This is an Awareness Blog to consider the future of your world. Actions are being done now to restore our freedom. County, State, and National Assemblies are forming across our world nullifying the corrupt corporations. Watch and become AWARE! Participate and be a part of making history!
62 MILLION VIEWS PER MONTH
Exclusive public outlet for documentation and notices from The Original Jurisdiction Republic 1861 circa 2010.
Zero Point Energy is the power source behind the Secret Space Program and trump card of the break-away cvilization. How the back-engineering of off-world technology created powerful leverage for corporations to take over control of world government, establish an internationally-manned, secret space program and break-away civilization.
Based on eye-witness accounts and insider information, Mr. McCandlish takes the audience through a series of revelations as to how remarkable breakthrough technology may have been back-engineered from recovered or captured off-world vehicles, enabled aerospace and defense-related corporations to hijack control of governments world-wide, create a special access only secret space program and develop a break-away civilization with its own goals and agenda.
Mr. McCandlish has spent most of his life trying to discover the science that would make such incredible performance possible, and he believes there is a plausible answer to interstellar flight without violating the currently-accepted laws of physics.
Seating The Body Politic from the NATION
STATES PROJECT
The
Nations States Project was initiated by the Pennsylvania (Jural) Assembly when
they filed a package of documents and official Notice (see page 4) with the
PERMANENT BUREAU HAGUE, CONFERENCE ON PRIVATE INTERNATIONAL LAW, SCHEVENINGSWEG
6, THE HAGUE 2517 NL.
Their action was noticed by another group who invited folks to a
phone conference and assisted as many states as possible in duplicating the documentpackage
and notification.
The completed packets were sent to the Pennsylvania folks who
gathered them together and had them delivered to the address above.
This
project was accomplished and completed with relative swiftness in 2012.
Our fascist 'government' at work: The BLM gave Makoil Corporation and Eugene Kozlowski the right to drill oil and gas wells in the middle of a national monument.
The Globalists don't care what you think any more. This is now "In Your Face"!
So as Obama is taking his family on a vacation to Cuba, the BLM is selling America's assets to the highest bidder!
And the 'elite' wonder why Donald Trump says riots are coming?
The Upper Cut: Obama Gets One Thing Right About the Islamic State… What He Said is TERRIFYING
Shortly after the Islamic State group took credit for the Brussels
terror attack last week, Obama made a statement that
was probably intended to be comforting. Instead, it should terrify anyone who understands what he really meant.
“Groups like ISIL can’t destroy us. They can’t defeat us. They don’t
produce anything,” the 'president' said. “They’re not an existential
threat to us.” And, for the most part, Obama was right. And that’s exactly what’s so frightening about his words.
Trust me. I don’t much like admitting that Obama is right about
something. (Luckily, it doesn’t happen often.) But truth is truth no
matter who utters it and regardless of what the moral relativists would
have you believe.
An “existential threat” is just what it sounds like — a threat to our
existence. Does anyone really think that the barbarians of the Islamic
State group have the power to end the existence of the United States?
They don’t. How do I know? Because if they had access to that sort of
power, they would have already used it. They’re not waiting for their
hair to dry or the stars to align. They want us dead, and they want us
dead now. If they could make that happen, you wouldn’t be reading this
right now.
But again, that’s what makes Obama’s position regarding the Islamic State group what an old friend of mine might have called “stupid scary.”
Obama sought to reassure the American people that the nation isn’t in
any real danger from the brutal Islamists because he doesn’t plan to do
anything more effective against the terror army than he’s already
doing. His argument is that he doesn’t need to, and that should frighten
any thinking person. Because the Islamic State group may not be an 'existential threat' to
us, but that doesn’t mean it’s not a threat. The San Bernardino shooting
proved that beyond the ability of even the most ardent Islamapologist
to deny. And as heinous as that event was, it pales in comparison to other
attacks that the terrorists are likely to be able to launch in the near
future if nothing is done to stop them.
The FBI has previously warned about terrorist training camps already present in the United States. The Border Patrol has stopped numerous men of Middle Eastern descent
trying to enter the U.S. illegally through the porous southern border —
and who knows how many have entered without being apprehended, or where
they are now? Islamic State group terrorists could launch chemical attacks or
additional mass shootings, detonate a “dirty bomb” or small nuclear
warhead in a densely populated city, or even attack the nation’s vulnerable electrical grid, potentially plunging millions of people into darkness for an unknown period of time, but probably at least months.
Are any of those threats existential? Would any of those attacks end the United States? Well, you’d have to have a lot less faith in the average American
than I do to think that such attacks would somehow end us, even though
they could of course be devastating. In reality, I suspect attacks like
those would unite Americans like we haven’t been since World War II. The Islamic State group should consider carefully before waking a sleeping giant like that. But, while not existential, such attacks may be inevitable — at least
while we continue to be “led” by a 'president' who apparently believes
that if the Islamic State group is not an existential threat, then it’s
barely any threat at all. http://conservativetribune.com/the-upper-cut-obama-gets-right/
BOOM: WATCH ALL HELL BREAK LOOSE WHEN PASTOR DROPS A BOMB ON MUSLIM IMAM ABOUT MUHAMMAD
Joining Fox News Channel’s Sean Hannity this week, Dallas Pastor Robert Jeffress and Imam Mohammad Ali Elahi battled out the differences between the believers and doctrines of their respective religion.
Right from the get-go, Elahi aligned with Obama’s left wing talking points: “Please stop saying radical Islam. It is either radical or Islam, but can’t be both. Islamic radicalism is a big lie.”
Asked by Hannity if “radical Islam” wa,s in fact, a threat to the U.S., Elahi quickly answered and moved to his talking points.
“Yes, ISIS is evil,” said Elahi. “Islam is not evil. Evil is ignorance. Evil is injustice. Evil is prejudice. Evil is racism.”
The definition of evil he gave was rather fascinating — he put the blame on the entire audience for not knowing that Islam is a religion of peace, even though it’s inherently not.
Pastor: Muhammad Was A Bloodthirsty Warlord
3-30-2016
Echoing Obama’s declaration that “ISIS is not Islamic,” Elahi again rejected any claim that Islamic terrorism draws inspiration from Islamic doctrine.
“Radical Islamists are evil, because they are not Islamic,” added Elahi. The millions of Muslims who have cried “Allahu Akbar” before committing egregious acts against humanity would determine that’s a lie.
Eventually, Elahi pulled out the Ku Klux Klan card, relating them to Christians (what they won’t tell you is that the KKK was actually started by Democrats and the sole reason the Republican party came into existence was to combat slavery).
At this outrageous claim, Pastor Jeffress lit up like a blow torch.
“You can’t find one verse in the New Testament that says, ‘Kill unbelievers.’ Jesus, the founder of our faith, didn’t kill anybody. But you look in the Quran, you can find thirty-five sword verses,” said Jeffress, pastor of the First Baptist Church in Dallas, author and television and radio host.
“Muhammad was nothing but a bloodthirsty warlord who beheaded 600 Jews who would not follow him,” he added.
Damning to say the least. Islam’s attempt to form a geo-political empire that’s established in the four corners of the globe will stop at nothing. We can “carpet bomb” terrorists day and night, but they’ll just keep killing — shouldn’t we be more focused on carpet bombing an explosive and detrimental ideology?
After all, there are 'moderate' Muslims, but there is no such thing as a moderate Quran.
Are dreams about to be made reality? Will we actually see Hillary head to prison in 2016? Check it out.
Former Hillary Clinton IT specialist Bryan Pagliano, a key witness in the investigation into her use of a private server, struck an immunity deal with the Justice Department and apparently has been singing.
An intelligence source told Fox News that he has told the FBI a range of details about how her personal email system was set up and maintained.
The source described him as a “devastating witness.”
Mr. Pagliano can name all those who had access to the Clinton server and devices and when, and reportedly is doing so, allowing investigators to piece together an evidentiary timeline.
It was emphasized to Fox News that Mrs. Clinton’s deliberate “creation” and “control” of the private server used for her official government business is the subject of “intense scrutiny.”
TED NUGENT'S 20 REASONS TO VOTE FOR TRUMP GO VIRAL! LIBERALS HORRIFIED!
Conservative favorite Ted Nugent is known for his straightforward approach.
It should come as no surprise, then, that a recent Facebook post by the outspoken guitarist explaining reasons to vote for GOP front-runner Donald Trump would send liberals into full panic mode.
While Nugent did not endorse any candidate, he said his list in favor of voting for “The Donald” was too special not to share.
We think you’ll agree with him:
Obama is against Trump The Media is against Trump The establishment Democrats are against Trump The establishment Republicans are against Trump The Pope is against Trump The UN is against Trump The EU is against Trump China is against Trump Mexico is against Trump Soros is against Trump Black Lives Matter is against Trump MoveOn.Org is against Trump Koch Bro’s are against Trump Hateful, racist, violent Liberals are against Trump
The Nuge nailed it. The reason these people and organizations are against Trump is because he threatens them and their left-wing agenda.
A Trump presidency would certainly shake up the infrastructure many on this list have either established or fought to maintain under Obama and his administration.
Nugent even provided a few “bonus points” for a Trump presidency as well:
At this time I do not endorse Donald Trump anymore than I endorse Ted Cruz as I admire both gentlemen. But these points are SO damn special! Obama is against Trump The Media is against Trump The establishment Democrats are against Trump The establishment Republicans are against Trump ... The Pope is against Trump The UN is against Trump The EU is against Trump China is against Trump Mexico is against Trump Soros is against Trump Black Lives Matter is against Trump MoveOn.Org is against Trump Koch Bro's are against Trump Hateful, racist, violent Liberals are against Trump Bonus points
Cher says she will leave the country Mylie Cyrus says she will leave the country Whoopi says she will leave the country Rosie says she will leave the country Al Sharpton says he will leave the country Gov. Brown says California will build a wall
There
is absolutely no reason to argue with Nugent on any of this. In fact,
this looks more like a reason to celebrate should Trump make his way to
the White House.
Trump Has Power To Expose Largest Money Laundering Scheme In History
Just another reason Trump has the globalists shaking in their boots
The Alex Jones Show - March 31, 2016
Trump insider Roger Stone breaks down the reasons Donald Trump faces various obstacles in his presidential bid, as both the Democrat and Republican establishment power structures pull out all the stops in efforts to derail him.
Obama has stoked controversy after he suggested to an audience of Argentinian youth that there was no great difference between communism and capitalism and that they should just “choose from what works”.
OBAMA: "You should be practical
and just choose from what works"
Obama responded to a question about nonprofit community organizations and the necessity of attracting funding from both the public and private sectors.
“So often in the past there has been a division between left and right, between capitalists and communists or socialists, and especially in the Americas, that’s been a big debate,” Obama said.
“Those are interesting intellectual arguments, but I think for your generation, you should be practical and just choose from what works. You don’t have to worry about whether it really fits into socialist theory or capitalist theory. You should just decide what works,” he added.
Obama went on to praise Cuba’s socialist system under dictator Raúl Castro, touting the country’s free access to basic education and health care, although he acknowledged that Havana itself “looks like it did in the 1950s” because the economy is “not working”.
Obama concluded his comments by arguing that a market-based system “has to have a social and moral and ethical and community basis”.
Reaction to the remarks wasn’t pretty.
“This man is so destructive, so harmful and so ignorant,” wrote Jim Hoft.
“The Marxist in the White House is erasing the lines between two dangerous ideologies and the one that made the US great, just as he erased our borders. This is a man who would be at home in communist China,” chided the Independent Sentinel.
For a more accurate breakdown of how capitalism beats socialism every time, watch the video below.
Several Western states, including Utah and Colorado, have been ground zero for state vs. federal government clashes over road closures by federal agencies, such as the Bureau of Land Management (BLM) and the U.S. Forest Service (USFS). Closures of existing roads and trails can be due to seasonal conditions or repairs, but they are often arbitrary, hindering hikers, hunters, off-roaders, and sightseers from accessing public lands.
Last year, two elected officials from San Juan County, Utah, were fined nearly $100K and sentenced to brief stints in federal prison for taking part in afour-wheeler “freedom ride” on a trail in Recapture Canyon, which the BLM claimed was closed to motorized traffic.
County commissioner Phil Lyman and Monticello city councilman Monte Wells fought the federal government in court partly on the basis that the trail in Recapture Canyon is protected by Revised Statute-2477 (RS-2477) because it was built long before 1976, when the Federal Land Management and Policy Act (FLPMA) essentially gave Washington, D.C. control over public lands in the West not owned by the states or private interests.
Although Lyman and Wells lost their battle against the feds in this case, other litigants and municipal authorities have used RS-2477 to successfully battle federal road closures on public lands.
RS-2477 is the federal law established in 1866 that authorized the construction of roads across federal public lands. The purpose of RS-2477 was to help settlers in the West establish trade routes and build local roads and highways, as well as cut trails to access homesteads, mines, timber, and other essential resources.
A great deal of confusion has arisen because some mistakenly believe that the 1976 law, FLPMA, repealed RS-2477. However, Section 701 of FLPMA states, “Nothing in this Act or any amendment made by this Act, shall be construed as terminating any valid right-of-way or other land use right or authorization existing on the date of approval of this Act.,” making it clear that all rights-of-way created prior to 1976 remain protected and accessible to the public.
Over the years, federal agencies, as well as private land holders, have illegally closed RS-2477 roads, stirring up controversies and conflicts in counties across the West. Although both governmental and nongovernmental organizations have fought the feds using RS-2477, litigating against the federal government over road closures on public lands can be an onerous and costly process.
One attorney from Colorado is trying to turn the tables using RS-2477. James Beckwith is an attorney specializing in road law and RS-2477. With decades of experience under his belt, he has created a process using constitutional law and historical documents to fight the BLM and USFS when they close roads, making it impossible to access the public lands that purportedly belong to everyone.
More than providing mere legal representation, Beckwith has created a process using historical surveyor plats, archived newspaper stories and photographs, county maps, land deeds, county road maintenance logs, previous petitions to vacate public rights-of-way, and other documentation to build a case for argument against federal road closures.
Numerous organizations such as Public Lands Access Association (PLAA), headquartered in western Colorado, are devoted to assisting complainants, which may be individuals or governing bodies, reopen disputed roads and trails. The role of organizations such as PLAA is to research road history and formulate a documented body of evidence to prove that disputed rights-of-way are protected by RS-2477. http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/03/rs_2477_and_western_lands.html
Are you in doubt that the real original jurisdiction De Jure Republic is being restored? Do you have Questions that you want answered? Do you want to get involved? Visit https://national-assembly.net/ for more information and to participate. Check out the forums as the national assembly is 100% transparent to the public and welcomes public participation. This is the real deal folks. This is our last chance to do it right and nullify the 1871 contract that employed the U.S. Corporation to provide 19 governmental services to the people. This is our right under Article 1 of the Bill of rights. This also nullifies General Order 100 of 1863.
Search This Blog "if this search box is working"
Donation to assist in efforts to restore our republic
The DUKE - Patriot!
Born in 1948 Died in 2015
National Assembly of the people returning to self governance
Join the forums and introduce yourself so your state coordinator can connect with you.
Question -- What is the goal of this website? Why do we share different sources of information that sometimes conflicts or might even be considered disinformation?
Answer -- The primary goal of Nesaranews is to help all people become better truth-seekers in a real-time boots-on-the-ground fashion. This is for the purpose of learning to think critically, discovering the truth from within—not just believing things blindly because it came from an "authority" or credible source. Instead of telling you what the truth is, we share information from many sources so that you can discern it for yourself. We focus on teaching you the tools to become your own authority on the truth, gaining self-mastery, sovereignty, and freedom in the process. We want each of you to become your own leaders and masters of personal discernment, and as such, all information should be vetted, analyzed and discerned at a personal level. We also encourage you to discuss your thoughts in the comments section of this site to engage in a group discernment process.
"It is the mark of an educated mind to be able to entertain a thought without accepting it." – Aristotle
11
Followers
The articles on this blog are reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
US Supreme Court, in 1985, “Dowling v. United States”, unequivocally held that allegations of copyright infringement can be prosecuted only under copyright-specific legislation, not criminal law.
