The US In A CONSTATE State Of Emergency

REICHSTAG FIRE FOREVER

THE US IN A CONSTANT STATE OF 'EMERGENCY' 

Cheryl Pass

I was looking for information on Executive Orders to find out if there is a remedy to them.  As usual what I thought would be simple became a maize of complications.  

I was side-tracked over to another facet of the issue. Actually, it should be simple, if only our 'government' was working properly.  But it isn't ...and you know it isn't.  

I've been asking myself how the occupants of the White House are getting away with Executive Orders and why these orders are never challenged.  I think I stumbled upon the answer. 

 

According to Wikipedia, in 1976 a National Emergencies Act was passed to stop the possibility of never ending states of emergency.  The Act supposedly set a limit of two years on any state of emergency declared by the POTUS. This also gave Congress the ability to require the POTUS to go through formalities to declare a National Emergency.  Unfortunately, it did nothing to stop any POTUS from continuing a never ending state of emergency.  It is an ultimate power grab by the Executive Branch.  

Here is the bad news:

The United States has been in a state of national emergency continuously for over 30 years, since the Carter administration invoked it premised on the "situation in Iran".

In November 2012, 'president' Barack Obama informed Congress that the State of National Emergency in effect since November 14, 1979 will be extended another year.

The National Emergencies Act grants various powers to the 'president' during times of emergency, and was intended to prevent a 'president' from declaring a 'state of emergency' of indefinite duration.

So all that has to happen to keep the Executive Branch on "Operation Overreach" is a little statement from the POTUS that he extends the State of National Emergency for one more year.  How hard is that?  

Every year, when the deadline is up, the POTUS just renews ..sort of like your magazine subscriptions.  No one stops him.  Obviously the National Emergencies Act doesn't do anything to prevent the constant, never ending state of emergency in the U.S.  

Additionally, Wikipedia says that this National Emergencies Act was to prevent the Executive Branch from going over the limits when declaring rights suspended. It was due in part to concern that a declaration of "emergency" for one purpose should not invoke every possible executive emergency power that Congress in 1976 passed the National Emergencies Act. 

Among other provisions, this act requires the 'president' to declare formally a national emergency and to specify the statutory authorities to be used under such a declaration. Some how, I don't think that Act had any effect on anything...but I guess someone tried to rein in the POTUS with that Act. 

Linked on that Wikipedia page is a reference to the Reichstag Fire Decree in 1933 in Germany, a decree which gave Hitler ultimate powers without consent from the Reichstag (the German version of a parliament). 

The Reichstag Fire Decree (German: Reichstagsbrandverordnung) is the common name of the Decree of the Reich President for the Protection of People and State (German: Verordnung des Reichspräsidenten zum Schutz von Volk und Staat) issued by German
President Paul von Hindenburg in direct response to the Reichstag fire of 27 February 1933.

The decree nullified many of the key civil liberties of German citizens.

With Nazis in powerful positions in the German government, the decree was used as the legal basis of imprisonment of anyone considered to be opponents of the Nazis, and to suppress publications not considered "friendly" to the Nazi cause.  (Sound familiar for here in the united States?!)

The decree is considered by historians to be one of the key steps in the establishment of a one- party Nazi state in Germany.  (Same is happening right now in the united States.)

As I read through the Reichstag event, and that last sentence about "one party Nazi state," I thought about the 'presidents' from both parties in the U.S. who have continued this emergency power for themselves.  

Here, it doesn't seem to matter which party is in control. They are both intent on concentrating that power into the Executive Branch.  

Why do we even have a Congress?  Is it all window dressing?  As far as I can see lately, Congress doesn't do anything much other than give cover to the Executive Branch. They take the cues from the White House and then fund laws and regulatory agencies to choke off freedoms and rights.   

As Obama said recently, "If they won't do it, I will." What gave him that idea?  The State of  National Emergency, constant and never ending.  

Congress is impotent.  I think they have rendered themselves impotent.  I don't know why they even show up ...except of course to get the benefits and the ego massages. 

Well, that's my revelation for today, folks.  Constant and never ending state of emergency...by design.  

No wonder we are all worn out.  You can't stay in a high state of emergency all of the time without a break.  

Even the most hardened, trained soldiers have to have R&R sometimes.  But we aren't getting that break.   

Our rights and freedoms are under attack constantly, and this explains, at least partially, why. 

Carry on soldiers!
   

http://freedomoutpost.com/2013/04/reichstag-fire-forever-the-us-in-a-constant-state-of-emergency/

Makes perfect sense to me! Thanksgiving 'government' pie

Controversial Sandy Hook Book Banned by Amazon

MORE CENSORSHIP BY U.S.A. CABAL OF FACTS AND TRUTH!!!!
CONTROVERSIAL SANDY HOOK BOOK BANNED BY AMAZON!
NOW PROVIDED IN PDF FORM FOR FREE!  LINK HERE!



Author Jim Fetzer's 425-page book Nobody Died at Sandy Hook had been reportedly removed from online bookstore Amazon. 

"The book is too good," an intelligence expert had  allegedly told Fetzer. "It has the potential to bring down the Obama administration. They are going to do everything that they can to suppress it–so don't be surprised when it happens!"
 
Fetzer and his co-editor Mike Palecek received the following notification from CreateSpace, the company that provides publishing for Amazon: 

"What could be more telling than that they have taken the book down but cannot explain the reasons for suppressing it, which of course they had to have had in advance of taking it down," Fetzer says. "Just how dumb are we all supposed to be?"

What's most interesting is the book was up for a short time and sold around 500 copies. It even received several ratings from both actual purchasers and those with an opinion about what they had not read. 

Additionally, Amazon still has Fetzer and Palecek's book And I suppose we didn't go to the moon, either?: The Beatles, the Holocaust, and other mass illusions (Save the World, Resist the Empire). Isn't that just as controversial?

Amazon also carries a variety of titles that put forth various theories concerning Sandy Hook, The Moon Landing and, of course, the JFK assassination, so it does make one wonder why this particular book was targeted. 

What is the actual violation of the guidelines? 

I contacted CreateSpace for a comment, and as of the writing of this article, they have not provided a response. 

On the opposite end of the conversation, is a trained investigator named Dr. Leland Benton, whose book Was Sandy Hook a Hoax?: Sandy Hook Hoax Allegations are Disturbing! (Forensic Investigation) (Volume 1) is also posted at Amazon. 

Dr. Benton writes, "Recent allegations and a plethora of YouTube videos have arisen that the events at Sandy Hook are all a hoax. On the surface, this is quite disturbing to me for two reasons. If the allegations are true then we as a nation are confronting another serious problem; and if they are false, then this is a very cruel burden to place on the grieving families. 

As a trained investigator, I will look dispassionately at both sides and allow my readers to decide for themselves. I was taught that the best lie is always sandwiched between two truths. On the surface, what is to be gained if the allegations prove to be true? And conversely, what is to be gained if the allegations prove to be false? Where is the winner in all of this?"

Personally, I think these are good questions to ask. Who does benefit in the end? One might ask that when one looks back to history how Adolf Hitler burned his own Reichstag and wonder if our own government is not engaged in similar activity, especially a government that used the incident to immediately push for a national attack upon the rights of its citizens.

"The book delegitimizes the 'government' of the United States, in particular, the Obama administration, which cannot withstand the exposure of its techniques of disinformation," Fetzer wrote concerning his allegations in the book. "Confronted with this rude development, Mike and I decided to make the book available to the public for free." 

While I'm not convinced of every assertion of many of the theories surrounding Sandy Hook, one does have to confess that there are several anomalies that have not been addressed properly. That doesn't mean that no one died or that it didn't take place. It just means there are anomalies, and no one should be afraid to ask questions and government shouldn't be afraid to be transparent with its people and answer those questions. 

On the other hand, it doesn't disprove the assertion of those who remain unconvinced that Sandy Hook was nothing more than a false flag event to push a gun control agenda. 

As a result of Amazon pulling the book, Fetzer and Palecek have made the book available for free download. You can download the book for free by clicking here.

About Tim Brown

Tim Brown is an author and Editor at FreedomOutpost.com, SonsOfLibertyMedia.com, GunsInTheNews.com and TheWashingtonStandard.com. He is husband to his "more precious than rubies" wife, father of 10 "mighty arrows", jack of all trades, Christian and lover of liberty. He resides in the U.S. occupied Great State of South Carolina. Tim is also an affiliate for the Joshua Mark 5 AR/AK hybrid semi-automatic rifle. Follow Tim on Twitter.

View all posts by Tim Brown →

BEWARE! TIME TO SWITCH OFF MICROSOFT! Windows 10 Is Malware; Deletes Users' Programs

Windows 10 Is Malware - It Deletes Users' Programs

 

Written by  C. Mitchell Shaw

Wednesday, 25 November 2015

Windows 10 seems to be Microsoft's deliberate attempt at creating the most intrusive operating system ever. If that is the goal, the software giant from Redmond, Washington, is succeeding. 

It seems that every new update brings the newest iteration of Windows increasingly closer to giving Microsoft total control over the way users can operate their own computers. The most recent update makes that abundantly clear.

Malware is defined by The American Heritage Dictionary of the English Language, 4th edition as:

Malicious computer software that interferes with normal computer functions or sends personal data about the user to unauthorized parties over the Internet.

While computer users typically think of that definition applying to viruses, it unfortunately fits Windows 10 — and increasingly Windows 7, 8, and 8.1 — very well. What else do you call an operating system that reports back to its developers supplying them with personally identifiable information about you including 
your name
e-mail address
postal address
phone number
passwords
password hints
age 
gender 
browsing history
address book
calendar
contents of your e-mails
access to all your files 
including pictures
videos
documents
anything else stored on your hard drive

What about an operating system that, while doing all that, hides updates from you,  will not provide you information about them, and  installs them even when you have told it not to? 

What about that same operating system being designed in such a way that you cannot even turn off these settings?

If none of that rises to the level of defining Windows 10 (and, because of updates, Windows 7, 8, and 8.1) as malware, the most recent news certainly does. 

The New American has previously reported on the outrageous Microsoft Services Agreement and accompanying documents that must be agreed to before any Microsoft product or service can be used. 

We explained:

Few will ever read the terms of these documents since they span some 40,000 words and would run 110 pages if printed. As is to be expected, most of the terms are written in legalese and are not overly easy to understand. 

There are some parts of the terms that users need to be aware of, though, because agreeing to them grants Microsoft the right to read, save, and share anything stored on or accessed using any computer running Microsoft Windows as well as any computer using Microsoft products or services.

The Microsoft Services Agreement also gives the software empire permission to not only install whatever software it chooses on your computer, but also to delete whatever software it chooses from your computer. 

Microsoft announced its Windows 10 November update with great fanfare. What the company did not tell users was that the update would give Microsoft the ability to reach into their computers and remove software that the company deemed either unstable (based on its own criteria) or pirated (based on its own assumptions). Just whose computer is it, anyway?
 
Venture Beat reports that, after receiving the update, many users complained that software they had installed before the update was deleted and they were notified that it was "not supported." When they simply reinstalled the software, it worked just as it had before. So far the deletion of programs has been mostly limited to "hardware monitoring tools CPU-Z and Speccy as well as the AMD Catalyst Control Center for tweaking your Radeon graphics cards," according to Venture Beat. 

So, it looks as if it impacts only users of higher-end computers such as those used for gaming. But that does not mean it will not be coming soon to a workstation near you.

As Venture Beat reported:

The company has previously explained to GamesBeat that it would remove software that it considers dangerous. That includes not just programs that will cause issues with Windows 10 but potentially apps that may steal your information or infect your system. That language is in Microsoft's terms of service.

"The Microsoft Services Agreement allows Microsoft to change or discontinue certain apps or content where we deem your security is at risk," a Microsoft spokesperson told GamesBeat in August. "Software that is pirated or botted places the safety and security of our customers at risk, including a higher risk of malware, fraud, public exposure of personal information, and poor performance or feature malfunction. 

We remain committed to protecting our customers from the risks of non-genuine software and protecting the intellectual property of developers of all types of content."

Of course none of this answers why valid software packages were removed from user's computers or why — if the programs were "not supported" — the users were able to reinstall them without problem.

All the recent heavy-handedness from Microsoft has many computer users seeking other operating systems. Many are looking to Apple and the Mac OS. 

Others who want more freedom and control over their computers are looking increasingly to one of the many distributions of Linux.

As this writer noted last year, the best way to protect your systems against surveillance by both overreaching governments and nosy corporations is to replace Windows with Linux and apply several software tools that are both free and freely available. 

Microsoft's new policies are making it increasingly easy to convince people to do just that.

In the interest of fairness, the writer of this article has been a Linux user for several years and does not use any Microsoft products or services. This article was written on his System76 Bonobo Extreme running Ubuntu 14.04 using LibreOffice 4.2.

http://www.thenewamerican.com/tech/computers/item/22026-windows-10-deletes-users-programs

    Domenic and Annie Johansson

WND EXCLUSIVE

Homeschool boy in government custody 7 YEARS

 

Parents fight officials in 'last hope' to see own son,                                                                      now 14

 
Bob Unruh
WND
Nov 26 2015


When Domenic Johansson was seven years old, he and his parents, Christer and Annie, were moving from their home in Sweden to his mother’s native India. They actually were seated aboard the jet waiting to take off.

Then Swedish police, dispatched by social workers infuriated over the family’s homeschooling, boarded the airliner, took Domenic by force and put him in the custody of the nation’s social services agency.  He’s been there since.   And he hasn’t even seen his parents since 2010, after social workers torpedoed what had been sporadic and supervised times together. (How many times has this child been raped?  Abused?  Lied to about his parents?)

Now that nation’s Supreme Court is being asked to review what has been described as a “vicious” attack on the family, and supporters of the Johanssons say the rest of the world can chime in.

Officials with the Home School Legal Defense Association have confirmed that a lawyer working with the Johanssons is filing an appeal with the Swedish Supreme Court, aided by both the HSLDA and the international Alliance Defending Freedom.

They say those who are interested in justice in the case can contribute by sending a message to the court regarding case O-4373-15 with the request that the judges grant the family’s appeal.

Contact information for the court and other details have been posted online by the HSLDA.

The organization suggests that people point out to the court that “The United Nations Declaration on Human Rights recognizes the family as the fundamental group unit of society and entitled to protection of (and from) the state.”

“Now we are asking for your help in what may be their last hope and appeal to ever be reunited with their son,” HSLDA said in a new report on the situation.

HSLDA outlined the history of the case: Social workers enraged by homeschooling, which was legal in Sweden at the time, used police to abduct the little boy, and then added claims of issues with his vaccinations and teeth to the complaint. Then social workers, aided by the local courts, simply kept Domenic.

“Imagine – living just miles from your child but being prevented by government authorities from seeing him at all – for years,” HSLDA said. “This is the tragic story of the Johansson family who were homeschooling in Sweden when they decided to move to India, Annie Johansson’s home country. The three of them were seated on a jetliner in June 2009 when, moments before takeoff, police and social workers boarded the plane and seized Domenic.”

The HSLDA said the initial explanation was the family’s homeschooling.

“Later they [officials] said the parents had neglected Domenic by failing to keep his vaccinations up to date and to have cavities in his teeth,” HSLDA said. (BS)

After years of court fights, in December 2012, the courts transferred the custody rights for Domenic to the state, and the European Court of Human Rights has rejected appeals submitted to its officials. (Sounds just like here in the States - same criminal court system, same criminal 'government' system - NWO owners and we the people worldwide are slaves from our birth certificates)

Domenic’s parents now have left the “tenuous thread of hope” with a petition filed by Ruby Harrold-Claesson, a human rights attorney and chief of the Nordic Committee for Human Rights.

Her appeal is to the Swedish Supreme Court.

“This is a tragic case. Unfortunately, it’s not the only one I’ve dealt with in Sweden, but it is very tragic,” she told HSLDA. “Our previous victory in a lower court was so diametrically opposed to the appeals court’s ruling that this appeal should be heard. The Swedish court culture is vicious to families who are caught in it. I’m doing all I can for this family, but it is very difficult.”

“The Johansson case represents every parent’s worst nightmare,” said Mike Donnelly, the head of HSLDA’s global outreach. “Domenic should have been returned to his parents years ago, but the Swedish social services machine is pitiless and unrelenting. I can’t even imagine the pain and suffering this family has endured. HSLDA and our allies at ADF are committed to helping this family, but the outcome is doubtful absent a miracle.

“Even if we win, the damage done to this family by the Swedish state is unimaginable. We need our friends to pray and show solidarity with the Johanssons as we try to get the attention of the Swedish court,” he said.

A recent ruling from the international human rights body said, “The applicants had failed in their care of [Domenic], both physical and psychological."  It claimed Domenic “had not been allowed to go to school” and was “isolated.”

But WND reported legal experts argue Swedish officials violated multiple human rights enshrined in international treaties to which the Swedish government is a party: the right of parents to direct the education of their children, family life, due process, travel and more.

“The seizure of the child without a valid court order, from a plane he was lawfully entitled to be on, the detention by the state in foster care with virtually zero contact with his family and finally the termination of parental rights is a clear violation of international human rights standards,” HSLDA founder and Chairman Michael Farris, who holds a master of law degree in public international law from the University of London, said earlier.

Swedish officials several times have declined to respond to WND questions.

When the family tried to leave Sweden in 2009 for India, the mother’s homeland, armed police stormed the plane and abducted young Domenic without a warrant or court order.  Numerous experts and attorneys have described the incident as a brazen example of “state-napping.”

When one court decision was released in Sweden in favor of the parents, government officials simply kept Domenic in custody until they were able to get it reversed.

Legal experts from around the world have told WND that the pretexts cited to seize Domenic do not stand up to scrutiny, especially because homeschooling was legal in Sweden at the time, and the right to homeschool is guaranteed under multiple human rights treaties.

“No legitimate justification has ever been produced to defend the seizure or the ongoing custody of the boy,” HSLDA said.

As WND has been reporting for years, the Johansson family is hardly alone in battling Swedish authorities for the right to homeschool.  Dozens of families have already fled abroad, including Jonas Himmelstrand, the chief of the Swedish Homeschooling Association, ROHUS, who fled to Finland with his wife and children.

See what American education has become, in “Crimes of the Educators: How Utopians Are Using Government Schools to Destroy America’s Children.”


http://www.wnd.com/2015/11/homeschool-boy-in-govt-custody-for-7-years/
 

Federal Agencies Fraudulently Cook Data

Did Two Federal Agencies Fraudulently Cook Global Warming Data?

Chairman of the Science, Space, and Technology Committee Lamar Smith speaks on Capitol Hill on March 6, 2013.   

Oversight: A federal agency keeps stonewalling congressional efforts to access its internal communications. 

What's the problem here? 

If the agency's global warming claim was honestly arrived at, just turn over the documents.

The global warming community and its allies are accusing Texas Rep. Lamar Smith, the Republican chairman of the Science, Space and Technology Committee, of conducting a witch hunt.

Several scientific organizations joined forces and told Smith in a letter Tuesday that they have a "grave concern regarding the committee's inquiry into a scientific paper prepared by" National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) researchers. They fear Smith's actions will establish "a practice of inquests."

The committee's ranking member, Democratic Rep. Eddie Bernice Johnson of Texas (South Dallas career very liberal black congresswoman), got in her shots last week. She complained in a letter to Smith that he was conducting "hyper aggressive oversight," going on a "fishing expedition" and an "ideological crusade."

Smith is not looking for communists under the bed. He is merely seeking internal communications between the researchers who said in a June report that there has not been a hiatus in the warming, as other accounts have told us. NOAA's study says the warming has continued without ceasing.

Smith is within his authority to demand the government employees turn over their communications, and it is his duty to perform oversight on the federal researchers. 

Taxpayers are funding the research and policy that would hurt most of us financially might be developed based on NOAA's conclusion. It's imperative that the work conforms to the highest standards.

History shows that scientists are not above doctoring data to further an agenda. Smith likely recalls the ClimateGate scandal at the Climatic Research Unit at the University of East Anglia. Hacked emails from there disclosed that climate researchers discussed hiding "the decline" in temperatures and performing a "trick" with the data to keep the warming scare alive.

A probe into the researchers' behavior found no wrong doing, but it was a whitewash from the beginning. The man-made global warming narrative must go on, even if that means sacrificing the truth.

Of course, truth doesn't matter when propagandists are at work. For this, just look north to Canada where new Prime Minister Justin Trudeau has changed the name of the country's Ministry of the Environment to the Ministry of the Environment and Climate Change.

And if that were not enough, Canadian columnist Emma Teitel is urging Trudeau to "scare us and scare us good" about global warming because "the only way world leaders and activists can change human perception of climate change, in addition to public policy, is through a healthy dose of fear mongering."

http://news.investors.com/ibd-editorials/112515-782653-federal-agencies-possibly-fraudulently-cook-temperature-data.htm

 
 

Professor Examines NASA GISS Temperature Datasets - MASSIVELY ALTERED!!!

“Massively Altered” …German Professor Examines NASA GISS Temperature Dataset

Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert

Source: University of Paderborn

Veteran journalist Günter Ederer* writes a piece reporting that massive alterations have been found in the NASA GISS temperature data series, citing a comprehensive analysis conducted by a leading German scientist. These results are now available to the public.

Ederer reports not long ago retired geologist and data computation expert Professor Dr. Friedrich Karl Ewert began looking at the data behind the global warming claims, and especially the datasets of NASA’s Goddard Institute of Space Studies (GISS).

Ewert painstakingly examined and tabulated the reams of archived data from 1153 stations that go back to 1881 – which NASA has publicly available – data that the UN IPCC uses to base its conclusion that man is heating the Earth’s atmosphere through the burning of fossil fuels. 

According to Ederer, what Professor Ewert found is “unbelievable”:

From the publicly available data, Ewert made an unbelievable discovery: Between the years 2010 and 2012 the data measured since 1881 were altered so that they showed a significant warming, especially after 1950. […] A comparison of the data from 2010 with the data of 2012 shows that NASA-GISS had altered its own datasets so that especially after WWII a clear warming appears – although it never existed.”

Ederer writes that Ewert particularly found alterations at stations in the Arctic. Professor Ewert randomly selected 120 stations from all over the world and compared the 2010 archived data to the 2012 data and found that they had been tampered to produce warming.

The old data showed regular cycles of warming and cooling over the period, even as atmospheric CO2 concentration rose from 0.03% to 0.04%. According to the original NASA datasets, Ederer writes, the mean global temperature cooled from 13.8°C in 1881 to 12.9°C in 1895. Then it rose to 14.3°C by 1905 and fell back under 12.9°C by 1920, rose to 13.9°C by 1930, fell to 13° by 1975 before rising to 14°C by 2000. By 2010 the temperature fell back to 13.2°C.  But then came the “massive” altering of data, which also altered the entire overall trend for the period. 

According to journalist Ederer, Ewert uncovered 10 different methods NASA used to alter the data.  The 6 most often used methods were:

• Reducing the annual mean in the early phase.
• Reducing the high values in the first warming phase.
• Increasing individual values during the second warming phase.
• Suppression of the second cooling phase starting in 1995.
• Shortening the early decades of the datasets.
• With the long-term datasets, even the first century was shortened.

The methods were employed for stations such as Darwin, Australia and Palma de Mallorca, for example, where cooling trends were suddenly transformed into warming.
Ewert then discovered that NASA having altered the datasets once in March 2012 was not enough. 

Alterations were made again in August 2012, and yet again in December 2012. For Palma de Majorca: “Now because of the new datasets it has gotten even warmer. Now they show a warming of +0.01202°C per year.”

Using earlier NASA data, globe is in fact cooling
The veteran German journalist Ederer writes that the media reports of ongoing global warming are in fact not based on reality at all, but rather on “the constantly altered temperatures of the earlier decades.” 

Ederer adds:

Thus the issue of man-made global warming has taken on a whole new meaning: Yes, it is always man-made if the data are adjusted to fit the theory. The meticulous work by Ewert has predecessors, and fits a series of scandals and contradictions that are simply being ignored by the political supporters of man-made climate change.”

Ederer also brings up the analysis by American meteorologists Joseph D’Aleo and Anthony Watts who examined 6000 NASA measurement stations and found an abundance of measurement irregularities stemming in large part from serious siting issues. According to Ederer the findings by Professor Ewert are in close agreement with those of Watts and D’Aleo.

Ederer writes of the overall findings by Professor Ewert:

Using the NASA data from 2010 the surface temperature globally from 1940 until today has fallen by 1.110°C, and since 2000 it has fallen 0.4223°C […]. The cooling has hit every continent except for Australia, which warmed by 0.6339°C since 2000. The figures for Europe: From 1940 to 2010, using the data from 2010, there was a cooling of 0.5465°C and a cooling of 0.3739°C since 2000.”

Ederer summarizes that in view of the magnitude of the scandal, one would think that there would be in investigation. Yet he does not believe this will be the case because the 'global warming' has turned into a trillion-dollar industry and that that too much is tied to it.

UPDATE 1: Also read here.

All datasets are available to the public at any time. The studies by Prof. Ewert may be requested by e-mail: ewert.fk@t-online.de.

*Günter Ederer is a former journalist for ARD and ZDF German Television and has won numerous awards.

http://notrickszone.com/2015/11/20/german-professor-examines-nasa-giss-temperature-datasets-finds-they-have-been-massively-altered/#sthash.234qZCa3.4pz2MYrJ.dpbs

 

 

Jacob Rothschild Says Putin is “A Traitor to the New World Order”

"WE MAY HAVE SOME VERY GOOD NEWS SOON..."

 

 Corruption, Governance, Truth and Republic, World News

Nov242015

 

( Never thought I’d see the day when I favored this man over my own leaders…  but my hat is off to him!!!  /dt )

Jacob Rothschild has accused Russian president Vladimir Putin of being a “traitor to the New World Order.”
Putin’s refusal to tow the NWO line makes Jacob Rothschild nervous, as he needs Russia on their side in order to fulfill the Illuminati agenda.
Conspiracyclub.co reports:
Obama is really getting on Putin’s nerves though because he can’t see why he’s doing the things he’s doing to his own people and warning Americans “Keep your Guns”!

I know no more than anyone else about Putin, but I can deduce some things that might make sense.
First, He would not have reached as high up as he has, just like in America, if he had not been one of them and on their side.
He would never have been head of their intelligence KGB if he was not one of them, and he would never have made it to President.
Does that mean he could not turn on them and betray them? No, it just means that even if he had, he still has not suffered like others who have betrayed the group.
POSTERS COMMENT....
WHAT WE SEE IS PUTIN KICKING THE CABALS ARSE.... WHAT IS THE GOLD FRINGED CORPORATE FLAG HE IS STANDING NEXT TO ALL ABOUT....ESPECIALLY SINCE HE, ACCORDING TO HIS WIFE WAS ASSISINATED?? AND HE LIKE OBOZO, HAS NOT BEEN SEEN FOR A LONG TIME...

TO END ALL THE BS .... WHAT IS NEEDED IS A FEW OF PUTINS SPETSNAZ TROOPS TO GO IN AND TAKE OUT .....ALL..... THE NWO....CRIMINAL LEADERS LIKE JACOB ROTHSCHILD, AND ALL THE OTHER DIRT BAGS AROUND THE WORLD....ALL AT ONCE AND MAKE IT A CLEAN SWEEP.........



The Evidence:

1. The New World Order Exposed by Vladimir Putin
2. Vladimir Putin Exposes the New World Order AGAIN!
3. Putin Tells the Truth About ISIS — the MSM is Silent

By Your News Wire
Source:  http://humansarefree.com/2015/11/jacob-rothschild-says-putin-is-traitor.html

"No one will 'coerce the scientists who work for me!'"

Federal Eye

NOAA chief tells lawmaker: No one will ‘coerce the scientists who work for me’

Andrew Harrer/Bloomberg

The Obama administration is continuing to resist efforts by a top House Republican to gain access to the internal deliberations of federal scientists who authored a groundbreaking global warming study the lawmaker is investigating.

In response to a threat from House Science Committee Chairman Lamar Smith (R-Tex.) to subpoena Commerce Secretary Penny Pritzker, the head of the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration told Smith in a letter Friday that her staff will not be influenced by political interference.

“I have not or will not allow anyone to manipulate the science or coerce the scientists who work for me,” Administrator Kathryn Sullivan wrote.

“If the committee doubts the integrity of the study,” Sullivan wrote, “it has the tools it needs to commission a competing scientific assessment.”

Sullivan was responding to Smith’s claim last week that the climate study, published in June in the peer-reviewed journal Science, was “rushed to publication” over the objections of some NOAA scientists.

Smith, a prominent congressional climate-change skeptic, has for weeks demanded internal documents and e-mails from NOAA he says will prove that the scientists manipulated global temperature data to advance President Obama’s climate agenda. Sullivan has refused to turn them over. The lawmaker then appealed to Pritzker, whose agency includes NOAA, and threatened to subpoena her.

The study refuted claims that global warming had “paused” or slowed over the past decade, undercutting a popular argument used by skeptics like Smith who disagree with the scientific consensus that man-made pollution is behind global warming.

 

 

00:00

Humans’ staggering effect on Earth

 

Images of consumption are the theme of the book, “Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot.” It addresses environmental deterioration through subjects including materialism, consumption, pollution, fossil fuels and carbon footprints.

Images of consumption are the theme of the book, “Overdevelopment, Overpopulation, Overshoot.” It addresses environmental deterioration through subjects including materialism, consumption, pollution, fossil fuels and carbon footprints.

 

Sprawling Mexico City — population 20 million, with a density of 24,600 people per square mile — rolls across the landscape, displacing every scrap of natural habitat.

[Yet another study debunks the global warming ‘pause’]

“Dr. Karl’s study reflects the essence of the scientific process, which involves continually refining conclusions as new data and information is discovered,” Sullivan wrote, referring to Thomas Karl, who led the NOAA team.

She said her agency “is willing to continue to work with the Committee to accommodate its oversight needs,” but it was not immediately clear what she would turn over short of the internal deliberations and communications she has so far refused to provide.

Sullivan also clarified the timeline of the study, telling the chairman that the data her team relied on has been publicly available since July 2014.

The Science paper was submitted in December 2014 and published in June.

Sullivan sought to refute Smith’s claims of political interference, telling him, “Mr. Chairman, let me assure you that I am not engaged in or associated with any ‘politically correct agenda.'”

https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/federal-eye/wp/2015/11/24/noaa-chief-to-lawmaker-on-climate-change-inquiry-i-will-not-allow-anyone-to-coerce-the-scientists-who-work-for-me/

[NOAA climate feud: Pursuit of scientific truth vs. public accountability]

LINK: The book Pablo Lopez Luz  

[Congressman now threatens to subpoena commerce secretary over climate-change study ] 

[Top lawmaker rebutted on climate study accusation]