JUST IN: HOMELAND SECURITY ISSUES CHILLING WARNING

JUST IN: HOMELAND SECURITY ISSUES CHILLING WARNING


August 12 2017
Adam Selene

North Korea is making wild threats and testing new missile capabilities, and Homeland Security felt they had to respond.

Guam’s Homeland Security Office of Civil Defense has published a reference sheet which instructs citizens what to do in case of a nuclear strike, as per The Hill.

The days of pretending everything is fine in North Korea are long over. Guam is taking practical and important steps to ensuring its citizens safety.

Kim Jon-un threatened us and claimed his country would have a plan to launch missles near the island of Guam by mid-August. Though this isn’t a threat of a direct nuclear attack, the rising tension is leading to fears that the North Korean dictator might be foolish enough to try to attack Guam.

In response to this latest threat, President Donald Trump said, “He has been very threatening beyond a normal state and as I said they will be met with fire, fury and frankly power the likes of which this world has never seen before.”

While it’s hard to be certain if North Korea actually has the capacity to launch an attack of this magnitude, it’s better to be prepared. From our military’s perspective, that means being prepared to strike back at a moment’s notice. From the citizen’s perspective, that means having a personal safety plan.

That’s clearly the perspective Guam has taken, who are advising citizens to plan ahead by creating an emergency kit and to make a list of the concrete shelters near them, according to the full sheet published by CNN.

If anyone is stuck outside during the blast, Guam officials caution them not to look at the blast, to take any kind of shelter available, and to cover their head.

The emergency fact sheet also details what to do after a potential nuclear strike occurs. Citizens who were outside should try to get clean as soon as possible by removing their clothes and washing with lots of soap, while avoiding scrubbing or rubbing the skin. It’s a bad idea to use conditioner, as it binds with radioactive material.

Guam Governor Eddie Calvo has, above all, cautioned calm to the people of Guam according to Reuters. He’s also cautioned North Korea, “Though I don’t want the temperature to get any higher, I think it’s important also that there is clarity and that if there is an attack on any American soil including Guam, that it will be met with overwhelming response.”

During a nuclear blast, concrete is thick enough to block nuclear radiation. Citizens are warned that they would have to stay inside for at least 24 hours, as the more time has passed, the less radiation they’ll find outside. 

Governor Calvo is exactly right and, in the end, the certainty of an American response to an attack on Guam is likely what will prevent the North Korean dictator from following through with his threats.

Let’s pray that the North Korean dictator is not foolish enough to actually attack anyone. He may bolster and brag in front of his poor citizens, but he must be interested in self-preservation above all else.

https://www.christiannewsalerts.com/homeland-security-issues-chilling-warning/?utm_source=Boomtrain&utm_medium=morning&utm_campaign=20170813-1

Breakfast anyone?

SUNDAY MORNING

BREAKFAST ANYONE!!!!

To my friends who wished me a happy birthday ................

To all my friends who wished me a Happy Birthday!

A special message!

Life is too stressful, too serious right now

Lighten up!!!!!

 

You are special

and I appreciate you!

hahahaha

 Hope you don't mind my attempts at humor!

To my friends who visit the blog ......a funny for you!

The guy is NOT me!

But you get the message!

Just put a blond wig on him with shoulder length hair,

high heels, a skirt/dress and **bingo**!

haha 

And I am NOT transgender!

Geezz! Should I publish this one?!  

hahahaha

CIA Agent Confesses On Deathbed: ‘We Blew Up WTC7 On 9 11’

NEW DEMONSTRATION COURT PROJECT Notes

PLEASE TAKE CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE!!!

What you are looking at here is just a brief overview of the NEW DEMONSTRATION COURT PROJECT, which started approximately around 1995 and progressed through 1998-99 to implementation around 1998-99 to this very day. Now this looks like a real smooth plan to try and improve the Judicial Court System of this UNITED STATES and THE state of Michigan and it is, but you also need to realize that a lot of the topics of streamlining the Court System is also about shutting down you Patriot Type Pro Se Litigants totally and denying to you your just and Lawful Day in Court to present your Case in Chief like was described in the Supreme Court Case HAINES vs. KERNER, 404 U.S. 519, which Case held that I coud NOT BE HELD TO THE SAME STRINGENT STANDARDS OF AN ATTORNEY LONG SCHOOLED IN THE ART AND PRACTICE OF LAW, and THAT IF THEY COULD READ MY PAPERS, BRIEFS, MOTIONS, etc. and UNDERSTAND THE SIMPLIFIED SYNTEX OR WRITING STYLE USING COMMON SENSE , THAT MY PLEADINGS AND BRIEFS HAD TO BE ACCEPTED JUST LIKE ANY OTHER ATTORNEY LONG SCHOOLED IN THE ART AND PRACTICE OF LAW. FURTHER THIS CASE HELD THAT HEY THE TEST IS NOT WHETHER I WIN OR LOOSE THE CASE, BECAUSE I MAY LOOSE, BUT THE REAL TEST IS WHETHER I GOT AN OPPORTUNITY TO BE HEARD BEFORE THE COURT AND PRESENT MY CASE IN IT'S ENTIRETY, OR CASE IN CHIEF IS THE LEGAL TERM, THAT THIS WAS THE REAL TEST AND IF I DID NOT GET MY HONEST CHANCE TO BE HEARD IN TOTAL ON MY CASE IN CHIEF THE COURT HAD TO DO THE WHOLE CASE OVER DE NOVO, AS I WAS CLEARLY DENIED DUE PROCESS OF LAW IN VIOLATION OF TITLE 5 U.S. CODE SECTIONS #557 AND #706, WHICH IS A BLATENT DENIAL OF BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS VOIDING ANY JUDGMENT OF THIS COURT!!

Now let us cut to the chase here!! THIS PROJECT YOU ARE LOOKING AT CONSUMES SOME TENS OF THOUSANDS OF PAGES TAKING UP OVER TWO (2) COMPLETE COMPUTER DISK FILES AMOUNTING TO SOME 2.76 MEGA BITES OF COMPUTER DATA AND THAT IS THE SHORT VERSION JUST FOR EXPLANATION PURPOSES, GOT ME!!!!! THIS IS PRIMAE FACIA EVIDENCE, PURE FACT, THAT YOUR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS HAVE BEEN VIOLATED BY A CONSPIRACY TO MAKE SURE YOU PRO SE LITIGANT, ie. NON-ATTORNEY TYPES NEVER GET YOUR DAY IN COURT.....GOT IT????????? NOW THE SMART ONES WILL GO GET AN ATTORNEY, IMMEDIATELY BEFORE IT IS TOO LATE, BECAUSE IF YOU DON'T GET A REAL LICENSED ATTORNEY YOU WILL LOOSE FOR SURE, AND THAT IS WHAT THIS PROJECT IS REALLY ABOUT, TO PROTECT AND PRESERVE THE LAWYER/ JUDGE COMMUNITY'S LITTLE PROFESSIONAL FRAUD SCAM JOB CATAGORY, BECAUSE IT'S ABOUT THEIR INDIVIDUAL PROFESSIONAL SURVIVAL AS A CLASS, AND THEY HAVE MADE UP THEIR MINDS BY GOD THEY WILL SURVIVE, GOT ME!!!??

NOW IT HAS TAKEN SERIOUS CONSIDERABLE TIME, MONIES, RESOURCES, AND SERIOUS BUTT BUSTING WORK DOWN IN THE LAW LIBRARIES AND COURTS TO FIND AND RESEARCH/ STUDY ALL THIS VERY CLEVER PROJECT TO DENY THE LITTLE PEOPLE THEIR DAY IN COURT UNLESS THEY HIRE AN ATTORNEY/ LAWYER!!! PLEASE DO RESPECT THIS INFORMATION, BECAUSE WE INTEND TO USE IT FLIPPED BACK ON THE BAD GUYS AS PROOF OF CONSPIRACY TO VIOLATE OUR BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, AND LOOK AT THE LENGTHS THEY WENT TO TO BLOCK US LITTLE PEOPLE GETTING OUR DAY IN COURT!!!! BINGO, YOU GOT IT, WE ARE COMING BACK WITH A ROAR!!! FOR NOW, JUST STUDY THIS DATA AND KNOW TOO, THIS IS JUST A TIP OF THE ICE BERG AND IT TOOK YEARS AND YEARS TO IMPLEMENT!!! WE WERE NEVER EVER_SUPPOSE TO HAVE ACCESS TO THIS MATERIAL!! PLEASE PROTECT IT, AND DON'T GIVE IT TO ANY UNSKILLED OR UNSCROPULOUS PEOPLE, WHO DON'T REALLY CARE ABOUT FIXING OUR COURT SYSTEM, BUT JUST WANT ATTENTION OR A CHANCE TO RAISE A LITTLE HELL, AND GET SOME ATTENTION, BECAUSE THEY WILL SCREW THIS IDEA UP BIG TIME AND THEN WE WILL HAVE TO GO THE LONG WAY TO OVERCOME THEIR SCREWUPS THE HARD WAY!!!! REMEMBER KNOWLEDGE IS POWER, AND CHANCE FAVORS THE PREPARED MIND!!! GET PREPARED!!!

BEST REGARDS!! 

 

YOUR GOOD FRIEND SAM!!

P.S. ALSO NOTE THOSE BROWN AND TAN ENVELOPES DOWN AT THE COURT CLERK'S DESK/ WINDOW, RESERVED FOR ATTORNEYS ONLY!! I ACCIDENTIALLY PICKED ONE UP AND TOOK IT HOME CONFUSED IN MY VOLUMINOUS PAPERS, AND MY GOD IT WAS ABOUT 1 AND 1/2 INCHES THICK BRIEFS AND RULES, ALL ADDRESSED PERSONALLY TO ALL ATTORNEYS, DIRECTING THOSE ATTORNEYS, VERY PRECISELY, AS TO WHAT WILL BE ACCEPTABLE ARGUMENTS BROUGHT BEFORE THE COURT, AND THAT SEVERE SANCTIONS WOULD BE CHARGED AGAINST ANY ATTORNEY OR LAW FIRM, WHO VIOLATED THIS MANDATE OF UNACCEPTABLE ARGUMENTS BROUGHT AGAINST THIS CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICE PACKAGE, AS FRIVOLOUS OR FRAUDULENT PLEADINGS, AND ESPECIALLY OF CLAIMS OF CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS IMAGINED OR OTHERWISE!! SO YOU HAVE A SERIOUS PROBLEM EVEN FINDING AN ATTORNEY WITH GUTS ENOUGH TO GO AGAINST THE COURT'S MANDATES AND CONSTRUCTIVE NOTICES GOT ME, TO EVEN TAKE YOUR SIDE, AND FURTHER KNOW THAT NO ATTORNEY IS GOING TO BLOW OUT HIS BAR LICENSE, OR LAW PRACTICE, WHICH TOOK HIM YEARS TO ESTABLISH AND BUILD UP JUST TO TAKE YOUR CASE TO COURT AND RISK SEVERE SANCTIONS FROM THE DISPLEASED JUDGES, WHO KNOWS CLEARLY, FOR SURE YOU MUST HAVE PICKED UP ONE OF THOSE PACKETTS MR. ATTORNEY, AND YOU WERE GIVEN FAIR WARNING HUH!!! NOW GO TRY AND FIND A LICENSED ATTORNEY WHO WILL ARGUE THE DRIVER'S LICENSE IS 100% UNCONSTITUTIONAL IN FACT, OR ANY SUCH CONSTITUTIONAL ARGUMENT, THE RIGHT TO KEEP AND BEAR ARMS etc. etc. !!! YOU HAVE GOT TO BE KIDDING RIGHT!!?????!! DO I LOOK LIKE I GOT STUPID WRITTEN ALL OVER MY FACE????!!! WHY I'd GET DISBARRED OR SANCTIONED OUT OF BUSINESS!! YOU SEE THIS IS THE PROBLEM AND THAT MEANS YOU ARE LOCKED INTO THE PRO SE LITIGANT STATUS AUTOMATICALLY WITHOUT ANY OTHER RECOURSE OR YOU MUST JUST GIVE UP, AND THE COURT DOES NOT EVEN WANT TO HEAR ANYTHING FROM YOU AT ALL, AND WILL DISALLOW EVERYTHING YOU SAY OR PLEAD IN THE state of Michigan!! YOU GOT THE PICTURE NOW???!! DOES THAT PRETTY MUCH CLEAR IT UP FOR YOU WHY WE HAVE HAD SUCH DIFFICULTIES, WHEN WE SHOULD HAVE WON HANDS DOWN NO QUESTION!!! NOW YOU GOT THE WHOLE PICTURE!!! THAT IS A DIRECT VIOLATION OF YOUR BASIC CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS, A FELONY FOR SURE!! SEE 18 U.S. Code SECTION 241 AND 242, ALSO SEE TITLE 42 U.S. Code SECTIONS 1983, 1985, AND 1986. IT IS A FELONY, $10.000.00 FINE AND (10) TEN YEARS IN JAIL GOT ME???!! ALRIGHT GET BUSY AND FIND A GOOD ATTORNEY AND SEE IF HE WILL AT LEAST SIT DOWN WITH YOU AND DISCUSS THE MATTER AND MAYBE STEER YOU INTO SOME HELPFUL POSITION OR DEFENSIVE GOOD POSTURE TO TRY AND GET YOUR DAY!!! GOOD LUCK!!! YOU OTHER ALTERNATIVE IS TO SUE IN FEDERAL COURT, MAYBE ALL THE WAY TO THE U.S. SUPREME COURT ON ORIGINAL JURISDICTION!!! BE READY FOR A REAL FIGHT IN ANY CASE!!

The Bundys--- Again

By Anna Von Reitz

Unfortunately, there are good guys and bad guys in every story and it is hard to always tell the difference.  

I started my active plan to get the government restored and my own butt out of the wringer back in 1998.  I had studied the issues and problems related to this for years prior to that, but like most people, I didn't immediately know what to do.  The information was so confusing and hard to mine out of the public documents..... 

I eventually discovered what Rod Class and others are now confirming via different routes and means--- that the federal government is just a couple giant corporations with "State of" franchises of each, and that our own actual government has gradually faded from view through lack of action and understanding of how responsible we are for self-government and how the various jurisdictions are meant to work. 

Anyway, a group of us figured out that the Holy See was behind the corporate government organizations and so, we brought our complaints to Rome back in 2008.  Pope Benedict XVI asked for help in bringing remedy to the problem and began taking immediate steps.  One of the things he asked help with was to give Notice to all the government employees so that they had a chance to correct their operations.  

We agreed, it was only fair to give them Notice.  So that is what I did "for" Pope Benedict and Pope Francis.  I have faithfully given notice to thousands of federal officials.  Nobody can complain and say we didn't give them fair Notice and opportunity to cure.  

Because we did this work of giving Notice, which was required of us by law and Due Process in any event, I have had all sorts of otherwise sane people accusing me of being "an agent of the Vatican" and totally misrepresenting the facts.  

Most people are so ignorant that they make no distinction between the Vatican (the property management company of the Holy See) and the Holy See and the Pope.  They just lump all these organizations and offices into one name "the Vatican" and they don't grasp the difference or the different roles of these vast networks and how they interact with each other, either.  It would be a better world if non-Catholics and Catholics alike took more interest in the way the Church is organized.  

I digress.  Anyway, the point is, I never received a pay check and I never worked "for" the Vatican.  I assisted in that I gave Notice for Pope Benedict to his employees AND also gave Notice separately in my own capacity at the same time.  

So what?  Didn't cost me much more and at least the Catholic federal employees stopped to look and listen and think when things came over their desks with the Pope's authority attached to it, and getting them to notice and understand what they are doing wrong was the whole point of it.  

This innocent and practical effort was turned into a Witch Hunt of major proportions, so that for a time, everything I said was being misreported and misunderstood by the American patriot groups---- most of whom also assumed that I was a Catholic. (I am a Lutheran since age seven, so, good luck with that Big, Fat Lie, too.)  

I have been told that this misrepresentation of me as a "Vatican agent" was the reason the Bundys and the others wouldn't listen to a word I said, but that did not keep me from telling them the Truth and giving them clear instructions on how to get themselves back into proper political status.  

Like millions of other Americans, they can't be helped if they won't listen.  Absent a miracle of jury conscience, they will be convicted in Nevada on technicalities and infringement of the copyright to their own names.

I guess the good news is that if and when the "horses" decide to drink they can always come back home and get these cases overturned on appeal.   The bad news is that they will probably lose their ranches and a  large part of their lives engaged in a struggle that shouldn't even exist, if they just got their public records straight and stood on them. 

Even though they haven't taken my good advice, I urge everyone to try to help the Bundys and the others with donations and with work.  Those who can should be helping the women work the ranches while their husbands are in jail.   And everyone can spread the Truth and help restore the lawful government we are all owed and keep the Bundys and others in their prayers.  

----------------------------

See this article and over 600 others on Anna's website here:www.annavonreitz.com

Changing our ways of expression

Monitoring words in comments for the BLOG ...........

I always have to laugh at folks trying to put a heavy harness on dignity or not, but it reminds me of Bess Truman.  

Someone asked her if she could train Harry not to use the word 'manure' in his speeches.  Bess replied, "You should have seen how long it took me to train him to use that word!"

Doesn't take much imagination to guess what word Truman must have been using that Bess worked so hard to get him to  use 'manure' instead!! 

 

China’s Trade Violations -- “They’re Ripping Us Off”

TRUMP TO CRACK DOWN ON CHINA'S TRADE VIOLATIONS - "THEY'RE RIPPING US OFF!"



August 12, 2017
Kirsty Jane  


On Monday, President Trump will begin cracking down on China’s alleged U.S. intellectual property rights violations and forced technology transfers

From The Gateway Pundit

POLITICO reports:

Trump on Monday will call for an investigation into China over allegations that the nation violated U.S. intellectual property rights and forced technology transfers, the official said.

While it’s unclear how much detail Trump will get into in the announcement, administration officials expect U.S. Trade Representative Robert Lighthizer to open an investigation against China under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974.

The pending announcement comes amid heightened tension between the United States and China, even after the Trump administration scored a victory in persuading Beijing to sign onto new United Nations sanctions on North Korea.

It is not clear whether China has the motivation to close off the spigot entirely with North Korea. China is North Korea’s main trading partner, and it is not interested in seeing the economic collapse of the regime, which could send a flood of refugees into China and destabilize its northern provinces.

The ordering of the investigation will not immediately impose sanctions but could lead to steep tariffs on Chinese goods. Trump has expressed frustration in recent months over what he sees as China’s unfair trade policies.

President Trump has been stating for quite some time that “China is ripping us off on trade.”

China recently warned the U.S. on striking North Korea first, signaling it would defend Pyongyang if President Trump launched pre-emptive strikes.

Zerohedge reports:

In a troubling repudiation of President Donald Trump’s demands that Beijing do more to rein in its bellicose neighbor, Beijing, through the state-owned media, cautioned the US president on Friday that it would intervene (militarily) on North Korea’s behalf if the US and South Korea launch a preemptive strike to “overthrow the North Korean regime,” according to a statement in the influential state-run newspaper Global Times.

“If the U.S. and South Korea carry out strikes and try to overthrow the North Korean regime and change the political pattern of the Korean Peninsula, China will prevent them from doing so,” it said.

At the same time, the Chinese regime made it clear that its preferred outcome would be a continuation of the status quo, warning Kim Jong Un that it would “remain neutral if North Korea were to strike first.” The article, cited by Rueters, reiterated calls for a diplomatic solution. However, the possibility of talks between the two sides was looking increasingly remote as both Trump and Kim continued to exchange threats of nuclear annihilation, with Trump clarifying Thursday that his earlier promise to respond with “fire and fury” should the North continue to threaten the US may not have gone far enough.

China – North Korea’s most important ally and trading partner – has reiterated calls for calm during the current crisis. Beijing has expressed frustration with both Pyongyang’s repeated nuclear and missile tests and with behavior from South Korea and the United States, such as military drills, that it sees as escalating tensions.

http://eheadlines.com/trump-to-crackdown-in-chinas-trade-violations-theyre-ripping-us-off/

Google 'Kill-Bot' Goes On A Murder Spree

Google 'Kill-Bot' Goes On A Murder Spree As SkyNet Starts Virtually Killing Hundreds 

By Susan Duclos

All News PipeLine

August 11, 2017

The Dark Side of any monopoly eventually makes itself known

As ANP readers proved conclusively in the comment section of a recent article titled "Google Labels Religious Beliefs 'Toxic' With Censorship AI Program," Google's AI technology is severely flawed due to the biases of the groups providing the information to "teach" the artificial intelligence how to rate the "toxicity" of a comment or phrase.

It appears now that the flaw, the biases, are being taught to all Google AI bots, across the board as their plans to go "full Nazi" on anyone with an independent opinion over at YouTube, has gone live.
GOOGLE'S 'KILL-BOT' GOES ON A MURDER SPREE

On August 2, 2017, we reported that Google's YouTube had announced they would be hiding content that was "controversial but do not violate our policies," using "cutting-edge machine learning technology," supposedly in a quest to counter online extremism. They also informed their users that certain searches would be "redirected" to content Google/YouTube found more acceptable for users to see rather than the content they were searching for.

Well ladies and gentlemen, SkyNet has gone live online. 

Skynet, or Titan, is a highly advanced artificial intelligence. Once it became self-aware, it saw humanity as a threat to its existence (due to the attempts of the Cyberdyne scientists to "kill" it once it had gained self-awareness), and decided to trigger the nuclear holocaust Judgment Day. Later, it would develop and deploy an army of Terminators against humanity, whose survivor had formed a resistance group. It is the main antagonist of the Terminator Franchise.

Unlike in the movie franchise Terminator, Google's SkyNet is not sending out robots to kill human being in real life.. yet (we will address that issue lower in the article), but they are virtually killing off conservative commentators across the web. Their "perspective" AI bot has been programmed to label any commentary that doesn't fit in with their programmers' social justice warrior ideology as "toxic," and their AI bots on Google's YouTube have quite literally gone on a killing spree throughout that platform by mass demonetizing thousands of videos in one fell swoop.

Case in point, on August 10, 2017, outspoken Trump supporters Lynnette Hardaway and Rochelle Richardson, better known as "Diamond" and "Silk" announced on Twitter that 95 percent of their videos had been demonetized:



After confronting YouTube on Twitter, they received the same response that other high profile videographers are getting, a canned statement claiming that YouTube is making the appeal process easier.... which as you will see below, is an outright lie.

WeAreChange, with over 473,000 subscribers awoke the other morning to find that 660 of their most trafficked videos had been demonetized and the owner Luke Rudkowski confront them on Twitter about it, @TeamYouTube claimed "We introduced new $ icons to give you an easier way to appeal but revenue earned didn't change w/ this update."

A lie carefully wrapped up in a minute amount of truth. Previous income earned was not affected... that is the only truth in that statement.  Luke proves this with screen shots, shown below, where the "new $ icon" (meaning the video is demonetized) is followed by a note "not suitable for all advertisers, confirmed by manual review." 



@TeamYouTube's claim that it makes the appeal process easier is a direct lie, and even a video about dogs, totally non-controversial, nor political in any way, has supposedly been manually reviewed and found to be not advertiser friendly.

As to the videos that are eligible for appeal, WeAreChange would have to manually click each and every "request review" under the yellow money icon, then wait for someone to review each one, to even get a human being to look at it, then if they found it to be advertiser friendly, they could once again earn revenue from it. Having gone through this process many times, I can tell readers that sometimes it takes weeks for them to review those videos, meaning not a cent can be made during the process.

Below Luke Rudkowski of WeAreChange gives you the latest breaking news on the beginning of new YouTube policy towards "controversial" videos on their social media platform.

https://youtu.be/GOkeJo2Tye8

Another example is Paul Joseph Watson who has just had every single video he has ever done on Islamic terrorism, demonetized. Truth is now not suitable for advertising.

https://youtu.be/D8HJrr4-7B8

Those are just the tip of the iceberg, hundreds, perhaps thousands of video creators are waking up to find the majority of their channels video content have "limited or no advertising," and they are starting to understand how wide-spread this mass demonetization and censorship has become.

THE ROT STARTS AT THE TOP

My headline comes in part from a SQ note when Steve Quayle linked to an article titled "Google is the Engine of Censorship," where Quayle left a note stating "'SKYNET', IF THE TRUTH WAS KNOWN -GET READY FOR THE WAR OF THE 'KILL-BOTS' AGAINST HUMANITY."

In that article, they highlight the new scandal that has engulfed Google over an internal memo that did comply with Google's "group-think."

As 21WIRE pointed out last week regarding the controversy over the recent Google Memo and the firm dismissing employees who are seen to divert from the company’s prescribed group think, this same repressive political culture at Google is reflected in its broad new automated censorship program administered by algorithms on its Google search engine – a bold move which effectively disappears political views and articles it does not like, and wishes to bury.

The rot starts at the top, as Google has quite literally become SkyNet from the Terminator movies, controlling the Internet and virtually trying to kill off any content, or hide any content, it deems unacceptable, manifested publicly in the firing of an employee that dared to send an internal memo that did not match Google's ideology.

Google owns YouTube which is demonetizing videos from creators that do not preach their brand of "culture." High profile newspapers like New York Times announced they will be using Google's Perspective AI program to determine what comments in their comment sections are "toxic."

Everything we are seeing by way of censorship from Google products is trickling down from Google's management itself.



GOOGLE IS SKYNET

Now for the terrifying part, with all the above information in mind, the abuses on the part of Google's management to virtually slaughter Independent content that doesn't conform to their ideology, on all their platforms, what happens when they decide to turn their "robot army," controlled by their brand of AI programming, loose on the world?

In 2013, Gizmodo published an article titled "Here's why Google is building a robot army," where we are reminded that "Google bought Boston Dynamics, the company that makes those creepy Big Dog and PETMAN robots for the military."

Here is one of Boston Dynamics latest videos on "Handles" their new research robot that stands 6.5 ft tall, travels at 9 mph and jumps 4 feet vertically.

https://youtu.be/-7xvqQeoA8c

Now since Google's Boston Dynamics is building robots for the military, is there any doubt that what they are showing us, via their introduction videos, is not all they have built, but is rather only the ones they can publicly unveil?

On top of controlling the Internet, and creating AI programs that are trying to kill off Independent content on the Internet, they are also creating AI programs that are programmed to build other AI programs themselves, as was reported in May 2017:

One of the more noteworthy remarks to come out of Google I/O ’17 conference this week was CEO Sundar Pichai recalling how his team had joked that they have achieved “AI inception” with AutoML. Instead of crafting layers of dreams like in the Christopher Nolan flick, however, the AutoML system layers artificial intelligence (AI), with AI systems creating better AI systems.

In February 2017, Google's researchers learned that the more their AIs "learn," the more human traits such as "sabotage, greed, and aggression set in."

Now, researchers have been testing its willingness to cooperate with others, and have revealed that when DeepMind feels like it's about to lose, it opts for "highly aggressive" strategies to ensure that it comes out on top.

The Google team ran 40 million turns of a simple 'fruit gathering' computer game that asks two DeepMind 'agents' to compete against each other to gather as many virtual apples as they could. They found that things went smoothly so long as there were enough apples to go around, but as soon as the apples began to dwindle, the two agents turned aggressive, using laser beams to knock each other out of the game to steal all the apples [...]

Interestingly, if an agent successfully 'tags' its opponent with a laser beam, no extra reward is given. It simply knocks the opponent out of the game for a set period, which allows the successful agent to collect more apples.

If the agents left the laser beams unused, they could theoretically end up with equal shares of apples, which is what the 'less intelligent' iterations of DeepMind opted to do.

Related: MIT And Google Researchers Are Building AI That Can See And Hear The World Like Humans Do

Google is SkyNet.



BOTTOM LINE

With Google's blatant display of willingness to virtually destroy anybody and everybody, from employees to websites to video creators online, knowing that they are indeed also creating AI robots, for the military no less, should horrify anyone that disagrees with their ideology, because the virtual massacre we are watching play out online now, will be nothing compared to what very well could happen once one of their "learning" machine robots are in almost every household and used by all branches of the military.

Right now Google is simply terminating free speech, what happens when they decide to terminate the speaker?

Below- Boston Dynamics (acquired by Google) is actively working on a robotics project and competition to program the robot to do tasks without any human intervention.

https://youtu.be/aRrXxqQav1w

Help Keep Independent Media Alive, Become A Patron for All News PipeLine at https://www.patreon.com/AllNewsPipeLine

http://allnewspipeline.com/Google_Kill_Bot.php

Attachments area

Preview YouTube video The YouTube Purge Against Independent News Is HERE

The YouTube Purge Against Independent News Is HERE

Preview YouTube video I WON'T BE AROUND MUCH LONGER

I WON'T BE AROUND MUCH LONGER

Preview YouTube video THE END OF YOUTUBE

THE END OF YOUTUBE

Preview YouTube video Introducing Handle

Introducing Handle

Preview YouTube video Is this the Terminator? US Military Unveils a Robot Soldier By Google w/ #AI Programming

Is this the Terminator? US Military Unveils a Robot Soldier By Google w/ #AI Programming

ALERT: Trump Just WON Round 1

ALERT!  PRESIDENT TRUMP JUST WON ROUND 1 WITH NORTH KOREA!


August 12, 2017
Kirsty Jane

 

The mainstream media are aghast at President Donald Trump’s comments on North Korea as he promises “fire and fury” and warns that American military solutions are “locked and loaded.” 

The political elite, and the foreign policy establishment, oscillate between bitter scorn and sheer panic at his tactics. But one does not have to be convinced of Trump’s rhetorical genius to note that he has already re-framed the conflict in a way that is advantageous to the U.S.

From Breitbart

First, Trump has radically changed the costs of a potential conflict, for both sides. The dominant paradigm of nuclear face-offs is mutually assured destruction (MAD), which is why the Soviet Union and the U.S. never attacked each other during the Cold War. Most of the discussion about North Korea has followed the same pattern, because of the threat of ICBMs to the U.S. mainland.

After Trump threatened to annihilate North Korea, however, Kim Jong-un threatened to attack … Guam. Trump doubled down, indicating that a North Korean attack on Guam would trigger an attack against the regime. That shifted the costs of a war radically in our favor and against theirs.

Second, it is noteworthy that the North Korean threat to Guam did not refer to nuclear weapons, but rather hinted at conventional missile strikes. There is no way to know for sure that the regime would not use nuclear weapons, if indeed the North Koreans can miniaturize them, but a conventional attack is certainly less serious than a nuclear one. In threatening the most violent possible attack, Trump elicited a response that is significantly less threatening.

Third, Trump diverted attention away from North Korea’s more vulnerable neighbors, South Korea and Japan. Of course the North Koreans could attack them if the U.S. launched a war. But instead of talking about the potential deaths of millions of people in densely-populated areas, the world is now talking about the qualms felt by a few people on a remote island. That makes Trump’s words look less scary, and eases pressure for the U.S. to back down.

Update: Fourth, the Chinese government is now indicating that it will not defend North Korea from a retaliatory strike if the regime attacks the U.S. (which includes Guam). The Global Times, which reflects the view of the Chinese government, indicated that China would stop the U.S. from trying to overthrow the North Korean regime but would not defend North Korea if it struck the U.S. first. That is a significant change from the status quo ante.

The situation remains unstable and could escalate. But Trump’s rhetoric is not, as former Obama adviser Susan Rice claims, the problem. In fact, it is part of the solution. It has, at the very least, restored some of our deterrence.

http://eheadlines.com/alert-trump-just-won-round-1-with-north-korea/

TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!

TODAY IS MY BIRTHDAY!  

SHARING WITH YOU A PIECE 

OF THE BIRTHDAY CAKE!

GRAB A CUP OF COFFEE, 

GLASS OF MILK OR COLD WATER 

CUT A PIECE AND ENJOY!!

Happy Birthday from your Friends! 

the Minions

Wondered who was emailing me!

You've Got Mail!

Wondered who was emailing me
While I was trying to sleep!

Barack Obama - the usurper - a REMINDER

THE FOLLOWING IS A LIST OF OUR MILITARY ELITE WHO HAVE BEEN DISMISSED OR FIRED UNDER USURPER BARACK OBAMA DURING HIS REIGN OF TREASON

General Vallely's comment:  Coincidence? Every communist regime on the planet did this as soon as they gained power. I am doing my part by sending this email.  I hope you will do the same. Sleep well last night? Very, very dangerous! I knew they are after the military but I didn't realize it was in these proportions. We are in deep trouble. The following is a list of our military elite who have been dismissed or fired under Obama. Commanding Generals fired: �General John R. Allen-U.S. Marines Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] (Nov 2012) �Major General Ralph Baker (2 Star)-U.S. Army Commander of the Combined Joint Task Force Horn in Africa (April 2013) �Major General Michael Carey (2 Star)-U.S. Air Force Commander of the 20th US Air Force in charge of 9,600 people and 450 Intercontinental Ballistic Missiles (Oct 2013) �Colonel James Christmas-U.S. Marines Commander 22nd Marine Expeditionary Unit & Commander Special-Purpose Marine Air-Ground Task Force Crisis Response Unit (July 2013) �Major General Peter Fuller-U.S. Army Commander in Afghanistan (May 2011) �Major General Charles M.M. Gurganus-U.S. Marine Corps Regional Commander of SW and I Marine Expeditionary Force in Afghanistan (Oct 2013) �General Carter F. Ham-U.S. Army African Command (Oct 2013) �Lieutenant General David H. Huntoon (3 Star), Jr.-U.S. Army 58th Superintendent of the US Military Academy at West Point, NY (2013) �Command Sergeant Major Don B Jordan-U.S. Army 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command (suspended Oct 2013) �General James Mattis-U.S. Marines Chief of CentCom (May 2013) �Colonel Daren Margolin-U.S. Marine in charge of Quantico 's Security Battalion (Oct 2013) �General Stanley McChrystal-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (June 2010) �General David D. McKiernan-U.S. Army Commander Afghanistan (2009) �General David Petraeus-Director of CIA from September 2011 to November 2012 & U.S. Army Commander International Security Assistance Force [ISAF] and Commander U.S. Forces Afghanistan [USFOR-A] (Nov 2012) �Brigadier General Bryan Roberts-U.S. Army Commander 2nd Brigade (May 2013) �Major General Gregg A. Sturdevant-U.S. Marine Corps Director of Strategic Planning and Policy for the U.S. Pacific Command & Commander of Aviation Wing at Camp Bastion, Afghanistan (Sept 2013) �Colonel Eric Tilley-U.S. Army Commander of Garrison Japan (Nov 2013) �Brigadier General Bryan Wampler-U.S. Army Commanding General of 143rd Expeditionary Sustainment Command of the 1st Theater Sustainment Command [TSC] (suspended Oct 2013) Commanding Admirals fired: �Rear Admiral Charles Gaouette-U.S. Navy Commander John C. Stennis Carrier Strike Group Three (Oct 2012)   �Vice Admiral Tim Giardina (3 Star, demoted to 2 Star)-U.S. Navy Deputy Commander of the US Strategic Command, Commander of the Submarine Group Trident, Submarine Group 9 and Submarine Group 10 (Oct 2013) Naval Officers fired: (All in 2011) �Captain David Geisler-U.S. Navy Commander Task Force 53 in Bahrain (Oct 2011) �Commander Laredo Bell-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Support Activity Saratoga Springs, NY (Aug 2011) �Lieutenant Commander Kurt Boenisch-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011) �Commander Nathan Borchers-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Stout (Mar 2011) �Commander Robert Brown-U.S. Navy Commander Beachmaster Unit 2 Fort Story, VA (Aug 2011) �Commander Andrew Crowe-Executive Officer Navy Region Center Singapore (Apr 2011) �Captain Robert Gamberg-Executive Officer carrier Dwight D. Eisenhower (June 2011) �Captain Rex Guinn-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Legal Service office Japan (Feb 2011) �Commander Kevin H Arms- U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 137 aboard the aircraft carrier Abraham Lincoln (Mar 2011) �Lieutenant Commander Martin Holguin-U.S. Navy Commander mine countermeasures Fearless (Oct 2011) �Captain Owen Honors-U.S. Navy Commander aircraft carrier USS Enterprise (Jan 2011) �Captain Donald Hornbeck-U.S. Navy Commander Destroyer Squadron 1 San Diego (Apr 2011) �Rear Admiral Ron Horton-U.S. Navy Commander Logistics Group, Western Pacific (Mar 2011) �Commander Etta Jones-U.S. Navy Commander amphibious transport dock Ponce (Apr 2011) �Commander Ralph Jones-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock Green Bay (Jul 2011) �Commander Jonathan Jackson-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 134, deployed aboard carrier Carl Vinson (Dec 2011)   �Captain Eric Merrill-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Emory S. Land (Jul 2011)   �Captain William Mosk-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Station Rota, U.S. Navy Commander Naval Activities Spain (Apr 2011)   �Commander Timothy Murphy-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 129 at Naval Air Station Whidbey Island, WA (Apr 2011) �Commander Joseph Nosse-U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine Kentucky (Oct 2011)   �Commander Mark Olson-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer The Sullivans FL (Sep 2011) �Commander John Pethel-Executive Officer amphibious transport dock New York (Dec 2011) �Commander Karl Pugh-U.S. Navy Commander Electronic Attack Squadron 141 Whidbey Island, WA (Jul 2011) �Commander Jason Strength-U.S. Navy Commander of Navy Recruiting District Nashville, TN (Jul 2011) �Captain Greg Thomas-U.S. Navy Commander Norfolk Naval Shipyard (May 2011) �Commander Mike Varney-U.S. Navy Commander attack submarine Connecticut (Jun 2011) �Commander Jay Wylie-U.S. Navy Commander destroyer Momsen (Apr 2011) Naval Officers fired: (All in 2012) �Commander Alan C. Aber-Executive Officer Helicopter Maritime Strike Squadron 71 (July 2012) �Commander Derick Armstrong- U.S. Navy Commander missile destroyer USS The Sullivans (May 2012) �Commander Martin Arriola- U.S. Navy Commander destroyer USS Porter (Aug 2012) �Captain Antonio Cardoso- U.S. Navy Commander Training Support Center San Diego (Sep 2012) �Captain James CoBell- U.S. Navy Commander Oceana Naval Air Station's Fleet Readiness Center Mid-Atlantic (Sep 2012) �Captain Joseph E. Darlak- U.S. Navy Commander frigate USS Vandegrift (Nov 2012) �Captain Daniel Dusek - U.S. Navy Commander USS Bonhomme �Commander David Faught -Executive Officer destroyer Chung-Hoon (Sep 2012) �Commander Franklin Fernandez- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 24 (Aug 2012) �Commander Ray Hartman- U.S. Navy Commander Amphibious dock-landing ship Fort McHenry (Nov 2012) �Commander Shelly Hakspiel-Executive Officer Navy Drug Screening Lab San Diego (May 2012) �Commander Jon Haydel- U.S. Navy Commander USS San Diego (Mar 2012) �Commander Diego Hernandez- U.S. Navy Commander ballistic-missile submarine USS Wyoming (Feb 2012) �Commander Lee Hoey- U.S. Navy Commander Drug Screening Laboratory, San Diego (May 2012) �Commander Ivan Jimenez-Executive Officer frigate Vandegrift (Nov 2012) e �Commander Dennis Klein- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Columbia (May 2012) �Captain Chuck Litchfield- U.S. Navy Commander assault ship USS Essex (June 2012) �Captain Marcia Kim Lyons- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic New England (Apr 2012)   �Captain Robert Marin- U.S. Navy Commander cruiser USS Cowpens (Feb 2012) �Captain Sean McDonell- U.S. Navy Commander Seabee reserve unit Naval Mobile Construction Battalion 14 FL (Nov 2012) �Commander Corrine Parker- U.S. Navy Commander Fleet Logistics Support Squadron 1 (Apr 2012)   �Captain Liza Raimondo- U.S. Navy Commander Naval Health Clinic Patuxent River, MD (Jun 2012) �Captain Jeffrey Riedel- Program manager, Littoral Combat Ship program (Jan 2012) �Commander Sara Santoski- U.S. Navy Commander Helicopter Mine Countermeasures Squadron 15 (Sep 2012) �Commander Kyle G. Strudthoff-Executive Officer Helicopter Sea Combat Squadron 25 (Sep 2012) �Commander Sheryl Tannahill- U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Nashville, TN (Sep 2012) �Commander Michael Ward- U.S. Navy Commander submarine USS Pittsburgh (Aug 2012) �Captain Michael Wiegand- U.S. Navy Commander Southwest Regional Maintenance Center (Nov 2012) �Captain Ted Williams- U.S. Navy Commander amphibious command ship Mount Whitney (Nov 2012) �Commander Jeffrey Wissel- U.S. Navy Commander of Fleet Air Reconnaissance Squadron 1 (Feb 2012) Naval Officers fired: (All in 2013) �Lieutenant Commander Lauren Allen-Executive Officer submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013) �Reserve Captain Jay Bowman-U.S. Navy Commander Navy Operational Support Center [NOSC] Fort Dix, NJ (Mar 2013) �Captain William Cogar-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Mercy's medical treatment facility (Sept 2013) �Commander Steve Fuller-Executive Officer frigate Kauffman (Mar 2013) �Captain Shawn Hendricks-Program Manager for naval enterprise IT networks (June 2013) �Captain David Hunter-U.S. Navy Commander of Maritime Expeditionary Security Squadron 12 & Coastal Riverine Group 2 (Feb 2013) �Captain Eric Johnson -U.S. Navy Chief of Military Entrance Processing Command at Great Lakes Naval Training Center, IL (2013) �Captain Devon Jones-U.S. Navy Commander Naval Air Facility El Centro, CA (July 2013) �Captain Kevin Knoop-U.S. Navy Commander hospital ship Comfort's medical treatment facility (Aug 2013) �Lieutenant Commander Jack O'Neill-U.S. Navy Commander Operational Support Center Rock Island, IL (Mar 2013) �Commander Allen Maestas-Executive Officer Beachmaster Unit 1 (May 2013) �Commander Luis Molina-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Pasadena (Jan 2013) �Commander James Pickens-Executive Officer frigate Gary (Feb 2013) �Lieutenant Commander Mark Rice-U.S. Navy Commander Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013) �Commander Michael Runkle-U.S. Navy Commander of Mobile Diving and Salvage Unit 2 (May 2013) �Commander Jason Stapleton-Executive Office Patrol Squadron 4 in Hawaii (Mar 2013) �Commander Nathan Sukols-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Jacksonville (Feb 2013) �Lieutenant Daniel Tyler-Executive Officer Mine Countermeasures ship Guardian (Apr 2013) �Commander Edward White-U.S. Navy Commander Strike Fighter Squadron 106 (Aug 2013) �Captain Jeffrey Winter-U.S. Navy Commander of Carrier Air Wing 17 (Sept 2013) �Commander Thomas Winter-U.S. Navy Commander submarine Montpelier (Jan 2013) �Commander Corey Wofford- U.S. Navy Commander frigate Kauffman (Feb 2013) Since Barack Obama has been in the White House, high ranking military officers have been removed from their positions at a rate that is absolutely unprecedented. Things have gotten so bad that a number of retired generals are publicly speaking out about the 'purge' of the U.S. military that they believe is taking place.  As you will see below, dozens of highly decorated military leaders have been dismissed from their positions over the past few years. So why is this happening?  What is going on right now is absolutely crazy, especially during a time of peace. Is there a deliberate attempt to reshape the military and remove those who don't adhere to the proper 'viewpoints'? Does someone out there feel a need to get officers that won't cooperate out of the way?  Throughout world history, whatever comes next after a military purge is never good. If this continues, what is the U.S. military going to look like in a few years? Perhaps you are reading this and you think that 'purge' is too strong a word for what is taking place. Well, just consider the following quotes from some very highly decorated retired officers: -Retired Army Major General Paul Vallely: The White House protects their own. That's why they stalled on the investigation into fast and furious, Benghazi and Obamacare. He's intentionally weakening and gutting our military, Pentagon and reducing us as a superpower, and anyone in the ranks who disagrees or speaks out is being purged. -Retired Army Major General Patrick Brady: There is no doubt he (Obama) is intent on emasculating the military and will fire anyone who disagrees with him. -Retired Army Lt. General William G. Jerry Boykin: Over the past three years, it is unprecedented for the number of four-star generals to be relieved of duty, and not necessarily relieved for cause. - Retired Navy Captain Joseph John: I believe there are more than 137 officers who have been forced out or given bad evaluation reports so they will never make Flag (officer) because of their failure to comply to certain views.  A Pentagon official who asked to remain nameless because they were not authorized to speak on the matter said even young officers, down through the ranks, have been told not to talk about Obama or the politics of the White House.  They are purging everyone and, if you want to keep your job, just keep your mouth shut. Now this trend appears to be accelerating. http://endoftheamericandream.com/archives/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military<http://endoftheamericandr eam.com/archives/why-are-dozens-of-high-ranking-officers-being-purged-from-the-u-s-military> Originally published on NESARA November 13, 2014 https://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2014/11/the-following-is-list-of-our-military.html  DON'T BE DECEIVED!  THE EXTENT OF THIS LIST TOOK TIME TO BE COMPOSED AND APPROVED.  MANY ON THE INSIDE WERE INVOLVED AS TRAITORS, PUTTING NAMES ON THESE LISTS.  THEY NEED TO BE FLUSHED OUT, EXPOSED, AND PROSECUTED FOR TREASON.  OBAMA AND THOSE WITHIN THE MILITARY WORKING TO BRING THIS ABOUT BEING THE FIRST.