Military Tribunal Executions Destroy Evidence - WWII Nazis Destroyed America + Earth


 We The People See No Physical Hard Evidence of
Crime Syndicate Rule Being Dismantled.
No Evidence of Fear by Traitors
Trump Should Have Told Corporate Mercenaries To Cease & Desist Kidnappings For Victim-Less Crimes & Release of Victims for Corrupt Incarceration
Crime Syndicate Rule Persists, No Change in Weather
Rise Up Earth, Trump = Measure of Control
In The Matrix

Thursday, February 7, 2019

Tennessee may be about to take a huge step towards restoring constitutional courts

In today's courts, you are guilty until proven innocent regardless of the surface claims, PLUS the juries are not informed and are instead mis-informed and told to vote however the judges want them to, and that usually means to the letter of the law. If the juries are expected to agree with the judge, they might as well not be there at all. Tennessee is changing that. Take a look at an excerpt from some new proposed legislation (which is a return to the old way)
Sen. Frank Nicely (R-Strawberry Plains) filed Senate Bill (SB369) on Jan. 30. Rep. Martin Daniel (R-Knoxville) filed a companion bill (HB368) the following day. Under the proposed law, courts would be required to fully inform jurors of their rights at the request of a defendant̢۪s attorney using the following language. "If you have a reasonable doubt as to whether the state has proven any one (1) or more of the elements of the crime charged, you must find the defendant not guilty. However, if you find that the state has proven all the elements of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt, you should find the defendant guilty. Even if you find that the state has proven all of the elements of the offense charged beyond a reasonable doubt, you may still find that based upon the facts of this case, a guilty verdict will yield an unjust result, and you may find the defendant not guilty."

The bolded text is where it's at. This fits the original intentions of the courts to have the juries follow the spirit of the law, rather than the letter of the law. It is important to allow juries to temper the will of the state, and be the final voice as to whether or not a particular law should be applied in a particular case. It is the jury itself that should serve the purpose of squelching tyranny.


This new legislation proposal is the first time I have heard of anyone at the state level make a proposal to return the courts to functioning as they should. There is more on this topic HERE, they say it with more detail but my take on this is in agreement, and is based on an "old school" education from the public school system, which used to teach this. Clearly they don't anymore.
Jimstone

1 comment:

  1. random thoughts dude in a libraryFebruary 9, 2019 at 7:32 PM

    Still not moving there...

    ReplyDelete