PRIVATE CIA AGENT SOURCE: Foreign cash to Hillary Clinton's campaign

Tuesday, May 24, 2016

Subject: JUST IN: PRIVATE CIA AGENT SOURCE: Foreign cash to Hillary Clinton's campaign tracked through Richmond

 

Foreign Cash To Hillary Clinton's 

Campaign Tracked Through Richmond

May 24-25, 2016

 

Longtime friend of Bill and Hillary Clinton, Virginia Governor Terry McAuliffe, is under an FBI and Justice Department investigation for accepting campaign donations for his gubernatorial race from Chinese billionaire Wang Wenliang. But the stunning revelation's impact is not merely limited to Richmond, the Virginia state capital.  

Wang, who has served as a delegate to the Chinese National People's Congress, owns Rilin Enterprises. In 2013, Rilin pledged $2 million to the Clinton Foundation. The foundation, overseen by Hillary and Bill Clinton, as well as daughter Chelsea Mezvinsky, is the subject of an FBI probe involving Mrs. Clinton's private email server used while she was Secretary of State. There are charges that one of the purposes of the private server was to hide emails concerning the Clintons' "pay-to-play" scheme. The FBI probe is looking at not only the lack of security for sensitive and possibly classified emails but also whether Mrs. Clinton used her office as America's chief diplomat to shake down foreign governments and businesses for cash to the Clinton Foundation -- and Mrs. Clinton's own campaign coffers -- in exchange for top-level access to officials in the Obama administration.  

WMR highlighted the Clintons' "pay-to-play" scheme eight years ago in an article titled: "Clinton & Clinton, Inc: Global panhandlers." Mrs. Clinton's Senate confirmation hearing for Secretary of State was the opportunity for Republicans to bring up the Clinton Foundation donor list, which was reluctantly released by the foundation to smooth over the confirmation process. Republicans, who have their own problems with foreign donations, particularly the Senate's chief "crybaby" John McCain, kept relatively silent. The donor list was rife with potential conflicts-of-interest. Some of these conflicts now plague Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign.

The Following Is Excerpted From Our

December 2008 Report: 

"Last April, during the height of the primary race between Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama, the issue of the William J. Clinton Foundation was raised. Obama's camp called on former President Clinton to release the names of the donors to the Clinton on Foundation. In an April 3, 2008, Op-Ed in USA Today, Clinton pal and Clinton Foundation CEO Bruce Lindsey said for Clinton to release the donor list would 'violate the president's pledge to foundation donors that their contributions could remain anonymous unless they chose otherwise. 

Now that Hillary is Obama's selection to be Secretary of State, Bill Clinton has been forced to do what he refused to do during the primary season: name the donors to his foundation. It is all because his wife now faces Senate confirmation scrutiny over possible conflicts-of-interest rather than primary voter scrutiny. And as far as  Bill and Hillary Clinton are concerned, let the voters be damned when it comes to accountability. 

Lindsey concluded his Op-Ed by writing, 'It would be a true shame if political motivations in a presidential campaign discouraged magnanimous people from supporting the efforts of the Clinton Foundation to save and improve lives around the world.' It now appears from the names on Clinton's list that the lives the former President sought to improve were his and his wife's.

Clinton's donors raise all kinds of red flags on the confirmation of Hillary Clinton as Secretary of State.

 

Among the most egregious donors is the private military contractor

 

·       Blackwater USA. Mrs. Clinton's most obvious conflict-of-interest is next year when Blackwater's State Department contract comes up for renewal. Knowing the ways of the Clintons, it is not hard to see a quid pro quo between a Secretary of State Clinton and the very Republican and very right-wing Blackwater in the offing.

A spokesman for the Obama transition team had the audacity to claim that donations to the Clinton Foundation have no bearing on Clinton's job as Secretary of State. Oh, really? Have the Obama people ever heard of

 

·       Jackson Stephens of Little Rock's Stephens, Inc.? The Clintons and conflicts-of-interest go together like peanut butter and jelly.

 

One of the most astounding Clinton donors is the

 

·       Alavi Foundation. Alavi is the co-owner of a 36-story building on Fifth Avenue in Manhattan. On December 17, federal officials charged that Alavi's co-owner, Assa Corporation, is a front for

·        Iran's Bank Melli that funneled revenue from the building to Bank Melli via a front company in the Channel Islands.

·       Hillary Clinton has been a hawk on Iran and once suggested that she would launch a devastating military attack on the country. Apparently, the Clintons are not so hawkish when it comes to taking Iranian money in a pay-to-play' enterprise . . .

 

Bill Clinton certainly was a busy man as a globe-trotting panhandler. He managed to get donations from a number of foreign governments, including

 

·       Saudi Arbia,

·       Norway,

·       Oman,

·       Brunei,

·       Kuwait,

·       Qatar,

·       Australia,

·       Jamaica,

·       Ireland,

·       Taiwan,

·       Italy, and the

·       Canary Islands' Tenerife island government.

 

Other foreign donors include the

 

·       Netherlands National Postal Lottery,

·       Swiss Reinsurance Company, the

·       Swedish Postal Lottery,

·       China Overseas Real Estate Development,

·       Venezuela's Venevision TV network,

·       Credit Suisse (now under investigation for criminal money laundering,

·       National Opera of Paris,

·       South Africa's African Rainbow Minerals,

·       Bahrain Petroleum,

·       Beirut Container Terminal Consortium,

·       De Beers Marine Namibia,

·       National Bank of Kuwait,

·       Taiwan Mobile Foundation, Baltic International Bank,

·       Booz Allen Hamilton (now owned by

·       The Carlyle Group),

·       BNP Paribas,

·       Jordan Investment Trust,

·       Kenya Commercial Bank,

·       New Zealand Stock Exchange,

·       Newmont Mining Corp. (major gold mining company),

·       Occidental Petroleum Corporation,

·       Palestine Telecommunication Company,

·       Portugal Telecom,

·       Reykjavik Energy,

·       Society Tourism Diversions of Macau,

·       Taipei Fubon Commercial Bank Co Ltd.,

·       TD Bank Financial Group, De Beers Family of Companies,

·       Teva Pharmaceuticals Industries Ltd. of Israel,

·       First Philippine Holdings Corporation,

·       International Bank of Commerce of Laredo, Texas,

·       Oppenheimer Funds, Inc.,

·       Hutchison Whampoa Limited,PT. Polychem Indonesia,

·       Neptune Orient Lines Ltd. (Singapore),

·       Morgan Stanley Asia Limited, and

·       UBS Wealth Management.

Another major donor is Clinton Foundation trustee

 

·       Frank Giustra, a Canadian billionaire who made a windfall profit in 2006 after landing a huge uranium contract from

·       Kazakhstan's authoritarian President Nursultan Nazarbayev with Bill Clinton's help.

 

·       Haim Saban, the Israeli-American entertainment guru who supports Israeli interests over those of his adopted country, was also a multi-million dollar donor to Clinton's non-profit contrivance. (He is now a major donor to Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign).

Other major donors are

 

·       Saudi construction billionaire Nasser al-Rashid;

·       Dubai Emir Mohammad Rashid bin Maktoum, the majority owner of Dubai Ports World;

·        Gilbert Chagoury, a Lebanese Christian billionaire with sizable investments in oil-rich Nigeria; the

·       Zayed ruling family of Abu Dhabi;

·       Jordanian-Canadian Victor Dahdaleh,

·       chief of Dadco Group, who was once accused in a lawsuit of bribing Bahrain officials on behalf of Alcoa and using front companies in the British Virgin Islands, Singapore, and Switzerland;

·       Lebanese Houston-based Issam Fares,

·       a former Lebanese Deputy Prime Minister;

·       Indian mining mogul Lakshmi Mittal, aka "Taj Mittal," who has been accused of running slave labor mines in places like Kazakhstan;

·       Ukrainian Jewish mining oligarch Viktor Pinchuk; former Loral Chairman Bernard Schwartz, who was investigated for the transfer of sensitive missile technology to China;

·       URS Corporation's Richard Blum, the Iraq war profiteer husband of incoming Senate Intelligence Committee

·       Chairman Sen. Dianne Feinstein (D-CA) (Feinstein is now a major supporter lof Mrs. Clinton's presidential campaign);

·       Rupert Murdoch's News Corporation Foundation;

·       Little Rock billionaire and longtime Clinton financial supporter Jackson Stephens;

·       personal data mining giant Acxiom Inc,; scandal-plagued American International Group (AIG);

·       Denise Rich, the ex-wife of American-Swiss-Israeli billionaire fugitive Marc Rich;

·       Mexican telecommunications baron Carlos Slim Helu; former AES CEO and

·       secretive Arlington-based Fellowship Foundation supporter Dennis Bakke (Mrs. Clinton, while ostensibly a Methodist, is an adherent of the Fellowship Foundation and its longtime "guru" Douglas Coe);

·       Barrick Gold, whose international advisers have included Bill Clinton's golfing buddy George H. W. Bush;

·       Israel supporter Edgard Bronfman;

·       Lynn F. de Rothschild;

·       sub prime mortgage perpetrator Merrill Lynch;

·       Brazilian Jewish banking billionaire Joseph Safra of Safra Group (before

·       Brazilian President Dilma Rousseff was impeached by a cabal of wealthy Brazilians, her prosecutors criminally charged Safra, the world's richest banker, with bribery);

·       right-wing political funder Richard Mellon Scaife;

·       the American Jewish Committee; the

·       University of Judaism;

·       Iranian expatriate Farhad Azima, a longtime provider of air services to U.S. intelligence agencies;

·       Wall Street collapse perpetrator Goldman Sachs; Banque Privée Edmond De Rothschild;

·       Evelyn de Rothschild;

·       Lazare Kaplan International Inc.;

·       Rahm Emanuel, Lafarge Corporation (where Hillary Clinton once served as a director during a time when the firm was implicated in the shipment of restricted materials to Saddam Hussein);

·       The Chatterjee Group (which is linked to

·       Marvin Bush, brother of George W. Bush);

·       Wesley K. Clark and Associates;

·       Albanian-American Center for Information and Cooperation, and

·       World Vision.

 

·       Another donor was Citigroup and its

 

·        Citi Foundation. Citigroup is one of the recipients of the U.S. government's nearly $1 trillion bailout of Wall Street.
No conflict-of-interest there Mr. and Mrs. Clinton?

Another donor is

 

·       Mohammed Hussein al-Amoudi, a Saudi-Ethiopian billionaire who once threatened a libel lawsuit against this editor unless more than $100,000 was deposited in his foreign bank account. The attempted shakedown by this dubious individual was reported to the FBI.

·       Another donor is Jordanian-American businessman A. Huda Farouki, Nour USA and

·       Erinys Iraq majordomo who, like al-Amoudi, once threatened a libel lawsuit against this editor (and cost WMR at least $1200 in legal fees).

 

·       George Soros' Open Society Institute and the

 

·       Soros Foundation, which fund "themed" neocon revolutions and destabilizing political chicanery around the world, also kicked into the Clinton Foundation.

 

·       The Friends of Saudi Arabia,

 

·       Saudi billionaire businessman Walid Juffali, the

 

·       U.S. Islamic World Conference, and Saudi construction mogul Hamza al Kholi are among Clinton's donors.

With a donation from the

·       First Bank of Nigeria and Nigeria's Intercontinental Bank Plc, as well as

·       Nigeria's Obat Oil And Petroleum Limited, the Clintons may be the first successful recipients of Nigerian "419" money. Congratulations Bill and Hillary!

 

 

Bill's global panhandling is a

 disgrace to the United States.

 

Obama's selection of the other half of Clinton & Clinton, Inc. as Secretary of State is also a disgrace. Hillary Clinton is unsuitable to be Secretary of State since she and her husband are walking and talking conflicts-of-interest.

 

'The List' proves that they are

nothing more than political prostitutes

of the Nth degree."

 

"The List" also shows why Mrs. Clinton and her husband's business partners at the investment/lobbying firm

 

·       Teneo were required to exchange emails through a private server in the basement of the Clintons' home in Chappaqua. Any improper emails sent through the official State Department telecommunications networks would have been subject to Freedom of Information Act requests.

·       It was not murder and mayhem in Chicago that got Al Capone convicted but his sloppy accounting practices that landed him and his ledger books in hot water with the Internal Revenue Service. If only old Al had a private email server.

Cabal Meets To Discuss Death To The People

Rothschild Banking Cabal Meets To Discuss Death To The People Before Justice Arrives On Their Doorstep

“World population needs to be decreased by 50%” 

— Dr. Henry Kissinger

National Security Study Memorandum (NSSM 200) A.K.A. “The Kissinger Report” (released internally late December of 1974) was crafted by globalist advisor, eugenicist, former Secretary of State, and director of the National Security Council (NSC) during the Ford and Nixon era, Henry Kissinger.

  AGENDA 21 --  EUGENICS AND DEPOPULATION

• Breaking ~ 3/8/2016 ~ France: Entire Swiss Branch Of Rothschild’s Banking Empire Under Criminal Investigation Following David De Rothschild Conspiracy Indictment.

This memorandum is one of many indicators that diabolic withering potbelly globalists want a major portion of the world populace dead, and are in the midst of exterminating humans incrementally, and have been for some time.

1. Celebrate Black History Month With Obama: The Damage!

The document (declassified in 1989) reads like a horror story.
“Part One” starts off with an analytical section mentioning, world demographic trends, population problems,food supply issues and more — then ends with details about the “World Population Conference” (a group of diabolic oligarchs that decide our fate).

Item #3 in the “Executive Summary” states;

Because of the momentum of population dynamics, reductions in birth rates affect total numbers only slowly. High birth rates in the recent past have resulted in a high proportion m the youngest age groups, so that there will continue to be substantial population increases over many years even if a two-child family should become the norm in the future. Policies to reduce fertility will have their main effects on total numbers only after several decades. However, if future numbers are to be kept within reasonable bounds, it is urgent that measures to reduce fertility be started and made effective in the 1970′s and 1980′s. Moreover, programs started now to reduce birth rates will have short run advantages for developing countries in lowered demands on food, health and educational and other services and in enlarged capacity to contribute to productive investments, thus accelerating development.

Natalie Portman [to the left of Jacob Rothschild] Is Brought Before The Banking Devils. Natalie Was The Star Of The Movie “Vendetta” Which Exposes The Dark Side Of The Criminal Greed Of The NWO Banking Cockroaches. Vendetta Transcends From The Roman Catholic Movement Spearheaded By Guy Fawkes [Father Of Anonymous] Against King Henry VIII’s Regicide Puritan Movement Who Killed A King And Trashed England’s Magna Carta. 

You can also see here the piece of criminal shit known as Henry Kissinger who was also part and partial for bringing about General Patton’s death. U.S. by Cabal’s doctrine Is Not To Have Heroes!

The report moves proclaim that “they” (potbelly globalist oligarchs) need to stabilize the population worldwide, showing world population figures at the time of 1970 at 3.6 billion and projecting 12 billion by 2075.

1. HAARP Weather Modification Hits Chihuahua Mexico ~ Home To Mitt Romney’s Father: Drought Threatens 2.5 Million Mexicans By Starvation!

The report also mentions the potential for famines in the future. Here is an excerpt from #6;

The most serious consequence for the short and middle term is the possibility of massive famines in certain parts of the world, especially the poorest regions.

Section #10 goes on to detail how the elite will profit less from having a larger number of people worldwide, stating;

Rapid population growth creates a severe drag on rates of economic development otherwise attainable, sometimes to the point of preventing any increase in per capita incomes. In addition to the overall impact on per capita incomes, rapid population growth seriously affects a vast range of other aspects of the quality of life important to social and economic progress in the LDCs.

And then there is the ultimatum (#23) — it reads as follows;

The central question for world population policy in the year 1974, is whether mankind is to remain on a track toward an ultimate population of 12 to 15 billion — implying a five to seven-fold increase in almost all the underdeveloped world outside of China — or whether (despite the momentum of population growth) it can be switched over to the course of earliest feasible population stability — implying ultimate totals of 8 to 9 billions and not more than a three or four-fold increase in any major region.

WOW! — Did you get that?     

Here are some of the policy recommendations mentioned in The Kissinger Report;

26. There is no single approach which will “solve” the population problem. The complex social and economic factors involved call for a comprehensive strategy with both bilateral and multilateral elements. At the same time actions and programs must be tailored to specific countries and groups. Above all, LDCs themselves must play the most important role to achieve success.

27. Coordination among the bilateral donors and multilateral organizations is vital to any effort to moderate population growth. Each kind of effort will be needed for worldwide results.

28. World policy and programs in the population field should incorporate two major objectives:

(a) actions to accommodate continued population growth up to 6 billions by the mid-21st century without massive starvation or total frustration of developmental hopes; and

(b) actions to keep the ultimate level as close as possible to 8 billions rather than permitting it to reach 10 billions, 13 billions, or more.

29. While specific goals in this area are difficult to state, our aim should be for the world to achieve a replacement level of fertility, (a two- child family on the average), by about the year 2000. This will require the present 2 percent growth rate to decline to 1.7 percent within a decade and to 1.1 percent by 2000 compared to the U.N medium projection, this goal would result in 500 million fewer people in 2000 and about 3 billion fewer in 2050. Attainment of this goal will require greatly intensified population programs. A basis for developing national population growth control targets to achieve this world target is contained in the World Population Plan of Action.

30. The World Population Plan of Action is not self-enforcing and will require vigorous efforts by interested countries, U.N. agencies and other international bodies to make it effective. U.S. leadership is essential. The strategy must include the following elements and actions:

1. Sorry Tommy Coburn: Obama & The Banking Cartel Already Cut Education Assistance By $100 Billion, Already Cut Food Stamps By $2.2 Billion, & Health Care By +$6.6 Billion.

Concentration on key countries

(a) Assistance for population moderation should give primary emphasis to the largest and fastest growing developing countries where there is special U.S. political and strategic interest. Those countries are: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Nigeria, Mexico, Indonesia, Brazil, the Philippines, Thailand, Egypt, Turkey, Ethiopia and Columbia. Together, they account for 47 percent of the world’s current population increase. (It should be recognized that at present AID bilateral assistance to some of these countries may not be acceptable.)

Bilateral assistance, to the extent that funds are available, will be given to other countries, considering such factors as population growth, need for external assistance, long-term U.S. interests and willingness to engage in self help.

Multilateral programs must necessarily have a wider coverage and the bilateral programs of other national donors will be shaped to their particular interests. At the same time, the U.S. will look to the multilateral agencies, especially the U.N. Fund for Population Activities which already has projects in over 80 countries to increase population assistance on a broader basis with increased U.S. contributions. This is desirable in terms of U.S. interests and necessary in political terms in the United Nations. But progress nevertheless, must be made in the key 13 and our limited resources should give major emphasis to them.

(b) Integration of population factors and population programs into country development planning. As called for the world Population Plan of Action, developing countries and those aiding them should specifically take population factors into account in national planning and include population programs in such plans.

(c) Increased assistance for family planning services, information and technology. This is a vital aspect of any world population program.

1) Family planning information and materials based on present technology should be made fully available as rapidly as possible to the 85 % of the populations in key LDCs not now reached, essentially rural poor who have the highest fertility.

2) Fundamental and evelopmental research should be expanded, aimed at simple, low-cost, effective, safe, long-lasting and acceptable methods of fertility control. Support by all federal agencies for biomedical research in this field should be increased by $60 million annually.

(d) Creating conditions conducive to fertility decline. For its own merits and consistent with the recommendations of the World Population Plan of Action, priority should be given in the general aid program to selective development policies in sectors offering the greatest promise of increased motivation for smaller family size. In many cases pilot programs and experimental research will be needed as guidance for later efforts on a larger scale.

The preferential sectors include:
– Providing minimal levels of education, especially for women;
– Reducing infant mortality, including through simple low cost health care networks;
– Expanding wage employment, especially for women; — Developing alternatives to children as a source of old age security;
– Increasing income of the poorest, especially in rural areas, including providing privately owned farms;
– Education of new generations on the desirability of smaller families.

While AID has information on the relative importance of the new major socio- economic factors that lead to lower birth rates, much more research and experimentation need to be done to determine what cost effective programs and policy will lead to lower birth rates.

(e) Food and agricultural assistance is vital for any population sensitive

development strategy. The provision of adequate food stocks for a growing population in times of shortage is crucial. Without such a program for the LDCs there is considerable chance that such shortage will lead to conflict and adversely affect population goals and developmental efforts. Specific recommendations are included in Section IV (c) of this study.

(f) Development of a worldwide political and popular commitment to population stabilization is fundamental to any effective strategy. This requires the support and commitment of key LDC leaders. This will only take place if they clearly see the negative impact of unrestricted population growth and believe it is possible to deal with this question through governmental action.

The U.S. should encourage LDC leaders to take the lead in advancing family planning and population stabilization both within multilateral organizations and through bilateral contacts with other LDCs. This will require that the President and the Secretary of State treat the subject of population growth control as a matter of paramount importance and address it specifically in their regular contacts with leaders of other governments, particularly LDCs.

31. The World Population Plan of Action and the resolutions adopted by consensus by 137 nations at the August 1974 U.N. World Population Conference, though not ideal, provide an excellent framework for developing a worldwide system of population/ family planning programs. We should use them to generate U.N. agency and national leadership for an all-out effort to lower growth rates. Constructive action by the U.S. will further our objectives. To this end we should:

(a) Strongly support the World Population Plan of Action and the adoption of its appropriate provisions in national and other programs.

(b) Urge the adoption by national programs of specific population goals including replacement levels of fertility for DCs and LDCs by 2000.

(c) After suitable preparation in the U.S., announce a U.S. goal to maintain our present national average fertility no higher than replacement level and attain near stability by 2000.

(d) Initiate an international cooperative strategy of national research programs on human reproduction and fertility control covering biomedical and socio-economic factors, as proposed by the U.S. Delegation at Bucharest.

(e) Act on our offer at Bucharest to collaborate with other interested donors and U.N. agencies to aid selected countries to develop low cost preventive health and family planning services.

(f) Work directly with donor countries and through the U.N.Fund for Population Activities and the OECD/DAC to increase bilateral and multilateral assistance for population programs.

32. As measures to increase understanding of population factors by LDC leaders and to strengthen population planning in national development plans, we should carry out the recommendations in Part II, Section VI, including:

(a) Consideration of population factors and population policies in all Country Assistance Strategy Papers (CASP) and Development Assistance Program (DAP) multi-year strategy papers.

(b) Prepare projections of population growth individualized for countries with analyses of development of each country and discuss them with national leaders.

(c) Provide for greatly increased training programs for senior officials of LDCs in the elements of demographic economics.

(d) Arrange for familiarization programs at U.N. Headquarters in New York for ministers of governments, senior policy level officials and comparably influential leaders from private life.

(e) Assure assistance to LDC leaders in integrating population factors in national plans, particularly as they relate to health services, education, agricultural resources and development, employment, equitable distribution of income and social stability.

(f) Also assure assistance to LDC leaders in relating population policies and family planning programs to major sectors of development health, nutrition, agriculture, education, social services, organized labor, women’s activities, and community development.

(g) Undertake initiatives to implement the Percy Amendment regarding improvement in the status of women.

(h) Give emphasis in assistance to programs on development of rural areas.
Beyond these activities which are essentially directed at national interests, we must assure that a broader educational concept is developed to convey an acute understanding to national leaders of the interrelation of national interests and world population growth.

33. We must take care that our activities should not give the appearance to the LDCs of an industrialized country policy directed against the LDCs. Caution must be taken that in any approaches in this field we support in the LDCs are ones we can support within this country.

“Third World” leaders should be in the forefront and obtain the credit for successful programs. In this context it is important to demonstrate to LDC leaders that such family planning programs have worked and can work within a reasonable period of time.

1. Obama Destroys Middle Class: 9.1% Currently Receiving Unemployment Insurance ~ While +22% Currently Have No Unemployment Insurance ~So You’re Given Food Stamps! Productivity Falls, Government Debt Goes Up ~ Perfect Socialism!

34. To help assure others of our intentions we should indicate our emphasis on the right of individuals and couples to determine freely and responsibly the number and spacing of their children and to have information, education and means to do so, and our continued interest in improving the overall general welfare.

We should use the authority provided by the World Population Plan of Action to advance the principles that:

1) responsibility in parenthood includes responsibility to the children and the community and

2) that nations in exercising their sovereignty to set population policies should take into account the welfare of their neighbors and the world. To strengthen the worldwide approach, family planning programs should be supported by multilateral organizations wherever they can provide the most efficient means.

35. To support such family planning and related development assistance efforts there is need to increase public and leadership information in this field. We recommend increased emphasis on mass media, newer communications technology and other population education and motivation programs by the UN and USIA. Higher priority should be given to these information programs in this field worldwide.

36. In order to provide the necessary resources and leadership, support by the U.S. public and Congress will be necessary. A significant amount of funds will be required for a number of years. High level personal contact by the Secretary of State and other officials on the subject at an early date with Congressional counterparts is needed. A program for this purpose should be developed by OES with H and AID.

37. There is an alternative view which holds that a growing number of experts believe that the population situation is already more serious and less amenable to solution through voluntary measures than is generally accepted.

It holds that, to prevent even more widespread food shortage and other demographic catastrophes than are generally anticipated, even stronger measures are required and some fundamental, very difficult moral issues need to be addressed. These include, for example, our own consumption patterns, mandatory programs, tight control of our food resources. In view of the seriousness of these issues, explicit consideration of them should begin in the Executive Branch, the Congress and the U.N. soon. (See the end of Section I for this viewpoint.)

1. Tarball Obama, Forces America’s Doctors To Violate The Hippocratic Oath: Its Back To The Nazi Concentration Camps!

38. Implementing the actions discussed above (in paragraphs 1-36), will require a significant expansion in AID funds for population/family planning. A number of major actions in the area of creating conditions for fertility decline can be funded from resources available to the sectors in question (e.g., education, agriculture). Other actions, including family planning services, research and experimental activities on factors effecting fertility, come under population funds.

We recommend increases in AID budget requests to the Congress on the order of $35-50 million annually through FY 1980 (above the $137.5 million requested for FY 1975). This funding would cover both bilateral programs and contributions to multilateral organizations. However, the level of funds needed in the future could change significantly, depending on such factors as major breakthroughs in fertility control technologies and LDC receptivities to population assistance.

To help develop, monitor, and evaluate the expanded actions discussed above, AID is likely to need additional direct hire personnel in the population/family planning area. As a corollary to expanded AID funding levels for population, efforts must be made to encourage increased contributions by other donors and recipient countries to help reduce rapid population growth.

I will leave you with this inscription on the Georgia Guide Stones:  

“Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature” — Anonymously commissioned Georgia Guidestones

The Intel Hub

Related articles

• The Sebelius In The Footsteps Of White Supremacist Margaret Sanger: Founder Of Planned Parenthood & In Court With Shredded Evidence!
• An Overview of the History of Depopulation Ideas (lazarus5712.wordpress.com)
• Depopulation & Henry Kissinger !!! (2012patriot.wordpress.com)
• Bombshell Drops From Child Actor: “The No. 1 Problem In Hollywood Was And Is And Always Will Be Pedophilia” : Demon’s Kiss!
• How Heathenism Stops A Thinking Brain!
• Fanatic Presidential Candidate Romney, Voted For Population-Control.
• Obama Cuts Education Assistance By $100 Billion, Cut Food Stamps By $2.2 Billion, & Health Care By +$6.6 Billion.
• New ‘Slave’ World Order
• Weekend Reflections: Obama’s Austerity Care ~ Seniors Must Submit To Counseling For End-Of-Life.
• Federal Government’s Corporate Gun: Pedophilia ~ A Non-Enforcement Policy In Socializing Pleasures Of Evil.
• Dismantling Obama’s Agenda: The Corrupted Politicians.
• AIDS HIV Pandemic: Obama Nominates Another Openly Anal Addicted Judicial Candidate. Human Genome Project _ No Genetic Cause Of Same Sex Attraction Disorder – Its A Choice!
• Michael Jackson & The Illuminati: Video
• United States Under Attack By The International Banking Cartel ~ Impeach Rothschild’s Obama! David Carradine, Russo, 2Pac, Ledger, Lee, & Jackson, Murdered.

https://politicalvelcraft.org/2012/02/03/rothschild-banking-cabal-meets-to-discuss-death-to-the-people-before-justice-arrives-on-their-doorstep/ 

ANONYMOUS message to all American People (Warning about Trump and Hilla...

11

The Biggest Secret Ever Kept In History REVEALED!

11

Armed Patriots Prepare to Defend Against Federal Encroachment: “This Is The Beginning of The Revolution”

The federal government has amassed incredible centralized power, and there is an attempt to undermine liberty. There are many who are getting prepared and staying vigilant, for whatever may come.

 

 

It seems that many voices within the federal government are quite concerned about the growing patriot movement throughout the country, and especially in rural strongholds where land and liberty go hand and hand.

More events like the Bundy Ranch standoff seem likely to occur, as the BLM and other agencies show no sign of changing policies, and more and more individuals are waking up to the abuses and tyrannies taking place.

It is isn’t just hypothetical – environmental regulations and bureaucratic land management continues to undermine ranchers and farmers who are, in many cases, forced out of business or taxed & penalized to death.

Many are refusing to take it lying down, and groups across the country are training and preparing in case of the worst – a standoff with the feds over land and their very way of life.

According to the Washington Post:

Deep in the heart of a vast U.S. military training ground, surrounded by spent shotgun shells and juniper trees blasted to shreds, the Central Oregon Constitutional Guard was conducting its weekly firearms training.

“The intent is to be able to work together and defend ourselves if we need to,” said Soper, 40, a building contractor who is an emerging leader in a growing national movement rooted in distrust of the federal government, one that increasingly finds itself in armed conflicts with authorities.

Those in the movement call themselves patriots, demanding that the federal government adhere to the Constitution and stop what they see as systematic abuse of land rights, gun rights, freedom of speech and other liberties.

Law enforcement officials call them dangerous, delusional and sometimes violent, and say that their numbers are growing amid a wave of anger at the government that has been gaining strength since 2008, a surge that coincided with the election of the first black U.S. president and a crippling economic recession.
[…]

“It doesn’t say in our Constitution that you can’t stand up and defend yourself,” Soper said. “We’ve let the government step over the line and rule us, and that was never the intent of this country.”

That virulent strain of resistance, despite being the very stuff the country was founded upon and which much of its character is made up of, has the government and its supporting voices quite worried.

The powers-that-be are downright freaked out that so many individuals are willing to put their life on the line for principled reasons… and recognize the historical dilemma between quelling a rebellion and creating martyrs that can, in turn, inspire more to stand up.

The Washington Post spent thousands of words on the growing conflict, which organizations like the Southern Poverty Law Center and Anti-Defamation League see as a “second wave” of the violent militia movement they say characterized the atmosphere surrounding Waco, Ruby Ridge, and the Oklahoma City Bombing:

The movement received a huge boost from the 2014 standoff at Cliven Bundy’s ranch in Nevada […] Bundy’s supporters claimed victory and were emboldened to stage similar armed face-offs last year at gold mines in Oregon and Montana.

In January, dozens of armed occupiers, led by Bundy’s sons Ammon and Ryan, took over the headquarters buildings of the Malheur National Wildlife Refuge…
[…]

Shortly after the Bundy ranch confrontation, two of Bundy’s supporters who had been at the ranch, Jerad and Amanda Miller, killed two police officers and a civilian and also died in a Las Vegas shooting rampage. Police said the couple left a note on the body of one the officers they had shot point-blank.

It said: “This is the beginning of the revolution.”

Of course, it is important to note that the SPLC and groups like it love to conflate together radical individuals like the Millers – who were suspect to the Bundy Ranch crowd and asked to disassociate and leave the site long before they ever carried out their Bonnie and Clyde-like massacre.

Most people lumped into this category are nothing like Jerad and Amanda Miller, who sought conflict.

But one thing that is common to nearly everyone is a sense of being fed up. People recognize that there is a problem, that tyranny is taking place, and are on watch for potential abuses from the government.

Whatever happens next, these constitutionally-minded patriots are prepared. They are training with guns, survival skills, communications and working out scenarios.

Everyone in the group keeps 30 days’ worth of food and emergency supplies on hand. Group members learn gardening and raising livestock. They go camping and learn survival tactics, including how to fashion a shelter, find food and water, and make a fire.

McNeely and Lisa Soper are taking an emergency medical technician class to learn to treat wounds, including combat trauma. They all are working on getting ham-radio licenses to communicate in the event that the cellphone network fails.
But a bedrock of their mission is to be an armed and trained paramilitary force. Soper said group members train on “basic infantry” skills: “working a patrol, patrolling with a vehicle, arriving at ‘contact’ and how to protect yourself and escape from that.”

“We are not soldiers,” Soper said. “But we know the basics.”

B.J. Soper, who was heavily profiled in the Washington Post story, typifies the sense of disillusionment with how far the federal government has gone, and how important the role of complacency among the populace has been – until now:

“I was very disappointed with myself,” he said. “I realized that we’re here in the predicament that we’re in as a country because my generation, and my parents’ generation, have done nothing. We let this happen. We got used to our cushy lives where everything’s easy. We have forgotten what’s really important. We’ve forgotten what liberty and freedom really mean.”

It was like being shaken out of a lifetime of slumber, he said: “Before 2014, I was blind. I wasn’t awake. I wasn’t paying attention. But Bundy Ranch woke me up.”

Suddenly, his weekends watching the San Francisco 49ers or the Portland Trail Blazers seemed like anesthesia numbing him against real life.
[…]

Soper, who carries a pocket Constitution with him everywhere, said he thinks the Constitution does not give the federal government the right to own land, and that the government’s increasing emphasis on environmental regulations is putting ranchers, miners, loggers and others out of work and devastating local economies.

“We need to be able to raise and grow food,” Soper said. “Wealth comes from the land. I want to take into consideration endangered frogs. But at the same time, that frog can’t be more important than the survival of the human race.”

In past years, these media outlets and so-called “watchdogs” have relied heavily on trying to make those in the patriot movement appear “crazy” and “deranged”… but that really won’t work anymore. Ordinary people everywhere can see what is going on through streaming video and information on the Internet.

Not everyone is perfect, but there is a real honest backbone of genuine concern about the direction things have taken in this country.

The federal government has amassed incredible centralized power, and there is an attempt to undermine liberty.

There are many who are getting prepared and staying vigilant, for whatever may come.

Article reposted with permission from SHTF Plan