NWO is wounded, Trump will give DEATH BLOW! NO Apologies! END WHITE GUILT NOW!

Tyron Parsons for and by the http://www.MaineRepublicEmailAlert.com

 .

AMERICA

NO APOLOGIES!! END WHITE GUILT NOW!!

.

In a short and powerful message, he glorifies our achievements and exposes the agenda of those who’d try to make us feel “guilty” for them.

Spread this around and cure your friends of their “White guilt”!

Basically, Donald Trump did Brexit. I believe this to be a solid fact. If they would have known Trump was coming, they never would have agreed to schedule the referendum.

When they scheduled it two years ago, they also didn’t know Merkel was going to invite trillions of gang-raping Islamic terrorists to come live in London. This is all a gigantic accident by the elite/Jews

.

Dump Trump lacks votes

.

Cleveland’s Unconstitutional RNC Police State Exposed

.

Double Victory: Brexit Win And Free Speech Restored At RNC

.

.

UK Turns to Trump, Says Good Riddance to ‘Disastrous, Bankrupt’ EU

The NWO Is Wounded, And Trump Will Deal It A Death Blow

.

Trump affirms “the sacred right of all free peoples” to self-determination

.

Donald J. Trump Statement Regarding British Referendum on E.U. Membership

The vote to leave the EU was a rejection of immigration and multiculturalism.

.

Congratulations on Brexit!RAMZPAUL: BREXIT – A Victory Against Globalism!

Both countries are rejecting (((elite))) consensus.

.

As Britain Decided Its Future, Striking Parallels with U.S. Political Debates Emerged

.

First The UK, Then Scotland… Then Texas?

.

WashPost: America Can’t Declare Economic Independence Because Not Enough Whites – Breitbart

.

Hillary clearly shows who’s side she is on

.

Hillary Clinton Sounds The Alarm After Brexit; Warns Of ‘Economic Uncertainty’ – Breitbart

.

Darrell Issa: There Is Enough Evidence to Indict Hillary Clinton

.

Day of the rope is coming!!

.

Dem Lawmaker: Only Politicians Get To Have Gun Protection

“Jews” don’t want white Americans with AR 15s while their citizens in “Israel” have them and now the IRS is getting them too.

Supreme Court Rules Cops Can Break the Law to Enforce the Law

In another devastating blow to the 4th Amendment, on Monday, the Supreme Court ruled that evidence of an alleged crime can be used against a defendant even if police did something inappropriate or even illegal to obtain it.

by Matt Agorist

In a split 5-3 decision, the justices voted to reinstate the drug-related convictions of Joseph Edward Strieff.

In the case of Strieff, he was illegally detained during a “concededly unconstitutional detention,” which eventually led to the discovery of drugs inside his vehicle.

In Strieff’s case, a trial court judge later found that the officer did not have enough evidence to initially stop and question him.

But the judge ruled that Strieff’s subsequent arrest on an outstanding traffic warrant justified the search — implying that the use of criminal behavior to catch criminal behavior is just.

The Utah Court of Appeals agreed with the trial court that the drug evidence was admissible at trial, but, in a moment of logic, the Utah Supreme Court last year reversed that decision.

The Utah Supreme Court noted in its January 2015 decision that the case presented “a gap of substantial significance” in terms of prior rulings by the U.S. Supreme Court on Fourth Amendment issues, and that other courts that have addressed the issue have come to “substantially different conclusions” regarding search and seizure law.

The Fourth Amendment exclusionary rule allows criminal defendants to suppress “fruit of the poisonous tree” — that is, evidence obtained as a result of a search or seizure that violates the Fourth Amendment.

The reason this rule exists is due to the obvious conflict of interests in cops breaking the law to enforce the law.

However, thanks to Monday’s ruling by the Supreme Court, that is exactly what will happen now.

Police have essentially been given a free pass to violate the rights of individuals — just so long as they find evidence of a ‘crime.’

On Monday, the logic applied by the Utah Supreme Court in 2015, was thrown to the wayside in a handout to the police state.

Given the reality of the militarized police state rising up from the horrors of the war on drugs, the fact that cops can now legally act illegally to bust people for possessing arbitrary substances is chilling.

As if breaking the law wasn’t enough, prior to this ruling, police were no longer required to even give the appearance of an understanding of the laws they’re tasked with enforcing, thanks to a recent court decision surpassing even the veritable green light previously granted in Heien v. North Carolina.

In the Heien case, the Supreme Court ruled a “police officer’s reasonable mistake of law gives rise to reasonable suspicion that justifies a traffic stop under the Fourth Amendment.”

A motorist’s broken tail light caused an officer to make a traffic stop — during which evidence of a separate violation of the law was discovered in the vehicle.

But in North Carolina, a broken tail light wasn’t illegal, thus not sufficient cause to justify the stop — nor the arrests stemming from it, lawyers argued, because that would be a violation of unreasonable searches and seizures.

However, the Supreme Court ruled the officer’s ignorance of the law essentially didn’t matter — effectively allowing police around the country the ability to make stops if they ‘reasonably’ believe the cause for the stop is legal.

Plainly, police can stop and search you despite ignorance of the law.

Now, in U.S. v Shelton Barnes et. al. — a case that seemed to slip by largely unnoticed — even that flimsy justification has been deemed too constricting of police power, and police ignorance can actually be used against you in a trial.

On Monday, Justice Sonia Sotomayor said in dissent that the decision in Utah vs. Edward Joseph Strieff, is a blow to constitutional rights.

“The court today holds that the discovery of a warrant for an unpaid parking ticket will forgive a police officer’s violation of your Fourth Amendment rights,” Sotomayor wrote.

Sotomayor’s dissent was joined by Justice Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Justice Elena Kagan.

Now, police need not understand the law, or even abide by the law — to enforce the law. In what world is this considered acceptable?

Anonymous - Message to the Citizens of America

11

Hillary Clinton - Two Separate Ongoing FBI Investigations

CORRUPT TO THE CORE:  TWO SEPARATE ONGOING FBI INVESTIGATIONS OF HILLARY CLINTON

June 23, 2016
Alexandra Bruce

 

Judge Napolitano joins Fox Business' Stuart Varney to discuss the two criminal investigations of Hillary Clinton being conducted now by two separate FBI units, one of which brought down General David Patraeus. 

The first unit is investigating potential breaches of National Security involving the infamous Internet server that Hillary kept in her house in Chappaqua, NY. 

Throughout her tenure as Secretary of State, she used private email accounts in her official communications instead of secure State Department accounts in violation of US Government policy. Thousands of her emails were retroactively marked as 'Classified'.

She breached her security clearance and violated the Federal laws regulating record-keeping, with her suspicious deletion of 31,000 emails from her home server, also raising questions as to why these were deleted. 

Hillary is facing the possibility of being charged with failure to protect National Security Secrets, among other charges. 

The second criminal FBI investigation involves "Public Corruption" relating to the Clinton Foundation itself. The allegations against her are that she used her position as Secretary of State to personally enrich herself and her husband by doing favors for foreign governments and receiving hundreds of millions of dollars in contributions to the Clinton Foundation in return. According to some sources, Saudi Arabia is responsible for 20% of Hillary's campaign contributions. 

An extreme example of irregular activity (among many others) involves Bill Clinton's friend, Frank Giustra, a Canadian who asked Hillary for permission to own shares in a uranium mine in Utah. As Secretary of State, she had the power to grant this permission to a foreign national - which she did do.

Giustra turned around and sold 80% of his shares to Vladimir Putin. So now a Russian corporation owns the lion's share of a uranium mine on US soil - and that corporation is owned by the similarly-corrupt Vladimir Putin.

Now get this: Giustra subsequently contributed $145 million from the proceeds of the sale of his shares in the uranium mine to the Clinton Foundation. Records of this transaction would likely be on the Clinton server but in order to subpoena them, a Grand Jury would need to be summoned.

Napolitano notes that if a Grand Jury is sitting and issuing subpoenas, they have succeeded in keeping it totally quiet. This story managed to stay under the radar until Donald Trump mentioned it in his June 22nd speech in New York City in which he promised to discuss it further, to shine a light on Hillary's judgment, character and fitness (lack thereof of all three) to be President of the United States.

How could a Presidential candidate involve herself in a transaction like this, unless she was totally accustomed to skating past the law as a inveterate arch-criminal? There are many other irregularities with the Clinton Foundation, like monies donated to charities that didn't exist, monies missing, etc.

In a shocking mirror of scandals currently rocking the Brazilian government this is, as Napolitano puts it, "The intersection of law enforcement, politics and the Presidency, all at once!" (and money, too).

Is the corrupt mentality that Hillary exercised during her tenure as 

Secretary of State something that Americans would like to see continued with her as President?

What if charges are brought against her after elected President?

A lot has been said lately about the entrenched corruption of the Brazilian government - but the antics of the Clinton Foundation make those guys look like a bunch of pikers.  All of the kickbacks and bribery committed by the crooks in the Brazilian government put together cannot begin to equal the enormity of the corruption of the self-proclaimed Democratic Party nominee for President of the US. This is not because the corrupt Brazilian politicians are her moral superiors but because representatives of the Brazilian government don't have anything like the geopolitical influence to peddle, as did the former US Secretary of State.

Notice that I'm retracting a previous statement in which I referred to Hillary as the Democratic Party nominee. I was corrected by a subscriber who apprised me of the fact that ballots in the pivotal State of California are still being re-counted more than two weeks after that state's June 7 Primary Election, where there was massive evidence of vote fraud, as detailed here. 

The creator of that clip notes that, "The sheer mass of the election fraud that took place in California was staggering and is unlike anything we have seen in decades. It is estimated that 2 out of every 3 Bernie Sanders votes were not counted during the California primary election. We will explain in detail how the election was rigged and provide our sources."

As we've seen, vote fraud is just the tip of the iceberg in the vast criminal enterprise of the former Secretary of State, a hawkish Neocon who has stated that she is not against the tactic of "limited nuclear warfare". 

Among Hillary's advisers is Project for a New American Century (PNAC) Co-Founder, Robert Kagan, who espouses Perpetual War as the standard operating procedure for the US; to indefinitely impose its military power, seeking to dominate the world in a unipolar fashion. 

Hillary did her part to carry out this policy during her stint as Secretary of State and would undoubtedly continue along the same lines as President. This, at a time when this policy is no longer viable, to say nothing about desirable. 

Proponents of this policy recently passed a resolution which would enable the military draft of US women as the only way to maintain the "endless wars" of the past 15 years. As I've stated previously, it's my opinion that this Neocon tactic is primarily greed-driven war profiteering and disaster capitalism, utterly debased and devoid of human values, just like their candidate, Hillary Clinton.

Video: (5 and a half mins):

Corrupt to the Core: Two Separate Ongoing FBI Investigations of Hillary Clinton

Judge Napolitano ~ Most People Have Forgotten
There Are 2 Criminal FBI Investigations Of Clinton 

Jun 23, 2016 | Alexandra Bruce

http://forbiddenknowledgetv.net/corrupt-to-the-core-two-separate-ongoing-fbi-investigations-of-hillary-clinton-27730

http://campaign.r20.constantcontact.com/render?m=1108369064136&ca=78760506-02bf-4a73-9bd4-b02173dd172b

 

Millions Already RFID Chipped

SHOCKING! Millions Already RFID Chipped

 Under OBAMACARE Without Consent!  

Brexit - What does it mean?

Brexit - What does it mean?

Special Report

In December, 2012, the United States National Intelligence Council (NIC) published their latest 5-year report that forecasts long-term implications and is titled Global Trends 2030: Alternative Worlds:
 
The purpose of this document, the NIC says, is: “We are at a critical juncture in human history, which could lead to widely contrasting futures.  It is our contention that the future is not set in stone, but is malleable, the result of an interplay among mega trends, game-changers and, above all, human agency. Our effort is to encourage decision makers—whether in government or outside—to think and plan for the long term so that negative futures do not occur and positive ones have a better chance of unfolding.”

In planning for a future the NIC says is “not set in stone” and is “malleable”, they pose the question: “Will the US be able to work with new partners to reinvent the international system?”

This question leads one to then ask what kind of future does the NIC envision?  And they answer this question by positing these 4 scenarios:  

- Stalled Engines: In the most plausible worst-case scenario, the risks of interstate conflict increase. The US draws inward and globalization stalls.

- Fusion: In the most plausible best-case outcome, China and the US collaborate on a range of issues, leading to broader global cooperation.

- Gini-Out-of-the-Bottle: Inequalities explode as some countries become big winners and others fail. Inequalities within countries increase social tensions. Without completely disengaging, the US is no longer the “global policeman.”

- Nonstate World: Driven by new technologies, nonstate actors take the lead in confronting global challenges.

By these 4 scenarios posited by the NIC, and as anyone can plainly see, the US in its attempt to “reinvent the international system” clearly prefers the Fusion option where it joins with China to create a bi-polar world where these two powers reign supreme with the rest of the world being divided up into more manageable Nonstate Actors that would pose no threat to either of them.

For anyone to fully understand what the NIC, and hence US global policy, is trying to achieve one must also know who they are against—and in its most simplistic term is called the Nation State.

A state is specifically a political and geopolitical entity, while a nation is a cultural and ethnic one, and we know them today as countries—like the United States, United Kingdom, Japan, Germany, etc., and that have only been in existence since 1648. 

In the aftermath of the 20^th Century “total war” concept that decimated entire empires and nations, and killed hundreds-of-millions of people the world over, and spurred on by instant global communications and fast, cheap travel, the nation state was viewed by the Western ruling 'elites' as a quaint, even dangerous anachronism—and in the late 1990’s two critical and very important international policy papers titled The Demise of the Nation State and The Demise of the Nation-State: Towards a New Theory of the State under International Law began providing the intellectual road map on how to destroy them. 

Only by understanding the hatred the Western 'elites' have against nation states can one then begin to fathom the truest meaning of Brexit where the United Kingdom voted to exit the European Union—and which has very predictably led to Scotland saying they might leave the UK, London might become its own nation, five other nations might leave the EU, and even the State of Texas saying, once again, they might become a separate nation, too.  

From your propaganda Western 'elitist' media, all you’re going to hear about Brexit (and the rise of Donald Trump, too) and its deeper meaning is that it was fueled by a right-wing nationalist movement fueled by anger toward political 'elites' and mistrust of immigration — and primarily backed by white voters — who are gaining more and more momentum in both Europe and the United States. 

Even worse, the propaganda from these 'elites' are also reaching near hysterical levels, too—such as the former US Federal Reserve Chairman Alan Greenspan warning yesterday: “This is the worst period, I recall since I've been in public service. There's nothing like it, including the crisis — remember October 19th, 1987, when the Dow went down by a record amount 23 percent? That I thought was the bottom of all potential problems. This has a corrosive effect that will not go away. I'd love to find something positive to say.”

Now with this entire tutorial of sorts being explained to you by me, please allow me to give you an analogy of what is REALLY happening:

Brexit is nothing more than a package that was delivered to our collective door yesterday and still has to be unpacked, the instructions for assembly found, and then once it is put together in its totality can it even begin to be understood. 

From the initial pieces of Brexit we can see, however, is that it is nothing more than a “show” of sorts and is meant as a prelude to the even greater chaos to come—and remember this FACT: “Fourth Turnings never peter out. They intensify to a crescendo of turmoil, chaos, violence, war, and bloodshed. This Fourth Turning intensification just got turned up dramatically. It will eventually be turned up to 11.”

Also, and please don’t forget this, EVERY SINGLE mainstream news article and poll about Brexit were 100% wrong, just like they are about Donald Trump, and many other issues critical to your knowing, too—after all, and don’t forget this either, these mainstream news sources are nothing more than propaganda designed to tell you how to think and act, so they weren’t actually wrong, they just failed to influence you because you weren’t listening!

And if millions of people the world over are failing to listen to their “media masters”, who then are they listening to?

Well, and you know this already, that’s why you’re reading this!

And just ask yourself:  how important is it to you to ALWAYS the know the truth the 'elites' try to keep hidden from you?

http://www.whatdoesitmean.com/index2062.htm

Judge Jeanine Destroys Obama’s Reaction

Fox Nation Exclusive: 'You Are Not The King': Judge Jeanine Destroys Obama’s Reaction To SCOTUS Immigration Decision

 

 

Published June 25, 2016

 

 

Earlier today, President Obama reacted to the Supreme Court's decision to block his executive amnesty  actions.

Obama lamented the decision, claiming that "immigration should not scare us". "Immigration will keep us youthful and dynamic".

"Immigration will keep us poorer and weaker, replied Judge Jeanine Pirro in her rebuttal to the President's remarks. "Mr. President, have you looked at Europe lately? It's a mess!"

"This is not a dictatorship. You are not the king. You cannot decide what the laws are and you cannot decide to ignore the laws", said Pirro.

"It's about time you respected Americans, respected the law, respected the courts and stopped with this crazy 'I'm the King and I'm gonna let everybody in and America's gonna look different'."
 

Judge Jeannie Pirro reacts logically 

to Obama's last speech about immigrants

 
http://nation.foxnews.com/2016/06/23/you-are-not-king-judge-jeanine-destroys-obama-s-reaction-scotus-immigration-decision 

Restaurant sues Muslims for claiming discrimination

 

Allegation women asked to leave because wearing hijabs 'laughable'

Bob Unruh
June 24 2016

A trendy California restaurant targeted by Muslim women who claimed they were the subjects of discrimination now is countersuing the women, alleging their case is fraudulent.  The countersuit on behalf of Urth Caffe in Laguna Beach was filed by the American Freedom Law Center.

 

AFLC senior counsel David Yerushalmi said the lawsuit claiming religious discrimination “is a fraud and a hoax on the courts and the media.” “It is nothing short of an abuse of process to extort public apologies and other accommodations from my client, Urth Caffe,” he said.

 

WND reported the women had been asked to leave the restaurant after they refused to vacate a sought-after patio table after 45 minutes, as restaurant policy requires.
A customer, Sara Farsakh, had posted a video on Facebook charging she and her friends were discriminated against because they are Muslim. Later, the Los Angeles branch of the Council on American-Islamic Relations (CAIR) said it was investigating.

At the time, the Islamic advocacy organization acknowledged that the café posts a policy that patrons must relinquish their seats after 45 minutes at certain times. But CAIR claimed “the group inquired about the policy [and] were taken aback because the café was not busy.  There were plenty of seats available both inside and outside the restaurant and several patrons who had arrived before the group had not been asked to leave.”

CAIR argued “two different groups approached the Muslim patrons and informed them that they had arrived before them and had not been asked to leave.”  But restaurateur Shallom Berkman – whose clientele in Laguna Beach includes a significant percentage of Muslims and who is working with investors in Saudi Arabia on a restaurant there – told reporters he’s a Jew with a Muslim wife, and they consider themselves “a sign of world peace.”

He confirmed there were customers waiting and said the intent of the policy is to “make things fair and accommodate everyone who wants to enjoy Urth Caffé." He said the 12 women in the group were not asked to leave because they are Muslim.

ABC reported the women filed a discrimination lawsuit against the restaurant.  “I felt embarrassed, outraged and shocked by the discrimination my friends and I were subjected to. We committed no crime, we violated no policy. Our only offense to Urth Caffe was that we are a group of Muslim women that visibly stood out, tarnishing their image,” Farsahk claimed at the time.

The law center on Thursday posted a new statement, saying, “On June 22, 2016, the Urth Caffe in Laguna Beach responded to a fraudulent lawsuit filed by seven Muslim women claiming religious discrimination by countersuing the women and alleging abuse of process.”

Yerushalmi explained: “The Urth Caffe did not discriminate against the women who have filed this fraudulent lawsuit. The claim that these women were asked to leave the café because they were wearing hijabs is laughable. That night, as every Friday night, a large number of young people, including a majority of whom are Muslim and of Arab descent, make up the base of Urth Caffe’s customers. “Not surprisingly, many of these customers are women swearing hijabs. None of these other Muslim women was asked to leave. The women who now claim victim status were not asked to leave, but only to abide by the café’s policy to give up their high-demand outside patio table after 45 minutes to allow other customers, including those wearing hijabs, to enjoy the experience,” he said.

He said several key facts “demonstrate the contrived and abusive nature of the women’s claims.”  “First, one of two owners who manage the Urth Caffe is herself a Muslim woman. Jilla Berkman, a co-owner of the Urth Caffe with her husband, was the one who actually authorized the call to the police after the women now claiming victim-status were loud and abusive to the Urth Caffe employees and refused to give up their table per the stated policy. 

Second, the lead plaintiff in the frivolous lawsuit is Sara Farsakh, a college-age activist for Palestinian causes who self-promotes her involvement in radical organizations, at least one of which calls for the destruction of Israel. 

Third, the organization behind the scenes organizing this fraudulent lawsuit is CAIR, or the Counsel on American-Islamic Relations.”

AFLC co-founder Robert Muise added, “CAIR, currently named a terrorist organization by the UAE, was previously named as an unindicted co-conspirator and Muslim Brotherhood-Hamas front group by the FBI and the U.S. attorney’s office in the successful prosecution of a terrorist funding cell organization around one of the largest Muslim charities, the Holy Land Foundation.” (Note: a long drawn out much involved trial process of CAIR, headquartered in Richardson (Dallas area), Texas - and well known for its questionable financial activities and questionable leadership.)

The London Guardian turned the focus onto Yerushalmi, noting he was described by the Southern Poverty Law Center as an “anti-Muslim activist who is a leading proponent of the idea that the United States is threatened by the imposition of Muslim religious law, known as Shariah.”  However, critics have questioned SPLC’s credibility after it recently put retired neurosurgeon Dr. Ben Carson on its “hate” list. It retracted the slam against Carson shortly later.

But SPLC also was formally tied to domestic terror in a case several years ago in which a homosexual activist wanted to terrorize and kill Christians. The terrorist, Floyd Corkins, now is serving a long prison term for going to the Washington office of the Family Research Council with plans to kill as many people as he could. He succeeded only in wounding a security guard before he was disarmed. He explained to the FBI he picked FRC because SPLC had the group on its “hate” list, which was due to its biblical position on homosexuality.

When the women filed their complaints against Urth Caffe, there were social media threats against the facility.

The OC Weekly explained the 45-minute policy is publicly posted by the restaurant.  “During our busy rush times, if you have already been at a table for 45 minutes or longer, please share or give your table to someone who is waiting. If tables are available, you are certainly welcome to enjoy Urth for as long as you desire,” it states. 

The restaurant called police and had them ask the women to leave when they refused to comply with a manager’s request regarding the policy, multiple reports say.  But commentator Daniel Greenfield at Front Page Magazine jumped right to the point, headlining a commentary “Another Muslim ‘minor inconvenience hate’ hoax gets shot down.”  “Actual minorities have hate crimes. Muslims mainly seem to have minor inconveniences. Like the Muslim passenger who was supposedly refused a can of diet coke by the flight attendant… only because she was Muslim. Or the Muslim who allegedly suffered a dirty look. Or were asked to leave a coffee shop after 45 minutes of hogging a table,” he wrote.  “For some reason, this incredibly Islamophobic coffee shop let her and her friends order, sit and hang out for 45 minutes and then only asked them to leave after 45 minutes which is the policy,” he wrote. “I’m sure Obama will be commenting on this before long. Because tragic minor inconveniences of hate like this cannot and must not be tolerated. Muslims should receive special exemption from all normal rules, whether while flying or at restaurants. The failure to respect Muslim Privilege is itself discriminatory.”

In “Stop the Islamization of America: A Practical Guide to the Resistance,” renowned activist Pamela Geller provides the answer, offering proven, practical guidance on how freedom lovers can stop jihadist initiatives in local communities.

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/restaurant-sues-muslims-for-claiming-discrimination/#!
 

MORE ON THE HOLLYWOOD CIA PRODUCTION OF 'ORLANDO'

DOCTORS ARE FAKE AT "ORLANDO MASSACRE". SEE THE PROOF!

ANOTHER 'SANDY HOOK' SPOOF ON AMERICA

TO PROMOTE GUN CONFISCATION 

END OF THE EU? Germany warns FIVE more countries could leave Europe after Brexit

FIVE European countries may seek to follow Britain’s lead in leaving the EU in a Brexit domino effect, Germany has warned.

 

GETTY

German chancellor Angela Merkel

France, the Netherlands, Austria, Finland and Hungary could leave.
Front National leader Marine Le Pen has pledged to hold a French referendum if she emerges victorious in next year's presidential elections.
While for the past two months a Nexit has been on the cards after Dutch voters overwhelmingly rejected a Ukraine-European Union treaty
Details of Berlin's concerns were outlined in a finance ministry strategy document.
Angela Merkel's country faces having to pay an extra £2.44billion a year to the annual EU budget once Britain has left.
Fears for the future of the EU have prompted German government officials to propose that Britain is offered “constructive exit negotiations”.
The aim is of making the UK an “associated partner country” of the EU, according to German newspaper Die Welt today.

Brexit: What happens next

Fri, June 24, 2016

After yesterday's referendum, here is a look at what will happen immediately following the historic vote for Britain to leave the EU.

Play slideshow

GETTY

German chancellor Angela Merkel

Hungarian Prime Minister, Viktor Orban, warned that Europe needs to change its ways.
“Brussels must hear the voice of the people, this is the biggest lesson from this decision," he told public radio.
“But Europe is strong only if it can give answers to major issues such as immigration that would strengthen Europe itself and not weaken it. The EU failed to give these answers."

GETTY

Viktor Orban, Hungarian Prime Minister

Another critic of the EU, the leader of Poland's ruling party, said that the UK referendum result shows the need for reform of the EU.
“The conclusion is obvious. We need a new European treaty," said Jaroslaw Kaczynski, who heads the Law and Justice party.
“We need a positive reaction, and not persistent movement in the same direction, a direction which has led to crisis," he added.

REUTERS

Marine Le Pen, leader of Front National

There is no point beating about the bush: today is a watershed for Europe

German Chancellor Angela Merkel

Tensions are rising across the EU, with Denmark, France, Italy, the Netherlands, and Sweden all facing demands for referendums over Europe.
In a statement, German Chancellor Angela Merkel said: "There is no point beating about the bush: today is a watershed for Europe, it is a watershed for the European unification processes.

 

 http://www.express.co.uk/news/world/683224/END-OF-THE-EU-Germany-France-Austria-Hungary-Finland-Netherlands-Europe-Brexit

Based on last night's vote for Britain to leave the European Union

Based on last night's vote for Britain to leave the European Union, Britain has begun it's own escape from the New World Order, giving hope to the rest of the world!

In a nutshell, the European Union was a plan by NWO to pull all of Europe into one single net, to take away each individual country's sovereignty, so that the NWO could capture them all at once. The NWO could then pick up the two biggest Western economies at once: the United States and all of Europe. But now that has all failed! It begins the end for the Global Economy, the takeover by corporations and the end of a One World Government.

Understand one thing here, that the European Union has a parliament, but that parliament has no authority to pass legislation. The real controller of the European Union is an unelected council above the parliament, thus a Cabal!

My fear was that the vote was going to be rigged by the Cabal the same as the Scottish vote to leave was rigged. This would foretell that the U.S. Presidential vote was a certain rigging as well. But now there is hope for us in America. I also believe that this will awaken more Americans as to what has happened to our democracies by the Cabal's takeover of them. I am also pleased that Donald Trump was there to seize the day for his America back home. I say “seize the day” but I really mean seize the moment from Hillary, who truly represents that Cabal.

Now the only fly in the ointment is that Britain's Parliament must formerly vote to leave the union. We have seen all along how politicians everywhere in democracies have been bought off so that action is still up for grabs, so to say. But so too are guillotines.

Criminal  charges  eyed  in  trade  of  baby  body  parts

 

Congressional  panel  to  attorney   general:  "We  found  serious  violations  of  law."

Bob Unruh

June 24 2016 

 

 

A special congressional panel has referred the University of New Mexico and an abortion business nearby for criminal investigation and possible charges following a review triggered by last year’s release of undercover videos investigating Planned Parenthood’s baby body-parts trade.

Rep. Marsha Blackburn, R-Tenn., chairwoman of the House Select Investigative Panel assigned to investigate abortion providers’ medical practices, on Thursday wrote to New Mexico Attorney General Hector Baldera Jr.

The document, nearly 300 pages long, includes evidence the panel discovered regarding the body-parts trade and more involving the school and the Southwestern Women’s Options abortion business located less than a mile away.

The evidence suggests, according to Blackburn’s letter, there were “transfers of value to SWWO from UNM” in the context of “aggressive abortion advocacy.” And the congressional panel is asking for “swift attention to the serious and systematic violations of law committed by the University of New Mexico and Southwestern Women’s Options.”

For example, the letter explained, the panel’s evidence reveals “that the transfer of fetal tissue from SWWO to UNM for research purposes is a systematic violation of New Mexico’s Jonathan Spradling Revised Uniform Anatomical Gift Act. “These violations occurred as UNM personnel procured fetal tissue from patients at SWWO for research by UNM entities.”

The report calls for the state investigation because the abortionists are citing the state’s Spradling law as authorization for the donation of fetal tissue, but that law actually bans the donation of aborted infants.  “All anatomical gifts made in New Mexico must comply with the Spradling Act, and the Act prohibits the provision of aborted infants and their parts as anatomical gifts.  

Based on the information obtained and reviewed … SWWO’s provision of tissue from aborted infants, and reception and use of the tissue by UNMHSC, arguably violates the Spradling Act,” the investigation found.

WND reported when Blackburn asked the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services for an investigation into body-parts transactions that appear to have violated federal privacy law.  “The panel’s investigation has uncovered information indicating that StemExpress and Planned Parenthood Mar Monte (‘PPMM’), Planned Parenthood Shasta Pacific (‘PPSP’), and Family Planning Specialists Medical Group (‘FPS’) (hereinafter ‘the abortion clinics’) committed systematic violations of the Health Insurance Portability and Accountability Act of 1996 (‘HIPAA’) privacy rule from about 2010 to 2015,” she wrote to federal regulators.

“These violations occurred when the abortion clinics disclosed patients’ individually identifiable health information to StemExpress to facilitate the “TPB’s efforts to procure human fetal tissue for resale.”

Her letter was sent to Jocelyn Samuels of the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services as well the HHS Office for Human Research Protections.

The investigation followed a series of revelations from undercover videos in 2015 released by the Center for Medical Progress. The videos revealed Planned Parenthood officials negotiating for the highest prices they could get for the body parts of dead babies. Companies that buy those parts and resell them at a profit to researchers also were caught in the undercover videos.

The letters from Blackburn explained how evidence obtained by her committee showed workers from StemExpress were allowed to get individually identifiable health information and protected health information about women seeking abortions at Planned Parenthood businesses, even though by law they should not have been given access.  “The work sequence, when combined with supporting documentation, reveals that StemExpress did not have a medically valid reason to see, and the abortion clinics did not have a reason to provide, patients’ PHI. Instead, the abortion clinics shared patients’ PHI with StemExpress in furtherance of contractual agreements that financially benefitted StemExpress and the clinics,” she wrote.

The new letter to the New Mexico attorney general drew an immediate reaction from Operation Rescue, whose president, Troy Newman, is on the board of the Center for Medical Progress. “This recommendation of criminal charges against UNM and Southwestern Women’s Options is the fruit of years of research and hard work done by a tenacious community of pro-life activists,” he said. “Seeing the fruit of that labor makes this a great day for us. All that’s left now is for law enforcement to read them their rights and take them away!”

OR reports it worked extensively in New Mexico with activists Bud and Tara Shaver of ProtestABQ to expose and oppose Southwestern Women’s Options, which is the “largest late-term abortion facility in the U.S., committing abortions throughout all nine months of pregnancy.”

Blackburn’s committee now has noted the “symbiotic relationship” between the school and the abortion business, in which the school provided benefits of value to the abortion business, which was supplying fetal tissue for its research work.

“It was Tara Shaver that first uncovered SWWO’s participation in supplying aborted baby tissue after she obtained an abortion consent form that buried brief tissue consent language near the bottom of a wordy form that required a patient signature before abortions could be performed,” OR explained. “This raised questions about whether women actually understood that their aborted baby’s remains would be used for ‘research.’ That consent form was modified after Shaver made the initial, illegal form public.”

Newman said: “We hope that this very heavily documented recommendation from the House Select Panel will persuade Attorney General Banderas to act to enforce New Mexico laws and stop the illegal exploitation of aborted babies for ‘valuable consideration.’ “We also hope that he will put an end to UNM’s practice of using taxpayer funds as well as UNM students to push their political agenda of abortion expansion upon an unwilling community.”

The congressional panel explained how an “outside abortion advocacy foundation” paid money to UNM to “promote the expansion of abortion.”  Blackburn’s document also revealed that there were contracts calling for UNM to staff the abortion business which lack evidence they were reviewed by the university lawyer, or signed by one of those eligible to confirm contracts.

The most recent contract, she noted, was abruptly canceled after the videos were released and investigations were begun by the state legislature, the New Mexico Alliance for Life and a newspaper. “It is difficult to dispute that the timing of UNM’s decision was related to the various investigations. Although UNM officials denied that the investigations prompted the program termination and disputed that SWWO had benefited from the program, the … agreement explicitly stated that its ‘major goal’ was of benefit to SWWO – namely, to ‘give additional volume of 2nd trimester abortions’ at the clinic,” the research revealed.

It noted most of the doctors at SWWO have been given status as “voluntary faculty” at UNM. “Although as volunteers these SWWO physicians are not paid a salary by UNM, they do receive substantial benefits for their faculty status. For example, they receive ‘New Mexico Tort Claims professional liability insurance coverage provided to university employees’ that is ‘extended to provide for the duties and activities performed by the individual Volunteer Faculty members,’ provided that such activities were assigned to them by the department chairpersons and that no other insurance covers such activities,” the committee found.

Further, the abortionists benefited from university compensation, including health sciences center library access, credit union access, recreational center membership, discounts on tickets for athletic and other events, free access to university facilities, and special access to the university press and golf facilities.  (Wonder if there are golf facilities for these murderers in hell.)   The abortionists get the benefits without doing any teaching or providing “academic services” to UNM, and the school benefits from the “fetal tissue” provided by the abortionists.

“The tissue transferred from SWWO to UNM is of substantial value,” the committee found, and the school even forwards tissue to other researchers outside of the state.  Blackburn explained to Balderas that federal law forbids the transfer of fetal tissue for profit.

Latest Planned Parenthood video

Horror........

Aborted baby moves arms, legs outside womb

Deborah Nucatola of Planned Parenthood commented on crushing babies:  “We’ve been very good at getting heart, lung, liver, because we know that, so I’m not gonna crush that part. I’m gonna basically crush below.  I’m gonna crush above, and I’m gonna see if I can get it all intact,” she said.

 

http://www.wnd.com/2016/06/criminal-charges-eyed-in-trade-of-baby-body-parts/#!

 

Read the tested and proven strategies to defeat the abortion cartel, in “Abortion Free: Your Manual for Building a Pro-Life America One Community at a Time.”