https://images.search.yahoo.
AVOID: "SMART APPLIANCES" -- TIED INTO SMART METERS AND CONTROLLING YOUR USE !!
AVOID: "SMART APPLIANCES" -- TIED INTO SMART METERS AND CONTROLLING YOUR USE !!
In The Union’s previous reporting on the proposal to ban electrical utility “smart meters”
in Nevada City, major parts of the relevant information are missing.
in Nevada City, major parts of the relevant information are missing.
The quoted PG&E spokeswoman’s attempt to pass the blame for the smart meters
program off to the CPUC is disingenuous as best; both these parties were in long-term,
probably illegal collusion to launch this program in California, as documented at http://www.healthfreedoms.org/
program off to the CPUC is disingenuous as best; both these parties were in long-term,
probably illegal collusion to launch this program in California, as documented at http://www.healthfreedoms.org/
One can’t rely on PG&E for accurate scientific information or on the California Council
on Science and Technology or even the American Cancer Society — and certainly not
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has refused to regulate use of
this low-frequency/Wi-Fi/microwave kind of radiation at all. Their loose standards only
apply to heat effects from high-frequency radiation.
on Science and Technology or even the American Cancer Society — and certainly not
the Federal Communications Commission (FCC), which has refused to regulate use of
this low-frequency/Wi-Fi/microwave kind of radiation at all. Their loose standards only
apply to heat effects from high-frequency radiation.
A thoughtful and well-informed reportage needs to keep in mind that the manufacture and
sale of the various devices that use and emit this kind of radiation is a more-than-a-trillion
-dollar-a-year business, and that the corporations involved have enormous wealth and power, including an unhealthy revolving-door-staff influence on the federal government organizations,
like the FCC, which are supposed to regulate the safety of their products for the public good
rather than corporate profit. The proposed exposure limits in the 2012 Bio-initiative Report
(designed to protect against the negative biological effects found in 67 key scientific studies)
are one million times lower than current FCC limits.
sale of the various devices that use and emit this kind of radiation is a more-than-a-trillion
-dollar-a-year business, and that the corporations involved have enormous wealth and power, including an unhealthy revolving-door-staff influence on the federal government organizations,
like the FCC, which are supposed to regulate the safety of their products for the public good
rather than corporate profit. The proposed exposure limits in the 2012 Bio-initiative Report
(designed to protect against the negative biological effects found in 67 key scientific studies)
are one million times lower than current FCC limits.
The fact is that there are many, many thousands (one estimate is more
than 20,000) of peer-reviewed, published scientific studies going back
to the 1970s that mostly demonstrate
a wide range of neurological and physiological damage from prolonged exposure to the kind
of low-frequency radiation generated by smart meters (especially the non-industry-funded
studies). These include not only various cancers, but single- and double-strand breaks in
cellular DNA, irreversible mitochondrial damage to DNA, other chromosomal aberrations and mutations (e.g., Down syndrome), lowering of male sperm count and motility, greater risk of miscarriages and fetal abnormalities, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier allowing potentially
toxic chemicals and proteins to enter the brain, altered brainwave and metabolic activity,
racing heart rate (tachycardia), damage to cellular membranes in the body (leading to cell
deaths), and causing red blood cells to leak hemoglobin, which can lead to heart disease or
kidney stones.
a wide range of neurological and physiological damage from prolonged exposure to the kind
of low-frequency radiation generated by smart meters (especially the non-industry-funded
studies). These include not only various cancers, but single- and double-strand breaks in
cellular DNA, irreversible mitochondrial damage to DNA, other chromosomal aberrations and mutations (e.g., Down syndrome), lowering of male sperm count and motility, greater risk of miscarriages and fetal abnormalities, breakdown of the blood-brain barrier allowing potentially
toxic chemicals and proteins to enter the brain, altered brainwave and metabolic activity,
racing heart rate (tachycardia), damage to cellular membranes in the body (leading to cell
deaths), and causing red blood cells to leak hemoglobin, which can lead to heart disease or
kidney stones.
It would be a progressive step if the Nevada City Council would agree to recognize the difficult truth of Wi-Fi radiation damage by banning the imposition of so-called smart meters in our homes and businesses.
These slower-acting effects are in addition to the more typical symptoms of the “lesser” but
more conscious symptoms that “electro-hypersensitive” (EHS) persons experience: fatigue, headaches/migraine, nose bleeds, difficulty concentrating, dizziness/nausea/vertigo, visual
and auditory distortion, anxiety, depression, memory loss, attention deficit, skin rash,
hyperactivity, night sweats, and insomnia. Children are more susceptible to all these effects
than adults. If readers (and doubters) look at just one of the many websites about this
problem, http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/, they will find much information as well as links
to a few thousand of these scientific studies.
more conscious symptoms that “electro-hypersensitive” (EHS) persons experience: fatigue, headaches/migraine, nose bleeds, difficulty concentrating, dizziness/nausea/vertigo, visual
and auditory distortion, anxiety, depression, memory loss, attention deficit, skin rash,
hyperactivity, night sweats, and insomnia. Children are more susceptible to all these effects
than adults. If readers (and doubters) look at just one of the many websites about this
problem, http://www.powerwatch.org.uk/, they will find much information as well as links
to a few thousand of these scientific studies.
One final usually unmentioned aspect I could mention is the role of the U.S. military.
Gong back to the 1970s there are more than 8,300 relevant scientific studies just by the
military, which hopes to (and by some accounts already has) weaponize this spectrum of
radiation. I could also mention a 2013 letter issued by the Board of the American Academy
of Environmental Medicine that referred to an Australian scientific study of 92 case series
that “clearly demonstrates adverse health effects in the human population from smart meter emissions.”
Gong back to the 1970s there are more than 8,300 relevant scientific studies just by the
military, which hopes to (and by some accounts already has) weaponize this spectrum of
radiation. I could also mention a 2013 letter issued by the Board of the American Academy
of Environmental Medicine that referred to an Australian scientific study of 92 case series
that “clearly demonstrates adverse health effects in the human population from smart meter emissions.”
It would be a progressive step if the Nevada City Council would agree to recognize the
difficult truth of Wi-Fi radiation damage by banning the imposition of so-called smart meters
in our homes and businesses.
difficult truth of Wi-Fi radiation damage by banning the imposition of so-called smart meters
in our homes and businesses.
2 comments:
Ban all smart meters from your town or....they will spy on you and everything you do..
I saw a story that talked about a large problem in Stockton, Cal. and another one in Capitola, Cal. where about 100 smart meters were blown off the wall of the homes they were attached to. I think its time to demand the CPUC drop the fees and allow people to go back to the old meters at no cost!
Post a Comment