREACHING ON STREET CORNERS, UNDER TREES AND IN HOMES... PREACHERS, YOU
ARE LEADING YOUR "UNKNOWING" CONGREGATIONS STRAIGHT TO HELL.. YOU WILL HAVE PLENTY
OF COMPANY !!! 

ONCE YOU RELIEVE YOURSELF OF YOUR OWN SATANIC AFFILIATION ( WHICH YOU WERE DUPED INTO
YEARS AGO.. )  AND START REAL REVIVALS ( I MEAN "REAL" NOT THESE HOORAH - SWEET TALKING
REVIVALS TO GET TITHES AND OFFERINGS )  THEN THINGS WILL START TO TURN AROUND FOR
EVERYONE...   IT IS YOU PREACHERS   -- UNBELIEVERS -- SATAN WORSHIPERS ( KNOWINGLY AND
UNKNOWINGLY) WHO HAVE BEEN HOLDING BACK OUR BLESSINGS.. AND THE TURN AROUND WE NEED.

I DON'T CARE HOW MANY TIMES "O" SINGS AMAZING GRACE TO "SUCK YOU IN"...LET'S HOPE IT
BACKFIRES AND ACTUALLY "SUCKS HIM IN" TO THE "RIGHT THINGS" AND DOING THINGS THE "RIGHT
WAY" AND NOT SATAN'S WAY... WHICH IS WHAT HAS BEEN GOING ON.. ALL OF (PSEUDO) CONGRESS
IS UNDER SATANIC INFLUENCE..
DO YOU NOT SEE IT ?
DO YOU NOT HEAR IT?
HAVE YOU LOST YOUR SENSE OF "DISCERNMENT" ?
BEST PRAY TO GET IT BACK -- FAST !!

TIME IS SHORT !!

(jbs-06-28-2015)

WE ARE AT  WAR NOW..  WE HAVE BEEN AT WAR FOR YEARS
BUT... EVERYONE WAS ASLEEP... YOU ARE WAKING UP "NOW"
THANK GOD !!


READERS RESPONSE:

 The Warfare planned against Citizens This is in printed by NASA

Look up and read smartmetersmurder.com.    Watch the Iron Mountain documentary.  But Powers that be have already been sending frequency attacks that will eventually kill us.  If you have ringing in the ears, dust in your mouth, and other  maladies then you have been receiving these frequencies and being poisoned by ChemTrails.  People are intentionally been made to be sick.   The frequencies have multiple purposes.

The solution is to become more informed.  Read "Silent Weapons for Quiet Wars" which was printed after the first Bilderberg meeting for their plan to depopulate the world, plus, plus, plus things we see today.   Pray more.  Gather together in communities for strength and support. 

We don't need a revolution but a new revelation that we have been under seize by the bankers and the powers that be.   Our Constitutional rights to a larger extent have been lost.  

They are trying to pass a carbon tax based upon mileage because of the pollution, so we have to pay for our air, and this money goes to the PTB.   

The fish have become radioactive from; the birds have been injected with virus, and next will be the cows.   They are taking away our protein.   Then they are poisoning our soil, so our vegetables are losing their potency. 

tsi technology says they are putting sensors in everything.   Artificial intelligence is taking over.   They now have cars that drive themselves without a driver.   They have for decades been dumbing down Americans and those in the world. 

We have to vote in government representatives that will go after the PTB.   You have to first learn who and how they are doing this to us.  This is a silent internal war against us.  

Watch this video;  it is revealing.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eN4XICOyRb8

Get more information from:

stopthecrime.net.

Challenge: what {FAKE} >>US federal legislator will dare to get arrested over the TPP?

Challenge: what US federal legislator will dare to get arrested over the TPP?

Anthony Freda Art

By Jon Rappoport

TPP: US Congress’ stage play, con game, pretense, parade of cowards

(To read about Jon’s mega-collection, Power Outside The Matrix, click here.)

When puppets dance on the end of a string, they need to exhibit a pretense of freedom once in a while, to keep the customers interested. It’s part of the show. It’s part of the con.

The Congress has now granted Obama “fast-track authority.” What does this actually mean?

It means that, when the TPP (Trans-Pacific Partnership) Treaty comes up for consideration soon, this gargantuan Globalist takeover of 12 national governments cannot be amended. It cannot be filibustered. From the time the TPP is introduced, no more than 90 days can elapse before the House and Senate cast their yes or no votes.

Most people concede that the passage of fast-track ensures the passage of the TPP, but of course this isn’t so.

Nothing would prevent the Congress from voting the TPP down, especially and because the contents of the Treaty are secret. The public isn’t informed of the details.

Any US legislator with a trace of courage would do just that—vote it down.

The legislators themselves have been allowed to enter a sealed room and read some of the content. But there is no guarantee that what they’re reading is in the final draft of the Treaty.

The legislators may takes notes in the sealed room, but they can’t keep their notes. They can’t make copies. They can’t discuss what they’ve read with the press or the public.

Again, on that basis alone, any legislator with a shred of honor would vote no on the Treaty.

And no on secrecy.

If a member of Congress did break omertà and reveal to the public what he read in the sealed room, he would be violating Executive Branch regulations on classified data (“national security”), and he could be arrested.

Well, that is exactly what a Senator or Representative who, with courage and honor, opposes the TPP, should welcome. An arrest? He should celebrate it.

First of all, no sitting legislator is going to receive a stiff prison sentence for violating secrecy in this instance.

Second, by being arrested, he would become a popular hero overnight and force the issue of secrecy into the global spotlight.

Third, the whole idea of the Executive Branch forcing legislators to maintain secrecy on a trade treaty is egregiously illegal—and the arrest of an honorable legislator would set up a potential Constitutional crisis. Which is exactly what this country needs.

What crisis? Ever heard of the Separation of Powers? The Constitution was established to create three branches of government—Executive, Legislative, and Judiciary. The powers of each serve as a check and balance on the others, to prevent the federal government from becoming…exactly what it is today: a bloated, fungal, expanding force dominating the states and the people.

The Executive Branch telling the Legislative Branch it can’t disclose the contents of a trade treaty to the press and public is a draconian overstep of its power and a clear violation of separation of powers.

The fact that not one of these Senators or Representatives has revealed all he knows about the TPP, in order to correct this fundamental violation (and gotten arrested), is an absolute signal that they’re all faking it.

Faking it. In broad daylight.

A few legislators have alluded to what they’ve read in the sealed room—small pieces of it. But that’s it. That’s the extent of their “outrage.”

The rest is all bullshit of the highest order.

The debate over the TPP, the opposition, the objections—all bullshit.

Those Senators and Representatives who will eventually vote no on the TPP know very well that the majority will vote yes. So their no votes won’t mean a thing, except for gaining a bit of publicity and perhaps currying a bit of favor with their constituency back home.

The Executive Branch, under Obama, is actually providing an ideal opportunity for any honorable legislator. By classifying the TPP as “secret,” a Senator or Representative can get himself arrested and “jump the fence.” He can cause a massive uproar.

He can also force his colleagues in the House and Senate to rally to his defense—or expose themselves as corrupt disloyal cowards.

It’s a perfect situation for any legislator with courage.

But there are no takers.

They’re all fakers. Including Bernie Sanders, Elizabeth Warren, and Rand Paul.


These three know their opposition to the TPP doesn’t mean a thing. They know they could go further and spill all the secrets they know, at a press conference, and state in no uncertain terms that they dare the President to have them arrested.

But they won’t do it.

They’re part of what amounts to an unconstitutional “federal collective,” a club of little insiders, and they won’t break those chains.

Even when doing so would catapult themselves into the stratosphere as heroes.

Can you imagine it? Every day one of them spends in jail, his/her staff would be issuing statements to the press demanding the restoration of separation of powers.

And the headlines? And stories?

“Bernie keeps spilling secrets in jail!”

“It’s been revealed that Bernie Sanders, in his cell, is telling his guards everything he knows about the details of the TPP. He won’t shut up. We have a report that the guards have been given soundproof ear pads to wear. Bernie is scratching details of the TPP on the walls of his cell with his fingernails…”

Now THAT’S a stage play.

I’d pay to see that play.

That play would wake a lot of people up.

And for those who, even then, would refuse to fathom what’s going on…back to your snoozefest. Everything is wonderful. The State loves you. The State spies on you because it loves you. The State needs people just like you.

The author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED, EXIT FROM THE MATRIX, and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX, Jon was a candidate for a US Congressional seat in the 29th District of California. He maintains a consulting practice for private clients, the purpose of which is the expansion of personal creative power. Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health for CBS Healthwatch, LA Weekly, Spin Magazine, Stern, and other newspapers and magazines in the US and Europe. Jon has delivered lectures and seminars on global politics, health, logic, and creative power to audiences around the world. You can sign up for his free NoMoreFakeNews emails here or his OutsideTheRealityMachine emails here.

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.

The Final Frontier: US Building War Command Center to Take Foreign Policy to Space !!!!!

Saturday, June 27, 2015

The Final Frontier: US Building War Command Center to Take Foreign Policy to Space

By Carey Wedler

According to Defense One, the Pentagon is rushing to build a space war center to sustain its global power. Within six months, the space apparatus will be fully functional, as announced by Deputy Defense Secretary Robert Work at the 2015 GEOINT conference. Work openly admitted the move is an attempt by the Pentagon to maintain global dominance and combat alleged attacks from China and Russia.

Most prominently, the war center is intended to “track spy and military satellites at the same time so US intelligence and military can work together to create the best defense–especially against attacks on its satellite systems,” Gizmodo explained.

Lt. Gen. Vincent Stewart, director of the Defense Intelligence Agency, alleged in January that Russia and China are “are conducting anti-satellite research and developing anti-satellite weapons, with the intent of denying the U.S. the use of space in the event of conflict.” Such threats are used to justify American expansion into space.

Due to the military’s general lust for power and proliferation, it is unsurprising that the Pentagon is seeking to further extend its tentacles into the universe. The project will operate as a backup to the Joint Space Operations Center at Vandenberg Air Force Base in California. The Joint Space Operations Center already “detects, tracks, and identifies all artificial objects in Earth orbit.” Its practices include “surveillance of space, protection of U.S. and friendly space systems, prevention of an adversary’s ability to use space systems and services for purposes hostile to U.S. national security interests, and direct support to battle management, command, control, communications, and intelligence.”

The new war center enhances these abilities but also seeks to increase surveillance on Earth. Speaking at the GEOINT conference, Work expressed excitement that the new system would allow the military an even more omniscient presence throughout the planet. By aggregating satellite images from all government departments, the war center will be able to track behavior more easily.

“We want to be able to establish patterns of life from space. We want to know what the unusual looks like,” Work said.

If, all of a sudden, a lot of cars show up in a parking lot of an adversary’s missile plant, we want to know about it and we want to know about it quickly. If, suddenly, small boats are swarming in the Gulf or pirates are starting to congregate off Aden, we want to know.

Evidently, in spite of having the most powerful, well-funded, and heavily armed military on Earth, the Pentagon has schizophrenically decided it needs more reach, authority, and access. This does not mean that there are no threats. It simply means the United States’ first avenue—whether initiatory or retaliatory—is almost always dominance and force.

Naturally, familiar battle cries justified the new program. Work insisted that the drive to surpass Russian and Chinese technologies is vital and that Russia poses a “clear and present danger to the United States.”

Work claimed that while space was once a “virtual sanctuary,” it must now “be considered a contested operational domain in ways that we haven’t had to think about in the past.”

Though Work attempted to paint the military’s further colonization of space as a recent and necessary development, the move mirrors American and Russian Cold War-era tactics. As both countries raced to make advancements in space, they revealed a paranoid—and ultimately militaristic—approach to exploration beyond the planet’s atmosphere, dragging relatively petty earthly conflicts into a solar system previously untainted by human vice. This is characteristic not only of America, but of any corrupt, global power seeking to establish dominance on Earth by conquering territory beyond it.

“We must be prepared now to prevail in conflicts that extend into space,” Work argued.

“The ugly reality that we must now all face is that if an adversary were able to take space away from us, our ability to project decisive power across transoceanic distances and overmatch adversaries in theaters once we get there … would be critically weakened,” Work stated at the conference, unashamed of the military’s blatant power play.

Rather than working diplomatically to solve problems between nations, the United States has once again defaulted on an aggressive, battle-oriented mentality—an all too common trait that reveals why America is the world’s biggest hegemony. By insisting on the necessity of even more tools to surveil and wage war, the military does nothing but expose its well-documented and transparent obsession with conflict, aggression, and its characteristic megalomania.

Carey Wedler writes for theAntiMedia.org, where this article first appeared. Tune in! Anti-Media Radio airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific.

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.

Colombian Army Murdered Thousands of Civilians with the Help of US Tax Dollars

Saturday, June 27, 2015

Colombian Army Murdered Thousands of Civilians with the Help of US Tax Dollars

By Claire Bernish

A disturbing report published Wednesday by Human Rights Watch details how the Colombian military callously murdered thousands of innocent civilians and dressed their lifeless bodies in leftist rebels’ uniforms, just to artificially inflate the body count for a period of at least six years. The commander of the armed forces and other senior army brass knew about it the whole time.

Somewhat euphemistically termed “extrajudicial killings,” the practice has been recognized for some time, but HRW found evidence in previously unpublished prosecutorial records that the practice was far more extensive and systematic than previously realized.

Prosecutors are currently investigating 3,700 deaths caused by state agents. From 2002-2008, the report, titled “On Their Watch: Evidence of Senior Army Officers’ Responsibility for False Positive Killings in Colombia,” revealed that more than 180 brigades and tactical units—and their commanders—were responsible for murders of civilians. These “false positives” bolstered records at a time when success in the ongoing war was measured in dead rebel bodies. According to the report:

"Under pressure from superiors to show ‘positive’ results and boost body counts in their war against guerrillas, soldiers and officers abducted victims or lured them to remote locations under false pretenses—such as promises of work—killed them, placed weapons on their lifeless bodies, and then reported them as enemy combatants killed in action. Committed on a large scale for more than half a decade, these ‘false positive’ killings constitute one of the worst episodes of mass atrocity in the Western Hemisphere in recent decades […] This report provides the most detailed published account to date,” of what is “now substantial evidence that senior army officers were responsible for many of the killings [who] at least knew or should have known about the [the practice], and therefore may be criminally liable as a matter of command responsibility."

Suspicious mitigating circumstances and irregularities surrounding death counts—dubbed “entirely obvious” in the report—led HRW to believe there could be no plausible denial of awareness by senior army officers that the murders were occurring.

In just one example, a former 16th Brigade lieutenant testified that “with the rank of a colonel and the experience you could have at this rank it is no secret that the troops . . . [were] killing innocent people who had nothing to do with the conflict and were reported with weapons that the guerrilla does not use to confront you with.” In another instance, two unnamed battalion officials described regular meetings with their commanders to plan how to lure victims to their deaths. Once those schemes had been carried out, the officials were often rewarded with vacation time.

But holding the appropriate parties accountable for the murders has been a complicated process. Prosecutors face the seeming complicity of military judges, defense attorneys, and army officials who create “bogus delay tactics” such as refusing to hand over necessary documents. Ongoing threats and attacks on key witnesses—including a likely retaliatory murder—have hindered progress significantly.

It is extremely important to note that the United States government began the “Plan Colombia” aid project in 2000 under President Clinton. The U.S. has since donated over $6.5 billion to the country, with the vast majority earmarked for military and police.

According to Amnesty International, which is calling for an end to aid because of these exact human rights abuses, “in 2006, U.S. assistance to Colombia amounted to an estimated $728 million, approximately 80% of which was military and police assistance.” This was, of course, during the height of the military’s practice of killing civilians.

Last year, the Fellowship of Reconciliation (FOR) issued an extensive report that found a frightening link between U.S. assistance and human rights abuses. It states:

Based on data on 5,763 reported executions in Colombia and extensive documentation of U.S. assistance to the Colombian military, we found a positive correlation between the units and officers that received U.S. assistance and training, and the commission of extrajudicial killings.

Also revealed by the telling FOR report:

“U.S. military training […] is practically a required step for the promotion of a Colombian Army officer.” And of those so trained, “12 of them—48%—had either been charged with a serious crime or had commanded units whose members had reportedly committed multiple extrajudicial killings […] Our findings call into question much of the assumed wisdom about military assistance programs […] The U.S. Congress and State Department must take action to ensure U.S. tax dollars no longer bankroll military units that bankroll executions in Colombia.” [emphasis added].

FOR concludes by recommending ten conditions for the continuance of any further U.S. assistance to Colombia, including close monitoring of units and personnel for human rights abuses as well as judging progress by actual conduct rather than promotions of personnel.

Though a “human rights certification” by the Secretary of State—which ostensibly tracks Colombia’s progress—once covered 100% of U.S. security assistance, it has since been lowered to apply to just 25% of monetary aid, rendering the stipulation ineffective at instituting any realistic change.

Human Rights Watch is calling for the U.S. to “enforce human rights conditions on military aid,” with suspension of all assistance should the country further breach policy. The group is also urging the International Criminal Court to hold Colombia under tighter scrutiny in ongoing prosecutions.

Claire Bernish writes for TheAntiMedia.org, where this article first appeared. Tune in! The Anti-Media radio show airs Monday through Friday @ 11pm Eastern/8pm Pacific.

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.

OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC

Amb Lee E Wanta

OUR CONSTITUTIONAL REPUBLIC

Sat Jun 27, 2015

PLEASE REVIEW AND NOTIFY OUR FELLOW AMERICANS TO READ
THE WEBSITE

WWW.EAGLEONETOWANTA.COM/ " EAGLE ONE " IS U.S. PRESIDENT RONALD W REAGAN
HAS TO THE MANDATED " OPERATION - STILLPOINT " TO LAWFULLY DE-STABILIZE THE EVIL EMPIRE [ U.S.S.R. ] TO ELIMINATE THE " COLD WAR " STATUS, BEING CONTINUALLY ORCHESTRATED BY THE " PUPPET MASTERS " - CORRUPT POLITICIANS - MILITARY INDUSTRIAL COMPLEX - AND THE SPECIAL INTERESTS
TO CLEARLY DESTROY OUR GREAT NATION _ AMERICA. WARMEST PERSONAL REGARDS, /S/ LEE E WANTA

AND NOW AVAILABLE AT AMAZON.COM WANTA!

Black Swan,White Hat THANK YOU

DOMESTIC and INTERNATIONAL PRESS RELEASE

 

Lee Wanta

www.eagleonetowanta.com/

 

The Principality of Snake Hill

Ambassador Lee Emil Wanta

Country Codes :    QS     QSH     923

Telefon No.  (202) 379 2904  x001

Amazon.com  :  WANTA! Black Swan, White Hat

 

http://classawebhosting.com/PRESS_RELEASE_27JUNE%2015.pdf

Out of Order: Thousands of ATMs have been Cleaned out In Greece

Sunday, June 28, 2015

Out of Order: Thousands of ATMs have been Cleaned out In Greece

By Joshua Krause

As the talks between the Greek government and their creditors slowly falls apart, the citizens of Greece are busy preparing for the worst. They don’t want to be caught off guard like they were during the last economic crash, and they certainly don’t want to end up like the people of Cyprus, and have their hard-earned savings arbitrarily taken from them.

So they’re doing everything they can to insulate themselves from the potential collapse of their financial system, which largely includes taking their money out of the system. Earlier today, sources in the banking industry told Reuters that over one-third of the ATMs in the country, have been completely cleaned out. Between 500 and 600 million Euros were withdrawn from the machines on Saturday, which managed to deplete over 2000 ATMs. Despite the alarming trend, the Greek government has claimed that everything is just hunky dory, and that there will be no capital controls imposed on bank accounts next week.

But the Greeks aren’t buying it, or at least they’re not taking any chances with what little money they’ve managed to accumulate since the last financial crisis. Shortly after Prime Minister Tsipras announced there would be a referendum on austerity, Greek citizens left their homes in droves and started lining up behind ATMs at around 2am. No matter what the government and the banks tell them, the Greeks clearly have no confidence in the system.

Joshua Krause is a reporter, writer and researcher at The Daily Sheeple, where this first appeared. He was born and raised in the Bay Area and is a freelance writer and author. You can follow Joshua’s reports at Facebook or on his personal Twitter. Joshua’s website is Strange Danger.

This article may be re-posted in full with attribution.