I
was in the middle of working on an article covering real U.S. economic
stats versus manipulated statistics when the Charlie Hebdo shootings
took place. And though I knew the implications of the event would be
far-reaching, I was originally undeterred from my financial subject
matter. I had already covered in previous articles the inevitability of
ISIS attacks on Europe and America, including the “warnings” of Saudi
Arabia in August of last year that jihadists would target the EU within
months and the U.S. a month later.
In September of last year, ISIS publicly urged attacks on French and U.S. citizens.
I have also published extensive analysis on the
covert funding and training of ISIS militants by Saudi Arabia and
Western intelligence agencies, including my article “The Time Is Ripe
For A False Flag Attack On American Soil.”
The bottom line is the Paris attack was not
surprising in the slightest. I have no doubt whatsoever that such
attacks are going to increase in frequency, that the U.S. will be hit
soon, and that our government will do little to nothing to stop such
tragedies. However, a Reuters article titled “White House to hold global
security summit Feb (sic) 18: U.S. official” caught my eye. And after reading
it, I’m afraid I have to set aside my financial piece until next week
and break down the insanity that is now taking place in the world of
geopolitics.
It is clear by the language being used by the
political elite that the “global summit” called in the wake of the
Charlie Hebdo attacks is about far more than radical Islamic terrorism.
Set aside the fact that our government essentially created ISIS in order
to destabilize Syria. Set aside the fact that globalist middlemen like
John McCain and “former” covert ops goons like Gen. Paul Vallely have
met directly with groups like the Nusra Front that are providing support
for ISIS. Set aside the fact that Saudi Arabia has been openly
funneling cash and arms to Syrian terrorist factions tied to ISIS, and
realize that the mere existence of ISIS, regardless of its origins, is
being used as a rationale for the erasure of civil liberties and the
establishment of martial law on both sides of the Atlantic. Such
federalized reactions CANNOT be allowed to continue, regardless of the
threats each nation faces.
As far as the Reuters article is concerned, one
does not need to read very far between the lines to see the true message
being conveyed.
First, the focus of the summit is not
necessarily indicated as “Islamic terrorism.” In fact, the word
“terrorism” is barely mentioned. Now politicos are shifting their
language to the term “extremism,” which is far broader in its
implications. It should be noted that while the terrorist label has been
bandied about rather liberally by both the Bush and Obama
administrations, “extremism” offers greater cover for governments to
persecute or attack political opponents. A terrorist is generally
someone who initiates or at least plans a large-scale attack designed to
illicit a fear response in a population. An extremist, on the other
hand, could literally be anyone who holds views or initiates activism
outside acceptable forms of mainstream thought. Attorney General Eric
Holder did not use the words “terrorism” or “jihadist” in his
announcement of the global summit in February; he used the phrase
“violent extremism”:
We will bring together all of our allies to
discuss ways in which we can counteract this violent extremism that
exists around the world…
Throughout history, “violence,” according to
governments, is often attributed to ideas as well as actions. The point
is the change in vocabulary over to the extremist label is not
accidental or coincidental. The establishment is conditioning the public
to think in broad terms and to identify numerous groups as the enemy,
rather than focusing on radical Islam. As I have said for years, Islamic
terror is nothing but an advantageous excuse for governments to make
war on all of us. Do not forget, constitutionalists are often referred
to in the mainstream media and by Orwellian institutions like the
Department of Homeland Security as “extremists.” How long before we are
artificially linked as being suspect? How long before Charlie
Hebdo-style attacks come to the U.S.? How long before the liberty minded
are categorized as accessories to terrorism due to our
anti-corrupt-government philosophies?
It is disturbing to witness the lack of
conviction in principles in the average person. Self-proclaimed leftists
railed against the degeneration of civil liberties and constitutional
protections under George W. Bush, but rallied in support of the same
weakening of freedoms under Barack Obama. Self-proclaimed conservatives
today are shocked and infuriated by the trampling of the constitution
through executive orders displayed by the Obama administration. Yet, I
suspect that many of them will willingly jump on the fascist bandwagon
in the event of “Islamic” attacks on American soil. Neither side seems
to grasp the reality that the disruptions of liberty we enact in the
name of stopping jihadists today will eventually fall back on the rest
of us tomorrow.
The lockdown of the populace is already ramping
up. The EU is currently discussing the creation of a European Passenger
Name Record database (national ID database), meaning officials hope to
create a centralized database with a file on every single citizen. Think
the no-fly list is a terrifying concept? Wait until it becomes publicly
accepted for all web comments, Facebook posts, and blog posts to be
added to an ongoing record that determines whether you are allowed to
travel. Wait until it becomes a mainstream notion that every travel
destination you visit is tracked, recorded on permanent record, and
scrutinized by some pencil necked bureaucrat who then determines whether
or not you are suspect. Apparently, French officials are supportive of
the idea. And given the proclamations of “unity” surrounding the
upcoming summit, I suspect actions undertaken in Europe will eventually
be exported to the United States. Reuters reports:
French Interior Minister Bernard Cazeneuve said
after the meeting that European interior ministers had agreed to boost
cooperation in an effort to thwart further jihadist attacks.
“We all agree that we need to put in place
better control on certain passengers, on the basis of objective criteria
and with respect for fundamental liberties and without disrupting
cross-border travel,” he said.
He said Europe needed urgent progress in
establishing a European Passenger Name Record database, which would
facilitate the exchange of data about passengers between member states.
“We are convinced of the need for such a tool,
to follow those who travel to terrorist operating theaters or who return
from there,” he said, adding that this database would also be useful in
the fight against other serious crimes.
Much more here: Read More
1 comment:
What do you mean, when? They already are working hand in hand; they are one in the same.
Post a Comment