Chuck Norris Calls on the States to Defy Obama
June 6, 2015 By Colleen Conley
There used to be a street named after Chuck Norris, but it was changed because nobody crosses Chuck Norris and lives.
Let’s
hope that the federal government doesn’t cross Chuck Norris, who is
really irked at the spendthrift ways in which Washington conducts our
business.
In
an article he wrote for WND, the legendary action star came out in
favor of an Article V constitutional convention, in which the states
could come out in force to finally control federal fiscal insanity.
Wrote Norris:
“Washington’s
out-of-control outlays remind me of the words of President Ronald
Reagan, who said, ‘We could say they spend money like drunken sailors,
but that would be unfair to drunken sailors. It would be unfair, because
the sailors are spending their own money. A constitutional balanced
budget amendment, or BBA, is not a new idea, and neither is the states’
push for such legislation.
“However,
what could be new to many Americans is just how close its enactment is
to becoming reality. Unknown to many, 25 states have already called for
the convention to add the BBA, and only nine more states (34 in total,
or two-thirds) are required to force the convention.”
Many
state legislators are fearful of a BBA because they fear “that it would
put the U.S. economy in further jeopardy during recessions or years
with lower federal revenue by forcing policymakers to cut spending,
raise taxes or both; hence, ultimately leading to higher deficits and a
weaker economy, or so they say.”
But
Washington’s current path of spending is unsustainable, and is a threat
to our national security. According to University of Colorado economist
Barry Poulson,“The Congressional Budget Office projects that under
current law over the next 25 years federal spending will increase to 36
percent of national income.”
Norris
believes, as do many economists, that we cannot ait any longer to rein
in our national spending. He wrote, “If we wait another decade to
constrain spending the task of balancing the federal budget becomes
insurmountable. By then the economy will be stagnating; and eliminating
deficits will require that federal spending be cut in half, something
that will never happen.”
Said the superstar,
“The window to stop and correct the economic chaos perpetuated by Washington is narrow and passing.”
“Without
intervention, Washington will spiral our economy to its point of no
return. All other solutions for economic federal restraint or solvency
have proven fruitless, despite the best of intentions of some.
“The
only way to save our posterity from inevitable economic peril is to
enact this BBA as soon as possible. There is no reasonable alternative.”
It’s
time for states to get on board with the BBA and call for a
Constitutional Convention. This is one of the reasons that the Founding
Fathers intended the states to wield most of the power in our nation,
with federal powers strictly enumerated in the Constitution. Washington
DC is a train set on a collision course; it is up to the people,
starting at the level of the states, to right our nation’s path to
economic sustainability.
1 comment:
Mr Norris is one amazing guy....... however, I'm not sure if the BBA is the best way to deal with it, and why would we think that the BBA will curb spending? what about the huge increase of Taxes with a BBA. Most of the states are almost broke.... and they wont mandate federal reductions because federal monies are states’ livelihood!
What about Congress? they have authority to raise taxes in spite of a BBA, and after a BBA.....
Who was it that said: “Single acts of tyranny may be ascribed to the accidental opinion of a day; but a series of oppressions, begun at a distinguished period, and pursued unalterably through every change of ministers, too plainly prove a deliberate systematical plan of reducing us to slavery.”.........Thomas Jefferson.
Perhaps there is no need for a BBA because ..............it spurns the very Constitution the states already ratified: states ALREADY possess the power to prevent federal excess and usurpation. States have NOT entirely ceded their sovereignty to the federal government. In fact, the continuation of our Constitution and our Republic requires states to assert themselves and to reject any act of Congress that goes beyond the very narrow scope of authority granted to it by the states in the first place, by the Constitution we already have. This is called ......" Nullification "
This is called Nullification and Recalling Elected Representatives who vote Unconstitutionally is the Rightful Remedy to unrestrained and unauthorized Congressional spending; state legislatures need to...................... ENFORCE THE CONSTITUTION, NOT AMEND IT.
Post a Comment