China’s complicity in building the Rockefeller New World Order, in their own words…
In my last entry, The Rockefeller Plan for the BRICS New World Order, in their own words, I laid out the Rockefeller Plan for the New World Order (NWO) as reflected in their official blueprint for it, a 1961 book titled Prospect for America. Given the reaction counters I saw for the article, I can tell that I need to explain things even further to reach certain people. So in this entry, I will continue to expose the globalist plot by pointing out how the Chinese government is assisting in the construction of the Rockefeller NWO.
To begin, let’s take a look at…
The Chinese Economic Propaganda Line
In the aftermath of the US Government “shutdown” of October 2013, I came across a very telling Xinhua article titled U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world. If you’re unfamiliar with the Xinhua News Agency, here is a little snippet from their Wikipedia page…
“The Xinhua News Agency is the state press agency of the People’s Republic of China. Xinhua is a ministry-level department subordinate to the State Council. Its president is a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.”
So the information put forth by Xinhua reflects the official propaganda line of the Chinese Communist Party, which makes what the article said all the more interesting. Here is what I wrote about it at the time…
It should be well known to all by now that the mainstream media, as well as the bulk of the alternative media, are attempting to portray a geopolitical conflict featuring the Anglo-American bankers & NATO on one side and the BRICS bankers & militaries on the other. The brings forward an obvious question: if China and their BRICS allies are really acting in opposition to the Western Establishment, why are they pointing to the Western globalist institutions as the solution to the world’s ills?
To help answer that question, let’s have a closer look at the institutions touted by the Chinese article…
1) The United Nations (UN) – According to the Rockefellers’ Prospect for America blueprint for world government, the United Nations is the international body that will exercise authority over regional groupings of the world’s nations. The institution itself was founded at the behest of the Western central banking families, and it was such a pet project of the Rockefellers that they decided where and how it would be built and provided the land on which it now stands.
The United Nations Headquarters complex “was constructed in stages with the core complex completed between 1948 and 1952. The Headquarters occupies a site beside the East River, on 17 acres of land purchased from the foremost New York real estate developer of the time, William Zeckendorf, Sr. Nelson Rockefeller arranged this purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan. The US$8.5 million (adjusted by inflation US$83.4 million) purchase was then funded by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated it to the city. Wallace Harrison, the personal architectural adviser for the Rockefeller family, and a prominent corporate architect, served as the Director of Planning for the United Nations Headquarters. His firm, Harrison and Abramovitz, oversaw the execution of the design.”
Upon clicking the link to the Wikipedia entry on Kykuit (the Rockefeller family estate), I found this extra bit of insight…
“In late 1946 two of [John D. Rockefeller] Junior’s sons, John D. 3rd and Laurance, each offered their respective residences, Rockwood Hall and Fieldwood Farm, as headquarters for the then newly formed United Nations. Family patriarch Junior vetoed the proposals as too isolated from Manhattan. He tasked second son, Nelson, to buy a 6.9-hectare (17-acre) site along the East River, subsequently donated for the construction of the UN Headquarters.”
Don’t you find it interesting that the location of the United Nations Headquarters was decided by an internal discussion amongst John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his sons?
2) The World Bank (WB) – Many people may be unaware that the World Bank is “a United Nations international financial institution that provides loans to developing countries for capital programs. The World Bank is a component of the World Bank Group, and a member of the United Nations Development Group.” It was created at the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944. And what was the formal name of the Bretton Woods Conference? The “United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.”
3) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) – The IMF was also a creation of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference of 1944. And like the World Bank Group, the IMF is a Specialized Agency of the United Nations.
Specialized Agencies are “autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the coordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for coordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level. Specialized agencies may or may not have been originally created by the United Nations, but they are incorporated into the United Nations System by the United Nations Economic and Social Council acting under Articles 57 and 63 of the United Nations Charter.”
So basically, the UN, WB and IMF are part of one giant globalist complex put in place by the Rockefellers and their affiliated global bankster families. Among the banking clans, the Rockefellers had a very prominent role in the creation of the global government because they were the family whose base nation (the US) emerged from World War 2 with the most wealth and power. The Rockefellers had the biggest tool at their disposal (America), so they wore that tool down to the nub to build the NWO. And this globalist complex is what the Chinese offer as the solution to the world’s problems (which also were created by the bankster families)?
With an overview of the globalist complex in place, let’s have a look at more of what the Chinese have been saying.
China’s Central Banker and the IMF
In the course of researching this article, I came across a link to a March 2009 speech by Zhou Xiaochuan…
…titled “Reform the International Monetary System.”
The speech was given during the depths of the 2007-2009 financial crisis and follows the globalists’ standard “let’s create a problem, then offer our solution” template. He begins by pointing to the problems posed by the (engineered) economic meltdown, then he goes on to explain how a new kind of global reserve currency would solve all those problems. Finally, he makes his recommendation…
“The scope of using the SDR should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the [IMF] member countries’ demand for a reserve currency.”
His recommendation for the gradual replacement of existing national reserve currencies with the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) is the same thing the Western banksters have been calling for since the SDR’s creation (see Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce).
Zhou’s speech is such a classic example of the problem / reaction / solution strategy that I recommend reading it in its entirety. If you find such speeches too dry and difficult to understand, though, I’ll provide an explanation of the key passages from the speech in Update 1 at the bottom of this article.
Governance changes will turn evil globalist institutions into good?
Bankster propagandists attempt to explain-away the BRICS Alliance’s adherence to the globalist institutions by making the argument that the Alliance is somehow outmaneuvering the Western elite and taking over the institutions from within. In fact, Zhou makes mention of “voice and representation reform” for the IMF in his speech, and he brings it up again in PDF page 4 of his International Monetary and Financial Committee statement from October 11 of this year…
This widely-parroted propaganda theme of instituting governance reforms to end the “unipolar” dominance of the global institutions by the United States and their Western allies would be convincing except for one thing: the Rockefeller propagandists are using the same talking points as the BRICS propagandists. Here is a portion of an article from Finance and Development Magazine (a quarterly publication of the IMF) titled “World Economy: Convergence, Interdependence, and Divergence” (from PDF page 16)…
This sounds an awful lot like what Zhou is saying, doesn’t it?
The section continues by spouting off the globalist buzzwords of “interdependent” and “multipolar,” then finishes with a one-line bio of the author…
So the author of this article is a high-level member of the Brookings Institution, an Establishment think tank headquartered on Embassy Row in Washington, D.C. And do you care to guess who funds the Brookings Institution?…
“In 1952, Robert Calkins succeeded Moulton as president of the Brookings Institution. He secured grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation that put the Institution on a strong financial basis. He reorganized the Institution around the Economic Studies, Government Studies, and Foreign Policy Programs.”
By the way, guess who else has ties to the Brookings Institution…
Given all we’ve seen in this entry and the last, which narrative do you find more likely to be true?
1) That the BRICS Alliance is real, and they’re seizing the globalist institutions from the hands of the “Anglo-American Banking Cabal” in order to stop the NWO?
…or…
2) That the BRICS Alliance is a public relations construct, and within the Worldwide Central Banking Cabal, they’re playing the role of the “solution bringers” who save the day from the “problem creators” in order to garner public acceptance of the NWO?
I’ll leave you to answer that for yourself…
But to help you make a more informed decision, my next entry will be on Russia’s complicity with the Rockefeller NWO.
To begin, let’s take a look at…
The Chinese Economic Propaganda Line
In the aftermath of the US Government “shutdown” of October 2013, I came across a very telling Xinhua article titled U.S. fiscal failure warrants a de-Americanized world. If you’re unfamiliar with the Xinhua News Agency, here is a little snippet from their Wikipedia page…
“The Xinhua News Agency is the state press agency of the People’s Republic of China. Xinhua is a ministry-level department subordinate to the State Council. Its president is a member of the Central Committee of the Communist Party of China.”
So the information put forth by Xinhua reflects the official propaganda line of the Chinese Communist Party, which makes what the article said all the more interesting. Here is what I wrote about it at the time…
It should be well known to all by now that the mainstream media, as well as the bulk of the alternative media, are attempting to portray a geopolitical conflict featuring the Anglo-American bankers & NATO on one side and the BRICS bankers & militaries on the other. The brings forward an obvious question: if China and their BRICS allies are really acting in opposition to the Western Establishment, why are they pointing to the Western globalist institutions as the solution to the world’s ills?
To help answer that question, let’s have a closer look at the institutions touted by the Chinese article…
1) The United Nations (UN) – According to the Rockefellers’ Prospect for America blueprint for world government, the United Nations is the international body that will exercise authority over regional groupings of the world’s nations. The institution itself was founded at the behest of the Western central banking families, and it was such a pet project of the Rockefellers that they decided where and how it would be built and provided the land on which it now stands.
The United Nations Headquarters complex “was constructed in stages with the core complex completed between 1948 and 1952. The Headquarters occupies a site beside the East River, on 17 acres of land purchased from the foremost New York real estate developer of the time, William Zeckendorf, Sr. Nelson Rockefeller arranged this purchase, after an initial offer to locate it on the Rockefeller family estate of Kykuit was rejected as being too isolated from Manhattan. The US$8.5 million (adjusted by inflation US$83.4 million) purchase was then funded by his father, John D. Rockefeller, Jr., who donated it to the city. Wallace Harrison, the personal architectural adviser for the Rockefeller family, and a prominent corporate architect, served as the Director of Planning for the United Nations Headquarters. His firm, Harrison and Abramovitz, oversaw the execution of the design.”
Upon clicking the link to the Wikipedia entry on Kykuit (the Rockefeller family estate), I found this extra bit of insight…
“In late 1946 two of [John D. Rockefeller] Junior’s sons, John D. 3rd and Laurance, each offered their respective residences, Rockwood Hall and Fieldwood Farm, as headquarters for the then newly formed United Nations. Family patriarch Junior vetoed the proposals as too isolated from Manhattan. He tasked second son, Nelson, to buy a 6.9-hectare (17-acre) site along the East River, subsequently donated for the construction of the UN Headquarters.”
Don’t you find it interesting that the location of the United Nations Headquarters was decided by an internal discussion amongst John D. Rockefeller Jr. and his sons?
2) The World Bank (WB) – Many people may be unaware that the World Bank is “a United Nations international financial institution that provides loans to developing countries for capital programs. The World Bank is a component of the World Bank Group, and a member of the United Nations Development Group.” It was created at the Bretton Woods Conference of 1944. And what was the formal name of the Bretton Woods Conference? The “United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference.”
3) The International Monetary Fund (IMF) – The IMF was also a creation of the United Nations Monetary and Financial Conference of 1944. And like the World Bank Group, the IMF is a Specialized Agency of the United Nations.
Specialized Agencies are “autonomous organizations working with the United Nations and each other through the coordinating machinery of the United Nations Economic and Social Council at the intergovernmental level, and through the Chief Executives Board for coordination (CEB) at the inter-secretariat level. Specialized agencies may or may not have been originally created by the United Nations, but they are incorporated into the United Nations System by the United Nations Economic and Social Council acting under Articles 57 and 63 of the United Nations Charter.”
So basically, the UN, WB and IMF are part of one giant globalist complex put in place by the Rockefellers and their affiliated global bankster families. Among the banking clans, the Rockefellers had a very prominent role in the creation of the global government because they were the family whose base nation (the US) emerged from World War 2 with the most wealth and power. The Rockefellers had the biggest tool at their disposal (America), so they wore that tool down to the nub to build the NWO. And this globalist complex is what the Chinese offer as the solution to the world’s problems (which also were created by the bankster families)?
With an overview of the globalist complex in place, let’s have a look at more of what the Chinese have been saying.
China’s Central Banker and the IMF
In the course of researching this article, I came across a link to a March 2009 speech by Zhou Xiaochuan…
…titled “Reform the International Monetary System.”
The speech was given during the depths of the 2007-2009 financial crisis and follows the globalists’ standard “let’s create a problem, then offer our solution” template. He begins by pointing to the problems posed by the (engineered) economic meltdown, then he goes on to explain how a new kind of global reserve currency would solve all those problems. Finally, he makes his recommendation…
“The scope of using the SDR should be broadened, so as to enable it to fully satisfy the [IMF] member countries’ demand for a reserve currency.”
His recommendation for the gradual replacement of existing national reserve currencies with the IMF’s Special Drawing Right (SDR) is the same thing the Western banksters have been calling for since the SDR’s creation (see Mainstream globalist propaganda reveals East/West conflict is a farce).
Zhou’s speech is such a classic example of the problem / reaction / solution strategy that I recommend reading it in its entirety. If you find such speeches too dry and difficult to understand, though, I’ll provide an explanation of the key passages from the speech in Update 1 at the bottom of this article.
Governance changes will turn evil globalist institutions into good?
Bankster propagandists attempt to explain-away the BRICS Alliance’s adherence to the globalist institutions by making the argument that the Alliance is somehow outmaneuvering the Western elite and taking over the institutions from within. In fact, Zhou makes mention of “voice and representation reform” for the IMF in his speech, and he brings it up again in PDF page 4 of his International Monetary and Financial Committee statement from October 11 of this year…
This widely-parroted propaganda theme of instituting governance reforms to end the “unipolar” dominance of the global institutions by the United States and their Western allies would be convincing except for one thing: the Rockefeller propagandists are using the same talking points as the BRICS propagandists. Here is a portion of an article from Finance and Development Magazine (a quarterly publication of the IMF) titled “World Economy: Convergence, Interdependence, and Divergence” (from PDF page 16)…
This sounds an awful lot like what Zhou is saying, doesn’t it?
The section continues by spouting off the globalist buzzwords of “interdependent” and “multipolar,” then finishes with a one-line bio of the author…
So the author of this article is a high-level member of the Brookings Institution, an Establishment think tank headquartered on Embassy Row in Washington, D.C. And do you care to guess who funds the Brookings Institution?…
“In 1952, Robert Calkins succeeded Moulton as president of the Brookings Institution. He secured grants from the Rockefeller Foundation and the Ford Foundation that put the Institution on a strong financial basis. He reorganized the Institution around the Economic Studies, Government Studies, and Foreign Policy Programs.”
By the way, guess who else has ties to the Brookings Institution…
Given all we’ve seen in this entry and the last, which narrative do you find more likely to be true?
1) That the BRICS Alliance is real, and they’re seizing the globalist institutions from the hands of the “Anglo-American Banking Cabal” in order to stop the NWO?
…or…
2) That the BRICS Alliance is a public relations construct, and within the Worldwide Central Banking Cabal, they’re playing the role of the “solution bringers” who save the day from the “problem creators” in order to garner public acceptance of the NWO?
I’ll leave you to answer that for yourself…
But to help you make a more informed decision, my next entry will be on Russia’s complicity with the Rockefeller NWO.
