Official Declaration
of
Contempt of
Constitution
by
The People of the United States
of America
With this
Document, Filed, Presented or Posted with any agency, department,
representative or body politic of government in any form which such government
shall take, shall be construed by force
majeure as the same shall be duly gathered by We THE People,
and the same shall at any time be required or necessary, to be an official and
undeniable Declaration of CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION for the People of the
United States of America, and sets forth the following information and
Declaration in support thereof.
The inherent authority
and power to charge one with contempt of court has long been recognized within
the courts and the legal structure of the governments of the United States of
America. It has been well understood, and is accepted, that such authority and power
belongs to common law courts as a result of the nature of what contempt of
court is, an inherent authority and power being undeniable and un-separable to
the courts because of the nature of what that authority and power is. It is
further recognized by We THE People, as claimed by the courts themselves, that
contempt of court is the highest authority and power as being true and correct
on its face accordingly.
Likewise, it
is recognized that such authority and power arose first from an acknowledgement
and allowance of the King of England in the early Eighteenth century, or early
1700’s, as revealed by the U.S. Supreme Court case of In Re Green v.
U.S., N.Y., 78 S. Ct. 632, 356
U.S. 165, 2L. Ed. 2d 672. This revelation being thus shown to illustrate the
fact that the power of contempt of court itself actually comes under the
sovereignty of a country just as it did in England at that time centuries ago, proves
to the People and establishes by like principle that the power of contempt of
court in the United States also belongs under
the ultimate Sovereignty of the United States of America the republic
thereof, or the People, as was expressly embodied in the Preamble as “We the
People.”
Proclaiming
and explaining the inherent right of the courts themselves to simply declare
the right to contempt of court, it is stated at Corpus Juris Secundun, Volume
17, Section 43, Page 108 that “In order that any human agency may accomplish
its purpose, it is necessary that it possess power." The executive must
have power to direct or control his business. The Superintendent must have
power to direct his men. In order to accomplish the purposes for which they
were created, courts must also possess powers. … these powers are called
inherent powers. Among these powers is the power to punish for contempt.”
We THE People of the United States
of America, having come together in peaceful assembly to return to Original
Jurisdiction and Venue and return the formation of a republic, being noted in
the Preamble as “We the People,” likewise have, and hereby reveal and
prescribe, an Inherent Authority and Power, and for the same or similar
reasons, in their own fashion, do so reason and Declare:
In order that any human
body of people forming a constitution representing them directly by prescribed
or written agency may accomplish their
purposes, in order to keep their constitution secure, safe and sound in its
integrity, clean, pure, inviolable (not being violated), it is necessary that that
body of people possess all inherent authority and power. The
business owner must have authority and power to direct or control his business
or punish or fire bad employees who refuse to be directed or controlled as
required. The Superintendent must have authority and power to direct his men.
In order to accomplish the purpose for which they created a
Constitution, a People organized in a republic, or even recognized between
themselves as bearing or having a constitution, whether or not written, must
also possess Authority and Powers. …these authorities and powers are called
Inherent Authorities and Powers. These Authorities and Powers are undeniable,
irrevocable, irreversible, indisputable, and unalienable, by any elements of
government. Among these authorities and powers is the authority and power to
punish for Contempt of Constitution. Contempt of Constitution belongs and is
inherent to We THE People alone. No part
of authority or power of government may attach it, detract from it, taint it,
or approach it.
Furthermore,
not only does the Inherent Authority and Power of Contempt of Constitution
belong to the People alone, wherefore no body of government may approach it
without committing Contempt of Constitution at its highest level, but the
principle of Contempt of Constitution was embodied by the Constitution’s Founding
Fathers or Framers, at Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, perceived and understood
therein as “breach of Peace” being understood so to be, to wit:
Treason and
Felony are referred to in Article I, Section 6, Clause 1, but Misdemeanor is
not. Thus, mere Misdemeanors, even if seemingly causing a breach of peace by
today’s standards, would not be sufficient to prevent a Congressman or Senator
from attending Congress in session. Reviewing all forms of Misdemeanors and
recognizing that none of them apply to such a breach as described in the
Constitution, by process of elimination, the only kind of breach that could be
so serious as to be thought by the Founding Fathers as being worthy to stop an
attendance of Congress in session was that kind of an offense serious enough to
be regarded as equal or greater than the commitment of either a treason of
felony.
Whenever any person of We THE People,
or the People as a Whole, shall have their rights subsequent to mandated rights
and requirements usurped by government, and shall further have as to such
abuse, contempt, or usurpation by government their:
Rights that any person or People not be assaulted in their fundamental
or constitutional rights or their rights of due process in connection with
Life, Liberty and Property are abused or denied (5th Amendment);
Rights to be or feel secure in their houses, not just house, as to all
their communications, even with modern technology, the advent of modern
technology not amending the Constitution in any part thereof (4th
Amendment);
Rights to feel secure while traveling abroad by not being forced under
penalty of fine or imprisonment (being in duress, by the conduct of government
agents) or violation of other rights to show or produce their papers (4th
& 5th Amendment);
Rights of speech, religion, assembly, the press, and petition, not
polluted with false concepts of expression leading to gross depravity.
Perversion, and leading to all forms of social self-destruction, including
children murdering children (1st & 9th Amendments);
Rights to exist peacefully in their homes during times of peace (3rd
Amendment);
Rights not to have the State’s militia suppressed, oppressed, or done
away with under pretense or disguise of being a national guard, or military
assaults committed against private homes for constitutionally violation
purposes (Article I, Section 8, Clause 16 & 2nd, 8th
and 10th Amendments);
Rights of justice
by an impartial jury, under control (trial, try – to control) of a Jury, not
under control of a judge, thus representing the People directly (Article III,
Section 2, Clause 3 and the 6th Amendment);
Rights
to not
have judges wearing the (black) robes of England or any other country, to not
be required to “all rise” for, to not be required to speak, say or
lavish the title of honor where no constitutional law can be required of the
People to do so, and to have government of the United States and of the several
States to not support, either by law or by practice, a title of such as, but
not limited to “esquire,” or any association or organization, foreign or
domestic, in support thereof (Article I, Section 9, Clause 8 and Article I,
Section 10, Clause 1);
Rights to be fully informed of all material facts
that transpire in the courts, not to have judges or attorneys take “silent
judicial notice” of elements of proceedings thereby impairing the
obligation of contract with the court (Article I, Section 10, Clause 6);
Rights
to have
the separation of powers between the several States and the United States in
cases of criminal offense alleged and recognized (Article III, Section 2,
Clause 3);
Rights
to have
all commerce not crossing or else no longer crossing a State’s borders
recognized as intrastate commerce, not interstate commerce, and therefore not
under the power and authority of the United States government (Article I,
Section 8, Clause 3);
Rights
to not
have Congress have the right to regulate (make regular or uniform) commerce
among the States (or interstate commerce) to be extended to mean “to
regulate or control interstate society” where such wording is not
plainly stated (not being found in Article I, Section 8, Clause 3);
Rights
to assistance
of counsel (not necessarily attorney or lawyers), assistance not being forced,
controlled or limited by any organization
what-so-ever (6th Amendment);
Rights against governmental and other encroachments to have civil
matters in cases of determined value tried by jury, also not under the control
of a lawyer judge (7th Amendment);
Rights of reasonable bail set, but not by prosecution and trial, and no
cruel and unusual punishment (8th Amendment);
Rights to not be forced to use an unlawfull form of money,
consideration or value received on export (or income from an accounting
standpoint) be taxable by the United States Corporation or Government, weather
alleged to be to any foreign country or to any local county or
State or nation, or no tax on the export side of interstate commerce in any
form (Article I, Section 9, Clause 5);
Rights to the Inherent Right to have the language of the People, in all
aspects to which it applies to them, belong to the People alone and under their
control, and to not belong to or be controlled by any form of government
thereof to any degree whatsoever, and rights to the common law thereunder (9th,
5th and 7th Amendments);
Rights to have all rights, through not specifically numbered
(enumerated) within the Constitution but retained without Article V required
amendment, retained by the First Generation, or that generation which came
under the wording “retained by the people” (9th Amendment);
Rights to have certain powers considered forever and distinctly
separate between bodies of government, United States, States, and People (10th
Amendment);
Rights to bear arms in order to secure against the loss of the
condition of a free state, whether by overt or covert means, being the loss of
right to Life, Liberty and Property without due process of the law (2nd
Amendment combined with the 5th Amendment);
Rights of all other things as they exist within the main body of the
Constitution itself as well as other parts of the Constitution not named;
Then they, the
People, are NOT at peace by any of these breaches, either as individuals, or as
a People, and Peace clearly has been breached thereby. Article I, Section 6, Clause 1- the minimal
embodiment of Contempt of Constitution.
THEREFORE, by these unalienable and mutual understandings beheld now by
We THE People, whether or not previously spoken, written, or declared by any
knowledge of fact or law, and by mutual covenants of the People, by the People,
and between the People unspoken and unwritten yet existent, thus giving their
heart-felt, undeniable, and solemn consent to this proceeding, without regard
to any expressed numeration of the People so represented hereby but being all
inclusive for all of the People United, the People of the United States of
America and of the Several States do file and Declare CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION
to belong as an inherent Power to them, the People, alone, AND THAT by each and
every filing and declaration of this Inherent Power throughout the land, this
Unalienable Power of Contempt of Constitution shall, for the People alone, GROW
EXPOENTIALLY accordingly.
THAT because
Contempt by its own nature is a Quasi-Crime, or has many different appearances
and aspects, and not a civil offense, and because there are different classes
of Contempt, re: Corpus Juris Secundum, Volume 17, Section 43,
Page 115, it is necessary to set forth what appears to be the different classes
of Contempt of Constitution herein.
Definitions
The
definition(s) of Contempt of Constitution is as follows: Contempt of Constitution
is a Sovereign Crime, committed against the sovereign person(s) = People
whom such Constitution represents. For the purposes of defining Contempt of
Constitution as applicable to the Constitution for the United States of America,
the classification of and degrees of types of Contempt of Constitution and like
crimes shall be, and hereby are:
General Contempt. Where Contempt has been
committed or asserted, but may have been done ignorantly or unknowingly. (Not a
defense) This shall include Attempted Contempt.
Malicious Contempt. Where General Contempt has
been repeated, so that ignorance of the law is clearly no excuse, or contempt
deliberately committed with afore knowledge, or where the results of the
contempt is severe against one or more of the person(s) = People victimized by
it so that a distinct harm has befallen or inevitably will befall such person(s)
= People.
Tyrannical Malicious Contempt. Contempt so strong that it is apparent that
the author(s) of tyranny work(s) act of Malicious Contempt, on a similar or
dissimilar basis, in an effort, no matter how small, to gain a destructive
power over any person=People within the United States of America or any of its
territories, or where a corrupt use, or corrupt taking-part in such use, of
power, whether or not, by any manner delegated, whereby such power may be used
maliciously toward any citizen or any person=People under the protection of the
Constitution and Bill of Rights of the United States of America.
Noble Contempt. Noble Contempt of Constitution
occurs when a person or business is recognized and=or treated differently,
either greater or lesser, under any operation of law (even though a special fee
{which shall be unlawfull} might have been paid to a government for such
special recognition) that is recognized for other common or ordinary People, as
well as for businesses. Noble Contempt also exists wherein private People or
businesses are elevated in status above other common People or businesses by
either what they are provided as rights to be entitled, above other People
of equal merit, to do or by where they are regarded by some sense of fame
already in existence as to be given advantage(s) that other ordinary or common People
or businesses under the same circumstances would not be provided. Noble
Contempt shall also include Noble Contempt by De-nobilization, which is an
act of subjecting an individual or even a specific populous to a condition of
degradation or reduction in status of importance under the law, whether by
statute, code, regulation or common law, in favor of not reducing all People equally,
to be affected thereby. This jurisdictional charge and all penalties hereunder,
shall apply to both People and non-nationals of the United States of America
and of any State. This is an Inherent Power expressed by the Constitution at
Article I, Section 9 Clause 8, and Article I, Section 10, Clause 1.
Noble Malicious Contempt.
Is the
establishment of Noble Contempt where the party or parties involved in such
contemptuous activity refuse to vacate such Contempt and such Contempt can be
shown to work a hardship or deprivation of common rights upon any
other United States of America native born national or native born in a state
of the union. This jurisdictional charge and all penalties hereunder, shall
apply to both native born People and non-nationals of the United States of
America and of any State. This is an Inherent Authority and Power expressed by
the Constitution at article I, Section 9, Clause 8 and Article I, Section 10,
Clause 1.
Noble Tyrannical Malicious Contempt.
Is the
establishment of Noble Contempt on a harsh and repetitive basis where the party
or parties involved in such contemptuous activity effectuate such Contempt to
the degree that it represents a blatant disregard for basic human rights,
rights embraced by the Constitution, where gross insensitivity toward the
suffering of any United States of America native born Freeman or Free-Woman is
the result, and it is reasonably believed that the party or parties knew of the
unconstitutionality of their acts but proceeded with obvious Contempt to
continue them at any cost, or where there shall be a corrupt use of power in
conjunction with such Noble Tyrannical Malicious Contempt, whether or not, by
any manner, delegated, that may be used maliciously as toward any native born
Freeman or Free-Woman of, or any person=People under the protection of the
United States of America nor any of its territories. Furthermore, Noble
Tyrannical Malicious Contempt may be recognized as having been committed in any
event where the wanton disregard for the rights, safety and secureness of the
common native born Freeman or free-Woman, whether or not the same shall be
considered sovereign, is enacted, as represented by the scientific formula
written as " ∑(#1) = F∞" (Total Humanity),” putting all or a great
portion of humanity at risk of life and=or liberty for the benefit of one,
which may be representatively defined in analogical format, put in
antiquated-like, but not clearly expressive terms as, “The Sum of Me is Equal To All of Thee.”
IN THE FURTHERANCE of this DECLARATION of CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION, where
there shall be any attempt to refute, deny, or twist the same so as to be made
of alleged non-effect, while holding that the authority and power of contempt
of court exists at all, it is further hereby NOTED, UNDERSTOOD, and DECLARED
THAT if there be at any time any claim that CONTEMPT OF CONSTITUTION does not exist or that the
We THE People have no right thereto, that contempt of court does not exist or
that the We THE People have no right thereto, then contempt of court does not
exist either, nor contempt of legislature, nor contempt of the executive; the
lower cannot supersede the higher, nor set it aside. Therefore, any attempt to
declare that Contempt of Constitution does not exist for or belong to We THE
People alone in favor of contempt of court or any other authority or power of
government, represents a Contempt of Constitution to the Tyrannical Malicious
Degree, and is inherently prosecutable there under.
Other forms of Contempt of Constitution may exist as We THE People
alone discern or duly proclaim them to be hereafter.
NOTED NOW, and DESCERNED. There is no statute of limitations of
Contempt of Constitution, and there can be none, except it be declared by We
THE People themselves, which they shall not, except it be by Amendment by Pure
Convention, (shall) do.
Contempt of
Constitution
Has been formally and officially Declared by this
proceeding to the same extent as contempt of court was first declared many ages
ago, and has the same lawfull intent and purpose as does contempt of court, the
keeping and securing of the Constitution in a safe and sound condition,
maintaining its integrity in its rights established solely for the benefit of We
THE People of the United States of America.
A tribunal representing a lawfull force recognized by and under
the Constitution of the United States of America (Article I, Section 8, Clause
9), also by the power of the tribunals long known and existing under common
law, by the power of separate and third party existence as
established under the Tenth Amendment to the Constitution of the United States
of America, Circa 1778 as amended at 1791, the Tribunal of We THE People
undersigned, representing the People in law and in sovereign law, whether by
direct representation or by those solemn and sovereign authority and powers in
spirit and in fact as embodied and held, being retained by the First Generation
as set forth and required by the Ninth Amendment to the Constitution of the
United States of America, now hereby below subscribe their appellations, giving
force, authority and power to this proceeding and Declaration, by use by proxy
of the appellations of those Founding Fathers whose historical appellations now
are entered below upon this Extraordinary Writ of Sovereign Declaration, joined
by others thereafter in spirit and=or in fact, this Declaration of Contempt
of Constitution is and has been put into Perpetual and Sovereign Effect and
Power by the Power and Effect of these Three appellations so autographed, real People=Citizens
standing in Symbolic Proxy for the Same, and is therefore,
{Place your statement of facts and=or your issue by verified Affidavit}
It is Ordered,
Sentenced and Decreed by the Lawfull Authority and
Power by the Political Will of We
THE People of the United States of America the date of the Declaration of this
Inherent Authority and Power of Contempt of Constitution being Timeless,
extending to all times when the offense(s) shall have been committed, by
Autograph: (Seal)
Autograph: (Seal)
Autograph: (Seal)
Former
law: See sections 1 and 2 of Act 322 of 1919, being CL 1929, §§ 8520
and 8521.
750.352 Molesting and disturbing persons in pursuit of
occupation, vocation or avocation.
Sec.,
352. Any person or persons who shall, by threats, intimidations, or otherwise,
and without authority
(of) law,
interfere with, or in any way molest, or attempt to interfere with, or in any
way molest or disturb, without such authority, any person, in the quiet and
peaceable pursuit of his lawful occupation, vocation or avocation, or on the
way to and from such occupation, vocation or avocation, or who shall aid or
abet in any such unlawful acts, shall be guilty of a misdemeanor.
History: 1931, Act
328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931; - Am. 1947, Act 297, Eff. Oct. 11, 1947; - CL 1948,
750.352.
Former
law: See section 1 of Act 163 of 1867, being CL 1871, § 7690; How., §
9273; CL 1897, § 11343; CL 1915, § 15010; and
1929, §
8612.
750.505 Punishment for indictable common law offenses.
Sec. 505.
Any person who shall commit any indictable offense at the common law, for the
punishment of
which no
provision is expressly made by any statute of this state, shall be guilty of a
felony, punishable by
imprisonment
in the state prison not more than 5 years or by a fine of not more than
$10,000.00, or both in the discretion of the court.
History: 1931, Act
328, Eff. Sept. 18, 1931; - CL 1948, 750.505; - Am. 1954, Act 66, Eff. Aug. 13,
1954.
Former law:
See section 15 of Ch. IX of Act 175 of 1927, being CL 1929, §
17343.
Each State
should have similar laws on their books.
in October 2013 to email a video of a man engaging in sexually explicit conduct with a prepubescent girl.
that same month to email sexually explicit videos of young boys.
and a 
.
from the boy, which contained the texts, and was used as evidence.
