Dutchsinse |  |
|
Friday, April 29, 2016
Dutchsinse : IT HAPPENED AGAIN!
Boehner calls Cruz ‘Lucifer in the flesh’ !
BOEHNER CALLS CRUZ ‘LUCIFER IN THE FLESH' !
April 28, 2016
Former House Speaker John Boehner offered a rather blunt assessment of Texas Sen. Ted Cruz on Wednesday night. “Lucifer in the flesh,” Boehner said during a talk hosted by Stanford University in Palo Alto, Calif., according to the Stanford Daily.
“I have Democrat friends and Republican friends. I get along with
almost everyone, but I have never worked with a more miserable son of a
bitch in my life.”
The
Ohio Republican, who retired from Congress last fall, said he would
vote for whomever the party nominates for president — unless it’s Cruz. Boehner described the other two GOP hopefuls, Donald Trump and John Kasich, as his “friends.”
Boehner
said he has played golf with Trump for years and that they were
“texting buddies.” His relationship with the Ohio governor, however,
“requires more effort on my behalf than all my other friends … but he’s
still my friend, and I love him.”
Cruz, who introduced Carly Fiorina as his running mate on Wednesday, responded to Boehner’s barb on Twitter Thursday morning. “Tell me again who will stand up to Washington?” the Texas senator tweeted. “Trump, who’s Boehner’s ‘texting and golfing buddy,’ or Carly & me?”
"He allowed his inner Trump to come out,” Cruz said later at a press conference in Indiana. “I think John Boehner has made it crystal clear … if you want a president like John Boehner, Donald Trump is your man.”
On
the Democratic side, Boehner called Bernie Sanders “a nice guy” and
“the most honest politician” in the race despite disagreeing with the
Vermont senator on virtually every issue. But Boehner drew boos from the audience for suggesting Hillary Clinton is pandering to female voters. "Oh, I’m a woman, vote for me,’” he reportedly said.
And while Boehner believes Clinton will ultimately win the Democratic nomination, there could be more twists in store. “Don’t
be shocked if two weeks before the convention, here comes Joe Biden
parachuting in and Obama fanning the flames to make it all happen,” he said.
While
waiting at San Francisco International Airport for his flight back to
Washington, D.C., Boehner didn’t back away from the comments and seemed
surprised that they caused such a stir. “It’s not like I haven’t said the same thing in a bunch of speeches this year,” the former House speaker told Yahoo News.
During
an appearance at a financial conference in Florida last month, Boehner,
who had previously labeled Cruz a “jackass,” referred to the Texas
senator as “Lucifer.”
At the same event, Boehner endorsed his successor, House Speaker Paul Ryan, for president. “If we don’t have a nominee who can win on the first ballot, I’m for none of the above,” Boehner said, according to Politico. “They all had a chance to win. None of them won. So I’m for none of the above. I’m for Paul Ryan to be our nominee.”
https://www.yahoo.com/news/boehner-cruz-lucifer-in-the-flesh-145118346.html
Email Privacy Reform Bill H.R. 699
House Advances Email Privacy Act, Setting the Stage for Vital Privacy Reform
House of Representatives Agrees That 30 Years Is Long Enough, Pushes Much-Needed Email Privacy Reform Bill to the Senate
April 27, 2016
Sophia Cope
The U.S. House of Representatives passed the Email Privacy Act (H.R. 699) today, which would require the government to get a probable cause warrant from a judge before obtaining private communications and documents stored online with companies such as Google, Facebook, and Dropbox.
The bill provides a long-overdue update to the Electronic Communications Privacy Act (ECPA), first passed in 1986. The bill also codifies the Sixth Circuit’s ruling in U.S. v. Warshak, which held that the Fourth Amendment demands that the government first obtain a warrant before accessing emails stored with cloud service providers.
The House vote is historic, given that H.R. 699 has an amazing 315 cosponsors, almost three quarters of the entire House. The House voted unanimously, following a unanimous vote by the House Judiciary Committee earlier this month.
EFF has pushed for an update to ECPA for over six years as part of the Digital Due Process Coalition, which is comprised of civil society groups and technology companies. Today’s win is also the result of efforts by EFF supporters across the country, who have kept a steady drumbeat of pressure on Congress to reform ECPA.
While we applaud the passage of H.R. 699, the bill isn’t perfect. In particular, the Email Privacy Act doesn’t require the government to notify users when it seeks their online data from service providers, a vital safeguard ensuring users can obtain legal counsel to fight for their rights. However, companies may continue to provide notice to users of government requests—prior to compliance—something many companies commit to in our annual Who Has Your Back report.
The government should also be required to obtain a warrant when demanding a person’s geolocation data.
And if the government does obtain any communications data in violation of the law, courts should have the ability to suppress that evidence in criminal prosecutions.
Despite these drawbacks, H.R. 699 is a win for user privacy. We thank the bill’s chief sponsors, Reps. Yoder (R-KS), Polis (D-CO), and Graves (R-GA), and House Majority Leader McCarthy (R-CA) for scheduling today’s vote.
We urge the Senate to pass the Email Privacy Act without any weakening amendments before the 114th Congress ends in January.
Please contact your Senators and demand their support for strong privacy protections for your online data!
https://www.eff.org/deeplinks/2016/04/house-advances-email-privacy-act-setting-stage-vital-privacy-reform?AID=7236
Obama scorned for putting his nose where British lawmakers said it didn’t belong.
Queen to Obama: "Don’t Burn My Lawn This Time!"
"She rarely imposes her will but when she does ..."
England’s Queen Elizabeth II turned 90 this week and dignitaries from all over the world came to celebrate, including President Obama. However, this time, the birthday girl put her foot down and refused to allow the Obama entourage to have their way with how they arrived and comported.
In 2011, when the U.S. commander in chief came to town, he left a trail of destruction in his wake at Windsor Castle, the queen’s home and favorite of all residences. His helicopters, all six of them, scorched the earth at the castle and left landing-gear divots in the manicured lawn.
The Express reported the queen was not amused and required the president to use three helicopters during this year’s visit, to minimize the damage to the castle’s grounds. The Express’ Alix Culbertson wrote, “She said only three helicopters, including the president’s personal aircraft Marine One, could land on the lawn when Mr. Obama, 54, and his wife, Michelle, 52, came for dinner with the Queen and Prince Philip to celebrate her 90th birthday.” Also reported as a requirement was for the president’s security detail to remain outside the Windsor dining hall during the dining hour.
Apparently, it took some time for the Secret Service to come around to the matriarch’s way of thinking but eventually the queen’s demands were met. An inside source reportedly told the Express, “She rarely imposes her will but, when she does, people listen – it just took the US Secret Service agents a little time to realise that.”
The president’s men complied and the event went over without any incidents reported save the complete shutdown of air traffic over London when the president’s choppers arrived. The choppers were also reportedly escorted by F-22 Raptors poised to shoot down any airborne threats against the president and first lady.
Just a day prior to the birthday celebration, Obama opined the United Kingdom should stay in the European Union, which resulted in the president being scorned for putting his nose where British lawmakers said it didn’t belong. The president has been urging lawmakers of the British parliament to remain in the EU, an urging that, as Western Journalism previously reported, resulted in parliamentarians drafting an open letter urging the U.S. president to mind his own business.
The queen’s birthday celebration was a reported success. And Obama even remarked how “adorable” Prince George was when the president had dinner with Prince William, Kate Middleton and Prince Harry the evening before the queen’s birthday bash.
http://www.westernjournalism.com/queen-to-obama-dont-burn-my-lawn-this-time/?utm_source=Email&utm_medium=PostUp&utm_campaign=ConservativeBrief&utm_content=2016-04-27
calling-out-john-daresh-and-nla-round-two-by-anna-von-reitz/
Today, I will address Daresh’s “Information”— which should
rightly be titled, “Disinformation” issued a couple days ago. I quote:
Daresh: “This brings us to the main purpose of this Information: Government agent provocateurs have been fueling a quasi-shadow government movement that essentially advocates the overthrow of the government.”
Anna: What government? A corporation run by international banking cartels is not our government, is it? In fact, a corporation doesn’t actually have the capacity to act as a sovereign government at all and we are merely stretching euphemism beyond its limit to pretend that it does.
Daresh: People in this movement, led by de facto Judge Anna Von Reitz, de facto Judge Bruce Doucette and de facto god-graced Administrator Joaquin Folch, who have taken on these self-appointed titles, are duping people from the liberty movements looking for a solution to the subversion within our government who, being ignorant of the law, fall prey to the Pied Pipers .
Anna: There are no “self-appointed titles” involved including “Pied Piper” and nothing “de facto” about it. Everything we’ve done is firmly based on existing Law. We are filling vacated public offices that are owed to our own de jure government. When we offered to show Daresh the facts, he wouldn’t look. His response was rump in the air, head in the sand. So there he sits, ignorant as ever, making irresponsible accusations. NLA deserves far, far better leadership, thank you.
Read the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) for yourselves and then read my explanation of how all this happened in the “Common Law vs. Admiralty Law” article posted at www.annavonreitz.com.
Daresh: Many who are following these de facto judges, actually believe them to be properly elected or appointed.
Anna: We are properly elected Common Law Judges but Daresh mistakenly thinks that we are “supposed to be” Admiralty Judges instead. He expected me to be a Bar Attorney—that’s how far behind the curve he really is. “Oh, look, Dick, there’s a squirrel…..no, Jane, it’s a cat with a fluffy tail….”
Daresh: Even we thought for a while that Anna Von Reitz was an Alaskan Supreme Court Judge. We spent many months attempting to verify whether she was even a real person.
Anna: Hahahahahahah! I have been here in the same spot since 1992 as thousands of people who have contacted me directly and honestly can confirm. The key words here are “honestly and directly”.
I sent Daresh an original wet-ink copy of our American Affidavit of Probable Cause complete with all my contact information last July and I have the mailing receipts to prove it. Did he call me? No. Did he email me? No. Did he write me a letter? No. Ask me any questions? No.
Let’s just say all those “months” they tried so hard to “verify” my existence could have been settled with a phone call and weren’t. Daresh wasn’t looking for me. He was trying to avoid me and to avoid taking action on our affidavit.
Daresh: But, when she finally surfaced……
Anna: Yeah, right, as if I was hiding. That’s why I issue all my documents, books, articles, everything, with current contact information?
Daresh: …..We saw that she was connected to this quasi-shadow government movement that we have been hearing about; but we had yet to identify the people who are part of this movement until now. We believe the leaders of this movement are fueled by government agent provocateurs.
Anna: Daresh is so clueless that he appears not to know what the “shadow government” is or what the phrase means—- let me enlighten him (and everyone else who needs to know). The Shadow Government was put in place by FDR many long years ago. It refers to all the appointed offices and agencies that have been promulgating their own rules —like the FBI and FEMA and IRS and DHS— and then left to run rampant over the people who pay their wages.
This “government by political appointment” is the “Shadow Government” — as defined by those who first coined the term back in the 1930’s and 40’s. —-and not coincidentally, it was the “Shadow Government” that murdered LaVoy Finicum.
All those so senselessly and groundlessly accused—myself, Judge Doucette, and the others— not only support the Common Law Grand Jury Movement, we are committed to restoring the entire American Common Law Court System.
Anyone who supports the resurrection of the Common Law Grand Juries ought to, as a matter of logic and principle, also support the restoration of the American Common Law Court System that gave the CLGJ’s birth and meaning and enforcement in this country for over 350 years.
But not John Daresh.
He wants to pretend that the restoration of our own Common Law Court System including the Common Law Grand Jury portion of it —-is a plot, an attempt to “overthrow the government”. What a Logic Failure. Grade “F”.
There are a number of reasons why our effort to restore our entire court system cannot be construed as any act of “insurrection” or attempt to “overthrow” any government.
First, there’s the plain fact that we haven’t advocated any such thing.
Second, there’s the fact that no foreign corporation is competent to act as a sovereign government with respect to us and these United States, so the concept of “insurrection” doesn’t apply.
Third, there’s the fact that just as we are heir to the Common Law Grand Jury we are heir to the entire American Common Law Court System as well. If we are owed one part of it, we are owed the whole of it.
The many good people associated with NLA who are trying to restore the Common Law Grand Juries don’t deserve “leadership” that tells lies and causes trouble, nor do they need a truncated vision that leaves their Grand Juries spinning their wheels, going nowhere.
The simple fact is that the Grand Juries are meant to be part of the whole American Common Law Court System and without the whole Court functioning in support of their actions, the Grand Juries are about as useless as a windmill on a still day. They can hand down presentments and informations and writs until they are blue in the face and have nothing to show for their effort but a thank you from John Daresh.
This is what we are trying to tell NLA, and if you stop and think about it, you will realize that what we are telling you is true.
https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2016/04/29/calling-out-john-daresh-and-nla-round-two-by-anna-von-reitz/
Daresh: “This brings us to the main purpose of this Information: Government agent provocateurs have been fueling a quasi-shadow government movement that essentially advocates the overthrow of the government.”
Anna: What government? A corporation run by international banking cartels is not our government, is it? In fact, a corporation doesn’t actually have the capacity to act as a sovereign government at all and we are merely stretching euphemism beyond its limit to pretend that it does.
Daresh: People in this movement, led by de facto Judge Anna Von Reitz, de facto Judge Bruce Doucette and de facto god-graced Administrator Joaquin Folch, who have taken on these self-appointed titles, are duping people from the liberty movements looking for a solution to the subversion within our government who, being ignorant of the law, fall prey to the Pied Pipers .
Anna: There are no “self-appointed titles” involved including “Pied Piper” and nothing “de facto” about it. Everything we’ve done is firmly based on existing Law. We are filling vacated public offices that are owed to our own de jure government. When we offered to show Daresh the facts, he wouldn’t look. His response was rump in the air, head in the sand. So there he sits, ignorant as ever, making irresponsible accusations. NLA deserves far, far better leadership, thank you.
Read the Foreign Sovereigns Immunities Act (FSIA) and the International Organizations Immunities Act (IOIA) for yourselves and then read my explanation of how all this happened in the “Common Law vs. Admiralty Law” article posted at www.annavonreitz.com.
Daresh: Many who are following these de facto judges, actually believe them to be properly elected or appointed.
Anna: We are properly elected Common Law Judges but Daresh mistakenly thinks that we are “supposed to be” Admiralty Judges instead. He expected me to be a Bar Attorney—that’s how far behind the curve he really is. “Oh, look, Dick, there’s a squirrel…..no, Jane, it’s a cat with a fluffy tail….”
Daresh: Even we thought for a while that Anna Von Reitz was an Alaskan Supreme Court Judge. We spent many months attempting to verify whether she was even a real person.
Anna: Hahahahahahah! I have been here in the same spot since 1992 as thousands of people who have contacted me directly and honestly can confirm. The key words here are “honestly and directly”.
I sent Daresh an original wet-ink copy of our American Affidavit of Probable Cause complete with all my contact information last July and I have the mailing receipts to prove it. Did he call me? No. Did he email me? No. Did he write me a letter? No. Ask me any questions? No.
Let’s just say all those “months” they tried so hard to “verify” my existence could have been settled with a phone call and weren’t. Daresh wasn’t looking for me. He was trying to avoid me and to avoid taking action on our affidavit.
Daresh: But, when she finally surfaced……
Anna: Yeah, right, as if I was hiding. That’s why I issue all my documents, books, articles, everything, with current contact information?
Daresh: …..We saw that she was connected to this quasi-shadow government movement that we have been hearing about; but we had yet to identify the people who are part of this movement until now. We believe the leaders of this movement are fueled by government agent provocateurs.
Anna: Daresh is so clueless that he appears not to know what the “shadow government” is or what the phrase means—- let me enlighten him (and everyone else who needs to know). The Shadow Government was put in place by FDR many long years ago. It refers to all the appointed offices and agencies that have been promulgating their own rules —like the FBI and FEMA and IRS and DHS— and then left to run rampant over the people who pay their wages.
This “government by political appointment” is the “Shadow Government” — as defined by those who first coined the term back in the 1930’s and 40’s. —-and not coincidentally, it was the “Shadow Government” that murdered LaVoy Finicum.
All those so senselessly and groundlessly accused—myself, Judge Doucette, and the others— not only support the Common Law Grand Jury Movement, we are committed to restoring the entire American Common Law Court System.
Anyone who supports the resurrection of the Common Law Grand Juries ought to, as a matter of logic and principle, also support the restoration of the American Common Law Court System that gave the CLGJ’s birth and meaning and enforcement in this country for over 350 years.
But not John Daresh.
He wants to pretend that the restoration of our own Common Law Court System including the Common Law Grand Jury portion of it —-is a plot, an attempt to “overthrow the government”. What a Logic Failure. Grade “F”.
There are a number of reasons why our effort to restore our entire court system cannot be construed as any act of “insurrection” or attempt to “overthrow” any government.
First, there’s the plain fact that we haven’t advocated any such thing.
Second, there’s the fact that no foreign corporation is competent to act as a sovereign government with respect to us and these United States, so the concept of “insurrection” doesn’t apply.
Third, there’s the fact that just as we are heir to the Common Law Grand Jury we are heir to the entire American Common Law Court System as well. If we are owed one part of it, we are owed the whole of it.
The many good people associated with NLA who are trying to restore the Common Law Grand Juries don’t deserve “leadership” that tells lies and causes trouble, nor do they need a truncated vision that leaves their Grand Juries spinning their wheels, going nowhere.
The simple fact is that the Grand Juries are meant to be part of the whole American Common Law Court System and without the whole Court functioning in support of their actions, the Grand Juries are about as useless as a windmill on a still day. They can hand down presentments and informations and writs until they are blue in the face and have nothing to show for their effort but a thank you from John Daresh.
This is what we are trying to tell NLA, and if you stop and think about it, you will realize that what we are telling you is true.
https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2016/04/29/calling-out-john-daresh-and-nla-round-two-by-anna-von-reitz/
Thursday, April 28, 2016
National Assembly Conference Call For Information
National Assembly Conference Call
For Information
(Sponsored by Michigan General Jural Assembly=MGJA)
Welcome to the National Assembly Conference Call – This is the next step in acquiring accurate information to assist you in settling your county and state.
Please follow the steps outlined here to access this important educational conference call.
Join our Conference Call EVERY OTHER Thursday evening:
6pm Pacific – 7pm Mountain
8pm Central – 9pm Eastern
Talk Shoe Call # 724-444-7444
Access Code 140924# Guest 1#
To listen with your computer:
Next Call Scheduled for
Thursday May 12,2016
Once Daily Digest Email
Ambassador Lee E Wanta
AmeriTrust Groupe, Inc.
Office of the Chairman / Chief Executive Officer
4001 North 9 th Street, Suite No. 227
Arlington, Virginia, USA 22203-1954
Commonwealth of Virginia
Tele : 703.649.4545
Tfax : 703.552.3159
Is the Wall Street Cartel Regrouping? Regulator Fires Warning Shot
http://wallstreetonparade.com/
By Pam Martens and Russ Martens: April 28, 2016
Remember the chat rooms dubbed “The Cartel” and “The Bandits Club” that
contributed to felony counts against the mega Wall Street banks last May for
rigging the foreign currency markets? How about that classic from the Barclays
chat room trader: “if you aint cheating, you aint trying.”
Well, [...]
American Hope and Reason !!
Common Law v. Admiralty Law, People v. Persons, by Anna von Reitz
Our Forefathers CHOSE the system of Common Law based on the Law of
Moses (Ten Commandments) as the Law of the Land and they chose men to
serve as judges from among themselves in every county, state, and
region.
.
If we want to live under that system of law, we have to do the same
thing. CHOOSE to live under Common Law, form a jural assembly for our
communities as brilliantly summarized by the Michigan Jural Assembly
which has already had their Common Law System in place for decades,
elect judges to fill the vacant judicial offices, and live accordingly.
.
This is the way this country was set up and so far as I am
concerned, the way it is still supposed to run. Those who don’t want to
accept that are outlaws. Those who do are law abiding. Simple as
that.
.
We are free to accept, amend, and reject laws within that system as
every jury sees fit. That is why we have JURY NULLIFICATION built into
this whole process.
.
ANY law passed by ANY legislative body in the Common Law System can
be nullified by a body of twelve honest Americans sitting as a jury.
Such a jury can rewrite a law they find unfair or impractical or they
can utterly reject one they find unjust, vague, or unworkable.
.
Jury nullification is where the average people called to jury duty
get to enforce their will on the entire system— in Common Law, that is.
Also, in Common Law, the judge serves the people– he doesn’t tell them
what to do. He doesn’t interpret the law. The jury does that. He
listens to the arguments along with the jury, maintains fair rules of
evidence and argument, asks questions, but at the end of the day, the
JURY makes their own decision and the judge executes their sentence.
.
That is also why there is no appeal from a jury trial unless
substantial new evidence likely to have changed their reasoning comes to
light. The JURY interprets and speaks the law under Common Law and
what they decide becomes the law, no ifs, ands, or buts.
.
The judge is just a referee and servant of the court and the clerk
is just that, a clerk keeping good records of the proceedings and
testimony, evidence and filings.
.
There are other marked characteristics of Common Law that you need
to be aware of; Under Common Law, nobody can be summoned to a court
without a presentment from a Grand Jury.
.
Under Common Law, everyone is presumed innocent until proven guilty.
.
Under Common Law, there has to be an actual, identifiable injured
party— someone has to stand up and accuse you of harming them or their
own property.
.
The only exception is in the case of murder or disabling injury of a
victim, such that the injured party cannot bring suit for themselves.
.
There is no such thing as a “victimless crime” under Common Law.
.
The Judges in Common Law, (or, to use their proper name, Justices)
are not necessarily graduates of any Law School and they cannot be
members of the Bar Association, rather, they are respected members of
their community who are trusted to make fair decisions about rules of
evidence and argument and to oversee courtroom proceedings so as to
guarantee a fair trial.
.
That’s really their only function, because remember— under Common
Law — the people sitting on the jury make all the decisions. The
Justice is just there to organize things properly and impose a level
playing field for both sides to get a fair hearing of the issues.
.
This is the system that we are heir to once we clearly decide to adopt our birthright status as American State Nationals.
.
But this is NOT the system that we have been living under for the
last umpteen years, because we have all been “mistaken on purpose” as
“citizens of the United States” instead.
.
That phrase, a “citizen of the United States” means in the words of
Kitchens v. Steele, “a citizen of the federal government”. And the
federal government is defined as a corporation doing business as the
UNITED STATES.
.
Such “citizens” live under the international law of the sea, not the Common Law.
.
In their courts the judge is all-powerful and juries are rubber stamps for him.
.
The judge interprets the law in these admiralty courts, tells the
jury what to think, tells the jury what they may or may not consider as
evidence, tells the jury everything but how to wipe their noses.
.
Their courts operate just as everyone can see them operating—- as
prejudicial military tribunals where everyone is considered guilty until
proven innocent and where no constitutional guarantees apply.
.
In their courts, there are endless codes and statutes and regulatory infractions and abundant cases of victimless crimes.
.
The majority of cases in such courts never present an actual
injured party and both plaintiffs and defendants are represented by
attorneys acting as Third Parties giving hearsay evidence that would be
immediately thrown out of any Common Law court.
.
You all know or should know that you are supposed to be operating
as people on the land and not as persons on the sea. The Preamble of the
Constitution doesn’t read, “We, the Persons…..”
.
If you are going to live as free people you also have cause to know
that you have choices to make both about your political status —
“people” or “person”, Common Law or Admiralty or some other law form
entirely— and that you are then also required then to know how your
chosen system of law works.
.
You are being misidentified and mischaracterized as “citizens of
the United States” with “United States” defined as “territories and
District of Columbia” and you are being treated as “persons” because
you aren’t standing up and declaring your allegiance to your lawful
state of the Union and you aren’t filling your vacated public offices
and running your own American Common Law Courts.
.
Mulligan Ex Parte very clearly states that wherever our American
Common Law Courts are up and operating, the admiralty courts must cease
operating as military tribunals and revert to their proper place as
courts merely concerned with actual maritime contracts and other
admiralty issues.
.
These foreign international courts which are doing so much damage
to our property and our people are merely opportunists filling a gap
that we left open through ignorance. When our courts stand on the land,
their courts cannot usurp— but when we allow our Common Law Court System
to stand vacant, the cat is away and the rats can play.
.
I can hear some people asking— what do you mean, our courts are vacant? How? When? Why?
.
It’s simple, really, It happened through ignorance and pen strokes and greed.
.
The moment you incorporate anything, it leaves the jurisdiction of
the land and sets sail on the international jurisdiction of the sea. So
the simple act of incorporating a county government changes its
jurisdiction and its character and its law form.
.
It never mattered if the “federal government” acted as a
corporation because all of its duties assigned by the actual
Constitution were international in nature. They were assigned and
limited to international jurisdiction and under international law from
the start.
.
The state and county governments on the other hand, are responsible
for operating the land jurisdiction. That’s why our states and counties
are geographically defined and the reason that they all have borders.
.
But back in the 1960’s all those organizations that were entrusted
with running the state and county governments at that time were seduced
by the lure of “Federal Revenue Sharing”—- a cut of the kickbacks from
federal racketeering— into signing up as incorporated franchises of the
federal government— that is, as franchises of the federal corporation
doing business as the UNITED STATES, INC.
.
Now, just because all those organizations took the bait and
obligated themselves and incorporated themselves and agreed to act as
franchises (like Dairy Queen franchises) does NOT mean that you can’t
form your own unincorporated state and county governments to do the job
you still need done. The important word here is: “unincorporated”.
.
The land and Law of the Land and people are all part of the unincorporated Body Politic. The international
.
You have to elect Sheriffs to represent the land jurisdiction and
to enforce the actual Constitution and Organic Laws, because with the
stroke of a pen back in the 1960’s, the Sheriff of the newly
incorporated “County” became a law enforcement officer concerned with
statutes and regulations and code enforcement instead. He stopped
working for you, and started working for the local federal goverment
corporation franchise instead.
.
Your Common Law Court System which had existed since the early
1600’s disappeared, too. Why? Because the people then operating the
courts, back circa 1950 to 1965, incorporated them as part of the newly
incorporated state and county franchise operations, and thereby
converted our courts into an admiralty court system instead.
.
If you want your Common Law Court System back and functioning and
want to send these foreign admiralty courts packing, you have to set
your county and state courts up as unincorporated Jural Assemblies.
Thankfully, there have always been Americans who stayed awake.
.
The Michigan Jural Assembly organized their state and kept it
organized through thick and thin. The Nation States Project came forward
and filed its claim to Pennsylvania. The Union States Assembly kept
the fires burning on the Eastern Seaboard. In Texas, in Colorado, in
Florida, in Wisconsin, in New Mexico, in California and throughout the
land—- by Townships and Parishes and even Home Owner Associations—
Americans have kept their local governments alive and denied the
corporate interlopers any claim of “exclusive legislative jurisdiction”.
.
And now that more and more people are waking up and realizing just
how far down the tubes things have gotten without their participation,
Americans are stepping forward by the millions and doing what needs to
be done.
.
Ignorant men have raised objections to what I and Bruce Doucette
and Gary Darby and many other Americans are doing by occupying the
vacated offices and acting as judges serving the American Common Law
Court System. They think that we are somehow impersonating offices in
the admiralty court system, which is obviously and abundantly untrue.
.
They also think that we have to be members of the Bar
Associations—- when in fact we can’t be members of the Bar and serve in
any American Common Law Court office whatsoever.
.
They think that we are offering to oppress them in some way or
establish an additional unwanted or improper authority over them, but
the fact is that they have the same choice they have always had—- they
can function as “persons” and submit themselves to international
admiralty law, or they can function as “people” and submit themselves to
the law of the land.
.
We are simply choosing our traditional law form and organizing
ourselves to provide Common Law Court services for the land jurisdiction
of these United States, and thereby exercising a prerogative that has
always been ours.
.
Each one of us has the ability and responsiblity to choose our
political status and our form of law and to act accordingly. It would be
just as wrong for us to force anyone to act as one of the “people” of
these United States as it would be wrong for them to force us to act as a
“person” under international admiralty law.
.
Which is the whole point.
.
They are free to identify themselves as “citizens of the United
States” with “United States” defined as “territories and District of
Columbia”. They can operate as “persons” if they want to adopt that
status and they can incorporate federal franchise “STATES” to serve
their needs. We won’t stop them.
.
And by the same stroke, we can identify ourselves as members of the
“free, independent, and sovereign people of the United States” —– these
United States of Wisconsin, Oregon, Texas, and so on, which are the
actual organic states of the Union, and we can operate our lawful
government owed to the land jurisdiction of this country to serve our
needs.
.
Recently, there has been a flap with the ironically named “National
Liberty Alliance” and its leadership. They have ignorantly and falsely
accused us of “insurrection”. If anyone is guilty of insurrection
against these United States, it is those presently operating admiralty
courts on our soil and practicing personage-for-profit against the
people of this country.
.
We, the people, are the living, actual, factual government of the
people, for the people, and by the people. There is no such government
of the person, for the person, and by the person– a fact that those who
adopt “personhood’ should consider carefully and well.
Neobytes :) Meteorologist gets prompted to upgrade to Windows 10 on live TV
NeoBytes :) is an occasional feature that takes a
step back from the big headlines, to take a look at what else is
happening in the vast, scary expanse of the tech world - often with a
cynical eye, always with a dose of humour.
Microsoft's Windows 10 operating system has been installed on over 270 million devices; however, you might think that the firm just isn't trying hard enough to get the OS installed on more devices.
A meteorologist from KCCI has shown us that those fears can subside, as she was prompted to upgrade to Windows 10 on live TV. While reporting the weather, she saw the pop-up that we've become all too familiar with.
It took her about 10 seconds to realize that the offer was present on the screen, perhaps because we have all become so numb to it. She handled it professionally, laughing it off and saying, "What should I do? Don't you love when that happens?"
Later, she has trouble with her 'clicker', blames it on Windows 10, and then says "Don't do it!"
Source: KCCI
http://www.neowin.net/news/neobytes--meteorologist-gets-prompted-to-upgrade-to-windows-10-on-live-tv
Microsoft's Windows 10 operating system has been installed on over 270 million devices; however, you might think that the firm just isn't trying hard enough to get the OS installed on more devices.
A meteorologist from KCCI has shown us that those fears can subside, as she was prompted to upgrade to Windows 10 on live TV. While reporting the weather, she saw the pop-up that we've become all too familiar with.
It took her about 10 seconds to realize that the offer was present on the screen, perhaps because we have all become so numb to it. She handled it professionally, laughing it off and saying, "What should I do? Don't you love when that happens?"
Later, she has trouble with her 'clicker', blames it on Windows 10, and then says "Don't do it!"
Source: KCCI
http://www.neowin.net/news/neobytes--meteorologist-gets-prompted-to-upgrade-to-windows-10-on-live-tv
“justice-involved” criminals individuals
GET READY TO SAY THIS INSTEAD!!!!
“justice-involved” criminals individuals
POLITICAL 'CORRECTNESS' IS DESTROYING OUR NATION
Thomas Holmes on April 27, 2016
Political Correctness and propaganda strike again! Item #187 of how the Left manipulates everything it touches to facilitate their agenda, regardless of whether it actually helps: No longer are we using the term “convicted criminals”. Apparently, it’s harmful for these delicate little snowflakes who are the real victims of their crimes. Instead, according Breitbart these felons “justice-involved” criminals individuals are getting help from the Department of Justice to avoid the consequences of their crimes with this very intentional identity makeover.
Breitbart reports that the DOJ is all over shoving this idiom down everyone’s throats in order to enable criminals to obtain jobs and housing once they’re out of prison. Along with the new preferred term, the DOJ is piling $1.75 million of taxpayer money to social organizations that support such programs. As Attorney General Loretta Lynch put it, “by helping justice-involved youth find decent jobs and stable housing after they return home, these critical grants provide a foundation for a fresh start and offer a path towards productivity and purpose.”
Notionally, it seems perfectly reasonable that people who made a mistake in the past would simply like the chance to rebuild their life the right way. I’ve got no objection to that, in principle. Unfortunately, that’s not really what’s going on here. Let me break it down:
- PC strikes again. It is both more accurate and more important to refer to criminals as just that. We know exactly who they are and where they come from. There is no rehabilitation without acknowledging your past and if society is being forced to look the other way, hey maybe my history of rape or armed robbery isn’t such a big deal. The term “justice involved” is intentionally vague and uncertain. It’s also somehow condescending to both the convict and the rest of society. The more platitudes the Left can invent, the further they think they can move the definition of things to whatever they prefer. Vagueness is the key starting point for all that. Additionally, if you’re some Neanderthal who still calls them criminals, you’ll out yourself as being a bigot and waayyy behind the times. Also, it’s worth mentioning that this all came about during “National Reentry Week” which is apparently a thing. Yep, felons get their own commemorative week.
- Like the Left’s sprint to give every illegal immigrant they can find voting rights, this is simply a desperate ploy to increase the number of likely Democrat voters. There’s not a single real principle being fought over here. Sure President Obama can couch this as about rehabilitation but, like fellow Leftist (and my Governor, sadly) Terry McAuliffe’s unilateral move to restore convicted criminal’s voting rights, this is all about whoring out their philosophical heritage for votes wherever they can scrounge them up. The Left may have always been light on the concept of personal responsibility and facing consequences, but thanks to ‘ol Barry in the White House the Left thinks they can practically smell Utopia. No Democrat fought for giving rapists and thugs the same democratic power as productive, law-abiding citizens just like no Democrat suddenly shed tears over transgender bathrooms until it became politically and socially profitable for them to do so.
- As Breitbart reported, National Reentry Week and the 2007 Second Chance Act enables President Obama and the DOJ the ability to expunge or seal the criminal records of adult felons as old as 24. We’re not talking teens who wen joy riding on prom night, we’re talking grown men who’s potentially violent past and character traits would be hidden from potential landlords. Clash Daily previously reported that Obama is forcing landowners to rent their private property to criminals whether they like it or not.
http://clashdaily.com/2016/04/obama-new-name-criminals-felons-living-near/?utm_source=newsletter&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=166640&utm_keyword=major1&utm_content=19814718&utm_source=Email&utm_medium=email&utm_content=subscriber_id:19814718&utm_campaign=Obama%20to%20BAN%20the%20Phrase%20%E2%80%98Convicted%20Criminal%E2%80%99%20%E2%80%94%20Get%20Ready%20to%20Say%20THIS%20Instead
OBAMA PLOTS WITH UN TO INCREASE MUSLIM "REFUGEES" FROM 10,000 TO 200,000....
Obama plots with UN to increase Muslim “refugees” from 10,000 to 200,000....
|
7:45 AM (1 hour ago)
 | | ||
| ||||
Obama means to do as much damage as he can in the last months of his failed presidency. Europe is the cautionary tale. It had been struggling with its Muslim population, but this invasion/hijrah is the final nail in the coffin. Obama means to bring it here.
Evil. #Obamastan
The Post-American Presidency: The Obama Administration’s War on America
“U.S. plots with United Nations to expand Syrian refugees from 10,000 to 200,000,” By Paul Bedard, Washington Examiner, 4/25/16, (thanks to Lookmann):
In a move around the standard refugee settlement process in America, the United Nations and the administration are scheming to find other ways to boost the number of Syrians entering the country, from 10,000 this year to possibly 200,000.
U.S. officials, meeting with United Nations human rights officials in Geneva, joined in a project that looks to “alternative safe pathways” to setting Syrian refugees in America and Europe that include pushing colleges and universities to offer tuition programs and encouraging Syrians already in the country to open their homes to those who’ve fled the war-torn Middle East nation.
The plan already has one victory. Last week, the University of Southern California revealed that it is offering five free tuition programs for Syrian refugees, including one in the school’s journalism program.
The effort was revealed Monday in a Center for Immigration Studies post. It quoted a Georgetown University professor and U.N. refugee policy advisor who spelled out the backdoor plan to settle thousands more Syrians past the 10,000 President Obama has pledged to OK this year.
http://www.dcclothesline.com/
HOW MANY OF YOU ARE HAPPY WITH THE WAY WE ARE BEING PLAYED BY THE PTB?? WE ARE BEING SPRAYED BIG TIME BY LITHIUM SPRAYERS...IT CAN AND WILL KILL THE ONES THAT IGNOR THIS INFORMATION...
North Carolina High School Opens Gun Range
LIBERALS LOSE THEIR MINDS
Smithfield-Selma High has opened up a gun range on campus and it is sparking much debate.
Liberals always talk about how they only want well trained people to operate guns, but when they get their wish, they still are complaining.
They are also air rifles, and only shoot pellets.
“There’s a marksmanship safety test they have to take, and they have to get a 100 on it,” Commander David Wegman said. “In addition to that, they have to sign a safety pledge, get permission from home and then finally demonstrate on the range that they know how to handle one of these air rifles safely.”
http://conservativevideos.com/north-carolina-high-school-opens-gun-range-liberals-lose-their-minds/
America should establish right now - and it is already too late - to have required issue and training on guns in the teen years. If these young ones can join the military to fight for the criminal war machine cabal overseas, then they can certainly train to defend their own nation and serve in American militias on American soil. In years past there seemed to be no 'need' for it, but now - especially with the corporation 'government' in Wash DC purposely bringing in muslims and illegals as 'immigrants' and 'refugees', now more than ever America needs to seriously consider training the young and the older in self defense of our nation.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
