SEDITION! HIGH TREASON! JUDAS GOAT!

 HOW CAN A 'MAN' BE SOOOOOOO STUPID!!!

 

Have you yet seen this idiot on TV? Or read any of the reports? Of Keith Olbermann calling on all foreign governments to overthrow President Trump?  This idiot claims Americans are 'victims of a coup"?!

 

Olbermann has committed a MAJOR FELONY!  

https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/18/2385

1. U.S. Code › Title 18 › Part I › Chapter 115 › § 2385

18 U.S. Code § 2385 - Advocating overthrow of Government

Current through Pub. L. 114-38. (See Public Laws for the current Congress.)

·        US Code

·        Notes

prev | next

§ 2385.

Advocating overthrow of Government

Whoever knowingly or willfully advocates, abets, advises, or teaches the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying the government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or Possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein, by force or violence, or by the assassination of any officer of any such government; or

Whoever, with intent to cause the overthrow or destruction of any such government, prints, publishes, edits, issues, circulates, sells, distributes, or publicly displays any written or printed matter advocating, advising, or teaching the duty, necessity, desirability, or propriety of overthrowing or destroying any government in the United States by force or violence, or attempts to do so; or

Whoever organizes or helps or attempts to organize any society, group, or assembly of persons who teach, advocate, or encourage the overthrow or destruction of any such government by force or violence; or becomes or is a member of, or affiliates with, any such society, group, or assembly of persons, knowing the purposes thereof—

Shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

If two or more persons conspire to commit any offense named in this section, each shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than twenty years, or both, and shall be ineligible for employment by the United States or any department or agency thereof, for the five years next following his conviction.

As used in this section, the terms “organizes” and “organize”, with respect to any society, group, or assembly of persons, include the recruiting of new members, the forming of new units, and the regrouping or expansion of existing clubs, classes, and other units of such society, group, or assembly of persons.

(June 25, 1948, ch. 645, 62 Stat. 808; July 24, 1956, ch. 678, § 2, 70 Stat. 623; Pub. L. 87–486, June 19, 1962, 76 Stat. 103; Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(N), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2148.)

Historical and Revision Notes

Based on title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., §§ 10, 11, 13 (June 28, 1940, ch. 439, title I, §§ 2, 3, 5, 54 Stat. 670, 671).

Section consolidates sections 10, 11, and 13 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed. Section 13 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which contained the punishment provisions applicable to sections 10 and 11 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., was combined with section 11 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., and added to this section.

In first paragraph, words “the Government of the United States or the government of any State, Territory, District or possession thereof, or the government of any political subdivision therein” were substituted for “any government in the United States”.

In second and third paragraphs, word “such” was inserted after “any” and before “government”, and words “in the United States” which followed “government” were omitted.

In view of these changes, the provisions of subsection (b) of section 10 of title 18, U.S.C., 1940 ed., which defined the term “government in the United States” were omitted as unnecessary.

Reference to conspiracy to commit any of the prohibited acts was omitted as covered by the general conspiracy provision, incorporated in section 371 of this title. (See reviser’s note under that section.)

Words “upon conviction thereof” which preceded “be fined” were omitted as surplusage, as punishment cannot be imposed until a conviction is secured.

The phraseology was considerably changed to effect consolidation but without any change of substance.

Amendments

1994—Pub. L. 103–322 substituted “fined under this title” for “fined not more than $20,000” in fourth and fifth pars.

1962—Pub. L. 87–486 defined the terms “organizes” and “organize”.

1956—Act July 24, 1956, substituted “$20,000” for “$10,000”, and “twenty years” for “ten years” in the paragraph prescribing penalties applicable to advocating overthrow of government and inserted provisions relating to conspiracy to commit any offense named in this section.

Effective Date of 1956 Amendment

Amendment by act July 24, 1956, as applicable only with respect to offenses committed on and after July 24, 1956, see section 3 of act July 24, 1956, set out as a note under section 2384 of this title 

 

Clearly Olbermann is either a hopeless total ignoramus, a mental case who should be on prozac or locked up, a judas goat, and/or a servant of satan - or all three!  WHO is paying this asshole to put out all this nonsense?  And WHY is this creep not yet arrested and sitting in a gray bar hotel dressed in an orange jail suit on a strict diet of bread and water, awaiting trial for TREASON?  

 

The 'obamacare' bill was FORCED through CON-gress by Nancy Pelosi WITHOUT being read FIRST.  NO-ONE KNEW WHAT THEY HAD VOTED ON.  They just took  Pelosi's word that it should be passed ASAP. Clearly this jerk has NOT researched 'obamacare'.  IF he HAD, HE WOULD KNOW that this 'healthcare' program does anything BUT provide healthcare.  http://www.cnsnews.com/news/article/justices-ask-attorneys-what-were-supposed-read-thing

 

That bill was packed with plans to destroy this nation and her people.  Olbermann continually opens his big mouth,  demonstrating what an idiot and how UNINFORMED he is. 

 

 

 

Watch below.

 

Keith Olbermann Commits High Treason!

Calls For Foreign Gov'ts To Overthrow U.S. !!!!

 

 

Keith Olbermann has apparently completely lost his mind, now calling for foreign governments to overthrow the United States government and our lawfully elected President Donald Trump.

 

 

Attorney General Jeff Sessions - please have the Department of Justice pursue this idiot - and NOW!  Charge and hold Olbermann under The Patriot Act and the NDAA for TREASON!  Make a GOOD EXAMPLE of him to get the message across to the other BIG MOUTH leftist idiots that America has made her voice known loud and clear. 

 

Olbermann, your cohorts have destroyed our nation under your traitorous former 'presidents' of a crime syndicate 'government.'  We don't want you nor any of your cohorts in control over our nation any more! You are done done done.  

Trump!  Trump!  Trump!  Trump! 

Children Go Missing Every Year

Why Hundreds of Thousands Of Children 

Go Missing Every Year

David Icke

George H W Bush EXPOSED

George H W Bush 

EXPOSED

David Icke

Damning Podesta evidene unsealed - Pizzagate!

BREAKING!

DAMNING PODESTA EVIDENCE UNSEALED

PIZZAGATE!

WHAT'S AN 'INFIDEL'?

WHAT'S AN 'INFIDEL'?

 

The author, Rick Mathes, is a well-known leader in prison ministry. The man who walks with God always gets to his destination. If you have a pulse, you have a purpose.

 

The Muslim religion is the fastest growing religion per capita in the U S, especially in the minority races - not the Catholics, not
the Mormons.  Last month I attended my annual training session that's required for maintaining my state prison security clearance. During the training session there was a presentation by 3 speakers representing the Roman Catholic, Protestant & Muslim faiths who each explained their beliefs.

 

I was particularly interested in what the Islamic Imam had to say. The Muslim gave a great presentation of the basics of Islam, complete with a video.

 

After the presentations, time was provided for questions and answers. When it was my turn, I directed my question to the Muslim and asked: 'Please, correct me if I'm wrong, but I understand that most Imams and clerics of Islam have declared a 'holy jihad' [Holy war] against the 'infidels' of the world and that, by killing an 'infidel', (which is a command to all Muslims) they are assured of a place in heaven. If that's the case, can you give me the definition of an 'infidel'?'

 

There was no disagreement with my statements and, without hesitation, he replied, " Non-believers".

 

I responded, 'So, let me make sure I have this straight. All followers of Allah have been commanded to kill everyone who is not of your faith so they can have a place in heaven. Is that correct?'

 

The expression on his face changed from one of authority and  command to that of a little boy who had just been caught with his hand in the cookie jar.'

 

He sheepishly replied ….. "Yes"

 

I then stated, 'Well, sir, I have a real problem trying to imagine the Pope commanding all Catholics to kill those of your faith or Dr. Stanley ordering all Protestants to do the same in order to guarantee them a place in heaven!'

 

The Muslim was speechless.

 

I continued, 'I also have a problem with being your friend when you and your brother clerics are telling your followers to kill me! 

 

Let me ask you another a question:

 

Would you rather have your Allah, who tells you to kill me in order for you to go to heaven, or my Jesus who tells me to love you because I am going to heaven and He wants you to be there with me?'

 

You could have heard a pin drop.   

 

Needless to say, the organizers and promoters of the 'Diversification' training seminar were not happy with my way of dealing with the Islamic Imam and exposing the truth about the Muslims' beliefs.

 

In 20 years there will be enough Muslim voters in the U.S. to elect the President! 

 

I think everyone in the U.S. should be required to read this but, with the ACLU, there is no way this will be widely publicized unless each of us sends it on!  

 

This is your chance to make a difference.

FOR GOD'S SAKE...SEND THIS ON!

 

To The Generals — Get the Lead Out

 

To The Generals — Get the Lead Out

From Anna Von Reitz
June 27 2017




Without putting too sharp of a point on it, gentlemen, every day that you chase your tails little old ladies are being evicted from their homes under false pretenses, children in America (and elsewhere) are going without food for no good reason, and criminals continue to reign supreme in our courthouses, imposing foreign law and working every possible infamous fraud scheme to rob, impersonate, and press gang Americans that you are morally, lawfully, and in front of the entire world contractually obligated to protect and defend.  

No functionary agent acting as the President of the United States has any power or ability to interfere with our execution of private domestic policy in behalf of the actual people of this country.  Read the actual Constitution.  All powers, including the delegated powers, ultimately remain on our hands.  

The UNITED STATES is in Chapter 7 involuntary bankruptcy and is being liquidated.  The USA is in Chapter 11.  We have international bankruptcy "Trustees" named by Secondary Creditors swarming in on us--- the Paramount Security Interest Holders---- and there you all sit, like great lumps of fat, "discussing the situation".  

There is nothing to discuss.  You know your duty, or you certainly ought to.  

The American people have been mis-characterized as "citizens", conscripted, deported, kidnapped, and press-ganged into the service of two foreign commercial corporations, one British, one French, which are merely in the business of providing "essential governmental services" on a for-hire basis ----and generally doing a piss poor job of it, too.  

Our states and people have been bankrupted via a process of false presumption and debt assumption once, back in the 1930's, and now the perpetrators are trying to do it again, only this time they propose to steal the whole show--- trying to seize of the land and the land assets that actually belong to the Priority Creditors of the UNITED STATES and the USA, both. 

And who are the Priority Creditors of both the UNITED STATES and the USA?  We are. The American states and people. 

This is not a private nor a contractual matter. This is organized crime and racketeering on a multi-national scale.  It is your responsibility, together with the responsibility of INTERPOL and all the other law enforcement agencies to crack down and get control of these renegade corporations and hold their executives feet first to the fire, beginning with the American Bar Association.

We recently forwarded the black and white evidence of a vast criminal conspiracy fronted by the then-USAG (INTERPOL) in 2007 operating the Office of the United States Attorney General and Wells Fargo Bank, both, to defraud the actual land jurisdiction counties --- all 3100 of them --- and the American people out of their land and homes and businesses.  The entire debacle of 2008 and the current massive Foreclosure Mill Fraud, has been directly caused by members of the USDOJ and the American Bar Association acting in criminal collusion and conspiracy with international banks. 

In essence, they foreclose on "JOHN MICHAEL DOE" (a fraudulently created UNITED STATES corporate franchise) with one hand and use the equity credit  merely "presumed" to belong to  "John Michael Doe" (a fraudulently created Territorial USA franchise)  to buy the property back for themselves---- leaving the living man who just happens to be the actual John Michael Doe, out on the street.

We want these criminals removed from all public buildings and permanently barred from holding or appearing to hold any public offices naturally belonging to the states and people of this country.  We want the international commercial lien which we have established against the ABA/IBA as a result of their criminal activities fully enforced. 

We want INTERPOL, the CIA, the DOJ, the FBI, the NSA, the IRS and every other alphabet soup agency directly or indirectly on our payroll to clean house from one end to the other, and if they do not get to the bottom of this when great-grandmothers and garage owners have been able to do so--- consider them all fired.  Permanently.  Not eligible for rehire. 

As for you, you have worked for us indirectly, now you can work for us directly. We have the resources available to pay for your services with no need to kiss any off-shore rump.  Our arrangements with the Native Americans to provide the essential governmental services as federal contractors are more than sufficient to preserve the actual Constitution despite the self-evident Breach of Trust and Neglect of Duty and Default of both the French and British Governments in these matters.  

You will give your immediate and urgent attention to the job of securing all American assets on a worldwide basis, including securing the names, copyrights, trademarks, bank accounts, DNA, and all other purloined assets of the American states and people which have been stolen----and returning all such property to the rightful owners.   

You will also give your immediate and urgent attention to preventing further international identity theft and false commercial enfranchisement practices. 

James Clinton Belcher, Head of State, United States of America

Anna Maria Riezinger, Judge, World Trust Fiduciary

https://mainerepublicemailalert.com/2017/06/27/to-the-generals-get-the-lead-out/ 

Sarah Palin Hires Hulk Hogan's Legal Team to Sue the New York Times for Defamation

by Tony Lee27 Jun 201724

On Tuesday evening, former Alaska Governor Sarah Palin hired Hulk Hogan’s lawyers and sued the New York Times for defamation for falsely accusing her in a June 14 editorial of inciting Jared Lee Loughner to shoot Rep. Gabby Giffords (D-AZ). The Times’ editorial was published on the day that James Hodgkinson shot House Majority Whip Steve Scalise (R-LA) while he was practicing for the Congressional Baseball Game with his GOP teammates.

“Today, Sarah Palin took a stand against The New York Times Company by filing a lawsuit which seeks to hold The Times accountable for stating that Governor Palin is part of a ‘sickeningly familiar pattern’ of politically motivated violence and that she incited the horrific 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords, a tragedy where the gunman seriously wounded numerous people and killed 6, including a federal judge and a 9-year-old girl,” Palin’s lawyers—Ken Turkel, Shane Vogt, and S. Preston Ricardo—said in a statement.
The complaint, filed in Manhattan federal court, states that “at the time of publication, The Times knew and had published pieces acknowledging that there was no connection between Mrs. Palin and Loughner’s 2011 shooting.”
“In doing so, The Times violated the law and its own policies,” it reads.
Messrs. Turkel, Vogt, and Ricardo said Palin “seeks to hold The Times to its November 13, 2016, pledge [‘to rededicate itself to reporting facts honestly and holding power to account’], and to face both journalistic and financial accountability for the false statements that it published about Mrs. Palin.”
As Breitbart News previously noted, Palin indicated on Twitter that she was “considering suing the New York Times for libel” the day after the Times published its editorial even though “it has long been established that there has never been any evidence whatsoever linking Palin to the attempted assassination.”

(1/2) @nytopinion – commonsense suggestion by a journalist, am talking to attorneys this AM and exploring options. BTW, wonder.. pic.twitter.com/jACvxwUBZH

— Sarah Palin (@SarahPalinUSA) June 15, 2017

(2/2) …WHY someone would no longer be in public eye? Think constant libel & slander have anything to do with it?

— Sarah Palin (@SarahPalinUSA) June 15, 2017

Here is what the Times originally wrote in its editorial:

Was this attack evidence of how vicious American politics has become? Probably. In 2011, when Jared Lee Loughner opened fire in a supermarket parking lot, grievously wounding Representative Gabby Giffords and killing six people, including a 9-year-old girl, the link to political incitement was clear. Before the shooting, Sarah Palin’s political action committee circulated a map of targeted electoral districts that put Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs.

The Times, after much public backlash from even Palin’s harshest critics on the left and right, then issued two subsequent corrections.
After adding that “no connection to the shooting was ever established” to its original editorial, the Times issued this correction on June 15:

An earlier version of this editorial incorrectly stated that a link existed between political incitement and the 2011 shooting of Representative Gabby Giffords. In fact, no such link was established.

But the Times never corrected that it had falsely stated that Palin had put “Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs” when Palin did no such thing.
Later in the day on June 15, the Times edited its editorial again to note that Palin’s map “showed the targeted electoral districts of Ms. Giffords and 19 other Democrats under stylized cross hairs.”
It then issued its second correction:

The editorial also incorrectly described a map distributed by a political action committee before that shooting. It depicted electoral districts, not individual Democratic lawmakers, beneath stylized cross hairs.

Yet, in a statement to CNN, the Times insisted that their errors did not “undercut or weaken the argument of the piece.”
Palin’s lawyers pointed out that “despite recognizing that its statements about Mrs. Palin in the June 14, 2017 column ‘America’s Lethal Politics’ are not true, The Times repeatedly failed to meaningfully retract or correct its column and apologize to Mrs. Palin for publishing it. Rather, The Times issued a statement affirming that its ‘error doesn’t undercut or weaken the argument of the piece.’”
To prove that the Times had “ample facts available that established that there was no connection between Mrs. Palin and Loughner’s crime,” the lawyers point to an article the Times published on January 15, 2011, that “recognized that no direct or clear link between political rhetoric and Loughner’s actions could be claimed.” In addition, the lawyers point out that New York Times columnist Charles Blow once wrote that “the only problem is that there was no evidence then, and even now, that overheated rhetoric from the right had anything to do with the shooting” of Giffords.
The lawyers also refer to Blow’s column, “She Who Must Not Be Named,” that was critical of the left’s and the establishment press’s continued coverage of Palin. In Blow’s column, he asks, “What purpose does it serve other than inflaming passions to drive viewership and Web clicks?”
The complaint points out that Blow’s “column acknowledges that there is existing hostility held toward Mrs. Palin, and also recognizes that her name and attacks upon her inflame passions and thereby drive viewership and Web clicks to media companies.”
“The Times published the Palin Article with actual knowledge that stories attacking Mrs. Palin inflame passions, which drives viewership and Web clicks,” the complaint further reads. “Thus, The Times knowingly and voluntarily exploited and retained a benefit conferred by Mrs. Palin, in special circumstances particular to this case in which it would be inequitable for The Times to retain that benefit without paying the value thereof to Mrs. Palin.”
Palin’s attorneys argue that the Times’ “conduct was committed knowingly, intentionally, willfully, wantonly and maliciously, with the intent to harm Mrs. Palin, or in blatant disregard of the substantial likelihood of causing her harm, thereby entitling Mrs. Palin to an award of punitive damages.”
Two of Palin’s lawyers–Messrs. Turkel and Vogt–successfully represented Hulk Hogan in his $140 million invasion of privacy suit against Gawker after Gawker published Hogan’s sex tape. As noted on the firm’s website, they “convinced a Pinellas County jury to award Terry Bollea, professionally known as Hulk Hogan, $55 million in economic damages and another $60 million in damages for emotional distress. The jury awarded an additional $25.1 million in punitive damages, making the verdict one of the largest contested verdicts in Pinellas County history.”

01 – Complaint W-o Exhibits (00125593xBEB76) by Breitbart News on Scribd