Thursday, October 29, 2015

Microwave Ovens: Remove Them From Your Kitchens … NOW!


Microwave Ovens: Remove Them From Your Kitchens … NOW!


cuptor-microunde-Ejxn

Thursday, October 29, 2015 5:05

TMR Editor’s Note:
 
It has long been said that most sickness begins in the kitchen.  Never have truer words been spoken.  


There are multiple reasons why this is the case ranging from improper food management to unhygienic cooking practices, from moldy refrigerators to contaminated countertops, from unhealthy food combinations to cooking old dead foods, from salmonella in the poultry products to E. coli in the beef products.  

With the introduction of the microwave oven into virtually every home in America, the kichen can now be considered a certified crime scene.  Yes, they’re that bad … and much worse than most will ever believe, so accustimed are they to nuking their food on a daily basis.

There’s a very good reason why they call it “NUKING”, yes?!

The Millennium Report
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

Microwave Ovens: Remove Them From Your Kitchens … NOW ! ! !

Microwave-Ovens-Are-Bad-For-Your-Health

TheHealthCoach.com

Should we end this coaching session right here and now? We’d like to but so many are attached to this little EMR & Microwave outputting beast. Truly, the Microwave Oven has become a permanent fixture in virtually every kitchen in America.

What an unmitigated health disaster this has created!
Let’s take a look at the evidence. Not the scientific evidence just yet. The real evidence known as nuked food.

How many times have you gone to a restaurant and been served a nuked ‘baked’ potato? A nuked potato has been cooked by a microwave oven, so why do they still call it baked?! It’s not baked in an oven; it’s micorwaved, which is a vastly different cooking method.

We don’t go to restaurants, and we don’t eat potatoes (they’re nightshades); nevertheless, in years past we have been out and about and have seen and heard about the thing they called a baked potato in many restaurants. 

Would you eat that ‘baked’ potato and if so, why would you do such a thing?!?!

Can we end this discussion now or must we go on.

We might as well open this little pandora’s box all the way since we came this far. Inasmuch as we found a health investigator who has done a great job at assembling some very authoritative evidence against the use of microwaves, we have taken the liberty of quoting her article “Microwaving — Dangers to Your Food and You?” quite liberally. As follows:




“In Dr. Lita Lee’s book, “Health Effects of Microwave Radiation – Microwave Ovens,” and in the March and September 1991 issues of Earthletter, she stated that every microwave oven leaks electro-magnetic radiation, harms food and converts substances cooked in it to dangerous organ-toxic and carcinogenic products. 

Micro ovens are far more harmful than previously imagined. Listed are the many findings of the German and Russian investigators. Here are just a few:

Cancer Causing Effects — Creation of a ‘binding effect’ to radioactivity in the atmosphere, creation of cancer-causing agents within protein hydrolysate compounds, malfunctions within the lymphatic systems, higher percentage of cancerous cells within the blood serum, cancer-causing free radicals, stomach and intestinal cancerous growths, with a gradual breakdown of the function of the digestive and excretive systems.

Decrease In Food Value — Microwave exposure caused significant decreases in the nutritive value of all foods researched. There was a decrease in bioavailability of B-complex vitamins, vitamin C, vitamin E, essential minerals and lipotropics in all foods, a loss of 60 to 90% of the vital energy field of all tested foods, and a marked acceleration of structural disintegration in all foods.

Biological Effects of Exposure — Breakdown of the human “life-energy field,” degeneration and circuit breakdowns within the front portion of the brain where thought and higher functions reside, loss of balance, long term cumulative loss of vital energy and long-lasting residual effects.

The same author has listed many other very good reasons “to throw out your Microwave oven.“:

1. Continually eating food processed from a microwave oven causes long term, permanent, brain damage by ‘shorting out” electrical impulses in the brain (de-polarizing or de-magnetizing the brain tissue).

2. The human body cannot metabolize (breakdown) the unknown by-products created in microwaved food.
 

3. Male and female hormone production is shut down and/or altered by continually eating microwaved foods.
 

4. The effects of microwaved food by-products are residual (long term, permanent) within the human body.
 

5. Minerals, vitamins, and nutrients of all microwaved food is reduced or altered so that the human body gets little or no benefit, or the human body absorbs altered compounds that cannot be broken down.
 

6. The minerals in vegetables are altered into cancerous free radicals when cooked in microwave ovens.
 

7. Microwaved foods cause stomach and intestinal cancerous growths (tumors). This may explain the rapid increased rate of colon cancer in America.
 

8. The prolonged eating of microwaved foods causes cancerous cells to increase in human blood.
 

9. Continual ingestion of microwaved food causes immune system deficiencies through lymph gland and serum alterations.
 

10. Eating microwaved food causes loss of memory, concentration, emotional instability, and a decrease of intelligence.” [1]

(Per Microwaving — Dangers to Your Food and You?)


Are you convinced yet?

Clearly the primary explanation for so many people refusing to listen to the voice of reason or the gut feeling of common sense concerning this extremely serious health matter, is the irresistible convenience that comes with using such a beast … 3 times per day, every day of the week, every month of the year, for life. Now that’s a life sentence, if ever we have seen one meted out to oneself!

Is that you? Hopefully not, because the unintended consequences, collateral damage and toxic side effects of microwave usage completely justify its exile to the global trash heap.


Just in case you still need more evidence we present more quoted material under the heading—”Various Studies on Microwave Cooking”

“The most controlled (and scary) research was almost suppressed from public knowledge before being published. Two Swiss researchers sequestered subjects under close scrutiny and blood tests were conducted after the subjects randomly ate food that was either microwaved or conventionally cooked. They found all sorts of potentially nasty stuff:

• Blood hemoglobin levels decreased significantly after ingesting microwaved foods, both total levels and the amount contained in each red blood cell.
 

• White blood cell levels tended to increase for no other reason than foods were microwaved.
 

• Microwaves altered protein molecules.
 

• LDL cholesterol (the ‘bad’ type) increased relative to HDL cholesterol (the ‘good’ type).

The researchers were immediately sued by the “Swiss Association of Dealers for Electroapparatuses for Households and Industry,” and one of the authors was convicted by the Swiss Federal Court of “interfering with commerce.” The fine was the equivalent of $65,000.”

For those who need still more we have the deleterious effects on human milk quoted below:

“In the journal Pediatrics, Apr. 1992, research appeared that warned that microwaving human milk, even at a low setting, can destroy some of its important disease-fighting capabilities. Pediatrician John A. Kerner, Jr. and his co-workers at Stanford University reported that breast milk that was microwaved lost lysozyme activity, antibodies, and fostered the growth of more potentially pathogenic bacteria. Adverse changes at such low temperatures suggest that microwaving itself may in fact cause some injury to the milk above and beyond the heating.”

And then there’s the problem it causes with vitamin B-12:

“A nutrition book published in 2003 states that for most nutrients, microwave heating minimizes losses compared to traditional cooking methods. Such is not the case for vitamin B-12. Microwave heating inactivates vitamin B-12. To preserve this vitamin, use the oven or stovetop instead of the microwave to cook meats and milk products (major sources of vitamin B-12). Many elderly are at risk of B-12 deficiency and shouldn’t microwave meat, milk, eggs or B-12 fortified foods, unless they only occasionally microwave or are getting B-12 in a supplement or fortified cereal.”

{Elizabeth Snyder, MS, RD, nutrition instructor, Southern Adventist University, Collegedale, Tennessee, in Weill Medical College of Cornell University, Food & Fitness Advisor newsletter, Mar. 2003}


“Few people realize that many of the vitamins in food are rapidly being destroyed by cooking. Even fewer know that microwaving destroys vitamins five times more quickly than does regular cooking. After just six minutes of microwaving, nearly half of the vitamin B-12 was destroyed when a Japanese dietitian measured the levels after microwaving. 

Vitamin B-12 was singled out for study since it is of vital importance in helping to prevent several major diseases that become more common as we grow older, including arteriosclerosis (cholesterol deposits in arteries), heart attacks and strokes. 

It is also now understood that B-12 deficiency is one of several factors that together often cause dementia (such as Alzheimer’s disease) in older people. Since cooking destroys vitamin B-12, and since older people have trouble absorbing it anyway, experts now recommend that adults take a 1 mg (1,000 micrograms) tablet of vitamin B-12 daily. This greatly overcomes the difficulty older people have in absorbing it. Even at this dosage, vitamin B-12 is harmless, inexpensive, and obtainable without a prescription.”

{Science News – vol. 153 #7:105, 1998, in Health Gazette, Apr. 1998}

 

The same author writes the following concerning “Micowave Cooking in Plastic Containers” - “Do not heat food containing fat in a microwave using plastic containers because the combination of fat, high heat and plastics releases dioxins and other toxins into the food and ultimately into your cells. Dioxins are carcinogens and highly toxic.

After researchers studied several commercial plastic containers, compounds such as methylbenzene, ethylbenzene, 1-octene, xylene, styrene and 1,4-dichlorobenzene were found in all of them. 

Also, the increased output power of modern microwave ovens can cause overheating.

Although cooking of raw foods in a microwave targets an acceptable end product for touch, taste and smell, the process does not address the microbiological safety of the cooked food. 

Microwave ovens from various commercial suppliers were used to cook naturally contaminated whole raw broiler and roaster chickens according to manufacturers’ instructions. Many of the roasters yielded visible Listeria bacteria after microwave cooking.

{Sources: Food Additive Contamination, June 2002; Emergency Medicine, (Fremantle) June 2001, Journal of Food Protection, Nov. 1998. “Nutrition Hints,” from Betty Kamen, PhD and Dr. Michael Rosenbaum, MD, Hint #870, June 2002}


One of the ways to decrease exposure to harmful chemicals, and all the scientists agree, is don’t microwave in plastic.

{Lindsey Berkson, author of the book “Hormone Deception, how everyday foods and products are disrupting your hormones, and how to protect yourself and your family,” on “People’s Pharmacy” PBS Radio program, September 27, 2003}”


Can you believe that so many cavalierly microwave (heat up) their foods and beverages in plastic containers?! As though plastic doesn’t melt or get so hot that it allows for migration of petroleum-based derivatives into the food or beverage contents???

We think that we have provided enough highly credible research for anyone reading this to dispose of their microwave. If you choose to keep it in operation, it may very well significantly contribute to the degradation of your health at the cellular level, tissue level, organ level as well as systemically.

We strongly believe that the rapid increase of so much chronic degenerative disease can be partially attributed to the frequent use of these DANGEROUS devices. They have become so ubiquitous that their detrimental health effects are surely being felt far and wide. 

The problem – as always – is that the scientific community has avoided this area of research like the plague. Undertaking such research studies would be the best way to demonstrate the direct correlation between microwave use and various medical makers and health stats.

Whereas GreenMedInfo has provided these excellent research studies, the dearth of such scientific research is clearly due to the many and diverse vested interests who ensure that few will likely ever be undertaken … to the great detriment of both individual and collective health.

In the meantime, you, the cook, and you, the eater, can easily avoid the radiation from the device, as well as the negative consequences of eating microwaved food. We have managed to do so for well over 25 years with virtually no inconvenience. However, we’re not at all shy about asking the waitress to ensure that none of our food will be nuked on that rare occasion that we find ourselves at a restaurant.

You can do the same, if you believe what you’ve read here today.

With every good wish,
The Health Coach


Microwave

Author’s Note:

You know, we dealt very little with the EMR and microwave effects in the ambient living environment when these little beasts are turned on and humming. This is likewise a HUGE issue which poses it’s own list of serious health concerns as presented by many researchers.


How many times have you read that those with pacemakers should not be around microwaves? Given what most of us now know about electro-pollution and the many long term effects of stray voltage, ‘normal’ emr output and 2-way emr overload, do we really need to go there?


For those uninitiated into this realm, we will take this up in our next health blog on microwave ovens.


A Special Warning to those who nuke water:

Water, by it’s very nature, is extremely impressionable. It possesses different qualities, some of which are far too subtle to measure, but nevertheless important for health reasons.


When water is microwaved, it is profoundly and fundamentally altered on an energetic level which produces chaos in its energy field. How will this translate when nuked tea and coffee water is regularly drank over years? We don’t know. And that’s the problem, we just don’t know.


You might peruse the following article written by our good friends at Natural Society for some additional understanding.


The Dangerous Truth Behind Microwaves (Updated)


Telling Personal Vignette:

The Health Coach once worked for a company in Atlanta, GA in the mid-90s. For almost two straight years the owner of the firm was seen to microwave his lunch (a different frozen dinner every day) every afternoon, without exception. Immediately after eating the ‘meal’, he would go into a coughing fit, each and every day, without exception. Some of us would sit there within earshot listening to the terrible discomfort which he suffered, as endless coughing sounds could be heard through his office door. This happened 5 days a week and gave us much to ponder about what might be causing such an uncontrollable fit of coughing.


Needless to say, those of us who were health conscious never went near that microwave. He did pass away shortly thereafter as a result of heart disease, diabetes and other chronic ailments.


Source
[1] “Microwaving — Dangers to Your Food and You?” found at June Russell’s Health Facts
(All quoted material throughout this article has this same source)

Health Disclaimer:

All content found at The Health Coach is for information purposes only. Therefore, the information on this website is not a substitute for professional medical care and should not be construed as either medical diagnosis or treatment. All information contained herein ought to be considered within the context of an individual’s overall health status and prescribed treatment plan.


Since The Health Coach does not diagnose, treat, mitigate, cure, or heal any type of disease or medical condition, the information contained at this website is not intended to provide specific physical, mental, emotional or psychological health advice.


It is entirely the reader’s decision to act or not act on any information at The Health Coach. Therefore, we fully invoke the HOLD HARMLESS clause for those who are responsible for putting any of this information into practical use and application.


© 2012 The Health Coach
Originally posted at: http://thehealthcoach1.com/?p=330

Microwave Ovens: Scientifically Proven To Be Dangerous And Deadly | The Millennium Report
http://beforeitsnews.com/alternative/2015/10/microwave-ovens-remove-them-from-your-kitchens-now-3235562.html?currentSplittedPage=0 

Middle School Teacher Tells Students to Deny God


Middle School Teacher Tells Students to Deny God Is Real or Receive Failing Grade

Joshua Krause
The Daily Sheeple
October 27th, 2015


christian cross

We all know that in most public schools in America, talking about religion is now strictly verboten. Those who pushed for this policy have always argued that it would be a violation of the separation of church and state. However, the argument goes both ways. If it’s going to be inappropriate for a teacher to push his or her religion on students in a public school, it should also be wrong for a teacher advocate atheism in the same forum.

One Texas middle school teacher who has yet to be named, is now in hot water for doing just that. According to her students from West Memorial Junior High School, they were given an assignment that challenged their faith. “We were asked to take a poll to say whether God is fact, opinion or a myth and she told anyone who said fact or opinion was wrong and God was only a myth.” 

Kids who tried to argue with the teacher were told they would get in trouble, and those who expressed their belief in God for the assignment, were told they would receive a failing grade

“Another student asked the teacher if we could put what we believe in the paper, and she said we could, but you would fail the paper if you do.”

The teacher’s actions were brought to the attention of the principle by the mother of one of her students, 7th grader Jordan Wooley. The girl has since testified before the school board, who are currently investigating the incident. 

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/teacher-tells-student-to-deny-god-is-real-or-receive-failing-grade_102015 


Obama Sends Destroyer - China Vows Military Response


It’s On: Obama Sends Destroyer To Chinese Islands 

China Vows Military Response


Lassen_0
For anyone who might still be somehow unaware, the US is currently in a superpower staring match with both Russia and China.  




Zero Hedge
October 26th, 2015


The conflict in Syria has put Moscow back on the geopolitical map (so to speak), creating an enormous amount of tension with Washington whose regional allies have been left to look on in horror as Russian airstrikes and an Iranian ground incursion dash hopes of ousting President Bashar al-Assad.

Meanwhile, in The South China Sea, Beijing has built 3,000 acres of new sovereign territory atop reefs in the Spratlys and although the reclamation effort itself isn’t unique, the scope of it most certainly is and Washington’s friends in the South Pacific are crying foul.

Beijing has continually insisted that it doesn’t intend to use the islands as military outposts, but the construction of runways and ports seems to tell a different story and so, Washington felt compelled to check things out over the summer by sending a Poseidon spy plane complete with a CNN crew to the area. Once the PLA spotted the plane the situation escalated quickly with the Chinese Navy telling US pilots to “Go Now!”

After that, an intense war of words developed with Defense Secretary Ash Carter insisting that the US would sail and fly anywhere it pleased and Beijing assuring the US that sailing within 12 nautical miles of the islands would prompt a harsh response from the PLA.

For weeks, the US was rumored to have been planning a freedom of navigation exercise in the Spratlys which, as we’ve pointed out several times this month, amounts to sailing by the islands just to see if China will shoot.
Now, according to CNN, Obama has given the green light and the ships may sail within 24 hours: 


  Jim Sciutto @jimsciutto
Just in: @USNavy prepared to sail w/i 12mi of China's manmade islands in "w/i 24hrs", has POTUS approval -Def. Official

The US navy is poised to start freedom of navigation operations in the South China Sea in a high stakes effort to push back against Chinese territorial claims over artificial islands in the disputed waters.

In a move that will enrage Beijing, the USS Lassen, a guided-missile destroyer, will sail inside the 12-nautical mile zones of two man-made islands — Subi and Mischief reefs — that China has built in the contested Spratly Island chain. A senior US defence official said it would sail through the area in the early hours of Tuesday morning.
China has repeatedly warned that it would not tolerate any effort to violate what it considers its territory. Earlier this month, a senior Chinese naval officer said the People’s Liberation Army would hand a “head-on blow” to any foreign forces that violated Chinese sovereignty. His comments came after the Financial Times reported that the US was poised to launch its operations.
The manoeuvre will mark the first time since 2012 that the US navy has sailed through the 12-nautical mile zone surrounding any islands claimed by China. It is aimed at demonstrating that Washington does not recognise any territorial claims over artificial islands in the South China Sea.
It’s also worth noting that should the US manage to get away with this without sparking a shooting war with the Chinese, it now looks as though Washington is leaning toward making this a regular patrol. 

Here’s a bit of color from Reuters out over the weekend:
A range of security experts said Washington’s so-called freedom of navigation patrols would have to be regular to be effective, given Chinese ambitions to project power deep into maritime Southeast Asia and beyond.
“This cannot be a one-off,” said Ian Storey, a South China Sea expert at Singapore’s Institute of Southeast Asian Studies.
“The U.S. navy will have to conduct these kinds of patrols on a regular basis to reinforce their message.”
But China would likely resist attempts to make such U.S. actions routine, some said, raising the political and military stakes. China’s navy could for example try to block or attempt to surround U.S. vessels, they said, risking an escalation.
Not to put too fine a point on it, but this borders on the insane. Here we have both Washington and Beijing risking an outright military confrontation over what amount to a couple of sandcastles and while there’s probably some truth to the contention that China has plans for the islands that go beyond growing plants, building lighthouses, and raising pigs, it’s not as though the PLA is going to invade The Philippines so at the end of the day, this looks like another example of what Vladimir Putin recently suggested is evidence that the world is losing its collective mind.

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/its-on-obama-sends-destroyer-to-chinese-islands-china-vows-military-response_102015



‘Either by the Bible or the Bayonet’



‘Either by the Bible or the Bayonet’




On May 28th, 1849, Robert C. Winthrop (1809-1894), a descendant of Governor John Winthrop, first governor of Massachusetts Bay Colony, served as a Representative and Senator from Massachusetts and Speaker of the United States House of Representatives.  He also served as the president of the Massachusetts Bible Society for several years where he advocated that Christian morality was the necessary condition of a free society.

The following is from an address he gave at the Annual Meeting of the Massachusetts Bible Society in Boston:
All societies of men must be governed in some way or other. The less they may have of stringent State Government, the more they must have of individual self-government. The less they rely on public law or physical force, the more they must rely on private moral restraint. Men, in a word, must necessarily be controlled, either by a power within them, or by a power without them; either by the word of God, or by the strong arm of man; either by the Bible, or by the bayonet. It may do for other countries and other governments to talk about the State supporting religion. Here, under our own free institutions, it is Religion which must support the State.1

The State, the media, the entertainment industry, the schools, the courts, and even some churches have said that God can no longer be a topic of discussion. To believe in God is said to be anti-science, anti-logic, and anti-logic, therefore it has no place in a discussion of personal, social, and political morality.

   Robert C. Winthrop
robert c. winthropThe father of the Umpqua Community College shooter could not understand how one person could or should own 13 guns, all bought legally. His guns were found at the college. How can this be since the college is a “gun-free zone”? Guns aren’t the problem, and anti-gun laws are not the solution. People are the problem.

Take a look at the UCC’s course catalog. There are numerous courses on evolution. The shooter and the people he killed (we can’t say murdered) evolved. One group of evolved cells killed other groups of evolved cells. In what way are they significant in a matter-only world of evolved stuff with no ultimate judge to determine if any act is good or evil?

But in a world where evil and good can be accounted for, some sense can be made of murder -- killing an image-bearer of God -- since it was an early sin (Gen. 4). Life has meaning in such a world. That's why we grieve for the dead.

But given the operating assumptions of atheism there is no accounting for either good or evil. Self-government under God is no longer an acceptable standard of belief. Who says I should be moral? Why says I can't hurt someone? You? the group? The State?

There are probably 100 million or more guns in the United States. Gun stores are filled with guns and ammunition.

There are people who have more than 13 guns, and yet 99.99999 percent of gun owners do not murder anyone.
While Ian Mercer did not come out and blame the guns for what his son had done, he came close:

“Even people that believe in the right to bear arms, what right do you have to take people's lives?" Mercer said. "That's what guns are: the killers. It's as simple as that. It's black and white. What do you want a gun for?”

There is no 'right' to murder someone, whether it’s with a gun, knife, poison, car, drowning, antifreeze, hanging, bombs, airplanes, or club.


Gun meme_02Guns aren’t killers. The people who load them and fire them are the killers in the same way a person who drives a car while intoxicated and kills someone is the killer. Neither the car nor the alcohol killed anyone.

What do we want a gun for? To protect us from people like his son. Does anyone actually think that getting rid of guns will stop evil people from murdering?

The day may come when our nation will become a national gun-free zone. What then? Will human nature change? It won't. We will then be at the mercy of a government that possesses guns and criminals who will break the law to get their hands on guns.
  1. Robert Winthrop, Addresses and Speeches on Various Occasions (Boston: Little, Brown & Co., 1852), 172. [image: http://s.w.org/images/core/emoji/72x72/21a9.png]
http://godfatherpolitics.com/26035/either-by-the-bible-or-the-bayonet/

Proof Of Obama In Homosexual Drag (repost per request)


Proof Of Obama In Homosexual Drag  Astounding Proof Of US President Acting Out As a Homosexual Pervert

 

Mia Marie Pope Ousts Barack Obama as a Foreigner on the Manning Report

 
Listen carefully to the video of Mia Marie Pope interviewed by Pastor James David Manning.  Mia Marie Pope, who was a high school friend of Barack Obama (aka Barry Soetoro) in Hawaii during the 1970s, says that Obama identified himself as a foreigner in high school and was known as a crack-smoking homosexual.

Mia was Obama’s friend in high school. Mia Pope evokes Obama wearing drag outfits. Pope says that she actually saw Obama dress up as a transvestite. She remarked that it was during the era of the Rocky Horror Picture Show, starring Tim Curry, that this took place. At 18:08 . “I actually saw him in other attire similar to that picture.” (19m18s).  



Proof is emerging that the picture of Barack Obama dressed in leather drag is genuine and not photoshopped as many claim it to be:
 
 
 

  

  

 


How to build an off the grid home, for essentially free....


 
 

How To Build An Off-Grid Home,  For Essentially Free....

Image result for montanaliving.com   STRAW HOME
 
 
There is nothing quite as promising and exciting as purchasing bare acreage with plans to turn it into a working homestead.
But building a traditional home, even one considered to be small by most standards – say, a 2 bedroom, 1 bath — is extremely expensive. Many people go this route not realizing that there are alternative ways of building a home that can save you money — and even lower house maintenance costs over time. The money you save can be used for interior designing and decorating, or allotted to other projects on the homestead.
Here are three inexpensive housing materials that can be used for off-grid and other self-sufficient homes.
1. Straw Bales
Straw is a common building material in some parts of the world but generally it’s being used for thatched roofs or added to a clay-like mix. Whole bales are actually a great inexpensive housing material for creating solid, well-insulated walls. You then can add a thatched roof or go with something more traditional like metal.
Discover More Than 1,000 Secrets For A Healthier, Safer Off-Grid Life!
Building with straw bales is ridiculously easy, as they can be used just like bricks. Usually these bales are light enough in weight that one person can move them, although two people is a better idea. They are safer to work with when it comes to climbing up a ladder to stack as well. Due to the thickness and density of good bales, they are great for keeping heat and cold out — thereby lowering energy costs. Ironically, straw bale construction is more fire resistant than traditional building materials, again, due to the density.
Straw bale construction is best for very dry climates, and constant high humidity can cause structural issues. Construction must also be done during warm, dry weather, as you do not want any moisture getting into the bales while building. Naturally, you also need to be certain that the bales you use have been properly dried.
2. Cob
There is nothing quite as picturesque and quaint as a cob cottage nestled into the countryside. Cob is one alternative building material that uses some straw, as alluded to above, along with earth and sand to create a moldable clay-like blend. This mix can then be used to build structures with just your bare hands. Adobe is essentially the same thing as cob but instead the mixture is formed into bricks and dried in the sun before being used.
Cob and adobe are both very strong building materials that are fairly versatile in terms of where they can be used, as you can tell by the popularity of this clay-like mix in wet areas of the UK to hot, dry climates in Africa. Cob is more structurally sound, too. Both are particularly suited for regions that experience a lot of inclement weather and earthquakes.
A downside of working with cob is that it can be quite labor- and time-intensive. Cob structures will also need time to properly cure and dry. Adobe is quicker to work with after the bricks have been dried. If you are concerned about the labor involved building with cob or adobe, you may want to just do the interior walls and structures with it. A very good mix of natural building materials would be straw bale exterior walls and cob/adobe interior walls.
New Rugged Portable Power Unit Will Jump Start Your Car, Power Virtually Anything — And Even Air Up Your Tires!
3. Earth Bags

Image result for montanaliving.com   STRAW HOME

Earth bags, sometimes called sand bags, are another way to build a solid, structurally sound home. They are not as popular as some other natural building materials but are worth exploring. Using earth bags is similar to cob in the sense that you don’t really need special skills or tools. You’re essentially filling bags with earth or sand, stacking them like bricks to form your walls and tamping them down.
Earth-bag buildings are resistant to fires and to many natural disasters like flooding, hurricanes and earthquakes. Due to the density and materials filling the bags, rodents will not be a concern, which is a worry some people have about straw bale buildings. For the most moisture resistant building, use polypropylene bags, but you can really use any type of recycled bag for building, which naturally helps reduce waste.
A downside of this material is that the structure won’t be totally biodegradable, since bags are being used. The biggest disadvantage of using earth bags is how much labor is involved. Moving buckets of earth, filling bags and especially stacking can be very tiring. You will definitely want the help of a team of people if you plan to get the building done in a timely fashion.
These three building alternatives are just the tip of the iceberg in terms of what inexpensive materials are out there for building. There are a ton of resources on the Internet about using natural or alternatives materials for building homes. Homes made from natural or recycled materials have a lot of character, and when built well will outlast pretty much any traditionally built home. They offer far superior insulation and less negative impact on the environment. Using natural materials also eliminates the dangers of toxins that are so prevalent in traditional building materials.

Subject: The way airline pilots should talk.....






Subject: The way airline pilots should talk.....
 

US General: Iran has fewer than 2,000 troops in Syria





 

US General: Iran has fewer than 2,000 troops in Syria

By GPD on October 28, 2015
Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff. Photo: AFP
Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff.
WASHINGTON DC—The United States military believes that Iran has fewer than 2,000 troops in Syria fighting alongside government forces, said a top US general Tuesday.
Reuters news agency quoted Gen. Joseph Dunford, chairman of the Joint Chiefs of Staff that in addition to its troops in Syria Iran also has more than 1,000 soldiers in Iraq.
“I think there’s more than 1,000 that are on the ground in Iraq,” Dunford said. “In Syria, we think the numbers are probably something less than 2,000.”
Gen. Dunford said that the number of Iranian troops in Iraq has changed over time.
Hussein Salami, deputy commander in chief of Iran’s Revolutionary Guards told the media on Monday that his country has four levels of military presence in Syria: leadership, tactical, technical and operational.
According to Persian news reports, around 20 Iranian soldiers have been killed in Syria in less than a week, mainly near the city of Aleppo.
Deputy commander in chief Salami said that the cause of the rising death toll among his troops is their active participation in recent offensives.
Hundreds of Iranian soldiers and voluntary fighters have traveled to Syria in the last four years, calling themselves Defenders of the Zainab Shrine, an important Shiite religious site in Damascus.