Monday, November 12, 2018
Trump Moves Massive Arm Supplies To US From Europe At Same Time God Enacts Revenge On Satanic Hollywood Elites
Please feel free to share these newsletters. They are a product of Global Genius Trust www.ggtrust.com
what does it mean
November 12, 2018
Trump Moves Massive Arm Supplies To US From Europe At Same Time God Enacts Revenge On Satanic Hollywood Elites
By: Sorcha Faal, and as reported to her Western Subscribers
A captivating new Security Council (SC) report circulating in the Kremlin today noting the unlikelihood of President Putin and President Trump being able to meet at this month’s upcoming G-20 Summit in Argentina, states that Trump’s less than 24 hour appearance at this summit of world leaders comes at the same time his military forces are making a massive drawdown of war machines and arms from their Marine Corps Prepositioning Program-Norway (MCPP-N) and transferring them to the United States—a move some Security Council Members believe presages Trumpdeclaring Martial Law in America as it nears civil war—whose spiritual component of was just witnessed after a raft of godless Hollywood elites who ripped into Trump for his correctly pointing out that California is responsible for their State’s massive forest fires—most particularly because California refuses to cut down over 129 million dead trees in their forests—and in their doing so, earned God’s wrath with His sending fierce winds to drive these fires straight into their hedonistic mansions—and among whose multi-million properties were left in smoldering ruins include anti-Trump singers Miley Cyrus and Neil Young, along with famous anti-Trump actors Gerald Butler and Robin Thicke. [Note: Some words and/or phrases appearing in quotes in this report are English language approximations of Russian words/phrases having no exact counterpart.]
According to this report, one of the least reported, but most astounding statements President Trump has made in the past few weeks was that he was, indeed, fighting against evil—and in preparation for his facing off against, was evidenced in late September when US Marine forces began their largest deployment ever to the Nordic nation of Norway, whose top commander had previously warned that they should be prepared for the “bigass fight” to come—but none of whom participated in the NATO war exercise Trident Juncture 2018, with their, instead, being used to remove and transfer to the United States massive amounts of stockpiles from Marine Corps Prepositioning Program-Norway.
To why President Trump needs this massive reinforcement of weapons, ammunition and war machines in the United States, this report notes, he unmistakably made clear last month by his declaring that he was a nationalist intent upon protecting his own nation, not others—and whose actions sparked terror throughout the entire European Union to such an extent, French President Emmanuel Macron issued a warning that Europeans cannot be protected from America without a true European army—Macron rebuking Trump by saying nationalism is a betrayal of patriotism—Macron further calling on Europe to abandon the US Dollar—and French Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire openly declaring that it was time for Europe to become an Empire...Continue article here
Time for a new voting proposal...and more
Please feel free to share these newsletters. They are a product of Global Genius Trust www.ggtrust.com
TIME for a New Voting Proposal? Here is a "plausible" solution. Will it come to something like this to restore peace of mind and trust to the corruptible, manipulatable system we are witnessing? This would have to be better than the system we have now.... all be it, elderly, infirmed, disabled etc., would still need to have a confidence to know mail-in ballots would make it to the destination. You still have to TRUST the postal service not to deep six them along the way. As advanced as our technologies have evolved, one would THINK there is a fool-proof, fail-safe way to accomplish this. But I suppose as long as evil lurks in the hearts of mankind, corruption and debauchery will find a way.
Continue here: George Colgrove III ⭐️⭐️⭐️ on Twitter
Proposal:
• 1) Declare state of emergency
• 2) Set December 8, 2018 as new election date.
• 3) Require in-person voting
• 4) Require US Citizenship and ID
• 5) Dip finger in permanent purple ink
• 6) No media reporting any votes until the last precinct closes.
• 7) Cast ballots on ...
CIA Tapped Phones of Whistleblower, 2437
The Still Report
Broward County Staff Filled Out Blank Ballots, 2438
Trump Puts Gold Standard On the Table
The Post Journal
President Trump recently broached the subject of a gold standard for America’s monetary system, which is significant, because no recent president has done so, and the idea has been denigrated by central bankers, politicians, and other popular influencers as a “barbarous relic.” Such a standard, however, would be different from most caricatures made of it.
The monetary regime we have in place now is a fiat money system, “fiat” meaning simply a command or decree. In its essence, it is money created because government has decreed it into existence. Though it was previously linked to gold, it is now simply paper or electronic accounting entries. The dollar now has value as a money simply because it is widely accepted as a medium of exchange, but that is only so because competing currencies have been outlawed by legal tender laws...Continue article here
P.S. About Ram-Bubba.... and My Position Regarding Manna Trust
By Anna Von Reitz
P.S. About Ram-Bubba....and My Position Regarding Manna Trust
My
point is to shed light on the ridiculousness of claiming to be heirs to
ancient trusts that are--purportedly-- thousands of years old, and
claiming to be heirs of Ramses and heirs of Montezuma and and heirs of
Big King Put and Tut.
The
actual history is written in stone in Ten Mile Canyon, if anyone can
still read it and needs to know. But it doesn't matter.
Because
life goes on. People die, possessions are recycled, new generations
take over and make their mistakes and their good decisions, too.
What
we are left with is the present moment and the fact that some people
gained more than others by fraud and deceit, and others gained more than
others by hard work and diligence, and still others gained more than
others by sheer luck and blessing.
It's
not okay to universally hate and rob from rich people on the
presumption that they all got what they got by crime and cruelty. Some
of them did, but many of them didn't.
Why should the good suffer with the bad?
And
what kind of judge would I be to stand here and agree to some kind of
mindless pogrom against "the rich" any more than I should stand here and
agree with some mindless pogrom against "the poor"?
Each situation has to be considered on its merits for justice to be done.
We all know that, as inconvenient as that may be.
So,
no, I won't give a Green Light and Happy Happy to Kim Goguen seizing
5,000 private trusts that belong to families and organizations that
deposited those assets in Good Faith, and just letting her decide who
gets what.
These
are private property assets and if you disrespect someone else's
private property, you know what you can expect when it comes to your
own.
Securitization is Illegal and Unlawful
By Anna Von Reitz
Securitization is illegal and unlawful. And it has been the backbone of the world economy since 1934. Think about that.
I
have pointed out that securitization of a man's Good Name and Estate is
completely illegal and unlawful because it is an act of personage and
results in enslavement --- both of which are crimes.
And
here to discuss the point further is an excerpt from British
researchers published in 2010, with more explicit detail of exactly why
securitization, or, as the Brits write it, "securitisation" is illegal
in the U.S. and throughout most the world:
WHY SECURITISATION IS ILLEGAL UNDER U.S. AND COMMON LAW
Securitisation is illegal under US legislation – primarily because it is fraudulent and causes specific violations of R.I.C.O., usury, Antitrust and bankruptcy laws. And it flies in the face of public policy in numerous ways, as is expounded in extensive detail in an analysis to be published in our journal Economic Intelligence Review 2009Q1 (7) with several pages of book, article and case references.
To begin with, securitisation violates US State usury legislation. Secondly, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ as well as ‘assignment’ securitisations are essentially tax evasion schemes, and the penalties for tax evasion in the United States are excessively severe.
Thirdly, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, the conflict of interest inherent in the sponsor also serving as the servicer constitutes fraud and conversion. In the fourth place, in all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations where the Special Purpose Vehicle [SPV] is a trust, the declaration of trust is void, as it exists for an illegal purpose.
In the fifth place, off-balance sheet treatment of asset-backed securities (both for ‘true-sale’ and for assignment transactions) constitutes fraud.
Sixth, all ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations involve blatant fraudulent conveyances. In the seventh place, securitisation usurps United States bankruptcy laws and is accordingly illegal, as well as being also demonstrably contrary to public policy.
SECURITISATION ENTAILS GROSS VIOLATIONS OF R.I.C.O. STATUTES
In ‘true-sale’, ‘disguised loan’ and ‘assignment’ securitisations, there are fraudulent transactions which serve as ‘predicate acts’ under US Federal R.I.C.O. statutes.
The specific R.I.C.O. sections are: Section 1341 (mail fraud); Section 1343 (wire fraud); Section 1344 (financial institution fraud); Section 1957 (engaging in monetary transactions improperly derived from specified unlawful activity) [‘the money you make from the illegal exploitation of my money, is my money’]; and Section 1952 (racketeering).
Furthermore, securitisation constitutes violations of American antitrust statutes through market integration, syndicate collusion, price formation, vertical foreclosure, tying, price-fixing, predatory pricing, and the rigging of allocations.
Securitisation also involves void contracts, given the lack of consideration, illusory promises, the absence of any actual bargain, the absence of mutuality – and finally illegal subject matter and the contravention of public policy.
Securitisation is riddled with Fraudulent Transfer, Fraud in the Inducement, Fraud in Fact by Deceit, Theft by Deception (Fraudulent Concealment) and Fraudulent Conveyance: see the US securities regulations routinely breached in such activity, listed at the foot of this report and of most of these reports for THE PAST THREE YEARS, and other laws also routinely flouted in this context.
JFK Jr. Grave Mistake
operation disclosure
Published on Oct 29, 2018
My theory on JFK JR and family this video includes words to my original song which will be added next few days!! Please note in my haste to finish my video I believe the reveal is going to be at the Military Parade on November 22nd. Next video I will make sure I have looked over it twice!! Thank You all!!
Snake Plissken
Trump is going after a DEEPLY entrenched enemy that know every trick in the book. You can't tip them off, you can't make mistakes, you have to sway public opinion and gather evidence right under their noses, this takes time and patience. The victory lies in the preparation.
The Capper --- What ISN'T There 5.0
By Anna Von Reitz
We aren't "there".
Not even in the so-called Civil War.
Our
States and our lawful Federation of States doing business as The United
States of America were never involved in the Civil War. We were Third
Parties throughout. The entire action involved The Federal States of
States, not the States.
That is, the Civil War was fought over and by the Confederation of States, not the Federation of States.
Georgia never fought in the Civil War. The State of Georgia did.
Note
that it is the original Federal State of State --- "The State of
Georgia" we are talking about, not the Territorial franchise doing
business as "the State of Georgia" --which did not exist prior to the
Civil War. And should not have existed afterward.
Two different Unions. Two different jurisdictions. Two different populations.
And
they, Britain and Rome, knowingly came in here and pretended that we
were part of their mess and subject to their debt collections. They
"sponsored" their commercial mercenary conflict on our shores without
our participation or consent and then blamed us and billed us for it, as
if we were parties to any of this.
Then
they just continued their abuses and "presumptions" through the First
World War and the Second World War and all their endless warmongering
ever since.
It
had nothing to do with us, then or now, except that we have been
unconscionably presumed upon and imposed upon by the most obnoxious
guests --- pirates and con artists --- ever since.
So
all the miseries that have been visited on us as innocent Third Parties
being dis-served by treaty partners who owed us far better, are crimes.
Pure and simple. It has nothing to do with politics, though it does
have something to do with diplomacy --- or lack of it.
As
a Christian nation --- which we are, and they aren't --- we could
forgive them, but only if they repent and stop their reiteration of
crimes: put an end to false claims against our assets and our people,
properly discharge their duties and obligations, hand over the physical
assets and profits naturally belonging to our States and People and stop
interfering with and misrepresenting and imposing upon us.
The
United States of America is a unincorporated Federation of fifty noble
State republics, the lawful government of a generous and gallant and
peaceful people.
The
U.S. is a Confederation of States of States that went off track a long
time ago under the guidance of the British Monarchs and the Popes of
Rome and treasonous members of Congress.
The
original Confederation of Federal States of States disbanded in 1860
and the members, all Federal States of States, fought the Civil War. The
surviving Federal States of States entered a process of
"Reconstruction" that has never been completed. British Territorial
States of States usurped at this point and began a rampage of
criminality and Roman Municipal STATES OF STATES joined the fray.
Our
country has been in a crisis ever since because our Hired Help can't
obey their treaty obligations, the Public Law, or find their butts with
both hands.
Time to wake up, Virginia. And that includes the General Staff, the President, and members of Congress.
Sunday, November 11, 2018
What ISN'T There 4.0
By Anna Von Reitz
What ISN'T There 4.0
One of the things that "isn't" there is any conscious agreement by our Mothers or Fathers consenting to any of this.
The entire process is predicated on forcing unknowing women to sign away their children into lives of debt slavery, and doing it under color of law --- pretending that there is some mandate by their lawful government demanding this, while on the other side of their lying mouths, the miscreants responsible are claiming that this is all "voluntary".
It's not mandated by our government. It's not allowed by our government. It's against our Public Law and against the Geneva Conventions and against at least a dozen United Nations Declarations.
Maybe someone should inform the Government of Westminster what their American Bar Association and United States Bar Association members are doing here?
Oh, wait, we did that twenty years ago....
Maybe someone should tell the Roman Catholic Church?
Oh, wait, we did that twenty years ago, too....
Maybe someone should complain to the U.S. President?
Ah, yes, well, did that more than twenty years ago....
It's racketeering, identity theft, and credit theft on a vast international scale, carried out by private, for-profit governmental services corporations and members of the Bar Associations, and all supported by the treasonous and/or clueless Generals and Admirals of the U.S. Army and Navy and clerics of the Roman Catholic Church.
So let's look for some other missing elements.
Does anyone have a peace treaty ending the Second World War with Hungary or Bulgaria? No? Curiously, they are both named as "enemies" in the Trading with the Enemy Act and are the only parties that could still be considered "Enemies".
Which means, baldly, that these animals have been knowingly preying upon their friends and Allies in gross breach of trust and violation of their commercial contract obligations--- exactly as our Final Civil Judgment of 2014 finds.
It means that this is the thanks that we get for saving Britain's butt in World War II, and the thanks we get for our religious tolerance of the Roman Catholic Church, too.
So, Campers, are you inspired enough to sit down and write some nasty notes and take action to clean up this mess? Peaceful actions of course. They've only killed us on paper so far, so it's time to return the favor and take out the entire B.E.A.S.T. System.
What ISN'T There 3.0
By Anna Von Reitz
What ISN'T There 3.0
We
left off with the fact that FDR'S Banking Holiday has never ended, with
the affect that what we know as banks aren't really banks--- they are
deceptively operating under the names of old banks, but in fact they are
securities investment, trading, and holding companies.
We
briefly discussed how these "banks that aren't banks" have created
securities to trade by "securitizing" living people which is grossly
unlawful, and how they have profited themselves by false advertising and
undisclosed mortgage escrow practices.
So let's look at how they have contrived to do all this.
Go
back to the Trading with the Enemy Act and 50 USC 4307 (d) which allows
the "voluntary" donation of property belonging to parties who are not
enemies to the Alien Property Custodian (now the U.S. Attorney
General).
Now add that exactly such a
contract is "offered" to your Mother at the hospital under color of
law. She is coerced under false pretenses to sign a totally undisclosed
and repugnant contract donating her child as a ward of the British
Territorial State of State.
So, the U.S.
Attorney General takes the new "donation" and "enfranchises" it and
copyrights its Name. As a result, the Trade Name our parents gave us is
now "interpreted" as the name of a British Territorial Commonwealth
Public Trust, instead of the Trade Name of a living American.
All the assets attached to the Trade Name are now dumped into the Public Trust.
And
since Your Name is now registered as a Public Trust and no longer
recognized as the Name of a Living Man, it can be "securitized" --- so
they unlawfully convert Your Trade Name into the Name of a Public Trust,
and that then ends the prohibition against slavery and involuntary
peonage.
You can do whatever you want to do to a corporation. It's just a legal fiction after all.
What
they try to ignore is that the legal fiction is now attached to a
living man and a living man's assets, and they then act as Executors de
son Tort to administer and manipulate both the man and the assets via
the unlawful conversion of his American Trade Name to the name of a
British Commonwealth Public Trust.
This is a known crime called "personage".
It
gets worse. They don't stop there. The U.S. Attorney General then
spins off two more primary corporations under variations of your Trade
Name. There's a British Commonwealth Public Transmitting Utility
operating under Your Name in this form: Michael R. Doe and a Cestui Que
Vie Estate Trust operating under Your Name in the form: Michael Ransom
Doe.
Then
the Roman Catholic Church gets into the act and spins off its own
versions of corporate municipal franchises operating under your name.
And here, if possible, is where things take an even worse turn, because
they define "your" Municipal PERSON as a criminal.
And
under the 14th Amendment of the British Territorial United States
Constitution, criminals can be enslaved. And they can be subjected to
Bounty Hunting by the British Territorial Government and its assigns.
So
here you are, hapless Joe American, naturally an innocent Third Party,
being ruthlessly subjected to all this fraud and confidence crime by
foreign governments that are both under obligations public and private
to protect you and which are instead conniving to pillage and plunder
and enslave you.
Perhaps the only question in your mind right now is --- why isn't President Trump nuking Rome and London?
See the next article in this series.
What ISN'T There 2.0
By Anna Von Reitz
What ISN'T There 2.0
As
I have noted before, many of the most interesting discoveries in the
long bunny hole romp come from what ISN'T there.... that should be.
We
have discussed the missing Declaration of War related to the Civil War
and the lack of a Peace Treaty ending it. We have noted the lack of an
Executive Order ending FDR's "Bank Holiday" before, but let's examine
that a bit more. What does it mean?
What it means is that the banks we are familiar with aren't banks.
They are securities investment and holding companies.
And what have they "securitized" to promote their business and trade?
Securitization
is a process of assigning a value to an asset and then trading
certificates, stocks, bonds, mortgages and other "tokens" of ownership
interest.
As
our research into the Birth Certificate issue and our research into
Foreclosures has yielded, the "U.S. Attorney Generals" have
"securitized" the living people of this country and all our private
property, too.
But "securitizing" living people is against the law and is both illegal and unlawful, because doing so enslaves them.
Both the international law and the Public Law of this country very clearly forbids it.
Not
only is slavery forbidden, but since 1926, voluntary peonage is also
forbidden by Public Law. You can't volunteer yourself into indentured
servitude, even if you wanted to.
So
how is it possible that since 1934 America has been the site of a
booming slave industry based on "securitzing" living people and their
private property?
Answer:
FDR's Bank Holiday, which is still in effect. You are all challenged to
find any action anywhere rescinding or ending the so-called "Bank
Holiday" via Executive Order (by which it was created) or Congressional
Act or by any other means.
The
Bank Holiday ended "the normal course of business" in this country.
Imagine that you are playing a game of checkers, and without overtly
changing the playing pieces, the game is converted into a game of chess
instead ---- all without any fully disclosed explanation or warning?
That's what happened in 1934.
And
that is what is still going on today. We are led to believe that normal
business practices and procedures and assumptions apply, but in fact,
they don't.
When
these banks that aren't banks offer "home loans" what they are really
"offering" is that you "voluntarily" loan your home to them for their
benefit.
They
then conveniently create credit on an accounting ledger --- all out of
thin air, with nothing but the value of your home and labor at risk ---
and set up an escrow ACCOUNT in your Name, without telling you. They
charge you on average five times the value of any loan as interest and
demand an unearned security interest in your labor and assets on top of
it. Then, when you mysteriously fail to come forward and collect on the
escrow ACCOUNT (that you know nothing about) they declare the funds
"abandoned" and take all the mortgage payments that you paid to YOURSELF
for their profit, too.
Nice.
This
scam has been going on since 1934 and it still is. And that's just the
mortgage-foreclosure scam. It gets worse. Much worse.
See the next article for more.
For the Bar Members to See and Know--- And Everyone Else, Too
By Anna Von Reitz
For the Bar Members to See and Know--- And Everyone Else, Too
This is from a member of the Living Law Team a couple years ago. Read it, Bar Members, and weep.
The Role of Counselors-at—Law and The [unincorporated] Delaware Statutory Trusts
Remember when you were told you that you "had to have a Social Security Number"?
Sometimes, that is true, but only if you are applying for employment with the federal government. For of course, you would need it to enroll in their retirement and employee benefits program....but you don’t have to have one otherwise.
It is the same scenario with the Bar Associations telling new JD graduates that they have to have a Bar Card....again, that is true, if they want to be a prosecutor for the federal government corporations and their "federated state of state franchises" and become an employee of the court…………but not otherwise.
The fact is that there is no requirement for anyone to be a Bar Association Member to engage in the profession of law in this country and there never have been.
I challenge anyone anywhere to prove that there is any general requirement to be a Bar Member, in order to use the court facilities, present cases, or offer effective counsel to others with or without pay.
The fact is that the perpetuation of these "mandatory" Social Security enrollment and Bar Association Membership half-truths are undertaken in self-interest by undeclared foreign interests.
Research the Foreign Agents Registration Act (FARA) if you have doubts and also see Trinsey v. Pagliaro and the cases that Robert F. Kennedy fought pertaining to these very issues.
Happily, quite a number of some of the best minds working in the profession of law today have awakened to this realization and they are turning in their Bar cards and leaving the association to stew in its own juice.
This was precipitated as a direct result of Bar Associations kicking members out for committing the sin of actually defending and protecting their clients' best interest, as well as, a result of lawyers waking up and going, "OMG!" -- and exiting as fast as their feet would get them out the door.
The lawyers among us are waking up along with the rest of the populace and realizing that they have been sold a total bill of goods, and don’t have to spend their lives being professional “liars”.
The fact is, lawyers can function either as attorneys-at-law or as counselors-at-law. These are "capacities" within the profession in which a lawyer can choose to work, [just as you can choose to work in the capacity of a hotel manager or a hotel bartender and still be working in a hotel].
Attorneys join the Bar to gain group insurance and bonding benefits. [Also so their buddies in the fraternity will gang up on any outsiders].
Counselors pay their own insurance and bonds and otherwise don't have any reason to join the Bar, because they aren't involved in the disposition of public property or addressing issues related to public employees-- that is, they aren't working in administrative capacities as members of an administrative court.
Attorneys-at-law traditionally function as property managers involved in the administration of civil cases in Article I courts dealing with in-house legislative "laws" and statutes.
This is why those working in administrative courts supported by the United States Districts, the Territorial States of States, and the Municipal STATES OF STATES are all required to be "attorneys" and Bar Members by their employers.
Attorneys work in administrative tribunals. Not judicial courts.
This fact accounts for these frank admissions about the nature of the federal territorial and municipal courts and their various state-of-state franchises operating on our shores:
"There are no Judicial courts in America and there has not been since 1789, Judges do not enforce Statutes and Codes. Executive Administrators enforce Statues and Codes. There have not been any Judges in America since 1789. There have just been Administrators." FRC v. GE 281 US 464, Keller v. PE 261 US 428 1 Stat. 138-178.
"Courts are Administrative Tribunals" Clearfield Trust, et al v. United States 318 U.S. 363 (1943).
Counselors-at-law traditionally function in judicial court capacities and have the duty to protect and defend their living clientele, unlike their attorney-at-law brethren who are limited to dealing with public property and public employees and incorporated "things", either belonging to or working for or working with the government corporations.
Naturally, when a counselor-at-law appears a number of things are different about the nature and tenor of the proceedings:
A counselor-at-law is not required to enter an appearance prior to a court date and may simply walk in with a brief explanation to the judge that he or she is working in the capacity of a counselor-at-law and providing effective assistance to the Plaintiff or Defendant.
Often, to further clarify things, the judge will ask if the counselor-at-law is a member of the Bar Association…….If not, the proper response is simply, "I don't have a card (or more properly, a "ticket") with the Bar."
This is referring obliquely to the Bid Bond that the Bar Associations post in maritime cases involving incorporated entities, thus, further signaling to the judge that the Plaintiff or Defendant is appearing in the capacity of a living man or woman and that the court has to shift gears from international sea jurisdiction to international land jurisdiction.
The first difference for the court's notice when a counselor-at-law appears is the explicit revelation of the capacity in which the Plaintiff/Defendant is operating.
If he or she is operating in their actual, living capacity as a man or woman standing on the land jurisdiction of the United States, they are owed all their constitutional rights and guarantees including a counselor-at-law who can advise them but not "represent" them, because they are presumed to be free people above the age of twenty-one and competent to make their own decisions. That's why they have hired a counselor-at-law instead of an attorney.
That is also why they are forcing the court to engage them as people under the Public Law of the
United States or the General Session Law of the State instead of as "things" subject to the Private Administrative Law of any foreign territorial or municipal corporation or state of state or incorporated county franchise tribunal.
Attorneys represent "things" --- corporate franchises, wards of the state, bankrupt businesses, murdered victims of crime, mentally incompetent people, --all things that cannot "stand for" or answer for themselves. That is why they have to be "re-presented" by a substitute acting "for" them.
Counselors-at-law assist in presenting cases for living people.
Notice the difference: attorneys "represent" and administer the affairs of their clients often without regard for or even consulting with their clients. For example, they cut plea-bargains and waive rights and sell off property in whatever way best benefits the court.
This is because they work for the court and the client is at best considered a public trust subject to the court's administration. [And this is true whether you pay the traitor or not].
Notice that counselors-at-law "present" cases with and for their patrons, who administer their own affairs and make their own decisions throughout the proceedings, retain all their rights and prerogatives and do not willingly subject themselves to the court's administration.
Now, obviously, from the court's standpoint, it is very convenient to be able to dictate whatever happens in each and every case, so as to "administer" it as best suits the "public good" and the "good of the court" ---and the court's corporate employers, of course, without regard for any such niceties as equity owed to living people, or any rights owed to living people.
Just as obviously, it is a death knell to justice and an end to all freedom for living people to allow this state of affairs to go on.
When even the lawyers among us are so dumbed down and ignorant that they think the Bar Association has the power to obstruct them from pursuing their vocation, it's time to outlaw the Bar Associations, because they are clearly over-stepping any rational function or status that they have.
U.S. District, State of State and STATE OF STATE courts can demand whatever credentials they wish from people that they hire to represent their interests, just as other private and public interests can demand whatever credentials they desire from their employees.
If a "State of State" Legislature can pass a statutory "law" saying that all its court officials have to be Bar Association Members, our State Legislatures can just as easily pass a General Session law saying that none of our courts will allow Bar Association Members.
Take Note:
State of Wyoming is a Territorial Franchise Court. STATE OF WYOMING is a Municipal Franchise Court…………. Both of these are foreign corporation franchises like the local Target store.
They are limited to running administrative tribunals and they can require all the people in their "court system" to be Bar Association members until the cows come home, because these are private administrative tribunals.
But the Wyoming State Court belongs to the people of Wyoming and they run judicial courts of record that are superior to any private administrative tribunals and they can mandate that no Bar Association members are allowed to practice law in their venue ---thereby providing plenty of work for counselors-at-law.
That this great country and its people have been hoodwinked and pulled off course for so long by selfish private interests is an immense and horrifying Breach of Trust, but it is one that is being swiftly rectified, when we change/correct our own presumed political status and consequently change the "presumed" capacity in which we choose to act in court; while changing the capacity in which lawyers act.
To all former Bar Attorneys and those who are [currently] thinking seriously of tearing up their [fraud] cards?
It is time to face the truth and set yourselves free of the imaginary shackles that the Bar Associations have placed on you.
You can enter any court in this country in the capacity of a Counselor-at-Law and there is nothing any of the courts can say except, "Yes, of course...."
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)
