THERE
SEEMS TO BE A LOT OF CONFUSSION ABOUT EXECUTIVE ORDER #13303
|
Reply Quote
Printer
Friendly
|
|
|
ANALYSIS OF
EXECUTIVE ORDER 13303
When
George Bush stocked the US Treasury with Trillions of Iraqi Dinar in 2003, he
also signed an Executive Order protecting such from ANY KIND OF
ENCUMBRANCES (EO #13303), which Obama (who I am sure will try to
take credit for setting this all up) just extended through May 22, 2014. This
makes me believe that it will all be done by then... but what is the rest of
the story? (READ BELOW)
ORIGINAL EXECUTIVE ORDER 13303 (full text): http://georgewbush-whitehouse.archives.gov/news/releases/2003/05/print/20030522-15.html
IMPORTANT
PARTS OF E.O. 13303:
I, GEORGE
W. BUSH, President of the United States of America, find that the threat of
attachment or other judicial process against the
Development Fund for Iraq, Iraqi petroleum and petroleum products, and
interests therein, and proceeds, obligations, or any financial
instruments of any nature whatsoever arising from or
related to the sale or marketing thereof, and interests therein, obstructs
the orderly reconstruction of Iraq, the restoration and maintenance of peace
and security in the country, and the development of political,
administrative, and economic institutions in Iraq. This situation constitutes
an unusual and extraordinary threat to the national security and foreign
policy of the United States and I hereby declare a national emergency to deal
with that threat.
[He then goes on to exclude all the above from any judicial
process. I would contend that an argument could be made to also
include taxes of any kind]
Section 1.
Unless licensed or otherwise authorized pursuant to this order, any attachment,
judgment, decree, lien, execution, garnishment, or other judicial process is
prohibited, and shall be deemed
null and void, with
respect to the following:
[some text excluded]
(b) all
Iraqi petroleum and petroleum products, and interests therein, and proceeds,
obligations, or any financial instruments of any nature whatsoever
arising from or related to the sale or marketing thereof, and interests
therein, in
which any foreign country or a national thereof has any interest, that are in
the United States, that hereafter come within the United States, or that are or
hereafter come within the possession or control of United States persons.
[some text excluded]
[Who are "United States persons"? See Below]
Section 3.
For the purposes of this order:
(a) The
term "person" means an individual or entity;
(b) The
term "entity" means a partnership, association, trust, joint venture, corporation [or LLC], group,
subgroup, or other organization;
(c) The
term "United States person" means any United States citizen,
permanent resident alien, entity organized under the laws of the
United States or
any juris-diction within the United States (including foreign branches), or
any person in the United States;
SO,
IN MY VERY HUMBLE OPINION:
1. Executive Order 13303 essentially EXCLUDES all
of Iraq's currency (IQD) that is owned by a U.S. “person or entity” from ANY
kind of encumbrances (taxes).
[NOTE:
This only applies to the IQD, not to any other currencies. This MAY be the
reason why we have always been told to keep the IQD in a separate
account from any other currencies “for tax purposes”.]
2. THEREFORE, any IQD that “we” own as citizens of the United
States (or is owned by a trust or LLC) should be EXCLUDED from any taxes,
3. FURTHERMORE, this is a "currency exchange" not an
"investment" so "capital gains" taxes should not apply
either way. There is a tax on the books for "excessive exchange of
foreign currency" at a minimal rate (much lower than "capital
gains" or "ordinary income" would be),
4. HOWEVER, Executive Order 13303 should EXCLUDE the
IQD from any “currency exchange” tax also.
5. THEREFORE, it sounds like the IQD is EXCLUDED and
protected from ANY kind of withholding,tax, fee, garnishment, lien or
judgment under this provision, so any tax would be null and void and would
not be applicable.
6. Be very careful at your "CURRENCY EXCHANGE" to
never refer to it as "cashing out" or "selling an
investment". It is a "financial instrument" being exchanged
for US currency, so any kind of excessive fees, taxes, garnishments, etc.,
should fall under this exclusion.
NOTE: If your Dinar is held by your trust, it will
be exempt from any "gift taxes" when your trust
purchases a HOUSE, VEHICLE, EDUCATION, or any other asset for your children
(who are listed as beneficiaries of the trust).
SUBSEQUENT
EXECUTIVE ORDERS PERTAINING TO E.O. 13303:
1.
Executive Order 13315 of August 28, 2003,
2.
Executive Order 13350 of July 29, 2004,
3.
Executive Order 13364 of November 29, 2004,
4.
Executive Order 13438 of July 17, 2007.
OBAMA'S EXTENSION OF 13303 (till May, 22, 2014): http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2013/05/17/notice-continuation-national-emergency-respect-stabilization-iraq
So
here is the BIG CATCH 22:
If
the PTB continue to delay this PAST the May 22, 2014 extension,
then the possible ZERO TAX scenario outlined above would become “null and
void”. Therefore, all the people and “entities” who have exchanged prior to
the deadline, would be exempted from any tax, garnishments, fees, etc.
(including the Dinar held by all the corrupt Banksters and Politicians).
__________________
|
Wednesday, March 19, 2014
ANALYSIS OF EXECUTIVE ORDER 13303
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
5 comments:
I believe the above is null & void due to a new executive order dated May 27,2014. the section 1 has been terminated
http://reclaimdemocracy.org/executive-order-13303/
comments appreciated
You know that an executive order is an internal order within a particular office.
Yes and applies to Govt employees, but if is irrelevant why does Bush's Executive Order carry so much weight?
I'm missing something??
Yes, people's ignorance in accepting them with consent.
Here's something I found that could slow the process down.
http://rinf.com/alt-news/editorials/obamas-latest-scam-the-splitting-of-iraq/
Post a Comment