WCIT - and so it continues...

Jim Stone calls a false flag on this one. Scroll down to 8/27/15. Photos/video at link.

 

Jimstone.is - World Class Investigative Truth  http://82.221.129.208/ad1index.html

August 26 2015

Shooting on live news this morning in Virginia

UPDATE: I have watched the video from the shooter's perspective numerous times and somewhat suspect he was shooting blanks and this was a setup. If it is not, the odd lack of blood, body jerks and holes in clothing, which the video the shooter took ought to be clear enough to show will need some explaining. I'd also like an explanation for why there was no camera jerk in the video the shooter shot if he was holding and shooting a handgun that was firing real bullets. This was Alison's last day on the job, what better opportunity to do a B.S. shooter piece? During a newscast about safe tourism? The only sticking point is the shooter's twitter, which got expunged and is very convincing. If it was not true, why expunge it?

UPDATE: BUSTED AND SEWN UP WATER TIGHT, SCROLL DOWN TO MY CAPTURE OF HIS TWITTER AND FULL VIDEO THE SHOOTER MADE WHILE DOING THE SHOOTING!

ORIGINAL POST: A disgruntled news reporter shot up a news crew from his own news room during a live news feed during the broadcast this morning. You can bank on this hitting think tanks immediately and getting spun to fulfill agendas. With this particular shooting, the shooter made a video of himself doing the shooting (this is not the same video as the news posted) This ended up being a grudge shooting done by an employee who was ticked off at the reporter he shot.
UPDATE: This happened at a mall, AT 6:45 AM, before the mall opened. The shooter was a disgruntled reporter who knew where the news crew would be. IF WE DO NOT SEE THIS IN THE NEWS WELL, Who knows how they will spin it?

NOW THERE IS STORY DRIFT: Original story: Shooter was was a former reporter who got fired. Was arrested. That fits perfect. Now they are drifting it towards . . . . . a little foggy here, wait . . . . . nope, no arrest . . . . wait . . . .

SHOOTER POSTED VIDEO OF HIMSELF DOING THE SHOOTING.

UPDATE: THE VIDEO IS POSTED TO THE LEFT HERE. Was he shooting blanks? Your guess. I find it odd that such a frail girl on high heels was not knocked to kingdom come, and the gun did not significantly kick. I'd like an explanation for why there was absolutely no camera jerk during shooting when the shooter was holding the camera while shooting. This would indicate there were no bullets, only blanks. I think this is suspicious, I'll just make this video permanently available for the experts to dissect . . . . Hmm, she screams right through what would be bullet impacts yet there is absolutely no sound in her voice from getting hit, it just stays smooth . . . . . anyway . . . maybe it was a surprise for her so her reaction was real but a fake event staged with blanks? No visible holes in clothing, even after turning around? Should there not be an exit mess?

Because it shows clearly a black man doing a shooting (and having the audacity to film it in progress)as well as the fact it shows it all clearly enough to possibly prove it fake, this is getting expunged everywhere, so it is yet another video I have to issue directly from this web site. This can be saved by right clicking and saving.

STORY LINE: Shooter is a former reporter, who was black, and was pissed at Alison for making racist comments. He was posting to twitter on his account that existed long before the shooting (this was not a bogus twitter account) and then TWITTER DELETED THE ACCOUNT AFTER HE ONLY POSTED ABOUT THE SHOOTING FOR 8 MINUTES. If this is not real, I would wonder why they did that. TOO BAD FOR THEM, I HAD IT OPEN ON A TAB AND CAPTURED IT:

AAAAH, THEY DELETED HIS FACEBOOK WITHIN 8 MINUTES OF HIM POSTING TO TWITTER TOO!

Why would they delete his facebook and twitter within 8 minutes of him posting if this was not real? Perhaps compartmentalization of information prevented twitter and Facebook from knowing it was not real, if it was not real? Still sitting the fence, but I'd have expected the first person shooting video to look different . . . .
August 27 2015

BAM! TOTALLY IRREVOCABLY CONFIRMED FALSE FLAG: CHRIS HURST, A NEWS ANCHOR AT THE STATION, TWEETED THE SHOOTING 12 MINUTES BEFORE IT HAPPENED AND HE WAS NOT OUT OF TOWN, THE TIME STAMP IS FOR VIRGINIA!

Read it and weep HILLARY and all the other phonies who staged this!!!!

I'm calling it - Blanks fired!

They did a huge segment on this in the Mexican press, and used MY twitter captures off this very page and probably the video I posted. :-)
The reporter, Alison, thought it was a real shooting, she was not told it was blanks. So her reaction was real, but absolutely nothing happened. There is no way she would not have been knocked off her high heels, there was no body shudder when the bullets supposedly hit, no impact stutter in her voice as she screamed through two gun shots, no camera jerk from gun kick as the shooter fires and she runs away on high heels at full speed in perfect condition with no marks visible anywhere, on either side of her body while the shooter supposedly turns on the camera man.
I NEED AN EXPLANATION: The Mexican press clearly showed from all angles the type of camera the news reporter cameraman had. It was a modern high def 1080P broadcast camera in the $12,000 USD price range. IF THIS BE THE CASE, I'D LIKE AN EXPLANATION FOR WHY, EVEN ON THE MEXICAN TELEVISION, THE VIDEO SHOWN FROM THAT HIGH DEFINITION CAMERA WAS HIGHLY COMPRESSED 320x240 VIDEO with poor contrast and no clarity whatsoever. I thought the horrible resolution was from the web.
Now that I know that horrible resolution was intentional I don't buy any of it anymore, the Mexican press would have had better if it was available, and I have the explanation for why it is not available: Because the managers of this psy op have only provided horrible video quality to obscure the truth. If they showed all of this in the true high def that great camera no doubt captured it all with, it would be OBVIOUS no real bullets were fired.

After the segment on this shooting, they went into a huge extended segment on gun control, saying America needs a full gun ban to stop this type of thing from happening. THERE IS MOTIVE 1. MOTIVE 2: To provide chaff in the press while Hillary's espionage of 18,000 plus top secret documents gets run through the think tanks and polls to find out exactly how the lies have to be spun to not only save her, but to not spark outrage when they make her President. She's not finished, COUNT ON IT, they are going to psy op whitewash her espionage and turn it into a napkin drop over tea and crumpets. Usurpation of America's power structure by the one world elites will take care of any legal actions against her.

HA HA HA, look at this TURD, CHRIS HURST, WHO TWEETED THE SHOOTING BEFORE IT HAPPENED:

Pretty boy Chris says: "she was 'our bright, shining light' and it was cruelly extinguished by yet another crazy person with a gun". Umm dear Chris, it appears you have an agenda. If you feel this way, why not fake all this to get a gun ban through?
Look at his face - he's faking it, trying not to laugh. None of the pictures show a heart broken Chris! And OOH, he had a nice cute little photo album, A GIANT THREE INCH THICK PHOTO ALBUM all ready to go, at the station, so he could flaunt the sad sad love story to the world, ON CUE. Lovely.
And wouldn't you know - the "shooter" is now dead, to simplify it all, and the day of the shooting was Alison's last day as a reporter (scheduled ahead of time) so THAT explains, FOR REAL, why she won't be on the air there anymore! All just TOO PERFECT!
Logic: Chris was not her boyfriend. The photo album and all cutie shots were done ahead of time and all faked and staged for this grand event. Alison will go on to receive a huge payment of $600,000 dollars and cool off with Jessica Ghawi/Redfield enjoying "five swimming pools and a lake" for a few years, and then emerge a whole new gal. Cutie boy Chris will probably stay on the air after a huge 4 wheel drive romp in the back country in a brand new rig he bought with his payoff, girls included.