Saturday, September 1, 2012

President Announces Open Season On Combat Veterans



By James Smith
1 Sept 2012
The White House Briefing Room released another Executive Order, this time to “help” veterans who may be suffering from mental health issues. And in doing so, adds to the government payroll future union members and drains on the American economy.
For Immediate Release                                                                      August 31, 2012

EXECUTIVE ORDER

IMPROVING ACCESS TO MENTAL HEALTH SERVICES FOR VETERANS, SERVICE MEMBERS, AND MILITARY FAMILIES

There have many stories on how veterans have been “helped” by the VA and other hospitals. It’s the kind of help no one wants.
Mr. Obama wants to see by the end of this year, a full 50% increase in Veteran Crisis Line employees. And the funny thing about governments, they want to see a return on investment. Even if they are running at a loss.
Further, veterans can let someone know they are having problems by using insecure means of communication such as phone texts and online chats.
Sec. 2.  Suicide Prevention.  (a)  By December 31, 2012, the Department of Veterans Affairs, in continued collaboration with the Department of Health and Human Services, shall expand the capacity of the Veterans Crisis Line by 50 percent to ensure that veterans have timely access, including by telephone, text, or online chat, to qualified, caring responders who can help address immediate crises and direct veterans to appropriate care.  Further, the Department of Veterans Affairs shall ensure that any veteran identifying him or herself as being in crisis connects with a mental health professional or trained mental health worker within 24 hours.  The Department of Veterans Affairs also shall expand the number of mental health professionals who are available to see veterans beyond traditional business hours.
The government will also being hiring 2,400 counselors and mental health professionals, many who would start at about $80k a year, and would pay off the new employees student loans to make this all happen. Student loans for such professionals would range between $150,000 to $200,00.
Sec. 4.  Expanded Department of Veterans Affairs Mental Health Services Staffing.  The Secretary of Veterans Affairs shall, by December 31, 2013, hire and train 800 peer to peer counselors to empower veterans to support other veterans and help meet mental health care needs.  In addition, the Secretary shall continue to use all appropriate tools, including collaborative arrangements with community based providers, pay setting authorities, loan repayment and scholarships, and partnerships with health care workforce training programs to accomplish the Department of Veterans Affairs’ goal of recruiting, hiring, and placing 1,600 mental health professionals by June 30, 2013.
But the real issue at hand here is one that is generated by the VA themselves, and not through the “moral weakness” of the veteran.
Suicide is a very serious issue. There are very few people who have not been affected by a suicide by a family member, friend, or acquaintance. But many suicides by veterans are preventable.
A 2004 study (Carr, Hoge, Gardner, & Potter, 2004) it was found by reviewing non official records, that 17% more military suicides, 4% more military deaths that were suspicious for suicide, than what was reported in the official records.  Deaths hidden to hide a serious problem.
And the media does not help the matter as well. A 2011 study (Edwards-Stewart, Kinn, June, & Fullerton, 2011) found that the media violated established guidelines in nearly all of the 240 reviewed stories from 15 different sources. Stories of suicides by US Service Members included “more pejorative language and discussion of failed psychological treatment. Conversely, civilian articles romanticized the victim and provided more details regarding the suicide.”
A 2012 Study  (Hyman, Ireland, Frost, & Cottrell, 2012) showed that: “Additional research needs to address the increasing rates of suicide in active duty personnel. This should include careful evaluation of suicide prevention programs and the possible increase in risk associated with SSRIs and other mental health drugs, as well as the possible impact of shorter deployments, age, mental health diagnoses, and relationship problems.” Emphasis added.
Feeding the veteran’s mental health problem, is the VA themselves. It has been reported since before 2006 those antidepressants, the “Go To” drug for suicide prevention, has caused people to commit suicide. The Food and Drug Administration noted in September 2004 that such drugs may increase suicidal thoughts or behaviors in children and teenagers. The human brain does not stop developing until middle age. Well within the age ranges to be affected by antidepressants provided after being discharged by the military and provided help by the VA.
The drugs on the list that have been shown to increase suicidal tendencies include:
Celexa (citalopram)
Effexor (venlafaxine)
Lexapro (escitalopram)
Luvox (fluvoxamine)
Paxil (paroxetine)
Prozac (fluoxetine)
Remeron (mirtazapine)
Serzone (nefazodone)
Wellbutrin, Zyban (bupropion)
Zoloft (sertraline)


Of these, only Lexapro, Luvox, and Serzone are not in the current VA drug formulary. Bupropion is the first line smoking cessation medication used by VA and civilian doctors as well.
Celexa has a dirty and questionable past. It was revealed in 2011 Forest Pharmaceuticals paid the principal investigator of a federally funded antidepressant drug study to fix the results in favor of Celexa.
But the most amazing part of all this, is the VA insistence that antidepressants are safe. From the study (Gibbons, Brown, Hur, Marcus, Bhaumik, & Mann, 2007):
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest that SSRI treatment has a protective effect in all adult age groups. They do not support the hypothesis that SSRI treatment places patients at greater risk of suicide.
The President wants to help veterans. The best way he can is to cancel this order, and demand that Veterans are provided more cognitive therapy and less medication. And leave office. That would do the most good.
Works Cited
Carr, J. R., Hoge, C. W., Gardner, J., & Potter, R. (2004). Suicide surveillance in the U.S. Military — reporting and classification biases in rate calculations. Suicide Life Threatening Behavior, 34(Autumn), pp. 233-41.
Edwards-Stewart, A., Kinn, J. T., June, J. D., & Fullerton, N. R. (2011). Military and civilian media coverage of suicide. Archive of Suicide Research, 15(4), pp. 304-312.
Gibbons, R. D., Brown, C. H., Hur, K., Marcus, S. M., Bhaumik, D. K., & Mann, J. J. (2007, July). Relationship Between Antidepressants and Suicide Attempts: An Analysis of the Veterans Health Administration Data Sets. The American Journal of Psychiatry, 164, pp. 1044-1049.
Hyman, J., Ireland, R., Frost, L., & Cottrell, L. (2012, Mar). Suicide incidence and risk factors in an active duty US military population. American Journal Of Public Health, pp. S138-46.

Guest suggestion for TruNews Radio Show - Former IRS Agent Sherry Peel Jackson


Rick,

I would like to offer a suggestion for a guest for your show.

I just listened to the regular Saturday morning radio show on Liberty Works Radio Network hosted by former IRS-CID Special Agent Joe Banister.

Joe’s guest this morning was Sherry Peel Jackson. Sherry is a native of Detroit, now living in Atlanta with her family. She is a committed Christian woman. She was a high school and college athlete, and majored in accounting in college. After working in public accounting, she joined the IRS and worked as an IRS agent for seven years. Feeling that her IRS work (including some covert assignments) were adversely affecting her family life, she resigned from the IRS to open her own small tax and accounting practice.

Through her tax clients she began hearing of problems with the legal status of the  income tax system as it is enforced by the IRS. She learned of a reward of $50,000 offered to anyone who could find the law that requires most American citizens to file income tax returns and pay income taxes. She conducted an extensive investigation, including inquiries to her contacts at the IRS, but she was unable to find the law in question. Accordingly, she stopped filing income tax returns.

She stated in her interview that she was directed by God to spread the word of her discovery concerning the income tax.

Eventually she was prosecuted by the IRS for income tax evasion. The charges were later reduced to “failure to file” and she was convicted on four misdemeanor charges relating to her unfiled income tax returns for the years 2000 to 2003. She was not allowed to introduce much of her evidence by a corrupt judge. While misdemeanor convictions normally result in short prison terms, if any, she was sentence to four years in federal prison. She was hauled away from the court, in front of her husband and children, in shackles and chains. She said that a comment made by the judge made it clear that she was being persecuted for exercising her First Amendment rights.

I won’t go into more detail here, but the story of her experiences in prison, how she dealt with the personal tests she encountered (including severe health issues that could have resulted in her death in prison), and the work she has done following release from prison, are fascinating and inspiring. Her latest projects are “Wake the People International Ministry” and “Titus 2 International Women’s Ministry”.

Sherry’s web sites:

Several recent interviews are posted here:





Thanks for the work you do in serving God.

D L


Neil Armstrong’s UFO Secret – Dr. Steven Greer


Neil Armstrong’s UFO Secret – Dr. Steven Greer

Neil Armstrong’s UFO Secret

By Dr Steven Greer – August 27, 2012
http://drgreersblog.disclosureproject.org/?author=5
Neil Armstrong, the first man to walk on the moon, passed away this weekend at age 82.
Many have asked if Armstrong took with him the secrets of what really happened during the famed 1969 Lunar Landing. Well, yes – and no.
Over the years, I have gotten to know a number of astronauts – and very close family members and friends of astronauts. As you may recall, my uncle was the senior project engineer for Grumman (now Northrop Grumman) that built the Lunar Module that landed on the moon in July of 1969.
The truth of that historic event has never been told. We did go to the moon – but the events that transpired were kept secret and officially remain secret to this day.
By the time we landed on the moon, the Lunar Orbiter had mapped the moon and imaged ancient as well as more recent structures on the moon. This has been confirmed by more than one witness ( http://disclosureproject.org/). So by the time we landed, the military and intelligence community – and a small compartment of operatives at NASA – knew that we may in fact encounter something very unusual there.
To prepare for this possibility, there was a time delay from the Lunar Module via an NSA (National Security Agency) uplink and other, alternative film footage was prepared to be shown in the event of something really unusual happening.
Well it happened. Close friends and very close family members of both Neil Armstrong and Buzz Aldrin have separately told me that indeed there were numerous, large UFOs around the crater where the Lunar Module landed and that these were seen by both Armstrong and Aldrin. I have also spoken to military officers that have seen the footage of this event – but it has never been made public. One close family member of Buzz Aldrin told me “It is not my place to out Buzz on this – someday if he can speak about it, he will…”
Neil Armstrong became somewhat of a recluse after the moon landing and rarely spoke of the historic event. His friends and family have told me that this is because he was a man of such integrity that he simply did not want to be put in a position to lie to the public about such a momentous encounter. How tragic that our heroes have been placed in this untenable situation!
When we were organizing The Disclosure Project a few years ago, I asked one of Neil Armstrong’s friends if Armstrong would come to Washington to brief members of Congress at the 1997 Congressional briefing we organized in April of that year. I was told that Armstrong wished he could – but that if he spoke about what really happened during the moon landing – Neil Armstrong, his wife, and children would all be killed. It was put to me this bluntly.
I found this to be unbelievable at the time, but since then have found that such threats and bullying by the over-reaching national security state is routine.  A very senior scientist at the Naval Research Labs in Washington DC recently told me and the Disclosure Project team that if he spoke about some of the information he knew, he, his wife, his children and grandchildren would all be killed.
This is no joke – and not a conspiracy theory. This is the way the highly secretive and fascist bosses in the deep black national security state operate. They make the Mafia look like choir boys.
In the meanwhile, we continue to applaud those courageous men and women who come forward, speak  the truth and move Disclosure forward. The world deserves to know that we are not alone, that intelligent life exists in the universe beyond Earth and that we have amazing new sciences and technologies that urgently need to be disclosed. This knowledge will give us a new civilization on earth, without poverty or pollution – and with justice for all.
The upcoming film Sirius will advance this cause – and it must. Please help us in this endeavor – go to Sirius.Neverendinglight.com – and join the thousands who are supporting the next big step in Disclosure, Peaceful Contact and New Energy.

WINNER! Tee Shirt of the YEAR!


In God We Trust!!!!

 

Hope you can see this ...  PRICELESS!  

Keshe Foundation Promo Intro Video.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Bta-0VbYJQ0&list=UU39CUrD95PjgXlU5BMmE9LA&feature=plcp

The Mysterious Case of Obama’s Identity



Thursday, 30 August 2012 10:00 Diana West


WASHINGTON, DC. (Dispatch International)


Why has the President spent millions to suppress his ID and who is he really?



“An investigation, undertaken by a so-called cold case posse working for Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Arizona, has now concluded that not one, but two Obama basic identity documents are, without a doubt, forgeries.”


As President Barack Obama completes four years in office and runs for re-election in November, a majority of Americans – 55% – believe he was born in the United States. However, 20% of Americans do not believe Obama was born in the US, while another 25% aren’t sure where he was born. Never before have so many Americans doubted the fundamental basis of their president’s identity. Why is this so?



On one level, the answer is easy given the absence of verifiable bona fides attesting to Obama’s life story, from every college record to every travel document, from every medical record to every legal writing to every law practice billing record to every record of his tenure as an Illinois state senator – and more. But the story has had to penetrate the American psyche in spite of a deep freeze on the topic in conventional channels. The Obama identity story, burning at the grass-roots-level for more than four years now, is consistently snuffed out and ignored by American journalists and the political class, from elected leaders to party officials. This silence is strictly non-partisan, and spans the political spectrum.

An investigation, undertaken by a so-called cold case posse working for Sheriff Joe Arpaio in Maricopa County, Arizona, has now concluded that not one but two Obama basic identity documents are, without a doubt, forgeries: 1) the computer file (pdf) of the 1961 birth certificate that appears on the White House website; and 2) the president’s 1980 military draft registration card released by the U.S. Selective Service Administration shortly before the 2008 election. These investigators maintain they can prove this in court.
The story of how they might do so is verboten, too. But somehow the saga doesn’t end up in George Orwell’s “memory hole”. This is due mainly to the irrepressible nature of the Internet.
It is here, for example, and not in the mainstream media, where, following the White House online release of Obama’s 1961 ”long-form” birth certificate on April 27, 2011, a small army of private individuals with varying degrees of technology expertise downloaded the document file and delved into the unexpectedly “unflattened” graphic composition “layers”. They submitted a series of computer forensics analyses to this online public square, arguing that the White House pdf had been fraudulently manipulated. Since that time, similar evidence has been methodically amassed and repeatedly tested under the auspices of Sheriff Arpaio’s cold case team.
Sheriff Arpaio formed this cold case posse after 250 local citizens asked him to determine whether Obama was eligible to appear on the Arizona presidential ballot in 2012.
On two occasions in 2012, the posse presented findings to the public. They concluded that the birth certificate on the White House website didn’t originate on a piece of paper but rather was created, or, more precisely, forged as an electronic file on a computer. As one Adobe expert and posse consultant put it: “The only time Obama’s long-form birth certificate image exists as a paper document is when a computer user selects Print from the File menu.”
At this point, the posse would like to turn over all of its evidence to Congress for a formal investigation. Like a hand grenade that could go off at any moment, however, such an investigation has no takers. And so the fuse burns on not one, but two potential constitutional crises.
One involves the biggest unsolved mystery in American history: If Arpaio’s findings are correct, who did it? The other potential crisis, while linked to the first, is much more transparent. The U.S. Constitution lays out three criteria for president and vice president. Article II, Section 1, requires that the president be at least 35 years of age, have lived 14 years in the United States, and be a “natural-born” citizen.
“Natural born” citizens are distinct from citizens who are native-born (born in the country) or naturalized. While native-born or naturalized citizen may hold any other office, only “natural born” citizens are eligible for the presidency, the idea being that America’s founders wanted to ensure that the chief executive had allegiance only to the American republic.
The Constitution doesn’t define “natural born”, but according to common law at the time and, later, the 1875 U.S. Supreme Court case “Minor v. Happersett”, a “natural born” citizen is understood to be someone born in the U.S. to citizen parents (plural). “Minor” spelled out this definition and is thus the signal case. It is remarkable that in mid-2008, as Barack Obama was clinching the presidential nomination, references to the “Minor” case inexplicably disappeared from 25 related U.S. Supreme Court decisions archived at Justia.com, a leading legal search engine popular with journalists and legal bloggers. Coincidence? When attorney and blogger Leo Donofrio, whose Obama eligibility challenge went all the way to the U.S. Supreme Court in December 2008 (dismissed), discovered this apparent tampering in 2011, Justia called it a “programming error”. The blogosphere called it “Justiagate”. The media, of course, said nothing at all.
So where does this leave the president, the son of a white American teen mother and a black British subject from Kenya? (Kenya became independent in 1963.)
According to his own story, Baby Obama came into the world with dual American-British citizenship. At the same time, however, there is, to date, zero verifiable evidence to be found of his Hawaiian birth; meanwhile there is circumstantial evidence of alternative nativities. For example, the personal biography Obama’s former literary agent used to promote Obama described him as “born in Kenya”. This biography, written in 1991, remained on the agency website until April 2007 – two months after then-Senator Obama announced his presidential run.
Other oddities include a missing week of immigration cards tracking American arrivals into Hawaii from abroad that should be in the national archives. Obama’s birthday in August 1961 falls in this missing week. In light of unexplained facts such as these, in light of the Obama documents that remain sealed, it’s really not so hard to see where a foreign nativity story comes from – or at least why a number of Americans are confused.
Many have heard about the two 1961 newspapers that published announcements of Obama’s birth. Posse investigators discovered that foreign-born children were similarly announced as Hawaiian births in these same papers, while they also found a set of adopted twins who were several years old before their “birth” announcements appeared.
Further complicating Obama’s citizenship story is an undisputed school record from Jakarta which identifies young Obama as a citizen of Indonesia.
With all of this in mind, it’s hard to stamp Obama “natural-born”. Still, no challenger to date has managed to convince an American court of this. Of course, almost every single case has been dismissed before trial.
Also worth noting is that almost every single case sought the same thing: the release of the Obama birth “long-form” birth certificate. This is the very document the White House website put on display in April 2011. Obama spent an estimated one to three million dollars to fight previous attempts to compel him to release this same document. What happened to make the president change his mind?
Two senior White House officials presided over the birth certificate’s unveiling at a pen-and-paper, off-camera, no audio-recording, press conference. One journalist in the pack pointed out, “some people are going to remain unconvinced”. He continued: “They’re going to say that this is just a photocopy of a piece of paper. You could have typed anything in there. Will the actual birth certificate be on display or viewable at any …”
The White House transcript breaks off with the word: “(laughter)”.
Who will get the last laugh? Barack Obama? Sheriff Arpaio? The politicians who keep their heads down, or the citizens who take their Constitution seriously? Whoever laughs last, it seems safe to say that the Obama birth certificate is a very funny document.



Source:


Princess Diana Assassination: 15 Years Of Lies, Spies And Cover-Ups


The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Princess Diana Assassination: 15 Years Of Lies, Spies And Cover-Ups
Posted By: Jordon [Send E-Mail]
Date: Saturday, 1-Sep-2012 08:21:01

.
Despite two separate inquiries and a Royal Inquest the evidence still says the truth has been obscured for the past 15 years by a smoke-screen of lies, spies and cover-ups…

Henri Paul’s Blood And A ‘Drink-Drive Accident’
This year marks the 15th anniversary of Princess Diana’s death, and despite two separate investigations – both of which manipulated evidence in support of the ‘drink-drive accident’ theory – and a Royal Inquest which at least found that Diana’s death was the result of ‘unlawful killing’ (but which fell woefully short of properly investigating allegations of ‘conspiracy to murder’), the evidence, when examined, still massively suggests the princess was assassinated.
Questions still remain regarding the veracity of Henri Paul’s blood test, for example – the very test on which the original ‘drink-drive’ verdict was based.
Why was the blood taken from the wrong part of the body? Why was it stored in a vial marked “unknown male”? Who was this “unknown male”? Why was it never DNA-tested to prove it belonged to Henri Paul?
And why was evidence given by Professor Peter Vanezis, Regis Professor of Forensic Medicine at Glasgow University, completely overlooked by the Royal Coroner?
Due to the excessive levels of carbon monoxide found in Henri Paul’s blood, Professor Vanezis, together with five other equally eminent forensic experts, concluded that: “The blood tested was not that of Henri Paul”. [Operation Paget Report, Page 323].
The 20.7% carbon monoxide level, they concurred, simply could not be explained, and suggested the blood must have been taken from another body at the morgue – most likely someone who committed suicide by inhaling car exhaust fumes.
Indeed, it is the only logical explanation as to how such excessive levels of carbon monoxide were found in the mystery blood sample.
The question is: Was the sample switched deliberately?
Read more: http://www.consciousape.com/2012/08/26/princess-diana-assassination-14-years-of-lies-spies-and-cover-ups/

Bill Gates Mansion - Free Download Presentation

http://www.mediafire.com/?2ask4a3k0213cwz

Check out Bill Gates mansion. Bill's cold personality clearly shows in this 'structure'. 

Jasmine the Greyhound


Subject: Jasmine the Greyhound

In 2003,  police in Warwickshire, England, opened a garden  shed and found a whimpering, cowering dog. The  dog had been locked in the shed and abandoned.  It was dirty and malnourished, and had quite  clearly been abused.

In an act  of kindness, the police took the dog, which was  a female greyhound, to the Nuneaton Warwickshire  Wildlife Sanctuary, which is run by a man named  Geoff Grewcock, and known as a haven for animals  abandoned, orphaned, or otherwise in  need. 

Geoff and  the other sanctuary staff went to work with two  aims: to restore the dog to full health, and to  win her trust. It took several weeks, but  eventually both goals were achieved. They named  her Jasmine, and they started to think about  finding her an adoptive home. 
  
Jasmine,  however, had other ideas. No one quite remembers  how it came about, but Jasmine started welcoming  all animal arrivals at the sanctuary. It would  not matter if it were a puppy, a fox cub, a  rabbit or, any other lost or hurting animal.  Jasmine would just peer into the box or cage  and, when and where possible, deliver a  welcoming lick. 

 
  Geoff  relates one of the early incidents. "We had two  puppies that had been abandoned by a nearby  railway line. One was a Lakeland Terrier cross  and another was a Jack Russell Doberman cross.  They were tiny when they arrived at the center,  and Jasmine approached them and grabbed one by  the scruff of the neck in her mouth and put him  on the settee. Then she fetched the other one  and sat down with them, cuddling them."


"But she  is like that with all of our animals, even the  rabbits. She takes all the stress out of them,  and it helps them to not only feel close to her,  but to settle into their new surroundings. She  has done the same with the fox and badger cubs,  she licks the rabbits and guinea pigs, and even  lets the birds perch on the bridge of her  nose." 

 
  Jasmine,  the timid, abused, deserted waif, became the  animal sanctuary's resident surrogate mother, a  role for which she might have been born. The  list of orphaned and abandoned youngsters she  has cared for comprises five fox cubs, four  badger cubs, fifteen chicks, eight guinea pigs,  two stray puppies and fifteen rabbits - and one  roe deer fawn. Tiny Bramble, eleven weeks old,  was found semi-conscious in a field. Upon  arrival at the sanctuary, Jasmine cuddled up to  her to keep her warm, and then went into the  full foster-mum role. Jasmine the greyhound  showers Bramble the roe deer with affection, and  makes sure nothing is matted. 

  
  "They are  inseparable," says Geoff. "Bramble walks between  her legs, and they keep kissing each other. They  walk together round the sanctuary. It's a real  treat to see them." 

 
  Jasmine  will continue to care for Bramble until she is  old enough to be returned to woodland life. When  that happens, Jasmine will not be lonely. She  will be too busy showering love and affection on  the next orphan or victim of abuse. 
  Pictured  from the left are: "Toby," a stray Lakeland dog;  "Bramble," orphaned roe deer; "Buster," a stray  Jack Russell; a dumped rabbit; "Sky," an injured  barn owl; and "Jasmine," with a mother's heart  doing best what a caring mother would do... and  such is the order of God's Creation...  
  
Please  pass this along, and maybe make someone else's  day just a little brighter!

THE $27.5 TRILLION DOLLAR MAN FINALLY SPEAKS

http://www.nwo3.com/index.php/19-the-27-5-trillion-man?showall=&limitstart