Amber had time

[MUST-SEE] David Hogg Meets His Match

David Hogg acts as if he is the voice of his entire generation… but is it true?

The student-turned-activist has become famous for his spiteful rants against NRA members and law-abiding Americans, even going so far as to declare that gun owners are “pathetic f***ers that want to keep killing our children.”

At the same time, he has lectured adults — you know, the people who actually vote and pay taxes — for not knowing how to “use a f***ing democracy,” and implied that teenagers were going to change gun laws.

...

Meet Elizabeth Najjar. Like David Hogg, she’s a high school student who is passionate and fired up about the gun control debate… but she’s taking a different approach.

So sad, so true.

WTH.... Punched in "When did Bush die?"and this came up. Need to put out in public. (Nesara ?) Joe

  This was emailed to me.. Freewill

 

April 1, 2015 by GM Admin

 

 

Former President George W. Bush Dead at 72 (10/05/18)

Policy Review, October 5, 2018—George W. Bush, the 43rd president of the United States, died today at Methodist Hospital in Houston, Texas. He was 72. The cause of death was announced as heart failure.

 

Mr. Bush’s always controversial presidency left behind a changed nation and a changed world. Taking office in 2001 after a disputed election settled only by a 5-4 decision by a bitterly divided Supreme Court, and decisively reelected in 2004, President Bush led the United States into four wars, oversaw the dismantling of Social Security and Medicare, and enforced a drastic shrinking of elementary, secondary, and collegiate education. He spearheaded the transformation of President Bill Clinton’s budget surpluses of 1999 and 2000 into permanent deficits of more than a trillion dollars a year, thus profoundly reducing the amount of capital available to address the needs of the vast majority of citizens and inhibiting the creation of new jobs with any promise of advancement or financial security, while at the same time pursuing tax reductions that increased the differences between the income and assets of, in his own terminology, “owners” and “pre-owners” of “the American ownership society” to extremes almost beyond measure. When he left office, taxation of personal and corporate incomes, while still legally extant, had been effectively replaced by a new payroll tax, so that almost all investment, inheritance, and interest income was left tax-free. “Those with the greatest stake in America,” President Bush often said throughout his second term, “have the greatest stake in defending it. Thus we as a nation must do all that we can to ensure that the commitment of those with the greatest stake to the rest of us, a commitment on which our freedom and security rests, only grows greater.”

 

Adding to Mr. Bush’s statutory and administrative economic policies were a series of decisions by the “Bush Court,” as the Supreme Court was known after 2005, when in that year Mr. Bush replaced three retiring members with very conservative justices (a fourth was replaced in 2006), depriving government regulation of corporations and the environment of any legal basis—decisions which many analysts considered more significant than the repudiation by the Bush Court of previous decisions upholding a woman’s right to privacy in the matter of abortion and certain applications of affirmative action. Even with the Bush Court seated, however, the Republican-controlled Congress that Mr. Bush enjoyed throughout his presidency repeatedly passed legislation removing issue after issue from the purview of the state and federal courts, including questions of freedom of speech, freedom of the press, the right to assemble, and the right to trial by jury. Despite these prohibitions of judicial review, the government, under Mr. Bush, did not press for any legislation curtailing what had previously been referred to as “First Amendment freedoms,” but simply refrained from challenging such legislation passed by many states, rather filing supportive briefs before the Supreme Court when such measures were contested. Ultimately the reversal of the series of 20th-century Supreme Court decisions subjecting the states to the Bill of Rights, long-sought by certain conservatives, was achieved not de jure but de facto. “The press is legally free,” the former New York Times columnist Frank Rich put it in 2007, writing in his online journal Thatsrichbrother.com. “It merely refrains from practicing freedom.” Some said the same of the nation as a whole; others said the country was freer than it had ever been.

 

Mr. Bush was born in New Haven, Connecticut, on July 6, 1946, and raised in Houston and Midland, Texas, where his father, the former President George H. W. Bush, began his careers in oil and politics. Mr. Bush attended Andover Academy and graduated from Yale University in 1968. During the Vietnam War he was a member of the Texas Air National Guard, known at the time as a safe haven from combat duty; whether Mr. Bush did in fact fulfill his military obligations became a subject of dispute during his second election campaign. In 1975 Mr. Bush graduated from Harvard Business School and began careers in oil and politics in Texas; neither flourished. Though he married the former Laura Welch in 1977 and fathered twin daughters Jenna (named for Mrs. Bush’s mother) and Barbara (named for Mr. Bush’s mother) in 1981, Mr. Bush’s life through his early 40s was characterized by business failures, accusations of insider trading, reports of silent bailouts, and self-confessed “drinking.” (Mr. Bush claimed to have renounced drinking—the word alcoholism was never used—the day after his 40th birthday, as the result of divine intervention and an act of will.) He became a public figure in 1989 when, through a questioned investment, he became part of the consortium that bought the Texas Rangers baseball franchise; his title as managing partner produced an impression of competence and good humor. In 1994 Mr. Bush ran for governor of Texas and proved himself a first-rate campaigner. When he was elected, Texas was a bipartisan state; as Mr. Bush’s advisor Karl Rove once said, “He charmed Democrats into riding on his strong back as he forded the river of discord.” When Mr. Bush left office as president, the Texas government was all Republican.

 

Mr. Bush was a politician opponents underestimated at their peril, and throughout his career his opponents did just that. He cultivated an aura of know-nothingness, of “a fine disregard” of inconvenient facts or opinions, but he was devastating on the attack, able to present himself as an ordinary man outraged by the self-superiority of whoever might be opposing him at any time and on any issue. Even as president, before the al Qaeda terrorist attacks on Washington, D.C., and New York City, in 2001, he was not always taken seriously by political commentators or the public at large; after that event he became a heroic figure, standing in defense of the United States as if that historic responsibility were his alone.

He launched an assault against Afghanistan, where al Qaeda had its headquarters and training grounds, weeks after the 2001 attacks, leading to the immediate fall of the totalitarian Islamic regime of the Taliban, which had given al Qaeda sanctuary. Though Osama bin Laden, the leader of the worldwide Islamist movement, escaped capture, his forces were severely weakened and scattered; during Mr. Bush’s first term there was, against all expectations and predictions, no further terrorist attack on American soil. Arguing that Saddam Hussein’s government in Iraq was a center of terrorist plotting and a repository of terrorist weaponry, from what turned out to be nonexistent chemical and biological arms to equally chimerical nuclear technology, Mr. Bush in 2003 led a limited international coalition into Iraq and replaced Mr. Hussein with an occupying force, which over the next year was pushed back into consistently shrinking enclaves in the face of a fierce insurgency. Following his reelection in 2004, Mr. Bush ordered the destruction of the cities where the insurgents were thought to be concentrated; though the cities were destroyed, the insurgency continued. Mr. Bush then pressed on to Iran and North Korea, which he had identified as “rogue states.”

 

With U.S. Armed Forces tied down in Iraq, Mr. Bush turned to what critics called a “private army subject to no law and operating at the whim of a single individual”—that is, to large numbers of private contractors employed by U. S., Serbian, Nigerian, and Saudi corporations—to launch land, sea, and air attacks meant to destroy nuclear facilities in both Iran and North Korea. While the Afghan and Iraqi armies and governments had collapsed almost at the first sign of American assault, the Iranian and North Korean invasions were beaten back by sustained resistance and, in North Korea, the use of explosives that Mr. Bush denounced as “tactical nuclear weapons,” though this was later proved not to be the case. 

Nonetheless Mr. Bush then ordered what he described as “pinpoint” nuclear attacks on the nuclear sites in Iran and North Korea, which, while achieving their goals, also led to the One-Day War, a nuclear exchange between India and Pakistan that left Bombay and Karachi in ruins and led to the fall of the governments of both countries, and to the withdrawal of the American-led coalition forces from Iraq. The result was the series of still-continuing civil wars throughout the Middle East and the Indian subcontinent that, while involving no unconventional weapons since 2006 have, according to the United Nations, caused the deaths of 12 million people and the displacement of millions more. Mr. Bush’s claim in action if not in words that the United States retained an international monopoly on the legitimate use of force left allies such as Great Britain and alliances such as NATO crippled; it also left the United States at least formally unchallenged.

 

It was often said, during Mr. Bush’s first term, that he saw himself as a messianic figure, ordained by God to carry the flag of freedom (“God’s gift,” in Mr. Bush’s words, “to every individual”) to the corners of the earth, and that the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq, at least, were part of a crusade of transcendent significance. After Mr. Bush’s reelection, it was increasingly argued that his wars were a diversionary and obfuscatory tactic meant to raise Mr. Bush’s standing, and the power of the Republican Party both in Congress and in the states, solely for the benefit of Mr. Bush’s domestic agenda, and that, as the poet Donald Hall wrote, “it was the United States itself that was the true object of conquest.” While that is a matter for history to settle (when, as Mr. Bush himself once put it, “we’ll all be dead”), few would dispute that Mr. Bush left the United States if not conquered then irrevocably changed—and, according to the American novelist Philip Roth, who in 2008, cited by the Swedish Academy as “the voice of a lost republic,” was awarded the Nobel Prize for literature, “less a nation governed by its citizenry, where each of us has one vote, than a stock exchange owned by its shareholders, according to the number of their shares.”

 

Mr. Bush’s Republican Party had, during his time in office, so effectively marginalized the opposition Democratic Party that it all but ceased to function in many states. After the suspension of the filibuster rule in the U.S. Senate, the remaining 45 Democratic senators were unable to block any of Mr. Bush’s appointments to the federal courts or the executive branch of government. The Republicans had so successfully supported Mr. Bush as an infallible and irreplaceable leader that he came to seem, in fact, irreplaceable. There was no figure in the party who did not appear diminished as soon as his or her name was mentioned alongside of his, and the notion of any ordinary Republican actually succeeding Mr. Bush became, in the words of William Kristol, editor of the conservative journal the Daily Standard, “unthinkable.” Thus was the strategy devised to introduce a constitutional amendment to remove the requirement in Article 1 that no one could be elected president were he or she not native born, supposedly to permit the presidential candidacy of the native-born Austrian Arnold Schwarzenegger, the enormously popular and skillful governor of California and the one Republican other than Mr. Bush who did sometimes appear larger than life. It later transpired that the amendment was a ruse: When Democrats attempted to “poison” the amendment by proposing that all restrictions on who might become president be removed (the requirement that a president be at least 35 years old, the two-term limit), the Republicans immediately acquiesced, and as a result of the passage of the 28th Amendment in 2006 and its ratification by the states the next year, in 2008 Mr. Bush announced his candidacy for a third term. He was overwhelmingly defeated that November by former President Bill Clinton.

 

Mr. Bush’s life after his presidency was marked by misfortune. He soon lost interest in his status as the standard-bearer of his party and its chief fundraiser; many believed he had again begun drinking, and in any case he seemed to spend most of his time at private clubs in Houston, where he established residence in 2010 after selling his property in Crawford, Texas. (“At least I won’t have to cut that f— brush again,” Mr. Bush was heard to say after his last election.) Then on May 1, 2011, Jenna and Barbara Bush were killed in a drunken driving accident in New York City, an incident that also took the lives of seven other people, four of them friends of the Bush daughters. Rumors that a Bush family friend attempted to bribe the police to report that a person other than Jenna or Barbara Bush was driving (the body of Barbara Bush was in the driver’s seat) were never confirmed. Four years later, in 2015, Laura Bush, like her father, died of Parkinson’s disease; she was 68. After a period of mourning, Mr. Bush announced that, to find his way back into “productive service” and “do God’s will,” he would welcome the opportunity to act as commissioner of baseball. But while Commissioner Bud Selig said that he would be honored to yield the position to Mr. Bush, he cautioned that the exigencies of the job would probably require him to remain in office “for another year, or maybe two,” and the question was not raised again.

 

Mr. Bush was preceded in death by his sister Robin Bush, his brothers John “Jeb” Bush, the former governor of Florida, Neil Bush, and Marvin Bush, and his sister Dorothy Bush Koch. He is survived by his parents.

Structure of the Original Government Being Restored Using the Example of The Republic of Texas

By Anna Von Reitz

Structure of the Original Government Being Restored

Using the Example of The Republic of Texas

First, our Constitution guarantees us a “republican form of government” --- “republican” = Latin, feminine, adjective. This is the form of government provided by the county level local government occupying the soil jurisdiction and is create when (and only when) people claim their birthright political status and join together to create a County Jural Assembly. Please note that our right to peaceably “assemble” is one of the guarantees of all three Constitutions.

So, that means people need to be claiming back their Good Names and Estates and returning --- or, the fancy legal term for the same thing---“re-conveying” your Trade Name to its natural permanent domicile on “land and soil of Texas” or another American state so that you can lawfully act as an Elector and Juror in an American Common Law Court and are lawfully enabled to exercise your right to peaceably assemble and create a County Jural Assembly.

Once you have your County Jural Assembly formed, and a minimum of 26 qualified jurors in your jury pool you can engage in a lawful election process – 30 day Public Notice of Nominations Meeting, closing of nominations, 30 day Public Notice of Election time and place, secure secret paper balloting, election of County Sheriff, Justice(s) of the Peace, Bailiff, Court Clerk, and Coroner.

As the head peacekeeping officer of the actual factual unincorporated County, the Sheriff so elected takes over as the senior and highest ranking Officer of the Law. He must be bonded for his performance of his duties (to protect him from damage claims) and must take the proper non-religious Oath of Office required (our actual government separates Church and State functions so there is no “so help me God” in the lawful Oath of Office). The Sheriff elected by the local County Jural Assembly is then enabled to deputize as many Deputies as needed to keep the peace. He also takes control of the operations of any and all Territorial and Municipal law enforcement agencies operating within his county.

Unlike the “Sheriffs” elected by incorporated Territorial “Counties”, the actual unincorporated County Sheriff is not obligated to kow-tow to any federal agencies that usurp upon his jurisdiction, which includes all local affairs, all non-delegated powers. Generally speaking this means that he rides herd on federal agents and agencies to make sure they are not over-stepping their boundaries and provides the “check” to ensure that things are kept in balance and that Territorial Sheriffs are addressing only Territorial Citizens and territorial issues, such as interstate sale of tobacco, guns, and alcohol.

People often ask why we have to elect County Coroners. We need County Coroners to keep the public records of deaths and probate actions initiated in the County Court, but we also need County Coroners because they are the ones who can impeach and remove a State Governor.

The counties all then come together and select three Deputies each to act as their Fiduciary Officers at the State Assembly level. This is where the State Republic (Latin, masculine, noun) comes into play, as in The Republic of Texas. Just as the Counties occupy the soil jurisdiction, the State Republics occupy the land jurisdiction.

Because our States are Nations, and our Nations are States in America, the words “interstate” and “international” are synonymous. Knowing that, it makes a lot more sense when I tell you that the land jurisdiction is international in nature. The Republic of Texas is responsible for doing the business of the soil jurisdiction people and counties with the rest of the world, including the other States. When the Republic of Texas elects three Delegates to attend a Congress of the States, we are talking about a Continental Congress of the kind that issued The Unanimous Declaration of Independence.

Thus, when we say “land and soil of Texas” we are referring to two related jurisdictions, local and international, occupied by the living people of Texas. The people occupying the land and soil of Texas are self-governing--- meaning that they have organized themselves and have established their own local and state national government to conduct their own business affairs.

Prior to 1851, the “state” created by a statewide assembly of County Deputies of the soil jurisdiction counties was indicated by the use of all small letters: texas, ohio, minnesota, and so on. These bodies are intended to hold the purse strings for the counties on statewide issues and sort out things like apportionments – for example, it would be unreasonable for a sparsely populated county out in West Texas to pay the same apportionment for roads as Dallas-Fort Worth, yet both counties have state roads that need to be maintained.

The international level land jurisdiction State was (and still is) distinguished by the use of a single capital letter in the name: Texas.

The Union formed by these States (Texas, Ohio, Minnesota….et alia) is known as The United States of America (Unincorporated) and please note that these States have never given up one iota of their land or soil jurisdiction.

So, the people delegate some of their power to the local County, the Counties delegate some of their power to the State and the State is a member of a Union of States doing business as The United States of America (Unincorporated) since September 9, 1776.

These States and their people have been at peace since 1814, when the Treaty of Ghent ended the War of 1812.

In view of all the war-mongering and death and destruction that has gone on since 1814, this must come as jaw-dropping news, or else as an absurdity worthy of a good laugh, but it is nonetheless true. So who or what has been doing all the fighting?

The States of States.

Notice there is a state called “texas” also known as The Republic of Texas that results when the soil jurisdiction counties come together in a statewide assembly. There is also a State called “Texas” that results when the counties send elected Fiduciary Deputies to a State Assembly.

So far we haven’t even touched on anything called “State of Texas” have we? That’s because so far, we have only been talking about soil and land jurisdiction states.

The States like Texas and Ohio have a Union called The United States of America which is, like the land jurisdiction States, unincorporated. These are the Sovereign States and the Union of Sovereign States, respectively. This is known as the Federation of States, formed by The Unanimous Declaration of Independence, and it has been this way since 1776.

However, there is another Union called the Confederation of States, that has been doing business almost as long (1781) under the auspices of The Articles of Confederation. This was--- and may be again ---a confederation of National-level States of States operated by the Sovereign States to do business in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

Without leaving its own habitation on the land, the sovereign State called Texas created The State of Texas to represent its interests and conduct its business in the international jurisdiction of the sea.

The State of Texas then joined with The State of Ohio and The State of Wisconsin, et alia, to form the States of America organization. These were all unincorporated businesses chartered by the sovereign States to conduct business, such as international trade, in their behalf.

As they were chartered directly by a sovereign land jurisdiction State to represent its interests, these States of States functioned at the National-level in the international jurisdiction of the sea --- as a counterpart to the States functioning at the National-level in the international jurisdiction of the land.

Texas is part of The United States of America union, The State of Texas is part of the States of America union.

As you can now see, The Republic of Texas derives from the statewide assembly of counties, Texas derives from a State Assembly of county delegates, and The State of Texas results from the Texas State Assembly doing business as The State of Texas. At least, that’s how it worked initially, and how it is supposed to work…..but something happened on the way to the Cotton Market in 1858.

The British Government and many British Peers had invested heavily in the Egyptian cotton industry, in more or less direct competition with American cotton producers --- and they were losing the contest, despite the fact that the Egyptian cotton was far closer to the European markets the British hoped to dominate. As a result, the American cotton producers had to be quashed and regulated so as to open up the European market for British-backed Egyptian cotton to take over---and the British Government and the Peerage to avoid a bath in red ink.

Not unreasonably, the American cotton producing States objected. The so-called “American Civil War” was the result. It had nothing to do with slavery. It was not a war. It was a commercial mercenary conflict staged on our shores by the British-backed Territorial Government against the dissenting members of the States of America, which sought to leave the original Confederation of States and form one of their own.

How do we know that this was never a “war”, but instead a private commercial mercenary conflict? There is no Declaration of War made by any Continental Congress, nor is there any such declaration by any properly seated and empowered National-level Congress of The States of States in Congress Assembled. There is also no Peace Treaty ending any such “war”. And we note that the so-called “Reconstruction Acts” treasonously imposed by the British-backed Territorial Government are still not repealed, providing evidence of ongoing unconstitutional British meddling in our affairs.

The Southern States operating their National-level States of States that were members of the States of America union formed under The Articles of Confederation sought to withdraw and create their own new union called, logically enough, The Confederate States of America.

The British Government was so bent on controlling both our commerce (business between incorporated entities) and dominating our international trade policies (business between unincorporated businesses) that after the hostilities ceased, they usurped against all our National-level States of States (North and South) and moth-balled them, pending their “Reconstruction”, and rolled over all their assets into State Land Trusts operated under names like the “Texas State”.

This gave the appearance that since our National-level States of States were no longer operating in the international jurisdiction of the sea, that our government as a whole was “in abeyance” and being “held in trust” pending “reconstruction”----- and that is how the perpetrators of this massive criminal fraud scheme have presented the situation to the rest of the world for the last 150 years.

They next imposed upon the sovereign States and engineered the writing of new “State Constitutions” which, undisclosed to the people, were not rewrites of the existing National-level State of State Constitutions, but were instead completely new constitutions allowing British-backed Territorial-level State of State organizations to take over and control everything.

The National-level States of States doing business as, for example, The State of Texas, were secretively replaced by Territorial-level States of States doing business as the State of Texas, etc. The names were deliberately and deceptively similar so that to Joe Average nothing appeared to have changed. There was a State of Texas doing business before the “war” and a State of Texas doing business afterward and they appeared to be the same, albeit one was authorized to act in behalf of the actual land jurisdiction State of the Union and one was a foreign, British-backed, unauthorized usurper.

This is in complete Breach of Trust, Fraud, and Violation of Commercial Contract, and it is what must now be addressed by the American People and the sovereign land jurisdiction States of the original unincorporated union of the States doing business as The United States of America.

The aim here is to restore and empower our “missing” National-level States of States to their rightful power and position, enabling them to act in behalf of the actual land jurisdiction States, re-vesting all assets held in the State Land Trusts back to the actual States and people.

That is, the assets held by the Texas State trust must be re-vested to Texas, and the original National-level State of State doing business as The State of Texas must re-vest to take over the bankrupt Territorial State of Texas and liquidated Municipal STATE OF TEXAS assets as the Priority Creditors and Holders in Due Course.

Both The United States of America (Unincorporated) --- the union of the sovereign States, and the sovereign land jurisdiction States individually--- are still operating and still standing peaceably on the land they are heir to. All assets of the Texas State belong to Texas and are not chattel backing the bankruptcy of any Territorial State of Texas or any Municipal STATE OF TEXAS presumed to exist. All assets of The State of Texas likewise belong to Texas despite immoral and despicable British meddling in our national affairs under conditions of Breach of Trust, deceit, fraud, and fraudulent claims of “war”.

And now that we have that clear, The United States of America (Unincorporated), the union of the sovereign States, is directing the international bankruptcy trustees to return the assets held in trust by the Territorial State of Texas and the Municipal STATE OF TEXAS back to Texas, while the people are busily restoring their county jural assemblies and The Republic of Texas, rightfully doing business as Texas and The State of Texas.

Our Government As It Is Supposed to Be:

People

Counties -- republican soil jurisdiction counties

Republics – national soil jurisdiction states – The Republic of Texas/Continental Congress

States – international land jurisdiction States – Texas/United States in Congress Assembled

The United States of America (Unincorporated) A Federation of Sovereign States

-------------------Land jurisdiction above this line, Sea jurisdiction below this line-----------------

The States of America (Unincorporated) A Confederation of Dependent States

States of States (National) owed: The Constitution for the united States of America***

The State of Texas/States of America in Congress Assembled***

States of States (Territorial) owed: The Constitution of the United States of America

(Territorial) State of Texas /United States of America Congress

States of States (Municipal) owed: The Constitution of the United States

STATE OF TEXAS/UNITED STATES CONGRESS

*** Indicates the “missing” National-level States of States, e.g. The State of Texas

Please also note that the soil jurisdiction Republics, like The Republic of Texas, form Continental Congresses when they meet.

The land jurisdiction States like Texas form the United States in Congress Assembled.

The National-level States of States, like The State of Texas, are supposed to form the States of America in Congress Assembled.

The Territorial “State of Texas” was never authorized to exist and neither was the Municipal “STATE OF TEXAS”.

They simply infringed upon our copyrights and usurped our lawful government while taking their paychecks from our pockets using semantic deceits and fraud under Breach of Trust and in violation of Commercial Contract.

 ---------------------------

See this article and over 900 others on Anna's website here: www.annavonreitz.com

This is what Really Is Happening

Corey Goode 2018
This is what Really Is Happening
Below Antarctica

WHAT YOU NEED TO KNOW

ABOUT PRESIDENT TRUMP

Recording of Anna speaking at Texas RT meeting

No audio for first 6 minutes.

The Texas RT guys cut Anna off short when she was just getting into the good stuff with the assemblies. They didn't understand jurisdictions and thought they were facing a challenge by another group instead of understanding the national level assembly has no jurisdiction within any state.

Direct download lnk: https://national-assembly.net/media/annavonreitzintexas.mp4

Right click on the link and "save link as" to save it to your computer. 938meg in size!

False Flag Operations...

Senator Exposes Syrian WMD False Flag; Says Hillary Ordered Murder Of Ch...

‘The Time Is NOW!’

Trump-Loving Pastor Just Issued 

Urgent Order To EVERY American Adult – 

‘The Time Is NOW!’

'DEMOCRACY' HIDES AMERICAN FASCISM video

'DEMOCRACY' HIDES 

AMERICAN FASCISM 
Apr 11, 2018

'DEMOCRACY' HIDES AMERICAN FASCISM

HOW 'DEMOCRACY' HIDES AMERICAN FASCISM


Bob Livingston
April 9 2018

Fascism operates the corporate state under the guise of democracy.



“The definition of fascism,” Benito Mussolini once stated, “is the marriage of corporation and state.” He also said, “Fascism should more appropriately be called corporatism because it is a merger of state and corporate power.”

The modern American state is fascist and not one bit less tyrannical than any form of modern or ancient totalitarianism. No, we don’t have the jack boots and the swastika. Our system is far advanced over that.

Our 2018 fascism is so advanced over Nazi Germany and fascist Italy of World War II that our system actually appears benevolent.

How could this happen? The answer is reverse semantics. Every writer and every commentator in America refers to the U.S. as a democracy of free enterprise capitalism with individual privacy and property rights. This is a big laugh to any sober person.

The American people believe that America is a democracy. The people believe that the United States is a representative democracy responsible to the people. In the public mind democracy equals human freedom. And once democracy separates the people from Christianity, then all supreme power lies with the state. 

All allegiance is to the state and all knees bow to Baal. They hear the word “democracy” all the time from the political class and the media class. The political 'elite' have imbedded the word “democracy” into the public psyche. It keeps the people imagining that they are free. 

Here again this brainwash is complete because everybody spouts it, and I mean everybody. This word is even an excuse for war as in Iraq and Syria. Hitler even called Nazi Germany a “great democracy.”

American “democracy” is a front for fascism as is any other country called democracy. The word 'democracy' is a key political word. Just see how many times you hear this word repeated each day.

A few years ago my wife and I took a trip to Mexico. We saw heavily armed guards in front of some businesses - for protection I presume. I am told that in Russia as well as many other countries heavily armed guards can be seen everywhere.

Why do we not see these armed guards in America? Does this suggest that our “democracy” has allowed us more freedom?

Not so, and I explain: We have said that so-called “democracy” is a code word to cover the American fascist state. I don’t know how many politicians understand this powerful word. I am sure that some, if not many, do understand, but few citizens do. Even very “intellectual” people don’t have a clue what they are doing when they use the word “democracy” to describe the U.S. system.

The word democracy is a very important word in psychological warfare of government against the people. Democracy as a concept of freedom has evolved over many decades. It is a code word to impress upon the people an imagination that they are free. It has worked unbelievably well! (To learn more about code words go to my articles Code words and More code words.)

If the people imagine that they are free, all sorts of crimes by the political system can be imposed, without protest, upon the people. It is an invisible armed guard. We don’t need armed guards because we are programmed with the word 'democracy'.

Mental democracy is a psychological weapon of the state that motivates the people to obey the system and to love the state. As George Orwell said in his book 1984, the people come to love Big Brother (the state). If we focus on this word 'democracy' as an organism, we can tie the visible to the invisible and thus reveal the subterfuge.

Democracy is an organism used to pacify the people. And what is an organism? An organism is a repetitive dogma that neutralizes the mind. Its purpose is to integrate the freedom concept of 'democracy' into the American psyche. It is not formal. It has no overt organization. It may function legally or illegally within the law or above the law. It is never identified as to its true name and purpose. It has no ethnic, social or legal connotation. It is powerful psychological warfare.

With this invisible organism, the American state has imposed all 10 planks of the Communist Manifesto without protest and invisible to the American people who imagine that they are free.

Following are the 10 planks of communism.......

1. Abolition of property in land and application of all rents of land to public purposes. (Private property rights are almost nonexistent today. You don’t own your property if it can be confiscated for non-payment of tribute to the king, or if a government agency  like the Environmental Protection Agency can arbitrarily tell you what you can and can’t do with it.)
2. A heavy progressive or graduated income tax. (Accomplished via the American tax system. Enforced via the Gestapo-like Internal Revenue Service.)
3. Abolition of all rights of inheritance. (Accomplished via the estate tax.)
4. Confiscation of the property of all emigrants and rebels. (Accomplished via rendition and drug laws allowing law enforcement to confiscate property if it is suspected of being used in the trade or manufacture of drugs — often without evidence.)
5. Centralization of credit in the hands of the state, by means of a national bank with state capital and an exclusive monopoly. (Accomplished via the Federal Reserve, which is not Federal and doesn’t hold “reserves.”)
6. Centralization of the means of communication and transport in the hands of the state. (Accomplished via the Federal Communications Commission and the regulated airline industry, Amtrak, public transportation and the regulated auto industry. Further attempts being made to seize more power through control of the internet.)
7. Extension of factories and instruments of production owned by the state; the bringing into cultivation of wastelands and the improvement of the soil, generally in accordance with a common plan. (Accomplished through price controls on the utilities via their government-supported monopolies and subsidies for favored industries.)
8. Equal liability of all to work. Establishment of industrial armies, especially for agriculture. (Industrial armies accomplished through regulations favoring/subsidizing unions.)
9. Combination of agriculture with manufacturing industries; gradual abolition of all the distinction between town and country by a more equable distribution of the populace over the country. (In progress via Agenda 21, “sustainable development” communities, etc.)
10. Free education for all children in public schools. Abolition of children’s factory labor in its present form. Combination of education with industrial production. (Accomplished via the public indoctrination system called public education under the control of the Federal government.)

These planks are supported by both major political parties.

Mussolini also said of his fascism, “We have buried the putrid corpse of liberty,” and that is likewise the goal of the American fascist politician and federal bureaucrat. Liberty necessarily perishes under collectivism, egalitarianism and government altruism.

Don’t get caught up in facile arguments about socialism or fascism, left wing or right wing. 'Democracy' equals fascism equals socialism equals communism. They are all top-down totalitarian and anathema to life and liberty and property.

https://personalliberty.com/democracy-hides-american-fascism/ 

Live stream Anna Von Reitz at Texas RT convention

https://livestream.com/ronavery/Reitz

What Obama Has Planned For US Neighborhoods

Woman HORRIFIED When She Overhears What Obama Has Planned For US Neighborhoods

Repost! Common Law Rebuttal from We THE People to the UNITED STATES CORPORATION’S public notice of the remarks on Syria

Common Law Rebuttal from We THE People to the UNITED STATES CORPORATION’S public notice of the remarks on Syria on September 10, 2013

Remarks by the President in Address to the Nation on Syria

Common Law Rebuttal of UNITED STATES CORPORATION’S public notice

To CEO Obama, the Crown, the Vatican, and the United Nations:

We THE People as the  de jure body politic established and according to the UNITED STATES CORPORATION’S own rules that a de jure assembly has superior lawfull standing to a de facto assembly, We THE People being of the de jure assembly do hereby formally rebut the UNITED STATES CORPORATION’s public notice of intended attack on the sovereign nation of Syria and are noticing you the de facto United States government also known as the UNITED STATES CORPORATION and all of your agents that we do not accept you proposal nor are we going to enter into contract with you on this endeavor by being silent.

We THE People are telling you with a resounding NO this proposed action is not acceptable and it will not be carried out. Just a reminder to all of you who work in, for or with the UNITED STATES CORPORATION; none of you de facto actors, agents and contractors have immunity from prosecution as of Apostolic Letter by the Pope and the Declaration of Contempt of the Constitution for the United States of America is now lawfull legislation.

You have been noticed by We THE People of the United States of America.

Notice to agent is notice to principal, notice to principal is notice to agent.

Comments to specific statements made by CEO Obama

To CEO Obama on your UNITED STATES Corporation's public notice to the people=Fictional Characters=14^th Amendment in the De Facto=UNITED STATES Corporation’s charter=mission statement=unlawfull=Constitution of the United States of America for their Consent to act unlawfully:

To the reader, please note, CEO Obama portrays the UNITED STATES as a government where it is a corporation.  With this said, CEO Obama requires consent from another Sovereign Nation in order to attack a Sovereign Nation like Syria.  In his speech he referenced both United States and United States of America.  There is a significant difference between these two.  United States is the reference to the UNITED STATES CORPORATION which is located on the 6.8 square miles known as the District of Columbia.  United States is not a Sovereign nation.  It being a private corporation is mere paperwork.  Now, the United States of America is referring to the Sovereign Nation of We THE People on the land of America.

Remember, We THE People who are the Lawfull Civilian Authority over the U.S. Military as the interim Constitutional Republic form of government operating under the United States Constitution 1789, Bill of Rights 1791 with the original 13th Amendment that prohibits persons who have accepted entitlements from foreign governments from holding public office is the true Sovereign Nation and lawfull form of government.

Thank you CEO Obama for recognizing the true De Jure Constitutional Republic form of Government.

Obama Statement: The question now is what the United States of America=reference to Union of States men and women=De Jure Constitutional Government asking CONSENT to their contract to move forward on attacking Syria and the international community, is prepared to do about it.

People's Response: We are not consenting to contract with you or give you our consent to move forward to attack Syria.  The international community is working with all parties to satisfy the issue at hand by lawfull international peacefull means. 

Obama Statement: And that is why, after careful deliberation, I determined that it is in the national security interests=profits of the United States=Corporation to respond to the Assad regime’s use of chemical weapons through a targeted military strike.

People's Response: You want to place another Central Bank in a country which does not have one; you want to loot the people of Syria of their precious antiquities and natural resources including

the natural gas pipeline; you want to place more debt on the backs of the middle class whom you state you want to eliminate; so there are two classes, YOURs and everyone else’s = poor.

Obama Statement: That's my judgment as Commander-in-Chief=CEO. But I’m also the President=CEO of the world’s oldest constitutional democracy.

People's Response: We THE People understand your statement however you fail to tell the rest of the story: 1) You claim to support a constitutional democracy but fail to mention in your claim the point that the Congress who was seated setting up the Act of 1871 was illegally seated in that session; 2) The Constitution you speak about is not the organic Constitution for the United States of America circa 1789 but the Charter or Mission statement for the UNITED STATES Corporation that requires the full reading into your unlawfull congress every 20 years to renew your Charter. The Charter is the Corporate Mission statement entered into and introduced as the Virginia Plan and was word-crafted to emulate the Constitution; 3) Your democracy would be the sheep's clothing over the wolf in this matter since the CEO of UNITED STATES Corporation or if you want President of the Constitution of the United States is in reality a Dictatorship or commonly referred to as an Oligarchy; 4) Your false presentation of three branches of government is so funny since the purpose of your Legislative body is to be the Board of Directors; your Executive branch is the seat of the Dictator while the Department of Justice reports directly to the President=CEO and the Crown=the city of London which=the Rothschild banking cartel . So, Mr. Obama, this is not a democracy as you would have us believe but an Oligarchy. This Oligarchy is packaged in a private corporation charter for profit. These fraudulent acts of non-disclosure of all the facts and tricking minors into adhesion contracts such as the birth certificate, social security number and drivers licenses has ensnared most of the population of the land into “voluntary” slavery to your territory of Washington District of Columbia.

Obama Statement: First, many of you have asked, won’t this put us on a slippery slope to another war? One man wrote to me that we are “still recovering from our involvement in Iraq.” A veteran put it more bluntly: “This nation is sick and tired of war.”

My answer is simple: I will not put American boots on the ground in Syria. I will not pursue an open-ended action like Iraq or Afghanistan. I will not pursue a prolonged air campaign like Libya or Kosovo. This would be a targeted strike to achieve a clear objective: deterring the use of chemical weapons, and degrading Assad’s capabilities.

People's Response: Mr. Obama, We THE People of the United States of America do not consent with your plan  to use drone warfare or any other type of warfare and we do not accept your contract.  Furthermore, your administration is known to We THE People of the United States of America and the International community at large to be the most prolific liars in the history of World.

Obama Statement: And our ally, Israel, can defend itself with overwhelming force, as well as the unshakeable support of the United States of America=Union States men and women.

People's Response: Once again CEO Obama, We THE People do not give our Consent to attack Syria or support Israel attacking Syria.

Obama Statement: My fellow Americans, for nearly seven decades, the United States = UNITED STATES Corporation has been the anchor of global security.

People's Response: CEO Obama, you tend not to tell the whole story. Did you forget that in the 1940‘s Bretton Woods Agreements Act and the Pan American Treaty, fraudulently and unlawfully turned the United States De Jure Department over to the United Nations to be used as the global peace keepers=war machine for the Vatican and the Crown. 

Obama Statement: Indeed, I’d ask every member of Congress = US Corporation Board of Directors, and those of you watching at home tonight, to view those videos of the attack, and then ask: What kind of world will we live in if the United States of America =asking the Union States men and women to give consent sees a dictator brazenly violate international law with poison gas, and we choose to look the other way?

People's Response: Where is your evidence CEO Obama of Mr. Assad’s knowledge and participation in this event? What Videos? Videos can be falsified, edited and/or complete fabrications. Why do you continue to promote false flag events?  An email from a U.S. Intelligence Officer got out on the internet that was sent to his wife showing his comments about the video. He indicated that these were actors and not one person was injured.  There is no evidence that Mr. Assad used chemical weapons on his own people. There are however, more indications that the chemical weapons were used by the rebel forces if any was used at all.

The Real United States of America will not consent to acts of aggression against another country based on such flimsy evidence and hearsay.

Interesting statement by you:

Thank you. God bless you. And God bless the United States of America…

People's Response: This is strange and is not congruent with the demonstrated character that has been in the public since you have been in office.

 - - - - End of Document - - - -

Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Was STAGED

Former UK Ambassador to Syria: Syrian Chemical Weapons Attack Was STAGED By Islamic Jihadi Propagandists, No One Actually Died

by George Washington

Wed, 04/11/2018 - 11:41

The former UK Ambassador to Syria, Peter Ford, told BBC Radio Scotland regarding the alleged Douma chemical weapons attack:

• The Syrian government is probably not guilty

• The sources claiming there was a chemical weapons attack are pro-Islamist jihadi propaganda outlets
• The incident was probably staged, and it is likely that no one actually died 
•  
• Former UK Ambassador to Syria: Douma Chemical Attack is staged 
• 
  

• Published on Apr 10, 2018
  Former UK ambassador to Syria, Peter Ford tells a BBC journalist and Western audiences to use their brains and think critically before falling into the propaganda of the Islamist jihadists.