Sunday, April 27, 2014

Study: Nearly 5 million elderly go hungry in US

2014-04-27

Study: Nearly 5 million elderly go hungry in US

Vatic Note:   It has come to my attention that all elderly and "permanently handicapped"  have had their food stamps cut down to $15 per months, in order to provide food stamps to the illegal immigrants coming into our country.   What we are seeing here is an excellent example of what we can expect in a global One World Order. This is "EUGENICS" that was criminalize in the 1920's when the robber barons first tried to get public acceptance of the concept of "killing off the useless feeders"  which would be the seniors and permanently handicapped that are not productive slaves within the system.  So starve them to death.

This is a shift by our "foreign infiltrated and occupied government" from a sovereign nation willing to take care of its poor elderly and permanently handicapped who spent their lives helping build the nation into what it was today,  into a "global government" determined to rid the planet of her so called elderly and disabled
"useless feeders" (what is good for the individual) in favor of the more productive younger slave workers (what is good for society, which really means "What is good for the fascists pocket book and profits" GMO is the same thing.  You eat the food that kills slowly, work til you are 40 and then drop dead from organ failure and they don't have to support you then.  They can then steal your retirement accounts since you are already dead.  Pond scum! ).

That was written up by Rahm Emanuals brother, Ezekiel, (Obama's appt to the Obamacare board) on Eugenics, which was about trading in our national culture of valuing individual life, for  a new cultural perspective, of "What is valuable for society".  Even that is a  lie,  He really meant "What is valuable for the Corporate fascist grinding machine."

What this article shows us is that shift in real terms without all the window dressing.  It means intentionally killing off all useless feeders (Except the "useless feeder elites").  What got to me is the cruel way they chose to rid the planet of these people.  Starving them to death is one of the cruelest and least humane of all the choices they had.

Its a cruel and inhumane act to "tell these elderly" that after following the rules and playing the game as demanded, they are now no longer wanted and to "hurry up and die".  I can't imagine how horrible that must feel after all those years of giving, paying and contributing.

What a reward for doing right all your life based on societies values at the time.  These people occupying our government and running it into the ground, are totally incompetent to run a laundrymat much less something as serious as a government.

Study: Nearly 5 million elderly go hungry in US
http://www.presstv.com/detail/2014/04/25/359988/nearly-5-million-elderly-go-hungry-in-us/
By Press TV,  April 25, 2014

                                                         
Nearly 5 million senior citizens above the age of 60 in the United States suffer from food insecurity and go hungry due to financial strains, a shocking study has revealed.
"In 2011, 8.35 percent of Americans over age 60 faced the threat of hunger - that translates to 4.8 million people," Craig Gundersen, a professor at the University of Illinois, said.

These seniors who are dealing with hunger experience negative health outcomes, according to the study that used data from the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES).

Due to inadequate access to food, seniors end up consuming fewer calories, vitamins and other essential nutrients, becoming vulnerable to an array of ailments.

"Seniors who are food insecure reported higher incidence of diabetes, high cholesterol, high blood pressure, heart attack, gum disease, and a host of other health problems than adults their age who are food secure," Gundersen said. "In addition, food-insecure seniors have worse general health outcomes, more daily activity limitations, and are more likely to suffer from depression.”

The presence of grandchildren at home also impacts food insecurity of the elderly, said the study.

"Food insecurity rates among seniors were almost three times as high if grandchildren were present in the home in comparison to homes without grandchildren present," Gundersen said.

Hunger and its serious health consequences are one of the most formidable public health challenges facing the United States today, particularly among older people.

According AARP, nearly 9 million Americans over age 50 are at risk of hunger every day, a staggering 79 percent increase since 2001.

The recession has made the hunger problem much worse, particularly among older people 50-59 who are usually too young for Social Security and Medicare and too old for programs that help families with children.

The article is reproduced in accordance with Section 107 of title 17 of the Copyright Law of the United States relating to fair-use and is for the purposes of criticism, comment, news reporting, teaching, scholarship, and research.
Posted by Vatic Master


Obama and Putin Playing Out World War III Script Written by Banksters

Apr 27,2014

Obama and Putin Playing Out World War III Script Written by Banksters

Dave Hodges, The Common Sense Show
With the present Ukrainian crisis, the Russians are looking like a foe that could pose a real military threat to the United States. The forces of war are lining up in Ukraine. However, there is not much that is spontaneous about this event. Both sides are playing out a prepared script written by the banksters.
The Russian Threat
Some people mistakenly believe that Putin is going to single handedly defeat the bankers and save America from the New World Order. Nothing could be further from the truth. Putin, Obama, Ukrainian government, Crimea and NATO are right on cue as each party plays out its script in preplanned scenario.
Ask yourself a question. Why would the Russians be posturing to fight the the US over, first Syria, and then Ukraine, while at the same time be building up their troops on US soil? Didn’t Secretary of Defense Hagel announce on March 5th that the US was breaking off military cooperation with the Russians over the events in Ukraine? Then why would Hagel, on behalf of Obama, announce that we were reducing our military to pre-1940 levels in the midst of a crisis which could turn into World War III? Are we looking at gross incompetency, or are we looking at abject treason by deliberately compromising the military strength of the US? The following paragraphs make it clear that we are looking at treason emanating from the Obama administration. And to those of you who admire the new “Christian” on the block, President Putin, you may get to know him very well in the near future.
The Order of Events That Will Follow
go to link
http://dinartruthmatrix.net/obama-and-putin-playing-out-world-war-iii-script-written-by-banksters/

Video: Turncoat Glenn Beck Exposed as Obama Agent

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

Video: Turncoat Glenn Beck Exposed as Obama Agent
Posted By: Lion [Send E-Mail]
Date: Sunday, 27-Apr-2014 14:06:01

-----------------------
Turncoat Glenn Beck Exposed as Obama Agent

http://youtu.be/2t2eNLQeSnc
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2t2eNLQeSnc
Published on Apr 26, 2014
Alex is joined in studio by Infowars reporter and Nightly News Host David Knight to discuss the raging media controversy over "Racist" remarks by embattled rancher Cliven Bundy and the all out assault on infowars by glenn beck.

EXPLAINED WELL THE FOUR HORSEMEN DOCUMENTARY

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fbvquHSPJU

Talks about how the banks got control of us and how to break it

Published on Sep 13, 2013
FOUR HORSEMEN is an award winning independent feature documentary which lifts the lid on how the world really works.

As we will never return to 'business as usual' 23 international thinkers, government advisors and Wall Street money-men break their silence and explain how to establish a moral and just society.

FOUR HORSEMEN is free from mainstream media propaganda -- the film doesn't bash bankers, criticise politicians or get involved in conspiracy theories. It ignites the debate about how to usher a new economic paradigm into the world which would dramatically improve the quality of life for billions.

"It's Inside Job with bells on, and a frequently compelling thesis thanks to Ashcroft's crack team of talking heads -- economists, whistleblowers and Noam Chomsky, all talking with candour and clarity." - Total Film

"Four Horsemen is a breathtakingly composed jeremiad against the folly of Neo-classical economics and the threats it represents to all we should hold dear."
- Harold Crooks, The Corporation (Co-Director) Surviving Progress (Co-Director/Co-Writer)

Follow us on https://www.twitter.com/RenegadeEcon
on https://www.facebook.com/RenEconomist
or visit our website http://www.renegadeeconomist.com

Support us by subscribing here http://bit.ly/1db4xVQ

Also you can check our shop athttp://www.renegadeeconomist.com/info...

The Red Herring....Saul Alinsky Tactics And The BLM War

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

The Red Herring....Saul Alinsky Tactics And The BLM War
Posted By: Watchman
Date: Sunday, 27-Apr-2014 11:46:06

The internet has been buzzing for the last few days with hysterical hypocrisy from the Left over some remarks made by Clive Bundy, the Nevada Rancher who recently staved off a paramilitary assault by the Bureau of Land Management (BLM). Bundy made a comment that perhaps black people were better off slaves (as opposed to the neo-slavery of benevolent government.) He was roundly thrashed for his remarks.
First, this is textbook; Saul Alinsky Rules for Radicals rule #12
“Pick the target, freeze it, personalize it, and polarize it.” Cut off the support network and isolate the target from sympathy. Go after people and not institutions; people hurt faster than institutions. (This is cruel, but very effective. Direct, personalized criticism and ridicule works.)”
See, the Left cannot win any argument on the merits of their beliefs; they have to attack the personalities involved. The Politics of Personal Destruction Bill Clinton once called it – while being a master practitioner of the tactic himself. As the old legal adage says, if the facts are against you argue the law, if the law is against you argue the facts, if both are against you attack the parties involved. This last is what Liberals do, because they have neither facts nor laws on their side. They have to impugn people’s motives.
This instance dovetails with rule #4
“Make the enemy live up to its own book of rules.” If the rule is that every letter gets a reply, send 30,000 letters. You can kill them with this because no one can possibly obey all of their own rules. (This is a serious rule. The besieged entity’s very credibility and reputation is at stake, because if activists catch it lying or not living up to its commitments, they can continue to chip away at the damage.)”
The Left knows that Conservatives champion civil rights, and always have. So they produce isolated incidents that can be interpreted as racist, knowing full well that sympathy for the individual under assault (Bundy in this case) will dry up quickly. There will be no defense of a guy like Bundy and the end result will be a tarring of the entire movement.
And then there is rule #9
“The threat is usually more terrifying than the thing itself.” Imagination and ego can dream up many more consequences than any activist. (Perception is reality. Large organizations always prepare a worst-case scenario, something that may be furthest from the activists’ minds. The upshot is that the organization will expend enormous time and energy, creating in its own collective mind the direst of conclusions. The possibilities can easily poison the mind and result in demoralization.)
And indeed it already has, as conservatives and GOP Establishment types are now running from not just Clive Bundy but the whole BLM land grab issue, terrified of what the Left MIGHT do.
Second, Bundy’s remarks were stupid but one cannot conclude they were racist. Heclarified them in a way that suggests a man who is more ignorant than evil. He seems to have little understanding of the horribleness of chattel slavery. The man spoke pure idiocy. But there actually is a reasonable point in this instance; the hard bondage of slavery was changed for the soft bondage of governmental paternalism. While the paternalism may be a far easier existence, it is still an existence on a short leash, not a real life. Choices are made for so many black people by outside forces who seek to feel good at their expense. Slaves cannot quit their jobs, but then neither can wards of the State; the welfare system holds men in bondage as well.
And stupidity does not abrogate your civil rights; if it did everyone who voted for Barack Obama in the last election would find theirs forfeit. Even racists have civil rights.
Which is what this argument is supposed to be about. Does the government have the right to usurp property rights just because they can. This is not and should not be about Clive Bundy’s personal views. Bundy as an individual does not matter here; what matters is a fundamental principle.
The Liberals know this, and they know they will lose if they have this discussion. They HAVE to turn this into a food fight.
They have been trying to do this in other areas as well; see The Daily Kos comparing Bundy with Phil Robertson from Duck Dynasty. The Robertson family has been off the reservation from the beginning, and the Left cannot allow an openly Christian, morally conservative group to flourish. So they attacked Robertson in the same way.
The fact is that Bundy and the other Nevada ranchers were there first, and they have improved the land – the fundamental principle of land ownership as defined by John Locke. They had long-standing contracts. They have enforceable rights. The BLM came along and, as government always does, started off slowly, with modest fees and “common sense” regulations. Like a wildfire the winds began to blow and the controlled fire turned into a conflagration. Environmentalists managed to get the BLM to drive the cattlemen out (this dovetails with the Left’s war on food, something I’ve discussed previously.)
This is about property rights. This is about contracts. This is about the Rule of Law as opposed to the rule of force. This is about standing up to an agency which is supposed to work for the People and not the other way around. It is about being safe from paramilitary forces goosestepping over your property. It is about core American principles.
It is not about the person of Clivn Bundy. The statists have made it so because they cannot win a free and fair exchange of ideas on this issue.
Strangely enough, the very same voices shouting “RACIST!” remained silent when their own have made remarks as bad or worse. Consider Barack Obama, who sneeringly referred to his grandmother as “a typical white person” and who said the police “acted stupidly” in the altercation with his buddy at Cambridge (he admitted to having no facts but since a gentleman of color was involved…)
What of Joe Biden’s comment;
“You cannot go to a 7-11 or Dunkin Donuts unless you have a slight Indian Accent.”
or Biden’s wonderful commentary on Barack Obama;
“I mean you’ve got the first sort of mainstream African-American who is articulate and bright and clean and nice-looking guy.”
How about Hillary Clinton’s snide remark;
“Mahatma Gandhi “ran a gas station down in Saint Louis.”
And then you have Harry Reid making the observation that Obama is;
“‘light-skinned’ African American with ‘no Negro dialect, unless he wanted to have one.’”
In point of fact the people who champion leftist causes are chock full of racism. Seehere here for more.
For decades they supported Robert Byrd, former Ku Klux Klan leader. Anyone remember his remarks about white n****r’s?
So any tears shed by these people are strictly of the crocodile nature. Where was their outrage? Their oh-so-holy righteous indignation? Their rigid moral code only seems to apply to those who are damaging to their own cause.
This indignation is a red herring, one clearly designed to turn the discussion from one of fundamental rights to a contest to see who can urinate the farthest. We should not fall for it.
Nor should we concede defeat before the battle has been well engaged. Too many people are ready to do just that.
I would remind everyone that Saul Alinsky admonished his troops to not use a tactic that drags on too long. The fact that the Left has to keep going back to the racism well is proof they are out of quivers.
We can win this fight if we stick to first principles.
http://canadafreepress.com/index.php/article/62674

Pope Francis Declares Popes John Paul II and John XXIII Saints in History-Making Canonization — See the Stunning Photos

(** Please refer to website references at the conclusion of this article for important revelation on these popes)

TheBlaze

Pope Francis Declares Popes John Paul II and John XXIII Saints in History-Making Canonization — See the Stunning Photos

Apr. 27, 2014 7:22am

VATICAN CITY (TheBlaze/AP) — A massive audience showed up Sunday to see a historic dual papal canonization — the first in history. Pope Francis presided over the event, which was a public proclamation of Popes John Paul II and John XXIII’s sainthood. (?)
Adding to the historic and uncommon nature of the canonization was the fact that two living pontiffs were present, as Pope Benedict XVI was in attendance. Never before has a reigning and retired pope celebrated Mass together in public, much less at an event honoring two of their most famous predecessors.
Francis took a deep breath and paused for a moment before reciting the saint-making formula in Latin, as if moved by the history he was about to make.
He said that after deliberating, consulting and praying for divine assistance “we declare and define Blessed John XXIII and John Paul II be saints and we enroll them among the saints, decreeing that they are to be venerated as such by the whole church.”
Applause broke out from a crowd that stretched from St. Peter’s to the Tiber River and beyond.
See stunning images from the canonization below:

Historic Canonization of Two Popes


· 
Pope Francis delivers his blessing during a solemn canonization ceremony in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. Pope Francis has declared his two predecessors John XXIII and John Paul II saints in an unprecedented canonization ceremony made even more historic by the presence of retired Pope Benedict XVI. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)
· 
Faithful fill St. Peter's Square at the Vatican Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)
· 
A boy is helped by his mother to touch a statue of Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II on display with other relics of the late Pope as well as Pope John XXIII in celebration of their canonization or the elevation to sainthood Sunday, April 27, 2014 at suburban Quezon city, northeast of Manila, Philippines. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
· 
From left, Queen Paola of Belgium, King Albert II of Belgium, Spain's King Juan Carlos and Queen Silvia attend a solemn celebration led by Pope Francis I where two Popes, John Paul II and John XXIII, were canonized in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)
· 
Pope Francis touches a statue of the Virgin Mary as he leads a solemn ceremony in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia)
· 
Faithful wear 3D glasses as they watch the screening of the canonization of Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II taking place at the Vatican, at the parish church in Sotto il Monte Giovanni XXIII, near Bergamo, northern Italy, the town of John XXIII, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Luca Bruno)
· 
Devotees take photos of the relics of Roman Catholic Pope John Paul II and Pope John XXIII on display in a shopping mall Sunday, April 27, 2014 at suburban Quezon city, northeast of Manila, Philippines. Pope Francis declared his two predecessors John XXIII and John Paul II saints on Sunday before hundreds of thousands of people in St. Peter's Square, an unprecedented ceremony made even more historic by the presence of retired Pope Benedict XVI. The predominantly Roman Catholic Philippines joins several nations worldwide in the celebration of canonization of Pope John Paul II and Pope John XXIII. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)

XXIII. (AP Photo/Bullit Marquez)
· 
Paraguay's people react as they look at a TV screen showing the Vatican ceremony of a historic day of four popes, with Popes Francis and Benedict XVI honoring John XXIII and John Paul II by declaring them saints, at Nazareth church in Asuncion, Paraguay, Sunday, April 27, 2014.(AP Photo/Jorge Saenz)
· 
People fill via della Conciliazione, the road leading to St. Peter's Square, at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Andrew Medichini)
· 
Faithful fill St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)
· 
Prelates gather in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)
· 
Floribeth Mora, a Costa Rican woman whose inoperable brain aneurysm purportedly disappeared after she prayed to John Paul II, grabs a relic of Pope John Paul II during a solemn ceremony in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)
· 
The tapestry showing Pope John XXIII hangs from the facade of St. Peter's Basilica during a solemn celebration led by Pope Francis in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Alessandra Tarantino)
· 
Pope Francis gets his skullcap adjusted as he leads a solemn ceremony in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Gregorio Borgia)
· 
Don Ezio Bolis, Director of the John XXIII foundation and the Roncalli family, carries the relic of Pope John XXIII past Pope Francis, during a solemn ceremony in St. Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Domenico Stinellis)
Peter's Square at the Vatican, Sunday, April 27, 2014. (AP Photo/Domenico Stinellis)
“Four popes in one ceremony is a fantastic thing to see and to be at because it is history being written in our sight,” marveled one of the visiting Poles, David Halfar. “It is wonderful to be a part in this and to live all of this.”
Most of those who arrived first at St. Peter’s had camped out overnight nearby on air mattresses and sleeping pads. Others hadn’t slept at all and took part in the all-night prayer vigils hosted at a dozen churches in downtown Rome.
By mid-morning, the scene in the square was quiet and subdued — perhaps due to the chilly gray skies and cumulative lack of sleep — unlike the rollicking party atmosphere of John Paul’s May 2011 beatification when bands of young people sang and danced in the hours before the Mass.
As TheBlaze highlighted yesterday in a preview of today’s big event, there are a number of qualifications one must meet in order to be considered a 'saint' — and the process the Catholic Church goes through before canonization is possible is complex and extensive.
Both Pope John XXIII and Pope John Paul II met these qualifications — miracles and all. And both for very different reasons.
Pope John XXIII, who reigned from 1958-1963, is a hero to liberal Catholics for having convened the Second Vatican Council. The meetings brought the church into the modern era by allowing Mass to be celebrated in local languages rather than Latin and by encouraging greater dialogue with people of other faiths, particularly Jews.
During his quarter-century papacy from 1978-2005, John Paul II helped topple communism through his support of Poland’s Solidarity movement. His globe-trotting papacy and launch of the wildly popular World Youth Days invigorated a new generation of Catholics, while his defense of core church teaching heartened conservatives after the turbulent 1960s.
“John Paul was our pope,” said Therese Andjoua, a 49-year-old nurse who traveled from Libreville, Gabon, with some 300 other pilgrims to attend. She sported a traditional African dress bearing the images of the two new saints.
“In 1982 he came to Gabon and when he arrived he kissed the ground and told us to ‘Get up, go forward and be not afraid,’” she recalled as she rested against a pallet of water bottles. “When we heard he was going to be canonized, we got up.”
Kings, queens, presidents and prime ministers from more than 90 countries attended. Some 20 Jewish leaders from the U.S., Israel, Italy, Francis’ native Argentina and Poland were also taking part, in a clear sign of their appreciation for the great strides made in Catholic-Jewish relations under John, John Paul — and their successors celebrating their sainthood.
Read more about how someone becomes a saint here.
CONSIDER THIS:
** http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/satanism_in_the_vatican.htm   
    http://www.freemasonrywatch.org/roncalli_popejohnxxiii.html
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=EVayBG7eJvU&feature=related
    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Roman%20Catholicism/pope-devil-masonic_lodge.htm
    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=b52irbjSVWA&feature=player_detailpage
    http://www.jesus-is-savior.com/False%20Religions/Wicca%20&%20Witchcraft/signs/signs_of_satan3.htm
    http://www.cuttingedge.org/news/n2029.cfm
    http://www.endtimeschristianity.com/cgi-bin/webbbs_files/webbbs_config.pl?read=1256
    http://adishakti.org/book_of_revelation/revelation_17.1-2.htm

Transcript of Roosevelt's 1933 Banking Crisis (Bankruptcy) Radio Speech

National Emergencies Declared a Necessity
In the “Foreword” to Senate Report 93-549, Senators Mathias and Church wrote, “[T]here is no present need for the United States Government to continue to function under emergency conditions.” Later, in the body of the report, they added, “In the view of the Special Committee, an emergency does not now exist. Congress, therefore, should act in the near future to terminate officially the states of national emergency now in effect.”(12) The U.S. Attorney General, however, was of a different opinion:
 
The Trading With the Enemy Act of 1917 has been amended frequently, and in the process its original purpose and effect have been altered significantly. The Act was originally intended to “define, regulate, and punish trading with the enemy.” 40 Stat. 415. Directed primarily to meeting the exigencies of World War I, its drafters intended the Act to remain on the books for future war situations. 55 Cong. Rec. 4908. Accordingly, when other war powers were terminated in 1921 an exception was made for the Act and it remained valid law. 41 Stat. 1359.

On March 5, 1933, President Roosevelt relied on Sec. 5(b) of the Trading With the Enemy Act as authority for his Proclamation 2039 which closed all banks for five days. This was clearly a time of financial crisis, not of war, and hence was not within the literal terms and purposes of the Act. Congress rectified the situation five days later when it ratified the President’s proclamation and amended Sec. 5(b) to give the President the broad wartime powers of that section in times of declared national emergency as well. 48 Stat. 1. The desperate economic circumstances of the time dictated the passage of this sweeping change….

In early 1933 nation needed immediate relief, recovery from economic collapse, and reform to avoid future depressions, so relief, recovery and reform became Franklin D. Roosevelt`s goals when he took the helm as president. At his side stood a Democratic Congress, prepared to enact the measures carved out by a group of his closest advisors dubbed the Brain Trust by reporters. One recurring theme in the recovery plan was Roosevelt’s pledge to help the forgotten man at the bottom of the economic pyramid.
 
Birth of the New Deal The concepts that became the New Deal had been discussed in earlier years but without effect. The statement by National Catholic War Council in 1919, drafted by Father John A. Ryan, contained recommendations that would later be regarded as precursors of the New Deal.
 
The term "New Deal" was coined during Franklin Roosevelt’s 1932 Democratic presidential nomination acceptance speech, when he said, "I pledge you, I pledge myself, to a new deal for the American people." Roosevelt summarized the New Deal as a "use of the authority of government as an organized form of self-help for all classes and groups and sections of our country.
 
The exact nature of Roosevelt`s intentions was not clear during the campaign, although his philosophy was set out in an address that he gave at the Commonwealth Club of San Francisco on September 23:
 
"The government should assume the function of economic regulation only as a last resort, to be tried only when private initiative, inspired by high responsibility, with such assistance and balance as government can give, has finally failed. As yet there has been no final failure, because there has been no attempt, and I decline to assume that this nation is unable to meet the situation."
 
At his inauguration in March 1933, Roosevelt declared in his lilting style, "Let me assert my firm belief that the only thing we have to fear is, fear itself needless, unreasoning, unjustified terror which paralyzes needed efforts to convert retreat into advance." In his first 99 days, he proposed, and Congress swiftly enacted, an ambitious "New Deal" to deliver relief to the unemployed and those in danger of losing farms and homes, recovery to agriculture and business, and reform, notably through the inception of the vast Tennessee Valley Authority (TVA). The New Deal effects would take time; some 13,000,000 people were out of work by March 1933, and virtually every bank was shuttered.


GAMBLING BOSS & REPUBLICAN (GOP) PARTY FINANCIER ARRESTED FOR 364 MILLION IN MONEY LAUNDERING



GAMBLING BOSS & REPUBLICAN (GOP) PARTY FINANCIER ARRESTED FOR 364 MILLION IN MONEY LAUNDERING

AIPAC gambling boss may flee US
Activists protesting outside an AIPAC policy conference in Washington carry signs highlighting Israel’s rights violations.
Activists protesting outside an AIPAC policy conference in Washington carry signs highlighting Israel’s rights violations.
Sat Apr 26, 2014 4:40AM GMT

Yesterday, federal officials took into custody the reputed partner of gambling boss Sheldon Adelson, the chief financial backer for the American-Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) and primary financier for America’s GOP or Republican Party.

Sources at the Department of Justice say Adelson is accused of laundering $364 million dollars, much of which went into the pockets of politicians in Washington “friendly” to Israel.

If Adelson is indicted, and sources in the Justice Department say this process is well underway, politicians around the US, all Republicans, will be required to return millions in what would then be not only illegal campaign contributions but clearly proof of ties between the GOP and organized crime.
Many of the politicians Adelson has supported on state government level have worked to suppress wages and workers’ rights, blocked regulations protecting consumers from mortgage and investment fraud and supported questionable gambling initiatives.
Adelson’s extremist politics have been a dark stain on the soul of America.

GRAND JURY
Sources direct to the investigation tell us that a special grand jury is preparing an indictment against Adelson for a long list of offenses, including but not limited to money laundering, mail and wire fraud and conspiracy.

Adelson, one of the world’s wealthiest men, with massive holdings in Las Vegas and Macao, never turns away from controversy. Adelson enraged the veterans community in the United States when he told an AIPAC audience that he was ashamed of having served in the American military when he felt loyalty only to Israel.

Critical is Adelson’s virtual control of America’s pro-Israel Republican Party. The GOP had hopes of using Adelson cash to gain control of the United States Senate. Analysts predict that were this to happen, America would not only move toward domestic collapse but there is a real possibility that regions of the US would seek to withdraw from the union, seeking an “autonomous zone.”

Adelson and his GOP “employees” have long stated the desire to use nuclear weapons in a preemptory attack on Iran and may well attack Russia and China as well. Though elected officials and, theoretically answerable for their positions, Adelson’s “gang” in Washington regularly promise to bring America to a full-scale war.

Our sources say that federal officials are presenting witness testimony to the grand jury that they believe ties Adelson directly to money laundering.

THE CASE AGAINST “SHELLY”

The accusations against Adelson are said to tie to a group of “shell companies” he has used to run online gambling around the world while publicly opposing online gambling. His partner in this endeavor is now in federal custody, said to be in witness protection, and prepared to testify at length to the grand jury that today was reported in an article in the Huffington Post.

Former CIA agent “Chip” Tatum spent many hours with a yet unnamed witness against Adelson. Stories include traveling the world in one of Adelson’s private jets on “business” that the government considers money laundering and racketeering.
We are currently in negotiations with the US Attorney and US Marshals to gain limited access for additional interviews.

WILL SHELLY FLEE?
Sources in the US Department of Justice are concerned that Adelson, who has vast holdings in Macao and around the world, will flee the United States rather than face arrest. Justice officials say that Adelson’s arrest is only a matter of time.
However, Adelson though aged and no longer well, has a history of standing up to critics. Adelson also has absolutely no respect for the US government, an organization he has spent millions “buying.”

Sources close to Adelson have told this reporter that he is driven by a profound hatred of President Obama that blinds him to the consequences of his actions. Adelson, unlike the extremist Koch Brothers and Richard Mellon Scaife, wealthy autocrats that finance America’s ultra-right wing GOP, is a real self-made man.
Adelson started with nothing and built a fortune estimated between $50 and $100 billion. Adelson is a strong backer of, not just Israel, but Israel’s most extremist elements. His money doesn’t just buy political favors in the US but influences politics inside Israel as well.
In fact, groups in Israel opposed to his extremist views are working to prevent him from gaining control of Israel’s media, a project Adelson has been working on for some time.

EXPOSING “GANGSTER AMERICA”

During the last election, consultants working for the Federal Bureau of Investigation brought documentation that showed the GOP candidate, Mitt Romney, to be involved in money laundering. Photographs of Romney in Cuba were supplied including one with his mistress, Maria Perez Andropov.

In hours of tape recorded meetings, a massive plot under investigation by the Department of Justice was outlined. Ties between major US corporations including one huge retailer and drug cartels were documented. Documents were presented showing Raoul Castro, current Cuban head of state, to provide safe haven for meetings between American officials involved in money laundering and their cartel counterparts.

Dates of visits, outlining flights from Toronto and Vera Cruz to Havana were listed. These interviews are all taped, all secure.
The Adelson case ties directly to the pattern. Those shown to be involved with the Mexican cartels are all prominent “friends of Israel.” All are members of the Republican Party.

What we saw then was a comprehensive case against Romney and other top GOP politicians. However, if what we now see plays out, it will be Adelson, 86 years old, self-made billionaire, that will be the only target.

It is true that Adelson is “the last man standing.” Adelson has virtually promised to spend “whatever it takes” to buy the next two America elections. Has this made Adelson the target? Has the extreme danger of war, which can be credited to extremist elements in the US tied to Adelson, men like Senators Ted Cruz and John McCain, put a “target on Shelly”?

It would take very little to imprison half of America’s government and certainly most of Wall Street. Their crimes are notorious. Most military contractors and oil companies engage in massive fraud as part of their daily business.

When we look at Adelson, Israel’s powerhouse in the US, when we look at the politicians who slavishly bow to his every whim, we wonder. Why does Obama only go after Adelson and never those who have sold their souls to him so openly?
NN
Visit stage3alpha at: http://s3alpha.net/?xg_source=msg_mes_network

To control which emails you receive on stage3alpha, click here

FOIA Of Truth Or Government Resignations!

Sheriffs and Larry Klayman,

You should Request that your Local Governments Take Actions on getting a FOIA Request to make sure they are Working for the Proper Original Constitutional Federal Government!
If the others are NOT true then they could be a Coup preparing for an Overthrow, or they are just ignorant of their research.

FOIA Request for the Present Federal Government; THE UNITED STATES, INC.
FOIA Request for The Republic for the United States of America
FOIA Request for the Confederacy United States
Other FOIAs Request:
FOIA Request for the Executive Orders of the CEO of THE UNITED STATES, INC. has Superseding Authority over the U.S. Constitution
FOIA Request for Each and Every 48 State's Documents to Ratify the 16th Amendment on Income Tax
FOIA Request for the Income Tax Act of 1913
FOIA Request for the Federal Reserve Act of 1913
FOIA Request for the Organic Act of 1871 for the NEW THE UNITED STATES, INC. to be our government
And especially if THE UNITED STATES, INC. is our Federal Government, then a FOIA Request for the Names of ALL Past and Present Board Members and Stock Holders as THEY CONTROL We The People as Property

THE UNITED STATES, INC. 
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/District_of_Columbia_Organic_Act_of_1871 
The District of Columbia Organic Act of 1871, formally An Act to provide a Government for the District of Columbia, is an Act of Congress that repealed the individual charters of the cities of Washington and Georgetown and established a new territorial government for the whole District of Columbia.

The Republic for the United States of America
http://www.republicoftheunitedstates.org/what-is-the-republic/history/ 
The United States exists today in two forms: One, is the original de jure United States of America Republic that was controlled by “We the People” until about 1871. The other form is the de facto.

REIGN OF THE HEAVENS SOCIETY (Confederacy United States with the American Nationals)
http://reignoftheheavens.org/ 
SINCE THE ELECTIONS OF DECEMBER 1, 2013, THE ORIGINAL CONFEDERACY OF 1781 HAS BEEN ACTIVE BUT QUIET. 
http://www.scribd.com/doc/154675482/Bill-of-Rights-Re-Instatement-Through-Present-Day-Ratification 

More On The Rumor: Report claims Eric Holder approved drone strike against Bundy ranch

The Rumor Mill News Reading Room 

More On The Rumor: Report claims Eric Holder approved drone strike against Bundy ranch
Posted By: Watchman
Date: Sunday, 27-Apr-2014 11:27:57

On Friday, John Jacob Schmidt of Radio Free Redoubtsaid that according to Stewart Rhodes, founder of Oath Keepers, Attorney General Eric Holder has approved drone strikes against the Bundy ranch to take place some time in the next 48 hours. According to Schmidt, the information came from a source Oath Keepers has within the Department of Defense.
That source, according to the report, allegedly said Attorney General Eric Holder authorized what is known as a “hot drone strike” against the ranch. Such a strike, he added would effectively kill everyone at the ranch.
Schmidt said that as far as he could determine, there has been no attempt to follow through with the alleged threat. He also expressed hope that a planned strike against Americans on U.S. soil could be averted.
According to a post at The Liberty Beacon, Rhodes said feds are treating the Bundy ranch situation like a bomb threat in a school. Leslie Bishop Paul, the national administrator of Oath Keepers, said on Facebook the information “may, or may not” be valid, but hoped that “sunlight’ would cause federal agencies to back down from such an act.
“Pray it isn’t true and pray it never happens,” Paul added.
Liberty Beacon went on to say that such a move by the government would be the straw that broke the proverbial camel’s back. The blog went on to suggest that the information might be intended to provoke violence, giving the government reason to impose martial law.
“So is this disinformation to get the boots on the ground to evacuate the scene so that BLM people can move in Waco style, or is it absolute bull to have us put out false info and destroy our credibility,” the blog asked. During an interview with Schmidt, Rhodes said it is possible the report could be part of a disinformation campaign. The person who reportedly gave the information, he said, believes what he heard.
Rhodes also said that Holder felt justified in his decision, based on comments made by Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid, D-Nev. As we reported last Friday, Reid called Bundy supporters “domestic terrorists.”
Attempts to obtain comments from the Department of Justice have so far been unsuccessful. The entire 20-minute report can be heard here.
http://www.examiner.com/article/report-claims-eric-holder-approved-drone-strike-against-bundy-ranch