Friends,
Read an article about BRIBED CALIFORNIA JUDGES, #PEDOGATE: The California Cesspool of Judicial Corruption is Inconceivable,which is published on a wonderful website, State of the Nation.100% Truthful information!
On Monday, November 13, 2017,
I visited the Santa Clara County Court of California. The big
demonstration took place in the front of the Santa Clara County Court.
The Desperate Residents of the Santa Clara County requested to
arrest and bring to justice-corrupted judges of the Santa Clara County
Court, who took children from their mothers and families and sent these
little children to the pedophiles. The Residents of the Santa Clara
County wore white T-shits with photos of little children, whom
corrupted judges took from their mothers and families and sent to the
pedophiles. I talked with a woman, a God Mother of two little children,
whom corrupted judges took from their mother and sent to a custody of
pedophiles. The little girls were sexually abused! I will send you
photos.
I was in the court because the organized pedophile satanic crime syndicate filed their eight fraudulent lawsuit against me, Case 17CV318715. I submitted documents, in which I exposed corrupted Judges such as Jewish Fraud Judge Carol Overton, her crime partners: former Presiding Judge Rise Pichon and well-known in California Jewish Satanist Attorney Rothbard, a High Level Fraud!
Two
days prior to this visit, I helped a desperate disabled woman, who
resides in the Foster City. I exposed Fraud Attorney Rothbard, who
forged her signature in the San Mateo County Court of California, trying
to evict this disabled senior citizen from her apartment, the Case UDL-08887.
The Wild Brigandage and Lawlessness in the Courts of California!
Nina Sidorova
Some Quotes from an article below:The California Superior Court system into a profit center!
To maintain due process, all Judges are required to disclose pecuniary ($) interest in any case in which they preside. If Superior Court Judges receive payments from the County under a “secret” contract, they must recuse themselves from any case where the County is a party.
Clearly this does not happen; however, any defendant or plaintiff which raises this issue will see all the rats, I mean Judges, rapidly recuse themselves. The contracts between the Judges and the County are NOT public documents and attempts to get access to them have been protected by the very Judges the contract seeks to implicate. What are they hiding?
In immediate response to “Sturgeon I,” the California Legislature passed section 68220 to the Government Code which gave (1) retroactive immunity to the judges that received the bribes, (2) allowed counties the choice of whether to pay supplemental benefits at all; and (3) it left existing disparities in judicial benefits between the various counties intact.And once the State has the child in foster care, they have no obligation to track whether they have gone missing. Missing children mean loss of payments, so no one reports it, especially CPS. Only when the parent goes looking for the child is it determined that they are missing. Children are sold, sexually assaulted, abused, raped, and killed all while in the care of CPS. But the California needs the money and Judge need the bribes.
#PEDOGATE: The California Cesspool of Judicial Corruption is
Inconceivable
CHILD TRAFFICKING AT THE INTERSECTION OF BRIBED CALIFORNIA JUDGES, CHILD PROTECTIVE SERVICES, AND THE DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES
We
are all too familiar with how Child Protective Services has been
implicated as a major source of Child Trafficking, but what we are not
aware of is how the bribed State Judges and the Department of Health and
Human Services make it all possible. Let’s take the California
Superior Court System as an example. What you are about to hear should
chill you to the bone. It is a story of Judicial Treachery on a scale
unprecedented in US history and is 100% true.
To understand how this all works, we must understand the landscape and how it almost came to an end in California.
Associate
Justice Patricia Benke wrote in her 37-page opinion of Sturgeon v.
County of Los Angeles (2008) 167 Cal.App.4th 630 (Sturgeon I), “The duty
to prescribe judicial compensation is not delegable. Thus the practice
of the County of Los Angeles (the county) providing Los Angeles County
superior court judges with employment benefits, in addition to the
compensation prescribed by the Legislature, is not permissible.” This
affirmed the principle that judicial compensation is a state, not a
county, responsibility. The Appeals court found that by providing
substantial employment benefits to its superior court judges, defendant
County of Los Angeles (the county) violated article VI, section 19 of
our Constitution, which requires that compensation for judges be
prescribed by the Legislature. https://www.judicialwatch.org/press-room/press-releases/california-court-appeals-rules-extra-compensation-los-angeles-county-judges-violates-c/
Wikipedia
states, “The Fifth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States
Constitution each contain a due process clause. Due process deals with
the administration of justice and thus the due process clause acts as a
safeguard from arbitrary denial of life, liberty, or property by the
government outside the sanction of law.[1] The Supreme Court of
the United States interprets the clauses more broadly because these
clauses provide four protections: procedural due process (in civil and
criminal proceedings), substantive due process, a prohibition against
vague laws, and as the vehicle for the incorporation of the Bill of
Rights. Due process ensures the rights and equality of all citizens.”
To
maintain due process, all Judges are required to disclose pecuniary ($)
interest in any case in which they preside. If Superior Court Judges
receive payments from the County under a “secret” contract, they must
recuse themselves from any case where the County is a party. Clearly
this does not happen; however, any defendant or plaintiff which raises
this issue will see all the rats, I mean Judges, rapidly recuse
themselves. The contracts between the Judges and the County are NOT
public documents and attempts to get access to them have been protected
by the very Judges the contract seeks to implicate. What are they
hiding?
Your
initial response might be, “So what, Judges are venerable and these
payments do not corrupt them. How dare you imply a corrupt motive?”
First,
it was the Appeals Court which determined these bribes were illegal
payments in violation of the California Constitution. But let’s
consider the broader ramifications. If you are prosecuted by the
County, how can a Superior Court Judge of the same county preside over
the case if they are receiving an illegal bribe via a “Secret” contract?
Even
after the payments were deemed illegal, did they end? No, the Counties
continue to make them. Why? All you need to do is ask, who benefits.
Why are these payments important?
There are several reasons why the counties continue to make these payments.
- County Supervisor pay is linked to Superior Court Judges compensation.
- Bribed Judges give favorable rulings to County Prosecutors.
- Title IV Incentive payments.
Numbers
1 and 2 are self-evident greed. Number 3, “Title IV Incentive
Payments,” leads to due process violations, bias, and child
trafficking. These Title IV payments to the State create an incentive.
Specifically, Title IV includes:
Part-A (Grants to States for Temporary Assistance for Needy Families),
Part-B (Child and Family Services),
Part-D (Child Support and Establishment of Paternity), and
Part-E (Fed Payments for Foster Care & Adoption Assistance).
The designation “IV” actually refers to Title IV of the Social Security Act of 1975,
which covers grants to states for the purpose of providing aid and
services to needy families with children. The Administration of
Children and Families (ACF) administers benefit payments under Title IV
through HHS. The FY 2017 Budget request for the Administration for
Children and Families (ACF) is $63.0 billion. The Mandatory Budget is
$43.1 Billion with the majority based on Title IV:
Child Care Entitlement to States $2.917 billion,
Child Care and Development Fund $5.678 billion,
Child Support Enforcement and Family Support $4,311 billion, and
Temporary Assistance for Needy Families (TANF) $16.739 billion. https://www.hhs.gov/about/budget/fy2017/budget-in-brief/acf/mandatory/index.html
If
$63 Billion is available and California has 14% of the US Population,
the State stands to receive almost $9 billion in Federal Reimbursements.
The California Superior Court system into a profit center!
Sturgeon
I threatened to shut off this source of federal reimbursement funds
because the Judges, for their part in the conspiracy were not going to
do it for free. The California Legislature understood the threat, “If
you don’t do something to ensure the payments to the California Judges
continue, we will shut off Title IV Federal Reimbursement payments.”
In
immediate response to “Sturgeon I,” the California Legislature passed
section 68220 to the Government Code which gave (1) retroactive immunity
to the judges that received the bribes, (2) allowed counties the choice
of whether to pay supplemental benefits at all; and (3) it left
existing disparities in judicial benefits between the various counties
intact.
45 CFR Part § 304.12 (b) Incentive payments to States related
to Title IV. Essentially, reimbursement is based ratios of the State’s
Title IV-A, Title IV-D, and non-title IV-A collections. Putting people
into Title IV programs, voluntarily or involuntarily, means money for
California, money for Judges, and money for Supervisors. Whose money?
YOUR MONEY.
So how does this work?
The
bribes mean that Judges AND attorneys both have an incentive to create
“high conflict” cases which extend Family Court proceedings while they
order psychiatric evaluations of mothers and fathers by unlicensed
con-artists, force minors into foster care, remove children from homes,
award high child support, alimony payments to abusive and raping spouse,
and bleed both parties to ensure there is a higher chance one or both
parties will continue to need state assistance. The more money sent
means larger incentive payment. Higher ratios of Title IV means high
percentage reimbursement.
A
bridge too far? Maybe you can explain why would Judge Gregory Pollack
of San Diego Superior Court awarded the sexual assault victim to pay
alimony to her rapist husband in November 2012? Simple, it was the end
of the year and California needed to ensure maximum reimbursement § 304.12 (b) Incentive payments to States.
We suspect California needed to boost its ratio to increase its
percentage returns. Only because the victim went on a political
campaign that led the California Legislature to introduced a bill that
would keep any victim of violent sexual crime perpetrated by a spouse
from having to pay alimony to the abusive former spouse. Who can
disagree with that? Well, I can because it was the “Incentive Payments”
which lead to this decision. The decision by Judge Gregory Pollack was
egregious, but the source of the problem was Title IV incentive
payments.
On May 29, 2015 S. 178, the “Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015”
was signed into law after much political fighting. However, this is
more in the wrong direction. Solutions like these will make the problem
worse, not better! Government funding is the problem and in comes in
the form 45 CFR Part § 304.12 (b) Incentive payments to States.
Bribes to California Superior Court Judges in the form of these
“secret” contracts ensure the Judiciary provides a steady stream Title
IV rulings in a ratio to maximize federal reimbursements.
Ironically, the “S. 178 – Justice for Victims of Trafficking Act of 2015”
that just passed under the auspices of dealing with child sex
trafficking, will actually perpetuate the problem and make it worse, by
funneling even more federal funds into social services for children and
troubled youth. Georgia Senator Nancy Schaefer was one of the few who
did speak out about the bill and try to do something to stop this
horrendous problem, but predictably she now is dead. Her published
report, The Corrupt Business of Child Protective Services, is reproduced is here.
How much money are we talking about?
Enough
money to bribe judges! One child taken into foster care can bring in up
to $1 million of revenue to the State. Children who need “extra care”
are given many medical treatments, such as psychotropic drugs. So guess
what, California Foster Care prescribes psychiatric drugs at a rate
well beyond malpractice, but it ensures more money. (See: California’s Crisis: 1 Out of Every 4 Children in California’s Foster Care Prescribed Powerful Psychiatric Drugs)
And
once the State has the child in foster care, they have no obligation to
track whether they have gone missing. Missing children mean loss of
payments, so no one reports it, especially CPS. Only when the parent
goes looking for the child is it determined that they are missing.
Children are sold, sexually assaulted, abused, raped, and killed all
while in the care of CPS. But the California needs the money and Judge
need the bribes.
Where is the Child Trafficking?
The
child trafficking industry, or human trafficking industry right now,
makes more money than the illegal drug trade, and illegal arms trade,
combined. In California, all of this is possible due to the bribed
Judges, California Superior Court system, and the legislature’s
insatiable appetite for Incentive Payments to fill the budgetary gap.
There is so much corruption between Family Court and Child Protective Services
Anything else?
In
2012, the $2 billion California Court Case Management System was set to
be rolled out to all of California. It was intended to automate
California court operations with a common system across the state and
replace 70 different legacy systems. However, the State had other plans
after wasting all our money. The system would have made information
regarding Judicial corruption at everyone fingertips. Statistically
speaking, it would be very easy to determine which County places
Judicial Bribes above the good of the people, what time of year to file a
divorce, or any amount of statistical information that could be used to
describe the current state of affairs.
While
we are unable to find information related directly to the amount of
incentive payments made according to each County, we suspect that if we
looked at the amount contributed by each county and compared it to the
amount of supplemental pay to Superior Court Judges by the County, we
would see a strong correlation. The contract between the County and the
Superior Court would likely spell this out, which is the reason these
contracts are protected.
We
suspect that we could make a huge dent in Child Trafficking by
eliminating these Incentive Payments, but the corruption must continue
no matter the cost. And in case you think these bribes are needed to
ensure competent Judges, consider that the Judges are elected positions
in California. Having practiced in front of many California Judges, I
can tell you that we can’t do any worse. Maybe, just maybe lower pay
will call more principled individuals to the job, but they are lawyers
to begin with. You can take the Judge out of the lawyer, but you cannot
take the lawyer out of the Judge.
KEY POINT: The
Adoption and the Safe Families Act, set in motion by President Bill
Clinton, offered cash “bonuses” to the states for every child they
adopted out of foster care. In order to receive the “adoption incentive
bonuses” local child protective services need more children. They must
have merchandise (children) that sell and you must have plenty of them
so the buyer can choose. Some counties are known to give a $4,000 bonus
for each child adopted and an additional $2,000 for a “special needs”
child. Employees work to keep the federal dollars flowing.
Reference
